Misplaced Pages

10 June 2009

• curprev 02:3302:33, 10 June 2009 75.169.94.36 talk 11,682 bytes +161 Ragnar is a race company. That would be the evidence. What evidence do you have that Rauschenberg added L'Arche as his charity after contacting them for a race fee waiver, etc? None. undo
• curprev 02:1602:16, 10 June 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,521 bytes −161 See discussion page. Let's stick to the results of the mediation. What support do you have for DR working for a "race company"? - he is on his own undo

8 June 2009

• curprev 05:5205:52, 8 June 2009 75.169.58.50 talk 11,682 bytes +161 Undid revision 295115779 by 66.173.140.100 (talk) Yes, see discussion page. undo
• curprev 05:1005:10, 8 June 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,521 bytes −161 See discussion page undo
• curprev 01:0201:02, 8 June 2009 75.169.58.50 talk 11,682 bytes +161 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo

2 June 2009

• curprev 17:1517:15, 2 June 2009 CutOffTies talk contribs m 11,521 bytes −2 rm extra spaces undo

1 June 2009

• curprev 15:3115:31, 1 June 2009 12.105.229.198 talk 11,523 bytes +61 After disparaging Rauschenberg so much, to try and remove the fact he was 2 hours faster than those who had done the "same thing" shows how one sided your editing is undo

31 May 2009

• curprev 05:1705:17, 31 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,462 bytes +78 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo
• curprev 04:3404:34, 31 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,384 bytes −61 Undid revision 292304983 by 198.202.202.21 (talk) undo

25 May 2009

• curprev 21:4921:49, 25 May 2009 198.202.202.21 talk 11,445 bytes +61 →Background undo
• curprev 18:1218:12, 25 May 2009 XLinkBot talk contribs 11,384 bytes +23 BOT--Reverting link addition(s) by 198.36.194.3 to revision 290994698 (http://danerunsalot.blogspot.com/) undo
• curprev 18:1018:10, 25 May 2009 198.36.194.3 talk 11,361 bytes −32 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo
• curprev 18:0818:08, 25 May 2009 198.36.194.3 talk 11,393 bytes +9 →Background undo

19 May 2009

• curprev 18:2818:28, 19 May 2009 75.169.62.99 talk 11,384 bytes +95 This is simply not correct. Why it continues to be changed as such is unknown to me. undo

14 May 2009

• curprev 23:1223:12, 14 May 2009 158.59.27.249 talk 11,289 bytes +19 old text is more accurate undo
• curprev 23:1023:10, 14 May 2009 158.59.27.249 talk 11,270 bytes −95 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo
• curprev 18:4418:44, 14 May 2009 75.169.90.97 talk 11,365 bytes −19 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo

8 May 2009

• curprev 14:2814:28, 8 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,384 bytes +6 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo
• curprev 10:0710:07, 8 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,378 bytes +118 added refs undo
• curprev 10:0010:00, 8 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,260 bytes +188 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo

3 May 2009

• curprev 01:2101:21, 3 May 2009 72.255.26.47 talk 11,072 bytes −93 Agreed. Even more so we should not source a quote on coolrunning.com and then claim it says what it doesn't. Reading what you want into the quote doesn't make it true. undo

1 May 2009

• curprev 11:5711:57, 1 May 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,165 bytes +94 Let's stick to the outcome of the mediation, unless we have documented sources undo

29 April 2009

• curprev 22:1322:13, 29 April 2009 24.101.222.224 talk 11,071 bytes −94 Incorrect that Rauschenberg selcted L'Arche after he ran their marathon. Even stretching the phrase "a few months" into the planning does not take it to after the race was run. undo
• curprev 22:0922:09, 29 April 2009 24.101.222.224 talk 11,165 bytes −117 →Background: Far too much opinion entered. undo

27 April 2009

• curprev 18:1818:18, 27 April 2009 158.59.27.249 talk 11,282 bytes +1 →Running 52 marathons in 2006 undo
• curprev 18:1518:15, 27 April 2009 158.59.27.249 talk 11,281 bytes +96 →Background: clarify undo
• curprev 18:1018:10, 27 April 2009 158.59.27.249 talk 11,185 bytes +1,047 expand background context undo

20 April 2009

• curprev 18:1318:13, 20 April 2009 Shoestoreface talk contribs 10,138 bytes −328 does not meet notability reqs or provide useful background. I also can't confirm it. The FN lists the time and results, but not what challenge is. can anyone confirm that all were in 24 hrs? undo

18 April 2009

• curprev 15:1415:14, 18 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 10,466 bytes −506 delete PIEC per discussion page. Added reference from discussion page undo Tag: references removed
• curprev 01:1901:19, 18 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 10,972 bytes −399 See discussion page. 1) Misplaced Pages should not be used to promote a book, and 2) Misplaced Pages should not be used to promote a future race. See Misplaced Pages:CSD#G11 undo

17 April 2009

• curprev 15:5315:53, 17 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,371 bytes +399 Book is 100% tied to the running of the 52 Marathons and is properly referenced. Your saying is isn't doesn't make that untrue. undo
• curprev 10:2110:21, 17 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 10,972 bytes −13 please use the discussion page - we have established that R spoke. We can't prove that he received unsolicited invitations to speak. Even if we could, what difference does it make? undo
• curprev 10:1610:16, 17 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 10,985 bytes −399 Improperly sourced material not relevant to the section "Running 52 marathons in 2006" was removed undo
• curprev 05:4505:45, 17 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,384 bytes −69 Even Engle's website, the one referenced here (which is also apparently enough to not need secodnary sources by your standards) makes no mention of fundraising. undo Tag: references removed
• curprev 05:4205:42, 17 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,453 bytes −2 No contradiction at all- Quote says L'Arche added as a beneficiary months after planning. Not months after "races started" nor that L'Arche was not in the planning (before addition) prior to that. undo
• curprev 05:3805:38, 17 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,455 bytes −2 Advertised as many things-84 miles were still run. Period. spoke or asked to speak - as you said there is no difference, except the fact that you wish to be contrary. undo
• curprev 05:3005:30, 17 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,457 bytes +400 Are you kidding? The publisher's webpage is not a good enough source for you?! undo
• curprev 03:4703:47, 17 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,057 bytes +2 Presque Isle is advertised as non-competitive, see prior discussion. "Rauschenberg spoke' is the relevant fact, why leave doubts in the reader's mind? undo
• curprev 03:4203:42, 17 April 2009 66.173.140.100 talk 11,055 bytes −400 Need reliable secondary sources - see talk page undo

16 April 2009

• curprev 12:0912:09, 16 April 2009 Pats2001 talk contribs 11,455 bytes −34 This post from subject of article contradicts his FAQs -- http://www.coolrunning.com/forums/Forum9/HTML/001605.shtml. Also see discussion page undo
• curprev 12:0012:00, 16 April 2009 Pats2001 talk contribs 11,489 bytes +69 Changes should not be made on this page without discussing them first -- see note on edit warring undo

15 April 2009

• curprev 02:3802:38, 15 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,420 bytes +34 Rauschenberg's own FAQ states the intent to run the marathons came in the initial planning stages. undo
• curprev 02:3602:36, 15 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,386 bytes −69 No verification of charitable efforts on any source. undo Tag: references removed

14 April 2009

• curprev 21:1821:18, 14 April 2009 143.231.249.138 talk 11,455 bytes +1 fixed typo undo
• curprev 21:1521:15, 14 April 2009 143.231.249.138 talk 11,454 bytes +5 missing subject undo
• curprev 21:1221:12, 14 April 2009 143.231.249.138 talk 11,449 bytes 0 Not sure why the two words were capitalized. undo
• curprev 21:1021:10, 14 April 2009 143.231.249.138 talk 11,449 bytes −8 The word "journey" is pure POV. Better to just state the facts. undo
• curprev 21:0921:09, 14 April 2009 143.231.249.138 talk 11,457 bytes −40 According to sources, selection of the dollar figure coincided with the selection of the source. As other sources indicate, the original intent was not to run for a sponsor. undo
• curprev 20:2220:22, 14 April 2009 Pats2001 talk contribs 11,497 bytes +69 See point on discussion page. Charitable efforts by Engle are verifiable. undo
• curprev 06:1206:12, 14 April 2009 75.169.94.227 talk 11,428 bytes −14 previous discussion noted; link to results pages also noted; no discrepancies found nor complaints registered with regard to validity of mileage run undo