Misplaced Pages

Siberian tiger: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 August 2014

10 August 2014

9 August 2014

7 August 2014

5 August 2014

31 July 2014

27 July 2014

25 July 2014

24 July 2014

12 July 2014

10 July 2014

9 July 2014

  • curprev 20:2820:28, 9 July 2014 72.80.196.223 talk 59,771 bytes +1 Yes, there have been more cases of tigers killing bears than vice versa, but calling the reverse "rare" would suggest a much greater difference than actually exists ("over 15"+22 vs. 3 +12). Thus, it is misleading to call such cases "rare".
  • curprev 20:2420:24, 9 July 2014 72.80.196.223 talk 59,770 bytes +1 Yes, there have been more recorded cases of tigers killing bears than vice versa, but calling one
  • curprev 20:2220:22, 9 July 2014 72.80.196.223 talk 59,769 bytes +22 Calling 3 + 12 cases of bears killing tigers (Heptner/Sludski + Seryodkin) "rare" while portraying "over" 15 + 22 cases of reverse as being the norm is a real stretch. Esp since one source (Heptner) says any interaction is rare (Vol II Part 1a p671)
  • curprev 20:1120:11, 9 July 2014 72.80.196.223 talk 59,747 bytes −26 "of various sizes and ages" is unsourced - please see talk page for details.

8 July 2014

7 July 2014

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Siberian tiger: Revision history Add topic