Misplaced Pages

2 October 2018

• curprev 14:5014:50, 2 October 2018 Tylerdmace talk contribs m 41,911 bytes −63 (HG) (3.4.4) Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 14:4914:49, 2 October 2018 2600:1:9031:f903:51f0:7916:5914:de82 talk 41,974 bytes +63 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 October 2018

• curprev 22:5222:52, 1 October 2018 Black Kite talk contribs m 41,911 bytes −9 Reverted edits by Simonvino (talk) to last version by ClueBot NG Tag: Rollback
• curprev 22:5122:51, 1 October 2018 Simonvino talk contribs 41,920 bytes +9 Undid revision 862064157 by ClueBot NG (talk) false positive, not vandalism Tags: Undo reverting anti-vandal bot
• curprev 22:4922:49, 1 October 2018 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 41,911 bytes −9 Reverting possible vandalism by Simonvino to version by Ivanvector. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3493371) (Bot) Tag: Rollback
• curprev 22:4922:49, 1 October 2018 Simonvino talk contribs 41,920 bytes +9 restoring
• curprev 12:5812:58, 1 October 2018 Ivanvector talk contribs 41,911 bytes 0 Reverted 1 edit by 2601:5C4:300:A01:C4F5:D14F:282A:7805 (talk): Rv number change vandalism. (TW) Tag: Undo
• curprev 12:4612:46, 1 October 2018 2601:5c4:300:a01:c4f5:d14f:282a:7805 talk 41,911 bytes 0 Fixed typo Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 September 2018

• curprev 14:1814:18, 28 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 41,911 bytes −9 Undid revision 861582628 by Iwog (talk) I was asked to comply with the 3 revert rule. I will address this in the discussion. Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 28 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 41,920 bytes +9 Undid revision 861508050 by Calton (talk)None of the studies listed here attempt to find the true prevalence of false rape allegations. All of them except Kanin openly admit there are unknowns exceeding 80% of the data. Only PROVABLE false rape allegations are being examined here. The title is not correct and not a verifiable citation of any of the studies. Tag: Undo

27 September 2018

• curprev 23:0723:07, 27 September 2018 Calton talk contribs 41,911 bytes −9 →Rumney (2006): Where the hell did "provable" come from?
• curprev 22:3622:36, 27 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs m 41,920 bytes +12 +link journal
• curprev 22:2822:28, 27 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 41,908 bytes +9 →Rumney (2006)
• curprev 20:1520:15, 27 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs 41,899 bytes −355 Undid revision 861489866 by Iwog (talk) - please respond at Talk page User:Iwog, you are now at 3RR, thanks Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:0920:09, 27 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 42,254 bytes +355 Undid revision 861489446 by Isananni (talk)Your criticism does not apply to my edit. I am not claiming the accusations are false lacking a conviction. I am claiming the KNOWN number of true accusations can be presumed to be those convicted. Therefore my edit will leave a large gap of unknown validity which is accurate. Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:0520:05, 27 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 41,899 bytes −355 Undid revision 861488306 by Iwog (talk) source does not state that. It says perpetrators of sexual assault are less likely to go to prison compared to other crimes. This does not mean the allegations were false Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:5519:55, 27 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 42,254 bytes +355 Undid revision 861487965 by Roscelese (talk) My version is far more accurate and does not leave an extremely flawed and incorrect assumption on the part of the reader. Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:5219:52, 27 September 2018 Roscelese talk contribs 41,899 bytes −355 Reverted to revision 860563819 by GeneralizationsAreBad (talk): Lol. (TW) Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:1519:15, 27 September 2018 Iwog talk contribs 42,254 bytes +355 Since provably false allegations are being cited I added those allegations which are provably true. The actual number of false allegations lies somewhere in the middle. Tag: Visual edit

21 September 2018

• curprev 14:4314:43, 21 September 2018 GeneralizationsAreBad talk contribs 41,899 bytes −259 Undid revision 860563644 by Regonas (talk) RV number change, original interpretation Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:4114:41, 21 September 2018 Regonas talk contribs m 42,158 bytes +259 No edit summary
• curprev 11:1311:13, 21 September 2018 Black Kite talk contribs 41,899 bytes −703 rv - contentious, take to talk per WP:BRD please
• curprev 11:0611:06, 21 September 2018 Regonas talk contribs m 42,602 bytes +703 Made the article more balanced between two perspectives and less biased towards feminist interpretation. Added more sources about the subject.

20 September 2018

• curprev 16:0216:02, 20 September 2018 Roscelese talk contribs m 41,899 bytes −3 Reverted edits by 201.132.160.158 (talk) to last version by Nblund Tag: Rollback
• curprev 14:3714:37, 20 September 2018 201.132.160.158 talk 41,902 bytes +3 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 September 2018

• curprev 14:3614:36, 17 September 2018 Nblund talk contribs m 41,899 bytes 0 No edit summary
• curprev 14:3514:35, 17 September 2018 Nblund talk contribs 41,899 bytes +275 →Police on false rape: intro sentence mentioning research on police estimations of false accusations
• curprev 14:2214:22, 17 September 2018 Nblund talk contribs m 41,624 bytes +14 →Estimates of prevalence: adding refname
• curprev 14:0714:07, 17 September 2018 Nblund talk contribs 41,610 bytes −494 →Police on false rape: removing per talk
• curprev 06:5706:57, 17 September 2018 Calton talk contribs 42,104 bytes +266 Reverted to revision 859732808 by Mathglot (talk): Does the source say that? How did "academic" become a requirement? And if it's a "conjecture", it's a sourced one. (TW) Tag: Undo
• curprev 05:2405:24, 17 September 2018 IronAngelAlice talk contribs 41,838 bytes −266 This statement did not cute an academic study and was conjecture Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

15 September 2018

• curprev 23:3823:38, 15 September 2018 Mathglot talk contribs 42,104 bytes −695 →Germany: Blanked the section containing the claim that 80% of sexual attacks were false, because the source (www.ostsee-zeitung.de/Mecklenburg/Rostock/Acht-von-zehn-Vergewaltigungen-sind-vorgetaeuscht) does not say that. See Talk.
• curprev 16:5216:52, 15 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs m 42,799 bytes +4 →Archives of Sexual Behavior (2016): title
• curprev 16:4816:48, 15 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs m 42,795 bytes +105 →Journal of Forensic Psychology (2017): cite journal
• curprev 16:4216:42, 15 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs 42,690 bytes +54 →Journal of Forensic Psychology (2017): c/e
• curprev 16:3916:39, 15 September 2018 Martinevans123 talk contribs m 42,636 bytes +4 →Journal of Forensic Psychology (2017): +link
• curprev 13:4513:45, 15 September 2018 Calton talk contribs 42,632 bytes +60 Undid revision 859659078 by Isananni (talk) That's 3 reverts now. Tag: Undo
• curprev 12:5712:57, 15 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,572 bytes −60 Common wiki practice is NOT to go into numerical details in the lead as stated on the talk page. Please revert only when YOU have consensus to the contrary. Tag: Undo
• curprev 12:4112:41, 15 September 2018 PeterTheFourth talk contribs 42,632 bytes +60 Undid revision 859651988 by Isananni (talk) Please try to establish a consensus on talk before continuing to make these changes... Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:4511:45, 15 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,572 bytes −60 Rmv duplication (same data and refs are already in the article) and leaving all numerical details out of the lead.
• curprev 10:2510:25, 15 September 2018 PeterTheFourth talk contribs 42,632 bytes −298 Undid revision 859644266 by Isananni (talk) Undue. Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:2410:24, 15 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,930 bytes +298 Undid revision 859643394: yes I do know, so far it’s 2 to 1 in favor of my perfectly neutral rephrasing Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:1410:14, 15 September 2018 Calton talk contribs 42,632 bytes −298 Undid revision 859636837 by Isananni (talk) - Uh uh. Consensus -- you DO know what it means? -- comes first. Tag: Undo
• curprev 09:0409:04, 15 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,930 bytes +298 Undid revision 859631363: try using the talk page yourself before reverting edits on a page you have never contrubuted on I have given consensus to the edit request of other users Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:0308:03, 15 September 2018 Calton talk contribs 42,632 bytes −298 Undid revision 859320971 by Isananni (talk) talk page: use it AND get consensus Tag: Undo

13 September 2018

• curprev 07:3307:33, 13 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,930 bytes +298 Undid revision by Roscelese indeed and several editors agreed only mentioning the lowest rates was biased. Either mention both lowest and highest or none at all Tag: Undo
• curprev 05:5705:57, 13 September 2018 Roscelese talk contribs 42,632 bytes −298 Reverted to revision 859281252 by Uamaol (talk): I'm fairly sure we've talked about why this extreme outlier is inappropriate. (TW) Tag: Undo
• curprev 04:2004:20, 13 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,930 bytes +310 Added ref
• curprev 04:1804:18, 13 September 2018 Isananni talk contribs 42,620 bytes −12 Citing a wider range based on the studies quoted in the article per discussion on talk page
• curprev 00:4000:40, 13 September 2018 Uamaol talk contribs 42,632 bytes +22 →Los Angeles Police Department (2014): Too US-centric