Misplaced Pages

Argument from authority: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 January 2025

19 January 2025

17 January 2025

6 January 2025

  • curprev 19:0619:06, 6 January 2025 198.161.143.220 talk 25,824 bytes −36 Removed "strong" as there's no citation is pretty subjective here. A large part of what would make it a strong inductive argument is the additional large consensus from other authorities that have little reason to mislead. Also got rid of "and therefore not fallacious" because that is wrong, fallacies are very specific to deductive reasoning which has to do with certainty not probability. "fallacious in inductivism" isn't real (and there was no citation showing otherwise). undo

30 December 2024

  • curprev 06:4206:42, 30 December 2024 198.161.143.220 talk 25,860 bytes +2 Right before this we talk about Logic, to avoid confusion we shouldn't use the word "sound" here because that has a very specific meaning in Logic and appealing to authority would not be sound. undo

22 December 2024

22 October 2024

5 October 2024

19 August 2024

18 August 2024

20 July 2024

12 July 2024

27 June 2024

22 June 2024

2 June 2024

13 May 2024

11 April 2024

10 April 2024

5 April 2024

19 March 2024

17 March 2024

8 February 2024

2 February 2024

19 January 2024

11 January 2024

10 January 2024

9 January 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Argument from authority: Revision history Add topic