Asian fetish: Revision history

View logs for this page (view filter log)

Filter revisionsshowhide To date:Tag filter:Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 January 2025

curprev 20:5320:53, 13 January 2025 Codonified talk contribs 63,963 bytes +14 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 January 2025

cur prev 05:1905:19, 5 January 2025 Brunnianlink talk contribs 63,949 bytes −114 →History: removed subjective interpretation of source undo Tag: Visual edit

28 December 2024

cur prev 06:0006:00, 28 December 2024 Nightscream talk contribs 64,063 bytes −11 WP:NUMERAL; copyedit wording; merge paragraphs; put material in chronological order; merge 2013 material; etc. undo

22 December 2024

cur prev 21:0621:06, 22 December 2024 Yerevantsi talk contribs 64,074 bytes +1 more common spelling undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

25 November 2024

cur prev 11:2811:28, 25 November 2024 Polly Tunnel talk contribs 64,073 bytes −650 punctuation before references; removed unreliable source per WP:RSREDDIT; removed remaining WP:UNSOURCED content undo

6 October 2024

cur prev 23:2523:25, 6 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 64,124 bytes +967 →Terminology and usage of yellow fever: Add Mathieu writing about categorisations of fetishism. undo
cur prev 23:2423:24, 6 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,157 bytes −1,134 Change prose to fit Rothman better as per talk. Also make the lede prose fit 100% ShinyAlbatross's text in the body with "Targets of Asian fetish report". If they revert that then apparently they don't want the lede to reflect their own text in the body. Also return my note that is removed for unexplained reason while their own note is untouched. undo
cur prev 21:2621:26, 6 October 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 64,291 bytes +1,174 Undid revision 1249776847 by KSDerek (talk) : Please finish the discussion on talk page. undo Tag: Undo
cur prev 20:0220:02, 6 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,117 bytes +21 →Research on racial preferences: Noted the number of men and women here. undo
cur prev 19:3619:36, 6 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,096 bytes −1,174 You gave pretty much a non-answer on the talk. Still no idea why you keep removing Rothman as a source. I'm not the only one to have opposed your sweeping changes. Also, you reverted a simple note I added for the last section without even bothering to respond to it, that's very unconstructive. Returned Rothman, the note and the rest. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

1 October 2024

cur prev 17:3817:38, 1 October 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 64,270 bytes +1,174 Restore edits from Sep 30 - please finish discussion on talk page undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
cur prev 14:3114:31, 1 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,096 bytes +216 →Pornography: Note about almost exact copy of content at Pornography#Critical. undo Tag: Reverted
cur prev 12:4512:45, 1 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 62,880 bytes −310 This section had a good segue from objectification to the violence mention, as they mention objectification as the main cause of it. The other prose didn't really seem to exist in the sources, whereas objectification was focused on. Neither "passive" nor "hypersexual" were brought up in the quotes? That was mentioned in relation to pornography elsewhere, and again focusing on pornography. The law enforcement matter is again completely unrelated to the topic and belongs at the racism article. undo Tag: Reverted
cur prev 12:3012:30, 1 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,190 bytes +37 Again, like mentioned, it's not just about women, and that phrasing would require a "who?" template anyway. And the statements about violence are based on pornography, which as we can see, are mixed in findings and these cite the earliest study alone. It's a controversial view and not something to state absolutely one way in the lede, but with both findings. Interestingly the sources with quote were also first made for the lede prose and not for the body? Build the body first and not secondly. undo Tag: Reverted
cur prev 12:1712:17, 1 October 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 63,153 bytes −286 Sorry, didn't stay in for that. Restored Rothman, a reliable textbook about this paragraph's matter back. Also lessened prose as requested. The first source still doesn't talk about violence. undo Tag: Reverted
cur prev 12:0612:06, 1 October 2024 176.72.100.36 talk 63,439 bytes −831 No explanation was given how this source still has anything to with the article. Doesn't mention fetish, sex or sexualization. The quote added talks about WW2 internment and 1992 LA riots. The prose is about general racism. The additions belong at general article for racism, not here. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

30 September 2024

cur prev 19:1119:11, 30 September 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 64,270 bytes +191 Alter: title, chapter, pages. Add: jstor, pmc, doi-access, url, pmid, isbn, chapter-url, authors 1-1. Removed or converted URL. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | #UCB_toolbar undo
cur prev 19:0419:04, 30 September 2024 DuncanHill talk contribs 64,079 bytes +44 Fixing harv/sfn error. Please watchlist Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors and install User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js to help you spot such errors when reading and editing. undo
cur prev 19:0119:01, 30 September 2024 DuncanHill talk contribs 64,035 bytes +27 Fixing harv/sfn errors. Please watchlist Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors and install User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js to help you spot such errors when reading and editing. undo
cur prev 19:0019:00, 30 September 2024 DuncanHill talk contribs 64,008 bytes +46 →References: names undo
cur prev 18:3918:39, 30 September 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 63,962 bytes +5,476 Restore content relating to connections to violence - some wording revised. Sources have been improved upon and properly support the article. undo Tag: harv-error
cur prev 18:2418:24, 30 September 2024 50.213.83.65 talk 58,486 bytes −13 Undid revision 1248649721 by 2A0A:EF40:1297:D201:2592:BD0:BBE:B5F6 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
cur prev 18:1918:19, 30 September 2024 2a0a:ef40:1297:d201:2592:bd0:bbe:b5f6 talk 58,499 bytes +13 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 September 2024

cur prev 13:3113:31, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,486 bytes +285 Source to that effect. undo
cur prev 13:1413:14, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,201 bytes −9 Since the article was made to include homosexual fetishism, this sentence in the lede should also be made to reflect that. This simplification also fits all fetishisation in general. undo
cur prev 13:1113:11, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,210 bytes −535 This statement about violence wasn't even reflected in the non-scientific opinion post sources, all posted a few months apart 3 years ago about theorisation of one incident. And again, they focused on objectification. Some simply embedded Twitter posts. It seems maybe just one actually connected it like written. undo
cur prev 13:0413:04, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,745 bytes −16 This part in the lede had an absolute statement sourced to a few opinion posts. Reflected sources with "some" and even then it's too abstract. undo
cur prev 13:0113:01, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,761 bytes −173 →Pornography: Actually simpler to just cut out that part not reflected in the source. Also below that paragraph another source very clearly wrote "some" not "several". undo
cur prev 12:4612:46, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,934 bytes −30 →Pornography: Source didn't mention violence, merely went on about objectification. Moved the template down. undo
cur prev 12:3912:39, 25 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 58,964 bytes −304 The source was wholly unrelated to the topic of the article let alone the text it's used for, it had no mention of fetish or sex or sexualization. undo

24 September 2024

cur prev 20:2120:21, 24 September 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 59,268 bytes +227 →Pornography: Fix citation and minor word choice change. undo
cur prev 20:0820:08, 24 September 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 59,041 bytes +3,248 →Pornography: Add EJ Dickson, Mika Tan, Robin Zheng (2017), and SL Perry (2017). undo

23 September 2024

cur prev 18:2018:20, 23 September 2024 MusikBot II talk contribs m 55,793 bytes −17 Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info) undo
cur prev 18:0518:05, 23 September 2024 ShinyAlbatross talk contribs 55,810 bytes +915 →Research on racial preferences: Add Belletti & Wade 2008 study undo

19 September 2024

cur prev 03:5503:55, 19 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs m 54,895 bytes +13 →Pornography: CE undo
cur prev 03:2303:23, 19 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs m 54,882 bytes +13 →Pornography: CE undo
cur prev 03:1703:17, 19 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 54,869 bytes −163 This sentence in the lede didn't reflect the sources whatsoever. Not only did they not touch upon the fetish but what they wrote of their findings is also very different. undo
cur prev 03:1503:15, 19 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs 55,032 bytes +163 →Tourism: This section seemingly doesn't touch upon the topic either. undo
cur prev 03:1403:14, 19 September 2024 KSDerek talk contribs m 54,869 bytes −4 →Pornography: Didn't need this "and" undo