Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:45, 22 April 2010

Archive 1 12/2008 01/2009 02/2009 03/2009 04/2009 05/2009 06/2009 07/2009 09/2009 10/2009 11/2009 12/2009 cfwar 01/2010 02/2010 03/2010 04/2010 05/2010 06/2010 07/2010 08/2010 09/2010 10/2010 11/2010 12/2010 02/2011 03/2011 04/2011 05/2011 09/2011 10/2011 11/2011 12/2011 01/2012 02/2012 03/2012 04/2012 05/2012 06/2012 07/2012 08/2012 09/2012 10/2012 11/2012 12/2012 01/2013 02/2013 03/2013 04/2013 05/2013 06/2013 01/2014 02/2014 04/2014 05/2014 06/2014 GGsockfarms 12/2014 01/2015 02/2015 03/2015 04/2015 07/2015 11/2015 01/2016 11/2016 02/2017 10/2017 12/2017 11/2018 08/2020 11/2020 04/2021 05/2021 06/2021 07/2021 08/2021 09/2021 10/2021 11/2021 12/2021 01/2022 02/2022 03/2022 04/2022 05/2022 06/2022 07/2022 08/2022 09/2022 10/2022 11/2022 12/2022 01/2023 02/2023 03/2023 04/2023 05/2023 06/2023 07/2023 08/2023 09/2023 11/2023 05/2024 Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-03-08/The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America

Hi Hipocrite, I noticed that you expressed interest in taking this mediation case, which is fantastic. You don't need permission from anyone to take a case, except the agreement of the editors requesting and/or involved in the dispute at the heart of the mediation. All you have to do to formally take on the case is to edit the "medcabstatus" template at the top of the page, change the status from "New" to "Open" (which move the case from "Cases needing mediators" to "Open cases") and then include your name where it says "Mediator(s)" (I like to use ~~~ which puts my signature without a timestamp). Just letting you know, thanks! -- Atama頭 22:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

NAC

Thank you for working through my botched NAC. I hope it wasn't too much trouble :) I'll work to make sure any closures I do in the future are more unanimous. Happy editing! Jujutacular  17:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

PORNBIO vs ANYBIO change

I understand what you're trying to do, but I think the changes to ANYBIO are quite different from the ones you're proposing to PORNBIO. As such, I've reverted for now the change you've made to ANYBIO as lacking consensus. Let's nail down any modifications to PORNBIO first, then tackle your change to ANYBIO. Tabercil (talk) 23:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Misplaced Pages administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Misplaced Pages. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Firstly, thank you for signing the census, and an apology if you are one of those editors who dislike posts such as this one for messaging you again in this way. I've now got myself organised and you can opt-out of any future communication at WP:WikiProject Economics/Newsletter. Just remove your name and you won't be bothered again.

Secondly, and most importantly, I would like to invite your comments on the census talk page about the project as a whole. I've given my own personal opinion on a range of topics, but my babbling is essentially worthless without your thoughts - I can't believe for one moment that everyone agrees with me in the slightest! :)

All your comments are welcomed. Thanks, - Jarry1250  17:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

question

I received your comment at my Talk page. How did you happen to find your way to Old Natchez Trace (disambiguation), by the way? --doncram (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Orlady's talk page is on my watchlist for some reason. Hipocrite (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Comment

This comes across as more aggressive than necessary. Can you back off a bit? Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Fine. I assume you know who that is, correct? Hipocrite (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Rather than clog up the CC probation page further - and really, this is the very last time I intend to respond on the matter - I must tell you that you are wrong. Since you cannot reveal my identity from a former account, as I have none, I do not see how I can issue a waiver for a situation that doesn't exist. You are welcome to compile a list of users you think I am if you like, but you still won't be able to identify me from any of them, because I haven't had another identity. In the spirit of my message at the CC probation talkpage I am not going to get irate about all this, but please stop these alegations or take them to the proper venue. Weakopedia (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

If I reveal your old account name will you waive any claim I am outing you? Hipocrite (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

The subject of that conversation...

... is WMC, not you. (re: ) ATren (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Dosen't seem that way to me. Hipocrite (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Explanation

I don't understand this action. Several quite specific policy issues were raised and you seem to have quashed discussion. Can you explain. Thank you. nobs (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

National Anarchism

Hi there thanks for taking this on - I've been at work so only just seen the developments. I've posted to the mediation page. cheers. PsychoActiveKineticInternational TransVersal (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks from me as well. –xeno 16:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Not worth it

I have mentioned to ATren that the talk thread is making us all look silly. Best leave it. Polargeo (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

BRD as applied to MoMK

Hi Hipocrite. You recommended that during the mediation of Murder of Meredith Kercher, we restrict our editing to the BRD process. It is not something I have used before (and I doubt if some of the other editors have either). Zlykinskyja has recently added material to the article which I felt was too contentious to leave unchallenged while the mediation takes place (though I did think very seriously of about just leaving it!) So, today, I made a Bold edit and got the expected Reversion from Zlykinskyja. We have then entered a kind of discussion but I don't think, at the current rate, that we are really converging on any sort of consensus and probably we are both approaching the discussion in the wrong way. Any suggestions would be most helpful and might also help set the scene for the mediation. Thanks! Bluewave (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I will review and comment shortly. Hipocrite (talk) 17:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for picking this up—your approach is very constructive. And there is no deadline for this, so we can proceed at whatever pace fits in with Zlykinskyja's (and everyone else's) commitments. Bluewave (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy note re MoMK

Hi, just a quick note that I full-protected the article for 24 hours as an IP vandalism had initiated what I saw as a quick downwards spiral that would only complicate your mediation. I'm taking no stand on the underlying issues, but the alternative would be to block one of the parties, which I do not see as constructive. Wishing you wisdom in your mediation. MLauba 01:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

and that I call people "yahoo's," "septics," and "idiots."

No, that is me. I think you've misread the attribution William M. Connolley (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)