Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:22, 23 January 2007 view sourceRoyalguard11 (talk \| contribs)13,192 edits →A bunch of WikiProject banners: Response: un-protection request denied← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:26, 23 January 2007 view source Royalguard11 (talk \| contribs)13,192 edits →{{la\|Shawn Hornbeck}}: Response: un-protection request deniedNext edit →
Line 140:		Line 140:
	:I still disaree per ]. ] 14:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)		:I still disaree per ]. ] 14:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
	::This might be more appropiate on the talk page or BLP noticeboard, forgive me if I am wrong. Please see the discussion on talk. Regards, ] <sup>]</sup> 14:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)		::This might be more appropiate on the talk page or BLP noticeboard, forgive me if I am wrong. Please see the discussion on talk. Regards, ] <sup>]</sup> 14:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

			:] Obviously DR has not concluded yet. Please come to a conclusion and talk about requesting unprotection before asking. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 21:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

	===={{la\|Barack_Obama}}====		===={{la\|Barack_Obama}}====

Revision as of 21:26, 23 January 2007

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

Skip to table of contents
requests to raise protection
lower protection
requested edits
(purge)

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

History of the name Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection - edit war Nareklm 21:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected due to revert warring. Nishkid 64 21:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Bethpage High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - The high school page gets alot of vandalism from students. Previous problems include- gloryfication of sports, changing principals names, changing of school statistics, and many others. Semi-protecting would allow for edits to be made effectively of new items but not let the page turn into trash.

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Technology during World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - the last 50 edits have been nothing but V's and RVV's

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Basketball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - very heavy vandalism. Patstuart 19:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Baseball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - continual vandalism from IPs/new users. Patstuart 19:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Day of the Dead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. This article keeps getting badly vandalised, recently being completely deleted a couple of times. Xzamuel 19:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Artificial ski slopes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. The article is the subject of Misplaced Pages:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/Quixada due to repeated spam edits by a dynamic IP. Attempts at negotiation have failed. Attempts to moderate the spam contents have failed. The contents keep being inserted by a variety of linked but distinct IPs. SilkTork 19:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Violence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect - attack by vandals who are using it for chat! Corpx 18:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I added the sprotect tag even though it's not really protected to try and ward them off! Corpx 18:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy single-purpose account vandalism in the last 24 hours. Nishkid 64 21:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Oil City, Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of new account, and IP vandalism. There was a ton of it yesterday and it appears to be continuing today. KnightLago 18:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Schizophrenia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Constant vandalism from IPs. This article, of course, is attractive for some categories of users. Raoul NK 18:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

St. Mark's School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Constant vandalism today by newly registered users. Betaeleven 17:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Ashley Cole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Endlessly vandalised by IPs, due to the controversial nature of his departure from Arsenal, as well as tabloid gossip about his sexual orientation. Qwghlm 17:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The Simpsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Lots of IP vandalism and massive link-spam since becoming featured this month, which specificly increased in the recent few days. Michaelas10 (Talk) 17:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Circumnavigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Persistant IP vandalism from a specific IP. Russeasby 16:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 21:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Inca Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect Heavy IP vandalism from multiple IPs. Diez2 16:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Medusa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism; vandalized yesterday after my request was denied! TAnthony 17:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Lancelot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism; vandalized yesterday after my request was denied! TAnthony 17:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. 1 week. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Cuban Missle Crisis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Recent high level of IP vandalism is swamping ordinary edits - only about 2 real changes in last 25 edits. Beardo 15:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. 1 week. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Guy Maddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Someone constantly comes in to vandalise, removes films, categories and replace a lot of text without reason and has only edited this page specifically according to their contributations. Also occasionally coming in to just edit birthdates and mildly changing articles. Andrzejbanas 15:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Akinwale Arobieke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect - the nature of this article means it attracts vandals. Frequent IP vandalisation that I'm constantly reverting, either abusive messages or unencyclopedic nonsense or at the very best unsubstantiated hearsay. Marwood 12:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Uriah Rennie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - High levels of vandalism from IP editors. Gasheadsteve 10:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Page protected by Voice of All. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Lebanon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

A request for unprotection was made a few days ago (and I contested it myself), but now that Jaakobou (who was involved in the edit war) cannot contribute to the debate, and with both parties agreeing to refrain from making disputed edits, I'm requesting unprotection. —LestatdeLioncour t 18:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

A bunch of WikiProject banners

A bunch of WikiProject banners got fully protected recently for being "high risk template". They are certainly used in a lot of pages, but they're of course not used in any articles, which are the usual vandal targets. The average reader rarely visits any talk pages, so I think semi-protection should be enough for these templates. --Conti|✉ 17:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

It has more to do with server than vandalism. Changing the template will effect hundreds of pages. Any changes. Edits should therefore be kept to a minimum, and requested using {{editprotected}}. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Shawn Hornbeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Dispute resolution is concluded. Navou 13:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I still disaree per WP:BIO. AniMate 14:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

This might be more appropiate on the talk page or BLP noticeboard, forgive me if I am wrong. Please see the discussion on talk. Regards, Navou 14:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Obviously DR has not concluded yet. Please come to a conclusion and talk about requesting unprotection before asking. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Barack_Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Admin protected page because of "too much vandalism" did not consult with community, did not request arbitration. this was done by fiat. i disagree, vandalism was mangeable. please. do not let one admin block without going to talk page first for concensus. --Ibmthinkpads 11:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Admins don't need to request arbitration or consult before protecting. Voice-of-All 17:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Its still to soon to un-protect since the wave of vandalism will likely continue immediately after un-protection. Like VoA said, admins don't need to go to the talk page to get protection consensus. In a time like this, I'm surprised you're asking for unprotection, when you know people will be attacking Obama's article in light of his recent presidential candicacy. Nishkid 64 21:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Template was protected when the featured article of the day (December 19, 2006) was Muhammad Iqbal, which uses the template. The template was protected to prevent any possible vandalism before any actually took place. Since it has been over a month, please unprotect it. FranksValli Current requests for significant edits to a protected page Shortcut

WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Bill Clinton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Return of heavy and ongoing IP vandalism. Suggest long-term or permanent semiprotection. Tvoz | talk 08:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Voice-of-All 17:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Astronomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. The amount of infantile vandalism (plus the occasional antiscientific hatespeech) is really unpleasant. Seems to be a permanent problem ( see Talk:Astronomy#Vandalism). Suggest lengthy or permanent semiprotection. Kosebamse 06:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Voice-of-All 17:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Cynthia Mckinney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Zero edits on the page since 8 days ago. Zero edits on talk page since 10 days ago. Please unprotect this page as there is zero threat of vandalism or edit war or dispute to keep it protected. The natural state of a wiki page should be open, and I cannot find a single reason to keep this page locked. Thanks--137.146.170.68 17:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Already unprotected. Page is not protected. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Please double check.--Ibmthinkpads 04:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotected - it had been protected since April - that's entirely too long. --BigDT 04:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Brown people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Was protected during its afd which it passed, hence should be unprotected, SqueakBox 23:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

It was protected because people were edit warring on it yesterday. A little while is required for cool down. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Only one case of vandalism in past day. don't cower to the terrorists. --Hollerbackgril 21:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined Please list a page that is actually protected, and provide logical reasons for unprotection. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

OK I'll do that. Also don't cower to the terrorists. don't cut and run. --Hollerbackgril 04:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Sdedeo (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

User:Cplot has presumably moved on; would like anon &c. users to be able to leave messages. Sdedeo (tips) 01:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Un-protected. per request. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Infinity on High (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection requested. Completely removing protection was too extreme. The page already has received one IP spam edit, and is bound to get more due to the current leak and upcoming release. Semi-protection would be a wise choice to keep for about a months time. --Russ is the sex 05:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined - There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Really, comeback when there is some vandalism, and protection will be placed. Cheers! —— Eagle 101 05:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Bronx High School of Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. There is heavy anonymous IP vandalism, mostly from students within NYC (and some board-of-ed networks) placing their names, their outlandish comments, and their crazy gibberish. The administration of this school is controversial, and students love to use[REDACTED] to demonstrate their opinions. This level of slandering (specifically of principal reidy) is unacceptable and damaging to wikipedia. They like to change one character or word, sometimes, which is another form of vandalism on our page (Aside from the usuals) be sure to check back in our history a few months to see the full breadth--Rocketrye12 04:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Voice-of-All 05:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Dylan and Cole Sprouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-portection Constantly vandalized by ips. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy current IP vandalism. FT2 04:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk:HyperSonicBoom (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection requested in case I get any vandalism or spam from IP's. HyperSonicBoom 01:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cbrown1023 01:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Global Positioning System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Dhaluza 00:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 00:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Wright Brothers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Stable content, long history of IP vandalism. Dhaluza 00:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism, but stable is not a reason to semiprotect. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Ottoman casualties of World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Move protection. Move war brewing after AfD with somewhat ambiguous result. Issue is over article scope between just "casualties" and "Muslim casualties". Needs some close watching over the next day or so and protection if necessary. I'm involved, having taken sides on the issue. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

This has now heated up, phase of chaotic fast random move warring across more than two locations reached. Protection urgent. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Move-protected due to excessive renaming. Nishkid 64 23:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Clay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Vandals (could be a lone wolf) with varying IPs are vandalising this article daily. Mamour 22:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 22:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Totalitarianism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - Lots of vandals today Corpx 22:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 22:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Jay-Z (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Ridiculous amount of vandalism- some is starting to seep into the article amidst the confusion. --Wafulz 22:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 22:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Zendik farm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Constant vandalism by the memberes of the cult, and former members. They continually edit the article and delete anything that they don't agree with. Template:Unsigned6

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 22:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Pussy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Persistent vandalism because of the word's sexual meaning. This page has been semiprotected for vandalism several times before, and always someone after a while unprotects it and says "Page protected for a while; hopefully protection is no longer necessary." or similar, but always that hope proves to be illusory and the vandalism restarts within a day. Pussy was last unprotected at 21:12, 16 January 2007 by User:Centrx, and since then it has had to be reverted for vandalism 16 times in 4 days. Please YET AGAIN semiprotect Pussy, and please keep it semiprotected. Anthony Appleyard 21:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Avi 21:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Duck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Ditto, for the same reason as with Pussy, because of the common silly public image of ducks. Anthony Appleyard 21:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 22:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Heroes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Requesting full-protection for redirect to prevent redirect/edit wars. Consensus can be found at the debate/survey on the talk page. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected per talk page. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Car number plates (US Army in Germany) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Regular spamming of commercial link in the external link section by an IP address. -Toshi 20:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Nishkid 64 23:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Keystroke logging (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection required because of repeated insertion of spam links by anon editors. Fayenatic london 13:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected only edits last 2 days are either vandalism or reverts

Diarrhea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

LOTS of vandalism.TNTfan101 02:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Time is a week. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Volcano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Oliver202 19:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Nishkid 64 23:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories: