Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:15, 18 June 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beer Hall Putsch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beer Hall Putsch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / German This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force German military history task force Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Germany: Munich High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Munich (assessed as Top-importance). Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Bavaria High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on November 8, 2005, November 8, 2006, November 8, 2007, and April 1, 2018.

Template:Vital article

"Hitler Legalité

"Later on, the German people would call him Hitler Legalité or Hitler the Legal One." Where is the source for this preposterous claim? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.105.222 (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

the given source is this 'Enigma: The Caldwell Series'

Amazon: 'Engima is the continuation of the story begun in the novel LONDON. It is a work of fiction...'

a fictious novel may not be the best source i guess???12:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)12:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.96.141 (talk)

Quick Question

How could the putsch be inspired by Mussolini's march when it occurred a year later?Radnompieceofgarbage (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

This article was changed to incorrect dates, which has now been reverted. The Mussolini march was in October 1922 and this event was November 1923. Kierzek (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

"Hitler himself was not wounded during the clash"

It says that "Hitler himself was not wounded during the clash" but this is not entirely accurate. He suffered a dislocated shoulder during the putch. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 23:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

That would be considered an injury, not a wound. Kierzek (talk) 23:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Aren't "wound" and "injured" synonyms? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

No. That is incorrect English. A "wound" is tissue/body damage that is the result of intentional infliction by another; and is caused by a weapon or something used as a weapon, like a blunt instrument or it could even be from a teeth bite, for example. A soldier is wounded in battle.

An "injury" is something one suffers by accident, such as the result of a "slip and fall" or auto accident. A construction worker on a job site suffers an injury. No one has intended you harm or acted maliciously towards you. Unfortunately, like a lot of words and grammar these days, they are not used correctly even by some teachers and professional writers (especially on the web, it seems), who should know better. But, thanks for asking. Footnote: one could say all wounds are a type of injury, in a general sense; however, the opposite is NOT true. All injuries are not wounds. Kierzek (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, the sentence is confusing since the terms are considered synonyms. Is there a way to change the wording of this sentence to make it more clear? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Oxford Dictionary spells out the difference I stated above; see: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com. A wound is a type of injury in general, but not the reverse. With that said, why not change it to: Hitler was injured during the clash, when he suffered a dislocated shoulder, blah, blah, blah. You can put the detail in there as to how he was pulled down. I am at work so I don't have access to my home library for detail and RS citing of it. I can probably get to it soon, if you don't get to it before then. I have been very busy with work and real life lately. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• -Adolph Hitler Leaving Landsberg Prison- MET DP275747 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Source for section: "At the front of the march"

I believe there is quite a bit of misinformation in the above mentioned section.

Unfortunately it gives no reference or source to ascertain where the information was taken from, however the information on the page is contradictory to a first-hand account from Alfred Rosenberg in the first volume of Blut und Ehre (Pg. 96-97).

In this he states that Hitler was at the centre of front row, flanked to the right by Ludendorff, Göring, Graf, and Streicher, and to the left by Gräfe, Feder and Kriebel. Rosenberg himself was in the second row, directly behind Hitler, with Schickedanz to his left and Körner to his right.

The above account corresponds to many photos from the anniversary marches in later years, which roughly mirrored the locations of the men in 1923. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FormalRS (talk • contribs) 06:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Deutschlanderwac00bade 0 0039 Deutschland erwacht - Werden, Kampf und Sieg der NSDAP 1933 Wilfrid Bade (1906-1945) Cigaretten-Bilderdienst USHMM No known copyright restriction Hitlerputsch Gefallenen 1923 Cropped.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Ataturk

I have removed material from this article which claims that Hitler's Beer Hall Putsch was inspired by Kemal Ataturk. This theory is held by a single person writing in a recent book. This theory is not generally accepted by subject experts, and, as such, it is WP:FRINGE and per WP:DUE should not be in the article. As disputed FRINGE material, I do not need a consensus to remove it, but per BURDEN, the editor involved needs a consensus to restore it to the article.

The editor is edit-warring against its removal, arguing that it has been there for "a long time", but in fact it was added to the article (by the editor in question) less than a year ago. Further, when it was added, the editor downplayed the part Mussolini's March on Rome had on the Putsch, when, in fact, the vast majority of historians and scholars see it as one of the strongest influences on Hitler. No subject expert -- aside from the one author -- accepts the Ataturk theory, at least to my knowledge. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: The book of Ihrig had postive responses from review articles, so it is not a fringe claim. This review by Leo van Bergen praises the book as such: "It is rare to read a work of history that is both startling and true" This review states that Ihrig's argument is "convincing". There are lots of other reviews that praise the Ihrig's work which shows that this is not a fringe claim as the reviews agree with Ihrig. I will restore the stable version for the last time. You shouldn't revert it without having concencus.--V. E. (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

If you examine these reviews you will see that he is not the only author that "accepts the Ataturk theory".--V. E. (talk) 11:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

So, FRINGE and BURDEN claims are not valid here as the info is appropriately sourced and supported by other academicians.--V. E. (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Visnelma is deliberately trying to make a propaganda.His method is to add anti-Turkish sources wherever he wants without anyone noticing. his only defense .is that the source he entered has been there for a long time.please stop the damage this editor has done to wikipedia. He is constantly making his own propaganda.

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class military history articles
• C-Class European military history articles
• European military history task force articles
• C-Class German military history articles
• German military history task force articles
• C-Class Germany articles
• High-importance Germany articles
• C-Class Munich articles
• Top-importance Munich articles
• WikiProject Germany articles
• C-Class Bavaria articles
• High-importance Bavaria articles
• WikiProject Bavaria articles
• Selected anniversaries (November 2005)
• Selected anniversaries (November 2006)
• Selected anniversaries (November 2007)
• Selected anniversaries (April 2018)