Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:45, 29 March 2022

Packer&Tracker, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Welcome!

Hello, Packer&Tracker, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Princepratap1234 (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ravensfire (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Prithviraj Chauhan

Hi. Is this comment in the right place? You might want to place it in the section above rather than in the RfC. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

@RegentsPark: Yes, but was in bit of hurry so I kind of misplaced this comment to wrong section. Is this anything too serious ? Packer&Tracker (talk) 03:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Not a big deal. --RegentsPark (comment) 10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@RegentsPark: True that's the reason I wasn't much bugged about it either. Packer&Tracker (talk) 02:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Do you watch Anupama show. What are your views on this . 2409:4063:6E9B:38FE:C8D:18B1:A223:C89 (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

No IP, I hardly watch any ITV series in last decade or so, Cheers.Packer&Tracker (talk) 03:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Nice as nowadays they are showing crap on television. 2409:4063:6E9D:E3C8:63A7:93C4:AF83:3927 (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Indeed I concur with you 100% on it. Packer&Tracker (talk) 02:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Which shows did you use to watch earlier. 2409:4063:6E9C:4AF4:1BC6:141A:8C1E:C3DC (talk) 03:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Mariam-uz-Zamani edit

Hello, I have noticed that you have suggested some edits however, I have seemingly noticed some sourced content removal that is factual. I do agree that the line of first and last love should be removed. Also, no content that is shown in any daily soap or movie has been added and without reference will never be. I would request you to not remove any sourced content. Nush1125 (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I have also taken due consideration of your last edit and have removed the first and last love line, however, Misplaced Pages is not a platform where an individual gets to express their perspective of a person. There are several other platforms meant for citing our understanding of various prominent people like quora or blogs. We are here expected to share our research and readings with reliable and authentic references and removal of which, I fear, is considered as a breach of conduct here. I do understand that everyone is entitled to their outlook of an individual, nevertheless, without quotations, we must not vandalize the information that has been cited by any editor across Misplaced Pages especially when the reference stands true. Whatever has been written for her in Akbarnama and Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh, written by Abdul Badayuni, Grand Mufti of Akbar and a few other historical documents has been asserted with references, nothing less or more. Such references cannot be put into trials and information from them is deemed authentic. They have also been the base of several historians' assertions.

About her being favorite, it has been clearly stated by Muhammad Qasim who was not only deployed under Akbar but also was a revered noble serving Prince Daniyal. That piece has been directly picked from his writings without any ounce of fabrications, which aboded during Akbar's and Jahangir's reign. Regarding her influence, Abdul Badayuni clearly asserts the same. Not only does this, but he also provides several instances where she would exercise her influence on him. As per Badayuni, she insisted that Akbar was never to keep beard and must refrain from people having same, after which Badayuni says he took it as a special mark of devotion if people would shave their beards. Later Badayuni, being a bigot and conservative Muslim himself, laments her and claims that she had performed some magic on Akbar. He believed that Akbar's Hindu wives and chief of them, Shahi Begum, daughter of Raja Bharmal, distorted Akbar's faith in his religion. Much to her vexation, she alongside a few other Hindu wives expressed to Akbar her displeasure of him eating beef, onion, and garlic which Akbar agreed to refrain from. This as per Badayuni, Akbar conceded to in order to gain their love, goodwill, and trust of their caste. She was one of the people who influenced Akbar for the promotion of secularism alongside his mother and Birbal, as noted by Badayuni. Two people who have been blamed by Badayuni for inciting Akbar to promote secular culture were primarily Birbal and the daughter of Raja Bharmal. He even laments Akbar for being so influenced by her and says Akbar has fallen into the trap of the daughter of Raja Biharimal. Badayuni also notes about her beauty. As per Hadi, she was an extremely beautiful woman possessing uncommon beauty. Badayuni also criticizes Akbar for joining her occasionally in her prayers. This has furthermore been cited by Findly too. It was also Badayuni who notes the statement of Akbar where he called her piece of the moon. In addition to this, there are various other pieces he cites. In Akbarnama too, she has been praised several times throughout, she is described as an intelligent, auspicious, chaste, and graceful woman. Her status as senior consort is also noted by Abul Fazl in Akbarnama declaring her as a wife who commanded a very high rank in the Imperial harem. Abul Fazl also notes her accompanying Akbar during his various campaigns, the same piece has also been affirmed by Badayuni.

I hope I have cleared your charge of editors having portrayed the popular culture Jodha bai and not citing factual details and illustrating her in all authenticity. I would nonetheless welcome you to assist all the editors of her page in removing statements that do not stand Misplaced Pages terms and support any editor's predispositions. Kindly be ascertained that we permit no editor to add or remove any information which we find not conforming with the reference or is cited without any reference. I for myself am not a big fan of Akbar nonetheless I do adhere to maintaining a neutral approach to my edits here and citing information as per my readings with proper reference. About Akbar's bigotry, it without any question is very much evident. We both can very much agree to the same. If you are willing to cite the same feel free to edit Akbar's page and cite it from the source that proclaims the same but we do not have the freedom to state our impressions on this platform. Thank you Nush1125 (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Partial block

You have been blocked for two months from editing Persecution of Hindus. Misplaced Pages goes by reliable sources only (modern historians) and uses a neutral tone in articles; your recent tendentious editing with mainly Raj-era sources and aggressive edit summaries is unacceptable in several ways. Note that you can still discuss on the article's talkpage and try to get consensus for your preferred text. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 08:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC).