Misplaced Pages

User talk:GRBerry: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:32, 12 January 2007 editGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits restore 2007 portions of archived talk page← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:32, 8 April 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,899 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=May 2010}}
* ]
* ]
* ]


<!--{{administrator}}
==Six Laws of Adam==
]-->


<!--<small> ] • {{tl|ChristianityWikiProject}} • ]<br/> ] • </small>-->
First of all Mazel Tov on the mop n bucket!!! Hope you become an asset to WP. About getting the above article undeleted, must I now find the exact ] in the Talmud and section name in ]? ] 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


I was also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects might be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. However, I am not now active on any project. ] I also signed up for single user login.
== Westinghosue reversion? ==


{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"
I don't understand why you reverted, without explanation of any kind, the speedy-delete tag I had added to ]. It's a peculiar and unlikely typo, one of the criteria for speedy deletion. ] 07:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
|-
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''31''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
|-
|}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 3
|algo = old(31d)
|archive = User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11
}}
<!--'''Email advice:''' When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. ]-->


{{tocright}}
:Ultimately, because I didn't even see the typo while I was processing the CSD category. Additionally, CSD R3, to which you refer, only applies to recently created created redirects. October 2005 is beyond my understanding of recently created, so I'm not going to reverse myself. ] 14:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
<small>

* ]
::So, you recommend keeping a random typo page? Instead of just undoing the speedy-delete, why don't you do something useful and practical like nominating it however you feel a page of that nature ''should'' be? I don't understand why you're taking such a patronizing tone -- I was just trying to help. "So I'm not going to reverse myself." Sheesh. ] 02:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
* ]

* ]
:::My apologies that you saw a patronizing tone in my response; I did not intend one. I don't think it is worth getting rid of the typo, so I'm not going to spend the time no nominate it on ]. ] 03:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
''At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.''

* ]
::::Whatever (you're doing it again) . . . I don't understand why people on here can't be appreciative of others trying to help. Some of you frequent editors get these egos about yourselves with some sort of sense of entitlement. Telling me that you are granting "apologies" because ''I'' saw a patronizing tone is just repeating the slight. I thought, as an administrator, you were supposed help other editors out. If you see something that's been mistakenly misnominated, instead of invoking a flippant veto (as if you're some sort of terminal voice), it would be far more helpful if you would use your experience and expertise to a.) not make others feel foolish or ignorant, and b.) aid others through the bureaucracy. I'm not asking for you to even defend yourself here -- I'm just looking for you to be helpful. ] 03:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
* ]

* ]
==]==
* ]
This person deleted my new page 'fresh frozen seafood for' copyright violations, he said
* ]

* ]
well PAL. i made the web page the info came from
* ]
as an Evangelical you claim to be, I have doubts about ANY information you expouse
* ]
with the experience IO have had with 'these types' in Latin America your rhetoric falls short, and the ceiling of your educational abailities is always in doubt, especially your openness to other's creed and beliefs
''In Q4 2008 voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools and also am not actively editing nor do I intend to be actively editing again.''

</small>
I am Buddhist I assume you may have seen this on my pages and deleted because of this
leave my mess alone PAL
you know more about seafood than us? I seriously doubt it
I will repost, and leave it alone, then you will not have a problemo, delete it again, expect a visit, this is a promise, not a threat
and there are other religions on this planet other than you evangelicals
go edit something else, <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP -->

:An obvious G11 as advertising, never mind that the article may have been also a copyright violation. ] 16:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks for the help on Red Paint People ==

I was going through my contribute list, and noticed your generous additions: it took a over a year for anyone to give it a good makeover. ] 01:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

== Re:Deletion Review for Khalil Kalfat ==

The problem is that I am busy right now in real life. I am currently maintaining 48 articles (the articles I have created). I don't have time to look after another article. Most of my contributions are related to WikiProject Egypt which is just starting. Also, I don't know much about him. The information provided in the four links are enough to create a Start-Class article or at least Stub-Class but we will have to carefully write the article so that it is not a copyright violation. How about placing him in ]?

--] 04:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

:Another thing, since you are an administrator, I have tagged about 20 articles for speedy deletion. Could you please delete them? They are the most recent articles in ]. Their edit summary is: ''Adding speedy template''. Thank you.

:--] 04:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

== Thank you for your consideration ==

Thank you for the consideration you gave to ]. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA . Yours was one of the neutral votes, and raised concerns. I am more than willing to discuss those concerns with you if you are interested. Please let me know. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 13:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

== re: ] ==

Thanks for the notice. ] <small>]</small> 03:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

==Re: Saint Mary's DRV==
First, as I also posted on the DRV, you made the point that someone could still merge/redirect the article after the AfD was closed as a keep. In fact, this was attempted, but reverted soon after as failure to adhere to the closure. Second, you admit that the only point made by keep !voters was passage of WP:SCHOOL, which the article does not, so how can you urge to endorse the closure or endorse a no consensus when 1) there's a clear consensus, and 2) those going against the consensus do not provide sufficient reasoning for doing so? Cheers. -- ] 17:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
::Also, as far as the first point, please note that, in my DRV nomination, I state "overturn and delete or redirect"; thus, I would support redirecting the page if this had been allowed by other users (which, clearly, it is not). -- ] 17:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
::: The delete arguments ''actually made'' in the AFD are not really any better, so I don't see the strength of arguments that you, and others, see. A bunch of NN per noms, one to WP:SCHOOLS3 which is also a proposal, and most validly some "no assertion of notability", with which the keep opiners differed. Nobody opining delete actually said "I can't find any sources and here is how I tried", so ] was not in play so far as I'm concerned. Had those arguments been made, we'd be evaluating a different discussion. But if all we see are "no it isn't", "yes it is", I can't use strength of arguments to evaluate the close. ] 17:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
::::I understand your point regarding WP:V. Nobody really gave a good argument supporting verification nor supporting the lack thereof; thus, it's really impossible to judge the AfD on the basis of ''discussion''. Of course, I would then argue that the AfD closure should be analyzed based on head count, which, in my opinion, shows a consensus. 72.7% is in a slightly grey area, but I would argue that it's a strong enough consensus to overturn the AfD closure.
::::I hope that you don't think that I'm attempting to badger you so as to change your !vote in the DRV. You, of course, are welcome to your own opinions, just as I am and everyone else is. I'd like it if you reevaluated your stance, but if you don't, it's all good. I will certainly respect your opinion either way. Have a nice day. -- ] 18:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

==vote on deletion==

Hi GRBerry. If you have time please revisit ]. More information has been added to establish his notability. Thanks. ] 03:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

==Thank You!==

Thank you for helping me get started on wikipedia!

] 22:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


;New sections belong at the bottom, not here.
:Sorry. :( :( :( I'm leaving[REDACTED] for good, I'm having lots of trouble with other people. Sorry again. Goodbye. I'm the one who you helped by putting all that stuff on my page. Actually maybe I'll run for being an Admin.


==Merger discussion for ]==
:] 00:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
] An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;]&mdash;has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 12:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:32, 8 April 2022

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. GRBerry has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.


I was also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects might be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. However, I am not now active on any project. GRBerry diffmeta diff I also signed up for single user login.

This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.

In Q4 2008 voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools and also am not actively editing nor do I intend to be actively editing again.

New sections belong at the bottom, not here.

Merger discussion for University of Windsor Students' Alliance

An article that you have been involved in editing—University of Windsor Students' Alliance—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. RoyalObserver (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories:
User talk:GRBerry: Difference between revisions Add topic