Revision as of 13:03, 24 December 2009 editGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits →Happy Holidays: thanks, mc^2← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:32, 8 April 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,690 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11) (bot | ||
(26 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=May 2010}} | |||
<!--{{administrator}} | <!--{{administrator}} | ||
]--> | ]--> | ||
<small> ] • {{tl|ChristianityWikiProject}} • ]<br/> ] • </small> | <!--<small> ] • {{tl|ChristianityWikiProject}} • ]<br/> ] • </small>--> | ||
I |
I was also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects might be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. However, I am not now active on any project. ] I also signed up for single user login. | ||
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
|archive = User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11 | |archive = User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11 | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Email advice:''' When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. ] | <!--'''Email advice:''' When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. ]--> | ||
{{tocright}} | {{tocright}} | ||
Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
'' |
''In Q4 2008 voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools and also am not actively editing nor do I intend to be actively editing again.'' | ||
</small> | </small> | ||
;New sections belong at the bottom, not here. | ;New sections belong at the bottom, not here. | ||
==Merger discussion for ]== | |||
== Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop == | |||
] An article that you have been involved in editing—]—has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 12:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
As you participated in the recent ] election, or in one of two ] that relate to the use of ] for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the ]. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.<br/> | |||
<br/> | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, <br/> | |||
] (]) 08:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0005 --> | |||
==]== | |||
Hello, | |||
I have recently been editing the above article. There is some question in my mind whether Misplaced Pages should have the article at all. However, as i say , I believe that if WP is to have such an article, that all sides of this controversial subject should be covered. Would you mind giving an opinion? Thank you, ] (]) 01:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Help with notability issue on Häagen-Dazs article? == | |||
Hi Glenn. | |||
Re: ]. | |||
I appreciate any revieww, nput, insight, or help you could offer here, as an editor +/or as an admin. Is this a case where some level of article protection is called for? I thought of pointing then @ wikinews, but don't edit or use it, so don't know if it fits there. I note the article has other issues and needs. I prefer you reply here, not my talk page, to keep our discussion in one place. Thanks either way. yilfs, ] (]) 12:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:And the article hasn't been touched in the last day. Hopefully, I clued a few editors into what WP is really about. Thanks anyway. ] (]) 23:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I spoke too soon. Your review would be appreciated. Note one of the editors has made deletions to ], The GCC/GNU diff part hould probably be reversed. | |||
I support Lentower's request for inputs. The discussion among just the two of us is not getting anywhere. Regarding the article he started on himself, even if we reverse the GCC/diff part, I think we should definitely leave out stuff about him never owning a car because that seems to be irrelevant, unsourced and self-aggrandizing. ] (]) 12:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:He may have started it, but the community reviewed and decided that he merited an article. That issue was addressed years ago in AFD #2. he first AFD was erroneously closed, as the DRV I started established. | |||
:On the gnu diff, you misunderstood the citations in the article. The cite in the lead to his autobiography was for the cyclist/pedestrian/never a car bit. The cite for the gnu diff part was in the GNU Project section of the article and was to an authoritative primary source. Actually, that cite is still in that section of the article. The fact was in the lead without citation there, which is perfectly acceptable when it is cited in the body of the article. Without the cyclist/pedestrian bit, the sentence would need rewording if that fact remained in the lead. I don't have a strong opinion on whether it should be in the lead or only in the body; I could be satisfied either way. | |||
:On the cyclist bit; if Len were known for being a big industry spokesperson or an environmental activist, we'd call it relevant to his notability and keep it in. For his actual notability in free software, it was a fact that humanized and made his biography more interesting, but certainly isn't a requirement to have in the article at all. | |||
:Also, it is troublesome wikietiquette to get involved in a dispute with another editor and then go edit a biography about them. Over the years, we've seen some serious abuses by editors doing that, and other times where they found real problems that needed addressing in the biography. I believe that best practice is always to get a second opinion from a neutral party ''before'' editing the biography of an editor with whom one is in a dispute, and preferably to leave it to them to edit instead of doing it yourself. | |||
:I know this article, so it is easy for me to reply to quickly. The Haagen-Dazs article will take longer for me to figure out what is going on... ] 23:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Holidays == | |||
Haven't seen you around lately, but I just wanted to wish a Merry Christmas, Happy New Year's, and Happy Holidays to you and your family. Best wishes, and I hope things are going well. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 05:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Hi MastCell. Good to see you again. You probably haven't seen me because I really haven't been here. Thank you for remembering me. I hope all is going well with you also. Merry Christmas. ] 13:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:32, 8 April 2022
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. GRBerry has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I was also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects might be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. However, I am not now active on any project. GRBerry diffmeta diff I also signed up for single user login.
This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
- Archive 1: April 20 to June 26, 2006
- Archive 2: June 27 to September 10, 2006
- Archive 3: September 11 to December 30, 2006
At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.
- Archive 4: December 31, 2006 to January 27, 2007
- Archive 5: January 31, 2007 to May 31, 2007
- Archive 6: June 1, 2007 to September 1, 2007
- Archive 7: September 2, 2007 to October 29, 2007
- Archive 8: October 30, 2007 to December 31, 2007
- Archive 9: January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
- Archive 10: April 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008
- Archive 11: September 1, 2008 to ongoing
In Q4 2008 voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools and also am not actively editing nor do I intend to be actively editing again.
- New sections belong at the bottom, not here.
Merger discussion for University of Windsor Students' Alliance
An article that you have been involved in editing—University of Windsor Students' Alliance—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. RoyalObserver (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories: