Revision as of 03:29, 3 February 2008 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits →Civility: clarifying← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:01, 5 June 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(502 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|date=August 2016}} | |||
==Welcome== | |||
{{Usertalkconcise}} | |||
Hello. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. . | |||
__TOC__ | |||
See our ] to become acquainted with Misplaced Pages, and move on to the ] which, I think, gives some ''very'' good information about editing that all ] should read. | |||
---- | |||
There are lots of ways you can help with the encyclopedia; check out ] to find out how. | |||
== Pedophilia == | |||
If you have any questions, you can ask on ], check ], or leave {{tnull|helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will be around to help shortly. Again, welcome, and happy editing! <span style="font-family: Verdana">]</span> 06:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Hello Jack, you don't think the 10 or so sources in ] justify the activism cat per ]? ] (]) 22:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Your edits and comments on ] are appreciated == | |||
:No, the ] article does not belong in ]. It's a science article. Putting it in that category would create an incorrect impression of the article content and a false impression that that might be something other than ] in that category topic. There is only one short paragraph about pedophile advocacy groups in the article. That paragraph has many sources because it came from an article that no longer exists - its current form is the result of a consensus process that removed the influence of disruptive editing by editors who have since then been banned. In addition, the references that are cited in that section do not use the term "activism". The section heading in the article should be changed to something more in accord with the sources. --] (]) 23:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Ah. Does this have something to do with the predator infiltration that Fox News commented on? ] (]) 23:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, sort of, though much of that story was years out of date and some of the facts were inaccurate, so take it with a grain of salt. That said, because of past editing disruptions, this topic area requires especially careful attention to reliable sources and avoidance of undue weight. -] (]) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::Ironic, based on this thread I created the FAQ at NAMBLA, which you voted to delete. ] (]) 22:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::If it seems ironic to you, that may be because you don't know the full history of the topic area. The ] is important and carefully worded. It stands on its own and the FAQ is not a helpful addition. --] (]) 06:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | |||
As one of the designers of the previous lead, your take on this matter is needed. ] (]) 16:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Parental Alienation Syndrome == | |||
So please do not feel your input is being ignored. IMO your response was measured and well expressed. The revision of your edit was not due any problem with you. There has been much division between editors on this article. Extraordinary levels of debate and emotion have been a constant theme there, and it has taken a lot of effort to keep the article from edit warring. I believe I should probably have taken more time to consider how to word the external links template so it clearly indicated multiple ] inputs may be needed to settle the issue among the editors. I firmly believe your input will be considered when the issue is resolved. Thanks again. ] 17:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
The tagging of the ] article with PAW has become the subject of debate on its talk page; specifically, I identified it as vandalism and removed it and was reverted. It was subsequently determined that you are the user who added the tag in 2008 and are an active member of the PAW project (hence, at a minimum, it was not vandalism.) It would seem that, as such, you or one of your peers is the "final arbiter" of which articles belong in the project. Could you re-evaluate the article (it has changed significantly since 2008 when some comments related to pedophilia were being added to it) and determine if you still feel it belongs as part of PAW (a tag that, with all due respect seems very pejorative.) And if you feel that it does, would you be so kind as to provide some insight as to why? Many thanks--] (]) 05:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks! == | |||
:I've removed the tag and added a comment on the article talk page. The PAW project is inactive now and the new version of the article doesn't appear to need that kind of monitoring at this time anyway. But aside from that, I don't see the tag as perjorative, I certainly never used it that way. It's a management tool. Those topics are difficult, but they exist and have to be managed like any other group of topics. The PAS article refers to child sexual abuse as a component of the early definitions of the PAS term, and in past versions of the article that part of the text was more prominent, that's probably why the tag was there. --] (]) 08:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== GL == | |||
Thanks for correcting my error on the ] page. Much obliged! ] (]) 19:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
I expanded some of my original points at the GL talk page, after your edit (which I didn't see). Hope you don't mind. ] (]) 04:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Barnstar == | |||
== WikiProject Sociology membership == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Exceptional Newcomer Award''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Impressive for someone with less than 200 edits! ] (]) 20:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
I see that within the last year you have made at least one substantial comment at ], but you have not added yourself to the project's ]. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter ]). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 13:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
What a cool surprise! Thanks a lot! --] (]) 20:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== (:}) == | |||
:Shouldn't be a surprise, you're doing a great job and should expect, nay, demand! recognition. But you won't get it, so here's a barnstar instead. Also, if you like long reads, I've an ] I composed for noobs, you might find some useful stuff in it. Though maybe not given the quality of your contributions to date... ] (]) 21:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Hi. I hope you haven't forgotten that WP needs balanced, insightful contributors like yourself. As always I'm on the point of going but maybe our paths will cross again some day. Oh and - hope you like my new name! ] (]) 08:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::Some people put their preference at the top of the talk page, others do not. Generally I watch most user talk pages I post on and look for a reply when I've left a message. If I get a quick reply (i.e. we're posting in realtime) I usually bounce back and forth between reading on mine and replying on the other person's. If I'm not sure about a reply but it's important and I've replied on my own talk page, I usually leave a note on the person's talk page saying the reply is there. It usually works out, if it's important you'll tell them or make a point of reading their reply. ] (]) 21:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Da hell? == | |||
== merge proposal for complementary and alternative medicine articles == | |||
What kind of "semi-wikibreak" lasts eleven months? | |||
Due to your comments in talk, how about removing the merge proposal for complementary and alternative medicine articles '''banner''' from the article itself? -- ] (]) 20:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Miss ya! ] (]) 06:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
::How about the ] and ] banners? -- ] (]) 20:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== False Memory Syndrome Foundation == | |||
== Thank you == | |||
Hi there! I noticed on the ] that you have contributed to the article. I just wanted to let you know that I ] and I would love to hear your opinion on the deletion page. | |||
Hi, Jack-A-Roe. I was just skimming the latest thread on the Bleep Talk page. I really appreciate your moderating influence. Thanks so much. ] (]) 12:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thanks!! ] <small>]</small> 03:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested) == | |||
== Melon heads == | |||
], who generously ] to Misplaced Pages editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Misplaced Pages editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that: | |||
Jack, thanks for contributing to the Melon Heads deletion talk. it's a long discussion to follow, but you'll note that the sources that you mention are the main point of contention RE: keeping vs. deleting part of the article: their reliability as valid sources is in question. Refer to the debate for more information.--] (]) 23:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
* Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): | |||
:OK, I reviewed the discussion further and found another newspaper article. I've added a follow-up comment at the AfD. --] (]) 00:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve. | |||
== Oops! == | |||
At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through ]). | |||
Hi! | |||
Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot. | |||
Sorry for accidentally reverting some changes you had made -- I had only looked at the top rev and didn't see that you had been working on it ... Sorry :) | |||
If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 17:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Moogle10000 08:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0298 --> | |||
== Pro-pedophile activism listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pro-pedophile activism'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> —] (]) 14:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Wiki Medicine == | |||
:No worries - thanks for catching that and restoring my edits. --] (]) 08:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Hi<p>I'm contacting you because, as a participant at ], you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at ]. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's ].<p>Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and ] - including ]. <p>Hope to see you there! --] (]) 08:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
==WP Search engine== | |||
Many thanks for this unexpected link, Jack, much appreciated; it looks good, I will use it and collate responses. thanks again! ] 09:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
== The Misplaced Pages Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!) == | |||
==NPOV Header in Lolicon Article== | |||
I noticed that you recently to the article on ]. Could you possibly explain how the neutrality of the text therein is biased or questioned? To me, it looks like a fair and balanced article. Thank you in advance, ~ ] (]) 19:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{WP:TWL/Header}} | |||
:Thanks for asking. As this is a question about the content of the article, I will reply on the article talk page. --] (]) 20:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
The Misplaced Pages Library gets Misplaced Pages editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. | |||
::Instead of a further reply, I removed the tag. The issues I had been concerned about were resolved by recent edits. If a problem surfaces again, I'll mention it on the talk page. Hope that's helpful. --] (]) 20:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
*''']''' is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library. | |||
*Cochrane has generously agreed to give ''free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors''. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. | |||
*'''If you are still active as a medical editor, come and ]''' | |||
Cheers, ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 20:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0549 --> | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 22:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Books and Bytes: The Misplaced Pages Library Newsletter == | |||
== January 2008 == | |||
{{{icon|] }}}Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Adult-child sex|, as you did to ]}}. We have some ] to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the Misplaced Pages. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-move2 --> ''Please seek ] for further assistance, for this potentially controversial move. Furthermore, a comment has been made at ANI ].'' ] <small>(]) (])</small> 05:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border: 2px dashed #ADC2E4; margin: 1px; padding: 1em 2% 1em"> | |||
:Thanks, I'm aware of the discussions and the ANI posting. There was a discussion with consensus of approximately 8 editors agreeing about the redirect. I was one of several editors who restored the redirect after it had been undone without consensus. The discussion is continuing on the talk page of the article and at ANI. I'm sure they'll sort it out OK. --] (]) 05:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div class="center"><big><big><big>''''']'''''</big></big></big> | |||
<p>Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013</p> | |||
] | |||
<p>by {{user|The Interior}}, {{user|Ocaasi}}</p></div> | |||
<big>'''Greetings ] members!'''</big> Welcome to the inaugural edition of ''Books and Bytes'', TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of ''Books and Bytes'', please add your name to ]. There's lots of news this month for the Misplaced Pages Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... | |||
<p>'''New positions:''' Sign up to be a Misplaced Pages Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Misplaced Pages Librarian</p> | |||
<p>'''Misplaced Pages Loves Libraries:''' Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.</p> | |||
<p>'''New subscription donations:''' Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??</p> | |||
<p>'''New ideas:''' OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges</p> | |||
<p>'''News from the library world:''' Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY</p> | |||
<p>'''Announcing WikiProject Open:''' WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions</p> | |||
<p>'''New ways to get involved:''' Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration</p> | |||
<p><big>]</big></p><br> | |||
''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be '''opt-in''' only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the ]. --] 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)'' | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0651 --> | |||
== The Misplaced Pages Library Survey == | |||
:: All I am seeing is the ], could you direct me to the general consensus regarding the page move? All else holding though, going to RM might provide a better solution, to save edit warring and the whole page move mess (since the discussions are not being merged over). ] <small>(]) (])</small> 05:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
As a subscriber to one of ]'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this Thanks and cheers, ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 15:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::In the section at ], at the time when the move was first made, there were 7 editors agreeing it should be done, and only 2 dissenting. Now that the multiple reversions have been happening, there appear to be 3 editors arguing to keep it, plus there was one who reverted the change a few days ago but who has not added any new comments. | |||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0678 --> | |||
== The Pulse (] newsletter) June 2014 == | |||
:::That doesn't include your position, which I don't know. It seemed like your comment was mostly about procedure and not about the article itself, so I didn't count you on either side of the question in this summary. | |||
The first edition of '''The Pulse''' has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. ''']''' | |||
:::So now it's less clear than it was when the first change was done, though there is still a rough consensus to redirect. I'm not going to edit war about it. However, the article title is misleading and there are no ] sources supporting the term "adult-child sex" in any context other than child abuse. Eventually, as Misplaced Pages winds its way through process, the article will not last, unless there is a big surprise and someone finds reliable sources that have been hiding previously even though there's been ongoing searches, and that's not likely in the long run, because it's a fringe theory and has no scientific support. --] (]) 05:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::: I see. I was an uninvolved editor who noted the incident at ANI, and came in to at least diffuse the situation on both sides. I have no stance on the issue currently. ] <small>(]) (])</small> 05:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Thanks for clarifying on that. I notice the page is protected now. That's a good thing to allow time for things to calm down and for more editors to comment on the main issue. --] (]) 06:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of ] members bearing the {{tl|User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, ] or simply remove your name from ]. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message ]. | |||
== RMT == | |||
{{small|Posted by ] (]) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of ].}} | |||
Nice clean up there - this area seems so difficult to keep clarity in - I find myself extrapolating from sources too easily. ] (]) 08:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Evad37@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Medicine/Newsletter/Mailing_list&oldid=610857270 --> | |||
== BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Misplaced Pages medical editors == | |||
== AfD issues == | |||
Neat news: '''] is offering 25 free, full-access accounts''' to their prestigious medical journal through ] and ] (like we did with ]). Please sign up this week: ] --Cheers, ] via ] (]) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Hello - I don't want to edit war with anyone on where their comments should be, possibly the best solution would be moving the rest of that particular thread back if you think its necessary. Folks have moved stuff back and forth enough that I imagine its a bit hard to follow, but even disjointed everything is there for the closing admin to see. I think its a pretty clear no-consensus close, however, so I don't know that any additional work at the AfD is warranted. <sup>]]</sup> 03:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ocaasi@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Medicine/Newsletter/Mailing_list&oldid=610857270 --> | |||
== Medical Translation Newsletter == | |||
Ah, thanks. <sup>]]</sup> 04:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<br><div style = "color: #F4C430; font-size: 3.5em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> | |||
== DRV == | |||
] | |||
'''Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce''' | |||
</div> | |||
<div style = "font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px"> | |||
] | |||
<div style = "line-height: 1.2"> | |||
Yep, you are correct thank you. ] (]) 03:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''''Medical Translation Newsletter'''''</span><br /> | |||
==RfM filed== | |||
Issue 1, June/July 2014<br> | |||
A ] has been filed on the continuing dispute over the ] of this article. You have been listed as an involved party, please respond on the mediation page at your earliest convenience. ] <small>]</small> 19:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
by ], ] | |||
</div> | |||
== Civility == | |||
'']'' | |||
{{clear}}</div><br> | |||
<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #0000FF; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> | |||
]] | |||
<big><big>This is the first of a series of newsletters for ]. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Misplaced Pages available to the world, in the language of '''your''' choice.</big></big> | |||
Hi JAR, | |||
''note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *]*; you received this version because you identify as a ]''{{clear}} | |||
<!-- Spotlight --> | |||
{{anchor|Spotlight}} | |||
<big><big>'''Spotlight - Simplified article translation'''</big></big> | |||
---- | |||
Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 ] ready for translation, of which the first on ] or ''sleeping sickness'' has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in ]. | |||
Our goal is to eventually translate '''1,000''' simplified articles. This includes: | |||
Just a note, you seem to be tackling some controversial areas of[REDACTED] (both in real-world terms and in wiki-terms, a la CAM). You also seem to be doing an unusual job in that your comments seem to be very neutral and civil. Good stuff, you get e-props. | |||
*WHO's list of ] | |||
*] | |||
*Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: ], ] ('']''), ], ], ], etc. | |||
We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially '''integrate''' medical articles. | |||
Oh, and I've popped into the ] page. It's awful. Blech. If you're still editing, see you there. I'm also back on the ] page. I don't think you are. But if you're still editing, I'll see you there as well : ) ] (]) 21:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- News --> | |||
:Good to hear from you, thanks for your note. Those are a couple challenging pages, that's for sure! I'll check in over there when I have a chance. --] (]) 19:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{anchor|News}} | |||
<big>'''What's happening?'''</big> | |||
---- | |||
;IEG grant | |||
] - "IEG beneficiary" and editor of this newsletter.]] | |||
I've (''{{U|CFCF}}'') taken on the role of ''community organizer'' for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found '']'', and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by '']'' or on my '']''. | |||
;Wikimania 2014 | |||
::On those pages I keep vacillating between 'hideous wastes of time full of unreasonable POV-pushing SPA accounts' and 'the best and most rewarding work I've ever done on wikipedia'. In any case, civility has been a huge help, and seeing a newcomer like yourself maintaining your cool is inspiring. Kudos, and thanks for the excellent example! ] (]) 03:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See , which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors. | |||
;Integration progress | |||
There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Misplaced Pages presence, such as ], ], and ]. <br>What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not ] (],],],]) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content. | |||
*Swedish<br>Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: , . The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and 💕 of medical content. We want Misplaced Pages to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.<br>Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May. | |||
*Dutch<br>Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Misplaced Pages is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: '']''. | |||
*Polish<br>Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Misplaced Pages has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Misplaced Pages does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.<br> (''This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned - to be released''). - '']'' | |||
*Arabic<br>The Arabic Misplaced Pages community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Misplaced Pages facebook-groups: , something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm. | |||
;Integration guides | |||
Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis. | |||
Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here | |||
<!-- News in short --> | |||
{{anchor|News short}}{{anchor|short}}{{anchor|News in short}} | |||
<big>'''News in short'''</big> | |||
---- | |||
;To come | |||
*Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available '']''. | |||
*Proofreading drives | |||
<!--Medical editors from various Wikiprojects can be added, or add themselves to ].--> | |||
<!-- Further reading --> | |||
{{anchor|Further reading}} | |||
<!-- Some links should be placed here--> | |||
;Further reading | |||
* | |||
*, ''a global campaign'' | |||
<br> | |||
<!-- Header --> | |||
{{WP:Medical Translation/Header}}<br> | |||
{{Quote box | |||
|quote = ''Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the '''Medical Translation Newsletter''', please add your name to ]. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, {{user|CFCF}} at ].<br>Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me {{user|CFCF}}<br>For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see ''']''''' | |||
<br>''If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the ], or ] on meta''. 22:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
|align=center}}{{clear}}</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ocaasi@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:WikiProject_Medicine_members --> | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692071653 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> |
Latest revision as of 10:01, 5 June 2022
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Jack-A-Roe has not edited Misplaced Pages since August 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome to Jack-A-Roe's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. |
Pedophilia
Hello Jack, you don't think the 10 or so sources in Pedophilia#Pedophile_activism justify the activism cat per Misplaced Pages:Category#Categorizing_pages? Lionel (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- No, the Pedophilia article does not belong in Category:Pedophile activism. It's a science article. Putting it in that category would create an incorrect impression of the article content and a false impression that that might be something other than fringe ideas in that category topic. There is only one short paragraph about pedophile advocacy groups in the article. That paragraph has many sources because it came from an article that no longer exists - its current form is the result of a consensus process that removed the influence of disruptive editing by editors who have since then been banned. In addition, the references that are cited in that section do not use the term "activism". The section heading in the article should be changed to something more in accord with the sources. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Does this have something to do with the predator infiltration that Fox News commented on? Lionel (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, sort of, though much of that story was years out of date and some of the facts were inaccurate, so take it with a grain of salt. That said, because of past editing disruptions, this topic area requires especially careful attention to reliable sources and avoidance of undue weight. -Jack-A-Roe (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ironic, based on this thread I created the FAQ at NAMBLA, which you voted to delete. Lionel (talk) 22:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- If it seems ironic to you, that may be because you don't know the full history of the topic area. The child protection policy is important and carefully worded. It stands on its own and the FAQ is not a helpful addition. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ironic, based on this thread I created the FAQ at NAMBLA, which you voted to delete. Lionel (talk) 22:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, sort of, though much of that story was years out of date and some of the facts were inaccurate, so take it with a grain of salt. That said, because of past editing disruptions, this topic area requires especially careful attention to reliable sources and avoidance of undue weight. -Jack-A-Roe (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Does this have something to do with the predator infiltration that Fox News commented on? Lionel (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Pedophilia#Proposals for new lead
As one of the designers of the previous lead, your take on this matter is needed. Flyer22 (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Parental Alienation Syndrome
The tagging of the Parental Alienation Syndrome article with PAW has become the subject of debate on its talk page; specifically, I identified it as vandalism and removed it and was reverted. It was subsequently determined that you are the user who added the tag in 2008 and are an active member of the PAW project (hence, at a minimum, it was not vandalism.) It would seem that, as such, you or one of your peers is the "final arbiter" of which articles belong in the project. Could you re-evaluate the article (it has changed significantly since 2008 when some comments related to pedophilia were being added to it) and determine if you still feel it belongs as part of PAW (a tag that, with all due respect seems very pejorative.) And if you feel that it does, would you be so kind as to provide some insight as to why? Many thanks--Cybermud (talk) 05:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've removed the tag and added a comment on the article talk page. The PAW project is inactive now and the new version of the article doesn't appear to need that kind of monitoring at this time anyway. But aside from that, I don't see the tag as perjorative, I certainly never used it that way. It's a management tool. Those topics are difficult, but they exist and have to be managed like any other group of topics. The PAS article refers to child sexual abuse as a component of the early definitions of the PAS term, and in past versions of the article that part of the text was more prominent, that's probably why the tag was there. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 08:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
GL
I expanded some of my original points at the GL talk page, after your edit (which I didn't see). Hope you don't mind. McZeus (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Sociology membership
I see that within the last year you have made at least one substantial comment at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Sociology, but you have not added yourself to the project's official member list. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter here). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 13:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
(:})
Hi. I hope you haven't forgotten that WP needs balanced, insightful contributors like yourself. As always I'm on the point of going but maybe our paths will cross again some day. Oh and - hope you like my new name! McZeus (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Da hell?
What kind of "semi-wikibreak" lasts eleven months?
Miss ya! Herostratus (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
False Memory Syndrome Foundation
Hi there! I noticed on the FMSF talk page that you have contributed to the article. I just wanted to let you know that I nominated it for deletion and I would love to hear your opinion on the deletion page. Thanks!! /-\urelius ♠ |)ecimus What's 03:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Misplaced Pages editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Misplaced Pages editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
- Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.
At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).
Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.
If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi 17:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Pro-pedophile activism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-pedophile activism. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-pedophile activism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Tom Morris (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Medicine
Hi
I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.
Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.
Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Misplaced Pages Library gets Misplaced Pages editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
- Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
- Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
- If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi 20:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox topic terms
Template:Infobox topic terms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Misplaced Pages Library Newsletter
Books and BytesVolume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)
Greetings Misplaced Pages Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Misplaced Pages Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Misplaced Pages Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Misplaced Pages Librarian
Misplaced Pages Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Misplaced Pages Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 15:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.
The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.
BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Misplaced Pages medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Misplaced Pages Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Misplaced Pages:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Medical Translation Newsletter
Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce
Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 1, June/July 2014
by CFCF, Doc James
This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Misplaced Pages available to the world, in the language of your choice.
note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject MedicineSpotlight - Simplified article translation
Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.
Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
- WHO's list of Essential Medicines
- Neglected tropical diseases
- Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.
We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.
What's happening?
- IEG grant
I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
- Wikimania 2014
For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
- Integration progress
There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Misplaced Pages presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
- Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and 💕 of medical content. We want Misplaced Pages to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May. - Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Misplaced Pages is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie. - Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Misplaced Pages has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Misplaced Pages does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration - Arabic
The Arabic Misplaced Pages community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Misplaced Pages facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
- Integration guides
Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here
News in short
- To come
- Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
- Proofreading drives
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
Medical Translation
partners resources outreach get involved |
Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Categories: