Revision as of 22:41, 21 September 2011 editBhlegkorbh (talk | contribs)551 edits →Multiple renames, page moves etc...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:29, 21 September 2022 edit undoParadoctor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,999 edits Notification: listing of Vrilology at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
(39 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Talk page discussions at ] == | |||
==Multiple renames, page moves etc...== | |||
Hello there, I see you've been really busy over the last few hours making lots of changes to pages within the general area of paganism. There are really so many that there isn't an obvious central place to discuss them all with you, hence coming here! You've made some quite fundamental changes - eg and without discussing them on talk pages first - could I suggest that you discuss big moves like this first? (Your obvious redirects are a hood idea and much less problematic, good work on those). You may find that if you move first without discussion, your changes will just get quickly and frustratingly reverted. Best wishes, ] ] 21:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi Bhlegkorbh. I see that for many years you have been active over at the talk page for ]. There are a number of discussions being held at that article's talk page at the moment, regarding both a potential change to the title and regarding whether certain paragraphs should be included or not. If you had the time, your input on those issues (regardless of whether you support my own positions or completely oppose them) would be useful and gratefully received. Best, ] (]) 22:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Dear Kim Dent-Brown, first of all sorry for possible language mistakes; but English is not my mother tongue. Regarding my edits, I am a ] user, and when I think my edits are good, and well sourced, I do not hesitate in making them. :) --] (]) 22:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Regarding the move of ] to ] you may find a recent proposal . I've moved it to a far more popular term and adopted the terminology regulations discussed . | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692225944 --> | |||
== Re: Help needed on Germanic Neopaganism == | |||
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) Sorry; at that time, I was considering giving up on Misplaced Pages. I still don't edit much, though I did today for a while, I'll be going back to being not very active. Did that article ever improve how you wanted? I don't agree with the redirect to Heathenry, because technically, it could include some things like pagan German Idealist modern philosophy that some of it might be atheist or pantheist, etc.--] (]|]) 07:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
== "Balder Rising" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> (]) 12:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
== "Vrilology" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> (]) 12:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:29, 21 September 2022
Talk page discussions at Germanic neopaganism
Hi Bhlegkorbh. I see that for many years you have been active over at the talk page for Germanic neopaganism. There are a number of discussions being held at that article's talk page at the moment, regarding both a potential change to the title and regarding whether certain paragraphs should be included or not. If you had the time, your input on those issues (regardless of whether you support my own positions or completely oppose them) would be useful and gratefully received. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Re: Help needed on Germanic Neopaganism
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) Sorry; at that time, I was considering giving up on Misplaced Pages. I still don't edit much, though I did today for a while, I'll be going back to being not very active. Did that article ever improve how you wanted? I don't agree with the redirect to Heathenry, because technically, it could include some things like pagan German Idealist modern philosophy that some of it might be atheist or pantheist, etc.--dchmelik (t|c) 07:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Fallfest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallfest is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Fallfest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
"Balder Rising" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Balder Rising and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Balder Rising until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
"Vrilology" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vrilology and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Vrilology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 12:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)