Revision as of 19:42, 7 October 2022 editSunDawn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers67,863 edits →I have sent you a note about a page you started: new sectionTag: PageTriage← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:08, 8 October 2022 edit undoSubtropical-man (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users18,052 edits last warningNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
] ] 19:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC) | ] ] 19:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Adelaide == | |||
] | |||
OliveYouBean - Please stop ] and let this be resolved on the talk page. Your actions are destructive. They also break Misplaced Pages's standards on dispute resolution, incl. ] (if there is new edit, later is revert by other user = first must to be discuss and consensus to new changes). Your actions are a typical example that you trying to push a POV. | |||
You have made three offenses: . | |||
*1) You restore in the intro a text with an aboriginal name. According to the discuss and per many sources, name apply only for the centre area, this name is added to ] ). There is no consensus on the use of a center name as the name for the entire Greater Sydney area. | |||
*2) you put content into the first paragraph of the article about a selected group of people who had a minimal impact on the construction of a modern city and constitute a small percentage of the population - which is extreme breaks ]. I moved this data to third paragraph, but you moved to the first paragraph as the most important information about Greater Adelaide, without any consensus. | |||
*3) you are removed templates inserted by another user - templates have been inserted correctly. The content of Traditional Owners in the introduction to the article is still debatable (still under discussion), and the sources have also been questioned. Verification of the sources showed that they are inconsistent with the content of the article and a breaks rule of ] and ]. | |||
These are serious offenses. It's not that you have your own opinion. You are not allowed to break Misplaced Pages's rules. You restore wrong the sentence about the Aboriginal name of the city center and inserted it into the first paragraph of the article although not applicable Greater Adelaide + you have deleted templates inserted by another user - you have no right to delete them. You break ]. You put in the wrong sources and use OR. This behavior will not be tolerated. ] <span style="color: navy;">(] | <small>en-2</small>)</span> 09:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:08, 8 October 2022
OliveYouBean, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[REDACTED] |
Hi OliveYouBean! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:South Australia cricket team in 2021–22
Hello, OliveYouBean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Australia cricket team in 2021–22, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:2021 Adelaide Football Club season
Hello, OliveYouBean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Adelaide Football Club season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:South Australia cricket team in 2021–22
Hello, OliveYouBean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South Australia cricket team in 2021–22".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 06:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2021 Adelaide Football Club season
Hello, OliveYouBean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Adelaide Football Club season".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 06:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, OliveYouBean. Thank you for creating Nick Murray (footballer). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Adelaide
OliveYouBean - Please stop edit warring and let this be resolved on the talk page. Your actions are destructive. They also break Misplaced Pages's standards on dispute resolution, incl. Misplaced Pages:CYCLE (if there is new edit, later is revert by other user = first must to be discuss and consensus to new changes). Your actions are a typical example that you trying to push a POV. You have made three offenses: .
- 1) You restore in the intro a text with an aboriginal name. According to the discuss and per many sources, name apply only for the centre area, this name is added to Adelaide city centre ). There is no consensus on the use of a center name as the name for the entire Greater Sydney area.
- 2) you put content into the first paragraph of the article about a selected group of people who had a minimal impact on the construction of a modern city and constitute a small percentage of the population - which is extreme breaks Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. I moved this data to third paragraph, but you moved to the first paragraph as the most important information about Greater Adelaide, without any consensus.
- 3) you are removed templates inserted by another user - templates have been inserted correctly. The content of Traditional Owners in the introduction to the article is still debatable (still under discussion), and the sources have also been questioned. Verification of the sources showed that they are inconsistent with the content of the article and a breaks rule of Misplaced Pages:No original research and Misplaced Pages:Verifiability.
These are serious offenses. It's not that you have your own opinion. You are not allowed to break Misplaced Pages's rules. You restore wrong the sentence about the Aboriginal name of the city center and inserted it into the first paragraph of the article although not applicable Greater Adelaide + you have deleted templates inserted by another user - you have no right to delete them. You break Misplaced Pages:CYCLE. You put in the wrong sources and use OR. This behavior will not be tolerated. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 09:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)