Revision as of 17:26, 8 April 2017 editN I H I L I S T I C (talk | contribs)462 edits ←Created page with ''''Thin and thick libertarianism''' are two kinds of libertarianism. Thin libertarianism deals with legal issues involving the nonaggression principle only....' |
Latest revision as of 11:21, 27 October 2022 edit undoQueen of Hearts (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators33,433 edits Added {{R from merge}} and {{R to section}} tags to redirectTag: Twinkle |
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
'''Thin and thick libertarianism''' are two kinds of libertarianism. Thin libertarianism deals with legal issues involving the ] only. Thus, thin libertarianism would permit a person to be racist, homophobic, etc. as long as he did not support the ] against others.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Libertarian Alternative|author=Berg, Chris}}</ref> ] is an advocate of thin libertarianism.<ref>https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/insightful-critique-thick-libertarianism-thin-libertarian/</ref> ] describes thin libertarianism as "brutalism," which he compares unfavorably to "humanitarianism."<ref>http://reason.com/archives/2014/04/06/a-libertarian-opposition-to-racism</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
Thick libertarianism goes further, to also cover moral issues. Charles Johnson describes four kinds of thickness: thickness for application, thickness from grounds, strategic thickness, and thickness from consequences.<ref>https://fee.org/articles/libertarianism-through-thick-and-thin/</ref> Thick libertarianism is sometimes viewed as more humanitarian than thin libertarianism.<ref>http://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/tgif-in-praise-of-thick-libertarianism/</ref> ] has stated that she will leave the movement if thick libertarianism prevails.<ref>https://thelibertarianalliance.com/2014/08/13/wendy-mcelroy-i-will-leave-the-movement-if-thick-libertarianism-prevails/</ref> Thick libertarianism is sometimes described as rebranded leftism.<ref>https://christophercantwell.com/2014/05/12/thick-libertarian-strategy/</ref> |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
] rejects the dichotomy altogether, writing, "I have never found the thick-thin paradigm to be coherent, consistent, well-defined, necessary, or even useful. It’s full of straw men, or seems to try to take credit for quite obvious and uncontroversial assertions."<ref>http://www.stephankinsella.com/2014/04/the-limits-of-libertarianism-a-dissenting-view/</ref> |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|