Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cebr1979: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:13, 29 March 2016 view sourceSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,793 editsm typo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:19, 16 February 2023 view source MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Sockpuppet investigation==
== March 2016 ==
{{Ivmbox
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;] (]) 02:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)</div>
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:|&nbsp;]]<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)}}
<!-- Template:uw-aoablock -->
|]
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Whatever, see you in a week... When I'll present my evidence that ] creates her own sock puppets to look cool by tattling on them and making you all believe she's important. You clearly so you shouldn't be taking part in any conversation she starts 'cause you're obviously biased in her favour... Friendly tip: She freely admitted right that she creates fake profiles on facebook and... someone who creates fake profiles on one website... will obviously do it on another. Way to protect your friend! See you in a week! (and HEY: that's not the only time she's slipped up)] (]) 08:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | decline = As you have continued to make personal attacks in your unblock request, and you have a lengthy log of blocks for
}} ]]<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
making personal attacks, I have increased your block to 1 month. If I see any further personal attacks here I will also revoke your ability to edit this talk page. ] (]) 08:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Ya, alright! Doesn't change anything other than I'll be seeing you in a month instead of a week... When I'll present my evidence that ] creates her own sock puppets to look cool by tattling on them and making you all believe she's important. ] clearly so shouldn't be taking part in any conversation she starts 'cause he's obviously biased in her favour... Friendly tip: She freely admitted right that she creates fake profiles on facebook and... someone who creates fake profiles on one website... will obviously do it on another. See you in a month! (and HEY: that's not the only time she's slipped up) ] (]) 09:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC) | decline = Not an unblock request. -- ] (]) 09:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)}}


== ]: Voting now open! ==
*As promised, I have now revoked your ability to edit this talk page for the duration of the block because of your continued personal attacks. ] (]) 11:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
*Not only is it a repeated personal attack, but the claim "she creates fake profiles on facebook" is totally false—the link given shows no such thing, so Cebr1979 either misinterpreted the comment (failing ]), or attempted an outrageous smear-by-rumor. In either case, Cebr1979 should not be participating in a collaborative community. ] (]) 11:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
:*Disagree, to a trifling extent (''not'' about it being 'a repeated personal attack'; it was, and the block is sound). The FB claim can in no way be described as "'''totally'' false"- his interpretation may well be mistaken, but could be valid, according to the link. Likewise, disagreement on the interpretation of an opaque statement cannot call competence into question. None of which, of course, alters the original facts of the case one iota. ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 12:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
::It's still ] and ] bordering on ]; don't make accusations if you can't back them up, basically. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 17:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
*I'm tempted to extend the block to indefinite for incompetence, since Cebr1979 misread my ''critique'' of Flyer in that ANI thread as "worship the keyboard Flyer types on". ] (]) 13:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
::Perhaps that was just innocence rather than experience <small>(W/ apologies Blake!)</small> on that editor's part... ] <sup>''''']'''''</sup> 13:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
:::There is nothing innocent about Cebr1979's behavior. It's a long-term and consistent pattern of hostility in response to all criticism and suggestion, as demonstrated by the long block log for the same behaviors, repeated appearances at noticeboards for them and all the evidence presented therein. Indeed, the editor is essentially ] about being ], which is a rather poisonous combination. As I said at the last ANI, I sometimes actually agree with Cebr1979's view on something, but their approach to everything is pure vitriol. It's rather like being in a bar/pub discussion about whether Michael Jackson or the Beatles had more #1 albums. One may agree if Cebr1979 has the correct answer, but not with the suggestion to have a knife fight about it with the person who was wrong.<p>PS: It's a damned shame, because Cebr1979's cleanup work at fiction articles to comply with ] is usually correct and necessary. The issue, though, comes down to ]: It isn't necessary that Cebr1979 in particular be the one to do it, and the productivity of those edits is not an excuse for the anti-productivity of the strife the editor generates with their hostility. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 18:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)</p>


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cebr1979. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
== A few facts ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
In response to your last ANI comments:

* "As for an RfC (whatever that is)" – You've commented in many RfCs before , , , so you already know what they are.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
* "at Village Pump, I didn't even know Village Pump existed until last month" – More prevarication; you've been posting at VP since 2014, albeit not frequently .
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
* "somewhere you go for technical help hardly seems like the place to go to start a conversation about soap operas." – ] is the page for technical issues; the RfC was posted at ], the page for ] issues, including guidleines, including style guidelines.
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/44&oldid=750786920 -->
* "I've told you before: I have no interest in long, drawn out talks being on my personal talk page." – Too bad. Your behavior here requires frequent drawn out discussions, and your talk page is the place to have them. Because you make this effectively impossible through sheer obstinancy, they instead happen at ], and you thus get blocked. You would have far fewer blocks if you would use your talk page the way everyone else does and in the way it was intended. Judging from the above, your next block will be permanent (maybe even this one will).
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
* "I have no interest in getting an e-mails every time someone comments." – Then turn off the e-mail notifications; this is an option under "Preferences", top right.
{{Tmbox
<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] ≽<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>≼ </span> 17:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = ]
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing for ]{{#if:]|&#32;per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. '''] ]''' 05:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}

Latest revision as of 22:19, 16 February 2023

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Cebr1979, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.

ElectricBurst(Zaps) 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cebr1979. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Cebr1979. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
User talk:Cebr1979: Difference between revisions Add topic