Allan R. Bomhard: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:31, 18 September 2023 view sourceWarrenmck (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,138 edits rv major COI with uncited block of text. Undid revision 1175980310 by Arbomhard (talk)Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:35, 18 September 2023 view source Arbomhard (talk \| contribs)158 editsNo edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{Use American English\|date=July 2022}}		{{Use American English\|date=July 2022}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=July 2022}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=July 2022}}
			Allan R. Bomhard (born 1943 in Brooklyn, New York) is an American linguist.
	'''Allan R. Bomhard''' is an American ]. He is part of a small group of proponents of the ], according to which the ], ], ], and ] would all belong to a larger ].<ref name=nyt>{{cite news\|title=Linguists Debating Deepest Roots of Language\|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/27/science/linguists-debating-deepest-roots-of-language.html\|newspaper=]\|first=George\|last=Johnson\|date=June 27, 1995}}</ref> The theory is widely rejected by mainstream linguists.<ref name=nyt/><ref>{{cite book \|last1=Campbell \|first1=Lyle \|title=Historical Linguistics: An Introduction \|date=1998 \|publisher=The MIT Press \|isbn=978-0262518499 \|page=311\|quote="Postulated remote relationships such as Amerind, Nostratic and Proto-World have been featured in newspapers, magazines and television documentaries, and yet these same proposals have been rejected by most mainstream historical linguistics"}}</ref> Among Nostratists, he has been described as "a maximalist who casts his nets as widely as possible" among far-flung languages not generally believed to be related.<ref>{{cite magazine\|title=Was There an ancient superlanguage called Nostratic?\|magazine=]\|date=November 9, 2022\|author=]\|url=https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/history-ideas/2022/11/was-there-an-ancient-superlanguage-called-nostratic/}}</ref>
			He was educated at Fairleigh Dickinson University, Hunter College, and the City University of New York,and served in the U.S. Army from 1964—1966. He currently resides in Florence, SC. He has studied thecontroversial hypotheses about the underlying unity among the proposed Nostratic and Eurasiatic languagefamilies. He has published nearly 100 articles and 19 books on comparative-historical inguistics, aswell as a number of books/booklets on Buddhism.

	Russian linguists ], Mikhail Zhivlov, and Alexei Kassian have criticized his work as imprecise and "historically unrealistic".<ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Starostin \|first1=George \| author1-link = Georgiy Starostin \| last2 = Zhivlov \| first2 = Mikhail \| last3 = Kassian \| first3 = Alexei \|title=The "Nostratic" roots of Indo-European: from Illich-Svitych to Dolgopolsky to future horizons \|journal=Slovo a Slovesnost \| url = https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.730add89-51a2-446e-9330-c2d163e62180 \|date=2016 \| volume = 77 \| issue = 4 \|page=403}}</ref>

	==Books==		==Books==

Revision as of 19:35, 18 September 2023

American linguist (born 1943)

Allan R. Bomhard (born 1943 in Brooklyn, New York) is an American linguist. He was educated at Fairleigh Dickinson University, Hunter College, and the City University of New York,and served in the U.S. Army from 1964—1966. He currently resides in Florence, SC. He has studied thecontroversial hypotheses about the underlying unity among the proposed Nostratic and Eurasiatic languagefamilies. He has published nearly 100 articles and 19 books on comparative-historical inguistics, aswell as a number of books/booklets on Buddhism.

Books

Toward Proto-Nostratic: A New Approach to the Comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1984.
Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis. Charleston: SIGNUM Desktop Publishing, 1996.
Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 2 vols, 2008
The Nostratic Hypothesis in 2011: Trends and Issues. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man, 2011.
An Introductory Grammar of the Pali Language. Charleston: Charleston Buddhist Fellowship, 2012

with John C. Kerns:

The Nostratic Macrofamily: A Study in Distant Linguistic Relationship. Berlin, New York, NY, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994.

with Arnaud Fournet:

The Indo-European Elements in Hurrian. La Garenne Colombes / Charleston, 2010.

References

Reviews of Toward Proto-Nostratic:
- Kaye, Alan S. (1985). "Review". Language. 61 (4): 887–891. doi:10.2307/414496. ISSN 0097-8507. JSTOR 414496.
- Levin, Saul (January 1985). "Review". Diachronica. 2 (1): 97–104. doi:10.1075/dia.2.1.09lev.
- Helimski, Eugene (1987). "A "New Approach" to Nostratic Comparison". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 107 (1): 97–100. doi:10.2307/602956. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 602956.
- Palmaitis, Mykolas L. (December 1986). "Besprechungsaufsätze: New Contributions to "Proto-Nostratic"". Indogermanische Forschungen: 305–317. doi:10.1515/9783110243338.305.
Reviews of Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis:
- McCall, Daniel F. (1997). "Rev. of Bomhard, Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis". International Journal of African Historical Studies. 30 (2): 473–76. doi:10.2307/221291. JSTOR 221291.
- Sidwell, Paul J. (January 1998). "Review". Diachronica. 15 (2): 341–348. doi:10.1075/dia.15.2.09sid.
- Gluhak, Alemko (1997). "Allan R. Bomhard, Indo-European and the Nostratic hypothesis". Filologija (in Croatian). 29: 200–205.
- Matthews, S. (1998). "Review of Indo-European and the Nostratic hypothesis". Word: Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York. 49 (1): 113.
Greppin, John A.C. (2017). "Review of The Nostratic Hypothesis in 2011". Prace Językoznawcze. XIX (3): 235–250. ISSN 1509-5304.
Reviews of The Nostratic Macrofamily:
- Orel, Vladimir (1996). "Rev. of Bomhard and Kerns, The Nostratic Macrofamily". Anthropological Linguistics. 38 (1): 155–58. JSTOR 30028451.
- Campbell, Lyle (1996). "Review of The Nostratic Macrofamily: A Study in Distant Linguistic Relationship". Language. 72 (3): 656–657. doi:10.2307/416301. ISSN 0097-8507. JSTOR 416301.
- Picard, Marc (March 1996). "Review". Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 41 (1): 62–65. doi:10.1017/S0008413100020284. ISSN 0008-4131. S2CID 148709978.
Kassian, Alexei (2010). "Review of The Indo-European Elements in Hurrian" (PDF). Journal of Language Relationship. 4: 199–211.

v t e Long-range comparative linguistics
Concepts	Comparative method Etymological dictionary Glottochronology Lexicostatistics Linguistic reconstruction Internal reconstruction Linguistic universal Macrofamily Mass comparison Origin of language Paleolinguistics Proto-language Swadesh list Dolgopolsky list Leipzig–Jakarta list
Language families	Proto-human Borean Amerind Nostratic Elamo-Dravidian Eurasiatic Altaic Ural-Altaic Indo-Uralic Sino-Uralic Dené–Caucasian North Caucasian Austric Indo-Pacific
Linguists	John Bengtson Václav Blažek Allan R. Bomhard Svetlana Burlak Aharon Dolgopolsky Vladimir Dybo Harold C. Fleming Joseph Greenberg Eugene Helimski Murray Gell-Mann Vladislav Illich-Svitych Frederik Kortlandt Alexis Manaster Ramer Sergei Nikolaev Sorin Paliga Holger Pedersen Ilia Peiros Martine Robbeets Merritt Ruhlen Vitaly Shevoroshkin Georgiy Starostin Sergei Starostin Alfredo Trombetti
Journals	Journal of Language Relationship Mother Tongue
Books	Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages The Languages of Africa
Institutions and schools	Evolution of Human Languages Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow School of Comparative Linguistics Russian State University for the Humanities Santa Fe Institute
Linguistics portal Category

Categories:

Revision as of 19:31, 18 September 2023 view sourceWarrenmck (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,138 edits rv major COI with uncited block of text. Undid revision 1175980310 by Arbomhard (talk)Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:35, 18 September 2023 view source Arbomhard (talk \| contribs)158 editsNo edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{Use American English\|date=July 2022}}		{{Use American English\|date=July 2022}}
	{{Use mdy dates\|date=July 2022}}		{{Use mdy dates\|date=July 2022}}
			Allan R. Bomhard (born 1943 in Brooklyn, New York) is an American linguist.
	'''Allan R. Bomhard''' is an American ]. He is part of a small group of proponents of the ], according to which the ], ], ], and ] would all belong to a larger ].<ref name=nyt>{{cite news\|title=Linguists Debating Deepest Roots of Language\|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/27/science/linguists-debating-deepest-roots-of-language.html\|newspaper=]\|first=George\|last=Johnson\|date=June 27, 1995}}</ref> The theory is widely rejected by mainstream linguists.<ref name=nyt/><ref>{{cite book \|last1=Campbell \|first1=Lyle \|title=Historical Linguistics: An Introduction \|date=1998 \|publisher=The MIT Press \|isbn=978-0262518499 \|page=311\|quote="Postulated remote relationships such as Amerind, Nostratic and Proto-World have been featured in newspapers, magazines and television documentaries, and yet these same proposals have been rejected by most mainstream historical linguistics"}}</ref> Among Nostratists, he has been described as "a maximalist who casts his nets as widely as possible" among far-flung languages not generally believed to be related.<ref>{{cite magazine\|title=Was There an ancient superlanguage called Nostratic?\|magazine=]\|date=November 9, 2022\|author=]\|url=https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/history-ideas/2022/11/was-there-an-ancient-superlanguage-called-nostratic/}}</ref>
			He was educated at Fairleigh Dickinson University, Hunter College, and the City University of New York,and served in the U.S. Army from 1964—1966. He currently resides in Florence, SC. He has studied thecontroversial hypotheses about the underlying unity among the proposed Nostratic and Eurasiatic languagefamilies. He has published nearly 100 articles and 19 books on comparative-historical inguistics, aswell as a number of books/booklets on Buddhism.

	Russian linguists ], Mikhail Zhivlov, and Alexei Kassian have criticized his work as imprecise and "historically unrealistic".<ref>{{cite journal \|last1=Starostin \|first1=George \| author1-link = Georgiy Starostin \| last2 = Zhivlov \| first2 = Mikhail \| last3 = Kassian \| first3 = Alexei \|title=The "Nostratic" roots of Indo-European: from Illich-Svitych to Dolgopolsky to future horizons \|journal=Slovo a Slovesnost \| url = https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.730add89-51a2-446e-9330-c2d163e62180 \|date=2016 \| volume = 77 \| issue = 4 \|page=403}}</ref>

	==Books==		==Books==

Misplaced Pages