| Revision as of 02:37, 2 November 2023 editDan Leonard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers3,478 editsm →Miles Routledge: deletion review log link again← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:17, 2 November 2023 edit undoVaikunda Raja (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,866 edits →Annamalai KuppusamyTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | ||
| ====]==== | |||
| :{{DRV links|Annamalai Kuppusamy|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/K. Annamalai (I.P.S)|article=Foo}} | |||
| The article was created by somebody in 2020 and was proposed for deletion within weeks on the ground that the article fails the ] and ] criteria and was deleted after discussion. | |||
| It seems not very unfair to delete the page at that point since he was just another IPS officer leaving service and joining a political party. Though it is very much evident that, he is more notable and not like every other hundreds of IPS officers as he was different and was famous. He recieves unusual media coverage atleast locally. But that doesn’t qualify enough to pass the ] and ] criterias. Also the article presented then was more in a promotion tone. There was also a title conflict since there is another person with the name K.Annamalai. The nominator of the AFD himself “suggest to delete the article for now and wait till anything develops reason being[REDACTED] is not a soapbox and biographical host for every person” Consensus reached to delete the article ‘atleast temporarily’. | |||
| '''BUT''', things had changed substatially over time. He was appointed as the state vice-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party and was promoted as the State President a year later. | |||
| From day 1 in his office until now, he is been in the headlines of leading, reputed Tamil and English, newspapers and electronic media in Tamil Nadu 24x7x365. He even reaches national headlines frequently. It could be verified online here | |||
| , , and ]s already has artilce on him and the gets 5 to 7 times the views on an average when compared to the article on the previous president ], even though he is a union minister. | |||
| I am elobrating all these things just to reflect upon his increased notability over time. Now the ] criteria is met and he does not fit into the ] category. | |||
| Even though the name space Annamalai.K is been already created for a former ‘1-time-MLA’ who was elected in 2001 and was very little notable comparably. Yet he was argued to be an elected representative. Apart from that he was nowhere near to ‘Annamalai Kuppusamy’ (whom we are discussing about) in the notability scale. (This is another discussion) | |||
| For the argument that the tone of the then article is promotional, I have a different version which shall be uploaded (again it shall be discussed). | |||
| For the citations – There are already tens of hundreds of news articles available on him. We will be able to add fare references from reputed sources readily. | |||
| So it is very much unfair not to have a page in English Misplaced Pages on him now. - ]] 06:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| :{{DRV links|Miles Routledge|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2023_April_2#Miles_Routledge|article=}} | :{{DRV links|Miles Routledge|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2023_April_2#Miles_Routledge|article=}} | ||
Revision as of 06:17, 2 November 2023
< 2023 November 1 Deletion review archives: 2023 November 2023 November 3 >2 November 2023
Annamalai Kuppusamy
The article was created by somebody in 2020 and was proposed for deletion within weeks on the ground that the article fails the WP:NPOL and WP:BLP1E criteria and was deleted after discussion.
It seems not very unfair to delete the page at that point since he was just another IPS officer leaving service and joining a political party. Though it is very much evident that, he is more notable and not like every other hundreds of IPS officers as he was different and was famous. He recieves unusual media coverage atleast locally. But that doesn’t qualify enough to pass the WP:NPOL and WP:BLP1E criterias. Also the article presented then was more in a promotion tone. There was also a title conflict since there is another person with the name K.Annamalai. The nominator of the AFD himself “suggest to delete the article for now and wait till anything develops reason being[REDACTED] is not a soapbox and biographical host for every person” Consensus reached to delete the article ‘atleast temporarily’.
BUT, things had changed substatially over time. He was appointed as the state vice-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party and was promoted as the State President a year later. From day 1 in his office until now, he is been in the headlines of leading, reputed Tamil and English, newspapers and electronic media in Tamil Nadu 24x7x365. He even reaches national headlines frequently. It could be verified online here
Tamil, Malayalam,hindi and Kannada Wikipedias already has artilce on him and the traffic for the page in Tamil[REDACTED] gets 5 to 7 times the views on an average when compared to the article on the previous president L. Murugan, even though he is a union minister.
I am elobrating all these things just to reflect upon his increased notability over time. Now the WP:NPOL criteria is met and he does not fit into the WP:BLP1E category.
Even though the name space Annamalai.K is been already created for a former ‘1-time-MLA’ who was elected in 2001 and was very little notable comparably. Yet he was argued to be an elected representative. Apart from that he was nowhere near to ‘Annamalai Kuppusamy’ (whom we are discussing about) in the notability scale. (This is another discussion)
For the argument that the tone of the then article is promotional, I have a different version which shall be uploaded (again it shall be discussed).
For the citations – There are already tens of hundreds of news articles available on him. We will be able to add fare references from reputed sources readily.
So it is very much unfair not to have a page in English Misplaced Pages on him now. - Vaikunda Raja:talk: 06:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Miles Routledge
A previous deletion review recommended allowing recreation; however, I'm requesting restoration of the original article. There is a draft pending at Draft:Miles Routledge, and I'd like to have the original article back with its old edit history so that the draft at AfC can be combined into it. Dan Leonard (talk) 01:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)