Talk:Malacañang Palace: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:03, 18 March 2009 editRazzmatazz143 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,360 editsm added category← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:33, 14 February 2024 edit undoSanglahi86 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions52,500 edits Assessment: banner shell, Tambayan Philippines, +Historic sites (Low) (Rater)
(43 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{talkheader\|search=yes}}
	{{WPPhilippines\|class=Start\|importance=Top}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|1=
⚫	{{Architecture~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=~~Top~~}}
			{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines\|importance=High}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject Architecture\|importance=mid}}
			{{WikiProject Historic sites \|importance=Low}}
			}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav\|noredlinks=y}}
			\|maxarchivesize = 100K
			\|counter = 1
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 2
			\|minthreadsleft = 3
			\|algo = old(90d)
			\|archive = Talk:Malacañang Palace/Archive %(counter)d
			}}
			{{Old moves
			\| title1 = Malacañang Palace
			\| title2 = Malacañan Palace
			\| list =
			*RM, Malacañang Palace → Malacañan Palace, ''withdrawn'' = '''not moved''', 24 June 2016, ]
			}}

			== External links modified ==
	==Name==

	If it's "Malacañang Palace" is erroneous, why don't we move the article then to "Malacañan Palace"?
			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	:Because it is not erroneous. AFAIK, both Malacañang Palace and Malacañan Palace are correct. --] 08:01, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

	:According to this , the two are always interchangeable. --] 08:10, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
			I have just modified 4 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	::Not so long ago a signpost was erected along Osmeña Ave., and it displays "MALACAÑAN". Perhaps we should rename the article, or should the current title be retained?
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017222433/http://www.interaksyon.com/article/7701/aquino-moves-to-palace-study-as-bonifacio-hall-office-undergoes-repair to http://www.interaksyon.com/article/7701/aquino-moves-to-palace-study-as-bonifacio-hall-office-undergoes-repair
	:::Malacañang Palace is the most popular name so that should be the article name. --] \| ], 05:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001194700/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100606-274100/New-President-can-live-in-style-but-homey-House-of-Dreams to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100606-274100/New-President-can-live-in-style-but-homey-House-of-Dreams
	You still have the problem that officially, it is Malacañan Palace and Malacañang. So better to apply a consistent policy: are official residences referred to by their popular name and spelling, or according to the official terminology? ] 06:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001194738/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100730-283946/RPs-most-tightly-guarded-bachelors-pad-is-ready to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100730-283946/RPs-most-tightly-guarded-bachelors-pad-is-ready
	:Can you cite reliable sources regarding its official name? This is the only way to resolve the issue otherwise the popular name should be its title here in Misplaced Pages. --] 06:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703070543/http://picasaweb.google.com/mlquezon3/Malacanan to http://picasaweb.google.com/mlquezon3/Malacanan
	:: As said at ]:

	:::''Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.''
			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	:: IMHO, most English language speakers and even Pinoys easily recognize Malacanang, not Malacanan. --] \| ], 09:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

	That's clear then. Re: reliable source, there's the official stationery of the president, and the official history of the Palace which was published in 2005.] 10:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	:Just added some sourced material on the name.] (]) 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 21:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

			== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==
			The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
			* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion \| 2019-07-24T18:15:12.497679 \| Malacanang Palace old.jpg -->
			Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 18:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

			== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
			The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
			* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion \| 2020-09-24T16:29:01.378659 \| Malacañang Palace (Cropped).jpg -->
			Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 16:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:33, 14 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malacañang Palace article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Move logs: Malacañang Palace
Malacañan Palace

Discussions:

RM, Malacañang Palace → Malacañan Palace, withdrawn = not moved, 24 June 2016, discussion

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Malacañang Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Malacanang Palace old.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Malacañang Palace (Cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Categories: