Revision as of 00:48, 17 June 2021 editDreamy Jazz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators105,829 editsm →top: Community-authorised general sanctions have been replaced with standard discretionary sanctions, replaced: {{Gs/talk notice|covid}} → {{Ds/talk notice|covid}}Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:25, 9 March 2024 edit undoDreamy Jazz Bot (talk | contribs)Bots106,824 editsm Replacing Template:Ds/talk notice with Template:Contentious topics/talk notice. BRFA. | ||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} | {{talk header}} | ||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|covid}} | ||
{{split article|from=COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines|to=Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic|date=23 July 2020}} | {{split article|from=COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines|to=Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic|date=23 July 2020}} | ||
{{Annual readership}} | {{Annual readership}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= | ||
{{WikiProject COVID-19 |
{{WikiProject COVID-19|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Disaster management |
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Medicine |
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Low|pulmonology=yes}} | ||
{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines |
{{WikiProject Tambayan Philippines|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Viruses |
{{WikiProject Viruses|importance=Low}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:25, 9 March 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Material from COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines was split to Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic on 23 July 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of COVID-19 testing controversy in the Philippines into Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
This should be summarised at and merged with Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic since the controversy didn't age well: this happened for a very short time and the Philippines has managed to maximise its testing capability. The PhilHealth controversy is far more notable than this one. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 01:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging other editors who were involved in discussions related to this article: @Allenjambalaya, Hariboneagle927, Chieharumachi, Subwaymuncher, Ajf773, Quidquidlatetadparebit, and RioHondo:. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I second the motion to merge COVID-19 testing controversy in the Philippines to Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Allenjambalaya (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Merge as proposed.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep as a subpage of the proposed other page, because I feel the specific epidemiological response of the government matters in itself. I only agree with a merge if we have some assurance none of the details will be lost.-Chieharumachi (talk) 10:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Merge as proposed to also fill the missing details in the main article, such as the triage procedures and initial developments, etc. Currently, the main article only discusses swabbing centers and incomplete data in two very short paragraphs. There is more than enough room to accomodate the entire article in both the mass testing and controversies sections of the main article.--RioHondo (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Merge the testing controversy would fit under this page's section on controversies and criticisms. I will echo Chieharumachi's and RioHondo's points though, important details from the COVID-19 testing controversy in the Philippines page should be merged into the mass testing section. Quidquidlatetadparebit (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class COVID-19 articles
- Low-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- C-Class pulmonology articles
- Unknown-importance pulmonology articles
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class Philippine-related articles
- Mid-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles
- C-Class virus articles
- Low-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles