Revision as of 08:54, 25 May 2009 editListasBot (talk | contribs)482,720 edits Added listas to WPBiography (used DEFAULTSORT from article). Did I get it wrong?← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:30, 31 March 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,938,205 editsm Remove unknown param from WP Pakistan: Punjab; cleanupTag: AWB |
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=no|listas=Khan, Zafar Ali| |
|
{{WP Pakistan|H|class=Stub|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WP India|class=Stub|importance=|auto=yes|pre=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|History=yes|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography |
|
{{WPBiography |
|
|
|living=no |
|
|
|class=Stub |
|
⚫ |
|priority= |
|
|
|politician-work-group=yes |
|
|politician-work-group=yes |
|
⚫ |
|politician-priority=low |
|
|listas=Khan, Zafar Ali |
|
|
|auto=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Note Section issues == |
|
|
|
|
|
The last "Note" section of this article seems to be leaning towards a right wing biased view of history. It addresses the vigilante murderer with the titles of "Ghazi"(Conqueror) and "Shaheed"(Martyr), painting the act of Ilmuddin as a rightful crusade, in an attempt to prove Zafar Ali Khan's allyship of this at as heroic. I would propose that such wording for this section be removed and brought more in line with the already present Ilm-ud-din article on Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The last "Note" section of this article seems to be leaning towards a right wing biased view of history. It addresses the vigilante murderer with the titles of "Ghazi"(Conqueror) and "Shaheed"(Martyr), painting the act of Ilmuddin as a rightful crusade, in an attempt to prove Zafar Ali Khan's allyship of this at as heroic. I would propose that such wording for this section be removed and brought more in line with the already present Ilm-ud-din article on Misplaced Pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kashmarxi (talk • contribs) 20:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)