| Revision as of 09:46, 23 October 2023 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,588,513 editsm Substing templates: {{WikiProject Serial Killer task force}} per WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2023_October_4#Template:WikiProject_Serial_Killer_task_force. Report errors at User talk:AnomieBOT/TFDTemplateSubster.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:22, 23 June 2024 edit undoFloweringOctopus (talk | contribs)279 edits →I couldn't work out who said what...: new sectionTag: New topic |
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Karla Homolka/archive1 |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Karla Homolka/archive1 |
|
|currentstatus=FFAC}} |
|
|currentstatus=FFAC}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Homolka, Karla Leanne|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=C|listas=Homolka, Karla Leanne}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
{{WikiProject Canada|on=yes|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Canada|on=yes|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Criminal Biography|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=mid|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|class=C|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=high}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Women|class=C}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Image requested|people of Canada}} |
|
{{Image requested|people of Canada}} |
| Line 16: |
Line 15: |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Karla Homolka/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Karla Homolka/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== I couldn't work out who said what... == |
|
== Gender of Lynda Véronneau == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Psychiatric evaluation: |
|
This article leaves me confused as to Véronneau's gender at various points in the narrative. Véronneau is first described in this article as a "transgender man" and referred to with he/him pronouns. It is mentioned that Homolka did not consider the relationship homosexual because Véronneau identified as a man and planned to undergo sexual reassignment surgery. However, in a later paragraph their relationship is referred to as "lesbian" (in accordance with the source cited), and the sentence on Véronneau's book refers to "''her'' relationship with Homolka" (emphasis mine). Most news sources I can find refer to Véronneau as a woman and use she/her pronouns, with no mention of the transgender aspect. Did Véronneau revert to identifying as a woman at some point? If so, this should be clarified. --] (]) 17:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//Graham Glancy, a forensic psychiatrist hired by Bernardo's chief defence lawyer, John Rosen, had offered an alternative theory to explain Homolka's behaviour, noted Williams in Invisible Darkness, his first book on the case. "She appears to be a classic example of hybristophilia, an individual who is sexually aroused by a partner's violent sexual behaviour, Glancy suggested." |
|
{{BLP noticeboard}} |
|
|
|
Williams later reversed his opinion about her// |
|
|
|
|
|
The first sentence is hard to follow and could perhaps do with some brackets or something. But if Williams is quoted merely as the source for Glancy's opinion, then we have not been told Williams's opinion, as people often mention opinions they do not agree with in academic writing, meaning that we have been told that Williams reversed his opinion without having been told what that opinion was! |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, is the ''name ''of the defence lawyer necessary or helpful in that particular place, or does it just add to the difficulty of following the sentence? |
|
|
|
|
|
I was too confused to try to sort this out! ] (]) 11:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
//Graham Glancy, a forensic psychiatrist hired by Bernardo's chief defence lawyer, John Rosen, had offered an alternative theory to explain Homolka's behaviour, noted Williams in Invisible Darkness, his first book on the case. "She appears to be a classic example of hybristophilia, an individual who is sexually aroused by a partner's violent sexual behaviour, Glancy suggested."
Williams later reversed his opinion about her//
The first sentence is hard to follow and could perhaps do with some brackets or something. But if Williams is quoted merely as the source for Glancy's opinion, then we have not been told Williams's opinion, as people often mention opinions they do not agree with in academic writing, meaning that we have been told that Williams reversed his opinion without having been told what that opinion was!
