Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:48, 30 November 2011 editWill Beback (talk \| contribs)112,162 edits Rind et al. controversy & child sexual abuse ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:38, 24 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots8,044,265 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. (Category:WikiProject banners without banner shells)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(70 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|
			{{WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch}}
		⚫	}}
			{{Todo}}

	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}		\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
Line 7:		Line 12:
	\|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch/Archive %(counter)d		\|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch/Archive %(counter)d
	}}		}}

	{\| class="messagebox standard-talk"
	\|-
	\|]
	\| style="text-align: center" \|This miscellaneous page was nominated for ''''']''''' on 7 Feb 2006. The result of the discussion was '''No consensus to delete'''. An archived record of this discussion can be found ].
⚫	\|}
	<br>

	{{archive box\|auto=yes\|]}}		{{archive box\|auto=yes\|]}}
	__TOC__

	==Hallo, there's a page which could interest you==
	]: another debate about the page. Delete or not? ] (]) 00:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


			== Good article reassessment for ] ==
	==]==
			] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 19:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
	This article describes the controversy surrounding a scientific paper which appeared to legitimize or minimize the issue of ]. That controversy has carried over to Misplaced Pages and the article has been a stomping ground for PPA's in the past. I'm not sure how active this project is, but I'd encourage anyone seeing this to watchlist the article and to review recent edits. (I find scientific studies tedious to decipher, so I'm not much help.)   <b>]  ]  </b> 06:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:38, 24 October 2024

This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct)

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch

To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2019-02-26

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Restructure of WP:PAW for clarity and flow. In Progress SKay (talk) 12:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Maintain : Maintain Watchlist as necessary.
Verify : Verify Articles utilizing the PAW banner are appropriate. Talk pages that include the PAW Project banner may be viewed here.

Watchlist

View

Show Recent Changes

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Talk page archive of obsoleted subpage "Terminology" - circa 2006

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Good article reassessment for Jacobson v. United States

Jacobson v. United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:

Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists