Misplaced Pages

Devil's advocate: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:30, 7 April 2021 editBritmax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,628 edits See also: Tweak← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:08, 21 December 2024 edit undoClowddde (talk | contribs)24 edits better word, changed some time ago by an IP with a desire to dumb down articles 
(45 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Former official position within the Catholic Church}} {{Short description|Figure of speech and former official position within the Catholic Church}}
{{Other uses}} {{Other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2013}} {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2022}}
{{Catholic Church hierarchy sidebar}} {{Catholic Church hierarchy sidebar|expanded=Additional titles}}
{{canon law}} {{canon law}}
The '''''advocatus diaboli''''' (] for '''Devil's advocate''') is a former official position within the Catholic Church, the Promoter of the Faith: one who "argued against the ] (]hood) of a candidate in order to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization".<ref name="Helterbran2008">{{cite book|last=Helterbran|first=Valeri R.|title=Exploring Idioms|date=1 January 2008|publisher=Maupin House Publishing, Inc.|isbn=9781934338148|page=40|quote=''Devil's Advocate'' Definition: To take an opposing position for the sake of argument. Background: ''Devil's advocate'' is taken from a role formerly used in the canonization process in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1587, Pope Sixtus V established a process involving a canon attorney in the role of Promoter of the Faith or Devil's Advocate. This person argued against the canonization (sainthood) of a candidate in order to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization.}}<!--|access-date=29 August 2014--></ref> The '''{{lang|la|advocatus diaboli}}''' (] for '''Devil's advocate''') is a former official position within the Catholic Church, the Promoter of the Faith: one who "argued against the ] (]hood) of a candidate to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization".<ref name="Helterbran2008">{{cite book|last=Helterbran|first=Valeri R.|title=Exploring Idioms|date=1 January 2008|publisher=Maupin House Publishing, Inc.|isbn=9781934338148|page=40|quote=''Devil's Advocate'' Definition: To take an opposing position for the sake of argument. Background: ''Devil's advocate'' is taken from a role formerly used in the canonization process in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1587, Pope Sixtus V established a process involving a canon attorney in the role of Promoter of the Faith or Devil's Advocate. This person argued against the canonization (sainthood) of a candidate to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization.}}<!--|access-date=29 August 2014--></ref>


In common language, the phrase ''playing devil's advocate'' describes a situation where someone, given a certain ], takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), ] or to explore the thought further using a valid reasoning that both disagrees with the subject at hand and proves their own point valid. Despite being medieval in origin, this idiomatic expression is one of the most popular present-day English idioms used to express the concept of arguing against something without actually being committed to the contrary view.<ref>{{cite book|title=Devil's advocate meaning|url=http://www.theidioms.com/devils-advocate/}} The Idioms</ref> In common parlance, the phrase "'''playing devil's advocate'''" describes a situation where someone, given a certain ], takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), ] or to explore the thought further using valid reasoning that both disagrees with the subject at hand and proves their own point valid. Despite being medieval in origin, this idiomatic expression is one of the most popular present-day English idioms used to express the concept of arguing against something without actually being committed to the contrary view.<ref>{{cite book|title=Devil's advocate meaning|url=http://www.theidioms.com/devils-advocate/}} The Idioms</ref> Playing devil's advocate is considered a form of the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Piasecki |first=Otto |title=Otto Piasecki {{!}} Play the devil's advocate in the classroom |url=https://www.thedp.com/article/2019/10/devils-advocate-echochamber-ivy-league-upenn-philadelphia |access-date=2023-04-13 |website=www.thedp.com |language=en-us}}</ref>


==Origin and history== ==Origin and history==
During the ] process employed by the Roman ], the ''Promoter of the Faith'' (]: ''promotor fidei''), popularly known as the Devil's advocate (Latin: ''advocatus diaboli''), was a ] appointed by Church authorities to argue against the ] of a candidate.<ref name="Fanning">{{cite encyclopedia | title=Promotor Fidei | encyclopedia=Catholic Encyclopedia | publisher=Robert Appleton Company | author=Fanning, W. | year=1911 | volume=12 | location=New York | url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12454a.htm |oclc=811253232 |access-date=2018-01-19}}</ref> It was this person's job to take a ] view of the candidate's character, to look for holes in the evidence, to argue that any ]s attributed to the candidate were fraudulent, and so on. The Devil's advocate opposed ''God's advocate'' (Latin: ''advocatus Dei''; also known as the ''Promoter of the Cause''), whose task was to make the argument in favor of canonization. During the investigation of a cause, this task is now performed by the ''Promoter of Justice'' (''promotor iustitiae''), who is in charge of examining the accuracy of the inquiry on the saintliness of the candidate.<ref>{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Gray |first=Jason A. |title=The Evolution of the Promoter of the Faith in Causes of Beatification and Canonization of Saints: A study of the law of 1917 and 1983 |url=http://www.jgray.org/docs/Promotor_Fidei_lulu.pdf |website=jgray.org |access-date=2018-01-19}}{{Self-published source|date=January 2018|expert=y}}</ref> The Promoter of the Faith remains a figure in the Congregation of the Causes of Saints and is also known as the Prelate Theologian.<ref>{{cite web |last=John Paul II |title=Divinus Prefectionis Magister |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_divinus-perfectionis-magister.html |publisher=] |location=] |date=1983-01-25 |access-date=2018-01-19}}</ref> During the ] process employed by the ], the 'Promoter of the Faith' ({{langx|la|promotor fidei}}), popularly known as the Devil's advocate ({{lang|la|advocatus diaboli}}), was a ] appointed by Church authorities to argue against the canonization of a candidate.<ref name="Fanning">{{cite encyclopedia | title=Promotor Fidei | encyclopedia=Catholic Encyclopedia | publisher=Robert Appleton Company | author=Fanning, W. | year=1911 | volume=12 | location=New York | url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12454a.htm |oclc=811253232 |access-date=2018-01-19}}</ref> It was this person's job to take a skeptical view of the candidate's character, to look for holes in the evidence, to argue that any ]s attributed to the candidate were fraudulent, and so on. The Devil's advocate opposed 'God's advocate' ({{lang|la|advocatus Dei}}; also known as the 'Promoter of the Cause'), whose task was to make the argument in favor of canonization. During the investigation of a cause, this task is now performed by the 'Promoter of Justice' ({{lang|la|promotor iustitiae}}), who is in charge of examining the accuracy of the inquiry on the saintliness of the candidate.<ref>{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Gray |first=Jason A. |title=The Evolution of the Promoter of the Faith in Causes of Beatification and Canonization of Saints: A study of the law of 1917 and 1983 |url=http://www.jgray.org/docs/Promotor_Fidei_lulu.pdf |website=jgray.org |access-date=2018-01-19}}{{Self-published source|date=January 2018|expert=y}}</ref> The Promoter of the Faith remains a figure in the Congregation of the Causes of Saints and is also known as the Prelate Theologian.<ref>{{cite web |last=John Paul II |title=Divinus Prefectionis Magister |url=https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_divinus-perfectionis-magister.html |publisher=] |location=] |date=1983-01-25 |access-date=2018-01-19}}</ref>


The office was established in 1587 during the reign of ]. The first formal mention of such an officer is found in the canonization of St ] under ] (1513{{ndash}}1521).<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01168b.htm |last=Burtsell |first=Richard |title=Advocatus Diaboli |encyclopedia =The Catholic Encyclopedia |volume=1 |location=New York |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |year=1907 |access-date=2018-01-19 |oclc=875120339}}</ref> ] reduced the power and changed the role of the office in 1983. In cases of controversy the Vatican may still seek to solicit the testimony of critics of a candidate for canonization. One notable example of this was in 2003, when author ], an atheist and outspoken critic of ], was interviewed as part of her ] hearings.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-debate-over-sainthood/ | work=CBS News |first=Rebecca | last=Leung | title=The Debate Over Sainthood | date=19 October 2003 | access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2003/10/the-fanatic-fraudulent-mother-teresa.html | work=Slate |first=Christopher | last=Hitchens | title=Mommie Dearest: The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud. | date=20 October 2003 | access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref> The office was established in 1587 during the reign of ]. The first formal mention of such an officer is found in the canonization of St ] under ] (1513{{ndash}}1521).<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01168b.htm |last=Burtsell |first=Richard |title=Advocatus Diaboli |encyclopedia =The Catholic Encyclopedia |volume=1 |location=New York |publisher=Robert Appleton Company |year=1907 |access-date=2018-01-19 |oclc=875120339}}</ref> ] reduced the power and changed the role of the office in 1983. In cases of controversy, the Vatican may still seek to solicit the testimony of critics of a candidate for canonization. One notable example of this was in 2003, when author ], an atheist and outspoken critic of ], was interviewed as part of her ] hearings.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-debate-over-sainthood/ | publisher=CBS News |first=Rebecca | last=Leung | title=The Debate Over Sainthood | date=19 October 2003 | access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2003/10/the-fanatic-fraudulent-mother-teresa.html | work=Slate |first=Christopher | last=Hitchens | title=Mommie Dearest: The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud. | date=20 October 2003 | access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref>

==Effectiveness==

Psychologist {{ill|Charlan Jeanne Nemeth|wd=Q112533089|short=yes}} writes that inauthentic dissent (assigning someone to act as a Devil's advocate) is considerably less effective in improving ] than authentic dissent. She also writes that inauthentic dissent can cause people to become more entrenched in their original beliefs, the opposite of the intended purpose e.g. in businesses that use this technique.<ref>{{cite book |author=Charlan Jeanne Nemeth |title=In Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business |publisher=Basic Books |year=2018 |isbn=978-0465096299}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
*] *]
*] *{{transliteration|grc|]}}
*] *]
*] *]
Line 22: Line 26:
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*] *]


Line 36: Line 41:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Devil's Advocate}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Devil's Advocate}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 14:08, 21 December 2024

Figure of speech and former official position within the Catholic Church For other uses, see Devil's advocate (disambiguation).

Part of a series on the
Hierarchy of the
Catholic Church
Saint PeterSaint Peter
Ecclesiastical titles (order of precedence)
Liturgical titles
Administrative and pastoral titles
Consecrated and professed titles
Additional titles
Organization titles
Scale of justice
Part of a series on the
Canon law of the
Catholic Church
Ius vigens (current law)
Legal historyJus antiquum (c. 33-1140)

Jus novum (c. 1140-1563)

Jus novissimum (c. 1563-1918)

Jus codicis (1918-present)

Other

Eastern law
Liturgical lawLatin Church
Sacramental law

Sacraments

Sacramentals

Sacred places

Sacred times

Matrimonial law
Supreme authority, particular
churches
, and canonical structuresSupreme authority of the Church

Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures

Particular churches

Juridic persons

Jurisprudence

Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of Catholic canon law

Temporal goods (property)
Law of persons

Clerics

Office


Juridic and physical persons


Associations of the faithful


Consecrated life
Canonical documents
Penal law
Procedural lawPars statica (tribunals & ministers/parties)

Pars dynamica (trial procedure)

Canonization

Election of the Roman Pontiff

Legal practice and scholarship

Academic degrees

Journals and Professional Societies

Faculties of canon law

Canonists

Law of consecrated life

Institute of consecrated life

Society of apostolic life

icon Catholicism portal

The advocatus diaboli (Latin for Devil's advocate) is a former official position within the Catholic Church, the Promoter of the Faith: one who "argued against the canonization (sainthood) of a candidate to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization".

In common parlance, the phrase "playing devil's advocate" describes a situation where someone, given a certain point of view, takes a position they do not necessarily agree with (or simply an alternative position from the accepted norm), for the sake of debate or to explore the thought further using valid reasoning that both disagrees with the subject at hand and proves their own point valid. Despite being medieval in origin, this idiomatic expression is one of the most popular present-day English idioms used to express the concept of arguing against something without actually being committed to the contrary view. Playing devil's advocate is considered a form of the Socratic method.

Origin and history

During the canonization process employed by the Catholic Church, the 'Promoter of the Faith' (Latin: promotor fidei), popularly known as the Devil's advocate (advocatus diaboli), was a canon lawyer appointed by Church authorities to argue against the canonization of a candidate. It was this person's job to take a skeptical view of the candidate's character, to look for holes in the evidence, to argue that any miracles attributed to the candidate were fraudulent, and so on. The Devil's advocate opposed 'God's advocate' (advocatus Dei; also known as the 'Promoter of the Cause'), whose task was to make the argument in favor of canonization. During the investigation of a cause, this task is now performed by the 'Promoter of Justice' (promotor iustitiae), who is in charge of examining the accuracy of the inquiry on the saintliness of the candidate. The Promoter of the Faith remains a figure in the Congregation of the Causes of Saints and is also known as the Prelate Theologian.

The office was established in 1587 during the reign of Pope Sixtus V. The first formal mention of such an officer is found in the canonization of St Lawrence Justinian under Pope Leo X (1513–1521). Pope John Paul II reduced the power and changed the role of the office in 1983. In cases of controversy, the Vatican may still seek to solicit the testimony of critics of a candidate for canonization. One notable example of this was in 2003, when author Christopher Hitchens, an atheist and outspoken critic of Mother Teresa, was interviewed as part of her beatification hearings.

Effectiveness

Psychologist Charlan Jeanne Nemeth [d] writes that inauthentic dissent (assigning someone to act as a Devil's advocate) is considerably less effective in improving group decision-making than authentic dissent. She also writes that inauthentic dissent can cause people to become more entrenched in their original beliefs, the opposite of the intended purpose e.g. in businesses that use this technique.

See also

References

  1. Helterbran, Valeri R. (1 January 2008). Exploring Idioms. Maupin House Publishing, Inc. p. 40. ISBN 9781934338148. Devil's Advocate Definition: To take an opposing position for the sake of argument. Background: Devil's advocate is taken from a role formerly used in the canonization process in the Roman Catholic Church. In 1587, Pope Sixtus V established a process involving a canon attorney in the role of Promoter of the Faith or Devil's Advocate. This person argued against the canonization (sainthood) of a candidate to uncover any character flaws or misrepresentation of the evidence favoring canonization.
  2. Devil's advocate meaning. The Idioms
  3. Piasecki, Otto. "Otto Piasecki | Play the devil's advocate in the classroom". www.thedp.com. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  4. Fanning, W. (1911). "Promotor Fidei". Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 12. New York: Robert Appleton Company. OCLC 811253232. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  5. Gray, Jason A. The Evolution of the Promoter of the Faith in Causes of Beatification and Canonization of Saints: A study of the law of 1917 and 1983 (PDF). jgray.org (PhD). Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  6. John Paul II (25 January 1983). "Divinus Prefectionis Magister". Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  7. Burtsell, Richard (1907). "Advocatus Diaboli". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company. OCLC 875120339. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  8. Leung, Rebecca (19 October 2003). "The Debate Over Sainthood". CBS News. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  9. Hitchens, Christopher (20 October 2003). "Mommie Dearest: The pope beatifies Mother Teresa, a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud". Slate. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  10. Charlan Jeanne Nemeth (2018). In Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465096299.

External links

Categories:
Devil's advocate: Difference between revisions Add topic