Revision as of 11:30, 23 December 2023 editNeils51 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,010 editsm →Catholic Church in Germany: replaced: annonced → announcedTag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:28, 31 December 2024 edit undoJJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,758,299 editsm Merging Category:Same-sex marriage in Europe by country to Category:Same-sex marriage by country and Category:Same-sex marriage in Europe per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 December 22#Category:Same-sex marriage in Africa by country | ||
(36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|none}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} | ||
{{Same-sex unions}} | {{Same-sex unions|marriage}} | ||
] has been legal in ] since 1 October 2017. A bill for the legalisation of same-sex marriage passed the ] on 30 June 2017 and the ] on 7 July. It was signed into law on 20 July by ] ] and published in the '']'' on 28 July 2017. Previously, the governing ] had refused to legislate on the issue of same-sex marriage. In June 2017, Chancellor ] unexpectedly said she hoped the matter would be put to a ]. Consequently, other party leaders organised for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess. The Bundestag passed the legislation on 30 June by 393 votes to 226, and it went into force on 1 October. Germany was the first country in ] |
] has been legal in ] since 1 October 2017. A bill for the legalisation of same-sex marriage passed the ] on 30 June 2017 and the ] on 7 July. It was signed into law on 20 July by ] ] and published in the '']'' on 28 July 2017. Previously, the governing ] had refused to legislate on the issue of same-sex marriage. In June 2017, Chancellor ] unexpectedly said she hoped the matter would be put to a ]. Consequently, other party leaders organised for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess. The Bundestag passed the legislation on 30 June by 393 votes to 226, and it went into force on 1 October. Polling suggests that a significant majority of ] support the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.<ref name="pew"/><ref name="euro"/> Germany was the first country in ], the fourteenth in ], and the ] to allow same-sex couples to marry nationwide. | ||
From 2001 until 2017, Germany recognized ]s for same-sex couples. The benefits granted by these partnerships were gradually extended by the ] throughout several rulings until they provided for most, but not all, of the rights of ]. | |||
==Registered life partnerships== | ==Registered life partnerships== | ||
===First and second Schröder governments=== | ===First and second Schröder governments=== | ||
The ''Act on Registered Life Partnerships'' ({{ |
The ''Act on Registered Life Partnerships'' ({{langx|de|Gesetz über die Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft}}) was a compromise between proponents of ] and conservatives from the two major conservative parties, whose MPs' interpretation of ] excluded gay people. The act established ] ({{langx|de|eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft}}, {{IPA|de|ˈaɪ̯nɡəˌtʁaːɡənə ˈleːbm̩sˌpaʁtnɐʃaft|pron}}){{efn|In Germany's ]:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://integreat.app/bochum/rom/mi%C5%9Bto-avil%C4%83n/importantno-ofisura/ofiso-e-registraciako|language=rom|work=Stadt Bochum|access-date=25 November 2024|title=Ofiso e registraciako}}</ref> | ||
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} | {{div col|colwidth=30em}} | ||
*{{ |
*{{langx|bar|Lemspartnaschoft}}, {{IPA|bar|ˈleːmsˌb̥ɑːd̥nɐʃɔfd̥|pron}} | ||
*{{ |
*{{langx|nds|Levenspartnerschop}},<ref>{{cite web|url=https://netz.sass-platt.de/platt-hoch/?term=Levenspartnerschop|title=SASS Plattdeutsches Netzwörterbuch: Levenspartnerschop|access-date=3 June 2024|work=netz.sass-platt.de}}</ref> {{IPA|nds|ˈlɛːm̩sˌpaɐ̯tnɐʃop|pron}} | ||
*{{langx|da|registreret partnerskab}},<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fla.de/wp/dailys/det-foerste-homoseksuelle-par-har-giftet-sig-tyskland/|title=Det første homoseksuelle par har giftet sig i Tyskland|work=]|date=1 October 2017|language=da|last=Kirkeby|first=Bianca|access-date=27 October 2019|archive-date=27 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191027143611/https://www.fla.de/wp/dailys/det-foerste-homoseksuelle-par-har-giftet-sig-tyskland/|url-status=dead}}</ref> {{IPA|da|ʁekiˈstʁeˀð̩ ˈpʰɑːtnɐˌskɛˀp|pron}} | |||
*{{ |
*{{langx|hsb|žiwjenske partnerstwo}},<ref>{{cite web|url=https://piwarc.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/jenoz-0-9-procentow-spodziwne-prispomnjenje-k-spechowanju-serbow-w-sakskej/|title=Jenož 0.9 procentow? Spodźiwne přispomnjenje k spěchowanju Serbow w Sakskej|work=piwarc.wordpress.com|date=16 March 2013|language=hsb}}</ref> {{IPA|hsb|ˈʒiwʲɛnskɛ ˈpaʁtnɛʁstwɔ|pron}} | ||
*{{ |
*{{langx|dsb|žywjeńske partnaŕstwo}},<ref>{{cite web|url=https://manualzz.com/doc/4721916/terminlogija-w%C4%9Bcneje-w%C4%9Bdy-terminologie-f%C3%BCr-den|title=Terminologija Wěcneje wědy|work=manualzz.com|date=2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190127205735/https://manualzz.com/doc/4721916/terminlogija-w%C4%9Bcneje-w%C4%9Bdy-terminologie-f%C3%BCr-den|archive-date=27 January 2019}}</ref> {{IPA|dsb|ˈʒɨvʲɛnʲskʲɛ ˈpartnarʲstwɔ|pron}} | ||
*]: {{lang|frr|laawenspårtnerschap |
*]: {{lang|frr|laawenspårtnerschap}} | ||
*{{ |
*{{langx|stq|Líeuwends-Partnerskup}}, {{IPA|stq|ˈliːu̯.ənts ˈpaɐ̯tnɐskʊp|pron}} | ||
*{{langx|rom|civilno partneripe|label=]}} | |||
*{{lang-rom|registralime partnerimo}} | |||
{{div col end}}}} granting same-sex couples a number of rights enjoyed by married opposite-sex couples. It was drafted by ] of the ] and was approved under the ], a coalition government constiting of the Greens and the ] (SPD). The ] approved it in November 2000 with the government parties voting in favour and the opposition ] and the ] (FDP) voting against. President ] signed the law on 16 February 2001 and it entered into force on 1 August 2001. | {{div col end}}}} granting same-sex couples a number of rights enjoyed by married opposite-sex couples. It was drafted by ] of the ] and was approved under the ], a coalition government constiting of the Greens and the ] (SPD). The ] approved it in November 2000 with the government parties voting in favour and the opposition ] and the ] (FDP) voting against. President ] signed the law on 16 February 2001 and it entered into force on 1 August 2001. | ||
On 17 July 2002, the ] upheld the act as constitutional.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/ls20020717_1bvf000101.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015017/http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/ls20020717_1bvf000101.html|url-status=dead|title=Leitsätze zum Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 17. Juli 2002|archive-date=28 September 2007}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=176|title=Lifetime Partnership Act of Germany}}</ref> The court found, unanimously, that the process leading to the law's enactment was constitutional. The 8-member court further ruled, with three dissenting votes, that the substance of the law conforms to the ] ( |
On 17 July 2002, the ] upheld the act as constitutional.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/ls20020717_1bvf000101.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015017/http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/ls20020717_1bvf000101.html|url-status=dead|title=Leitsätze zum Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 17. Juli 2002|archive-date=28 September 2007}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=176|title=Lifetime Partnership Act of Germany|access-date=27 June 2006|archive-date=15 March 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060315170326/http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=176|url-status=dead}}</ref> The court found, unanimously, that the process leading to the law's enactment was constitutional. The 8-member court further ruled, with three dissenting votes, that the substance of the law conforms to the ] ({{lang|de|Grundgesetz}}, the German Constitution), and ruled that these partnerships could be granted equal rights to those given to married couples. The initial law had deliberately withheld certain privileges, such as joint adoption and pension rights for widows and widowers, in an effort to observe the "special protection" which the Constitution provides for marriage and the family. The court determined that the "specialness" of the protection was not in the quantity of protection, but in the obligatory nature of this protection, whereas the protection of registered partnerships was at the Bundestag's discretion. | ||
On 12 October 2004, the ''Registered Life Partnership Law (Revision) Act'' ({{ |
On 12 October 2004, the ''Registered Life Partnership Law (Revision) Act'' ({{langx|de|Gesetz zur Überarbeitung des Lebenspartnerschaftsrechts}}) was passed by the Bundestag, increasing the rights of registered life partners to include, among others, the possibility of ] and simpler ] and ] rules, but excluding the same tax benefits as in a marriage. The law took effect on 1 January 2005.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.buzer.de/gesetz/7390/index.htm|title=LPartRÜG Gesetz zur Überarbeitung des Lebenspartnerschaftsrechts|website=www.buzer.de}}</ref> | ||
===First Merkel Government=== | ===First Merkel Government=== | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
===Second Merkel Government=== | ===Second Merkel Government=== | ||
On 25 October 2009, the new ] released its government programme. It stipulated that the tax inequality between same-sex life partners and opposite-sex married couples would be repealed and the Constitutional Court's ruling of 22 October would be codified into law.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.csu.de/common/_migrated/csucontent/091026_koalitionsvertrag_02.pdf|title= |
On 25 October 2009, the new ] released its government programme. It stipulated that the tax inequality between same-sex life partners and opposite-sex married couples would be repealed and the Constitutional Court's ruling of 22 October would be codified into law.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.csu.de/common/_migrated/csucontent/091026_koalitionsvertrag_02.pdf|title=Wachstum Bildung Zusammenhalt|language=de|work=CDU|access-date=3 June 2024}}</ref> However, the government programme did not mention ] rights.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://lsvd.de/1242.0.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091028021428/http://www.lsvd.de/1242.0.html|url-status=dead|title=Die FDP hat ihre Wahlversprechungen gehalten!|archive-date=28 October 2009}}</ref> | ||
On 17 August 2010, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that surviving registered partners are entitled to the same ] tax rules as surviving spouses. Previously, surviving marital partners paid 7–30% inheritance tax while surviving registered partners paid 17–50%.<ref>{{cite news|title=German court: gay couples entitled to equal treatment on inheritance tax|newspaper=The Canadian Press|agency=Associated Press|date=2010-08-17|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i47qav85cAhzZA0CT7xm8qBmWlgg|access-date=2010-08-17}}</ref> | On 17 August 2010, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that surviving registered partners are entitled to the same ] tax rules as surviving spouses. Previously, surviving marital partners paid 7–30% inheritance tax while surviving registered partners paid 17–50%.<ref>{{cite news|title=German court: gay couples entitled to equal treatment on inheritance tax|newspaper=The Canadian Press|agency=Associated Press|date=2010-08-17|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i47qav85cAhzZA0CT7xm8qBmWlgg|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100820104525/http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i47qav85cAhzZA0CT7xm8qBmWlgg|url-status=dead|archive-date=20 August 2010|access-date=2010-08-17}}</ref> | ||
On 18 February 2013, the Constitutional Court broadened adoption rights for registered partners.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-court-strengthens-gay-and-lesbian-adoption-rights-a-884278.html|title=Court Ruling: Germany Strengthens Gay Adoption Rights|publisher=Spiegel|date=2013-02-19}}</ref> The court ruled that a partner must be allowed to adopt the other partner's adopted child, a so-called "successive adoption", and not only a partner's biological child. However, the government did not bring up a vote in Parliament to change the adoption laws before it adjourned in June 2013. The court gave the Bundestag until 30 June 2014 to change the laws.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2013/02/ls20130219_1bvl000111.html|title=Bundesverfassungsgericht - Entscheidungen - Nichtzulassung der Sukzessivadoption durch eingetragene Lebenspartner ist verfassungswidrig|date=19 February 2013|website=www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de}}</ref> On 6 June 2013, the Constitutional Court ruled that registered partners should have joint tax filing benefits equal to those of married opposite-sex couples. The Bundestag had to change the law retroactively.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-high-court-supports-equal-tax-privileges-for-gay-couples-a-904111.html|title=High Court Ruling: Germany Grants Tax Equality to Gay Couples|publisher=Spiegel|date=2013-06-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=19573|title=Bundesrat beschließt Ehegattensplitting für Homo-Paare|date=5 July 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref> | On 18 February 2013, the Constitutional Court broadened adoption rights for registered partners.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-court-strengthens-gay-and-lesbian-adoption-rights-a-884278.html|title=Court Ruling: Germany Strengthens Gay Adoption Rights|publisher=Spiegel|date=2013-02-19}}</ref> The court ruled that a partner must be allowed to adopt the other partner's adopted child, a so-called "successive adoption", and not only a partner's biological child. However, the government did not bring up a vote in Parliament to change the adoption laws before it adjourned in June 2013. The court gave the Bundestag until 30 June 2014 to change the laws.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2013/02/ls20130219_1bvl000111.html|title=Bundesverfassungsgericht - Entscheidungen - Nichtzulassung der Sukzessivadoption durch eingetragene Lebenspartner ist verfassungswidrig|date=19 February 2013|website=www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de}}</ref> On 6 June 2013, the Constitutional Court ruled that registered partners should have joint tax filing benefits equal to those of married opposite-sex couples. The Bundestag had to change the law retroactively.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-high-court-supports-equal-tax-privileges-for-gay-couples-a-904111.html|title=High Court Ruling: Germany Grants Tax Equality to Gay Couples|publisher=Spiegel|date=2013-06-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=19573|title=Bundesrat beschließt Ehegattensplitting für Homo-Paare|date=5 July 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref> | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
The registered partnership law went into effect on 1 August 2001. By October 2004, 5,000 same-sex couples had registered.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html |title=Civil partnership |access-date=17 August 2017 |archive-date=16 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161016184449/http://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> | The registered partnership law went into effect on 1 August 2001. By October 2004, 5,000 same-sex couples had registered.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html |title=Civil partnership |access-date=17 August 2017 |archive-date=16 October 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161016184449/http://www.taeterinnen.org/en/04_civilpartnership.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
In 2007, there were 15,000 registered couples, two-thirds being male,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2008/PD08__037__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718225504/http://destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2008/PD08__037__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|url-status=dead|title=68 000 gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften in Deutschland|archive-date=18 July 2011}}</ref> and in 2010 there were 23,000 couples.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2011/PD11__025__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|title=Deutschlandweit rund 23 000 eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/gender/homosexualitaet/38844/lebensgemeinschaften|title=Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften | bpb|first=Bundeszentrale für politische|last=Bildung|website=bpb.de}}</ref> In May 2011, 68,268 people reported being in a registered life partnership.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.zensus2011.de/SharedDocs/AktuellesEN/Press_release_of_the_federal_statistical_office_2014_04.html?nn=3068736|title=ZENSUS2011 - Homepage - 2011 Census: just under a quarter of foreigners originate from Turkey|website=www.zensus2011.de|access-date=16 September 2014|archive-date=22 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180822214043/https://www.zensus2011.de/SharedDocs/AktuellesEN/Press_release_of_the_federal_statistical_office_2014_04.html?nn=3068736|url-status=dead}}</ref> As of the end of 2016, 44,000 registered partnerships had been conducted in Germany; approximately 25,000 (56.8%) were between men, while 19,000 were between women (43.2%).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/HaushalteFamilien/Tabellen/3_4_Gleichgeschlechtliche_Lebensgemeinschaften.html|title=Destatis: ''Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften – Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus und des Zensus''}}</ref> | In 2007, there were 15,000 registered couples, two-thirds being male,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2008/PD08__037__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718225504/http://destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2008/PD08__037__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|url-status=dead|title=68 000 gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften in Deutschland|archive-date=18 July 2011}}</ref> and in 2010 there were 23,000 couples.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/zdw/2011/PD11__025__p002,templateId=renderPrint.psml|title=Deutschlandweit rund 23 000 eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/gender/homosexualitaet/38844/lebensgemeinschaften|title=Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften | bpb|first=Bundeszentrale für politische|last=Bildung|website=bpb.de|date=20 November 2010 }}</ref> In May 2011, 68,268 people reported being in a registered life partnership.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.zensus2011.de/SharedDocs/AktuellesEN/Press_release_of_the_federal_statistical_office_2014_04.html?nn=3068736|title=ZENSUS2011 - Homepage - 2011 Census: just under a quarter of foreigners originate from Turkey|website=www.zensus2011.de|access-date=16 September 2014|archive-date=22 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180822214043/https://www.zensus2011.de/SharedDocs/AktuellesEN/Press_release_of_the_federal_statistical_office_2014_04.html?nn=3068736|url-status=dead}}</ref> As of the end of 2016, 44,000 registered partnerships had been conducted in Germany; approximately 25,000 (56.8%) were between men, while 19,000 were between women (43.2%).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/HaushalteFamilien/Tabellen/3_4_Gleichgeschlechtliche_Lebensgemeinschaften.html|title=Destatis: ''Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften – Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus und des Zensus''}}</ref> | ||
==Same-sex marriage== | ==Same-sex marriage== | ||
{{Same-sex marriage map Europe|align=right}} | {{Same-sex marriage map Europe|align=right}} | ||
], the senior member parties of Germany's coalition governments between 2005 and 2021, were historically opposed to the legalisation of ]. The ], the ] (SPD) and the ] support same-sex marriage and voted in June 2012 for a defeated bill to legalise it.<ref name="dis21">{{Cite web|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/135/1613596.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.linksfraktion.de/reden/oeffnung-ehe-lesben-schwule/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111020181442/http://linksfraktion.de/reden/oeffnung-ehe-lesben-schwule/|url-status=dead|title=Öffnung der Ehe für Lesben und Schwule|archive-date=20 October 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=16809 |title= Bundestag stimmt für Beibehaltung der Diskriminierung |publisher= Queer.de |date=28 June 2012 |access-date=12 September 2012|language=de}}</ref> The ] (FDP) supports same-sex marriage, though it rejected legislation when they were part of a ] with the CDU/CSU between 2009 and 2013. The SPD agreed to oppose same-sex marriage when in government with the CDU/CSU between 2013 and 2017. Most parties made agreement on same-sex marriage a condition for joining a coalition government with the CDU/CSU after the ].<ref name=BBCJune2017>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40416126|title=Germany: Merkel paves way for gay marriage vote|work=BBC News|date=27 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170627220908/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40416126|archive-date=27 June 2017}}</ref> Since legalization in October 2017, the CDU/CSU has opposed motions to repeal the same-sex marriage law, and mostly considers the matter "settled".<ref name=":2"/> In 2020, the ] (CDU) published a political video supporting same-sex marriage and families,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jetzt.de/lgbtq/75-jahre-cdu-cdu-entdeckt-die-ehe-fuer-alle-fuer-sich|work=Süddeutsche Zeitung Jetzt|title=75 Jahre CDU: CDU entdeckt die Ehe für alle für sich|language=de|date=27 June 2020}}</ref> and in 2023 the ] (CSU) adopted a party platform supporting same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/bayern/csu-grundsatzprogramm-ehe-fuer-alle-aber-keine-gender-sternchen-so-will-die-csu-bayern-vereinen-id66161906.html|work=Augsburger Allgemeine|title=Ehe für alle, aber keine Gender-Sternchen: So will die CSU Bayern vereinen|language=de|date=14 April 2023|last=Stern|first=Henry}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mainpost.de/ueberregional/bayern/nein-zum-gendersternchen-akzeptanz-der-ehe-fuer-alle-schweinfurterin-hat-grossen-anteil-am-neuen-csu-grundsatzprogramm-art-11103031|title=Nein zum Gendersternchen, Akzeptanz der "Ehe für alle": Schweinfurterin hat großen Anteil am neuen CSU-Grundsatzprogramm|date=14 April 2023|language=de|last=Stern|first=Henry|work=Main Post}}</ref> As of 2023, the ] remains the largest party opposed to same-sex marriage. | ], the senior member parties of Germany's coalition governments between 2005 and 2021, were historically opposed to the legalisation of ]. The ], the ] (SPD) and the ] support same-sex marriage and voted in June 2012 for a defeated bill to legalise it.<ref name="dis21">{{Cite web|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/135/1613596.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.linksfraktion.de/reden/oeffnung-ehe-lesben-schwule/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111020181442/http://linksfraktion.de/reden/oeffnung-ehe-lesben-schwule/|url-status=dead|title=Öffnung der Ehe für Lesben und Schwule|archive-date=20 October 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=16809 |title= Bundestag stimmt für Beibehaltung der Diskriminierung |publisher= Queer.de |date=28 June 2012 |access-date=12 September 2012|language=de}}</ref> The ] (FDP) supports same-sex marriage, though it rejected legislation when they were part of a ] with the CDU/CSU between 2009 and 2013. The SPD agreed to oppose same-sex marriage when in government with the CDU/CSU between 2013 and 2017. Most parties made agreement on same-sex marriage a condition for joining a coalition government with the CDU/CSU after the ].<ref name=BBCJune2017>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40416126|title=Germany: Merkel paves way for gay marriage vote|work=BBC News|date=27 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170627220908/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40416126|archive-date=27 June 2017}}</ref> Since legalization in October 2017, the CDU/CSU has opposed motions to repeal the same-sex marriage law, and mostly considers the matter "settled".<ref name=":2"/> In 2020, the ] (CDU) published a political video supporting same-sex marriage and families,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jetzt.de/lgbtq/75-jahre-cdu-cdu-entdeckt-die-ehe-fuer-alle-fuer-sich|work=Süddeutsche Zeitung Jetzt|title=75 Jahre CDU: CDU entdeckt die Ehe für alle für sich|language=de|date=27 June 2020}}</ref> and in 2023 the ] (CSU) adopted a party platform supporting same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/bayern/csu-grundsatzprogramm-ehe-fuer-alle-aber-keine-gender-sternchen-so-will-die-csu-bayern-vereinen-id66161906.html|work=Augsburger Allgemeine|title=Ehe für alle, aber keine Gender-Sternchen: So will die CSU Bayern vereinen|language=de|date=14 April 2023|last=Stern|first=Henry}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mainpost.de/ueberregional/bayern/nein-zum-gendersternchen-akzeptanz-der-ehe-fuer-alle-schweinfurterin-hat-grossen-anteil-am-neuen-csu-grundsatzprogramm-art-11103031|title=Nein zum Gendersternchen, Akzeptanz der "Ehe für alle": Schweinfurterin hat großen Anteil am neuen CSU-Grundsatzprogramm|date=14 April 2023|language=de|last=Stern|first=Henry|work=Main Post}}</ref> As of 2023, the ] (AfD) remains the largest party opposed to same-sex marriage. | ||
In ], same-sex marriage is known as |
In ], same-sex marriage is known as {{lang|es|gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe}} ({{IPA|de|ˈɡlaɪ̯çɡəˌʃlɛçtlɪçə ˈeːə|pron}}) or more commonly in public discourse as {{lang|es|Ehe für alle}} ({{IPA|de|ˈeːə fyːɐ̯ ˈʔalə|pron}}), meaning "marriage for all". | ||
===Second Merkel Government=== | ===Second Merkel Government=== | ||
Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
===Third Merkel Government=== | ===Third Merkel Government=== | ||
====Developments in 2013–2017==== | |||
] were held on 22 September 2013, after which a new government coalition was formed. The new Bundestag, inaugurated on 22 October, again consisted of a theoretical majority of parties in favour of same-sex marriage (SPD, The Left and the Greens). The Left immediately introduced a bill to legalise same-sex marriage, but the SPD did not support it in order to not jeopardise negotiations on government formation.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20212|title=Bundestag: Linke beantragt Ehe-Öffnung|date=9 October 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20308|title=Linksfraktion bringt Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe-Öffnung ein|date=25 October 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref> Even though the SPD had campaigned on "100% equality" for LGBT people, the coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and the SPD did not contain any significant change regarding LGBT rights.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20522|title=Große Koalition vertagt die Gleichstellung|publisher=Queer.de|date=27 November 2013|language=de}}</ref> The Left's bill had its ] on 19 December 2013 and was subsequently sent to the Legal Affairs Committee for consideration.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/561/56132.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> | ] were held on 22 September 2013, after which a new government coalition was formed. The new Bundestag, inaugurated on 22 October, again consisted of a theoretical majority of parties in favour of same-sex marriage (SPD, The Left and the Greens). The Left immediately introduced a bill to legalise same-sex marriage, but the SPD did not support it in order to not jeopardise negotiations on government formation.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20212|title=Bundestag: Linke beantragt Ehe-Öffnung|date=9 October 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20308|title=Linksfraktion bringt Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe-Öffnung ein|date=25 October 2013|publisher=Queer.de|language=de}}</ref> Even though the SPD had campaigned on "100% equality" for LGBT people, the coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and the SPD did not contain any significant change regarding LGBT rights.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=20522|title=Große Koalition vertagt die Gleichstellung|publisher=Queer.de|date=27 November 2013|language=de}}</ref> The Left's bill had its ] on 19 December 2013 and was subsequently sent to the Legal Affairs Committee for consideration.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/561/56132.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> | ||
On 5 June 2015, nine states (], Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Schleswig-Holstein and ]) submitted a same-sex marriage bill to the Bundesrat.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/672/67236.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> The legislation had its first reading on 12 June 2015. In the Bundestag, the Greens submitted another bill on 10 June 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/673/67360.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> It had its first reading on 18 June.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/050/1805098.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Abschaffung des Eheverbots für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare |publisher=Bundestag|language=de|access-date=29 January 2015}}</ref> On 25 September 2015, the Bundesrat voted to approve the bill proposed by the nine states.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/beratungsvorgaenge/2015/0201-0300/0273-15.html|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|website=Bundesrat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=24674|title=Bundesrat stimmt für Öffnung der Ehe für Schwule und Lesben|publisher=Queer.de|date=25 September 2015|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/09/26/germanys-bundesrat-passes-equal-marriage-bill-despite-merkels-opposition/|title=Germany's Bundesrat passes equal marriage bill despite Merkel's opposition|date=26 September 2016|work=Pink News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150929140121/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/09/26/germanys-bundesrat-passes-equal-marriage-bill-despite-merkels-opposition/|archive-date=29 September 2015}}</ref> The bill moved to the Bundestag where the governing parties (CDU/CSU and SPD) blocked the consideration of all three pending same-sex marriage bills.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=25261|title=Ehe für alle: Koalition blockiert Abstimmung im Bundestag|publisher=Queer.de|date=19 December 2015}}</ref> | On 5 June 2015, nine states (], Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Schleswig-Holstein and ]) submitted a same-sex marriage bill to the Bundesrat.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/672/67236.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> The legislation had its first reading on 12 June 2015. In the Bundestag, the Greens submitted another bill on 10 June 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP18/673/67360.html|title=DIP21 Extrakt|website=dipbt.bundestag.de}}</ref> It had its first reading on 18 June.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/050/1805098.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Abschaffung des Eheverbots für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare |publisher=Bundestag|language=de|access-date=29 January 2015}}</ref> On 25 September 2015, the Bundesrat voted to approve the bill proposed by the nine states.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bundesrat.de/SharedDocs/beratungsvorgaenge/2015/0201-0300/0273-15.html|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|website=Bundesrat}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=24674|title=Bundesrat stimmt für Öffnung der Ehe für Schwule und Lesben|publisher=Queer.de|date=25 September 2015|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/09/26/germanys-bundesrat-passes-equal-marriage-bill-despite-merkels-opposition/|title=Germany's Bundesrat passes equal marriage bill despite Merkel's opposition|date=26 September 2016|work=Pink News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150929140121/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/09/26/germanys-bundesrat-passes-equal-marriage-bill-despite-merkels-opposition/|archive-date=29 September 2015}}</ref> The bill moved to the Bundestag where the governing parties (CDU/CSU and SPD) blocked the consideration of all three pending same-sex marriage bills.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=25261|title=Ehe für alle: Koalition blockiert Abstimmung im Bundestag|publisher=Queer.de|date=19 December 2015}}</ref> | ||
In March 2017, the SPD, the junior partner in the coalition government, announced they would press the CDU to legalise same-sex marriage in the face of overwhelming public support.<ref>{{cite news|title=Merkel's conservatives under pressure to allow gay marriage|work=dw.com|first=Carla|last=Bleiker|date=6 March 2017|access-date=8 March 2017|url=http://www.dw.com/en/merkels-conservatives-under-pressure-to-allow-gay-marriage/a-37830880}}</ref> The leader of the SPD in the Bundestag, ], said his party would introduce a bill, in addition to the long-pending bills of the Greens, The Left and the one referred from the Bundesrat,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=28395|title=Oppermann: SPD-Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe für alle noch im März|date=11 March 2017|publisher=Queer.de}}</ref> but eventually did not do so. On 20 June 2017, the ] rejected an application by the Greens for an injunction ordering the Legal Affairs Committee to send bills legalising same-sex marriage to lawmakers for a vote in Parliament's last ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/german-opposition-party-fails-force-gay-marriage-vote-n774656|title=German Opposition Party Fails to Force Gay Marriage Vote|agency=Associated Press|publisher=NBC News|date=20 June 2017}}</ref> On 17 June 2017, the Greens pledged not to participate in any governing coalition after the 2017 elections unless the legalisation of same-sex marriage was part of the agreement.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/german-greens-make-same-sex-marriage-guarantee-condition-of-coalition/a-39294421|title=German Greens make same-sex marriage guarantee condition of coalition|work=]|date=17 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625212929/http://www.dw.com/en/german-greens-make-same-sex-marriage-guarantee-condition-of-coalition/a-39294421|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-greens-idUSKBN1980T7|title=Germany's Greens open to almost all coalitions but price is gay marriage|work=]|first1=Michelle|last1=Martin|first2=Hans-Edzard|last2=Busemann|date=17 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625213202/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-greens-idUSKBN1980T7|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref> On 24 June, ] ] said that he would recommend that his party |
In March 2017, the SPD, the junior partner in the coalition government, announced they would press the CDU to legalise same-sex marriage in the face of overwhelming public support.<ref>{{cite news|title=Merkel's conservatives under pressure to allow gay marriage|work=dw.com|first=Carla|last=Bleiker|date=6 March 2017|access-date=8 March 2017|url=http://www.dw.com/en/merkels-conservatives-under-pressure-to-allow-gay-marriage/a-37830880}}</ref> The leader of the SPD in the Bundestag, ], said his party would introduce a bill, in addition to the long-pending bills of the Greens, The Left and the one referred from the Bundesrat,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=28395|title=Oppermann: SPD-Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe für alle noch im März|date=11 March 2017|publisher=Queer.de}}</ref> but eventually did not do so. On 20 June 2017, the ] rejected an application by the Greens for an injunction ordering the Legal Affairs Committee to send bills legalising same-sex marriage to lawmakers for a vote in Parliament's last ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/german-opposition-party-fails-force-gay-marriage-vote-n774656|title=German Opposition Party Fails to Force Gay Marriage Vote|agency=Associated Press|publisher=NBC News|date=20 June 2017}}</ref> On 17 June 2017, the Greens pledged not to participate in any governing coalition after the 2017 elections unless the legalisation of same-sex marriage was part of the agreement.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/german-greens-make-same-sex-marriage-guarantee-condition-of-coalition/a-39294421|title=German Greens make same-sex marriage guarantee condition of coalition|work=]|date=17 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625212929/http://www.dw.com/en/german-greens-make-same-sex-marriage-guarantee-condition-of-coalition/a-39294421|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-greens-idUSKBN1980T7|title=Germany's Greens open to almost all coalitions but price is gay marriage|work=]|first1=Michelle|last1=Martin|first2=Hans-Edzard|last2=Busemann|date=17 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625213202/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-greens-idUSKBN1980T7|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref> On 24 June, ] ] said that he would recommend that his party make a similar commitment,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-06/fdp-christian-lindner-ehe-fuer-alle|title=Lindner will Ehe für alle zur Koalitionsbedingung machen|publisher=]|language=de|date=24 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625220733/http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-06/fdp-christian-lindner-ehe-fuer-alle|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/fdp-macht-ehe-fuer-alle-zur-koalitionsbedingung-im-bund-15075368.html|title=FDP soll "Ehe für alle" zur Koalitionsbedingung machen|work=]|language=de|date=24 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625221408/https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/fdp-macht-ehe-fuer-alle-zur-koalitionsbedingung-im-bund-15075368.html|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref> and the following day the SPD made a similar pledge.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik/bundesparteitag-der-spd-schulz-macht-ehe-fuer-alle-zur-koalitionsbedingung-27856194|title=Bundesparteitag der SPD Schulz macht Ehe für alle zur Koalitionsbedingung|work=]|publisher=]|language=de|date=25 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625220038/http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik/bundesparteitag-der-spd-schulz-macht-ehe-fuer-alle-zur-koalitionsbedingung-27856194|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/politik/themen/schulz-ohne-homo-ehe-keine-koalition-mit-spd_aid-2404749|title=Schulz: Ohne Homo-Ehe keine Koalition mit SPD|work=]|language=de|date=25 June 2017|access-date=26 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625220456/https://www.saarbruecker-zeitung.de/politik/themen/schulz-ohne-homo-ehe-keine-koalition-mit-spd_aid-2404749|archive-date=25 June 2017}}</ref> | ||
===Bundestag vote and |
====Bundestag vote and approval==== | ||
] in ] on 1 October 2017, becoming the first same-sex couple to marry in Germany]] | ] in ] on 1 October 2017, becoming the first same-sex couple to marry in Germany]] | ||
In late June 2017, whilst answering audience questions at a public forum in ], ] ] unexpectedly stated that she hoped the question of same-sex marriage would be put to a ]. This was widely interpreted to mean that she would allow a vote in the Bundestag on the matter without party whip control by the Union parties.<ref name="BBCJune2017"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/is-angela-merkel-about-to-shift-her-partys-position-on-gay-marriage/a-39429463|title=Is Angela Merkel about to shift her party's position on gay marriage?|work=]|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> Shortly after her statement, several politicians, including ] ], pressured for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=29145|title=Ehe für alle: SPD kündigt Bundestags-Abstimmung noch in dieser Woche an|work=queer.de|language=de|date=27 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/bundestag-vote-on-gay-marriage-expected-in-coming-days/a-39440879|title=Bundestag vote on gay marriage expected in coming days|work=dw.com|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> On 27 June, both Union parties (] and ]) announced that they would allow their lawmakers a conscience vote, although they opposed a vote being held before the ]. The SPD '']'' breached the coalition agreement and planned on voting with the opposition parties to legalise same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/eil-merkel-gibt-abstimmung-ueber-ehe-fuer-alle-frei-1.3562640|title=Merkel gibt Abstimmung über Ehe für alle frei|work=Süddeutsche Zeitung|language=de|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> On 28 June, SPD, Green, and Left members of the Legal Affairs Committee voted to schedule a plenary vote on the bill proposed by the Bundesrat in 2015, outvoting CDU/CSU members.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/rechtsausschuss-beschliesst-bundestag-stimmt-ueber-ehe-fuer-alle-ab-15081050.html|title=Rechtsausschuss beschließt: Bundestag stimmt über 'Ehe für alle' ab|date=28 June 2017|work=]|access-date=28 June 2017|language=de|trans-title=Parliamentary committee decides: ''Bundestag'' shall vote on 'marriage for all'}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/german-parliament-paves-way-gay-marriage-vote-friday-091503292.html|title=German parliament paves way for gay marriage vote Friday|work=]|publisher=]|date=28 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://global.handelsblatt.com/politics/gay-marriage-nears-legalization-in-germany-788019|title=Gay Marriage Nears Legalization|work=Handelsblatt Global|date=28 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thelocal.de/20170628/gay-marriage-bill-to-be-voted-on-friday-as-government-feuds|title=Gay marriage bill to be voted on Friday, despite government feud over timing|work=The Local Germany|date=28 June 2017}}</ref> The Greens and The Left withdrew their own respective bills.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2017/kw26-de-ehe-fuer-alle/513682|title=Bundestag entscheidet möglicherweise über die "Ehe für alle"|publisher=]|language=de|date=28 June 2017|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629152836/http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2017/kw26-de-ehe-fuer-alle/513682|archive-date=29 June 2017}}</ref><ref name="dip21.bundestag.de">{{cite news|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/066/1806665.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|publisher=Bundestag|language=de|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629153710/http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/066/1806665.pdf|archive-date=29 June 2017}}</ref> | In late June 2017, whilst answering audience questions at a public forum in ], ] ] unexpectedly stated that she hoped the question of same-sex marriage would be put to a ]. This was widely interpreted to mean that she would allow a vote in the Bundestag on the matter without party whip control by the Union parties.<ref name="BBCJune2017"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/is-angela-merkel-about-to-shift-her-partys-position-on-gay-marriage/a-39429463|title=Is Angela Merkel about to shift her party's position on gay marriage?|work=]|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> Shortly after her statement, several politicians, including ] ], pressured for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=29145|title=Ehe für alle: SPD kündigt Bundestags-Abstimmung noch in dieser Woche an|work=queer.de|language=de|date=27 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/bundestag-vote-on-gay-marriage-expected-in-coming-days/a-39440879|title=Bundestag vote on gay marriage expected in coming days|work=dw.com|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> On 27 June, both Union parties (] and ]) announced that they would allow their lawmakers a conscience vote, although they opposed a vote being held before the ]. The SPD '']'' breached the coalition agreement and planned on voting with the opposition parties to legalise same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/eil-merkel-gibt-abstimmung-ueber-ehe-fuer-alle-frei-1.3562640|title=Merkel gibt Abstimmung über Ehe für alle frei|work=Süddeutsche Zeitung|language=de|date=27 June 2017}}</ref> On 28 June, SPD, Green, and Left members of the Legal Affairs Committee voted to schedule a plenary vote on the bill proposed by the Bundesrat in 2015, outvoting CDU/CSU members.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/rechtsausschuss-beschliesst-bundestag-stimmt-ueber-ehe-fuer-alle-ab-15081050.html|title=Rechtsausschuss beschließt: Bundestag stimmt über 'Ehe für alle' ab|date=28 June 2017|work=]|access-date=28 June 2017|language=de|trans-title=Parliamentary committee decides: ''Bundestag'' shall vote on 'marriage for all'}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/german-parliament-paves-way-gay-marriage-vote-friday-091503292.html|title=German parliament paves way for gay marriage vote Friday|work=]|publisher=]|date=28 June 2017|access-date=28 June 2017|archive-date=19 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119221706/https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/german-parliament-paves-way-gay-marriage-vote-friday-091503292.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://global.handelsblatt.com/politics/gay-marriage-nears-legalization-in-germany-788019|title=Gay Marriage Nears Legalization|work=Handelsblatt Global|date=28 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thelocal.de/20170628/gay-marriage-bill-to-be-voted-on-friday-as-government-feuds|title=Gay marriage bill to be voted on Friday, despite government feud over timing|work=The Local Germany|date=28 June 2017}}</ref> The Greens and The Left withdrew their own respective bills.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2017/kw26-de-ehe-fuer-alle/513682|title=Bundestag entscheidet möglicherweise über die "Ehe für alle"|publisher=]|language=de|date=28 June 2017|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629152836/http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2017/kw26-de-ehe-fuer-alle/513682|archive-date=29 June 2017}}</ref><ref name="dip21.bundestag.de">{{cite news|url=http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/066/1806665.pdf|title=Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|publisher=Bundestag|language=de|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629153710/http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/066/1806665.pdf|archive-date=29 June 2017}}</ref> | ||
On 30 June, the Bundestag debated and passed the bill by 393–226 with 4 abstentions and 7 absentees.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/2017-06/bundestag-stimmt-fuer-ehe-fuer-alle|title=Bundestag: Große Mehrheit stimmt für Ehe für alle|date=30 June 2017|work=]|access-date=30 June 2017|language=de|trans-title=Bundestag: large majority votes in favour of 'marriage for all'}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/world/europe/germany-gay-marriage.html|title=Parliament in Germany Approves Same-Sex Marriage|last1=Smale|first1=Alison|date=30 June 2017|work=]|access-date=30 June 2017|last2=Shimer|first2=David|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703142747/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/world/europe/germany-gay-marriage.html|archive-date=3 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germanys-bundestag-passes-bill-on-same-sex-marriage/a-39483785|title=Germany's Bundestag passes bill on same-sex marriage|work=]|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701052142/http://www.dw.com/en/germanys-bundestag-passes-bill-on-same-sex-marriage/a-39483785|archive-date=1 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/30/germany-poised-legalise-same-sex-marriage-bill-law|title=German parliament votes to legalise same-sex marriage|work=The Guardian|date=30 June 2017}}</ref> Merkel herself, whose change of position had led to the vote being held, voted against the legislation, but said she hoped the result "not only promotes respect between the different opinions but also brings more social cohesion and peace".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/30/why-angela-merkel-known-for-embracing-liberal-values-voted-against-same-sex-marriage/|title=Why Angela Merkel, known for embracing liberal values, voted against same-sex marriage|newspaper=Washington Post|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170929144859/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/30/why-angela-merkel-known-for-embracing-liberal-values-voted-against-same-sex-marriage/|archive-date=29 September 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gay-marriage-idUSKBN19L0PQ|title=German lawmakers approve same-sex marriage in landmark vote|work=Reuters|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701072305/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gay-marriage-idUSKBN19L0PQ|archive-date=1 July 2017}}</ref> On 7 July, the ] approved the bill without a vote because there were no requests for changes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/laenderkammer-bundesrat-stimmt-oeffnung-der-ehe-zu-15095538.html|title=Länderkammer: Bundesrat stimmt Öffnung der Ehe zu|date=7 July 2017|work=]|access-date=7 July 2017|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article166360698/Warum-sich-die-CSU-im-Bundesrat-kampflos-ergibt.html|title=Ehe für alle: Im Bundesrat ergibt sich die CSU kampflos|last=Arab|first=Adrian|date=6 July 2017|newspaper=]|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: CSU gives up without a fight in the Bundesrat|access-date=7 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=BundesratPassage>{{cite web |url=http://www.dw.com/en/same-sex-marriage-bill-clears-german-upper-house/a-39593290 |title=Same-sex marriage bill clears German upper house |date=7 July 2017 |access-date=7 July 2017 |publisher=] |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708005816/http://www.dw.com/en/same-sex-marriage-bill-clears-german-upper-house/a-39593290 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/07/07/germanys-upper-house-gives-green-light-to-equal-marriage/ |title=Germany's upper house gives green light to equal marriage |publisher=PinkNews |last=Duffy |first=Nick |date=7 July 2017 |access-date=7 July 2017 |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708152430/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/07/07/germanys-upper-house-gives-green-light-to-equal-marriage/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> The bill was signed into law on 20 July 2017 by ] ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/germanys-first-same-sex-marriages-expected-in-october|title=Germany's first same-sex marriages expected in October|date=21 July 2017|work=The Local|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721180146/https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/germanys-first-same-sex-marriages-expected-in-october|archive-date=21 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=reference74>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/german-president-signs-gay-marriage-bill-into-law/a-39795137|title=German president signs gay marriage bill into law|work=Deutsche Welle|date=21 July 2017|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721181105/http://www.dw.com/en/german-president-signs-gay-marriage-bill-into-law/a-39795137|archive-date=21 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite |
On 30 June, the Bundestag debated and passed the bill by 393–226 with 4 abstentions and 7 absentees.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/2017-06/bundestag-stimmt-fuer-ehe-fuer-alle|title=Bundestag: Große Mehrheit stimmt für Ehe für alle|date=30 June 2017|work=]|access-date=30 June 2017|language=de|trans-title=Bundestag: large majority votes in favour of 'marriage for all'}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/world/europe/germany-gay-marriage.html|title=Parliament in Germany Approves Same-Sex Marriage|last1=Smale|first1=Alison|date=30 June 2017|work=]|access-date=30 June 2017|last2=Shimer|first2=David|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703142747/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/world/europe/germany-gay-marriage.html|archive-date=3 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germanys-bundestag-passes-bill-on-same-sex-marriage/a-39483785|title=Germany's Bundestag passes bill on same-sex marriage|work=]|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701052142/http://www.dw.com/en/germanys-bundestag-passes-bill-on-same-sex-marriage/a-39483785|archive-date=1 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/30/germany-poised-legalise-same-sex-marriage-bill-law|title=German parliament votes to legalise same-sex marriage|work=The Guardian|date=30 June 2017}}</ref> Merkel herself, whose change of position had led to the vote being held, voted against the legislation, but said she hoped the result "not only promotes respect between the different opinions but also brings more social cohesion and peace".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/30/why-angela-merkel-known-for-embracing-liberal-values-voted-against-same-sex-marriage/|title=Why Angela Merkel, known for embracing liberal values, voted against same-sex marriage|newspaper=Washington Post|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170929144859/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/30/why-angela-merkel-known-for-embracing-liberal-values-voted-against-same-sex-marriage/|archive-date=29 September 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gay-marriage-idUSKBN19L0PQ|title=German lawmakers approve same-sex marriage in landmark vote|work=Reuters|date=30 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701072305/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gay-marriage-idUSKBN19L0PQ|archive-date=1 July 2017}}</ref> On 7 July, the ] approved the bill without a vote because there were no requests for changes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/laenderkammer-bundesrat-stimmt-oeffnung-der-ehe-zu-15095538.html|title=Länderkammer: Bundesrat stimmt Öffnung der Ehe zu|date=7 July 2017|work=]|access-date=7 July 2017|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article166360698/Warum-sich-die-CSU-im-Bundesrat-kampflos-ergibt.html|title=Ehe für alle: Im Bundesrat ergibt sich die CSU kampflos|last=Arab|first=Adrian|date=6 July 2017|newspaper=]|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: CSU gives up without a fight in the Bundesrat|access-date=7 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=BundesratPassage>{{cite web |url=http://www.dw.com/en/same-sex-marriage-bill-clears-german-upper-house/a-39593290 |title=Same-sex marriage bill clears German upper house |date=7 July 2017 |access-date=7 July 2017 |publisher=] |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708005816/http://www.dw.com/en/same-sex-marriage-bill-clears-german-upper-house/a-39593290 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/07/07/germanys-upper-house-gives-green-light-to-equal-marriage/ |title=Germany's upper house gives green light to equal marriage |publisher=PinkNews |last=Duffy |first=Nick |date=7 July 2017 |access-date=7 July 2017 |archive-date=8 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708152430/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/07/07/germanys-upper-house-gives-green-light-to-equal-marriage/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> The bill was signed into law on 20 July 2017 by ] ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/germanys-first-same-sex-marriages-expected-in-october|title=Germany's first same-sex marriages expected in October|date=21 July 2017|work=The Local|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721180146/https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/germanys-first-same-sex-marriages-expected-in-october|archive-date=21 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=reference74>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/german-president-signs-gay-marriage-bill-into-law/a-39795137|title=German president signs gay marriage bill into law|work=Deutsche Welle|date=21 July 2017|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721181105/http://www.dw.com/en/german-president-signs-gay-marriage-bill-into-law/a-39795137|archive-date=21 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-frank-walter-steinmeier-bundespraesident-unterzeichnung|title=Gesetz zur Ehe für alle unterzeichnet|newspaper=Die Zeit|date=21 July 2017|access-date=21 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170721180823/http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-frank-walter-steinmeier-bundespraesident-unterzeichnung|archive-date=21 July 2017}}</ref> It was published on 28 July in the {{Lang|de|]}} and came into force the first day of the third month after publication (i.e. 1 October 2017).<ref>{{cite web|title=Gesetz zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|url=http://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl117s2787.pdf|publisher=]|language=de|date=28 July 2017|access-date=28 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.n-tv.de/politik/Ehe-fuer-alle-gilt-ab-1-Oktober-article19958644.html|title=Ehe für alle gilt ab 1. Oktober|publisher=]|language=de|date=28 July 2017|access-date=28 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170728193910/http://www.n-tv.de/politik/Ehe-fuer-alle-gilt-ab-1-Oktober-article19958644.html|archive-date=28 July 2017}}</ref> Hundreds of same-sex couples were married all over Germany that day, with the first same-sex wedding taking place in ], Berlin between Karl Kreile and Bodo Mende.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-equalmarriage/germanys-first-same-sex-i-dos-as-marriage-equality-dawns-idUKKCN1C50TA|title=Germany's first same-sex "I do"'s as marriage equality dawns|work=]|date=1 October 2017|access-date=1 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171001185951/http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-equalmarriage/germanys-first-same-sex-i-dos-as-marriage-equality-dawns-idUKKCN1C50TA|archive-date=1 October 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41460032|title=Germany gay marriage: Couple are first to marry under new law|work=]|date=1 October 2017|access-date=1 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009055619/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41460032|archive-date=9 October 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://apnews.com/381066ff25604ea88991e74a87912053|title=Germany celebrates 1st same-sex weddings after law change|work=]|date=1 October 2017|first=Frank|last=Jordans|access-date=1 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171009055350/https://apnews.com/381066ff25604ea88991e74a87912053|archive-date=9 October 2017}}</ref> | ||
The same-sex marriage law was short; it added the following sentence to Article 1353 of the '']'':<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www. |
The same-sex marriage law was short; it added the following sentence to Article 1353 of the '']'':<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1353.html|title=Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB), § 1353 Eheliche Lebensgemeinschaft|work=www.gesetze-im-internet.de|access-date=16 June 2020|language=de}}</ref> ''Marriage may be entered into for life by two persons of different sex or of the same sex.''{{efn|{{langx|de|Die Ehe wird von zwei Personen verschiedenen oder gleichen Geschlechts auf Lebenszeit geschlossen.}}}} | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ 30 June 2017 vote in the ]<ref>, 30 June 2017, Bundestag</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/sites/abgeordnetenwatch.de/files/press-articles/berlinerzeitung_03.07.2017._ehe_fuer_alle_so_haben_die_abgeordneten_abgestimmt.pdf|title=Ehe für alle: So haben die Abgeordneten abgestimmt – die Namensliste|date=30 June 2017|website=Abgeordnetenwatch|language=de|access-date=9 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://public.tableau.com/profile/analphabit#!/vizhome/Ehe_fr_alle_0/Dashboard2|title=Ehe für alle - überall? (Das Abstimmungsverhalten der 630 Bundestagsabgeordneten)|date=8 July 2017|website=Public Tableau|language=de|access-date=9 July 2017}}</ref> | |+ 30 June 2017 vote in the ]<ref>, 30 June 2017, Bundestag</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/sites/abgeordnetenwatch.de/files/press-articles/berlinerzeitung_03.07.2017._ehe_fuer_alle_so_haben_die_abgeordneten_abgestimmt.pdf|title=Ehe für alle: So haben die Abgeordneten abgestimmt – die Namensliste|date=30 June 2017|website=Abgeordnetenwatch|language=de|access-date=9 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://public.tableau.com/profile/analphabit#!/vizhome/Ehe_fr_alle_0/Dashboard2|title=Ehe für alle - überall? (Das Abstimmungsverhalten der 630 Bundestagsabgeordneten)|date=8 July 2017|website=Public Tableau|language=de|access-date=9 July 2017}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Party !! Voted for !! Voted against !! Abstained !! Did not vote | ! Party !! style="width:20%;"| Voted for !! Voted against !! Abstained !! Absent (Did not vote) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{Color box|{{party color|CDU |
| {{Color box|{{party color|CDU}}|''']'''|border=silver}} ] (CDU) | ||
|{{collapsible list|title=69 | |||
| '''75''' | |||
|1=] | |||
| style="background-color:#FFAEB9;" | '''225''' | |||
|2=] | |||
| '''4''' | |||
|3=] | |||
| '''5''' | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
|45=] | |||
|46=] | |||
|47=] | |||
|48=] | |||
|49=] | |||
|50=] | |||
|51=] | |||
|52=] | |||
|53=] | |||
|54=] | |||
|55=] | |||
|56=] | |||
|57=] | |||
|58=] | |||
|59=] | |||
|60=] | |||
|61=] | |||
|62=] | |||
|63=] | |||
|64=] | |||
|65=] | |||
|66=] | |||
|67=] | |||
|68=] | |||
|69=] | |||
}} | |||
|style="background-color:#FFAEB9;" |{{collapsible list|title=181 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
|45=] | |||
|46=] | |||
|47=] | |||
|48=] | |||
|49=] | |||
|50=] | |||
|51=] | |||
|52=] | |||
|53=] | |||
|54=] | |||
|55=] | |||
|56=] | |||
|57=] | |||
|58=] | |||
|59=] | |||
|60=] | |||
|61=] | |||
|62=] | |||
|63=] | |||
|64=] | |||
|65=] | |||
|66=] | |||
|67=] | |||
|68=] | |||
|69=] | |||
|70=] | |||
|71=] | |||
|72=] | |||
|73=] | |||
|74=] | |||
|75=] | |||
|76=] | |||
|77=] | |||
|78=] | |||
|79=] | |||
|80=] | |||
|81=] | |||
|82=] | |||
|83=] | |||
|84=] | |||
|85=] | |||
|86=] | |||
|87=] | |||
|88=] | |||
|89=] | |||
|90=] | |||
|91=] | |||
|92=] | |||
|93=] | |||
|94=] | |||
|95=] | |||
|96=] | |||
|97=] | |||
|98=] | |||
|99=] | |||
|100=] | |||
|101=] | |||
|102=] | |||
|103=] | |||
|104=] | |||
|105=] | |||
|106=] | |||
|107=] | |||
|108=] | |||
|109=] | |||
|110=] | |||
|111=] | |||
|112=] | |||
|113=] | |||
|114=] | |||
|115=] | |||
|116=] | |||
|117=] | |||
|118=] | |||
|119=] | |||
|120=] | |||
|121=] | |||
|122=] | |||
|123=] | |||
|124=] | |||
|125=] | |||
|126=] | |||
|127=] | |||
|128=] | |||
|129=] | |||
|130=] | |||
|131=] | |||
|132=] | |||
|133=] | |||
|134=] | |||
|135=] | |||
|136=] | |||
|137=] | |||
|138=] | |||
|139=] | |||
|140=] | |||
|141=] | |||
|142=] | |||
|143=] | |||
|144=] | |||
|145=] | |||
|146=] | |||
|147=] | |||
|148=] | |||
|149=] | |||
|150=] | |||
|151=] | |||
|152=] | |||
|153=] | |||
|154=] | |||
|155=] | |||
|156=] | |||
|157=] | |||
|158=] | |||
|159=] | |||
|160=] | |||
|161=] | |||
|162=] | |||
|163=] | |||
|164=] | |||
|165=] | |||
|166=] | |||
|167=] | |||
|168=] | |||
|169=] | |||
|170=] | |||
|171=] | |||
|172=] | |||
|173=] | |||
|174=] | |||
|175=] | |||
|176=] | |||
|177=] | |||
|178=] | |||
|179=] | |||
|180=] | |||
|181=] | |||
}} | |||
|{{collapsible list|title=3 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
}} | |||
|{{collapsible list|title=3 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{Color box|{{party color|Social Democratic Party of Germany}}|''']'''|border=silver}} ] (SPD) | | {{Color box|{{party color|Social Democratic Party of Germany}}|''']'''|border=silver}} ] (SPD) | ||
| |
|style="background-color:#CCFFCC;" |{{collapsible list|title=192 | ||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
|45=] | |||
|46=] | |||
|47=] | |||
|48=] | |||
|49=] | |||
|50=] | |||
|51=] | |||
|52=] | |||
|53=] | |||
|54=] | |||
|55=] | |||
|56=] | |||
|57=] | |||
|58=] | |||
|59=] | |||
|60=] | |||
|61=] | |||
|62=] | |||
|63=] | |||
|64=] | |||
|65=] | |||
|66=] | |||
|67=] | |||
|68=] | |||
|69=] | |||
|70=] | |||
|71=] | |||
|72=] | |||
|73=] | |||
|74=] | |||
|75=] | |||
|76=] | |||
|77=] | |||
|78=] | |||
|79=] | |||
|80=] | |||
|81=] | |||
|82=] | |||
|83=] | |||
|84=] | |||
|85=] | |||
|86=] | |||
|87=] | |||
|88=] | |||
|89=] | |||
|90=] | |||
|91=] | |||
|92=] | |||
|93=] | |||
|94=] | |||
|95=] | |||
|96=] | |||
|97=] | |||
|98=] | |||
|99=] | |||
|100=] | |||
|101=] | |||
|102=] | |||
|103=] | |||
|104=] | |||
|105=] | |||
|106=] | |||
|107=] | |||
|108=] | |||
|109=] | |||
|110=] | |||
|111=] | |||
|112=] | |||
|113=] | |||
|114=] | |||
|115=] | |||
|116=] | |||
|117=] | |||
|118=] | |||
|119=] | |||
|120=] | |||
|121=] | |||
|122=] | |||
|123=] | |||
|124=] | |||
|125=] | |||
|126=] | |||
|127=] | |||
|128=] | |||
|129=] | |||
|130=] | |||
|131=] | |||
|132=] | |||
|133=] | |||
|134=] | |||
|135=] | |||
|136=] | |||
|137=] | |||
|138=] | |||
|139=] | |||
|140=] | |||
|141=] | |||
|142=] | |||
|143=] | |||
|144=] | |||
|145=] | |||
|146=] | |||
|147=] | |||
|148=] | |||
|149=] | |||
|150=] | |||
|151=] | |||
|152=] | |||
|153=] | |||
|154=] | |||
|155=] | |||
|156=] | |||
|157=] | |||
|158=] | |||
|159=] | |||
|160=] | |||
|161=] | |||
|162=] | |||
|163=] | |||
|164=] | |||
|165=] | |||
|166=] | |||
|167=] | |||
|168=] | |||
|169=] | |||
|170=] | |||
|171=] | |||
|172=] | |||
|173=] | |||
|174=] | |||
|175=] | |||
|176=] | |||
|177=] | |||
|178=] | |||
|179=] | |||
|180=] | |||
|181=] | |||
|182=] | |||
|183=] | |||
|184=] | |||
|185=] | |||
|186=] | |||
|187=] | |||
|188=] | |||
|189=] | |||
|190=] | |||
|191=] | |||
|192=] | |||
}} | |||
| – | | – | ||
| – | | – | ||
|{{collapsible list |title=1 | |||
| '''1''' | |||
|1=] | |||
}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{Color box|{{party color|The Left (Germany)}}|border=silver}} ] (Die Linke) | | {{Color box|{{party color|The Left (Germany)}}|border=silver}} ] (Die Linke) | ||
| style="background-color:#CCFFCC;" | |
| style="background-color:#CCFFCC;" |{{collapsible list |title=63 | ||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
|45=] | |||
|46=] | |||
|47=] | |||
|48=] | |||
|49=] | |||
|50=] | |||
|51=] | |||
|52=] | |||
|53=] | |||
|54=] | |||
|55=] | |||
|56=] | |||
|57=] | |||
|58=] | |||
|59=] | |||
|60=] | |||
|61=] | |||
|62=] | |||
|63=] | |||
}} | |||
| – | | – | ||
| – | | – | ||
|{{collapsible list |title=1 | |||
| '''1''' | |||
|1=] | |||
}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{Color box|{{party color|Alliance 90/The Greens}}|border=silver}} ] (B90/Grüne) | | {{Color box|{{party color|Alliance 90/The Greens}}|border=silver}} ] (B90/Grüne) | ||
| style="background-color:#CCFFCC;" | |
| style="background-color:#CCFFCC;" |{{collapsible list |title=63 | ||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
|45=] | |||
|46=] | |||
|47=] | |||
|48=] | |||
|49=] | |||
|50=] | |||
|51=] | |||
|52=] | |||
|53=] | |||
|54=] | |||
|55=] | |||
|56=] | |||
|57=] | |||
|58=] | |||
|59=] | |||
|60=] | |||
|61=] | |||
|62=] | |||
|63=] | |||
}} | |||
| – | | – | ||
| – | | – | ||
| – | | – | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{Color box|{{party color|Christian Social Union of Bavaria}}|''']'''|border=silver}} ] (CSU) | |||
| {{Color box|grey|border=silver}} ] | |||
|{{collapsible list|title=6 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
}} | |||
|style="background-color:#FFAEB9;" |{{collapsible list|title=44 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
|3=] | |||
|4=] | |||
|5=] | |||
|6=] | |||
|7=] | |||
|8=] | |||
|9=] | |||
|10=] | |||
|11=] | |||
|12=] | |||
|13=] | |||
|14=] | |||
|15=] | |||
|16=] | |||
|17=] | |||
|18=] | |||
|19=] | |||
|20=] | |||
|21=] | |||
|22=] | |||
|23=] | |||
|24=] | |||
|25=] | |||
|26=] | |||
|27=] | |||
|28=] | |||
|29=] | |||
|30=] | |||
|31=] | |||
|32=] | |||
|33=] | |||
|34=] | |||
|35=] | |||
|36=] | |||
|37=] | |||
|38=] | |||
|39=] | |||
|40=] | |||
|41=] | |||
|42=] | |||
|43=] | |||
|44=] | |||
}} | |||
|{{collapsible list|title=1 | |||
|1=] | |||
}} | |||
|{{collapsible list|title=2 | |||
|1=] | |||
|2=] | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
|{{color box|{{party color|Independent}}|border=silver}} ] | |||
| – | | – | ||
| style="background-color:#FFAEB9;" | |
| style="background-color:#FFAEB9;" |{{collapsible list|title=1 | ||
|1=] | |||
}} | |||
| – | | – | ||
| – | | – | ||
Line 126: | Line 778: | ||
====Reaction and aftermath==== | ====Reaction and aftermath==== | ||
], July 2017]] | ], July 2017]] | ||
] building in Berlin, 15 September 2017]] | |||
Several legal experts, including MPs and party leaders, raised doubts about the legality of the law, with former President of the Federal Constitutional Court ] arguing that same-sex marriage is inconsistent with previous definitions of marriage espoused by the court.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ehe-fuer-alle-ex-verfassungsrichter-hans-juergen-papier-haelt-sie-fuer-verfassungswidrig-a-1155215.html|title=Hans-Jürgen Papier: Ex-Verfassungsrichter hält Ehe für alle für grundgesetzwidrig|date=2 July 2017|newspaper=Spiegel Online|language=de|trans-title=Hans-Jürgen Papier: former justice of the Constitutional Court considers 'marriage for all' unconstitutional|access-date=2 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.focus-fen.net/opinion/2017/07/02/4779/germany-approves-gay-marriage-next-stop-constitutional-court.html|title=Germany Approves Gay Marriage: Next Stop Constitutional Court?|work=focus-fen.net|date=2 July 2017}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-verfassungsklage-bundesverfassungsgericht-faq/|title=Ehe für alle: Könnte eine Klage gegen die Ehe für alle erfolgreich sein?|date=2 July 2017|work=]|access-date=2 July 2017|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: could a constitutional complaint be successful?}}</ref> Article 6(1) of the ] places "marriage and family" under the "special protection of the state order".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-volker-kauder-grundgesetz-bundesverfassungsgericht|title=Ehe für alle: Kauder rechnet mit Verfassungsklage|date=1 July 2017|work=]|access-date=2 July 2017|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: Kauder expects constitutional complaint}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ehe-fuer-alle-afd-will-vor-bundesverfassungsgericht-klagen-a-1155438.html|title=AfD will gegen Ehe für alle klagen|date=2 July 2017|newspaper=]|language=de|access-date=2 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Selected National, European and International Provisions from Public and Private Law|publisher=Europa Law Publishing|year=2010|editor-last=Kiiver|editor-first=Philipp|pages=27|editor-last2=Kornet|editor-first2=Nicole}}</ref> An amendment to the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Parliament. These concerns were dismissed by Federal Justice Minister ], who argued that Article 6(1) neither defines the term "marriage" nor rules out a wider definition.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
Several legal experts, including MPs and party leaders, raised doubts about the legality of the law, with former President of the Federal Constitutional Court ] arguing that same-sex marriage is inconsistent with previous definitions of marriage espoused by the court.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ehe-fuer-alle-ex-verfassungsrichter-hans-juergen-papier-haelt-sie-fuer-verfassungswidrig-a-1155215.html|title=Hans-Jürgen Papier: Ex-Verfassungsrichter hält Ehe für alle für grundgesetzwidrig|date=2 July 2017|newspaper=Spiegel Online|language=de|trans-title=Hans-Jürgen Papier: former justice of the Constitutional Court considers 'marriage for all' unconstitutional|access-date=2 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.focus-fen.net/opinion/2017/07/02/4779/germany-approves-gay-marriage-next-stop-constitutional-court.html|title=Germany Approves Gay Marriage: Next Stop Constitutional Court?|work=focus-fen.net|date=2 July 2017|access-date=2 July 2017|archive-date=18 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181118141311/http://www.focus-fen.net/opinion/2017/07/02/4779/germany-approves-gay-marriage-next-stop-constitutional-court.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-verfassungsklage-bundesverfassungsgericht-faq/|title=Ehe für alle: Könnte eine Klage gegen die Ehe für alle erfolgreich sein?|date=2 July 2017|work=]|access-date=2 July 2017|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: could a constitutional complaint be successful?}}</ref> Article 6(1) of the ] places "marriage and family" under the "special protection of the state order".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-volker-kauder-grundgesetz-bundesverfassungsgericht|title=Ehe für alle: Kauder rechnet mit Verfassungsklage|date=1 July 2017|work=]|access-date=2 July 2017|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: Kauder expects constitutional complaint}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ehe-fuer-alle-afd-will-vor-bundesverfassungsgericht-klagen-a-1155438.html|title=AfD will gegen Ehe für alle klagen|date=2 July 2017|newspaper=]|language=de|access-date=2 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Selected National, European and International Provisions from Public and Private Law|publisher=Europa Law Publishing|year=2010|editor-last=Kiiver|editor-first=Philipp|pages=27|editor-last2=Kornet|editor-first2=Nicole}}</ref> An amendment to the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Parliament. These concerns were dismissed by Federal Justice Minister ], who argued that Article 6(1) neither defines the term "marriage" nor rules out a wider definition.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
Following the passage of the law, the ] and the ] (AfD) party both said they would consider petitioning the court for a ] ({{lang|de|abstrakte Normenkontrolle}}).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-csu-horst-seehofer-klage-pruefung|title=Gleichstellung: Seehofer prüft Verfassungsklage gegen Ehe für alle|date=4 July 2017|work=Die Zeit|access-date=4 July 2017|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.eu/article/germanys-afd-threatens-law-suit-over-gay-marriage/|title=Germany's AfD threatens law suit over gay marriage|work=Politico Europe|date=2 July 2017}}</ref> However, the AfD lacked ] to bring a challenge, as it was not part of the federal government |
Following the passage of the law, the ] and the ] (AfD) party both said they would consider petitioning the court for a ] ({{lang|de|abstrakte Normenkontrolle}}).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2017-07/ehe-fuer-alle-csu-horst-seehofer-klage-pruefung|title=Gleichstellung: Seehofer prüft Verfassungsklage gegen Ehe für alle|date=4 July 2017|work=Die Zeit|access-date=4 July 2017|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.eu/article/germanys-afd-threatens-law-suit-over-gay-marriage/|title=Germany's AfD threatens law suit over gay marriage|work=Politico Europe|date=2 July 2017}}</ref> However, the AfD lacked ] to bring a challenge, as it was not part of the federal government nor any state government. It also did not have any representation in the Bundestag at the time, and did not reach the necessary quarter of Bundestag members in the 2017 election.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ehe-fuer-alle-klagen-vor-dem-bundesverfassungsgericht-sind-sehr-unwahrscheinlich-a-1155755.html|title=Ehe für alle: Sie wollen klagen - aber sie können nicht|last=Hipp|first=Dietmar|date=3 July 2017|newspaper=Spiegel Online|language=de|trans-title=Marriage for all: they want to sue, but they can't|access-date=4 July 2017}}</ref> On 6 March 2018, the Bavarian Government announced it would not challenge the law, after commissioned assessments found its chances to be successful as low.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bayern.de/bericht-aus-der-kabinettssitzung-vom-6-maerz-2018/?seite=1579|title=Bericht aus der Kabinettssitzung vom 6. März 2018|publisher=Government of Bavaria|language=de|date=6 March 2018|access-date=9 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309010349/http://www.bayern.de/bericht-aus-der-kabinettssitzung-vom-6-maerz-2018/?seite=1579|archive-date=9 March 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.welt.de/regionales/bayern/article174247358/Bayern-klagt-nicht-gegen-die-Ehe-fuer-alle.html|title=Bayern klagt nicht gegen die Ehe für alle|work=Deutsche Presse-Agentur|publisher=Die Welt|language=de|date=6 March 2018|access-date=9 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309012336/https://www.welt.de/regionales/bayern/article174247358/Bayern-klagt-nicht-gegen-die-Ehe-fuer-alle.html|archive-date=9 March 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/bavaria-drops-gay-marriage-challenge/|title=German state drops gay marriage legal challenge as they have 'no chance of winning'|first=Jamie|last=Wareham|publisher=]|date=8 March 2018|access-date=9 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309014852/https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/bavaria-drops-gay-marriage-challenge/|archive-date=9 March 2018}}</ref> | ||
In September 2018, nearly a year after legalization, the AfD introduced a motion to the Bundestag to abolish same-sex marriage. The measure was rejected on 11 October,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=31361|title=AfD will Eheverbot für Schwule und Lesben wieder einführen|work=Queer.de|date=15 June 2018|last=Klein|first=Dennis}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=32030|title=Bundestag: AfD bringt Antrag zur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle ein|work=Queer.de|date=27 September 2018}}</ref> with every other political party opposing the motion. Several Green and CDU/CSU lawmakers instead congratulated the thousands of same-sex couples who had married in Germany in the past year, while other MPs criticised the AfD for their proposal, calling it "undemocratic", "wrong", "a cheap political trick at the expense of free society" or even "lazy as hell".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=32122|title=Antrag gegen Ehe für alle: Bundestag nimmt AfD auseinander|first=Norbert|last=Blech|website=queer.de}}</ref> In June 2019, the AfD re-introduced a motion to repeal the same-sex marriage law in both the Legal Affairs Committee and the Family Committee. The proposal was rejected by every other political party. The CDU/CSU stated that "the constitutional concept of marriage is open to same-sex couples". The Social Democrats criticized the AfD for trying to "reopen a completed constitutional debate", while the FDP criticized that a renewed marriage ban for same-sex couples would "reduce their freedom". The Left considered the AfD draft to be a "deliberate provocation aimed at denying equal rights to sexual minorities", and the Greens pointed out that there is "broad political and social majority" support for same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=34019|title=AfD-Vorstoś sur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle abgelehnt|work=Queer.de|date=9 July 2019|language=de}}</ref> That same month, the AfD presented a motion to the ] to force the ] to challenge the same-sex marriage law at the Federal Constitutional Court. The motion was opposed by every other political party.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=31950|title=AfD macht im Landtag Stimmung gegen die Ehe für alle|work=Queer.de|date=14 September 2018|last=Klein|first=Dennis}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://m.huffingtonpost.de/entry/afd-will-offenbar-ehe-fur-alle-wieder-abschaffen_de_5bb1ada1e4b0343b3dc187bf|title=AfD will Ehe für alle wieder abschaffen|work=The Huffington Post|date=1 October 2018}}</ref> | In September 2018, nearly a year after legalization, the AfD introduced a motion to the Bundestag to abolish same-sex marriage. The measure was rejected on 11 October,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=31361|title=AfD will Eheverbot für Schwule und Lesben wieder einführen|work=Queer.de|date=15 June 2018|last=Klein|first=Dennis}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=32030|title=Bundestag: AfD bringt Antrag zur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle ein|work=Queer.de|date=27 September 2018}}</ref> with every other political party opposing the motion. Several Green and CDU/CSU lawmakers instead congratulated the thousands of same-sex couples who had married in Germany in the past year, while other MPs criticised the AfD for their proposal, calling it "undemocratic", "wrong", "a cheap political trick at the expense of free society" or even "lazy as hell".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=32122|title=Antrag gegen Ehe für alle: Bundestag nimmt AfD auseinander|first=Norbert|last=Blech|website=queer.de}}</ref> In June 2019, the AfD re-introduced a motion to repeal the same-sex marriage law in both the Legal Affairs Committee and the Family Committee. The proposal was rejected by every other political party. The CDU/CSU stated that "the constitutional concept of marriage is open to same-sex couples". The Social Democrats criticized the AfD for trying to "reopen a completed constitutional debate", while the FDP criticized that a renewed marriage ban for same-sex couples would "reduce their freedom". The Left considered the AfD draft to be a "deliberate provocation aimed at denying equal rights to sexual minorities", and the Greens pointed out that there is "broad political and social majority" support for same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=34019|title=AfD-Vorstoś sur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle abgelehnt|work=Queer.de|date=9 July 2019|language=de}}</ref> That same month, the AfD presented a motion to the ] to force the ] to challenge the same-sex marriage law at the Federal Constitutional Court. The motion was unsuccessful and opposed by every other political party in the Landtag.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=31950|title=AfD macht im Landtag Stimmung gegen die Ehe für alle|work=Queer.de|date=14 September 2018|last=Klein|first=Dennis}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://m.huffingtonpost.de/entry/afd-will-offenbar-ehe-fur-alle-wieder-abschaffen_de_5bb1ada1e4b0343b3dc187bf|title=AfD will Ehe für alle wieder abschaffen|work=The Huffington Post|date=1 October 2018|access-date=7 October 2018|archive-date=28 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328175902/https://m.huffingtonpost.de/entry/afd-will-offenbar-ehe-fur-alle-wieder-abschaffen_de_5bb1ada1e4b0343b3dc187bf|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
In December 2018, the German Parliament passed legislation amending several laws to reflect the legalisation of same-sex marriage, including with regard to the recognition of foreign same-sex marriages and the conversions of registered life partnerships to marriages.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzer.de/gesetz/13245/index.htm|title=EheRAnpG Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen|website=www.buzer.de}}</ref> | In December 2018, the German Parliament passed legislation amending several laws to reflect the legalisation of same-sex marriage, including with regard to the recognition of foreign same-sex marriages and the conversions of registered life partnerships to marriages.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzer.de/gesetz/13245/index.htm|title=EheRAnpG Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen|website=www.buzer.de}}</ref> | ||
=== Marriage statistics === | === Marriage statistics === | ||
According to the ], up to |
According to the ], up to 84,000 same-sex marriages had taken place in Germany by the end of 2023, a large proportion being conversions from registered partnerships.<ref name=destatis/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lsvd.de/de/ct/1429-Wie-viele-gleichgeschlechtliche-Ehen-gibt-es-in-Deutschland|title=Wie viele gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe gibt es in Deutschland?|work=Lesben- under Schwulenverband|date=|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=31997|title=Tausende schwule und lesbische Paare haben geheiratet|website=queer.de}}</ref><ref>, ''The Local.de'', 28 September 2018</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dw.com/en/germany-publishes-data-on-first-5-years-of-same-sex-marriage/a-62362887|title=Germany publishes data on first 5 years of same-sex marriage|last=Connor|first=Richard|date=5 July 2022|work=Deutsche Welle}}</ref> | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+Marriages in Germany<ref name=destatis>{{cite web|url= https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Eheschliessungen-Ehescheidungen-Lebenspartnerschaften/Tabellen/eheschliessungen-paarkonstellation.html|title= Eheschließungen nach den Paarkonstellationen der Ehe|work=Statistiches Bundesamt|language=de}}</ref> | |+Marriages in Germany<ref name=destatis>{{cite web|url= https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Eheschliessungen-Ehescheidungen-Lebenspartnerschaften/Tabellen/eheschliessungen-paarkonstellation.html|title= Eheschließungen nach den Paarkonstellationen der Ehe|work=Statistiches Bundesamt|language=de|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231017115956/https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Eheschliessungen-Ehescheidungen-Lebenspartnerschaften/Tabellen/eheschliessungen-paarkonstellation.html|archive-date=17 October 2023}}</ref> | ||
! rowspan=2| Year | ! rowspan=2| Year | ||
! colspan=3| Same-sex marriages | ! colspan=3| Same-sex marriages | ||
Line 150: | Line 803: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2017 |
|2017{{efn|from October}}||6,080||5,067||11,147||92,209||103,356||12.1% | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2018||10,686||11,071||21,757||449,466||482,370||4.51% | |2018||10,686||11,071||21,757||449,466||482,370||4.51% | ||
Line 161: | Line 814: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2022||4,664||5,379||10,043||380,700||390,743||2.57% | |2022||4,664||5,379||10,043||380,700||390,743||2.57% | ||
|- | |||
|2023||4,319||4,909||9,226||351,766||360,992||2.55% | |||
|} | |} | ||
680 same-sex couples married in ] from October to the end of December 2017;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.t-online.de/-/83267644|title="Ehe für alle": 680 homosexuelle Paare haben geheiratet|website=www.t-online.de|date=21 February 2018 }}</ref> 181 in ], 100 in ] and 97 in ], while the remaining couples married in the 9 other ]. During these three months, same-sex marriages accounted for 18.4% of all marriages performed in Berlin. 168 same-sex marriages were performed in ] from October to December 2017, with most being conversions from registered partnerships.<ref name="baden"/> In ], 135 same-sex couples were married between October 2017 and February 2018, with all but 16 of these marriages being conversions from registered partnerships. In ], 46 same-sex couples had married by February 2018.<ref name="baden">{{Cite web|url=https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/bw/zwischenbilanz-ehe-fuer-alle-in-baden-wuerttemberg/-/id=1622/did=21232086/nid=1622/15z241l/index.html|title=Viele gleichgeschlechtliche Paare trauen sich}}</ref> | 680 same-sex couples married in ] from October to the end of December 2017;<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.t-online.de/-/83267644|title="Ehe für alle": 680 homosexuelle Paare haben geheiratet|website=www.t-online.de|date=21 February 2018 }}</ref> 181 in ], 100 in ] and 97 in ], while the remaining couples married in the 9 other ]. During these three months, same-sex marriages accounted for 18.4% of all marriages performed in Berlin. 168 same-sex marriages were performed in ] from October to December 2017, with most being conversions from registered partnerships.<ref name="baden"/> In ], 135 same-sex couples were married between October 2017 and February 2018, with all but 16 of these marriages being conversions from registered partnerships. In ], 46 same-sex couples had married by February 2018.<ref name="baden">{{Cite web|url=https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/bw/zwischenbilanz-ehe-fuer-alle-in-baden-wuerttemberg/-/id=1622/did=21232086/nid=1622/15z241l/index.html|title=Viele gleichgeschlechtliche Paare trauen sich|access-date=20 March 2018|archive-date=22 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180822215425/https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/bw/zwischenbilanz-ehe-fuer-alle-in-baden-wuerttemberg/-/id=1622/did=21232086/nid=1622/15z241l/index.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
By the end of March 2018, more than 1,000 same-sex marriages had taken place in Berlin (four boroughs did not publish their marriage statistics, leaving incomplete data), 900 in ], 644 in ], 477 in ], 216 in ], 192 in ], 180 in ] and 158 in ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=30898|title=Über 1.000 Ehe-Schließungen unter Schwulen und Lesben in Berlin|website=queer.de}}</ref> Most were conversions from partnerships. | By the end of March 2018, more than 1,000 same-sex marriages had taken place in Berlin (four boroughs did not publish their marriage statistics, leaving incomplete data), 900 in ], 644 in ], 477 in ], 216 in ], 192 in ], 180 in ] and 158 in ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=30898|title=Über 1.000 Ehe-Schließungen unter Schwulen und Lesben in Berlin|website=queer.de}}</ref> Most were conversions from registered partnerships. | ||
2,540 same-sex marriages were performed in Berlin between 1 October 2017 and 31 December 2018, constituting 16.2% of the total 15,660 marriages. Of these, 1,637 (64%) were between two men and 903 (36%) were between two women, while 1,551 (61%) were converted registered life partnerships.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bz-berlin.de/berlin/ehe-fuer-alle-tausende-gaben-sich-in-berlin-und-brandenburg-das-jawort|title=Ehe für alle - Tausende gaben sich in Berlin und Brandenburg das Jawort|work=B.Z. Berlin|date=5 July 2019|language=de}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.morgenpost.de/berlin/article226392553/Ehe-fuer-alle-in-Brandenburg-Ueber-900-Paare-verheiratet.html|title=Ehe für alle in Brandenburg: Über 900 Paare verheiratet|work=Berliner Morgenpost|date=5 July 2019|language=de|access-date=11 July 2019|archive-date=11 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711211524/https://www.morgenpost.de/berlin/article226392553/Ehe-fuer-alle-in-Brandenburg-Ueber-900-Paare-verheiratet.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> In ], 903 same-sex marriages were performed in the same time period, constituting 5.9% of the total 15,440 marriages. 481 (53%) were between two women and 422 (47%) were between two men, while 550 (61%) were converted registered partnerships.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=33999|title=Berlin: 16 Prozent der Eheschließungen gleichgeschechtlich|work=Queer.de|date=5 July 2019|language=de}}</ref> | |||
===Religious performance=== | ===Religious performance=== | ||
Same-sex marriage remains a controversial topic among Germany's largest religious organisations: the ] and the ]. The Catholic Church does not permit same-sex marriages in its places of worship, while most member churches of the Protestant Church allow their clergy to officiate at same-sex marriages. Some smaller religious denominations also permit same-sex marriages. The synod of the ] voted in November 2021 to bless and perform same-sex marriages in its churches, removing all distinctions between same-sex and opposite-sex partners in canon law and liturgical matters. It had already allowed for the blessing of same-sex registered partnerships since 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.alt-katholisch.de/alt-katholische-synode-beschliesst-gleichstellung-von-partnerschaftssegnung-und-ehe/|title=Alt-Katholische Synode beschließt Gleichstellung von Partnerschaftssegnung und Ehe|work=www.alt-katholische.de|language=de|date=13 November 2021}}</ref> In November 2022, the United Methodist Church in Germany voted to allow blessings of same-sex marriages.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/208877/29-11-2022/gewissen-kann-ein-veto-sein-deutsche-methodisten-fuer-segnung-homosexueller-paare|work=Evangelisch.de|title=Deutsche Methodisten für Segnung homosexueller Ehepaare|date=29 November 2022}}</ref> Some ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.juedische-allgemeine.de/politik/chuppa-auch-fu%CC%88r-homo-paare/|language=de|title=Chuppa auch für Homo-Paare?|work=Jüdische Allgemeine|date=1 June 2015}}</ref> and ] groups also perform same-sex marriages.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://buddhismus-aktuell.de/artikel/die-mutigen-schwestern-der-goldenen-orchidee-und-andere-buddhistische-pioniere-der-gleichgeschlechtlichen-ehe/|title=Die mutigen Schwestern der Goldenen Orchidee … und andere buddhistische Pioniere der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe|language=de|work=Buddhismus Aktuell|access-date=1 October 2024|first=Michael|last=Vermeulen}}</ref> | |||
The largest religious organisations in Germany are the ] and the ]. A 2016 survey from the ] showed that 30.5% of German citizens were Catholic, 29.6% were members of the Protestant Church and 32.4% had no religious affiliation. | |||
The ] has authorised blessings of same-sex registered partnerships since 2011. The couple may receive a "prayer of blessing", but this differs from the classical wedding blessing. Before this, a same-sex couple had received a blessing in ] in 2009.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nak-nrw.de/aktuelles/kurznotiert/111223_segensgebet-fuer-eingetragene-partnerschaften/ |title=Segensgebet für eingetragene Partnerschaften |date=December 23, 2011 |language=German |website=Neuapostolische Kirche Nordrhein-Westfalen |access-date=April 18, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426071225/http://www.nak-nrw.de/aktuelles/kurznotiert/111223_segensgebet-fuer-eingetragene-partnerschaften/ |archive-date=April 26, 2012}}</ref> | |||
====Protestant Church in Germany==== | |||
====Protestant Church==== | |||
The Protestant Church consists of twenty ], ] and ] ] regional churches, encompassing the vast majority of Germany's Protestants. All twenty churches allow their clergy to bless same-sex relationships. Several also perform same-sex marriages in their places of worship: the ] (2016), the ] (2016),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.badische-zeitung.de/suedwest-1/landeskirche-genehmigt-gleichgeschlechtliche-trauungen--121184022.html|title=Landeskirche genehmigt gleichgeschlechtliche Trauungen|website=Badische Zeitung|date=23 April 2016|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2016),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/queerspiegel/homo-ehe-in-der-kirche-trauung-fuer-alle-in-berlin-erlaubt/13416326.html|title=Trauung für alle in Berlin erlaubt|website=Der Tagesspiegel|date=9 April 2016|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2017), the ] (2018),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.kirche-bremen.de/aktuelles/meinungen-und-positionen/lebensformen/|title=Segnungen und Trauungen homosexueller Paare|website=kirche-bremen.de|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2018), the ] (2018), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2020) and the ] (2022).<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/193228/22-11-2021/kirche-braunschweig-beschliesst-trauung-fuer-alle|title= Kirche Braunschweig beschließt "Trauung für alle"|work=evangelisch.de|date=22 November 2021|language=de}}</ref> The ] allows same-sex marriages to be performed in its churches but only if the local municipality agrees. | The Protestant Church consists of twenty ], ] and ] ] regional churches, encompassing the vast majority of Germany's Protestants. All twenty churches allow their clergy to bless same-sex relationships. Several also perform same-sex marriages in their places of worship: the ] (2016), the ] (2016),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.badische-zeitung.de/suedwest-1/landeskirche-genehmigt-gleichgeschlechtliche-trauungen--121184022.html|title=Landeskirche genehmigt gleichgeschlechtliche Trauungen|website=Badische Zeitung|date=23 April 2016|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2016),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/queerspiegel/homo-ehe-in-der-kirche-trauung-fuer-alle-in-berlin-erlaubt/13416326.html|title=Trauung für alle in Berlin erlaubt|website=Der Tagesspiegel|date=9 April 2016|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2017), the ] (2018),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.kirche-bremen.de/aktuelles/meinungen-und-positionen/lebensformen/|title=Segnungen und Trauungen homosexueller Paare|website=kirche-bremen.de|language=de}}</ref> the ] (2018), the ] (2018), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2019), the ] (2020) and the ] (2022).<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/193228/22-11-2021/kirche-braunschweig-beschliesst-trauung-fuer-alle|title= Kirche Braunschweig beschließt "Trauung für alle"|work=evangelisch.de|date=22 November 2021|language=de}}</ref> The ] allows same-sex marriages to be performed in its churches but only if the local municipality agrees. | ||
On 14 August 2016, despite the lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriages, two men were married at ] in Berlin by two Protestant pastors, the first same-sex marriage performed in a German church.<ref>{{cite news |last=Pongratz-Lippitt |first=Christa |title=Same-sex couple married in German Protestant church, a first |url=https://www.ncronline.org/news/world/same-sex-couple-married-german-protestant-church-first |access-date=23 August 2016|work=National Catholic Reporter |date=16 August 2016}}</ref> Marriages of same-sex couples are entered into the official church register. Pastors are under no obligation to perform same-sex marriages if this would violate their personal beliefs.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/111225/20-11-2014/segnung-homosexueller-bunt-wie-ein-regenbogen|title=Segnung Homosexueller: Bunt wie ein Regenbogen|website=evangelisch.de|language=de|date=21 June 2021}}</ref> | On 14 August 2016, despite the lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriages, two men were married at ] in Berlin by two Protestant pastors, the first same-sex marriage performed in a German church.<ref>{{cite news |last=Pongratz-Lippitt |first=Christa |title=Same-sex couple married in German Protestant church, a first |url=https://www.ncronline.org/news/world/same-sex-couple-married-german-protestant-church-first |access-date=23 August 2016|work=National Catholic Reporter |date=16 August 2016}}</ref> Marriages of same-sex couples are entered into the official church register. Pastors are under no obligation to perform same-sex marriages if this would violate their personal beliefs.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/111225/20-11-2014/segnung-homosexueller-bunt-wie-ein-regenbogen|title=Segnung Homosexueller: Bunt wie ein Regenbogen|website=evangelisch.de|language=de|date=21 June 2021}}</ref> | ||
====Catholic Church |
====Catholic Church==== | ||
Although the Catholic Church officially opposes same-sex marriages, several Catholic priests have been secretly blessing same-sex relationships for years, notably in the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-tuesday-edition-1.6022063/german-priests-are-blessing-same-sex-unions-in-direct-defiance-of-a-vatican-order-1.6022276|title=German priests are blessing same-sex unions in direct defiance of a Vatican order|website=CBC News|date=11 May 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/148554/06-02-2018/inofiziell-segnen-katholische-pfarrer-immer-wieder-homosexuelle-paare?kamp=b-014|title=Inofiziell segnen katholische Pfarrer immer wieder homosexuelle Paare|date=6 February 2021|language=de}}</ref> Several bishops have expressed their support for the blessings of same-sex relationships, including bishops ], ], ], ] |
Although the Catholic Church officially opposes same-sex marriages, several Catholic priests have been secretly blessing same-sex relationships for years, notably in the ] where five same-sex couples received a blessing in ] in 2003.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/vorab/a-260660.html|title=Riskanter Segen für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare|newspaper=Der Spiegel|date=9 August 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-tuesday-edition-1.6022063/german-priests-are-blessing-same-sex-unions-in-direct-defiance-of-a-vatican-order-1.6022276|title=German priests are blessing same-sex unions in direct defiance of a Vatican order|website=CBC News|date=11 May 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/148554/06-02-2018/inofiziell-segnen-katholische-pfarrer-immer-wieder-homosexuelle-paare?kamp=b-014|title=Inofiziell segnen katholische Pfarrer immer wieder homosexuelle Paare|work=Evangelisch.de|date=6 February 2021|language=de}}</ref> In 2007, a same-sex couple also received a blessing in ] in the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fr-online.de/rhein-main/bischof-von-limburg-dekan-muss-gehen-wegen-schwulen-trauung,1472796,3427662.html |access-date=18 April 2021 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120801034749/http://www.fr-online.de/frankfurt_und_hessen/nachrichten/hessen/?em_cnt=1579558 |website=Frankfurter Rundschau |title=Dakan muß gehen wegen Trauung eines homosexuellen Paares |language=German |date=20 August 2008 |archive-date=1 August 2012}}</ref> In May 2015, the ] voted in favour of the blessing of same-sex unions.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.br.de/nachrichten/aktuelles/zdk-katholiken-tagung-102.html |website=Bayerischer Rundfunk |title=Segnung von Homo-Ehen gefordert |first=Christian |last=Wölfel |date=10 May 2015 |language=German |access-date=18 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160110012007/http://www.br.de/nachrichten/aktuelles/zdk-katholiken-tagung-102.html |archive-date=10 January 2016}}</ref> Several bishops have expressed their support for the blessings of same-sex relationships, including bishops ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/augsburger-bischof-bertram-meier-will-homosexuelle-segnen,SZs9kzk|title=Augsburger Bischof Bertram Meier will homosexuelle Ehepaare segnen|language=de|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210610022535/https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/augsburger-bischof-bertram-meier-will-homosexuelle-segnen,SZs9kzk|archive-date=10 June 2021|date=9 June 2021|work=BR.de}}</ref> In May 2021, in response to the ] reiterating a ban on blessing same-sex unions, some 120 priests decided to publicly defy the ban and bless several couples. Among them, Father Jan Korditschke decided to bless a member in his ] whose partner had recently passed away, stating "How can you not bless - sorry, I'm getting emotional - a person in mourning after a long-term relationship? Should I say you should be grateful you got rid of this sinful love?". A 2015 survey conducted by the ] and the ] showed that 70% of German Catholics supported church blessings for same-sex relationships.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57184533|title=Germany's quiet Catholic rebellion on gay blessings and women preachers|website=BBC News|date=24 May 2021}}</ref> | ||
In March 2023, the ] of the German Catholic Church voted in support of blessing same-sex |
In March 2023, the ] of the German Catholic Church voted in support of blessing same-sex couples. "Often same-sex couples and remarried divorcees have experienced exclusion and depreciation in our Church. The possibility of publicly placing their partnership under God's blessing does not make up for these experiences. However, it offers the Church the opportunity to show appreciation for the love and values that exist in these relationships and thus ask for forgiveness and make reconciliation possible."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/03/11/german-catholic-bishops-defy-vatican-over-same-sex-relationships/|title=German Catholic bishops defy Vatican and back blessing of same-sex relationships|work=PinkNews|date=11 March 2023|first=Sophie|last=Perry}}</ref> The move, which was approved by a vote of 176–14 with 12 abstentions by the Synodal Path, will take effect in 2026.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/german-synodal-way-backs-same-sex-blessings|title=German synodal way backs same-sex blessings|work=The Pillar|date=10 March 2023|first=Luke|last=Coppen}}</ref> Shortly following the vote, the dioceses of ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/213526/14-03-2023/nach-beschluss-auf-synodalem-weg-bistum-osnabrueck-erlaubt-segensfeiern-fuer-homo-paare|work=Evangelisch.de|title=Bistum Osnabrück erlaubt Segensfeiern für Homo-Paare|language=de|date=14 March 2023}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://neuesruhrwort.de/2023/03/22/overbeck-segnung-homosexueller-paare-im-bistum-essen-moeglich/|work=Neues Ruhrwort|title=Overbeck, Segnung homosexueller Paare im Bistum Essen möglich|language=de|date=22 March 2023}}</ref> and ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.katholisch.de/artikel/48339-brief-an-seelsorger-bischof-wiesemann-bittet-um-segensfeiern-fuer-alle|work=Katholisch.de|title=Brief an Seelsorger: Bischof Wiesemann bittet um Segensfeiern für alle|date=3 November 2023|language=de}}</ref> as well as the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.katholisch.de/artikel/46683-erzbischof-koch-segnung-homosexueller-paare-im-erzbistum-moeglich|title=Erzbischof Koch: Segnung homosexueller Paare im Erzbistum möglich|work=Katholisch.de|date=25 August 2023|language=de}}</ref> announced that their clergy could bless same-sex couples. | ||
In December 2023, the Holy See published '']'', a declaration allowing ] to ] couples who are not considered to be ], including the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Flynn |first=JD |date=2023-12-22 |title=Is the 'false narrative' narrative a false narrative? |url=https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/is-the-false-narrative-narrative |access-date=2023-12-23 |website=] |language=en|archive-date=23 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231223121603/https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/is-the-false-narrative-narrative |url-status=live }}</ref> The declaration was welcomed by several bishops. Bätzing said he was "grateful", "The declaration ''Fiducia supplicans'' addresses the issues that have become apparent in the recent past around the topics of requests for blessing and blessings from a pastoral perspective and in a theologically moderate and calm language. The declaration applies theological categories and terms in a responsible manner. It draws a clear line between unwavering fidelity to the teachings of the Church and the pastoral requirements of an ecclesial practice that wants to be close to people. A pastoral scope for action is described here, which illustrates responsible Church practice." ] ] said the declaration could "help us in the polarized debates on this issue", "As a Catholic Church, in the pastoral walk with these people we usually have a great deficit of understanding, and all too often almost no ability to communicate in the care of souls. Now the scope for a shared pastoral path is widening."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/fiducia-supplicans-whos-saying-what|title='Fiducia supplicans': Who's saying what?|work=The Pillar|first=Luke|last=Coppen|date=19 December 2023}}</ref> | |||
====Old Catholic Church in Germany==== | |||
The synod of the ] voted in November 2021 to bless and perform same-sex marriages in its churches, removing all distinctions between same-sex and opposite-sex partners in canon law and liturgical matters. The church had already allowed for the blessing of same-sex registered partnerships since 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.alt-katholisch.de/alt-katholische-synode-beschliesst-gleichstellung-von-partnerschaftssegnung-und-ehe/|title=Alt-Katholische Synode beschließt Gleichstellung von Partnerschaftssegnung und Ehe|work=www.alt-katholische.de|language=de|date=13 November 2021}}</ref> | |||
==Public opinion== | ==Public opinion== | ||
] calling on Chancellor Angela Merkel (often referred to by the moniker "]") to support the legalisation of same-sex marriage, July 2015]] | |||
] building in Berlin, 15 September 2017]] | |||
]]] | ]]] | ||
In December 2006, a poll conducted by ], seeking public attitudes on economic, political, and social issues for member states of the ], found that Germany ranked seventh supporting same-sex marriage with 52% popular support. German support for same-sex marriage was above the European Union average of 44%.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/14203 |title=Eight EU Countries Back Same-Sex Marriage |publisher=Angus-reid.com |access-date=2010-12-13 |url-status= |
In December 2006, a poll conducted by ], seeking public attitudes on economic, political, and social issues for member states of the ], found that Germany ranked seventh supporting same-sex marriage with 52% popular support. German support for same-sex marriage was above the European Union average of 44%.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/14203 |title=Eight EU Countries Back Same-Sex Marriage |publisher=Angus-reid.com |access-date=2010-12-13 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080905233521/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/14203 |archive-date=5 September 2008 }}</ref> | ||
In January 2013, a poll conducted by ] found that German support for same-sex marriage was 66%, with 24% opposed and 10% undecided. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 59%, with 31% opposed and 11% undecided.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/01/11/french-opposed-gay-adoption/|title=Same-Sex Marriage in Europe Poll 2013 |access-date=2013-01-11}}</ref> A survey conducted the following month by ] and '']'' magazine found that 74% of ] were supportive of same-sex marriage, with 23% against. Support was recorded to be strongest among Green and Social Democratic (SPD) voters, but even among voters of Chancellor Angela Merkel's governing Christian Democrats (CDU) almost two-thirds were in favour.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-gays-idUKBRE91Q0NT20130227|title=Most Germans support gay marriage, poll shows|publisher=Reuters|date=27 February 2013}}</ref> A May 2013 ] poll found that 67% of respondents were in favour of same-sex marriage and another 12% supported other forms of recognition for same-sex couples.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=12795|title=Same-Sex Marriage|date=7–21 May 2013|publisher=Ipsos|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314051755/http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=12795|archive-date=14 March 2016}}</ref> A poll conducted that same month by ] showed that 74% of Germans supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ifop.com/publication/enquete-sur-la-droitisation-des-opinions-publiques-europeennes/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201082402/http://www.ifop.com/media/poll/2255-1-study_file.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Enquête sur la droitisation des opinions publiques européennes|archive-date=1 February 2016|website=IFOP}}</ref> | In January 2013, a poll conducted by ] found that German support for same-sex marriage was 66%, with 24% opposed and 10% undecided. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 59%, with 31% opposed and 11% undecided.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/01/11/french-opposed-gay-adoption/|title=Same-Sex Marriage in Europe Poll 2013 |access-date=2013-01-11}}</ref> A survey conducted the following month by ] and '']'' magazine found that 74% of ] were supportive of same-sex marriage, with 23% against. Support was recorded to be strongest among Green and Social Democratic (SPD) voters, but even among voters of Chancellor Angela Merkel's governing Christian Democrats (CDU) almost two-thirds were in favour.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-gays-idUKBRE91Q0NT20130227|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305142129/http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-gays-idUKBRE91Q0NT20130227|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 March 2016|title=Most Germans support gay marriage, poll shows|publisher=Reuters|date=27 February 2013}}</ref> A May 2013 ] poll found that 67% of respondents were in favour of same-sex marriage and another 12% supported other forms of recognition for same-sex couples.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=12795|title=Same-Sex Marriage|date=7–21 May 2013|publisher=Ipsos|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314051755/http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=12795|archive-date=14 March 2016}}</ref> A poll conducted that same month by ] showed that 74% of Germans supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ifop.com/publication/enquete-sur-la-droitisation-des-opinions-publiques-europeennes/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201082402/http://www.ifop.com/media/poll/2255-1-study_file.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Enquête sur la droitisation des opinions publiques européennes|archive-date=1 February 2016|website=IFOP}}</ref> | ||
According to an October 2013 poll by TNS Emnid, 70% supported full legal equality of registered partnerships and marriage.<ref>TNS Emnid poll on 15–16 October 2013, 1010 respondents</ref> | According to an October 2013 poll by TNS Emnid, 70% supported full legal equality of registered partnerships and marriage.<ref>TNS Emnid poll on 15–16 October 2013, 1010 respondents</ref> | ||
Line 197: | Line 853: | ||
According to a May 2015 poll by YouGov, 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 57% of CDU/CSU voters, 79% of SPD voters, 68% of The Left voters and 94% of Green voters), while 28% opposed allowing same-sex couples to marry and 7% were undecided. Support rose to 75% among 18–24-year-olds, but fell to 60% among those aged 55 and over. By religion, support was 64% among Catholics and 63% among Protestants. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 57%, with 35% opposed and 8% undecided.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://yougov.de/news/2015/05/29/mehrheit-der-deutschen-fur-ehe-fur-alle/|title=Mehrheit der Deutschen für Homo-Ehe|website=YouGov: What the world thinks}}</ref> The 2015 ] found that 66% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 29% were opposed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160122075042/http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Special Eurobarometer 437|archive-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> | According to a May 2015 poll by YouGov, 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 57% of CDU/CSU voters, 79% of SPD voters, 68% of The Left voters and 94% of Green voters), while 28% opposed allowing same-sex couples to marry and 7% were undecided. Support rose to 75% among 18–24-year-olds, but fell to 60% among those aged 55 and over. By religion, support was 64% among Catholics and 63% among Protestants. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 57%, with 35% opposed and 8% undecided.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://yougov.de/news/2015/05/29/mehrheit-der-deutschen-fur-ehe-fur-alle/|title=Mehrheit der Deutschen für Homo-Ehe|website=YouGov: What the world thinks}}</ref> The 2015 ] found that 66% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 29% were opposed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160122075042/http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Special Eurobarometer 437|archive-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> | ||
A May 2015 poll by TNS Emnid found that 64% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 63% of CDU/CSU voters, 77% of SPD voters, 63% of FDP voters, 62% of The Left voters, 89% of Green voters and 14% of AfD voters), while 31% were opposed and 5% were undecided.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/queerspiegel/streit-um-die-homo-ehe-demo-bischof-umfrage-alle-wollen-ehe-fuer-alle/11848616.html|title=Demo, Bischof, Umfrage: Alle wollen Ehe für alle|newspaper=Der Tagesspiegel Online}}</ref> A poll conducted the following month by ] showed that 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 58% of CDU/CSU voters, 75% of SPD voters, 72% of The Left voters, 79% of Green voters, 65% of FDP voters, and 42% of AfD voters).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/gleichgeschlechtliche-ehe/zwei-drittel-zustimmung-41200600.bild.html|title=BILD-Umfrage: Zwei Drittel der Deutschen sind für die "Homo-Ehe"|website=bild.de}}</ref> A September–October 2016 survey by the ] found that 82% of 18–21-year-olds supported same-sex marriage in Germany.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4487/global-young-people-report-single-pages-new.pdf|title=What The World's Young People Think And Feel|work=Varkey Foundation|date=January 2017|last1=Broadbent|first1=Emma|last2=Gougoulis|first2=John|last3=Lui|first3=Nicole|last4=Pota|first4=Vikas|first5=Jonathan|last5=Simons|access-date=14 April 2021|archive-date=20 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820230036/https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4487/global-young-people-report-single-pages-new.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | A May 2015 poll by TNS Emnid found that 64% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 63% of CDU/CSU voters, 77% of SPD voters, 63% of FDP voters, 62% of The Left voters, 89% of Green voters and 14% of AfD voters), while 31% were opposed and 5% were undecided.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/queerspiegel/streit-um-die-homo-ehe-demo-bischof-umfrage-alle-wollen-ehe-fuer-alle/11848616.html|title=Demo, Bischof, Umfrage: Alle wollen Ehe für alle|newspaper=Der Tagesspiegel Online}}</ref> A poll conducted the following month by ] showed that 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 58% of CDU/CSU voters, 75% of SPD voters, 72% of The Left voters, 79% of Green voters, 65% of FDP voters, and 42% of AfD voters).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/gleichgeschlechtliche-ehe/zwei-drittel-zustimmung-41200600.bild.html|title=BILD-Umfrage: Zwei Drittel der Deutschen sind für die "Homo-Ehe"|website=bild.de|date=2 June 2015 }}</ref> A September–October 2016 survey by the ] found that 82% of 18–21-year-olds supported same-sex marriage in Germany.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4487/global-young-people-report-single-pages-new.pdf|title=What The World's Young People Think And Feel|work=Varkey Foundation|date=January 2017|last1=Broadbent|first1=Emma|last2=Gougoulis|first2=John|last3=Lui|first3=Nicole|last4=Pota|first4=Vikas|first5=Jonathan|last5=Simons|access-date=14 April 2021|archive-date=20 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190820230036/https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4487/global-young-people-report-single-pages-new.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
In January 2017, a study by Germany's Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency indicated that 83% of Germans were in favour of same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germans-not-opposed-to-same-sex-marriage/a-37110913|title=Germans not opposed to same sex marriage|website=]|date=12 January 2017}}</ref> A June 2017 poll found that 73% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, including 95% of Green voters, 82% of SPD voters, 81% of The Left voters, 64% of CDU/CSU voters, 63% of FDP voters, and 55% of AfD voters.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/heute-in-deutschland/politbarometer-mehrheit-fuer-home-ehe-100.html|title=Politbarometer: Deutliche Mehrheit für die Homo-Ehe}}</ref> A ] poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 75% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, 23% were opposed and 2% did not know or refused to answer.<ref>, ''Pew Research Center'', 29 May 2018</ref> When divided by religion, 86% of religiously unaffiliated people, 82% of non-practicing Christians and 53% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage.<ref>, ''Pew Research Center'', 29 May 2018</ref> Opposition was 15% among 18–34-year-olds.<ref>, ], 2017</ref> | In January 2017, a study by Germany's Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency indicated that 83% of Germans were in favour of same-sex marriage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.com/en/germans-not-opposed-to-same-sex-marriage/a-37110913|title=Germans not opposed to same sex marriage|website=]|date=12 January 2017}}</ref> A June 2017 ] poll found that 73% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, including 95% of Green voters, 82% of SPD voters, 81% of The Left voters, 64% of CDU/CSU voters, 63% of FDP voters, and 55% of AfD voters.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/heute-in-deutschland/politbarometer-mehrheit-fuer-home-ehe-100.html|title=Politbarometer: Deutliche Mehrheit für die Homo-Ehe|date=23 June 2017|work=ZDF|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623142645/https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/heute-in-deutschland/politbarometer-mehrheit-fuer-home-ehe-100.html|archive-date=23 June 2017}}</ref> A ] poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 75% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, 23% were opposed and 2% did not know or had refused to answer.<ref>, ''Pew Research Center'', 29 May 2018</ref> When divided by religion, 86% of religiously unaffiliated people, 82% of non-practicing Christians and 53% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage.<ref>, ''Pew Research Center'', 29 May 2018</ref> Opposition was 15% among 18–34-year-olds.<ref>, ], 2017</ref> | ||
The 2019 Eurobarometer found that 84% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 12% were opposed.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/87771|title=Eurobarometer on Discrimination 2019: The social acceptance of LGBTI people in the EU|publisher=European Commission|work=TNS|access-date=23 September 2019|page=2}}</ref> A Pew Research Center poll conducted between February and May 2023 showed that 80% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, |
The 2019 Eurobarometer found that 84% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 12% were opposed.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/87771|title=Eurobarometer on Discrimination 2019: The social acceptance of LGBTI people in the EU|publisher=European Commission|work=TNS|access-date=23 September 2019|page=2}}</ref> A Pew Research Center poll conducted between February and May 2023 showed that 80% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, 18% were opposed and 2% did not know or had refused to answer. When divided by political affiliation, support was highest among those on the left of the political spectrum at 86%, followed by those at the center at 80% and those on the right at 74%. Women (85%) were also more likely to support same-sex marriage than men (74%).<ref name="pew">{{cite web|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/13/how-people-in-24-countries-view-same-sex-marriage/|title=How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage|work=Pew Research Center|date=13 June 2023}}</ref> The 2023 Eurobarometer showed that support was similar, at 84%, while 13% were opposed. The survey also found that 84% of Germans thought that "there is nothing wrong in a sexual relationship between two persons of the same sex", while 13% disagreed.<ref name="euro">{{cite web|url=https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2972|title=Eurobarometer 2023: Discrimination in the European Union|access-date=1 January 2024|work=europa.eu}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 216: | Line 872: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* |
* {{cite web|url=https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_lpartg/index.html|title=Act on Registered Life Partnerships|work=Gesetze im Internet|archive-date=27 September 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927231517/https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_lpartg/index.html|year=2022}} | ||
* |
* {{cite web|url=https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/DE/Eheoeffnung_BegleitG.html|title=Gesetz zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts|work=]|language=de|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181208130916/https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/DE/Eheoeffnung_BegleitG.html|archive-date=8 December 2018|trans-title=Law introducing the right to marry for persons of the same sex}} | ||
{{LGBT in Germany}} | {{LGBT in Germany}} | ||
{{Europe in topic|Same-sex marriage in}} | {{Europe in topic|Same-sex marriage in}} | ||
{{Status of same-sex unions}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 02:28, 31 December 2024
Part of the LGBTQ rights series | ||
Legal status of same-sex unions | ||
---|---|---|
Marriage
Recognized
|
||
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
|
||
Minimal recognition
|
||
See also
|
||
Notes
|
||
LGBTQ portal | ||
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Germany since 1 October 2017. A bill for the legalisation of same-sex marriage passed the Bundestag on 30 June 2017 and the Bundesrat on 7 July. It was signed into law on 20 July by President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and published in the Federal Law Gazette on 28 July 2017. Previously, the governing CDU/CSU had refused to legislate on the issue of same-sex marriage. In June 2017, Chancellor Angela Merkel unexpectedly said she hoped the matter would be put to a conscience vote. Consequently, other party leaders organised for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess. The Bundestag passed the legislation on 30 June by 393 votes to 226, and it went into force on 1 October. Polling suggests that a significant majority of Germans support the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. Germany was the first country in Central Europe, the fourteenth in Europe, and the 22nd in the world to allow same-sex couples to marry nationwide.
From 2001 until 2017, Germany recognized registered life partnerships for same-sex couples. The benefits granted by these partnerships were gradually extended by the Federal Constitutional Court throughout several rulings until they provided for most, but not all, of the rights of marriage.
Registered life partnerships
First and second Schröder governments
The Act on Registered Life Partnerships (German: Gesetz über die Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft) was a compromise between proponents of same-sex marriage and conservatives from the two major conservative parties, whose MPs' interpretation of marriage excluded gay people. The act established registered life partnerships (German: eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft, pronounced [ˈaɪ̯nɡəˌtʁaːɡənə ˈleːbm̩sˌpaʁtnɐʃaft]) granting same-sex couples a number of rights enjoyed by married opposite-sex couples. It was drafted by Volker Beck of the Greens and was approved under the First Schröder Cabinet, a coalition government constiting of the Greens and the Social Democratic Party (SPD). The Bundestag approved it in November 2000 with the government parties voting in favour and the opposition CDU/CSU and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) voting against. President Johannes Rau signed the law on 16 February 2001 and it entered into force on 1 August 2001.
On 17 July 2002, the Federal Constitutional Court upheld the act as constitutional. The court found, unanimously, that the process leading to the law's enactment was constitutional. The 8-member court further ruled, with three dissenting votes, that the substance of the law conforms to the Basic Law (Grundgesetz, the German Constitution), and ruled that these partnerships could be granted equal rights to those given to married couples. The initial law had deliberately withheld certain privileges, such as joint adoption and pension rights for widows and widowers, in an effort to observe the "special protection" which the Constitution provides for marriage and the family. The court determined that the "specialness" of the protection was not in the quantity of protection, but in the obligatory nature of this protection, whereas the protection of registered partnerships was at the Bundestag's discretion.
On 12 October 2004, the Registered Life Partnership Law (Revision) Act (German: Gesetz zur Überarbeitung des Lebenspartnerschaftsrechts) was passed by the Bundestag, increasing the rights of registered life partners to include, among others, the possibility of stepchild adoption and simpler alimony and divorce rules, but excluding the same tax benefits as in a marriage. The law took effect on 1 January 2005.
First Merkel Government
In July 2008, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that a transgender person who transitioned to female, after having been married to a woman for more than 50 years, could remain married to her wife and change her legal gender to female. It gave the Bundestag one year to effect the necessary change in the relevant law.
On 22 October 2009, the Constitutional Court ruled that a man whose employer had given him and his registered partner inferior pension benefits on account of him not being married was entitled to the same benefits he would receive were he and his partner married and of opposite sexes. The court's decision mandated equal rights for same-sex registered couples not just in regard to pension benefits, but in regard to all rights and responsibilities applying to married couples.
Second Merkel Government
On 25 October 2009, the new CDU/CSU-FDP coalition released its government programme. It stipulated that the tax inequality between same-sex life partners and opposite-sex married couples would be repealed and the Constitutional Court's ruling of 22 October would be codified into law. However, the government programme did not mention adoption rights.
On 17 August 2010, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that surviving registered partners are entitled to the same inheritance tax rules as surviving spouses. Previously, surviving marital partners paid 7–30% inheritance tax while surviving registered partners paid 17–50%.
On 18 February 2013, the Constitutional Court broadened adoption rights for registered partners. The court ruled that a partner must be allowed to adopt the other partner's adopted child, a so-called "successive adoption", and not only a partner's biological child. However, the government did not bring up a vote in Parliament to change the adoption laws before it adjourned in June 2013. The court gave the Bundestag until 30 June 2014 to change the laws. On 6 June 2013, the Constitutional Court ruled that registered partners should have joint tax filing benefits equal to those of married opposite-sex couples. The Bundestag had to change the law retroactively.
Third Merkel Government
While the new CDU/CSU-SPD government had to allow successive adoption by June 2014 as required by the 2013 Constitutional Court ruling, the court was expected to rule in 2014 whether registered partners should be allowed to jointly adopt children as well, but dismissed the case in February 2014 on procedural grounds. In March 2014, the coalition government approved a bill to allow successive adoption, with discussion on whether or not to implement full adoption equality. The Bundesrat recommended full adoption equality, and a Bundestag committee held a hearing on the topic. On 22 May, the Bundestag passed the law while rejecting proposals by the Greens for full adoption equality. Another law to grant same-sex couples full tax equality passed unanimously in the Bundestag, finishing the required legal changes following the June 2013 court ruling.
In October 2015, the Bundestag approved a government bill modifying a series of laws concerning registered partnerships. It gave registered partners the same rights as married couples in several legal areas; there were, however, no noteworthy changes. The bill passed the Bundesrat in November 2015.
The ability to enter into a registered life partnership was closed off on 1 October 2017. No further partnerships are granted in Germany, and couples may retain their status as registered partners or convert their union into a recognized marriage.
Partnership statistics
The registered partnership law went into effect on 1 August 2001. By October 2004, 5,000 same-sex couples had registered.
In 2007, there were 15,000 registered couples, two-thirds being male, and in 2010 there were 23,000 couples. In May 2011, 68,268 people reported being in a registered life partnership. As of the end of 2016, 44,000 registered partnerships had been conducted in Germany; approximately 25,000 (56.8%) were between men, while 19,000 were between women (43.2%).
Same-sex marriage
CDU/CSU, the senior member parties of Germany's coalition governments between 2005 and 2021, were historically opposed to the legalisation of same-sex marriage. The Greens, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Left Party support same-sex marriage and voted in June 2012 for a defeated bill to legalise it. The Free Democratic Party (FDP) supports same-sex marriage, though it rejected legislation when they were part of a coalition government with the CDU/CSU between 2009 and 2013. The SPD agreed to oppose same-sex marriage when in government with the CDU/CSU between 2013 and 2017. Most parties made agreement on same-sex marriage a condition for joining a coalition government with the CDU/CSU after the 2017 federal election. Since legalization in October 2017, the CDU/CSU has opposed motions to repeal the same-sex marriage law, and mostly considers the matter "settled". In 2020, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) published a political video supporting same-sex marriage and families, and in 2023 the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU) adopted a party platform supporting same-sex marriage. As of 2023, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains the largest party opposed to same-sex marriage.
In German, same-sex marriage is known as gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe (pronounced [ˈɡlaɪ̯çɡəˌʃlɛçtlɪçə ˈeːə]) or more commonly in public discourse as Ehe für alle (pronounced [ˈeːə fyːɐ̯ ˈʔalə]), meaning "marriage for all".
Second Merkel Government
The opposition Greens released a draft same-sex marriage law in June 2009. In March 2010, the Senate of Berlin announced its intention to introduce a same-sex marriage bill in the Bundesrat, the federal representation of the German states. According to the Senate, this law would best fit the Constitutional Court's ruling that same-sex couples must be treated equally to heterosexual couples. The Bundesrat rejected the law in September 2010. Only Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen and North Rhine-Westphalia voted in favour of the same-sex marriage bill; the other 12 states did not. In June 2011, the Senate of Hamburg, following CDU losses in state elections around the country, also announced its intention to introduce a same-sex marriage bill in the Bundesrat.
On 28 June 2012, a Greens motion to legalise same-sex marriage was defeated in the Bundestag by a vote of 309 to 260 with 12 abstentions. The motion was meant to give parity to same-sex couples in adoption and tax purposes. CDU/CSU and FDP members voted against the proposal, while the opposition parties (Social Democratic Party, Greens, and The Left) supported it.
On 22 March 2013, the Bundesrat passed a bill proposed by 5 states (Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate and Schleswig-Holstein) to open marriage to same-sex couples. The bill was sent to the Bundestag for a vote; however, the ruling coalition was still the same as in 2012 when the previous proposal was defeated.
Third Merkel Government
Developments in 2013–2017
Federal elections were held on 22 September 2013, after which a new government coalition was formed. The new Bundestag, inaugurated on 22 October, again consisted of a theoretical majority of parties in favour of same-sex marriage (SPD, The Left and the Greens). The Left immediately introduced a bill to legalise same-sex marriage, but the SPD did not support it in order to not jeopardise negotiations on government formation. Even though the SPD had campaigned on "100% equality" for LGBT people, the coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and the SPD did not contain any significant change regarding LGBT rights. The Left's bill had its first reading on 19 December 2013 and was subsequently sent to the Legal Affairs Committee for consideration.
On 5 June 2015, nine states (Baden-Württemberg, Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Schleswig-Holstein and Thuringia) submitted a same-sex marriage bill to the Bundesrat. The legislation had its first reading on 12 June 2015. In the Bundestag, the Greens submitted another bill on 10 June 2015. It had its first reading on 18 June. On 25 September 2015, the Bundesrat voted to approve the bill proposed by the nine states. The bill moved to the Bundestag where the governing parties (CDU/CSU and SPD) blocked the consideration of all three pending same-sex marriage bills.
In March 2017, the SPD, the junior partner in the coalition government, announced they would press the CDU to legalise same-sex marriage in the face of overwhelming public support. The leader of the SPD in the Bundestag, Thomas Oppermann, said his party would introduce a bill, in addition to the long-pending bills of the Greens, The Left and the one referred from the Bundesrat, but eventually did not do so. On 20 June 2017, the Federal Constitutional Court rejected an application by the Greens for an injunction ordering the Legal Affairs Committee to send bills legalising same-sex marriage to lawmakers for a vote in Parliament's last pre-election session. On 17 June 2017, the Greens pledged not to participate in any governing coalition after the 2017 elections unless the legalisation of same-sex marriage was part of the agreement. On 24 June, FDP Leader Christian Lindner said that he would recommend that his party make a similar commitment, and the following day the SPD made a similar pledge.
Bundestag vote and approval
In late June 2017, whilst answering audience questions at a public forum in Berlin, Chancellor Angela Merkel unexpectedly stated that she hoped the question of same-sex marriage would be put to a conscience vote. This was widely interpreted to mean that she would allow a vote in the Bundestag on the matter without party whip control by the Union parties. Shortly after her statement, several politicians, including SPD Leader Martin Schulz, pressured for a vote to be held in the last week of June during the final legislative session before summer recess. On 27 June, both Union parties (CDU and CSU) announced that they would allow their lawmakers a conscience vote, although they opposed a vote being held before the federal election. The SPD de facto breached the coalition agreement and planned on voting with the opposition parties to legalise same-sex marriage. On 28 June, SPD, Green, and Left members of the Legal Affairs Committee voted to schedule a plenary vote on the bill proposed by the Bundesrat in 2015, outvoting CDU/CSU members. The Greens and The Left withdrew their own respective bills.
On 30 June, the Bundestag debated and passed the bill by 393–226 with 4 abstentions and 7 absentees. Merkel herself, whose change of position had led to the vote being held, voted against the legislation, but said she hoped the result "not only promotes respect between the different opinions but also brings more social cohesion and peace". On 7 July, the Bundesrat approved the bill without a vote because there were no requests for changes. The bill was signed into law on 20 July 2017 by President Frank-Walter Steinmeier. It was published on 28 July in the Bundesgesetzblatt and came into force the first day of the third month after publication (i.e. 1 October 2017). Hundreds of same-sex couples were married all over Germany that day, with the first same-sex wedding taking place in Schöneberg, Berlin between Karl Kreile and Bodo Mende.
The same-sex marriage law was short; it added the following sentence to Article 1353 of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch: Marriage may be entered into for life by two persons of different sex or of the same sex.
Reaction and aftermath
Several legal experts, including MPs and party leaders, raised doubts about the legality of the law, with former President of the Federal Constitutional Court Hans-Jürgen Papier arguing that same-sex marriage is inconsistent with previous definitions of marriage espoused by the court. Article 6(1) of the Constitution places "marriage and family" under the "special protection of the state order". An amendment to the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Parliament. These concerns were dismissed by Federal Justice Minister Heiko Maas, who argued that Article 6(1) neither defines the term "marriage" nor rules out a wider definition.
Following the passage of the law, the Bavarian Government and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party both said they would consider petitioning the court for a judicial review (abstrakte Normenkontrolle). However, the AfD lacked legal standing to bring a challenge, as it was not part of the federal government nor any state government. It also did not have any representation in the Bundestag at the time, and did not reach the necessary quarter of Bundestag members in the 2017 election. On 6 March 2018, the Bavarian Government announced it would not challenge the law, after commissioned assessments found its chances to be successful as low.
In September 2018, nearly a year after legalization, the AfD introduced a motion to the Bundestag to abolish same-sex marriage. The measure was rejected on 11 October, with every other political party opposing the motion. Several Green and CDU/CSU lawmakers instead congratulated the thousands of same-sex couples who had married in Germany in the past year, while other MPs criticised the AfD for their proposal, calling it "undemocratic", "wrong", "a cheap political trick at the expense of free society" or even "lazy as hell". In June 2019, the AfD re-introduced a motion to repeal the same-sex marriage law in both the Legal Affairs Committee and the Family Committee. The proposal was rejected by every other political party. The CDU/CSU stated that "the constitutional concept of marriage is open to same-sex couples". The Social Democrats criticized the AfD for trying to "reopen a completed constitutional debate", while the FDP criticized that a renewed marriage ban for same-sex couples would "reduce their freedom". The Left considered the AfD draft to be a "deliberate provocation aimed at denying equal rights to sexual minorities", and the Greens pointed out that there is "broad political and social majority" support for same-sex marriage. That same month, the AfD presented a motion to the Landtag of Schleswig-Holstein to force the state government to challenge the same-sex marriage law at the Federal Constitutional Court. The motion was unsuccessful and opposed by every other political party in the Landtag.
In December 2018, the German Parliament passed legislation amending several laws to reflect the legalisation of same-sex marriage, including with regard to the recognition of foreign same-sex marriages and the conversions of registered life partnerships to marriages.
Marriage statistics
According to the Federal Statistical Office of Germany, up to 84,000 same-sex marriages had taken place in Germany by the end of 2023, a large proportion being conversions from registered partnerships.
Year | Same-sex marriages | Opposite-sex marriages |
Total marriages | % same-sex | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Total | ||||
2017 | 6,080 | 5,067 | 11,147 | 92,209 | 103,356 | 12.1% |
2018 | 10,686 | 11,071 | 21,757 | 449,466 | 482,370 | 4.51% |
2019 | 6,815 | 7,206 | 14,021 | 416,324 | 430,345 | 3.37% |
2020 | 4,663 | 5,276 | 9,939 | 373,304 | 383,243 | 2.66% |
2021 | 4,068 | 4,642 | 8,710 | 349,075 | 357,785 | 2.43% |
2022 | 4,664 | 5,379 | 10,043 | 380,700 | 390,743 | 2.57% |
2023 | 4,319 | 4,909 | 9,226 | 351,766 | 360,992 | 2.55% |
680 same-sex couples married in Berlin from October to the end of December 2017; 181 in Tempelhof-Schöneberg, 100 in Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf and 97 in Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg, while the remaining couples married in the 9 other boroughs. During these three months, same-sex marriages accounted for 18.4% of all marriages performed in Berlin. 168 same-sex marriages were performed in Stuttgart from October to December 2017, with most being conversions from registered partnerships. In Mannheim, 135 same-sex couples were married between October 2017 and February 2018, with all but 16 of these marriages being conversions from registered partnerships. In Freiburg im Breisgau, 46 same-sex couples had married by February 2018.
By the end of March 2018, more than 1,000 same-sex marriages had taken place in Berlin (four boroughs did not publish their marriage statistics, leaving incomplete data), 900 in Hamburg, 644 in Cologne, 477 in Munich, 216 in Frankfurt, 192 in Düsseldorf, 180 in Dortmund and 158 in Hannover. Most were conversions from registered partnerships.
2,540 same-sex marriages were performed in Berlin between 1 October 2017 and 31 December 2018, constituting 16.2% of the total 15,660 marriages. Of these, 1,637 (64%) were between two men and 903 (36%) were between two women, while 1,551 (61%) were converted registered life partnerships. In Brandenburg, 903 same-sex marriages were performed in the same time period, constituting 5.9% of the total 15,440 marriages. 481 (53%) were between two women and 422 (47%) were between two men, while 550 (61%) were converted registered partnerships.
Religious performance
Same-sex marriage remains a controversial topic among Germany's largest religious organisations: the Protestant Church and the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church does not permit same-sex marriages in its places of worship, while most member churches of the Protestant Church allow their clergy to officiate at same-sex marriages. Some smaller religious denominations also permit same-sex marriages. The synod of the Catholic Diocese of the Old Catholics in Germany voted in November 2021 to bless and perform same-sex marriages in its churches, removing all distinctions between same-sex and opposite-sex partners in canon law and liturgical matters. It had already allowed for the blessing of same-sex registered partnerships since 2003. In November 2022, the United Methodist Church in Germany voted to allow blessings of same-sex marriages. Some Jewish, and Buddhist groups also perform same-sex marriages.
The New Apostolic Church has authorised blessings of same-sex registered partnerships since 2011. The couple may receive a "prayer of blessing", but this differs from the classical wedding blessing. Before this, a same-sex couple had received a blessing in Velbert in 2009.
Protestant Church
The Protestant Church consists of twenty Lutheran, Reformed and United Protestant regional churches, encompassing the vast majority of Germany's Protestants. All twenty churches allow their clergy to bless same-sex relationships. Several also perform same-sex marriages in their places of worship: the Evangelical Church in the Rhineland (2016), the Protestant Church in Baden (2016), the Evangelical Church in Berlin, Brandenburg and Silesian Upper Lusatia (2016), the Evangelical Reformed Church in Germany (2017), the Evangelical Church of Bremen (2018), the Evangelical Church of Hesse Electorate-Waldeck (2018), the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Oldenburg (2018), the Protestant Church in Hesse and Nassau (2019), the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Hanover (2019), the Evangelical Church of the Palatinate (2019), the Church of Lippe (2019), the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Northern Germany (2019), the Evangelical Church of Westphalia (2020) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Brunswick (2022). The Evangelical Church in Central Germany allows same-sex marriages to be performed in its churches but only if the local municipality agrees.
On 14 August 2016, despite the lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriages, two men were married at St. Mary's Church in Berlin by two Protestant pastors, the first same-sex marriage performed in a German church. Marriages of same-sex couples are entered into the official church register. Pastors are under no obligation to perform same-sex marriages if this would violate their personal beliefs.
Catholic Church
Although the Catholic Church officially opposes same-sex marriages, several Catholic priests have been secretly blessing same-sex relationships for years, notably in the Diocese of Aachen where five same-sex couples received a blessing in Mönchengladbach in 2003. In 2007, a same-sex couple also received a blessing in Wetzlar in the Diocese of Limburg. In May 2015, the Central Committee of German Catholics voted in favour of the blessing of same-sex unions. Several bishops have expressed their support for the blessings of same-sex relationships, including bishops Helmut Dieser, Franz-Josef Hermann Bode, Peter Kohlgraf, Georg Bätzing, Heinrich Timmerevers and Bertram Meier. In May 2021, in response to the Holy See reiterating a ban on blessing same-sex unions, some 120 priests decided to publicly defy the ban and bless several couples. Among them, Father Jan Korditschke decided to bless a member in his congregation whose partner had recently passed away, stating "How can you not bless - sorry, I'm getting emotional - a person in mourning after a long-term relationship? Should I say you should be grateful you got rid of this sinful love?". A 2015 survey conducted by the Free University of Berlin and the University of Münster showed that 70% of German Catholics supported church blessings for same-sex relationships.
In March 2023, the Synodal Path of the German Catholic Church voted in support of blessing same-sex couples. "Often same-sex couples and remarried divorcees have experienced exclusion and depreciation in our Church. The possibility of publicly placing their partnership under God's blessing does not make up for these experiences. However, it offers the Church the opportunity to show appreciation for the love and values that exist in these relationships and thus ask for forgiveness and make reconciliation possible." The move, which was approved by a vote of 176–14 with 12 abstentions by the Synodal Path, will take effect in 2026. Shortly following the vote, the dioceses of Osnabrück, Essen, and Speyer, as well as the Archdiocese of Berlin, announced that their clergy could bless same-sex couples.
In December 2023, the Holy See published Fiducia supplicans, a declaration allowing Catholic priests to bless couples who are not considered to be married according to church teaching, including the blessing of same-sex couples. The declaration was welcomed by several bishops. Bätzing said he was "grateful", "The declaration Fiducia supplicans addresses the issues that have become apparent in the recent past around the topics of requests for blessing and blessings from a pastoral perspective and in a theologically moderate and calm language. The declaration applies theological categories and terms in a responsible manner. It draws a clear line between unwavering fidelity to the teachings of the Church and the pastoral requirements of an ecclesial practice that wants to be close to people. A pastoral scope for action is described here, which illustrates responsible Church practice." Bishop of Passau Stefan Oster said the declaration could "help us in the polarized debates on this issue", "As a Catholic Church, in the pastoral walk with these people we usually have a great deficit of understanding, and all too often almost no ability to communicate in the care of souls. Now the scope for a shared pastoral path is widening."
Public opinion
In December 2006, a poll conducted by Angus-Reid Global Monitor, seeking public attitudes on economic, political, and social issues for member states of the European Union, found that Germany ranked seventh supporting same-sex marriage with 52% popular support. German support for same-sex marriage was above the European Union average of 44%.
In January 2013, a poll conducted by YouGov found that German support for same-sex marriage was 66%, with 24% opposed and 10% undecided. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 59%, with 31% opposed and 11% undecided. A survey conducted the following month by RTL Television and Stern magazine found that 74% of Germans were supportive of same-sex marriage, with 23% against. Support was recorded to be strongest among Green and Social Democratic (SPD) voters, but even among voters of Chancellor Angela Merkel's governing Christian Democrats (CDU) almost two-thirds were in favour. A May 2013 Ipsos poll found that 67% of respondents were in favour of same-sex marriage and another 12% supported other forms of recognition for same-sex couples. A poll conducted that same month by Ifop showed that 74% of Germans supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.
According to an October 2013 poll by TNS Emnid, 70% supported full legal equality of registered partnerships and marriage.
According to a May 2015 poll by YouGov, 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 57% of CDU/CSU voters, 79% of SPD voters, 68% of The Left voters and 94% of Green voters), while 28% opposed allowing same-sex couples to marry and 7% were undecided. Support rose to 75% among 18–24-year-olds, but fell to 60% among those aged 55 and over. By religion, support was 64% among Catholics and 63% among Protestants. Support for adoption by same-sex couples was 57%, with 35% opposed and 8% undecided. The 2015 Eurobarometer found that 66% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 29% were opposed.
A May 2015 poll by TNS Emnid found that 64% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 63% of CDU/CSU voters, 77% of SPD voters, 63% of FDP voters, 62% of The Left voters, 89% of Green voters and 14% of AfD voters), while 31% were opposed and 5% were undecided. A poll conducted the following month by INSA showed that 65% of Germans supported same-sex marriage (by party: 58% of CDU/CSU voters, 75% of SPD voters, 72% of The Left voters, 79% of Green voters, 65% of FDP voters, and 42% of AfD voters). A September–October 2016 survey by the Varkey Foundation found that 82% of 18–21-year-olds supported same-sex marriage in Germany.
In January 2017, a study by Germany's Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency indicated that 83% of Germans were in favour of same-sex marriage. A June 2017 ZDF poll found that 73% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, including 95% of Green voters, 82% of SPD voters, 81% of The Left voters, 64% of CDU/CSU voters, 63% of FDP voters, and 55% of AfD voters. A Pew Research Center poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 75% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, 23% were opposed and 2% did not know or had refused to answer. When divided by religion, 86% of religiously unaffiliated people, 82% of non-practicing Christians and 53% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage. Opposition was 15% among 18–34-year-olds.
The 2019 Eurobarometer found that 84% of Germans thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 12% were opposed. A Pew Research Center poll conducted between February and May 2023 showed that 80% of Germans supported same-sex marriage, 18% were opposed and 2% did not know or had refused to answer. When divided by political affiliation, support was highest among those on the left of the political spectrum at 86%, followed by those at the center at 80% and those on the right at 74%. Women (85%) were also more likely to support same-sex marriage than men (74%). The 2023 Eurobarometer showed that support was similar, at 84%, while 13% were opposed. The survey also found that 84% of Germans thought that "there is nothing wrong in a sexual relationship between two persons of the same sex", while 13% disagreed.
See also
- Marriage in Germany
- LGBT rights in Germany
- LGBT rights in the European Union
- Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Notes
- In Germany's minority languages:
- Bavarian: Lemspartnaschoft, pronounced [ˈleːmsˌb̥ɑːd̥nɐʃɔfd̥]
- Low German: Levenspartnerschop, pronounced [ˈlɛːm̩sˌpaɐ̯tnɐʃop]
- Danish: registreret partnerskab, pronounced [ʁekiˈstʁeˀð̩ ˈpʰɑːtnɐˌskɛˀp]
- Upper Sorbian: žiwjenske partnerstwo, pronounced [ˈʒiwʲɛnskɛ ˈpaʁtnɛʁstwɔ]
- Lower Sorbian: žywjeńske partnaŕstwo, pronounced [ˈʒɨvʲɛnʲskʲɛ ˈpartnarʲstwɔ]
- North Frisian: laawenspårtnerschap
- Saterland Frisian: Líeuwends-Partnerskup, pronounced [ˈliːu̯.ənts ˈpaɐ̯tnɐskʊp]
- Romani: civilno partneripe
- German: Die Ehe wird von zwei Personen verschiedenen oder gleichen Geschlechts auf Lebenszeit geschlossen.
- from October
References
- ^ "How people in 24 countries view same-sex marriage". Pew Research Center. 13 June 2023.
- ^ "Eurobarometer 2023: Discrimination in the European Union". europa.eu. Retrieved 1 January 2024.
- "Ofiso e registraciako". Stadt Bochum (in Romany). Retrieved 25 November 2024.
- "SASS Plattdeutsches Netzwörterbuch: Levenspartnerschop". netz.sass-platt.de. Retrieved 3 June 2024.
- Kirkeby, Bianca (1 October 2017). "Det første homoseksuelle par har giftet sig i Tyskland". Flensborg Avis (in Danish). Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- "Jenož 0.9 procentow? Spodźiwne přispomnjenje k spěchowanju Serbow w Sakskej". piwarc.wordpress.com (in Upper Sorbian). 16 March 2013.
- "Terminologija Wěcneje wědy". manualzz.com. 2011. Archived from the original on 27 January 2019.
- "Leitsätze zum Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 17. Juli 2002". Archived from the original on 28 September 2007.
- "Lifetime Partnership Act of Germany". Archived from the original on 15 March 2006. Retrieved 27 June 2006.
- "LPartRÜG Gesetz zur Überarbeitung des Lebenspartnerschaftsrechts". www.buzer.de.
- "Current Legal Framework: Transgender Issues in Germany". Archived from the original on 18 August 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
- "High court backs equal rights for gay marriages". Thelocal.de. 25 October 2009. Retrieved 13 December 2010.
- (in German) Verfassungsgericht zu Homo-Ehe - Ehe, Partner, Kinder
- "Wachstum Bildung Zusammenhalt" (PDF). CDU (in German). Retrieved 3 June 2024.
- "Die FDP hat ihre Wahlversprechungen gehalten!". Archived from the original on 28 October 2009.
- "German court: gay couples entitled to equal treatment on inheritance tax". The Canadian Press. Associated Press. 17 August 2010. Archived from the original on 20 August 2010. Retrieved 17 August 2010.
- "Court Ruling: Germany Strengthens Gay Adoption Rights". Spiegel. 19 February 2013.
- "Bundesverfassungsgericht - Entscheidungen - Nichtzulassung der Sukzessivadoption durch eingetragene Lebenspartner ist verfassungswidrig". www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de. 19 February 2013.
- "High Court Ruling: Germany Grants Tax Equality to Gay Couples". Spiegel. 6 June 2013.
- "Bundesrat beschließt Ehegattensplitting für Homo-Paare" (in German). Queer.de. 5 July 2013.
- "Sukzessivadoption: Maas erledigt Hausaufgaben von Schwarz-Gelb" (in German). Queer.de. 16 January 2014.
- "Karlsruhe: Vorerst kein Urteil zum Adoptionsrecht" (in German). Queer.de. 21 January 2014.
- "Bundesrat für volles Adoptionsrecht für Homo-Paare" (in German). Queer.de. 11 April 2014.
- "Bundestag: Öffentliche Anhörung zum Adoptionsrecht" (in German). Queer.de. 30 April 2014.
- "Homo-Paare erhalten Recht auf Sukzessivadoption". Die Welt (in German). 22 May 2014.
- "Weitere Gleichstellung im Steuerrecht" (in German). Queer.de. 7 May 2014.
- ""Bereinigungsgesetz": Bundesrat nickt Mini-Reform durch" (in German). Queer.de. 6 November 2015.
- "Das ändert sich für homosexuelle Paare" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- "Civil partnership". Archived from the original on 16 October 2016. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
- "68 000 gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften in Deutschland". Archived from the original on 18 July 2011.
- "Deutschlandweit rund 23 000 eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften".
- Bildung, Bundeszentrale für politische (20 November 2010). "Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften | bpb". bpb.de.
- "ZENSUS2011 - Homepage - 2011 Census: just under a quarter of foreigners originate from Turkey". www.zensus2011.de. Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
- "Destatis: Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaften – Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus und des Zensus".
- ^ "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts" (PDF).
- "Öffnung der Ehe für Lesben und Schwule". Archived from the original on 20 October 2011.
- "Bundestag stimmt für Beibehaltung der Diskriminierung" (in German). Queer.de. 28 June 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
- ^ "Germany: Merkel paves way for gay marriage vote". BBC News. 27 June 2017. Archived from the original on 27 June 2017.
- ^ Blech, Norbert. "Antrag gegen Ehe für alle: Bundestag nimmt AfD auseinander". queer.de.
- "75 Jahre CDU: CDU entdeckt die Ehe für alle für sich". Süddeutsche Zeitung Jetzt (in German). 27 June 2020.
- Stern, Henry (14 April 2023). "Ehe für alle, aber keine Gender-Sternchen: So will die CSU Bayern vereinen". Augsburger Allgemeine (in German).
- Stern, Henry (14 April 2023). "Nein zum Gendersternchen, Akzeptanz der "Ehe für alle": Schweinfurterin hat großen Anteil am neuen CSU-Grundsatzprogramm". Main Post (in German).
- "Berliner Senat für Öffnung der Ehe". queer.de.
- "Bundesrat lehnt Gleichstellung ab". queer.de.
- "Hamburg beschließt Bundesratsiniative für Ehe-Öffnung". queer.de.
- "Bundestag lehnt Entwurf für Homo-Ehen ab" [Federal Diet declines motion for gay marriages]. Rheinische Post (in German). 28 June 2012. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
- "Bundesrat stimmt für Ehe-Öffnung" (in German). Queer.de. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- "DIP21 Extrakt". dipbt.bundestag.de.
- "Bundestag: Linke beantragt Ehe-Öffnung" (in German). Queer.de. 9 October 2013.
- "Linksfraktion bringt Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe-Öffnung ein" (in German). Queer.de. 25 October 2013.
- "Große Koalition vertagt die Gleichstellung" (in German). Queer.de. 27 November 2013.
- "DIP21 Extrakt". dipbt.bundestag.de.
- "DIP21 Extrakt". dipbt.bundestag.de.
- "DIP21 Extrakt". dipbt.bundestag.de.
- "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Abschaffung des Eheverbots für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare" (PDF) (in German). Bundestag. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
- "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts". Bundesrat.
- "Bundesrat stimmt für Öffnung der Ehe für Schwule und Lesben" (in German). Queer.de. 25 September 2015.
- "Germany's Bundesrat passes equal marriage bill despite Merkel's opposition". Pink News. 26 September 2016. Archived from the original on 29 September 2015.
- "Ehe für alle: Koalition blockiert Abstimmung im Bundestag". Queer.de. 19 December 2015.
- Bleiker, Carla (6 March 2017). "Merkel's conservatives under pressure to allow gay marriage". dw.com. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
- "Oppermann: SPD-Gesetzentwurf zur Ehe für alle noch im März". Queer.de. 11 March 2017.
- "German Opposition Party Fails to Force Gay Marriage Vote". NBC News. Associated Press. 20 June 2017.
- "German Greens make same-sex marriage guarantee condition of coalition". Deutsche Welle. 17 June 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- Martin, Michelle; Busemann, Hans-Edzard (17 June 2017). "Germany's Greens open to almost all coalitions but price is gay marriage". Reuters. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Lindner will Ehe für alle zur Koalitionsbedingung machen" (in German). Die Zeit. 24 June 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "FDP soll "Ehe für alle" zur Koalitionsbedingung machen". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 24 June 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Bundesparteitag der SPD Schulz macht Ehe für alle zur Koalitionsbedingung". DPA (in German). Berliner Zeitung. 25 June 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Schulz: Ohne Homo-Ehe keine Koalition mit SPD". Saarbrücker Zeitung (in German). 25 June 2017. Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Is Angela Merkel about to shift her party's position on gay marriage?". Deutsche Welle. 27 June 2017.
- "Ehe für alle: SPD kündigt Bundestags-Abstimmung noch in dieser Woche an". queer.de (in German). 27 June 2017.
- "Bundestag vote on gay marriage expected in coming days". dw.com. 27 June 2017.
- "Merkel gibt Abstimmung über Ehe für alle frei". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). 27 June 2017.
- "Rechtsausschuss beschließt: Bundestag stimmt über 'Ehe für alle' ab" [Parliamentary committee decides: Bundestag shall vote on 'marriage for all']. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 28 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "German parliament paves way for gay marriage vote Friday". Agence-France Presse. Yahoo. 28 June 2017. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Gay Marriage Nears Legalization". Handelsblatt Global. 28 June 2017.
- "Gay marriage bill to be voted on Friday, despite government feud over timing". The Local Germany. 28 June 2017.
- "Bundestag entscheidet möglicherweise über die "Ehe für alle"" (in German). Bundestag. 28 June 2017. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- "Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts" (PDF) (in German). Bundestag. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- "Bundestag: Große Mehrheit stimmt für Ehe für alle" [Bundestag: large majority votes in favour of 'marriage for all']. Die Zeit (in German). 30 June 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- Smale, Alison; Shimer, David (30 June 2017). "Parliament in Germany Approves Same-Sex Marriage". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- "Germany's Bundestag passes bill on same-sex marriage". Deutsche Welle. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 1 July 2017.
- "German parliament votes to legalise same-sex marriage". The Guardian. 30 June 2017.
- "Why Angela Merkel, known for embracing liberal values, voted against same-sex marriage". Washington Post. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017.
- "German lawmakers approve same-sex marriage in landmark vote". Reuters. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 1 July 2017.
- "Länderkammer: Bundesrat stimmt Öffnung der Ehe zu". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 7 July 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- Arab, Adrian (6 July 2017). "Ehe für alle: Im Bundesrat ergibt sich die CSU kampflos" [Marriage for all: CSU gives up without a fight in the Bundesrat]. Die Welt (in German). Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- "Same-sex marriage bill clears German upper house". Deutsche Welle. 7 July 2017. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- Duffy, Nick (7 July 2017). "Germany's upper house gives green light to equal marriage". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- "Germany's first same-sex marriages expected in October". The Local. 21 July 2017. Archived from the original on 21 July 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- "German president signs gay marriage bill into law". Deutsche Welle. 21 July 2017. Archived from the original on 21 July 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- "Gesetz zur Ehe für alle unterzeichnet". Die Zeit. 21 July 2017. Archived from the original on 21 July 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- "Gesetz zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts" (PDF) (in German). Bundesgesetzblatt. 28 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "Ehe für alle gilt ab 1. Oktober" (in German). n-tv. 28 July 2017. Archived from the original on 28 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "Germany's first same-sex "I do"'s as marriage equality dawns". Reuters. 1 October 2017. Archived from the original on 1 October 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
- "Germany gay marriage: Couple are first to marry under new law". BBC News. 1 October 2017. Archived from the original on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
- Jordans, Frank (1 October 2017). "Germany celebrates 1st same-sex weddings after law change". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
- "Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB), § 1353 Eheliche Lebensgemeinschaft". www.gesetze-im-internet.de (in German). Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts, 30 June 2017, Bundestag
- "Ehe für alle: So haben die Abgeordneten abgestimmt – die Namensliste" (PDF). Abgeordnetenwatch (in German). 30 June 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
- "Ehe für alle - überall? (Das Abstimmungsverhalten der 630 Bundestagsabgeordneten)". Public Tableau (in German). 8 July 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
- "Hans-Jürgen Papier: Ex-Verfassungsrichter hält Ehe für alle für grundgesetzwidrig" [Hans-Jürgen Papier: former justice of the Constitutional Court considers 'marriage for all' unconstitutional]. Spiegel Online (in German). 2 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- "Germany Approves Gay Marriage: Next Stop Constitutional Court?". focus-fen.net. 2 July 2017. Archived from the original on 18 November 2018. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- ^ "Ehe für alle: Könnte eine Klage gegen die Ehe für alle erfolgreich sein?" [Marriage for all: could a constitutional complaint be successful?]. Die Zeit (in German). 2 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- "Ehe für alle: Kauder rechnet mit Verfassungsklage" [Marriage for all: Kauder expects constitutional complaint]. Die Zeit (in German). 1 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- "AfD will gegen Ehe für alle klagen". Der Spiegel (in German). 2 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- Kiiver, Philipp; Kornet, Nicole, eds. (2010). Selected National, European and International Provisions from Public and Private Law. Europa Law Publishing. p. 27.
- "Gleichstellung: Seehofer prüft Verfassungsklage gegen Ehe für alle". Die Zeit (in German). 4 July 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
- "Germany's AfD threatens law suit over gay marriage". Politico Europe. 2 July 2017.
- Hipp, Dietmar (3 July 2017). "Ehe für alle: Sie wollen klagen - aber sie können nicht" [Marriage for all: they want to sue, but they can't]. Spiegel Online (in German). Retrieved 4 July 2017.
- "Bericht aus der Kabinettssitzung vom 6. März 2018" (in German). Government of Bavaria. 6 March 2018. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- "Bayern klagt nicht gegen die Ehe für alle". Deutsche Presse-Agentur (in German). Die Welt. 6 March 2018. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Wareham, Jamie (8 March 2018). "German state drops gay marriage legal challenge as they have 'no chance of winning'". Gay Star News. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- Klein, Dennis (15 June 2018). "AfD will Eheverbot für Schwule und Lesben wieder einführen". Queer.de.
- "Bundestag: AfD bringt Antrag zur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle ein". Queer.de. 27 September 2018.
- "AfD-Vorstoś sur Abschaffung der Ehe für alle abgelehnt". Queer.de (in German). 9 July 2019.
- Klein, Dennis (14 September 2018). "AfD macht im Landtag Stimmung gegen die Ehe für alle". Queer.de.
- "AfD will Ehe für alle wieder abschaffen". The Huffington Post. 1 October 2018. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2018.
- "EheRAnpG Gesetz zur Umsetzung des Gesetzes zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen". www.buzer.de.
- ^ "Eheschließungen nach den Paarkonstellationen der Ehe". Statistiches Bundesamt (in German). Archived from the original on 17 October 2023.
- "Wie viele gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe gibt es in Deutschland?". Lesben- under Schwulenverband (in German).
- "Tausende schwule und lesbische Paare haben geheiratet". queer.de.
- One year of 'Marriage for all' in Germany: How many couples have tied the knot?, The Local.de, 28 September 2018
- Connor, Richard (5 July 2022). "Germany publishes data on first 5 years of same-sex marriage". Deutsche Welle.
- ""Ehe für alle": 680 homosexuelle Paare haben geheiratet". www.t-online.de. 21 February 2018.
- ^ "Viele gleichgeschlechtliche Paare trauen sich". Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
- "Über 1.000 Ehe-Schließungen unter Schwulen und Lesben in Berlin". queer.de.
- "Ehe für alle - Tausende gaben sich in Berlin und Brandenburg das Jawort". B.Z. Berlin (in German). 5 July 2019.
- "Ehe für alle in Brandenburg: Über 900 Paare verheiratet". Berliner Morgenpost (in German). 5 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2019.
- "Berlin: 16 Prozent der Eheschließungen gleichgeschechtlich". Queer.de (in German). 5 July 2019.
- "Alt-Katholische Synode beschließt Gleichstellung von Partnerschaftssegnung und Ehe". www.alt-katholische.de (in German). 13 November 2021.
- "Deutsche Methodisten für Segnung homosexueller Ehepaare". Evangelisch.de. 29 November 2022.
- "Chuppa auch für Homo-Paare?". Jüdische Allgemeine (in German). 1 June 2015.
- Vermeulen, Michael. "Die mutigen Schwestern der Goldenen Orchidee … und andere buddhistische Pioniere der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe". Buddhismus Aktuell (in German). Retrieved 1 October 2024.
- "Segensgebet für eingetragene Partnerschaften". Neuapostolische Kirche Nordrhein-Westfalen (in German). 23 December 2011. Archived from the original on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- "Landeskirche genehmigt gleichgeschlechtliche Trauungen". Badische Zeitung (in German). 23 April 2016.
- "Trauung für alle in Berlin erlaubt". Der Tagesspiegel (in German). 9 April 2016.
- "Segnungen und Trauungen homosexueller Paare". kirche-bremen.de (in German).
- "Kirche Braunschweig beschließt "Trauung für alle"". evangelisch.de (in German). 22 November 2021.
- Pongratz-Lippitt, Christa (16 August 2016). "Same-sex couple married in German Protestant church, a first". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 23 August 2016.
- "Segnung Homosexueller: Bunt wie ein Regenbogen". evangelisch.de (in German). 21 June 2021.
- "Riskanter Segen für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare". Der Spiegel. 9 August 2003.
- "German priests are blessing same-sex unions in direct defiance of a Vatican order". CBC News. 11 May 2021.
- "Inofiziell segnen katholische Pfarrer immer wieder homosexuelle Paare". Evangelisch.de (in German). 6 February 2021.
- "Dakan muß gehen wegen Trauung eines homosexuellen Paares". Frankfurter Rundschau (in German). 20 August 2008. Archived from the original on 1 August 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- Wölfel, Christian (10 May 2015). "Segnung von Homo-Ehen gefordert". Bayerischer Rundfunk (in German). Archived from the original on 10 January 2016. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- "Augsburger Bischof Bertram Meier will homosexuelle Ehepaare segnen". BR.de (in German). 9 June 2021. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021.
- "Germany's quiet Catholic rebellion on gay blessings and women preachers". BBC News. 24 May 2021.
- Perry, Sophie (11 March 2023). "German Catholic bishops defy Vatican and back blessing of same-sex relationships". PinkNews.
- Coppen, Luke (10 March 2023). "German synodal way backs same-sex blessings". The Pillar.
- "Bistum Osnabrück erlaubt Segensfeiern für Homo-Paare". Evangelisch.de (in German). 14 March 2023.
- "Overbeck, Segnung homosexueller Paare im Bistum Essen möglich". Neues Ruhrwort (in German). 22 March 2023.
- "Brief an Seelsorger: Bischof Wiesemann bittet um Segensfeiern für alle". Katholisch.de (in German). 3 November 2023.
- "Erzbischof Koch: Segnung homosexueller Paare im Erzbistum möglich". Katholisch.de (in German). 25 August 2023.
- Flynn, JD (22 December 2023). "Is the 'false narrative' narrative a false narrative?". The Pillar. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
- Coppen, Luke (19 December 2023). "'Fiducia supplicans': Who's saying what?". The Pillar.
- "Eight EU Countries Back Same-Sex Marriage". Angus-reid.com. Archived from the original on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 13 December 2010.
- "Same-Sex Marriage in Europe Poll 2013". Retrieved 11 January 2013.
- "Most Germans support gay marriage, poll shows". Reuters. 27 February 2013. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
- "Same-Sex Marriage". Ipsos. 7–21 May 2013. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016.
- "Enquête sur la droitisation des opinions publiques européennes" (PDF). IFOP. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016.
- TNS Emnid poll on 15–16 October 2013, 1010 respondents
- "Mehrheit der Deutschen für Homo-Ehe". YouGov: What the world thinks.
- "Special Eurobarometer 437" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 January 2016.
- "Demo, Bischof, Umfrage: Alle wollen Ehe für alle". Der Tagesspiegel Online.
- "BILD-Umfrage: Zwei Drittel der Deutschen sind für die "Homo-Ehe"". bild.de. 2 June 2015.
- Broadbent, Emma; Gougoulis, John; Lui, Nicole; Pota, Vikas; Simons, Jonathan (January 2017). "What The World's Young People Think And Feel" (PDF). Varkey Foundation. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 August 2019. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
- "Germans not opposed to same sex marriage". Deutsche Welle. 12 January 2017.
- "Politbarometer: Deutliche Mehrheit für die Homo-Ehe". ZDF. 23 June 2017. Archived from the original on 23 June 2017.
- Religion and society, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
- Being Christian in Western Europe, Pew Research Center, 29 May 2018
- Eastern and Western Europeans Differ on Importance of Religion, Views of Minorities, and Key Social Issues, Pew Research Center, 2017
- "Eurobarometer on Discrimination 2019: The social acceptance of LGBTI people in the EU". TNS. European Commission. p. 2. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
External links
- "Act on Registered Life Partnerships". Gesetze im Internet. 2022. Archived from the original on 27 September 2024.
- "Gesetz zur Einführung des Rechts auf Eheschließung für Personen gleichen Geschlechts" [Law introducing the right to marry for persons of the same sex]. Federal Ministry of Justice (in German). Archived from the original on 8 December 2018.
LGBTQ in Germany | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History |
| ||||||||||
Rights and law |
| ||||||||||
Organizations | |||||||||||
Locations |
| ||||||||||
Media |
|
Same-sex marriage in Europe | |
---|---|
Sovereign states |
|
States with limited recognition | |
Dependencies and other entities | |
Other entities |
Status of same-sex unions around the world | ||
---|---|---|
Africa | ||
Americas | ||
Asia | ||
Europe |
| |
Oceania |
| |
Antarctica |
|