Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ckatz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:44, 7 June 2010 editRHB100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,197 edits →Don't you understand Error Analysis belongs in the GPS article?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:49, 6 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,540 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Ckatz/Archive 13) (botTag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
<span id="RealTitle" style="display:none">''User talk:''Ckatz</span> <span id="RealTitle" style="display:none">''User talk:''Ckatz</span>
{{User:Ckatz/Talknote}} {{User:Ckatz/Talknote}}
{| class="infobox" width="150" {| class="infobox" width="150"
Line 14: Line 14:
|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}{{archive-nav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}{{archive-nav}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 9 |counter = 13
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(3d) |algo = old(5d)
|archive = User talk:Ckatz/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Ckatz/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
Line 26: Line 26:
{{TOChidden}} {{TOChidden}}


== GAR notification ==
== Reverted changes - please explain ==


], an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Please let me know why you reverted the changes to:


== WikiCup 2018 November newsletter ==
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&direction=prev&oldid=337361167


The WikiCup is over for another year! Our '''Champion''' this year is {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}}, who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:
I had posted the following information, directly related to the subject, which has factual evidence supporting it....


#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}}
The decision has subsequently given rise to a grassroots protest group, created by Christopher White on December 30, 2009, on the Facebook website entitled "Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament" which has been featured in global news headlines and attracted a membership of over 150,000 in its first 12 days of being online.
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kees08}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|SounderBruce}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Nova Crystallis}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Iazyges}}
#{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Ceranthor}}


== cmt ==


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:
== Reverting of affective computing and e-mail ==


*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Casliber}} wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
The modifications I did to ] and ] were partly coming from my articles, which cite other sources. Consequently, these ideas are not only mines, and, furthermore, you make a mistake when confounding ''citing sources'' and ''making self-promotion''.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Courcelles}} wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Kosack}} wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Cartoon network freak}} wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Usernameunique }} wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Zanhe}} wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
*{{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant9|Aoba47}} wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.


Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
== Casio Watch Links ==


Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.
Hi,


Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to ''']'''; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Godot13}}, {{user4|Cwmhiraeth}} and {{User4|Vanamonde93}}.
Sir i am the collector of vintage Casio digital LCD watches, calculator watches and melody alarm chronographs and games watches. i made a site on Casio digital watches , which contain information about vintage Casio digital LCD watches and i also made a site on vintage rare digital LCD Watches which also contain pictures of vintage digital watches from Casio Seiko and Citizen. and they both sites contain just information and pictures vintage digital watches to help digital watches collectors. i am not spamming and i just want my both websites will add in the any of Casio watch related article external links on wikipedia, so please allow me add these both sites on Calculator Watches Article. or suggest me any of your article which will be suitable to my sites.
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=866078143 -->


== WikiCup 2022 September newsletter ==
Sorry for my Poor English.


== WikiCup 2023 September newsletter ==
Waiting for your early Positive reply.


The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Please reply in my messages.


*{{flagicon|New York (state)}} ], with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Thanks and Warm Ragards
*{{flagicon image|Transgender Pride flag.svg|link=Transgender}} ], with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Kashif
*{{flagicon image|Flag of Mars.svg|link=Mars}} ], with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.


Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
== Talkback ==


Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on ]. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on ], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from ].</small>
{{Talkback|CelticWonder|Your Letterman relocations}}


I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Misplaced Pages and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. ] (]), and ] (])
== Tea Studies Index(Non-encyclopedic content.) ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1172692052 -->

]
Can you give me some suggestions on what needs changing(format), also where can I ask for help for others to participate in helping.

Below are some reasons for the need of this article

* 1. On wiki there are many sections on terminology and classification.
* 2. A Tea Studies Index information/article.
* 3. In the Chinese language, there is a very detailed complete tea studies, terminology, and index, yet English has none yet.
* 4. I propose this Tea Studies Index just like other fields have specialized terminology, index, and classification.
* 5. The Tea Studies Index information/article I am the writer/owner, yet I give full permission to the wiki website for use and revisement or such, and give the above information to public domain use. No copyright infringements, any of this article's info, as been derived from posts from my blog (5 years noncommercial and I am the only poster therefore no permission needed)dedicated to tea studies education Where I have posted some of this information about tea studies index. We also will be using this information at ] and throught the tea studies community.
*"http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Tea_Studies_Index some of the above info is from "

== External Reference and permission ==

*Cited from the book.
*“Chinese-English Tea Studies Terminology”,Translators and Editors: Tsai, Rong-Tsang and Steven R. Jones(me)
Lu-Yu Tea Culture Institute, Co., Ltd. (2010), ISBN978-957-9690-06-5《中英文茶學術語》 ( 陸羽茶藝股份有限公司 , 2010, ISBN978-957-9690-06-5) 編譯者：蔡榮章‧瓊斯史迪芬
*]
*We give Misplaced Pages this article/post ] for usage and public domain.

== about your message ==

Bye for now.

== About Alhambra ==

Hi Ckatz,

I write about your editing in the Alhambra page. I added a couple of sites I think that have the most complete information about the monument.

AlhambraDeGranada.org is an old page with very detailed descriptions of the places inside the Alhambra. An exalmple is the Places and spots section (http://www.alhambradegranada.org/en/info/placesandspots.asp).

Alhambra-patronato.es is the official website.

So, I think they should be there.

I wait for your comments. Best regards :)

Javilillo74

== Koobits ==

Hi Ckatz, my article got into some trouble. http://en.wikipedia.org/Koobits Could you please help me?

It says:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.

* The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed. Tagged since April 2010.
* It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. Tagged since April 2010.
* It may require general cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. Tagged since April 2010.
* It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter. Tagged since April 2010.

How to establish notability? The article was written form a neutral point of view, with references showing the facts. Why is it considered not notable?

In http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability, it says

If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:

* Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject for advice on where to look for sources.
* Put the {{notability}} tag on the article to alert other editors.
* If the article is about a specialized field, use the {{expert-subject}} tag with a specific WikiProject to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to reliable sources not available online.

I believe there are sufficient coverage in the page reinforcing the validity or notability for that matter. Does the problem lie with the {{notability}} tag?

I did not change the content. Why the sudden warning? Will there be future warnings even if there are no changes to the content? Is it possible for other users to sabotage a page by falsely alleging that the page is not ‘notable’, or any other kinds of complaints for that matter?

I use DELL as an example, they seem to have no problem. Why do I have so many problems? =(


I feel so sad when my article gets rejected. Please help me!
Thank you!

== Porches Pottery ==

Dear Ckatz. IU'm a little confused as to
"It needs proper, third-party sources tied to the text in the article,"
Everything in the text is factual. There are several books in sources and further info where this can be verified. If you google "Porches Pottery" you wil find the same information. As for third party, in these books Porches pottery is talked about by people such as ] (art critic to Irish Times for 35 years), ], ] , Fernando de Azvedo (painter and President of Sociadede de Bellas Artes, Lisbon), Richard Morphet (Keeper, Tate Britain from 1986 until 1998)- which i've now added- etc.
Richard Morphert:
" He later set up a pottery in the Algarve, whose part in the revival of the regional craft has been recognised. Here Swift made a huge contribution to the popularisation of the Algarve, and to the recognition of the beauty of Portugal's landscape, history and culture."

I'm also not sure which part of the text you think needs sources tied to it? Or why? "to support the claims." ? Two artist set up a pottery to try and revive the local pottery industry. This is well know to anyone who knows Porches, the Artists, the Algarve etc. All is supported by books etc in sources. The rest is mainly info on pottery, methods of decoration etc. This is not a scientific or academic entry.

"It also needs an involved rewrite to clean out "fluffy" text"
What you regard as fluffy i imagine is the mind-set and inclanation of the two artists who set out to save the local pottery industry from extinction- which has been recognised by the Portuguese Government. These are two well known artists. What one person may regard as ´fluffy' others will think as something that should be celebrated.

In my opinion the article needs no further work. And i've studied Patrick Swift and read these books. The fact that someone has not read these books, does not know Porches Pottery, Patrick Swift etc does not mean the article needs further sources.
: Fernando de Azvedo in An Irish Painter In Portugal, 2001, Crawford Municipal Art Gallery, Cork (ISBN 0-946846-75-8) actually says that Swift's setting up of Porches Pottery is something that the Portuguese people should be always grateful for.

== Porches Pottery ==

Dear Ckatz. Again.I still fail to see the validity of your arguments. The history of Porches Pottery, in short, is thus: Patrick Swift, artist, is living in the Algarve. Lima de Freitas, artists, has a house there. Both like crafts. Swift had lectured on ceramics in London. The Algarve up until the early 60's had a thriving pottery industry. The Algarve at this stage was still virtually stuck in the middle ages. With the arrival, in the Algarve, of modern manufacturing, especially plastic wares, the local people, thinking these were better, more modern, would purchase the mass produced plastics etc wares. The pottery industry lost its market. Swift and Lima, both having a love of crafts, decided to try and revive the industry. They thought that decorating the pots etc would make them attractive to tourists. They created a range of paterns etc that they thought were true to the past civilisations that inhabited the Algarve. Thankfully their idea worked so well that Porches Pottery is still in existance and it is famous for its pottery. In fact the Algarve is now generally regarded as being a place to buy ceramics, though most of what is on sale is not produced in the Algarve. It's still the only working pottery in the Algarve. However, due in no small past to Porches Pottery, there are many small studios producing pottery. Unfortunately there are also countless shops selling pottery produced in northern portugal and elsewhere.

Now, this is the interesting history behind Porches. If you don't like its history, think its 'fluffy' etc that does not mean that the history lacks validity, sources, or is in some way promoting. That is the history of that pottery. And it is a history that many, including myself, think should be celebrated. Others in this catagory include the Portuguese Government (who made the building a nationally listed building- though it was build by Swift in early 70's), coultless artists etc etc.

Anyone with an interest in Art, crafts, pottery, Algarve would be interested in this story.
I fail to understand why the history of the pottery should be altered to something other than the truth?

Also, it would be useful if contributors checked sources, validity of sources, history behing article etc before you state it lacks sources, lacks validity etc. If you have not read the books, do not know the story, this does not mean it is unvalidated or lacking in sources. And it would be useful to contact other contributors before making such statements. There is also a discussions page. The dicussions page is the only suitable place for discussions on the 'style' of an article.
: Also, your statement: "simply saying "everything is true and verifiable" along with a long list of books and sites doesn't help a non-resident to verify the claims" . I'm not sure i follow. Are books not verifiable sources? What in the lords name is verifiable then?

I leave you to please undo your last edit. I do not want some editorial argument which is unwarranted. {{unsigned|TisTRU}}

:Thank you for your note. I see now where your confusion lies; you appear to be misinterpreting the expressed concerns as an argument for ''not including'' the article. That is not the case; what needs to be done is that the ''writing'' and ''references'' need to be brought in line with Misplaced Pages's standards. Copyediting serves to rework the writing style, layout, etc. to make the article match other entries; peacock terms are overly promotional words and phrases that - while appropriate for promotional literature - do not belong in an encyclopedia article. Finally, with regard to references, you have provided a list of books and links. However, not all of those entires meet the standards of our ] guideline, and they also need to be matched to the important facts and details in the article. Given that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, we place a high importance on making sure that any reader can also ''verify'' the facts that are presented. I hope this eases your concerns. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 17:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

:: It does seem like we are failing to progress here with these discussions. And we do want progress do we not? We don't just want to leave aspersions on the article hanging over it now do we. There is something about the article that you do not like. However, you are not helping by not specifying what it is you dislike. I'm at a total loss as to what sources etc would satisfy you? Books and links don't seem to cut the mustard. With the wording, again you have failed to point out what wording you think is inappropriate. It sems to me you have an issue with the history of Porches Pottery and don't believe, or do not want to believe, its history. It's clear that you have no knowledge of Porches Pottery nor of the two artists who founded it. Yet you feel totally at liberty to cast doubt on the article.
I refer you to Misplaced Pages regarding verifiability:
"The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material added to Misplaced Pages has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." - If you search for "Patrick Swift" in www.abebooks.com or www.amazon.com most of these books will come for anyone to purchase.

Misplaced Pages on Citations:
"Citations are usually presented within articles in one of five ways:
General reference: By placing the citation in a list at the end of an article.
Footnote: By placing it in a footnote, with a link following the assertion (whether a clause, sentence, paragraph, etc.) that it supports. "

Now. I have done both of those.

What it seems you are suggesting is that there are several linked references in the article itself. Something like : Patrick Swift and Lima de Freitas founded <fef>.
But i don't see the necessity for that nor do i see how or where you could do it? Perhaps if you pointed out parts that you think need linked references i will tell you where to find that information and add it as a reference. But this is not an overly complex entry. It is a pottery. And there are no major claims made. Certainly none that can't be verified -even by a thorough google search- and that aren't common knowledge to those who know the pottery etc.

It would probably be of use if you pointed out what you think lacks credibility. And Why. I'm honestly at a loss.

::Also, these are some pretty major figues in the art world who talk about Swift and Porches Pottery: Fernando de Azvedo (painter and President of Sociadede de Bellas Artes, Lisbon); Peter Murray (Director of Crawfor Art Gallery, Cork), ] (arts critic to the Irish Times)...

:: This link will bring you to tha amazon website where the AA Spiral Guide to Algarve can be purchased. It has over two pages dedicated to Swift and the pottery (up till 2009. I've not seen the 2010 edition if there is one) That doesn't seem to work so here is the title Algarve (AA Spiral Guides) by Paul Murphy and Susie Boulton (Spiral-bound). Its on amazon etc.

::: Ckatz. Re-reading I've probably been a bit defensive and quick in passing judgement. To be honest i'm probably getting a bit tired of wikipedia. I took offence because i created the article, and as i've studied Swift i know the history of the Pottery etc. And i also took offense at the implied suggestion that the article lacked credibility etc. But it's a pottery so my attitude etc is unecessary really, interesting as the subject is. I've added a couple of links to bits about Lima de Freitas (I think he's on Portuguese wiki). I suppose if you've not read the books, been to the pottery, spoken to people who know it etc you'll not be able to verify the history. In which case I can't see the sources ever passing whatever test there is. As i don't see the point of having an article that has doubts as to sources etc plastered all over it - wiki has enough problems with credibility- then we may as well delete the article. Not entirely sure how thats done but imagine it would need an editor. Anyways i'm off on holiday shortly. - Yep, thinking about it i'd rather it was deleted. Its a charming story and I'd rather not have my including it in[REDACTED] as being the source for people doubting the story.

::::TisTRU, '''no-one is suggesting the article should be deleted'''. It requires cleanup, and the tags are there to draw the attention of skilled copy editors. As for the references, it is simply a case of taking the sources, identifying which ones meet the ] guideline, and then matching those up to details in the text. Again, '''no deletion is proposed'''. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 16:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

::::: Yes, but if the sources that are there now etc do not meet the criteria then I'm not sure the article will ever meet the criteria. There are probably other sources out there (I know it appeared in a doc on Portugese tv about the Algarve but no idea where to find it or how you'd ref it) but most will be things written by holiday resorts, inflight mags etc. And I don't think it needs to have sources to match the text. Its a pretty simple story. Anyways, no point in having the article there forever with signs regarding the fact it needs improving etc. Especially considering anyone can replace the same signs even if they are removed. It just becomes too tedious. The only thing i can suggest is deleting the article or removing its content and only having something like: "Producer of hand-painted pottery". But then may as well not have it on wiki at all. - as it stands at the moment anyone who looked at the article would think its some fabricated promotional blurb. And that is not doing justice the the pottery, artist and the interesting history behind it, so best simply to remove it.

:::::: Ckatz. I'm not sure editors on wiki - and others - realise how frustrating it is to have someone alter, cast doubt upon, leave signs saying an article needs improving etc etc when there is absolutely no discussion or suggestions. Imagine such a thing in any other field or walk of life. Now, in an effort to try and see what the issues are and if we can find a way around them - for you must understand, for my part the article is fine- I have identified a few of what i assume you term peacock terms. These are as folllows:
''Famous producer'' (You could call it peacock but it is true. There is no other pottery in Porches and never has been. Though there is now a studio in Olaria Pequena, which was the first location of Porches Pottery. You could almost extend this to Algarve for 'traditional' Algarve pottery that people buy in shops is made in Northern Portugal for tourists- nothing traditional about it)

''in order to revive'' (But this is true. Their aim was to enable the potters to sell their goods. Being artists they naturally though of decorating. Swift, in fact, wanted the Pottery to include all sorts of craftsmen etc. He wanted a centre where traditional craftspeople could make and sell their goods- earn a living really. The fact that the pottery itself became successful does not detract from the original goal. That was a bonus for Swift and Lima. And Swift was a slight communist when it came to the Algarve people)

''Porches Pottery continues to produce and the town of Porches –and the Algarve generally- is today famous for its pottery and ceramics workshops.'' (As i mentioned, Porches is famous for Pottery. Yet only has Porches Pottery and, now, a studio in Olaria Pequena, that make pottery. Its actully Porches Pottery itself that people mean, or should mean. The other shops in Porches sell pottery produced elsewhere. Its a very similar situation with the Algarve generally. Today there are many studios. But, that i am aware, no other potteries. Buy can remove and just say still producing. )

''Saddened by this decline, Swift was determined to revive this ancient craft'' (He was a romantic man. And he was saddened. Read his book Algarve: A Portait And A Guide. There is a link to bits from his book here: . Now, because the pottery became successful is not a reason to doubt this. But it can be removed, just doesn't do justice to the story or its truth)

''lovely surroundings'' (They are but may as well remove 'lovely')

''into a lovely walled garden'' (Same as above)

''impressive plaster mouldings''( Ditto)

But the point is the story is true. Its what makes it interesting and is what others will find interesting. I suppose from your position you just see a successful algarve pottery shop. But, the fact that it is also that, does not detract from its origins. And the fact that it is still a working, successful pottery is to be commended. If only more such stories were out there. Hopefully someone will be inspired.

But, if the sources etcf do not satisfy I would rather have no article. Beacuse whats there is the truth.

Having said that i suppose could just have ''Producer of hand-painted pottery''; Please see bla bla for interesting history.







== Emma Coolidge again ==

Hey. Someone tried to work around the block you put on the Emma Coolidge article, and recreated it as ]. I made it into a redirect, but the person may start edit warring over it again. The person seems to have created an account, so it may be best to full protect both. ]]] 16:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Edit without summary ==

Hi, would you mind if I asked for a reason for recent revert? ] (]) 20:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ckatz. Why the reverted edits for Alastair's books? Is there a standard format for book citation?

Norm <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Don't you understand Error Analysis belongs in the GPS article? ==

Ckatz, Don't you understand Error Analysis belongs in the GPS article? If you don't, try to educate yourself by reading the talk page. {{unsigned|RHB100}}
:I think you're misunderstanding the purpose of the "main article" tag; it points readers to an article that expands on the content presented in the section. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 03:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
== I have been insulted ==
Now, I have been insulted over and over again. For example, Mcorazao stated "You have offered no counter-proposal". This is just an outright lie and I am sick of being insulted in this manner and in other ways by Mcorazao. Now you may think that I am supposed to sit back and allow myself to be insulted and do nothing to defend myself. But if Mcorazao insults me again, I am going to retaliate. I am a licensed professional engineer. I hold advanced engineering degrees from both the University of Arkansas and UCLA and I am going to defend my honor and my self respect. '''So I think what you should do is tell Mcorazao to stop insulting me.''' ] (]) 20:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:49, 6 January 2025

User talk:Ckatz

Ckatz is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to use email. I'll check in when I can, but please understand that circumstances may create a significant delay between when you post and when I am able to respond. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Hello! Thanks for dropping by... please feel free to leave me a message below. I don't have a convention as to where I'll respond, be it here, your talk page, or the talk page of the subject we're discussing - but I'll do my best to keep things clear. Let me know if you have a preference... now, get typing! Ckatz
Archive

Archives

Index
Page One
Page Two
Page Three
Page Four
Page Five
Page Six
Page Seven
Page Eight
Page Nine
Page Ten





Frequently asked questions

  • Where can I learn more about editing Misplaced Pages?
  • Why was the link I added removed from an article?
    • Typically, links are removed because they fail the external links guideline. Although many links are deleted because they were placed by spammers, links to good sites are also removed on a regular basis. This is because Misplaced Pages isn't a directory service; the mere fact a site exists does not mean it warrants a link.
  • Why was my article deleted?
    • Pages can be deleted for many reasons; there are very specific criteria that govern the process. Please review this article for more information.
  • Why was information relating to my company or organization removed?
  • Why were my spelling changes reverted?
Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style recommends the use of regional varieties of English, based on the topic and the article's contribution history. Please avoid changing spellings unless they differ from the appropriate version. Most spell checking software can be configured to use British and American English; some extend this to include other varieties such as Canadian or Australian English.
Contents

GAR notification

Calvin and Hobbes, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is South Carolina Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1. South Carolina Courcelles (submissions)
  2. Wales Kosack (submissions)
  3. Hel, Poland Kees08 (submissions)
  4. SounderBruce (submissions)
  5. Scotland Cas Liber (submissions)
  6. Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7. Republic of Texas Iazyges (submissions)
  8. United States Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
  • Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
  • Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Misplaced Pages and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

User talk:Ckatz: Difference between revisions Add topic