Revision as of 21:29, 18 November 2024 editMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,287 edits Add section headers in an attempt at an organization of content; but note that there is a mix of timeline-based, and region-based content (and the timeline-based is not in chrono order) that will need refactoring later, for now, it is a mixture of the two. This simply slaps some headings on the content we inherited from the main article.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:36, 9 January 2025 edit undoMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,287 edits →top: Combine first two sentences for a smoother read, and a WP:LEADSENTENCE that actually does the job. Formerly, it was just a dictionary def of the word 'epigraphy'; not what the lead sentence is for. |
(32 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Short description|Study of ancient Sanskrit inscriptions}} |
|
{{short desc|none}} |
|
|
{{draft|join-in=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Early inscriptions == |
|
|
|
|
|
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{efn|Some scholars date these to the 2nd century BCE.<ref>{{cite book |author=Jan Gonda |author-link=Jan Gonda |title=Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |year=2016 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-8082-2 |page=166, note 243 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144448/https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=James Hegarty |title=Religion, Narrative and Public Imagination in South Asia: Past and place in the Sanskrit Mahabharata |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46 |year=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-64589-1 |page=46, note 118 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144615/https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>}}{{efn|Prakrit inscriptions of ancient India, such as those of Ashoka, are older. Louis Renou called it "the great linguistical ] of India" that the Sanskrit inscriptions appear later than ] inscriptions, although Prakrit is considered as a descendant of the Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} }} These include the ] (Uttar Pradesh) and ] (near ], Rajasthan) inscriptions.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}<ref>{{cite book |author=Theo Damsteegt |title=Epigraphical Hybrid Sanskrit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |year=1978 |publisher=Brill Academic |pages=209–211 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |url-status=live }}</ref> Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the ] on a red sandstone slab and the long ] on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats.<ref>{{cite book |author=Sonya Rhie Quintanilla |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |year=2007 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15537-4 |pages=254–255 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (]).{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=87 with footnotes}} These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the ] ] and the subsequent ].{{efn|According to Salomon, towards the end of pre-Christian era, "a smattering" of standard or nearly standard Sanskrit inscriptions came into vogue, and "we may assume that these are isolated survivals of what must have been then an increasingly common practice". He adds, that the Scythian rulers of northern and western India while not the originators, were promoters of the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions, and "their motivation in promoting Sanskrit was presumably a desire to establish themselves as legitimate Indian or at least Indianized rulers and to curry the favor of the educated Brahmanical elite".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=93}} }} These are also in the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa ] from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the ]: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (], images) and calls the five Vrishnis as ''bhagavatam''.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}}<ref>{{cite book|author=Sonya Rhie Quintanilla|title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC|year=2007|publisher=BRILL Academic|isbn=978-90-04-15537-4|pages=260–263|access-date=8 August 2018|archive-date=2 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC|url-status=live}}</ref> There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the ] and the ].<ref>{{cite book |author=Sonya Rhie Quintanilla |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |year=2007 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15537-4 |page=260 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |url-status=live }}</ref> The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from ] which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=88}}<ref>Inscription No 21 in {{cite book |last1=Janert |first1=l |title=Mathura Inscriptions |date=1961 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201093}}</ref> A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=88–89}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=300 |
|
{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=300 |
|
| image1=2nd century BCE Hindu Sanskrit inscription Nanaghat cave, I-1a.jpg |
|
| image1=2nd century BCE Hindu Sanskrit inscription Nanaghat cave, I-1a.jpg |
Line 19: |
Line 11: |
|
| footer = Starting in about the 1st century BCE, Sanskrit has been written in many South Asian, Southeast Asian and Central Asian scripts. |
|
| footer = Starting in about the 1st century BCE, Sanskrit has been written in many South Asian, Southeast Asian and Central Asian scripts. |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
'''Sanskrit epigraphy''', the study of ancient inscriptions in ], offers insight into the ], ], and ] of South Asia and its neighbors. ], such as those from the {{BCE|1st century|link=y}} in ] and ], are written in ] and reflect the transition to ]. The Mathura inscriptions from the {{CE|1st and 2nd centuries|link=y}}, including the ] and ] inscriptions, represent significant contributions to the early use of Sanskrit, often linked to Hindu and Jaina traditions. |
|
|
|
|
|
The turning point in Sanskrit epigraphy came with the ] inscription from the mid-2nd century CE, which established a poetic eulogy style later adopted during the ]. This era saw Sanskrit become the predominant language for royal and religious records, documenting donations, public works, and the glorification of rulers. In South India, inscriptions such as those from ] and ] illustrate early use in ] and ] contexts, transitioning to exclusive Sanskrit use from the 4th century CE. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sanskrit inscriptions extended beyond South Asia, influencing Southeast Asia from the 4th century CE onward. ] adapted for Sanskrit were found in regions like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Cambodia, where they evolved into local scripts such as Khmer, Javanese, and Balinese. These inscriptions highlight the spread of ] and ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
By the classical period, Sanskrit inscriptions across ] became central to documenting royal achievements, religious activities, and societal developments. The decline of Sanskrit epigraphy coincided with the rise of regional languages in inscriptions, yet its legacy endures in the historical and cultural records it preserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Early inscriptions == |
|
|
|
|
|
] in ]]] |
|
|
] 1st century CE]] |
|
|
] |
|
|
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{efn|Some scholars date these to the 2nd century BCE.{{sfn|Gonda|2016|p=166, fn 243}}{{sfn|Hegarty|2013|p=146, fn 118}} }}{{efn|Prakrit inscriptions of ancient India, such as those of Ashoka, are older. Louis Renou called it "the great linguistical ] of India" that the Sanskrit inscriptions appear later than ] inscriptions, although Prakrit is considered as a descendant of the Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} }} These include the ] (Uttar Pradesh) and ] (near ], Rajasthan) inscriptions.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{sfn|Damsteegt|1978|p=209–211}} Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the ] on a red sandstone slab and the long ] on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats.{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=254–255}} Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (]).{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=87 with footnotes}} These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the ] ] and the subsequent ].{{efn|According to Salomon, towards the end of pre-Christian era, "a smattering" of standard or nearly standard Sanskrit inscriptions came into vogue, and "we may assume that these are isolated survivals of what must have been then an increasingly common practice". He adds, that the Scythian rulers of northern and western India while not the originators, were promoters of the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions, and "their motivation in promoting Sanskrit was presumably a desire to establish themselves as legitimate Indian or at least Indianized rulers and to curry the favor of the educated Brahmanical elite".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=93}} }} These are also in the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa ] from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the ]: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (], images) and calls the five Vrishnis as ''bhagavatam''.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}}{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260–263}} There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the ] and the ].{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260}} The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from ] which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=88}}<ref>Inscription No 21 in {{cite book |last1=Janert |first1=l |title=Mathura Inscriptions |date=1961 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201093}}</ref> A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=88–89}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Northwest India == |
|
== Northwest India == |
Line 25: |
Line 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
== South India == |
|
== South India == |
|
|
|
|
|
] Ayaka pillar inscription, ] period (3rd c. CE)]] |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] inscriptions are the earliest known substantial South Indian Sanskrit inscriptions, probably from the late 3rd century or early 4th century CE, or both.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–94}} These inscriptions are related to Buddhism and the ] tradition of Hinduism.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=90–91}} A few of these inscriptions from both traditions are verse-style in the classical Sanskrit language, while some such as the pillar inscription is written in prose and a hybridized Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–94}} An earlier hybrid Sanskrit inscription found on Amaravati slab is dated to the late 2nd century, while a few later ones include Sanskrit inscriptions along with Prakrit inscriptions related to Hinduism and Buddhism.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=90–91 with footnote 51}} After the 3rd century CE, Sanskrit inscriptions dominate and many have survived.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–93}} Between the 4th and 7th centuries CE, south Indian inscriptions are exclusively in the Sanskrit language.{{efn|Finally, after this transitional period in the fourth and early fifth centuries CE, Prakrit fell out of use completely in southern Indian inscriptions. For the next few centuries Sanskrit was the sole epigraphic language, until the regional Dravidian languages began to come into use around the seventh century. — {{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} }} In the eastern regions of South Asia, scholars report minor Sanskrit inscriptions from the 2nd century, these being fragments and scattered. The earliest substantial true Sanskrit language inscription of Susuniya (]) is dated to the 4th century.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} Elsewhere, such as Dehradun (]), inscriptions in more or less correct classical Sanskrit inscriptions are dated to the 3rd century.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} |
|
The ] inscriptions are the earliest known substantial South Indian Sanskrit inscriptions, probably from the late 3rd century or early 4th century CE, or both.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–94}} These inscriptions are related to Buddhism and the ] tradition of Hinduism.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=90–91}} A few of these inscriptions from both traditions are verse-style in the classical Sanskrit language, while some such as the pillar inscription is written in prose and a hybridized Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–94}} An earlier hybrid Sanskrit inscription found on Amaravati slab is dated to the late 2nd century, while a few later ones include Sanskrit inscriptions along with Prakrit inscriptions related to Hinduism and Buddhism.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=90–91 with footnote 51}} After the 3rd century CE, Sanskrit inscriptions dominate and many have survived.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=91–93}} Between the 4th and 7th centuries CE, south Indian inscriptions are exclusively in the Sanskrit language.{{efn|Finally, after this transitional period in the fourth and early fifth centuries CE, Prakrit fell out of use completely in southern Indian inscriptions. For the next few centuries Sanskrit was the sole epigraphic language, until the regional Dravidian languages began to come into use around the seventh century. — {{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} }} In the eastern regions of South Asia, scholars report minor Sanskrit inscriptions from the 2nd century, these being fragments and scattered. The earliest substantial true Sanskrit language inscription of Susuniya (]) is dated to the 4th century.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} Elsewhere, such as Dehradun (]), inscriptions in more or less correct classical Sanskrit inscriptions are dated to the 3rd century.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=92}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Classical period and decline == |
|
== Southeast Asia == |
|
|
|
|
|
] inscription, eastern Borneo, 5th c. CE]] |
|
|
|
|
|
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near ] and the Sak River, early 5th century in ] (known as the ] discovered in ]), and mid-5th century in west ] (Indonesia).{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–456}} The Indic scripts, particularly the ] prototype,{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=446–448}} spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts.{{sfn|Masica|1993|pp=143–144}} From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Decline == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
]'' (panegyric) style, ], c. 450 CE]] |
|
According to Salomon, the 4th-century reign of ] was the turning point when the classical Sanskrit language became established as the "epigraphic language par excellence" of the Indian world.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} These Sanskrit language inscriptions are either "donative" or "panegyric" records. Generally in accurate classical Sanskrit, they deploy a wide range of regional Indic writing systems extant at the time.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=110–112, 132–148}} They record the donation of a temple or stupa, images, land, monasteries, pilgrim's travel record, public infrastructure such as water reservoir and irrigation measures to prevent famine. Others praise the king or the donor in lofty poetic terms.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=110–126}} The Sanskrit language of these inscriptions is written on stone, various metals, terracotta, wood, crystal, ivory, shell, and cloth.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=126–132}}{{efn| The use of the Sanskrit language in epigraphy gradually dropped after the arrival and the consolidation of Islamic ] rule in the late 12th century, but it remained in active epigraphical use in the south and central regions of India. By about the 14th century, with the Islamic armies conquering more of South Asia, the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions became rarer and it was replaced with Persian, Arabic, Dravidian and North-Indo-Aryan languages, states Salomon.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=148–149}} The Sanskrit language, particularly in bilingual form, re-emerged in the epigraphy of Hindu kingdoms such as the Vijayanagara, Yadavas, Hoysalas, Pandyas, and others that re-established themselves.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=149–150}} Some Muslim rulers such as Adil Shah also issued Sanskrit language inscriptions recording the donation of a mosque.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=149–150}} }} |
|
|
|
According to Salomon, the 4th-century reign of ] was the turning point when the classical Sanskrit language became established as the "epigraphic language par excellence" of the Indian world.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} These Sanskrit language inscriptions are either donative or panegyric records. Generally in accurate classical Sanskrit, they deploy a wide range of regional Indic writing systems extant at the time.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=110–112, 132–148}} Donative inscriptions record the donation of a temple or ], images, land, monasteries, pilgrim's travel record, public infrastructure such as water reservoir and irrigation measures to prevent famine. Panegyrics praise the king or the donor in lofty poetic terms.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=110–126}} The Sanskrit language of these inscriptions is written on stone, various metals, terracotta, wood, crystal, ivory, shell, and cloth.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=126–132}}{{efn| The use of the Sanskrit language in epigraphy gradually dropped after the arrival and the consolidation of Islamic ] rule in the late 12th century, but it remained in active epigraphical use in the south and central regions of India. By about the 14th century, with the Islamic armies conquering more of South Asia, the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions became rarer and it was replaced with Persian, Arabic, Dravidian and North-Indo-Aryan languages, states Salomon.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=148–149}} The Sanskrit language, particularly in bilingual form, re-emerged in the epigraphy of Hindu kingdoms such as the Vijayanagara, Yadavas, Hoysalas, Pandyas, and others that re-established themselves.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=149–150}} Some Muslim rulers such as Adil Shah also issued Sanskrit language inscriptions recording the donation of a mosque.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=149–150}} }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== See also == |
|
== First millennium BCE – southeast Asia == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{div col |colwidth=20em}} |
|
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE.{{sfn|Peter T. Daniels|1996|pp=445–447, in the chapter by Christopher Court}} A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near ] and the Sak River, early 5th century in ] (known as the ] discovered in ]), and mid-5th century in west ] (Indonesia).{{sfn|Peter T. Daniels|1996|pp=445–447 in the chapter by Christopher Court}} Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common.{{sfn|Peter T. Daniels|1996|pp=445–456 in the chapter by Christopher Court}} The Indic scripts, particularly the ] prototype,{{sfn|Peter T. Daniels|1996|pp=446–448 in the chapter by Christopher Court}} spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts.{{sfn|Colin P. Masica|1993|pp=143–144}} From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} |
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '']'' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
{{div col end}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== References == |
|
== References == |
|
|
|
|
;Notes |
|
|
|
=== Notes === |
|
{{notelist}} |
|
{{notelist}} |
|
|
|
|
;Citations |
|
|
|
=== Citations === |
|
{{reflist}} |
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Bibliography === |
|
=== Bibliography === |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Damsteegt |first=Theo |title=Epigraphical Hybrid Sanskrit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |year=1978 |publisher=Brill Academic |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book |last=Daniels |first=Peter T. |title=The World's Writing Systems |year=1996 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-507993-7 |access-date=4 August 2018 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329150129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}} |
|
*{{cite book |
|
|
|
<!-- list chapters cited in Daniels-1996 below with |last=<chapter-author surname> |year=1996 |in=Daniels --> |
|
|author=Peter T. Daniels |
|
|
|
** {{citec |last=Court |first=Christopher |year=1996 |chapter=The Spread of Brahmi Script into Southeast Asia <!--Part VII, section 41--> |in=Daniels |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA445}} |
|
|title=The World's Writing Systems |
|
|
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |
|
|
|year=1996 |
|
|
|publisher=Oxford University Press |
|
|
|isbn=978-0-19-507993-7 |
|
|
|access-date=4 August 2018 |
|
|
|archive-date=29 March 2024 |
|
|
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329150129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |
|
|
|url-status=live |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book|author=Colin P. Masica|title=The Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|year=1993|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-29944-2|access-date=17 July 2018|archive-date=1 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230201230338/https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|url-status=live}} |
|
* {{cite book |last=Gonda |first=Jan |author-link=Jan Gonda |title=Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |year=2016 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-8082-2 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144448/https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Hegarty |first=James |title=Religion, Narrative and Public Imagination in South Asia: Past and place in the Sanskrit Mahabharata |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46 |year=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-64589-1 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144615/https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book |last=Masica |first=Colin P. |year=1993 |title=The Indo-Aryan Languages |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-29944-2|access-date=17 July 2018|archive-date=1 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230201230338/https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|url-status=live}} |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Quintanilla |first=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |year=2007 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15537-4 |pages=254–255 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |url-status=live}} |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book|last=Salomon|first=Richard|title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC|year=1998|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-535666-3|access-date=16 July 2018|archive-date=2 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132352/https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC|url-status=live}} |
|
* {{cite book|last=Salomon|first=Richard|title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC|year=1998|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-535666-3|access-date=16 July 2018|archive-date=2 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132352/https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC|url-status=live}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Further reading == |
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Clackson |first=James |title=Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DJDjNp6wODoC |date=18 October 2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-46734-6 }} |
|
|
* {{cite book | last=Coulson | first=Michael | title=Sanskrit : an introduction to the classical language | editor1=Richard Gombrich | editor2=James Benson | edition=2nd, revised by Gombrich and Benson | publisher=Random House | year=1992 | isbn=978-0-340-56867-5 | oclc=26550827 }} |
|
|
* {{cite journal| title= The Early History of Indo-European Languages|last1=Gamkrelidze| first1= Thomas V.|last2=Ivanov|first2=V. V.| journal = Scientific American| volume= 262| pages= 110–117 | number= 3| year=1990| publisher= Nature America| jstor= 24996796| doi= 10.1038/scientificamerican0390-110 | bibcode= 1990SciAm.262c.110G }} |
|
|
* {{cite book|last=Mahadevan|first=Iravatham|title=Early Tamil Epigraphy from the Earliest Times to the Sixth Century A.D. |publisher= Harvard University Press |year=2003|isbn=978-0-674-01227-1}} |
|
|
* {{cite journal | last=Mallory | first=J. P. | s2cid=197841755 | title=In Search of the Indo-Europeans / Language, Archaeology and Myth | journal=Praehistorische Zeitschrift | publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH | volume=67 | issue=1 | year=1992 | issn=1613-0804 | doi=10.1515/pz-1992-0118}} |
|
|
* {{cite book |author=Ooi |first=Keat Gin |author-link=Keat Gin Ooi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |page=643 |access-date=21 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230116094029/https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC |archive-date=16 January 2023 |url-status=live}} |
|
|
* {{cite book|last=Renfrew|first=Colin|title=Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R645AAAAIAAJ|year=1990|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-38675-3|access-date=17 July 2018|archive-date=29 March 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329150730/https://books.google.com/books?id=R645AAAAIAAJ|url-status=live}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links == |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|url=http://dia.eu5.org/ |
|
|
|title=INDICORPUS-31 |
|
|
}} 31 Sanskrit and Dravidian dictionaries for Lingvo. |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|title=Ancient Sanskrit Online |
|
|
|author1=Karen Thomson |
|
|
|author2=Jonathan Slocum |
|
|
|url=https://lrc.la.utexas.edu/eieol/vedol |
|
|
}} free online lessons from the {{cite web |
|
|
|url=https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/lrc |
|
|
|title=Linguistics Research Center |
|
|
|publisher=] |
|
|
}} |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|title=Samskrita Bharati |
|
|
|url=http://www.samskritabharati.org/ |
|
|
}} an organisation promoting the usage of Sanskrit |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|url=http://sanskritdocuments.org/home.html |
|
|
|title=Sanskrit Documents |
|
|
}} — Documents in ITX format of Upanishads, Stotras etc. |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|title=Sanskrit texts |
|
|
|website=Sacred Text Archive |
|
|
|url=http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/index.htm |
|
|
}} |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|title=Sanskrit Manuscripts |
|
|
|publisher=] |
|
|
|url=http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/collections/sanskrit |
|
|
}} |
|
|
* {{cite web |
|
|
|title=Lexilogos Devanagari Sanskrit Keyboard |
|
|
|url=https://www.lexilogos.com/keyboard/sanskrit_devanagari.htm |
|
|
}} for typing Sanskrit in the Devanagari script. |
|
|
* {{cite web |title=Online Sanskrit Dictionary |url=https://www.sanskritdictionary.com/}} — sources results from Monier Williams etc. |
|
|
* {{cite web |title=The Sanskrit Grammarian |url=https://sanskrit.inria.fr/DICO/grammar.html}} — dynamic online declension and conjugation tool |
|
|
* {{cite web |title=Online Sanskrit Dictionary |url=https://learnsanskrit.cc/}} — Sanskrit hypertext dictionary |
|
|
* {{cite web |title=Sanskrit Shlokas collection |url=https://www.sanatansanskrit.in/2021/05/sanskrit-shlok.html}} — Collection of Sanskrit Shlokas from Various Sanskrit Texts |
|
|
|
|
|
{{commonscat|Sanskrit inscriptions}} |
|
{{Sister bar|auto=1|wikt=Category:Sanskrit language|q=Sanskrit|commonscat=y |b=Sanskrit |voy=Sanskrit phrasebook|iw=sa}} |
|
{{Sister bar|auto=1|wikt=Category:Sanskrit language|q=Sanskrit|commonscat=y |b=Sanskrit |voy=Sanskrit phrasebook|iw=sa}} |
|
{{Sanskrit language topics}} |
|
{{Sanskrit language topics}} |
Line 70: |
Line 153: |
|
{{Authority control}} |
|
{{Authority control}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Draft categories |1= |
|
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
Line 82: |
Line 164: |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
}} |
|
Sanskrit inscriptions extended beyond South Asia, influencing Southeast Asia from the 4th century CE onward. Indic scripts adapted for Sanskrit were found in regions like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Cambodia, where they evolved into local scripts such as Khmer, Javanese, and Balinese. These inscriptions highlight the spread of Indian cultural and religious practices.
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE. These include the Ayodhyā (Uttar Pradesh) and Hāthībādā-Ghosuṇḍī (near Chittorgarh, Rajasthan) inscriptions. Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage". Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the Yavanarajya inscription on a red sandstone slab and the long Naneghat inscription on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats. Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (Uttar Pradesh). These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and the subsequent Kushan Empire. These are also in the Brahmi script. The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa Sodasa from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the Mora Well Inscription. In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the Vrishni heroes: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (murti, images) and calls the five Vrishnis as bhagavatam. There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas. Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the Vasu Doorjamb Inscription and the Mountain Temple inscription. The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from Kankali Tila which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist. A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE. A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near Si Thep and the Sak River, early 5th century in Kutai (known as the Mulavarman inscription discovered in eastern Borneo), and mid-5th century in west Java (Indonesia). Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common. The Indic scripts, particularly the Pallava script prototype, spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts. From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.