Revision as of 03:02, 19 November 2024 editMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,287 editsm Mathglot moved page Draft:Sanskrit epigraphy to Sanskrit epigraphy without leaving a redirect: Ready for prime time; non-bot inlinks that can't be fixed, so no redirect from Draft.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:36, 9 January 2025 edit undoMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,287 edits →top: Combine first two sentences for a smoother read, and a WP:LEADSENTENCE that actually does the job. Formerly, it was just a dictionary def of the word 'epigraphy'; not what the lead sentence is for. |
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Short description|Study of ancient Sanskrit inscriptions}} |
|
{{short desc|none}} |
|
|
{{Cleanup rewrite|it has a confused organization mixing chronological- and region-based sections|date=November 2024}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=300 |
|
{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=300 |
|
| image1=2nd century BCE Hindu Sanskrit inscription Nanaghat cave, I-1a.jpg |
|
| image1=2nd century BCE Hindu Sanskrit inscription Nanaghat cave, I-1a.jpg |
Line 13: |
Line 11: |
|
| footer = Starting in about the 1st century BCE, Sanskrit has been written in many South Asian, Southeast Asian and Central Asian scripts. |
|
| footer = Starting in about the 1st century BCE, Sanskrit has been written in many South Asian, Southeast Asian and Central Asian scripts. |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
'''Sanskrit epigraphy''' is the study of ancient inscriptions in ]. The inscriptions offer insight into the ], ], and ] of South Asia and its neighbors. ], such as those from the {{BCE|1st century|link=y}} in ] and ], are written in ] and reflect the transition to ]. The Mathura inscriptions from the {{CE|1st and 2nd centuries|link=y}}, including the ] and ] inscriptions, represent significant contributions to the early use of Sanskrit, often linked to Hindu and Jaina traditions. |
|
'''Sanskrit epigraphy''', the study of ancient inscriptions in ], offers insight into the ], ], and ] of South Asia and its neighbors. ], such as those from the {{BCE|1st century|link=y}} in ] and ], are written in ] and reflect the transition to ]. The Mathura inscriptions from the {{CE|1st and 2nd centuries|link=y}}, including the ] and ] inscriptions, represent significant contributions to the early use of Sanskrit, often linked to Hindu and Jaina traditions. |
|
|
|
|
|
The turning point in Sanskrit epigraphy came with the ] inscription from the mid-2nd century CE, which established a poetic eulogy style later adopted during the ]. This era saw Sanskrit become the predominant language for royal and religious records, documenting donations, public works, and the glorification of rulers. In South India, inscriptions such as those from ] and ] illustrate early use in ] and ] contexts, transitioning to exclusive Sanskrit use from the 4th century CE. |
|
The turning point in Sanskrit epigraphy came with the ] inscription from the mid-2nd century CE, which established a poetic eulogy style later adopted during the ]. This era saw Sanskrit become the predominant language for royal and religious records, documenting donations, public works, and the glorification of rulers. In South India, inscriptions such as those from ] and ] illustrate early use in ] and ] contexts, transitioning to exclusive Sanskrit use from the 4th century CE. |
Line 26: |
Line 24: |
|
] 1st century CE]] |
|
] 1st century CE]] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{efn|Some scholars date these to the 2nd century BCE.<ref>{{cite book |author=Jan Gonda |author-link=Jan Gonda |title=Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |year=2016 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-8082-2 |page=166, note 243 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144448/https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=James Hegarty |title=Religion, Narrative and Public Imagination in South Asia: Past and place in the Sanskrit Mahabharata |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46 |year=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-64589-1 |page=46, note 118 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144615/https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref>}}{{efn|Prakrit inscriptions of ancient India, such as those of Ashoka, are older. Louis Renou called it "the great linguistical ] of India" that the Sanskrit inscriptions appear later than ] inscriptions, although Prakrit is considered as a descendant of the Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} }} These include the ] (Uttar Pradesh) and ] (near ], Rajasthan) inscriptions.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}<ref>{{cite book |author=Theo Damsteegt |title=Epigraphical Hybrid Sanskrit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |year=1978 |publisher=Brill Academic |pages=209–211 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |url-status=live }}</ref> Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the ] on a red sandstone slab and the long ] on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats.{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=254–255}} Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (]).{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=87 with footnotes}} These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the ] ] and the subsequent ].{{efn|According to Salomon, towards the end of pre-Christian era, "a smattering" of standard or nearly standard Sanskrit inscriptions came into vogue, and "we may assume that these are isolated survivals of what must have been then an increasingly common practice". He adds, that the Scythian rulers of northern and western India while not the originators, were promoters of the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions, and "their motivation in promoting Sanskrit was presumably a desire to establish themselves as legitimate Indian or at least Indianized rulers and to curry the favor of the educated Brahmanical elite".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=93}} }} These are also in the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa ] from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the ]: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (], images) and calls the five Vrishnis as ''bhagavatam''.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}}{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260–263}} There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the ] and the ].{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260}} The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from ] which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=88}}<ref>Inscription No 21 in {{cite book |last1=Janert |first1=l |title=Mathura Inscriptions |date=1961 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201093}}</ref> A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=88–89}} |
|
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{efn|Some scholars date these to the 2nd century BCE.{{sfn|Gonda|2016|p=166, fn 243}}{{sfn|Hegarty|2013|p=146, fn 118}} }}{{efn|Prakrit inscriptions of ancient India, such as those of Ashoka, are older. Louis Renou called it "the great linguistical ] of India" that the Sanskrit inscriptions appear later than ] inscriptions, although Prakrit is considered as a descendant of the Sanskrit language.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} }} These include the ] (Uttar Pradesh) and ] (near ], Rajasthan) inscriptions.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}}{{sfn|Damsteegt|1978|p=209–211}} Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=86–87}} Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the ] on a red sandstone slab and the long ] on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats.{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=254–255}} Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (]).{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=87 with footnotes}} These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the ] ] and the subsequent ].{{efn|According to Salomon, towards the end of pre-Christian era, "a smattering" of standard or nearly standard Sanskrit inscriptions came into vogue, and "we may assume that these are isolated survivals of what must have been then an increasingly common practice". He adds, that the Scythian rulers of northern and western India while not the originators, were promoters of the use of Sanskrit language for inscriptions, and "their motivation in promoting Sanskrit was presumably a desire to establish themselves as legitimate Indian or at least Indianized rulers and to curry the favor of the educated Brahmanical elite".{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=93}} }} These are also in the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa ] from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the ].{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the ]: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (], images) and calls the five Vrishnis as ''bhagavatam''.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}}{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260–263}} There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=87–88}} Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the ] and the ].{{sfn|Quintanilla|2007|pp=260}} The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from ] which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|p=88}}<ref>Inscription No 21 in {{cite book |last1=Janert |first1=l |title=Mathura Inscriptions |date=1961 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.201093}}</ref> A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=88–89}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Northwest India == |
|
== Northwest India == |
Line 42: |
Line 40: |
|
] inscription, eastern Borneo, 5th c. CE]] |
|
] inscription, eastern Borneo, 5th c. CE]] |
|
|
|
|
|
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near ] and the Sak River, early 5th century in ] (known as the ] discovered in ]), and mid-5th century in west ] (Indonesia).{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–456}} The Indic scripts, particularly the ] prototype,{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=446–448}} spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts.{{sfn|Colin P. Masica|1993|pp=143–144}} From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} |
|
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near ] and the Sak River, early 5th century in ] (known as the ] discovered in ]), and mid-5th century in west ] (Indonesia).{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–447}} Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common.{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=445–456}} The Indic scripts, particularly the ] prototype,{{sfn|Court|1996|pp=446–448}} spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts.{{sfn|Masica|1993|pp=143–144}} From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.{{sfn|Salomon|1998|pp=92–93}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==Decline == |
|
==Decline == |
Line 78: |
Line 76: |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Bibliography === |
|
=== Bibliography === |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Damsteegt |first=Theo |title=Epigraphical Hybrid Sanskrit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |year=1978 |publisher=Brill Academic |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mf4UAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA209 |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book |last=Daniels |first=Peter T. |title=The World's Writing Systems |year=1996 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-507993-7 |access-date=4 August 2018 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329150129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}} |
|
*{{cite book |last=Daniels |first=Peter T. |title=The World's Writing Systems |year=1996 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-507993-7 |access-date=4 August 2018 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329150129/https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}} |
|
<!-- list chapters cited in Daniels-1996 below with |last=<chapter-author surname> |year=1996 |in=Daniels --> |
|
<!-- list chapters cited in Daniels-1996 below with |last=<chapter-author surname> |year=1996 |in=Daniels --> |
|
** {{citec |last=Court |first=Christopher |year=1996 |chapter=The Spread of Brahmi Script into Southeast Asia <!--Part VII, section 41--> |in=Daniels |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA445}} |
|
** {{citec |last=Court |first=Christopher |year=1996 |chapter=The Spread of Brahmi Script into Southeast Asia <!--Part VII, section 41--> |in=Daniels |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ospMAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA445}} |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book|author=Colin P. Masica|title=The Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|year=1993|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-29944-2|access-date=17 July 2018|archive-date=1 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230201230338/https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|url-status=live}} |
|
* {{cite book |last=Gonda |first=Jan |author-link=Jan Gonda |title=Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166 |year=2016 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-8082-2 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144448/https://books.google.com/books?id=khrmDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA166#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Hegarty |first=James |title=Religion, Narrative and Public Imagination in South Asia: Past and place in the Sanskrit Mahabharata |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46 |year=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-64589-1 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=29 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240329144615/https://books.google.com/books?id=qMSoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }} |
|
|
|
|
|
*{{cite book |last=Masica |first=Colin P. |year=1993 |title=The Indo-Aryan Languages |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-29944-2|access-date=17 July 2018|archive-date=1 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230201230338/https://books.google.com/books?id=J3RSHWePhXwC|url-status=live}} |
|
|
|
|
|
* {{cite book |last=Quintanilla |first=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |year=2007 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15537-4 |pages=254–255 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |url-status=live}} |
|
* {{cite book |last=Quintanilla |first=Sonya Rhie |title=History of Early Stone Sculpture at Mathura: ca. 150 BCE – 100 CE |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |year=2007 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-90-04-15537-4 |pages=254–255 |access-date=8 August 2018 |archive-date=2 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230702132035/https://books.google.com/books?id=X7Cb8IkZVSMC |url-status=live}} |
Sanskrit inscriptions extended beyond South Asia, influencing Southeast Asia from the 4th century CE onward. Indic scripts adapted for Sanskrit were found in regions like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Cambodia, where they evolved into local scripts such as Khmer, Javanese, and Balinese. These inscriptions highlight the spread of Indian cultural and religious practices.
The earliest known stone inscriptions in Sanskrit are in the Brahmi script from the first century BCE. These include the Ayodhyā (Uttar Pradesh) and Hāthībādā-Ghosuṇḍī (near Chittorgarh, Rajasthan) inscriptions. Both of these, states Salomon, are "essentially standard" and "correct Sanskrit", with a few exceptions reflecting an "informal Sanskrit usage". Other important Hindu inscriptions dated to the 1st century BCE, in relatively accurate classical Sanskrit and Brahmi script are the Yavanarajya inscription on a red sandstone slab and the long Naneghat inscription on the wall of a cave rest stop in the Western Ghats. Besides these few examples from the 1st century BCE, the earliest Sanskrit and hybrid dialect inscriptions are found in Mathura (Uttar Pradesh). These date to the 1st and 2nd century CE, states Salomon, from the time of the Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and the subsequent Kushan Empire. These are also in the Brahmi script. The earliest of these, states Salomon, are attributed to Ksatrapa Sodasa from the early years of 1st century CE. Of the Mathura inscriptions, the most significant is the Mora Well Inscription. In a manner similar to the Hathibada inscription, the Mora well inscription is a dedicatory inscription and is linked to the cult of the Vrishni heroes: it mentions a stone shrine (temple), pratima (murti, images) and calls the five Vrishnis as bhagavatam. There are many other Mathura Sanskrit inscriptions in Brahmi script overlapping the era of Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps and early Kushanas. Other significant 1st-century inscriptions in reasonably good classical Sanskrit in the Brahmi script include the Vasu Doorjamb Inscription and the Mountain Temple inscription. The early ones are related to the Brahmanical, except for the inscription from Kankali Tila which may be Jaina, but none are Buddhist. A few of the later inscriptions from the 2nd century CE include Buddhist Sanskrit, while others are in "more or less" standard Sanskrit and related to the Brahmanical tradition.
The evidence of the use of the Sanskrit language in Indic writing systems appears in southeast Asia in the first half of the 1st millennium CE. A few of these in Vietnam are bilingual where both the Sanskrit and the local language is written in the Indian alphabet. Early Sanskrit language inscriptions in Indic writing systems are dated to the 4th century in Malaysia, 5th to 6th centuries in Thailand near Si Thep and the Sak River, early 5th century in Kutai (known as the Mulavarman inscription discovered in eastern Borneo), and mid-5th century in west Java (Indonesia). Both major writing systems for Sanskrit, the North Indian and South Indian scripts, have been discovered in southeast Asia, but the Southern variety with its rounded shapes are far more common. The Indic scripts, particularly the Pallava script prototype, spread and ultimately evolved into Mon-Burmese, Khmer, Thai, Lao, Sumatran, Celebes, Javanese and Balinese scripts. From about the 5th century, Sanskrit inscriptions become common in many parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, with significant discoveries in Nepal, Vietnam and Cambodia.