Revision as of 17:26, 27 August 2008 editByeitical (talk | contribs)721 edits fix← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:56, 13 January 2025 edit undoΝημινυλι (talk | contribs)99 editsm '~~~~' in section title needs <nowiki> | ||
(1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{lowercase}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 26 | ||
|algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Slakr/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Slakr/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}}{{administrator |
}}{{administrator}} | ||
{| class="messagebox standard" style=background:#FFD0CC | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|style="text-align:center"|'''slakr''''s life is currently ], so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. <br />Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance— that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =)<br /><small>] — ] — ]</small> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
---- | ---- | ||
:] Ideally, please {{highlight|at the '''bottom'''}}. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :) | :] Ideally, please <span class="plainlinks"></span> {{highlight|at the '''bottom'''}}. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<div id="talk" class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE"><div style="padding-right:20px; display:inline;">{{{icon|] }}}</div>Welcome to my talk page. Please ] your entries by inserting '''<nowiki> ~~</nowiki>~~''' at the end.<br /> | <div id="talk" class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE"><div style="padding-right:20px; display:inline;">{{{icon|] }}}</div>Welcome to my talk page. Please ] your entries by inserting '''<nowiki> ~~</nowiki>~~''' at the end.<br /> | ||
'''''' | '''''' | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}}" style="{{#if:{{{width|}}}|width: {{{width|}}};}}{{#if:{{{bgcolor|}}}|background-color: {{{bgcolor|}}};}}" | {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}}" style="{{#if:{{{width|}}}|width: {{{width|}}};}}{{#if:{{{bgcolor|}}}|background-color: {{{bgcolor|}}};}}" | ||
| style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center; margin: 0; padding: 0;" class="plainlinks"| | | style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center; margin: 0; padding: 0;" class="plainlinks"| | ||
Line 27: | Line 37: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== |
== Excluding the WP:SANDBOX from SineBot == | ||
See . Edits in the ] don't have to be signed. {{smiley}} ] (]) 08:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== SineBot down? == | |||
Can you please tell me why you have lifted the protection on the Feng Shui page? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->--] (]) 20:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:It was originally protected due to an edit war, which has since seemed to have died down. Per ], the protection was removed. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 20:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
I wondered why a comment on my user talk hadn't been signed by the bot, and I see it last edited on November 2. Little bot, we miss you ... ] (]) 03:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
:Belated, but it should be back; I updated it to use a better notification gateway for when it's down, too. Cheers =) --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 11:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
The only reason the edit war stopped was because of the protection. If you read the discussion board you will see that there is no consensus on this page. Removing the protection without consensus will only lead to more problems. I would request that you review the discussion page and put this page back under protection until consensus is reached. Thank you. --] (]) 05:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)--] (]) 05:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:You're welcome to ], but they'll probably tell you the same thing I have. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 15:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== Invisible Ink and Scantegrity II == | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
Why did you remove the reference to Scantegrity II from ]? ] (]) 02:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:It's ] (link was a primary source), ] (it fails ]), and quite possibly a ]. Same goes for ], which was deleted per ]. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 04:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I'm fairly certain that the primary source was in fact reliable, being published in a peer-reviewed journal by highly reputable authors, and that the article was not interpretive. Another editor added a link to the missing article in ], so I felt there was a need. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:::It appears to be a press release made to look like a journal article. If it isn't, however, simply ] the reference to the article in the journal. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 05:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::This thing is an academic project, and I don't see why pointing to copies of articles on the author's website counts as an advert. It even says "This paper will appear in the proceedings of USENIX/ACCURATE EVT 2008." As abstracts are meant to be advertisements for the paper I can see how you could have thought it was an advertisement, but how hard is it to google "Scantegrity USENIX"? ] (]) 14:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I think this work meets the self-published sources exclusion, see ], ], and ]. It is obvious that these authors are experts in the field of Computer Science, not to mention it was never in violation to begin with. I still wish to know why posting a copy of a published work on your website counts as spam/self-sourcing/etc.. Could you undelete/give the text to the Scantegrity articles? I have the feeling five minutes of finding the original source links and changing the feel for some of the language would satisfy your objections.. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
::# It was written like an advertisement (see also ] and ]). | |||
::# You a ]. | |||
::# One paper does not satisfy our ] to have its own article. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 14:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Re the advert, I guess you're talking about the article (which I haven't seen because it was deleted). Fair enough. I have found numerous references through a quick google search (IEEE, USENIX, RangeVoting.org, MSNBC, MIT Technology Review, NPR, etc). What is the minimum number of references required? I think the language can be changed, we can add these references, and you will be satisfied. I do not understand the COI (i've read the whole COI page twice now). Could you elaborate on why you believe I have a COI? I don't think we should remove reliable sources illustrating the practical use of a technology. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:::Re COI, I'm not aware of any plans to commercialize the system, I would not stand to gain from its adoption, and I have no personal relationship with the authors. Re advertising, I still don't see it (let alone blatant), but I guess that's subjective; I tried to pattern the article after ] and ]. I'll concede that notability is a possible concern for now, as the paper is less than a month old. ] (]) 16:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
I propose that while we're waiting to establish the notability of Scantegrity II as a separate topic, we restore the original reference to it in ], complete with the original journal citation. Agreed? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Which already happened, I just noticed. Doh! ] (]) 21:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Slakr, can you help me by pointing out a couple of biased statements in the deleted article? Thanks! ] (]) 17:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:You know how a brochure reads? That's basically the tone of the whole article. One of the best examples is, "Because Scantegrity II differs from a traditional optical scan voting system only in the type of ink used and in the addition of optional steps, it retains the familiar integrity properties." In fact, that sentence, alone, basically sums up why it likely fails ]: it's best placed in a section of the main article— if it's to be included at all. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 19:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for your input. I agree that this statement does not belong. Can you give me any actionable advice on how to neutralize the overall tone? I'm having some difficulty distinguishing the tone from that of ], for example. Thanks! ] (]) 23:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
== Thank you. == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
Hi Slakr. Thank you for unblocking me. Why did the shows that I was unblocked at 03:03:56 when I wasn't? --''Regards, ] (])'' 16:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:The second block was an ] on your IP address, so while your normal block was removed, the autoblock (essentially, a second block automatically added by mediawiki) on your IP address was still in effect. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 19:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== Thanks and a Little Help == | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
Just wanted to thank you for upping the protection level on ] again but I seem to be having a problem of my own. Someone editing from http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/41.245.171.32 went and put a sock puppet thing on both my and http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:COOLRUNNER87 talk pages. It's one of the vandals from that page trying to get revenge or whatever, it's really stupid. I removed it from both of our pages but wasn't sure if that was ok or not. It's obvious that neither one of us are sock puppets of the guy who keeps doing the vandalism since we always revert it. Just thought I'd run this by you since you dealt with the first page. It really is pretty stupid all around. ] (]) 19:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
:That's ok. It's pretty obvious it was done in bad faith by the user, and no SSP case was opened. :P --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 19:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 04:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
== User requesting unblock who is affected by your rangeblock == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
See ]. He may have been hit by a that you placed. You may want to comment on his User talk. I did not want to give him any advice without consulting you first. Thanks, ] (]) 18:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== (un)Blocking of Opera Mini servers == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
Hi! | |||
</div> | |||
I work for Opera Software as system administrator for Opera Mini. | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
I understand you have blocked users from Opera Mini server IPs from editing Misplaced Pages due to abuse. | |||
To address this issue, I've now had our IP ranges added to the XFF project (we were already forwarding the x-forwarded-for header). | |||
The Opera Mini Demo application specifically mentioned in your block will have a unique IP in it's x-forwarded-for header, and can be permanently blacklisted. It's not intended for regular use, only as a test-drive of the product. | |||
I have verified that the addresses are listed in http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/trusted-xff.txt. | |||
But still, I get blocked from some of our IPs, but not others. Are only parts or the ranges blocked, or are not all Misplaced Pages servers using the same configuration? | |||
Please contact me (kronberg (at) opera.com) to resolve this as soon as possible, or direct me to someone who can help. Since these servers are not normal web proxies, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to go through the normal process for unblocking an open proxy. | |||
Regards, | |||
//Mats | |||
] (]) 18:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Cool. I'll drop you an email in a second, but I figured I'd reply here just in case. Since it looks like you've placed the demo on 195.189.142.176, and Ryulong has already blocked that one; and, on top of that, all of the XFF stuff is in place now, I've now unblocked 195.189.142.0/23 and 91.203.96.0/22. Those were the two ranges that I think I was originally able to proxy through using the demo. Anyway, thanks a million for your help, and keep up the great work. :) Cheers. =) --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 22:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hey slakr, can you please lock ]'s profile because IP users vandalized his profile to avoid ruining. | |||
I found the page history of his profile which they were a vandalism pages:<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:It doesn't appear to be excessive enough to warrant automatic semi protection for the time being, though the user is free to ] as per our ]. --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 02:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Sorry, it declined to semi-protect Aleenf1's profile. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Keenyah Hill == | |||
== SineBot signing my <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>-signed comments == | |||
Hi Slakr, Can you please lock the page of Keenyah Hill (] third placer) for full-protection to recreate the article again. Which it was ] back in November 2006. --] (]) 15:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
For example, . What's going on? | |||
== Sinebot mis-sign == | |||
] 00:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Just thought I'd let you know that ] signed a message on an AFD vote I made, which had a date and a link to my userpage. Here is my signature: | |||
— {{tnull|SUBST:User|Byeitical}} | |||
Diff: — ] (] '''·''' ]) 17:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:56, 13 January 2025
slakr's life is currently frolicking with chaos, so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance— that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =) zOMG!!! I need urgent assistance!!!1!! — banana? — kiwi? |
- Ideally, please use this link to post new messages at the bottom. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :)
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Click here to start a new talk topic
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | |
Regarding slakr: Why did my page get deleted? Please see Misplaced Pages:Why was my page deleted? first. I have no idea what you're talking about. What's vandalism? If you received a warning from me and you're not logged in, you might have gotten an old warning I sent to someone who shares your IP address. On the other hand, if you've made recent edits and received a recent warning message from me and you genuinely believe that it's not vandalism, don't fret-- simply drop me a message below, because I could have simply made a silly mistake. :)Regarding SineBot: Why does SineBot keep signing stuff I've already signed? All comments should have a signature that includes both a link to your user page (slakr) and a datestamp (05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)) (per signatures - internal links). This is most easily generated by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your contributions, which makes something like "slakr 05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)".If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing. If you're still having problems after trying that, post a message below. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. I don't want my comments signed by SineBot. How do I get it to ignore me or my talk page? Please use one of the opt-out methods listed on its user page. SineBot forgot to sign something it should have signed. Usually this happens because the bot isn't sure if it really should sign something, so it defaults to not signing it (e.g., in cases of complex edits). It does this to avoid being annoying. Other times, a comment might be made when the bot is down for maintenance, so the bot simply never sees it. SineBot signed something that it genuinely should not have signed. Please let me know-- especially if you think it's not a one-time thing. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. Is SineBot's source code available? Not currently. I'm signing with four tildes (~~~~) but it's still saying I didn't! You likely enabled raw signatures. Open your preferences, click the "User profile" tab, make sure that "Treat the above as wiki markup" is NOT checked, and click Save; it should be fixed. If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Excluding the WP:SANDBOX from SineBot
See here. Edits in the WP:SANDBOX don't have to be signed. Polygnotus (talk) 08:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
SineBot down?
I wondered why a comment on my user talk hadn't been signed by the bot, and I see it last edited on November 2. Little bot, we miss you ... Yngvadottir (talk) 03:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Belated, but it should be back; I updated it to use a better notification gateway for when it's down, too. Cheers =) --slakr 11:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Sean Spicer
Template:Editnotices/Page/Sean Spicer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
SineBot signing my ~~~~-signed comments
For example, here. What's going on?
--ΝΗΜΙΝΥΛΙ 00:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Νημινυλι (talk • contribs)