| Revision as of 21:36, 4 November 2024 editGraywalls (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,766 edits →Cities lists merge proposal: cmtTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:51, 13 January 2025 edit undoAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers639,061 edits →Strike stub: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| {{shortcut|WT:OREGON|WT:ORE}} | {{shortcut|WT:OREGON|WT:ORE}} | ||
| == |
== Request article assessment == | ||
| ⚫ | Teammates, can I get experienced Wiki-Oregon editors to assess new ] article? Prigg was pioneer physician and pharmacist in 1840s. He opened the first commercial drug store in the Oregon County. He also served as Secretary for the Provisional Government of Oregon, a position that eventually became the Oregon Secretary of State … our second highest state office today. The article’s DYK nomination is approved so hook will be published on Misplaced Pages’s main page sometime soon ... not sure when. I’d really like someone from WikiProject Oregon to do assessment before DYK appears on main page. Thanks! ] (]) 18:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Cities lists merge proposal == | ||
| We have a new bio on ], who became known as Oregon's "unofficial ambassador", courtesy of {{u|Goldfish-silverfish}}. I think the article could be a candidate for DYK if any other editors are interested in looking it over. – ] (]) 18:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | I'm avoiding my GIS homework by poking my nose in here: ]. Does anybody think we still need two articles or are we just being stubborn? I haven't looked at either to see what they even look like now. Is there a valid objection besides ]? Is there a reason to keep besides Valfontis ]? @]? @]? Cheers, ] (]) 05:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == FPC == | |||
| ⚫ | :Oregon seems to be the only state that has a combined list like this. While an index is useful, it is probably more confusing for readers than just maintaining the existing ] and ]. The cities list definitely needs to stay separate to match with the other 49 states, while the unincorporated places can have their own list similar to ]. ''']]''' 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * ] | |||
| ⚫ | ::Oregon is doing the ''right thing'' by combining carrots and potatoes and calling them all vegetables. The cities which have not combined them are not doing the reader a favor. It makes them have to look in two places instead of one. They are more likely to be surprised by the arbitrarily imposed distinction. —] (]) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * ] | |||
| ⚫ | :::Incorporation is an important distinction, as it (at least in the Northwest; other states are weird) determines whether you have another layer of government and what services you can receive. An unincorporated community is under direct county rule and has limited representation and independence. Incorporated cities and towns have firm names and recorded histories; unincorporated communities may have been named by the Census Bureau (in the case of CDPs) or have no real name, and hardly enough history to warrant an article under GNG. An equivalent to ] (a better name for the combined list) would be an appropriate thing to have for all states as a ''supplement'' to the lists that are separated by incorporated/unincorporated status. ''']]''' 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Somewhat related, but I feel like something like ] ought to not have an article of its own. It probably doesn't meet NGEO. ] (]) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| Now, I don't want to canvass votes, so please only vote if you would likely have done so anyway, but just to let everyone here know, ] is up at featured pictures, and looks very likely to pass (it's already at quorum). Used in a number of Portland-related articles; photographer doesn't appear to have an article, though I suspect he could if people wanted to dig into enough non-online sources. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup><sub>Has about 8.8% of all ].</sub></span> 20:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the pointer. It's nice to know what's going on, I don't see it as a canvass. ] (]) 22:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I just think it's better to be explicit on such things. Better over-cautious than under-cautious, after all. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup><sub>Has about 8.8% of all ].</sub></span> 18:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::For the record, it passed and is now a featured picture. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup><sub>Has about 8.8% of all ].</sub></span> 14:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :There's been some pushback against having articles about small communities and quite a bit of damage (and no cleanup afterward, usually) has been done by folks not doing ]. (I don't necessarily agree with the current state of NGEO, but that's what we have right now.) Have you done any checking? Kansas City might be notable. I'll do my usual recon and try to spruce it up. ] (]) 20:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Photo request == | |||
| == anyone feel like smiling? == | |||
| Greetings. If you live in or near ], I would appreciate a photograph of one (or both) of these restaurants: ] and ]. Please snap photos of the building and (if necessary) a dish. Thanks in advance, ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 22:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{Multiple image| | |||
| | image1 = Smiley Face Forest 1.jpg | |||
| | image2 = Smiley Face Forest 2.jpg | |||
| | footer = Hampton Lumber's smiley face forest in fall foliage, near Willamina Oregon | |||
| }} | |||
| Perfect time of year for the forest. It might actually stand up as an article given the number of press mentions. Or create something for Hampton Lumber, which is . ] (]) 00:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| :{{Camera}} ''']''', too! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 16:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Camera}} + ''']''' ---] <sub>(])</sub> 16:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :All, I have addressed the lack of more recent news and other clean-up items, but if someone could do a copy edit to clean anything up, that would be appreciated. ] (]) 05:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've done some clean up on the citations, but the text could still use a once-over. ] (]) 06:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Would like help from a relative local to Portland == | |||
| == Pioneer Courthouse Square Christmas tree == | |||
| Discussion at ] new user from the David Campbell Memorial Association trying to change the name of the article in a crude editing way. I'm 3000 miles away, maybe a local might bring something to the discussion.] (]) 23:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Feeling a bit ]-ish? Welcoming collaboration at ], for anyone who is interested. Happy editing! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 17:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Naraht}} Thanks for bringing this up and engaging with the new editor. The article has seen some improvement following discussion on the talk page. ] (]) 22:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{U|Lord Bolingbroke}} Thanx. I wasn't really in a situation to do a deep dive, just trying to keep him out of *very* NNPOV and COI edits. Hopefully, we can build from those and similar references to get something he'll live with. He did have some points, we'll see how it goes.] (]) 22:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :Found this ''Oregonian'' piece with , at least one with the tree in the background. Maybe an ext. link? ] (]) 19:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::There's a lot of holiday-related programming at the square, but I am trying to keep this entry specific to the tree and affiliated festivities, such as the tree arrival parades and lighting ceremonies. I feel good about coverage of the 2000s to present, based on Google and Google News searches, but the ''Oregonian'' archives may be needed for a bit more detail about the 1980s and 1990s. ---] <sub>(])</sub> 16:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Oh Lord, this is longer than the Good Book. Please edit this down and find good sources! ] (]) 02:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Seeking collaboration and GA co-nomination == | |||
| ⚫ | :@] I removed the unsourced wall of text. Yikes! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 15:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| Here's a short list of some articles I've worked on that could use a bit of polishing before a Good article nomination. I'm down to collaborate and co-nominate, if you see one that interests you: | |||
| == Strike stub == | |||
| {{Div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
| * {{icon|GAN}} <s>]</s> | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * {{icon|GA}} <s>]</s> | |||
| * {{icon|GA}} <s>]</s> | |||
| * {{icon|GAN}} <s>]</s> | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| {{Div col end}} | |||
| Just lemme know here or on the article's talk page. Thanks! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 14:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Requesting feedback regarding ] == | |||
| There's an ongoing disagreement over at ] about an expansion of the article, which includes information about a bizarre protest/publicity stunt against Garth Brooks at the store and its role in the eventual formation of Record Store Day. Another editor is evidently determined to remove this content, but has yet to provide any valid reasons why. ] (]) 13:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Request article assessment == | |||
| ⚫ | Teammates, can I get experienced Wiki-Oregon editors to assess new ] article? Prigg was pioneer physician and pharmacist in 1840s. He opened the first commercial drug store in the Oregon County. He also served as Secretary for the Provisional Government of Oregon, a position that eventually became the Oregon Secretary of State … our second highest state office today. The article’s DYK nomination is approved so hook will be published on Misplaced Pages’s main page sometime soon ... not sure when. I’d really like someone from WikiProject Oregon to do assessment before DYK appears on main page. Thanks! ] (]) 18:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Cities lists merge proposal == | ||
| ⚫ | I'm avoiding my GIS homework by poking my nose in here: ]. Does anybody think we still need two articles or are we just being stubborn? I haven't looked at either to see what they even look like now. Is there a valid objection besides ]? Is there a reason to keep besides Valfontis ]? @]? @]? Cheers, ] (]) 05:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | :Oregon seems to be the only state that has a combined list like this. While an index is useful, it is probably more confusing for readers than just maintaining the existing ] and ]. The cities list definitely needs to stay separate to match with the other 49 states, while the unincorporated places can have their own list similar to ]. ''']]''' 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ::Oregon is doing the ''right thing'' by combining carrots and potatoes and calling them all vegetables. The cities which have not combined them are not doing the reader a favor. It makes them have to look in two places instead of one. They are more likely to be surprised by the arbitrarily imposed distinction. —] (]) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | :::Incorporation is an important distinction, as it (at least in the Northwest; other states are weird) determines whether you have another layer of government and what services you can receive. An unincorporated community is under direct county rule and has limited representation and independence. Incorporated cities and towns have firm names and recorded histories; unincorporated communities may have been named by the Census Bureau (in the case of CDPs) or have no real name, and hardly enough history to warrant an article under GNG. An equivalent to ] (a better name for the combined list) would be an appropriate thing to have for all states as a ''supplement'' to the lists that are separated by incorporated/unincorporated status. ''']]''' 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Somewhat related, but I feel like something like ] ought to not have an article of its own. It probably doesn't meet NGEO. ] (]) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * ] | |||
| == Chamber Music Northwest == | |||
| ---] <sub>(])</sub> 14:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:51, 13 January 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Oregon and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32Auto-archiving period: 45 days  |
 | WikiProject Oregon was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 15 August 2011. |
 
|
||
Shortcuts
Request article assessment
Teammates, can I get experienced Wiki-Oregon editors to assess new Frederick Prigg article? Prigg was pioneer physician and pharmacist in 1840s. He opened the first commercial drug store in the Oregon County. He also served as Secretary for the Provisional Government of Oregon, a position that eventually became the Oregon Secretary of State … our second highest state office today. The article’s DYK nomination is approved so hook will be published on Misplaced Pages’s main page sometime soon ... not sure when. I’d really like someone from WikiProject Oregon to do assessment before DYK appears on main page. Thanks! Orygun (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Cities lists merge proposal
I'm avoiding my GIS homework by poking my nose in here: Talk:List of cities in Oregon#Proposed merge of List of cities and unincorporated communities in Oregon with List of cities in Oregon. Does anybody think we still need two articles or are we just being stubborn? I haven't looked at either to see what they even look like now. Is there a valid objection besides WP:IDON'TLIKEIT? Is there a reason to keep besides Valfontis likes it? @Ipoellet? @EncMstr? Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 05:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oregon seems to be the only state that has a combined list like this. While an index is useful, it is probably more confusing for readers than just maintaining the existing cities list and CDP list. The cities list definitely needs to stay separate to match with the other 49 states, while the unincorporated places can have their own list similar to Washington's. SounderBruce 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oregon is doing the right thing by combining carrots and potatoes and calling them all vegetables. The cities which have not combined them are not doing the reader a favor. It makes them have to look in two places instead of one. They are more likely to be surprised by the arbitrarily imposed distinction. —EncMstr (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Incorporation is an important distinction, as it (at least in the Northwest; other states are weird) determines whether you have another layer of government and what services you can receive. An unincorporated community is under direct county rule and has limited representation and independence. Incorporated cities and towns have firm names and recorded histories; unincorporated communities may have been named by the Census Bureau (in the case of CDPs) or have no real name, and hardly enough history to warrant an article under GNG. An equivalent to List of populated places in Oregon (a better name for the combined list) would be an appropriate thing to have for all states as a supplement to the lists that are separated by incorporated/unincorporated status. SounderBruce 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oregon is doing the right thing by combining carrots and potatoes and calling them all vegetables. The cities which have not combined them are not doing the reader a favor. It makes them have to look in two places instead of one. They are more likely to be surprised by the arbitrarily imposed distinction. —EncMstr (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Somewhat related, but I feel like something like Kansas City, Oregon ought to not have an article of its own. It probably doesn't meet NGEO. Graywalls (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- There's been some pushback against having articles about small communities and quite a bit of damage (and no cleanup afterward, usually) has been done by folks not doing WP:BEFORE. (I don't necessarily agree with the current state of NGEO, but that's what we have right now.) Have you done any checking? Kansas City might be notable. I'll do my usual recon and try to spruce it up. Valfontis (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
anyone feel like smiling?
Hampton Lumber's smiley face forest in fall foliage, near Willamina Oregon
Perfect time of year for the forest. It might actually stand up as an article given the number of press mentions. Or create something for Hampton Lumber, which is part of a few historic railways that have articles. tedder (talk) 00:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wilsonville, Oregon
Wilsonville, Oregon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- All, I have addressed the lack of more recent news and other clean-up items, but if someone could do a copy edit to clean anything up, that would be appreciated. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've done some clean up on the citations, but the text could still use a once-over. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Would like help from a relative local to Portland
Discussion at Talk:Portland Firefighters Park new user from the David Campbell Memorial Association trying to change the name of the article in a crude editing way. I'm 3000 miles away, maybe a local might bring something to the discussion.Naraht (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Naraht: Thanks for bringing this up and engaging with the new editor. The article has seen some improvement following discussion on the talk page. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lord Bolingbroke Thanx. I wasn't really in a situation to do a deep dive, just trying to keep him out of *very* NNPOV and COI edits. Hopefully, we can build from those and similar references to get something he'll live with. He did have some points, we'll see how it goes.Naraht (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
History of Oregon State Beavers football
Oh Lord, this is longer than the Good Book. Please edit this down and find good sources! Bearian (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Bearian I removed the unsourced wall of text. Yikes! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)