Misplaced Pages

New Coimbra Fort: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:38, 30 December 2024 editCoeusin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:08, 13 January 2025 edit undoCoeusin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 editsm rm probably misplaced data 
(27 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
| pushpin_map_caption = Location of the New Coimbra Fort in Brazil | pushpin_map_caption = Location of the New Coimbra Fort in Brazil
| pushpin_label = New Coimbra Fort | pushpin_label = New Coimbra Fort
|site_area= |site_area =
|type=] |type = ]
|built={{Start date|1775}} |built = {{Start date|1775}}
|materials= |materials =
|used= |used =
|controlledby=] |controlledby = ]
|garrison= |garrison =
|ownership= |ownership =
|condition= |condition =
|website= |website = {{URL|http://ebacervo.eb.mil.br/items/show/217}}
|footnotes = {{designation list|embed = yes| designation1 = Brazil| designation1_date = 1974|designation1_number =917-T-1974}}
}} }}


Line 29: Line 30:
Brazil's western central region, ], had been explored since the early 18th century by ] from ] and ] missionaries from land which belongs to Paraguay nowadays. The border between the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires in the region needed to be marked, and the Portuguese solution was the New Coimbra Fort, to be built along the lines of the Spanish ] of the time. Brazil's western central region, ], had been explored since the early 18th century by ] from ] and ] missionaries from land which belongs to Paraguay nowadays. The border between the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires in the region needed to be marked, and the Portuguese solution was the New Coimbra Fort, to be built along the lines of the Spanish ] of the time.


When the first colonial captain-general to the region, ], arrived in 1751, he started to build up an administration, and to consolidate plans for defense and further expansion; by 1772, when the captaincy's fourth governor, {{ill|Luís de Albuquerque de Melo Pereira e Cáceres|lt=Luís Pereira e Cáceres|pt|Luís de Albuquerque de Melo Pereira e Cáceres}}, arrived to take power, these were already somewhat established. He soon determined that the planned fort in the Paraguay River be built. Besides the previously planned border demarcation purpose, it would also serve to inhibit the frequent raids by the ] and ] indians.<ref name= revista/> Captain Matias Ribeiro da Costa was sent to accomplish this task, with instructions to build the fort somewhere near where the settlement of ] is located today, some 300 kilometers further downriver than where the fort was actually built (the expedition made a mistake).<ref name= revista>{{cite journal|author=<!--not stated-->|year=2001|title=Forte de Coimbra|volume=1|issue=2|journal=DaCultura|publisher=Fundação Cultural do Estado da Bahia|url=https://www.funceb.org.br/images/revista/_4y1k.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101010053437/https://www.funceb.org.br/images/revista/_4y1k.pdf|archive-date=10 October 2010|language=pt}}</ref> The captain's expedition was made up of 245 men in 15 canoes, guided by an elderly indian man. They set off from ] in 22 July 1775, and founded the fort in September 13 of the same year. It was called the "Presídio de Coimbra". When the first colonial captain-general to the region, ], arrived in 1751, he started to build up an administration, and to consolidate plans for defense and further expansion; by 1772, when the captaincy's fourth governor, {{ill|Luís de Albuquerque de Melo Pereira e Cáceres|lt=Luís Pereira e Cáceres|pt|Luís de Albuquerque de Melo Pereira e Cáceres}}, arrived to take power, these were already somewhat established. He soon determined that the planned fort in the ] be built. Besides the previously planned border demarcation purpose, it would also serve to inhibit the frequent raids by the ] and ] indians.<ref name= revista/> Captain Matias Ribeiro da Costa was sent to accomplish this task, with instructions to build the fort somewhere near where the settlement of ] is located today, some 300 kilometers further downriver than where the fort was actually built (the expedition made a mistake).<ref name= revista>{{cite journal|author=<!--not stated-->|year=2001|title=Forte de Coimbra|volume=1|issue=2|journal=DaCultura|publisher=Fundação Cultural do Estado da Bahia|url=https://www.funceb.org.br/images/revista/_4y1k.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101010053437/https://www.funceb.org.br/images/revista/_4y1k.pdf|archive-date=10 October 2010|language=pt}}</ref><ref name=Bento/> The captain's expedition was made up of 245 men in 15 canoes, guided by an elderly indian man.<ref name=Bento>{{cite journal|last=Bento|first=Cláudio|title=FORTE DE COIMBRA: DOIS SÉCULOS DE HISTÓRIA, DE FÉ E DE GLÓRIAS|journal=Revista da Academia de História Militar Terrestre do Brasil|publisher=Academia de História Militar Terrestre do Brasil |url=http://www.ahimtb.org.br/FORTE%20DE%20COIMBRA%202%20S%C3%89CULOS%20DE%20F%C3%89%20E%20GL%C3%93RIAS.pdf|language=pt}}</ref> They set off from ] on 22 July 1775, and founded the fort on 13 September of the same year. It was called the "Presídio de Coimbra". The place where the fort lies was previously called St. Francis's Narrows, because the Paraguay River became narrower there.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/contraponto/article/view/3746/2157 |title=A invasão paraguaia do sul do Mato Grosso |date=2015 |last=Maestri |first=Mário |volume=4 |issue=2 |journal=Revista Contraponto |issn=2236-6822}}</ref>


=== The New Coimbra Fort === === The New Coimbra Fort ===
In 1791, due to the bad state of the fort's structure, works were started to renew it, this time using masonry.{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 160}} This was also in part motivated to the Spanish having built Forts ] and of {{ill|Fort San Carlos del Apa|lt=San Carlos del Apa|es|Fuerte de San Carlos del Apa}} in the region. Then captain-general {{ill|Caetano Pinto de Miranda Montenegro|lt=Caetano Montenegro|pt|Caetano Pinto de Miranda Montenegro}} ordered it to be built "in the edge of the hill, where two great lengths of the Paraguay River present themselves at an obtuse angle, which will be then flanked by the new fort, something the old base wouldn't do."{{efn|This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads "na ponta do morro, onde fazem um grande ângulo obtuso dois compridos estirões do Paraguai, que ficarão flanqueados pelo novo forte, o que não faria a antiga estacada."}}{{sfn|Souza|1885|p= 134}} In 1791, due to the bad state of the fort's structure, which had been damaged by a fire<ref name=Bento/> and Kadiwéu attacks,{{sfn|Sousa|1885|p= 134}} works were started to renew it, this time using masonry.{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 160}} This was also in part motivated by the Spanish building Forts ] and of ] in the region. Then captain-general {{ill|Caetano Pinto de Miranda Montenegro|lt=Caetano Montenegro|pt|Caetano Pinto de Miranda Montenegro}} ordered it to be built "in the edge of the hill, where two great lengths of the Paraguay River present themselves at an obtuse angle, which will be then flanked by the new fort, something the old base wouldn't do."{{efn|This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads "na ponta do morro, onde fazem um grande ângulo obtuso dois compridos estirões do Paraguai, que ficarão flanqueados pelo novo forte, o que não faria a antiga estacada."}}{{sfn|Sousa|1885|p= 134}}


From 1796 onwards, lieutenant colonel {{ill|Ricardo Franco de Almeida Serra|lt=Ricardo Serra|pt|Ricardo Franco de Almeida Serra}}, a military engineer and geographer, took charge of the construction.{{sfn|Barreto|1958}} for the fort show the original base besides the new one, which was adapted to its terrain, an irregular ]. Its walls had ] and surrounded the entire fort, meeting its hill's slope as it declined. It had room for two batteries of 8 guns set horizontally, which could fire across each other onto the river. To the southeast, a moat protected the fort from ground assaults. Inside the fort, there was a chapel, an arsenal and quarters for its troops. Ricardo Serra would command the fort until 1806; he was buried in it after his death in 1809.{{sfn|Souza|1885|p= 134-135}}<ref name= revista/> From 1796 onwards, lieutenant colonel {{ill|Ricardo Franco de Almeida Serra|lt=Ricardo Serra|pt|Ricardo Franco de Almeida Serra}}, a military engineer and geographer, took charge of the construction.{{sfn|Barreto|1958}} for the fort show the original base besides the new one, which was adapted to its terrain, an irregular ]. Its walls had ] and surrounded the entire fort, meeting its hill's slope as it declined. It had room for two batteries of 8 guns set horizontally, which could fire across each other onto the river. To the southeast, a moat protected the fort from ground assaults. Inside the fort, there was a chapel, an arsenal and quarters for its troops. Ricardo Serra would command the fort until 1806; he was buried in it after his death in 1809.{{sfn|Sousa|1885|p= 134-135}}<ref name= revista/>


In September 1801, the new fort was still being built when an expedition composed of four schooners and two canoes, carrying 600 men, attacked it; they were led by {{ill|Lázaro de Ribera y Espinoza|lt=Lázaro de Ribeira|es|Lázaro de Ribera y Espinoza}}, the ]. The fort encroached on Spanish land, as established in the Treaty of Madrid.<ref name= revista/> Though it was garrisoned by only 42 men, it resisted the initial assault and then a 10-day siege, after which the Paraguayans withdrew due to the lack of supplies and storm damage on the ships.<ref name= revista/> In September 1801, the new fort was still being built when an expedition composed of four schooners and two canoes, carrying 600 men, attacked it; they were led by {{ill|Lázaro de Ribera y Espinoza|lt=Lázaro de Ribeira|es|Lázaro de Ribera y Espinoza}}, the ]. The fort encroached on Spanish land, as established in the Treaty of Madrid, and news of peace in the ] hadn't yet reached the region.{{sfn|Corrêa Filho|1925|p= 136-143}}<ref name= revista/> The Brazilians had been previously warned by the now friendly Kadiwéu indians of the expedition's existence,<ref name=Bento/> and, though the fort was garrisoned by only 42 men, it resisted the initial assault and then a 10-day siege, after which the Paraguayans withdrew due to the lack of supplies and storm damage on the ships.<ref name= revista/> Throughout the action, the Paraguayans lost 20 men.{{sfn|Corrêa Filho|1925|p= 146}}


In 1851 the fort's weaponry was improved by the addition of four 24-pounder guns and some smaller 9 and 6 pounder guns which had laid since 1820 in the ], planned to be installed at the ] further north. It was expanded and repaired between 1855 and 1856.{{sfn|Sousa|1885|p= 134-135}} In 1855, Mato Grosso's government was briefly transferred to the fort by then-provincial president ] amidst tensions with Paraguay.<ref name=Bento/>
=== The Paraguayan War ===
In 1851 the fort's weaponry was improved by the addition of four 24-pounder guns and some smaller 9 and 6 pounder guns which had laid since 1820 in the ], planned to be installed at the ] further north. It was expanded and repaired between 1855 and 1856.{{sfn|Souza|1885|p= 134-135}}


Just before the ], the fort's status was reported to the provincial president as follows: "In the 30th of the last month I arrived here from Fort Coimbra, to where I led the province's artillery battalion. Your Excellency will probably have received a memorandum regarding that Fort's condition, as well as other measures taken by the Hon. Sir Commander of Arms, who returned with me that same day.; I must tell Your Excellency, nevertheless, that said Fort's state is unsatisfactory, but that it can resist Paraguay's ships and maybe defend itself from land attacks. The Hon. Sir Commander of Arms has ordered some improvements and repairs be made which he understands will be advantageous, and he plans to fortify the Navy's old position in front of the Fort, so that they may fire across from each other and aid each other."{{sfn|Maia|1964|p= 37}}{{efn|This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads: "A 30 do mês findo cheguei aqui de volta do Forte de Coimbra, para onde fui conduzindo o batalhão de artilharia da província. Provavelmente V. Exa. terá recebido uma participação circunstanciada do estado daquele forte, assim como de outras diligências procedidas pelo exmo. Sr. Comandante das Armas, que comigo regressou no mesmo dia; todavia direi à V. Exa. que não é satisfatório o estado do dito forte, contudo pode resistir aos navios do Paraguai e defender-se talvez de seus ataques por terra. O exmo. sr. Comandante das Armas determinou alguns melhoramentos e serviços que entende serão de vantagem, e pretende fortificar a antiga posição da Marinha em frente ao mesmo forte, de modo que, cruzando os fogos, se auxiliem mutuamente."}} Just before the ], the fort's status was reported to the provincial president as follows: "In the 30th of the last month I arrived here from Fort Coimbra, to where I led the province's artillery battalion. Your Excellency will probably have received a memorandum regarding that Fort's condition, as well as other measures taken by the Hon. Sir Commander of Arms, who returned with me that same day; I must tell Your Excellency, nevertheless, that said Fort's state is unsatisfactory, but that it can resist Paraguay's ships and maybe defend itself from land attacks. The Hon. Sir Commander of Arms has ordered some improvements and repairs be made which he understands will be advantageous, and he plans to fortify the Navy's old position in front of the Fort, so that they may fire across from each other and aid each other."{{sfn|Guimarães|1964|p= 37}}{{efn|This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads: "A 30 do mês findo cheguei aqui de volta do Forte de Coimbra, para onde fui conduzindo o batalhão de artilharia da província. Provavelmente V. Exa. terá recebido uma participação circunstanciada do estado daquele forte, assim como de outras diligências procedidas pelo exmo. Sr. Comandante das Armas, que comigo regressou no mesmo dia; todavia direi à V. Exa. que não é satisfatório o estado do dito forte, contudo pode resistir aos navios do Paraguai e defender-se talvez de seus ataques por terra. O exmo. sr. Comandante das Armas determinou alguns melhoramentos e serviços que entende serão de vantagem, e pretende fortificar a antiga posição da Marinha em frente ao mesmo forte, de modo que, cruzando os fogos, se auxiliem mutuamente."}}


=== The Paraguayan War ===
]
{{Infobox military conflict
|conflict = Battle of Fort Novo de Coimbra
|partof = the ]
|image = El asalto y toma de Coimbra.jpg
|image_size = 300
|caption = Paraguayan drawing published in '']'', depicting cannons firing on the fort and the Brazilian withdrawal
|date = 27 December 1864 - 29 December 1864
|place = New Coimbra Fort
|result = Paraguayan victory
|combatant1 = {{flag|Empire of Brazil}}
|combatant2 = {{flag|Paraguay|1842}}
|commander1 = {{flagicon|Empire of Brazil}} ]
|commander2 = {{flagicon|Paraguay|1842}} ]
|strength1 = {{plainlist |
*125 regulars
*65 irregulars
*11 guns
*]
}}
|strength2 = {{plainlist |
*3,200 soldiers
*12 guns
*11 warships
}}
|casualties1 = None
|casualties2 = 200 casualties
|campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Paraguayan War}}
}}


The Paraguayan invasion, the opening move of the ], was made of five infantry batallions and two dismounted cavalry regiments, totalling 3200 men, with twelve rifled guns, a French-equipped rocket battery and the support of 11 warships, all under colonel ]'s command. The fort's surrender was demanded on the 27th of December 1864.<ref name= revista/> The Paraguayan invasion, the opening move of the ], was made of five infantry batallions and two dismounted cavalry regiments, totalling 3200 men, with twelve rifled guns, a French-equipped rocket battery and the support of 11 warships, all under colonel ]'s command. The fort's surrender was demanded on 27 December 1864.<ref name= revista/>


Though the fort's commander was captain Benito de Faria, lieutenant colonel ], commander of all artillery in Mato Grosso and of the Lower Paraguay Military District happened to be there on a routine inspection, and took over its command due to the Paraguayan attack. He replied to the Paraguayan demands with a letter stating "only through luck and the honor of arms will we deliver the fort".<ref name= revista/> Though the fort's commander was captain Benito de Faria, lieutenant colonel ], commander of all artillery in Mato Grosso and of the Lower Paraguay Military District happened to be there on a routine inspection, and took over its command due to the Paraguayan attack. He replied to the Paraguayan demands with a letter stating "only through luck and the honor of arms will we deliver the fort".<ref name= revista/>


The fort then held 11 functioning bronze smoothbore guns, plus another 20 in need of repairs, and a garrison of 125 regular officers and men, 30 national guards, some custom guards, 6 prisoners and 24 "tame indians".<ref name= revista/> For two days the Paraguayans made intense attacks. The fort's troops's families aided with reloading and the wounded. Lacking the resources necessary to resist the attack and with no reinforcements available nearby, the fort was orderly evacuated between the 28th and 29th of December by the gunboat ''Anhambaí''. The fort (and its guns){{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 303}} remained under enemy control until April 1868, when the Paraguayans abandoned it, taking away its guns and stores.{{sfn|Souza|1889|p= 135}} The fort then held 11 functioning bronze smoothbore guns, plus another 20 in need of repairs, and a garrison of 125 regular officers and men, 30 national guards, some custom guards, 6 prisoners and 24 "tame indians".<ref name= revista/> For two days the Paraguayans made intense attacks. The fort's troops' families aided with reloading and the wounded. Lacking the resources necessary to resist the attack and with no reinforcements available nearby, the fort was orderly evacuated between 28 and 29 December by the gunboat '']''. During the action, the Paraguayan forces suffered circa 200 casualties from failed assaults and reconnaissance actions,{{sfn|Benítes|1919|p= 31}} and the Brazilians suffered no losses.{{sfn|Souza|1919|p= 11-12}} The fort (and its guns){{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 303}} fell under enemy control, and remained under it until April 1868, when the Paraguayans abandoned it, taking away its guns and stores.{{sfn|Sousa|1885|p= 135}}


After the war ended (in 1870), the fort began to be rebuilt.<ref name= revista/> It had suffered extensive damage during the conflict, with its walls being almost completely destroyed by Paraguayan artillery fire.{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 163}} In 1872, works to expand its west wall were started. After the war ended (in 1870), the fort began to be rebuilt.<ref name= revista/> It had suffered extensive damage during the conflict, with its walls being almost completely destroyed by Paraguayan artillery fire.{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 163}} In 1872, works to expand its west wall were started.


=== The 20th century and beyond === === The 20th century and beyond ===
Between 1907 and 1908 the fort was once again upgraded by the addition of two 120mm ]s from the ironclad ].{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 163}}{{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 303}} New quarters were built beside the fort in 1930. By then, the fort was armed with four ].{{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 302-303}}
]


The fort was listed as a heritage site by the ] in 1974.<ref name= revista/> Nowadays, the fort hosts the 3rd Frontier Company - Coimbra Fort, which is part of the 18th Frontier Infantry Brigade of the ]'s ]. In 2002, said company was designated the Portocarrero Company; in 2016, it was downsized into a platoon.{{sfn|Almeida|2019|p= 61}} The fort also has a display of historical artillery pieces, hosting the following guns:{{sfn|Almeida|2019|p= 65}}
Between 1907 and 1908 the fort was once again upgraded by the addition of two 120mm ]s from the ironclad ].{{sfn|Garrido|1940|p= 163}}{{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 303}} New quarters were built in 1930. By then, the fort was armed with four ].{{sfn|Barreto|1958|p= 302-303}}


{| class="wikitable" style="width:70%;"
The fort was listed as a heritage site by the ] in 1974.<ref name= revista/> Nowadays, the fort hosts the 3rd Frontier Company - Coimbra Fort, which is part of the 18th Frontier Infantry Brigade of the ]'s ]. In 2002, said company was designated the Portocarrero Company.
|-
! width=14%| Name
! width=20%| Image
! width=14%| Type
! width=12%| Origin
! width=10%| Quantity
! width=14%| Usage
|-
| Whitworth 32
|
| Rifled ]
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 5
| 1880-1907
|-
| ]
| ]
| Rifled muzzle loader
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 3
| 1880-1907
|-
| ]
| ]
| Light coastal defense gun
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 5
| 1884-1907
|-
| ]
| ]
| ]
| {{Flag|German Empire}}
| 2
| 1907-1940
|-
| Armstrong-Whitworth 120mm
| ]
| ]
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 2
| 1907-1940
|-
| ]
| ]
| Naval gun
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 4
| 1940-1986
|-
| ]
| ]
| Field gun
| {{Flag|United Kingdom}}
| 2
| 1986-1992
|}


== The fort's legends and traditions == == The fort's legends and traditions ==
There is a local tale that claims that when the fort was being initially built, ] passed through the region on a journey to Peru, which would have made the place holy and unsuitable for military occupation. Amongst the officers of the fort there is a tradition of devoutness to the ], and a custom of, when one of them reaches the rank of general, wherever they were serving, to send back to her shrine in the fort one of the gold stars of their ]. There is a local tale that claims that when the fort was being initially built, ] passed through its first planned site (further downriver from the actual one) on a journey to Peru, which would have made the place holy and unsuitable for military occupation.<ref name=Bento/> Amongst the officers of the fort there is a tradition of devoutness to the ], and a custom of, when one of them reaches the rank of general, no matter where they are serving, to send back to her shrine in the fort one of the gold stars of their ].

In the second day of the 1864 siege, it is said that an army musician raised an image of the Virgin of Carmel over the fort's walls and shouted "long live Our Lady of Mount Carmel", under orders from Portocarrero's wife; the Paraguayans stopped firing and started to shout "long live Our Lady". This allowed some of the fort's women to discreetly head down to the river to collect water for its defenders.<ref name=Bento/>{{sfn|Almeida|2019|p= 93}}


==Notes== ==Notes==
Line 72: Line 159:
===Sources=== ===Sources===
{{refbegin}} {{refbegin}}
*{{cite thesis |last=Almeida |first=Fábio |date=2019 |title=Fortaleza imaginária: A construção do patrimônio cultural pelos diferentes discursos sobre o Forte de Coimbra e seu contexto histórico-paisagístico |degree=MA |url=http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/ALMEIDA_Fabio-Dissertacao_Mestrado.pdf |publisher=]}}
* BARRETO, Aníbal (Cel.). ''Fortificações no Brasil (Resumo Histórico).'' Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército Editora, 1958. 368p.
* {{cite book|last=Barreto|first=Aníbal|title=Fortificações no Brasil (Resumo Histórico)|year= 1958|publisher=Biblioteca do Exército|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tg9bxgEACAAJ|language=pt}}
* CAMPESTRINI, Hildebrando; GUIMARÃES, Acyr. ''História de Mato Grosso do Sul. (5ª ed.)''. Campo Grande: Instituto Histórico e Geográfio de Mato Grosso do Sul, 2002.
* {{cite book |last=Benítes|first=Gregorio|date=1919 |title=Guerra del Paraguay: las primeras batallas contra la Triple alianza |publisher=Talleres Gráficos del Estado |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=txu.059173022945835|language=es}}
* FERRAZ, Antônio Leôncio Pereira. "Memória sobre as Fortificações de Mato Grosso". Separata da ''Revista do ]''. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1930.
* {{cite book |last=Corrêa Filho|first=Virgílio|date=1925 |title=As Raias de Mato Grosso |volume=3 |publisher=Secção d'Obras do Estado de S. Paulo |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31210010132668|language=pt}}
* GALLO, José Roberto (Arq.). ''Fortificações de Mato Grosso do Sul''. Campo Grande: 8º DR/IPHAN/FNPM/MinC Escritório Técnico/MS, mar. 1986.
* {{cite book |last=Garrido|first=Carlos M.|date=1940 |title=Subsídios para a história marítima do Brasil|volume=3 |publisher=Impr. Naval|chapter=Fortificações do Brasil |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UukkAQAAIAAJ|language=pt}}
* GARRIDO, Carlos Miguez. Fortificações do Brasil. ''Separata do Vol. III dos Subsídios para a História Marítima do Brasil.'' Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Naval, 1940.
* {{cite book|last=Guimarães|first=Jorge M.|title=A invasão do Mato Grosso|year= 1964|publisher=Biblioteca do Exército|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OOsJAQAAIAAJ|language=pt}}
* GUIMARÃES, Acyr. ''Mato Grosso do Sul - sua evolução histórica''. Campo Grande: UCDB, 2000.
* {{cite journal|last=Sousa|first=Augusto|year=1885|title=Fortificações no Brazil|volume=48|journal=Revista Trimensal do Instituto Histórico Geographico e Ethnographico do Brazil|publisher=] |url=https://archive.org/details/forticacoes_no_brazil_1885|language=pt}}
* ] (Almte.). "Apontamentos para o Diccionário Chorografico da Província do Mato Grosso". ''RIHGB''. Rio de Janeiro: Tomo XLVII, Partes I e II, 1884. p.&nbsp;307-504.
* {{cite book|last=Souza|first=Antonio F.|year=1919|title=A invasão Paraguaya em Matto-Grosso|publisher=J. Pereira Leite|url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015070298339|language=pt}}
* MAGALHÃES, Luiz Alfredo Marques. ''Rio Paraguay - da Gaíba ao Apa''. Campo Grande: Editora Alvorada, s.d..
* MAIA, Jorge. ''A invasão do Mato Grosso''. Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército Editora, 1964.
* MARQUES, Rubens Moraes da Costa. ''Trilogia do Patrimônio Histórico e Cultural Sul-Mato-Grossense''. Campo Grande: UFMS, 2001.
* MELLO, Raul Silveira de (Gen.). "Ricardo Franco de Almeida Serra na expansão e delimitação de nossas fronteiras". ''Revista Militar Brasileira'', Rio de Janeiro, Ano L, nos. 1 e 2, v. LXXV, p.&nbsp;25-28, jan.-jun. 1963.
* MELLO, Raul Silveira de (Gen.). ''A História do Forte Coimbra (4 vols.)''. Rio de Janeiro: SMG Imprensa do Exército, 1958-1961.
* MOURA, Carlos Francisco. ''O Forte de Coimbra: sentinela avançada da fronteira''. Cuiabá: Edições UFMT, 1975. 128 p. il.
* SILVA, Jovam Vilela da. ''A lógica portuguesa na ocupação urbana do território mato-grossense''. História & Perspectivas. Uberlândia: nº 24, jan.-jun. 2001.
* SOUSA, Augusto Fausto de. "Fortificações no Brazil". ''RIHGB.'' Rio de Janeiro: Tomo XLVIII, Parte II, 1885. p.&nbsp;5-140.
* s.a. Bicentenário do Forte Coimbra. ''Revista Militar Brasileira'', Rio de Janeiro, Ano LXI, Número Especial, Vol. CVII, 1975.
{{refend}} {{refend}}


Line 93: Line 172:
* *


{{Forts and fortresses of the Portuguese empire|state=collapsed}}
]

]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:08, 13 January 2025

19°55′14″S 057°47′32″W / 19.92056°S 57.79222°W / -19.92056; -57.79222

New Coimbra Fort
Forte Novo de Coimbra
The New Coimbra Fort today
New Coimbra Fort is located in BrazilNew Coimbra FortNew Coimbra FortLocation of the New Coimbra Fort in Brazil
Coordinates19°55′14″S 057°47′32″W / 19.92056°S 57.79222°W / -19.92056; -57.79222
TypeBastion fort
Site information
Controlled byBrazilian Army
Websiteebacervo.eb.mil.br/items/show/217
Site history
Built1775 (1775)
National Historic Heritage of Brazil
Designated1974
Reference no.917-T-1974

The New Coimbra Fort, also known as Fort Portocarrero or simply Fort Coimbra, is a Brazilian military fortification on the Paraguay River, strategically located near the border with Bolivia and Paraguay in Corumbá, in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, in Brazil. The fort was founded in September 13 1775, something that had been planned by the Portuguese colonial authorities ever since the new borders with Spain had been fixed in the Treaty of Madrid in 1750.

History

Background

Brazil's western central region, Mato Grosso, had been explored since the early 18th century by bandeirantes from São Paulo and Jesuit missionaries from land which belongs to Paraguay nowadays. The border between the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires in the region needed to be marked, and the Portuguese solution was the New Coimbra Fort, to be built along the lines of the Spanish presidios of the time.

When the first colonial captain-general to the region, António Tavares, arrived in 1751, he started to build up an administration, and to consolidate plans for defense and further expansion; by 1772, when the captaincy's fourth governor, Luís Pereira e Cáceres [pt], arrived to take power, these were already somewhat established. He soon determined that the planned fort in the Paraguay River be built. Besides the previously planned border demarcation purpose, it would also serve to inhibit the frequent raids by the Payaguá and Kadiwéu indians. Captain Matias Ribeiro da Costa was sent to accomplish this task, with instructions to build the fort somewhere near where the settlement of Porto Murtinho is located today, some 300 kilometers further downriver than where the fort was actually built (the expedition made a mistake). The captain's expedition was made up of 245 men in 15 canoes, guided by an elderly indian man. They set off from Cuiabá on 22 July 1775, and founded the fort on 13 September of the same year. It was called the "Presídio de Coimbra". The place where the fort lies was previously called St. Francis's Narrows, because the Paraguay River became narrower there.

The New Coimbra Fort

In 1791, due to the bad state of the fort's structure, which had been damaged by a fire and Kadiwéu attacks, works were started to renew it, this time using masonry. This was also in part motivated by the Spanish building Forts Borbon and of San Carlos del Apa in the region. Then captain-general Caetano Montenegro [pt] ordered it to be built "in the edge of the hill, where two great lengths of the Paraguay River present themselves at an obtuse angle, which will be then flanked by the new fort, something the old base wouldn't do."

From 1796 onwards, lieutenant colonel Ricardo Serra [pt], a military engineer and geographer, took charge of the construction. His plans for the fort show the original base besides the new one, which was adapted to its terrain, an irregular star fort. Its walls had loopholes and surrounded the entire fort, meeting its hill's slope as it declined. It had room for two batteries of 8 guns set horizontally, which could fire across each other onto the river. To the southeast, a moat protected the fort from ground assaults. Inside the fort, there was a chapel, an arsenal and quarters for its troops. Ricardo Serra would command the fort until 1806; he was buried in it after his death in 1809.

In September 1801, the new fort was still being built when an expedition composed of four schooners and two canoes, carrying 600 men, attacked it; they were led by Lázaro de Ribeira [es], the intendant of Paraguay. The fort encroached on Spanish land, as established in the Treaty of Madrid, and news of peace in the War of the Oranges hadn't yet reached the region. The Brazilians had been previously warned by the now friendly Kadiwéu indians of the expedition's existence, and, though the fort was garrisoned by only 42 men, it resisted the initial assault and then a 10-day siege, after which the Paraguayans withdrew due to the lack of supplies and storm damage on the ships. Throughout the action, the Paraguayans lost 20 men.

In 1851 the fort's weaponry was improved by the addition of four 24-pounder guns and some smaller 9 and 6 pounder guns which had laid since 1820 in the Guaporé River, planned to be installed at the Forte Príncipe da Beira further north. It was expanded and repaired between 1855 and 1856. In 1855, Mato Grosso's government was briefly transferred to the fort by then-provincial president Augusto Leverger amidst tensions with Paraguay.

Just before the Paraguayan War, the fort's status was reported to the provincial president as follows: "In the 30th of the last month I arrived here from Fort Coimbra, to where I led the province's artillery battalion. Your Excellency will probably have received a memorandum regarding that Fort's condition, as well as other measures taken by the Hon. Sir Commander of Arms, who returned with me that same day; I must tell Your Excellency, nevertheless, that said Fort's state is unsatisfactory, but that it can resist Paraguay's ships and maybe defend itself from land attacks. The Hon. Sir Commander of Arms has ordered some improvements and repairs be made which he understands will be advantageous, and he plans to fortify the Navy's old position in front of the Fort, so that they may fire across from each other and aid each other."

The Paraguayan War

Battle of Fort Novo de Coimbra
Part of the Paraguayan War

Paraguayan drawing published in El Cabichuí, depicting cannons firing on the fort and the Brazilian withdrawal
Date27 December 1864 - 29 December 1864
LocationNew Coimbra Fort
Result Paraguayan victory
Belligerents
 Empire of Brazil  Paraguay
Commanders and leaders
Empire of Brazil H. Portocarrero Paraguay Vicente Barrios
Strength
  • 3,200 soldiers
  • 12 guns
  • 11 warships
Casualties and losses
None 200 casualties
Paraguayan War
Mato Grosso campaign
Corrientes campaign
Humaitá campaign
Pikysyry campaign
Cordilleras campaign

The Paraguayan invasion, the opening move of the Mato Grosso Campaign, was made of five infantry batallions and two dismounted cavalry regiments, totalling 3200 men, with twelve rifled guns, a French-equipped rocket battery and the support of 11 warships, all under colonel Vicente Barrios's command. The fort's surrender was demanded on 27 December 1864.

Though the fort's commander was captain Benito de Faria, lieutenant colonel Hermenegildo Portocarrero, commander of all artillery in Mato Grosso and of the Lower Paraguay Military District happened to be there on a routine inspection, and took over its command due to the Paraguayan attack. He replied to the Paraguayan demands with a letter stating "only through luck and the honor of arms will we deliver the fort".

The fort then held 11 functioning bronze smoothbore guns, plus another 20 in need of repairs, and a garrison of 125 regular officers and men, 30 national guards, some custom guards, 6 prisoners and 24 "tame indians". For two days the Paraguayans made intense attacks. The fort's troops' families aided with reloading and the wounded. Lacking the resources necessary to resist the attack and with no reinforcements available nearby, the fort was orderly evacuated between 28 and 29 December by the gunboat Anhambaí. During the action, the Paraguayan forces suffered circa 200 casualties from failed assaults and reconnaissance actions, and the Brazilians suffered no losses. The fort (and its guns) fell under enemy control, and remained under it until April 1868, when the Paraguayans abandoned it, taking away its guns and stores.

After the war ended (in 1870), the fort began to be rebuilt. It had suffered extensive damage during the conflict, with its walls being almost completely destroyed by Paraguayan artillery fire. In 1872, works to expand its west wall were started.

The 20th century and beyond

Between 1907 and 1908 the fort was once again upgraded by the addition of two 120mm Armstrong guns from the ironclad Barroso. New quarters were built beside the fort in 1930. By then, the fort was armed with four 6 inch guns.

The fort was listed as a heritage site by the National Institute of Historic and Artistic Heritage in 1974. Nowadays, the fort hosts the 3rd Frontier Company - Coimbra Fort, which is part of the 18th Frontier Infantry Brigade of the Brazilian Army's Western Military Command. In 2002, said company was designated the Portocarrero Company; in 2016, it was downsized into a platoon. The fort also has a display of historical artillery pieces, hosting the following guns:

Name Image Type Origin Quantity Usage
Whitworth 32 Rifled muzzle loader  United Kingdom 5 1880-1907
Whitworth 70 Rifled muzzle loader  United Kingdom 3 1880-1907
Nordenfelt 57mm Light coastal defense gun  United Kingdom 5 1884-1907
Krupp M1903 Field gun  German Empire 2 1907-1940
Armstrong-Whitworth 120mm Naval gun  United Kingdom 2 1907-1940
Whitworth 152,4mm Naval gun  United Kingdom 4 1940-1986
Vickers-Armstrong 152,4mm Field gun  United Kingdom 2 1986-1992

The fort's legends and traditions

There is a local tale that claims that when the fort was being initially built, Thomas the Apostle passed through its first planned site (further downriver from the actual one) on a journey to Peru, which would have made the place holy and unsuitable for military occupation. Amongst the officers of the fort there is a tradition of devoutness to the Virgin of Carmel, and a custom of, when one of them reaches the rank of general, no matter where they are serving, to send back to her shrine in the fort one of the gold stars of their epaulettes.

In the second day of the 1864 siege, it is said that an army musician raised an image of the Virgin of Carmel over the fort's walls and shouted "long live Our Lady of Mount Carmel", under orders from Portocarrero's wife; the Paraguayans stopped firing and started to shout "long live Our Lady". This allowed some of the fort's women to discreetly head down to the river to collect water for its defenders.

Notes

  1. A name that stems from Hermenegildo Portocarrero, the Brazilian military officer who commanded the fort's garrison at the start of the Paraguayan War; the fort was never formally named thus, but the Coastal Artillery Group which garrisons it was named Portorcarrero Group in his honor.
  2. This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads "na ponta do morro, onde fazem um grande ângulo obtuso dois compridos estirões do Paraguai, que ficarão flanqueados pelo novo forte, o que não faria a antiga estacada."
  3. This is a translation from the original Portuguese, which reads: "A 30 do mês findo cheguei aqui de volta do Forte de Coimbra, para onde fui conduzindo o batalhão de artilharia da província. Provavelmente V. Exa. terá recebido uma participação circunstanciada do estado daquele forte, assim como de outras diligências procedidas pelo exmo. Sr. Comandante das Armas, que comigo regressou no mesmo dia; todavia direi à V. Exa. que não é satisfatório o estado do dito forte, contudo pode resistir aos navios do Paraguai e defender-se talvez de seus ataques por terra. O exmo. sr. Comandante das Armas determinou alguns melhoramentos e serviços que entende serão de vantagem, e pretende fortificar a antiga posição da Marinha em frente ao mesmo forte, de modo que, cruzando os fogos, se auxiliem mutuamente."

References

Citations

  1. "DECRETO-LEI Nº 4.027, DE 16 DE JANEIRO DE 1942".
  2. ^ "Forte de Coimbra" (PDF). DaCultura (in Portuguese). 1 (2). Fundação Cultural do Estado da Bahia. 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2010.
  3. ^ Bento, Cláudio. "FORTE DE COIMBRA: DOIS SÉCULOS DE HISTÓRIA, DE FÉ E DE GLÓRIAS" (PDF). Revista da Academia de História Militar Terrestre do Brasil (in Portuguese). Academia de História Militar Terrestre do Brasil.
  4. Maestri, Mário (2015). "A invasão paraguaia do sul do Mato Grosso". Revista Contraponto. 4 (2). ISSN 2236-6822.
  5. ^ Sousa 1885, p. 134.
  6. Garrido 1940, p. 160.
  7. Barreto 1958.
  8. ^ Sousa 1885, p. 134-135.
  9. Corrêa Filho 1925, p. 136-143.
  10. Corrêa Filho 1925, p. 146.
  11. Guimarães 1964, p. 37.
  12. Benítes 1919, p. 31.
  13. Souza 1919, p. 11-12.
  14. ^ Barreto 1958, p. 303.
  15. Sousa 1885, p. 135.
  16. ^ Garrido 1940, p. 163.
  17. Barreto 1958, p. 302-303.
  18. Almeida 2019, p. 61.
  19. Almeida 2019, p. 65.
  20. Almeida 2019, p. 93.

Sources

External links

Forts and fortresses of the Portuguese Empire
Africa
North Africa
Gold Coast
São Tomé and
Príncipe
Cape Verde
Guinea-Bissau
Angola
East Africa
Mozambique
America
Brazil
Uruguay
Asia
Arabia & Iran
India
Goa
Sri Lanka
Myanmar
Malaysia
Indonesia
Timor-Leste
Macau
Portuguese name in italics and geographical location (between parenthesis)
Categories:
New Coimbra Fort: Difference between revisions Add topic