Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:20, 10 December 2006 editTa bu shi da yu (talk | contribs)32,902 edits I'm taking this back to DRV soon← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:27, 15 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America/Archive 6. (BOT) 
(710 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{deletedpage-r|reason=This article has been deleted as the result of an ]; deletion has been endorsed by ]. See also ].}}
{{controversial}}
{{Censor}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{banner holder|text=Page history|1=
{{ArticleHistory


|action1=GAN
==Note==
|action1date=01:37, 10 July 2011
If anyone has any ] to bring to light on this issue, please do so, this page is now sprotected. Open discussion is not a bad thing (it's a good thing), just try to avoid making this into a revert war page (that doesn't work) -- ] 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|action1link=Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America/GA1
:The fact that the GNAA page has been the topic of so much divisive discussion within Misplaced Pages circles—including a comment on the topic by Wales—is in and of itself notable and verifiable. Perhaps we need a article titled, ”2006_Deletion_of_GNAA_Article” ] 12:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|action1result=fail
::If any note of that particular drama had been taken by independent sources, that'd be one thing, as it is, tempests in this particular teacup don't satisfy the objective definition of ] that we use here. Nor is it verifiable in ''independent sources''. Sorry. -]<sup>(])</sup> 22:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|action1oldid=438696302
::This reminds me of ]. --- ] 23:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


|action2=GAN
==Comment==
|action2date=09:49, 2 September 2012
While I haven't seen the original article to judge it by its content, I'd argue strongly that the GNAA deserves a entry at Misplaced Pages. When the Tony Pierce deletion came up and was posted on Digg by actor Wil Wheaton, he explained that the GNAA had harrassed him years ago. Other people who've spent time online are aware of the GNAA. However, I have strong evidence to suggest that Misplaced Pages has been infiltrated by members of the GNAA, making the ability to write an unbiased article about them nearly impossible. Still, this illustrates the need for their to be a source of information about the group.--] 21:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|action2link=Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America/GA2
:Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be a source of unique information. We're supposed to find it from ''other'' reliable sources, and then add it. -] <small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small> 22:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|action2result=fail
|action2oldid=510412139


|currentstatus=FGAN
What would make writing an unbiased article possible would be non-trivial coverage in multiple independent published sources - no more, no less. That means people writing articles ''about'' GNAA. I'm sure, when the ''History of Teh Internet'' is researched, written and published, GNAA will have a chapter all to themselves. At that point, we'll be able to document them. -]<sup>(])</sup> 22:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
}}
{{old move|date=13 February 2023|destination=GNAA|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1141777755#Requested move 13 February 2023}}
{{old move|date=22 March 2023|destination=Gay Niggers Association of America|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1146157830#Requested move 22 March 2023}}
{{GNAA History}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America/Archive
|format= %%i
|age=720
|header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
|maxarchsize=100000
|minkeepthreads=4
|numberstart=6
|archivebox=no
|box-advert=no
}}


== Suggestion for small edit ==
== I'm taking this back to DRV soon ==


I don't have an account and this page is locked. (Looks like it's locked for good reason lol.) I think this line is phrased poorly:
I'm afraid that I am totally opposed to the way that this was deleted. I am going to take it back to DRV and start asking some fairly searching questions as to why this was deleted. We have had 18 deletion nominations, then it was speedily deleted. If that's not pushing things, I don't know what is. If it basically survived 18 nominations, then I don't see why it was removed in such a way. - ] 08:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of US presidential candidate (and future US president) Barack Obama, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Suggested edit:<br/>
On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his ], where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Original version makes it sound like we're awaiting a 3rd term. Update clarifies that he was president in the past but the incident happened before he was president. It could probably be phrased even clearer, but I couldn't think of anything, so I added a link. If there's a better, more specific link, then that could be used instead.

Also using passive voice makes the phrasing awkward and obscures whether the attack was committed by the GNAA or if it's intentionally not naming an attacker because there's no source providing evidence who the attacker is. If it's the former: Shrey K.

On February 11, 2007, the GNAA attacked the website of former US president Obama at the time of his ], where they caused their name to appear on the website's front page.

If it's the latter:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his ] by causing the name of the GNAA to appear on the website's front page. It's unclear whether the GNAA was responsible.

If that assumes too much or is too leading:

On February 11, 2007, an unknown attacker defaced the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his ], where they caused the name of the GNAA to appear on the website's front page. ] (]) 13:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2024 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Gay Nigger Association of America|answered=yes}}
Copied from the talk page:

Change this line:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of US presidential candidate (and future US president) Barack Obama, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Suggested edit:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his ], where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page. ] (]) 14:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> At the time of the attack, Obama was a presidential candidate, not a former president. ] (]) 17:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

:That's why the sentence says "at the time of his first presidential campaign". ] (]) 11:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::I don't find the proposed rewording clearer. Since that means there's two editors with differing opinions, it isn't an uncontroversial change. As such it needs a consensus before it can be added using the edit request template procedure. ] (]) 16:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 09/04/2024==

Maybe add Jax as part of Other members included, as she was more notable than many of the other members that aren't Andrew as the Biden Campaigns cybersecurity expert.
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Site ==

There's a GNAA site now called gnaa.africa, we sure it's affiliated with them? gnaa.eu is empty ] (]) 07:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:27, 15 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gay Nigger Association of America article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Censorship warningMisplaced Pages is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
[REDACTED] Internet culture Mid‑importance
[REDACTED] This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
          Page history
Former good article nomineeGay Nigger Association of America was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 10, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
September 2, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
On 13 February 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to GNAA. The result of the discussion was not moved.
On 22 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gay Niggers Association of America. The result of the discussion was not moved.
GNAA discussions on Misplaced Pages
AfD/VfD
DRV
PR, GA, FAC, RFF
Draft
Signpost
Essays and the like
Misc.


Suggestion for small edit

I don't have an account and this page is locked. (Looks like it's locked for good reason lol.) I think this line is phrased poorly:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of US presidential candidate (and future US president) Barack Obama, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Suggested edit:
On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his first presidential campaign, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Original version makes it sound like we're awaiting a 3rd term. Update clarifies that he was president in the past but the incident happened before he was president. It could probably be phrased even clearer, but I couldn't think of anything, so I added a link. If there's a better, more specific link, then that could be used instead.

Also using passive voice makes the phrasing awkward and obscures whether the attack was committed by the GNAA or if it's intentionally not naming an attacker because there's no source providing evidence who the attacker is. If it's the former: Shrey K.

On February 11, 2007, the GNAA attacked the website of former US president Obama at the time of his first presidential campaign, where they caused their name to appear on the website's front page.

If it's the latter:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his first presidential campaign by causing the name of the GNAA to appear on the website's front page. It's unclear whether the GNAA was responsible.

If that assumes too much or is too leading:

On February 11, 2007, an unknown attacker defaced the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his first presidential campaign, where they caused the name of the GNAA to appear on the website's front page. 2601:98A:4181:2610:D442:6516:AFEF:E506 (talk) 13:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Copied from the talk page:

Change this line:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of US presidential candidate (and future US president) Barack Obama, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page.

Suggested edit:

On February 11, 2007, an attack was launched on the website of former US president Barack Obama at the time of his first presidential campaign, where the group's name was caused to appear on the website's front page. EO1912 (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: At the time of the attack, Obama was a presidential candidate, not a former president. PianoDan (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

That's why the sentence says "at the time of his first presidential campaign". EO1912 (talk) 11:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't find the proposed rewording clearer. Since that means there's two editors with differing opinions, it isn't an uncontroversial change. As such it needs a consensus before it can be added using the edit request template procedure. PianoDan (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 09/04/2024

Maybe add Jax as part of Other members included, as she was more notable than many of the other members that aren't Andrew as the Biden Campaigns cybersecurity expert. details her surprisingly long history with the group and friendship with "weev" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:F780:1:3137:0:0:0:14 (talk) 11:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Site

There's a GNAA site now called gnaa.africa, we sure it's affiliated with them? gnaa.eu is empty 182.253.246.99 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Gay Nigger Association of America: Difference between revisions Add topic