Revision as of 05:43, 17 January 2025 editHariboneagle927 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users134,756 edits added Category:Proposed laws of the Philippines using HotCat← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:41, 17 January 2025 edit undoArjayay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers630,948 editsm Sp | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox legislation | |||
The '''Religious Instruction Bill''' also known as the '''Cuenco Bill''' was a ] sponsored by ] member ]. | |||
|image = | |||
|short_title = Religious Instruction Bill | |||
|long_title = | |||
|legislature = ] | |||
|citation = | |||
|territorial_extent = | |||
|enacted_by = | |||
|date_enacted = | |||
|date_assented = | |||
|date_signed = | |||
|date_commenced = | |||
|bill = | |||
|bill_citation = House Bill No. 13043 | |||
|bill_date = | |||
|introduced_by = Representative ] | |||
|1st_reading = | |||
|2nd_reading = | |||
|3rd_reading = | |||
|white_paper = | |||
|committee_report = | |||
|amendments = | |||
|repeals = | |||
|related = | |||
|summary = | |||
|keywords = | |||
|status=Not passed | |||
}} | |||
The '''Religious Instruction Bill''' also known as the '''Cuenco Bill''' was a ] sponsored by ] member ]. It was filed as House Bill No. 13043 during the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Papers on the Cuenco Bill (H. no. 13043) |url=https://tuklas.up.edu.ph/Record/UP-99796217604404913?sid=6562942 |website=Tuklas |publisher=University Library, University of the Philippines Diliman |access-date=17 January 2025 |date=1965}}</ref> | |||
The ] has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The ] has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church".<ref name=sociologicalanalysis>{{cite journal |last1=Rivera |first1=Roberto E. N. |title=Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops’ Statements, 1946 to 2000 |journal=Philippine Sociological Review |date=2010 |volume=58 |pages=85-86|url=https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Sociological%20Review/2010/Philippine%20Catholicism%20as%20Disruptive%20Public%20Religion.pdf |access-date=17 January 2025}}</ref> | The ] has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The ] has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church".<ref name=sociologicalanalysis>{{cite journal |last1=Rivera |first1=Roberto E. N. |title=Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops’ Statements, 1946 to 2000 |journal=Philippine Sociological Review |date=2010 |volume=58 |pages=85-86|url=https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Sociological%20Review/2010/Philippine%20Catholicism%20as%20Disruptive%20Public%20Religion.pdf |access-date=17 January 2025}}</ref> | ||
Archbishop ] of Cebu has urged president ] to endorse the bill |
Archbishop ] of Cebu has urged president ] to endorse the bill at the ] special session.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Filipino Bishops Support Religious Education Bill |url=https://thecatholicnewsarchive.org/?a=is&oid=CTR19650624-01&type=staticpdf&pdfaccesscode=PdY6gntLjB9eqSAy80lYIxRdFdgGlkYLBrOc8R6S8c9bI%3D&submitted=1&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN--------&g-recaptcha-response=03AFcWeA6BKH5mo0EvFx9ROgYQPxq5MgB3fayL9SRIdriYcBi64XxmzANgyFXaowl5VEeReaAYq1WImqwJvUDtB53llng2XHkefUkpX8jgxx6e6tMoVfL5TyHpbAMoQ8G66p4DmlATlw74MNWRvnN2BYy_2O5j27C-ogaif1m6xP-0l6Kd2DFxCL09zNPQyeKONl3t_lE1Vtrfxfj8Skf64hCIgOa34WYhnQq22iBz64OdsyJI8HoryE7We8w2w4PFW0C2RplELnlHXk2P4UZlw4_c6ewGr_pOc7VGsKCIcEa34EdNXJHVFL5AojK3CpHGeyFGyx9hX6uSUZ1B5y4FlJmIS2UqCJ0P7UB6KLAPV0SchRaDq8G4HwJr19yXsG4N3jTgY6Y1dc0iKSaN_Qsd5xXpprR25wSsD1Lg3y6KNIIKB3e1P-e7cqnR51Z5tkBlRYwLGUpFJDfP1eW5hZs9V0k6Vw1avbRAPp-A95HhxgiPLspKS-9XG0qObC6z91GCZySECHcZ8qjmmRwPDuIOeuj6wGLeKBbK_9QUteB_IYwBgB8c5Y6ojd1KUZtkzrx7ZBM89g1jxzLxL4pebdPIcGVyuY3JWXi48e5jM9V18Y1a7Nx-KcaPq605mX6S36AOQ5LnSmNaLW14B7NrD1qhb13GnLZQ4FLut6zlDLM3av1ZMA6bDnr6JKgGM2sa5eG1sIIXosGvm7iKlz5SaOb1nEsRh3bb0phAej5hw0TPYg6KbAJwMlB0IZzhxj65i_SmGdTIMCyR-ygpZVBK35swr5q580doKBqWZ6NwDE7pGO4RbsD-shIDf437aRIKGPyeYqJ5GOR7jwLCyNW1U_JFMO_wubxSJ3gf9mPficrSQZh1GGd_-CRYTrtGd_-JzOHa7TwRLhz6M83qoUNqIaXX1cSVqxSzjVzoLA |journal=The Catholic Transcript |access-date=17 January 2025 |date=24 June 1965|volume=LXVIII|issue=9|page=21}}</ref> | ||
Noted opposition to the bill was the Christian denomination ] who views that the Roman Catholic church could have a monopoly in ] in ].<ref>{{cite news |title=History of Davao - Iglesia’s influence-peddling circa 1965 |url=https://edgedavao.net/the-big-news/2015/12/history-of-davao-iglesias-influence-peddling-circa-1965/ |access-date=17 January 2025 |work=Edge Davao |date=14 December 2015}}</ref> The INC's opposition was dramatized in the film, ''Ipakipaglaban ang Pananampalataya''.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mayo |first1=Stephanie |title=INC’s faith and unity in cinema |url=https://tribune.net.ph/2025/01/11/incs-faith-and-unity-in-cinema |access-date=17 January 2025 |work=Daily Tribune |date=11 January 2025 |language=en}}</ref> | Noted opposition to the bill was the Christian denomination ] who views that the Roman Catholic church could have a monopoly in ] in ].<ref>{{cite news |title=History of Davao - Iglesia’s influence-peddling circa 1965 |url=https://edgedavao.net/the-big-news/2015/12/history-of-davao-iglesias-influence-peddling-circa-1965/ |access-date=17 January 2025 |work=Edge Davao |date=14 December 2015}}</ref> The INC's opposition was dramatized in the film, ''Ipakipaglaban ang Pananampalataya''.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mayo |first1=Stephanie |title=INC’s faith and unity in cinema |url=https://tribune.net.ph/2025/01/11/incs-faith-and-unity-in-cinema |access-date=17 January 2025 |work=Daily Tribune |date=11 January 2025 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
The bill did not pass.<ref name=sociologicalanalysis/> | The bill did not pass.<ref name=sociologicalanalysis/> | ||
==Further readings== | |||
*{{cite web |last1=Rosales |first1=Julio |author1-link=Julio Rosales |title=Joint Statement of the Catholic Hierarchy on the Religious Instruction Bill |url=https://cbcponline.net/joint-statement-of-the-catholic-hierarchy-on-the-religious-instruction-bill/ |website=CBCP Online |access-date=17 January 2025 |location=Manila |date=6 June 1965}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 12: | Line 43: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 17 January 2025
Religious Instruction Bill | |
---|---|
Congress of the Philippines | |
Bill citation | House Bill No. 13043 |
Introduced by | Representative Miguel Cuenco |
Status: Not passed |
The Religious Instruction Bill also known as the Cuenco Bill was a proposed legislation sponsored by House of Representatives member Miguel Cuenco. It was filed as House Bill No. 13043 during the 5th Congress.
The Roman Catholic Church has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The Department of Education has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church". Archbishop Julio Rosales of Cebu has urged president Diosdado Macapagal to endorse the bill at the Senate special session.
Noted opposition to the bill was the Christian denomination Iglesia ni Cristo who views that the Roman Catholic church could have a monopoly in religious instruction in public education. The INC's opposition was dramatized in the film, Ipakipaglaban ang Pananampalataya.
The bill did not pass.
Further readings
- Rosales, Julio (6 June 1965). "Joint Statement of the Catholic Hierarchy on the Religious Instruction Bill". CBCP Online. Manila. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
References
- "Papers on the Cuenco Bill (H. no. 13043)". Tuklas. University Library, University of the Philippines Diliman. 1965. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- ^ Rivera, Roberto E. N. (2010). "Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops' Statements, 1946 to 2000" (PDF). Philippine Sociological Review. 58: 85–86. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- "Filipino Bishops Support Religious Education Bill". The Catholic Transcript. LXVIII (9): 21. 24 June 1965. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- "History of Davao - Iglesia's influence-peddling circa 1965". Edge Davao. 14 December 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- Mayo, Stephanie (11 January 2025). "INC's faith and unity in cinema". Daily Tribune. Retrieved 17 January 2025.