Revision as of 19:29, 13 October 2011 view source75.128.122.140 (talk) →The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:58, 18 January 2025 view source Di (they-them) (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,187 edits Moved subsection to maintain order of release | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
<!-- PLEASE NOTE, THIS LIST IS NOT SUBJECT TO PERSONAL OPINION! BEFORE INSERTING A MOVIE, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT IT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN DEFINED "THE WORST" BY REPUTABLE SOURCES. YOU MAY ALSO WANT TO CHECK WHETHER IT HAS ALREADY BEEN INSERTED AND REMOVED BEFORE. SEE SUBPAGE http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Films_considered_the_worst_ever/Removed_films FOR MORE INFORMATION. -->{{Globalize/US|date=April 2010}} | |||
{{for|the 2011 American action comedy|The Worst Movie Ever!{{!}}The Worst Movie Ever!}} | |||
{{pp-move-indef}} | |||
{{protection padlock|reason=Persistent ]|small=yes}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2022}} | |||
{{Use American English|date=March 2023}} | |||
{{Dynamic list}} | |||
]'' (1936), one of the earliest films to garner particularly negative contemporary reviews<ref name="psmag">{{cite news|last=Lincoln|first=Kevin|title=The Benefits of Being the Worst Movie Ever Made|url=https://psmag.com/economics/benefits-worst-movie-ever-made-84813|access-date=October 23, 2017|work=]|date=July 2, 2014|language=en|archive-date=October 23, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171023115728/https://psmag.com/economics/benefits-worst-movie-ever-made-84813|url-status=live}}</ref>]] | |||
The ]s listed |
The ]s listed below have been cited by a variety of notable critics in varying media sources as being among the worst films ever made. Examples of such sources include ], ]'s list of most-hated films, '']'', '']'', ], ] writer ]'s '']'', the ], the cult TV series '']'' (alongside spinoffs '']'', '']'' and '']''), and the ] (aka the "Razzies"). Films on these lists are generally ] that are ]/] in nature (intended to turn a profit, express personal statements or both), professionally or independently produced (as opposed to ] productions, such as ]), and released in theaters, then on home video. | ||
== |
== 1930s == | ||
==='']'' (1953)=== | |||
], '']'' began a string of bad B-movies created by ].]] | |||
A semi-] quasi-] about ], starring and directed by ]. After a nightmarish dream sequence, Glen undergoes psychotherapy to help cure his affliction. ] appears in this film, as he did in several other Wood films toward the end of his career. Many of Wood's fans and critic ] insist that this was far worse than '']''; Maltin considers it "possibly the worst movie ever made".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> In his book ''Cult Movies 3'', ] suggests that this is actually a radical, if ineptly made film that presents a far more personal story than is contained in films by more well-respected ]s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Peary |first=Danny |authorlink=Danny Peary |title=Cult Movies 3: 50 More of the Classics, the Sleepers, the Weird and the Wonderful |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=1988 |isbn=978-067164810-7}}</ref> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Maniac'' (1934) === | ||
{{Main|Maniac (1934 film){{!}}''Maniac'' (1934 film)}} | |||
A ] film, originally shot and exhibited in ], featuring an actor dressed in a gorilla suit and what looks almost like a ]. The film, produced and directed by ], is listed in Michael Sauter's book ''The Worst Movies of All Time'' among "The Baddest of the B's." It is also featured in '']'' 10 worst movie list, in '']''. '']'' confers its main character the title of "Most Ridiculous Monster in Screen History" and, listing its director Phil Tucker among the runners-up to "Worst Director of All Time" (the winner being Ed Wood), states that "What made ''Robot Monster'' ineffably worse than any other low-budget sci-fi epic was its bizarre artistic pretension". Noted film composer ] wrote the score for this film. It was featured on '']'',<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Robot Monster |publisher=TV.com |date= |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/robot-monster/episode/46805/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;6/ |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> and was fondly remembered by author ] who quotes, and agrees with, a review in '']'' magazine ("certainly among the finest terrible movies ever made", "one of the most laughable ] quickies").<ref>{{cite book |first=Stephen |last=King |title=] |year=1981 |publisher=Everest House |location=New York |isbn=978-089696076-3}}</ref> | |||
]'' (1934) is one of the many ] exploitation films from the 1930s featuring sex, violence and drugs (especially ]).]] | |||
''Maniac'', also known as ''Sex Maniac'', is a ] ]-] directed by ]. The story is a loose adaptation of the ] story "]" and follows a ] impersonator who becomes an assistant to a ]. Promoted as a documentary on ], ''Maniac'' was criticized for its gratuitous footage of women undressing and for plagiarizing horror sequences from the 1922 silent film '']''. ] believes that ''Maniac'' is the worst film ever made, and ] of ]{{'}}s ] described it as "possibly the worst movie in history."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Peary|first=Danny|author-link=Danny Peary|title=Cult Midnight Movies: Discover the 37 Best Weird, Sleazy, Sexy, and Crazy Good Cinema Classics|publisher=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TTsPBAAAQBAJ&q=Maniac+%281934%29+Dwain+Esper|year=2014|isbn=9780761181699|access-date=October 2, 2020|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172439/https://books.google.com/books?id=TTsPBAAAQBAJ&q=Maniac+%281934%29+Dwain+Esper#v=snippet&q=Maniac%20(1934)%20Dwain%20Esper&f=false|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://io9.gizmodo.com/did-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-come-out-75-years-ago-5161275 |title=Did The Worst Movie Of All Time Come Out 75 Years Ago? |publisher=] |last=Anders |first=Charlie Jane |date=February 26, 2009 |access-date=February 18, 2019 |archive-date=February 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190218201930/https://io9.gizmodo.com/did-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-come-out-75-years-ago-5161275 |url-status=live }}</ref> ] placed ''Maniac'' on its list of movies "So Bad They're Unmissable",<ref name="sobad"/> '']'' included the film on its list of the 20 worst movies ever and it is featured in ]'s book '']''.<ref name="italianvanity">{{cite news|url=https://www.vanityfair.it/show/cinema/2018/02/25/20-film-piu-brutti-di-sempre|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108083603/https://www.vanityfair.it/show/cinema/2018/02/25/20-film-piu-brutti-di-sempre |work=]|title=I 20 film più brutti di sempre|last=Pellegrini|first=Francesca|language=it|date=February 25, 2018|access-date=February 18, 2019|archive-date=January 8, 2022}}</ref> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Reefer Madness'' (1936) === | ||
{{Main|Reefer Madness{{!}}''Reefer Madness''}} | |||
A ]-funded ] featuring white actor ] as ]n chieftain ] and the redheaded ] as a ] princess. The movie was filmed near ], downwind from a ] range in ], and is often blamed for the ] deaths of many of the cast and crew, including Hayward, Wayne, ], ], and director ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Cecil |title=Did John Wayne die of cancer caused by a radioactive movie set? |publisher=The Straight Dope |date=October 26, 1984 |url=http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_016.html |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> The film made the 10-worst list in ''The Book of Lists'', appears in Michael Sauter's book ''The Worst Movies of All Time'', and was one of the films listed in ] book '']''. Hughes refused to distribute the film until 1974, when ] reached a deal with him. This was the last film that Hughes produced. | |||
] film '']'' was called "the grand-daddy of all 'Worst' movies" by ].]] | |||
''Reefer Madness'' (originally released as ''Tell Your Children'' and sometimes titled or subtitled as ''The Burning Question'', ''Dope Addict'', ''Doped Youth'', and ''Love Madness'') is a 1936 American ] and ] revolving around the melodramatic events that ensue when high school students are lured by pushers to smoke ]— and consequently become addicted and involved in various crimes such as a ], ], ], attempted rape, and descent into madness, association with organized crime and suicide. | |||
'']'' wrote that ''Reefer Madness'' was "one of the first films ever to be considered transcendentally bad"<ref name="psmag"/> and ] has called it "the grand-daddy of all 'Worst' movies".<ref name="Maltin01211">{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Maltin |title=Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2004 |publisher=Signet |year=2003 |isbn=0-451-20940-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/leonardmaltinsmo00leon }}</ref> '']'' named it the "worst ever" runner-up to '']'',<ref>{{cite news |url=http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2009/09/24/ae/stage/iq_31362594.txt |date=September 24, 2009 |last=McKee |first=David |work=Las Vegas CityLife |access-date=November 17, 2013 |title=What's the Worst Movie Ever? |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130903051856/http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2009/09/24/ae/stage/iq_31362594.txt |archive-date=September 3, 2013 }}</ref> and ] considered it a "disastrous flop turned cult classic" due to its "terrible acting and exaggerated drug-addicted stereotypes".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/when-hollywoods-worst-films-become-cult-classics/news-story/792f3f09aba66809245d65328c73921c|title=When Hollywood's worst films become cult classics|work=]|first=Troy|last=Lennon|date=December 7, 2017|access-date=January 20, 2019|archive-date=January 21, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121064145/https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/when-hollywoods-worst-films-become-cult-classics/news-story/792f3f09aba66809245d65328c73921c|url-status=live}}</ref> Natalli Amato of '']'' included ''Reefer Madness'' on her list of the best worst movies, writing that it "may be one of the worst movies of all time for the fact that it accomplished the exact opposite of its intended goal" by becoming a cult classic among stoners.<ref>{{cite web |last=St-Amand |first=Vanessa |title=Ranked: The best worst movies you need to watch |url=https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/best-worst-movies/ |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=March 29, 2022 |archive-date=June 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220619224037/https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/best-worst-movies/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']''{{'}}s Danté Jordan also wrote that it may be "the worst movie of all time", criticizing its many inaccuracies regarding marijuana use and calling it "easily one of the most uncreative and tone-deaf pieces of anti-cannabis propaganda".<ref>{{cite web |last=Jordan |first=Danté |title=We watched 'Reefer Madness' to confirm it's still complete garbage |url=https://www.leafly.com/news/lifestyle/reasons-why-reefer-madness-is-complete-garbage |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=January 27, 2020 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708065233/https://www.leafly.com/news/lifestyle/reasons-why-reefer-madness-is-complete-garbage |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==='']'' (1959)=== | |||
]'s ''Plan 9'' was labeled the "Worst Film Ever" by '']''. This movie marked the final appearance of ]. Wood shot only a small amount of test footage featuring his idol Lugosi before the actor's death. This footage, repeated several times, was included in the final movie. Following Lugosi's death, the character was played by ], the ] of Wood's wife at the time, who played his scenes holding the character's cape in front of his face. Wood was apparently undeterred by the numerous physical differences{{ndash}}such as height, build and that Mason was nearly bald while Lugosi retained a full head of hair until his death{{ndash}}that distinguished Mason from Lugosi. Years later, video distributors such as Avenue One DVD began to make light of this, adding such blurbs as "Almost Starring Bela Lugosi" to the cover art. Shot in 1956, the film was not released until 1959 due to difficulty in finding a distributor. It has played at the New Orleans Worst Film Festival. In 1994, ] directed '']'', which includes some material about the trials and tribulations of making ''Plan 9''. On the popular film review site ] Phil Hall calls it "Far too entertaining to be considered as the very worst film ever made".<ref name="Rotten Tomatoes">{{rotten-tomatoes|id=plan_9_from_outer_space|title=Plan 9 from Outer Space}}</ref> Likewise John Wirt goes as far as to call it "The ultimate cult flick",<ref name="Rotten Tomatoes"/> and ''Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics'' states that, "In fact, the film has become so famous for its own badness that it's now beyond criticism."<ref>{{cite book |last=Schwartz |first=Carol |title=Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics |publisher=Visible Ink Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0787606169}}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Terror of Tiny Town'' (1938) === | |||
==1960s== | |||
{{Main|The Terror of Tiny Town{{!}}''The Terror of Tiny Town''}} | |||
==='']'' (1961)=== | |||
''The Terror of Tiny Town'', directed by ] and produced by ], remains the only ] ] with an all-] cast.<ref name="tinyterror"/> The film was pulled from obscurity as a ] after appearing in college and ] in the early 1970s.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Terror of Tiny Town (1938)|url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92598/the-terror-of-tiny-town|access-date=December 16, 2020|website=Turner Classic Movies|language=en|archive-date=June 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210614012516/https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92598/the-terror-of-tiny-town|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1978, it was included in ]'s book, '']'',<ref name="tinyterror">{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-terror-of-tiny-town-dvd/|title=The Terror of Tiny Town (DVD)|work=Film Threat|date=June 17, 2005|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=March 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200324034956/https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-terror-of-tiny-town-dvd/|url-status=live}}</ref> and has since been listed as one of the worst films ever made, by '']'',<ref name="Flavorwire"/> Rotten Tomatoes,<ref name="sobad"/> and '']''.<ref name="tinyterror"/> ] referred to it as "Perhaps the worst film of all time",<ref>{{Cite book|last=Defleur|first=Melvin|author-link=Melvin Defleur|title=Understanding Mass Communication: A Liberal Arts Perspective|publisher=]|edition=6|year=1998|page=160}}</ref> and critic Gabriel Ricard listed it as the worst film ever made; stating, "not only is it pretty terrible, but ''Tiny Town'' is also pretty endearing."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://culturedvultures.com/best-worst-movies/|title=20 Best Worst Movies Of All Time|work=Cultured Vultures|last=Richard|first=Gabriel|date=June 5, 2019|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=December 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209080410/https://culturedvultures.com/best-worst-movies/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1986, ''The Terror of Tiny Town'' was the first film featured on '']'', a ] show featuring the worst movies ever made.<ref name="cannedfilm">{{cite web|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-06-20-8602140300-story.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220507001443/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-06-20-8602140300-story.html|title=A 'Terror' Kicks Off World's Worst Film Festival|work=]|last=Terry|first=Clifford|date=June 20, 1989|access-date=March 23, 2020|archive-date=May 7, 2022}}</ref> | |||
A film by ] shot silently with added narration. The plot concerns a scientist (played by ]) who is exposed to radiation from an atomic blast, which turns him into a monster. The film opens with a scene of implied ] that has nothing to do with the remainder of the movie and does not fit anywhere into the film's chronology. '']'s TV and Movie Guide'' calls it "one of the worst films ever made".<ref>{{cite book| first=Leonard |last=Maltin |edition=2007 |title=Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide |publisher=Plume |location=New York |isbn=0452288932 |page=94}}</ref> ] said "It may very well be the worst non-] ] movie ever made."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-beast-of-yucca-flats-1961/ |title=Full Movie Walk-throughs |publisher=Monster Shack |date=2009-02-10 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> It remains on the IMDb's Bottom 100 movie list,<ref name="IMDB100">{{cite web |url=http://www.imdb.com/chart/bottom |title=IMDb Bottom 100 |publisher=IMDb.com |date= |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> and was also featured on '']'', where members of the cast state it is by far one of the worst films they have seen up to that point.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0621.htm |title=Experiment Guide |publisher=Castle Forrester |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> Francis' other two films, '']'' and '']'', can also be frequently found on the IMDB Bottom 100; both were featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000 as well. | |||
== 1940s == | |||
==='']'' (1962)=== | |||
A low-budget shocker, featuring ] as a prehistoric caveman emerging in early 1960s California and finding love with another teenager. ] performs musical numbers, with lyrics widely considered to be terrible. The film's notoriety was enhanced as a result of being featured on episodes of '']'' and '']'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0506.htm |title=Experiment Guide |publisher=Castle Forrester |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> where the cast of the show stated in ''The Mystery Science Theater 3000 Amazing Colossal Episode Guide'' (ISBN 0-553-37783-3), that they consider the shaving scene (where Eegah lolls his tongue around and laps up shaving cream) to be one of the most disgusting things they have seen. It was also one of the films listed in ]'s book '']''. It remains on the IMDb's Bottom 100 movie list.<ref name="IMDB100"/> | |||
==='' |
=== ''The Babe Ruth Story'' (1948) === | ||
{{Main|The Babe Ruth Story{{!}}''The Babe Ruth Story''}} | |||
Directed by Arthur J. Nelson (who also stars in the film under the pseudonym Vic Savage), the film is memorable for its use of some bargain-basement effects: stock footage of a rocket launch played in reverse to depict the landing of an alien spacecraft, and the "monster" appears to be composed of a length of ] draped over several actors, whose sneakers are occasionally visible. Due to having had most of its dialogue lost, the movie also employs a technique that has come to be synonymous with Z-movie horror: ] narration. The movie was lampooned in September 1994 in an episode of '']''. It remains on the IMDb's Bottom 100 movie list.<ref name="IMDB100"/> Director ] is currently making a documentary about the movie titled '']'', to be released in 2012. | |||
], who played The Great Bambino in '']'' (1948), cited as one of the worst ] ever made.]] | |||
''The Babe Ruth Story'' is a 1948 ] biography of ], starring ], ] and ].<ref>{{Citation|last1=Del Ruth|first1=Roy|title=The Babe Ruth story|date=2010|publisher=Warner Home Video|language=en|oclc=694103117|last2=Considine|first2=Bob|last3=Callahan|first3=George|last4=Bendix|first4=William|last5=Trevor|first5=Claire|last6=Bickford|first6=Charles|last7=Frawley|first7=William|last8=Levene|first8=Sam|last9=Allied Artists Productions}}</ref> '']'' describes it as "the '']'' of baseball biopics".<ref>{{cite news |title=The Babe Ruth Story (1948)|url=https://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/3535/The-Babe-Ruth-Story/overview |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219200719/http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/3535/The-Babe-Ruth-Story/overview |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 19, 2013 |department=Movies & TV Dept.|work=]|first=Hal|last=Erickson|author-link=Hal Erickson (author)|date=2013|access-date=November 30, 2013}}</ref> It was rushed into release while Ruth was still alive. One infamous scene features Ruth promising a dying child that he will hit two ]s. The child is subsequently cured of his ailments after Ruth delivers on the promise.<ref name="homerun"/> | |||
]r ] believed it to be the worst movie he had ever seen. '']'' stated that it "stands as possibly the worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite news |title=Duke as Williams? A Prince of an Idea |first=Dan |last=Shaughnessy |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XscSAAAAIBAJ&pg=7230,788739&dq=babe+ruth+story+worst+film |newspaper=Spokane Chronicle |date=April 3, 1986 |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=August 16, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816054117/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XscSAAAAIBAJ&pg=7230,788739&dq=babe+ruth+story+worst+film |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Heller |first=Dick |title=Clinic and reception in the works to honor NBA pioneer Lloyd |newspaper=The Washington Times |date=July 23, 2000 |url-access=subscription |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WT&p_theme=wt&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB08BFA289BE4FB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101055233/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WT&p_theme=wt&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB08BFA289BE4FB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' included the film on its list of the worst films of all time, while Paul Newberry of the '']'' wrote that the film's place on "nearly every list of the worst movies ever made" was "with good reason".<ref>{{cite web |last=Apple |first=Charles |title=Some of the worst movies of all-time |url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/22/some-worst-movies-all-time/ |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=September 22, 2020 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710190457/https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/22/some-worst-movies-all-time/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Newberry |first=Paul |title=Counting down baseball's worst movie locales |url=https://www.providencejournal.com/story/sports/2019/08/10/counting-down-baseballs-worst-movie-locales/4492519007/ |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=August 10, 2019 |archive-date=June 25, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220625165504/https://www.providencejournal.com/story/sports/2019/08/10/counting-down-baseballs-worst-movie-locales/4492519007/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']''{{'}}s Jack Mathews similarly wrote that ''The Babe Ruth Story'' was "what many people consider to be the worst sports movie of all time".<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dunne |first=Michael |title=Post-War Cultural Construction in "The Babe Ruth Story" |journal=Studies in Popular Culture |date=October 1996 |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23413739 |access-date=July 10, 2022 |publisher=Popular Culture Association in the South |jstor=23413739 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710190457/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23413739 |url-status=live }}</ref> It also was called one of the worst sports films ever each by ''Newsday'' and '']'',<ref>{{cite news |last=Isaacs |first=Stan |title=Out ofLeft Field – The 10 Worst Sports Movies Of All Time |newspaper=Newsday |date=February 26, 1989 |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/278087041 |access-date=November 30, 2013 |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203051629/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/doc/278087041.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb%2026,%201989&author=Stan%20Isaacs&pub=Newsday%20%28Combined%20editions%29&edition=&startpage=&desc=OUT%20OF%20LEFT%20FIELD%20The%2010%20Worst%20Sports%20Movies%20Of%20All%20Time |id={{ProQuest|278087041}} |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="homerun">{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/the-home-run-that-cured-cancer-16-amazing-movie-sports-1798214998|title=The home run that cured cancer: 16 Amazing Movie Sports Feats|last1=Mincher|first1=Chris|last2=Bahn|first2=Christopher|date=October 6, 2008|website=]|language=en-US|access-date=April 16, 2019|last3=Modell|first3=Josh|last4=Gillette|first4=Amelie|last5=Tobias|first5=Scott|last6=Murray|first6=Noel|last7=Pierce|first7=Leonard|archive-date=April 16, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416101215/https://film.avclub.com/the-home-run-that-cured-cancer-16-amazing-movie-sports-1798214998|url-status=live}}</ref> and called one of the worst biopics by ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.moviefone.com/2009/11/05/worst-movie-biopics/|title=Worst Movie Biopics: Real-Life Catastrophes|date=November 5, 2009|access-date=November 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203031806/http://news.moviefone.com/2009/11/05/worst-movie-biopics/|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=dead|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.spike.com/articles/td0rkp/all-access-weekly-blockbuster-hollywood-bios-the-good-the-bad-and-the-jobs|title=Blockbuster Hollywood Bios: The Good, the Bad, and the "Jobs"|last=Marshall|first=Kevin|date=August 16, 2013|website=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203195640/http://www.spike.com/articles/td0rkp/all-access-weekly-blockbuster-hollywood-bios-the-good-the-bad-and-the-jobs|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=dead|access-date=April 16, 2019}}</ref> Entertainment writer Michael Sauter included the film in his book, ''The Worst Movies of All Time'', and Leonard Maltin called it "perfectly dreadful".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> | |||
==='']'' (1964)=== | |||
This holiday staple was the creation of ]. When ] children get to see ] only on TV, their parents decide to abduct Santa to make them happy. Like many others in this category, it has been featured in ''Mystery Science Theater 3000''.<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Santa Claus Conquers the Martians |publisher=TV.com |date= |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/episode/46920/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;47/ |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> The film is cited on a 10-worst list in '']'', in '']''. It is also known for starring a very young ]. ] released a production of the movie in November 2008. | |||
==='' |
=== ''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' (1948) === | ||
{{Main|No Orchids for Miss Blandish (film){{!}}''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' (film)}} | |||
''Monster A Go-Go'' began as ''Terror at Halfday'' by ]. The production ran out of money and the film was abandoned. ], who reportedly needed a second feature to compose a double bill, purchased and completed the film for a minimal amount of money. Several of the film's actors were unable to return, so Lewis simply replaced their parts with new characters who mysteriously appear and fill the roles of the missing characters. One of the actors Lewis managed to rehire had gained weight, gone bald, and grown a goatee, so Lewis recast him as the brother of the original character.<ref name="agony">{{cite web |date=June 16, 2003 |url=http://www.agonybooth.com/monster_a_go_go/default.asp?Page=5 |title=Recap: Monster A-Go Go (1965)|work=The Agony Booth |accessdate=2007-01-21}}</ref> The picture consists mostly of lengthy dialogue sequences concerning the apparent mutation of an astronaut into a monster. Much of the film's dialogue is unintelligible due to poor audio quality, and due to overexposure of the film, several characters' faces appear to be bright white, glowing circles. At one point, when a phone supposedly rings, a person can easily be heard making the noise with his mouth.<ref>{{youtube|5dKiaRUKgmA|MST3K - 421 - Human Phone Ring}}</ref> During the climax of the movie, as soldiers prepare to confront the mutated astronaut, he abruptly vanishes and the narrator informs the audience that "there was no monster," and that the astronaut has, in fact, been in the Atlantic Ocean the entire time. ] calls the film a "surreal anti-masterpiece",<ref>{{cite web |last=Beldin |first=Fred |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go |publisher=Allmovie.com |date= |url=http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=1:33169~T1/ |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> and is currently number 5 on IMDB's Bottom 100 list.<ref>{{IMDb title|59464|Monster a-Go Go}}</ref> It was also featured on ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'', where writer ] called the dialogue "beyond recognition", and also added "I recall this episode as being the first time we decided explicitly to write sketches having nothing to do with the movie. Really, we had no choice. We ran through a long string of topics trying to find one that had something to do with the movie, but since the movie is about nothing, any topic that is about something (that is, any topic that exhibits "topicness") cannot, by definition, have anything to do with this movie. Understand? Interesting philosophical dilemma. I think we solved it nicely.",<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go |publisher=Castle Forrester |date= |url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0421.htm |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> The entire cast of the show later stated it was officially the worst movie they have ever seen.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.angelfire.com/ga/hikeeba/mst3kguide.html |title=Hi-keeba!'s MST3K Episode Guide |publisher=Angelfire.com |date=2001-03-01 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> | |||
''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'', a British ] adapted from the 1939 ] by ], received a very hostile reception from the press. This was mainly due to the film's high (for the time) level of sexual and violent content, but also because its attempt to portray Americans using a largely British cast (including an early role for ])<ref name="goodwin">{{cite book |first=Cliff |last=Goodwin |title=Sid James: A Biography |publisher=Random House |year=2011 |isbn=978-0-7535-4682-6 |pages=67–68 }}</ref> was seen as unconvincing.<ref name="bmc">{{cite book |last=McFarlane |first=Brian |year=1999 |chapter=Outrage: No Orchids for Miss Blandish |title=British Crime Cinema |editor-first=Steve |editor-last=Chibnall |editor-first2=Robert |editor-last2=Murphy |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-16870-8 |pages=37–50 }}</ref> | |||
The British film journal '']'' called it "the most sickening exhibition of brutality, perversion, sex and sadism ever to be shown on a cinema screen".<ref name="bmc"/> The '']'' film reviewer called ''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' "the worst film I have ever seen".<ref name="hfg">{{cite book |title=Halliwell's Film Guide |publisher=HarperPerennial |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-06-273318-4 |page=781 }}</ref> The Australian newspaper '']'' also gave a harsh review: "''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' is not only a disgrace to the studio that made it, but it also reflects on the British industry as a whole ... the entire production is unpardonable."<ref>{{cite news |title=Question of Propriety for the Censor |url=https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/205685128/19598563 |access-date=2024-12-13 |work=The Age |date=1948-11-27 |location=Melbourne |page=9 |via=Trove}}</ref> | |||
==='']'' (1966)=== | |||
] being left out.]] | |||
A low-budget horror film made by ] fertilizer salesman ], about a vacationing family that is kidnapped by a polygamous cult of ]s. Among its most notorious flaws, besides poor production qualities, is the opening sequence, a several minute long series of long tracking shots of the countryside with almost no dialogue; it was intended to be the opening credits sequence, but no credits were ever developed to be superimposed over the footage. The film also dedicates significant time to a teenage couple who are spotted at various locations making out in their car, and who have no bearing on the plot other than to point the police in the direction of the cult compound during the film's climax. The film's main monster, Torgo (John Reynolds) was intended to be a ], but this is never stated onscreen and only conveyed with the use of a bizarre prosthesis which made the actor's knees bulge and forced him to walk awkwardly. The film gained notoriety and cult popularity by being featured on ''Mystery Science Theater 3000''.<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Manos: The Hands of Fate |publisher=TV.com |date= |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/manos-the-hands-of-fate/episode/46947/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;74/ |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> As of March 2011, it has a 0% rating at ], based on 11 reviews.<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=manos_the_hands_of_fate|title=Manos – the Hands of Fate}}</ref> It is in the Top 10 on the IMDb Bottom 100,<ref name="IMDB100"/> where at one time it held the #1 spot, and is also in the Top 10 of the Bottom 200 movie list at ].<ref name="Everyone">{{cite web |url=http://www.everyonesacritic.net/movie_rank.asp?list=bottom |title=IMDb Bottom 200 movie list |publisher=Everyone's a Critic |date= |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> | |||
Cliff Goodwin, discussing ''No Orchids for Miss Blandish''{{'}}s initial reception, notes it was "unanimously dubbed 'the worst film ever made{{'"}}.<ref name="goodwin"/> Later reviews of the film were equally antipathetic. ''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' was described by British film reviewer ] as a "hilariously awful gangster film ... one of the worst films ever made".<ref name="hfg"/> '']'' states that ''No Orchids for Miss Blandish'' "aspires to be a Hollywood ] and misses by a mile."<ref>{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |year=2011 |title=Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide: From The Silent Era Through 1965 |edition=Second |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-452-29577-3 |page=474 }}</ref> | |||
==1970s== | |||
{{Expand section|date=May 2011}} | |||
== 1950s == | |||
===''] (1970)''=== | |||
This 1970 film based on the ] by ], directed by ] and starring ], ], ] and ] provoked controversy due to a scene in which Welch ] ] a bound man while clips from various classic films play onscreen. The film was initially ] before edits and an appeal to the MPAA brought it down to an R. The film also used the technique of inserting clips from ] movies in such a way that the dialogue took on sexual undertones. Several stars whose films were featured objected to the gimmick, and some (such as ]) sued to remove the footage. The film was a critical failure, with ] saying "''Myra Breckinridge'' is about as funny as a child molester."<ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |title=Cinema:Some Sort of Nadir |publisher=time.com |date=July 6, 1970 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878382,00.html |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> The film is also cited in the book '']''. Gore Vidal has disowned the film, calling it "an awful joke",<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hoberman |first1=J. |authorlink1=J. Hoberman |last2=Rosenbaum |first2=Jonathan |authorlink2=Jonathan Rosenbaum |title=Midnight Movies |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=1991 |isbn=0-306-80433-6 |page=268}}</ref> and blamed the movie for a decade-long drought in the sale of the original book.<ref>{{cite book |last=Conner |first=Floyd |title=Hollywood's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Lucky Breaks, Prima Donnas, Box Office Bombs, and Other Oddities |publisher=Brassey's |year=2002 |isbn=1-574-88480-8 |page=65}}</ref> | |||
=== '' |
=== ''Glen or Glenda'' (1953) === | ||
{{Main|Glen or Glenda{{!}}''Glen or Glenda''}} | |||
] in a scene from '']''. He directed ''Glen or Glenda'' and '']'' and was named the Worst Director of All Time in '']''.]] | |||
''Glen or Glenda'' starred ] as Glen, a transvestite who cross-dresses as Glenda. Wood also directed the film. After a ], Glen undergoes psychotherapy to help "cure" him of his ]. | |||
] wrote that ''Glen or Glenda'' was worse than Wood's later '']'' and considered it "possibly the worst movie ever made".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> Julien Allen of '']'' similarly wrote that it was "widely considered to be an atrocity" and "the most catastrophic failure of singularly bad career".<ref>{{cite web |last=Allen |first=Julien |title=Simply the Worst: Edward D. Wood Jr.'s 'Glen or Glenda?' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2011/09/simply-the-worst-edward-d-wood-jr-s-glen-or-glenda-224683/ |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=September 7, 2011 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708193054/https://www.indiewire.com/2011/09/simply-the-worst-edward-d-wood-jr-s-glen-or-glenda-224683/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Richard Barrios described ''Glen or Glenda'' as "one of the funniest and worst movies ever made".<ref>Richard Barrios, ''Screened Out: Playing Gay in Hollywood from Edison to Stonewall'', Psychology Press, 2003, {{ISBN|0-415-92328-X}}, Page 235.</ref> | |||
'']'' was renowned director's ]'s musical homage to great 1930s Hollywood musicals. It features 16 songs by ] and stars ] and ]. Upon release it received a slew of very negative reviews. '']'' film critic ] said, "it may be the worst movie musical of this--or any-- decade."<ref name=PictureShows>{{cite book | last =Yule | first =Andrew | title =Picture shows: the life and films of Peter Bogdanovich | publisher =] | date =1992 | location = | pages =90 | isbn =0879101539}}</ref> '']'' film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time." <ref name="BufNews">{{cite news |title=Wisecrack Addicts Laughing at the Not-So-Bad |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BN&p_theme=bn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF994638769706&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM |publisher= '']'' |date= May 24, 1996| author =Simon, Jeff }} </ref> It was included in the books '']'' and Michael Sauter's book ''The Worst Films of All Time''.<ref name=50worst>{{cite book | last =Medved | first =Harry | title =The fifty worst films of all time:(and how they got that way) | publisher =] | date =1978 | location = | pages =37 | isbn =0445041390}}</ref> The ''Encyclopedia of American Cinema for Smartphones and Mobile Devices'' noted it was "panned by critics as one of the worst films ever made." <ref name=EncyAmCin>{{cite book | last = | first = | title =Encyclopedia of American Cinema for Smartphones and Mobile Devices | publisher =MobileReference | date =2007 | location = | pages = | isbn =1605011452}}</ref> It is also included in '']''.<ref name=Goldenturkeys>{{cite book | last =Medved | first =Michael | title =] | publisher =] | date =1980 | location = | pages =209 | isbn =039950463X}}</ref> Film critic ] said it's "regarded as the great ] catastrophe of its time."<ref name=SinginANewTune>{{cite book | last =Muir | first =John Kenneth | title =Singing a new tune:the rebirth of the modern film musical, from Evita to De-lovely and beyond | publisher =] | date =2005 | location = | pages =58 | isbn =1557836108}}</ref> Bogdanovich, who was also the screenwriter, sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for this film.<ref name=SinginANewTune/> | |||
=== ''Robot Monster'' (1953) === | |||
==1980s== | |||
{{Main|Robot Monster{{!}}''Robot Monster''}} | |||
==='']'' (1980)=== | |||
''Robot Monster'' is a ] produced and directed by ] and originally shot and exhibited in ]. Its title character, which is "a man in a gorilla suit wearing what looks like a diving helmet sprouting TV antennae", was given the Most Ridiculous Monster in Screen History award in ''The Golden Turkey Awards''.<ref name="newcastlerobot"/> It is also featured in '']''{{'}} 10 worst movies list,{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} ''The Fifty Worst Films of All Time'' and Michael Sauter's book ''The Worst Movies of All Time''.{{sfn|Sauter|page=326}}<ref name="newcastlerobot">{{cite web |last=Cerabona |first=Ron |title=So bad it's good: retro sci-fi's monster appeal |url=https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/449342/so-bad-its-good-retro-sci-fis-monster-appeal/ |website=] |access-date=July 22, 2022 |language=en-AU |date=October 30, 2012 |archive-date=July 22, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220722140503/https://www.newcastleherald.com.au/story/449342/so-bad-its-good-retro-sci-fis-monster-appeal/ |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Robot Monster'' was featured in an episode of the movie-mocking TV show '']'',<ref name="newcastlerobot"/> as well as ''Canned Film Festival''.<ref name="cannedfilm"/> The film is remembered fondly by horror novelist ], who quotes, and agrees with, a review in '']'' magazine ("certainly among the finest terrible movies ever made", "one of the most laughable ] quickies").<ref>{{cite book |first=Stephen |last=King |author-link=Stephen King |title=Danse Macabre |year=1981 |publisher=Everest House |location=New York |isbn=978-0-89696-076-3|title-link=Danse Macabre (book) }}</ref> Chris Barsanti in ''The Sci-Fi Movie Guide'' writes: " gives ''Plan 9 From Outer Space'' a run as the worst movie of all time."<ref>{{cite book |last=Barsanti |first=Chris |title=The Sci-Fi Movie Guide: The Universe of Film from Alien to Zardoz |date=2014 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1578595334 |pages=312}}</ref> | |||
This ] epic, based on the ] in 1890s ], was plagued by massive cost and time overruns, largely due to director ]'s extreme attention to detail. He demanded 50 takes of at least one scene, and refused to start shooting for another until a cloud he liked rolled across the sky. It cost over $44 million, but only brought in $3.5 million at the box office.<ref>. CNBC. Retrieved 2011-09-07.</ref> The original version ran at nearly four hours, but was yanked from release after only one week due to scathing reviews. It later resurfaced in a 149-minute version, but by then the damage was done. ] famously called it "an unqualified disaster," among other things. ] called it "the most scandalous cinematic waste I've ever seen."<ref>] (1981). . '']''. Retrieved 2011-09-07.</ref> Cimino won the 1980 ], and the film was nominated for four more Razzies, including Worst Picture.<ref></ref> In February 2010, the readers of '']'' voted it the 6th worst film of all time.<ref>. ] (London). February 3, 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-15.</ref> That same year, ] of '']'' also called it the worst film ever made, saying that much of it was "beyond belief."<ref>] (March 21, 2008). . '']'' (London, England). Retrieved 2011-09-07.</ref> Cimino was initially thought to be a director on the rise after directing '']'' (which won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director), but his reputation never recovered after ''Heaven's Gate''. The film also effectively ended the existence of ], as an independent Hollywood studio; its parent firm sold the company to ], where it still operates. | |||
==='' |
=== ''The Conqueror'' (1956) === | ||
{{Main|The Conqueror (1956 film){{!}}''The Conqueror'' (1956 film)}} | |||
''Mommie Dearest'' was based on the ] by ] about her upbringing by ]. It was the first film to sweep the ]s. It won five Razzies including "Worst Picture" and Worst Actress (], shared with ]).<ref name=SGTW>{{cite book | last =Adams | first =Michael | title =Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies:A Film Critic's Year-Long Quest to Find the Worst Movie Ever Made | publisher =] | year =2010 | location = | pages =188 | isbn =0061806293}}</ref> The same organization also named it "Worst Picture of the Decade."<ref name="GR1">{{cite news | url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=12 | title=Decade's Worst -The 80's| author=Wilson, John| publisher='']''| date=March 15, 1990}}</ref> The film is part of the "100 most awful" in the book '']''.<ref name="OFMG">{{cite news | url=http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/2005-02-24-razzies_x.htm| title=Razzies still knocking Hollywood down a peg after 25 years | author= | publisher='']'' / '']''| date=February 24, 2005}}</ref><ref name=ORG>{{cite book | last =Wilson | first =John | title =The official Razzie movie guide: enjoying the best of Hollywood's worst | publisher =] | year =2005 | location = | pages = | isbn =0446693340}}</ref> Entertainment writer Michael Sauter included the film in his book ''The Worst Movies of All Time''.<ref name=WMOAT>{{cite book | last =Sauter | first =Michael. | title =The worst movies of all time, or, What were they thinking? | publisher =Carol Publishing | year =1999 | location = | pages = | isbn =0806520787}}</ref> The film earned, as film critic and television host ] put it, "some of the nastiest reviews ever."<ref name=RW>{{cite book | last =Crouse | first =Richard | title =Reel Winners: Movie Award Trivia | publisher =] | year =2005 | location = | pages =123 | isbn =1550025740}}</ref> Writing for the '']'', film critic ] wrote of this film, "I can't imagine who would want to subject themselves to this movie. "Mommie Dearest" is a painful experience that drones on endlessly, as ]'s relationship with her daughter, Christina, disintegrates from cruelty through jealousy into pathos."<ref> Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times, January 1, 1981</ref> Of the performance of ], '']'' said "Dunaway does not chew scenery. Dunaway starts neatly at each corner of the set in every scene and swallows it whole, costars and all."<ref> Variety, Jan. 1, 1981</ref> | |||
] '']'' featured ] as Asian warlord ], cited as one of the most miscast roles ever.<ref name="terrible10"/>]] | |||
] funded '']'', an ] featuring ] as ]n chieftain ] and the redheaded ] as a ] princess. The movie was filmed near ], downwind from a ] in ], and is often blamed for the ] deaths of many of the cast and crew, including Hayward, Wayne, ], ], and director ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Cecil |title=Did John Wayne die of cancer caused by a radioactive movie set? |publisher=The Straight Dope |date=October 26, 1984 |url=http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_016.html |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=July 3, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080703225341/http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_016.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> In addition to filming near the testing range, truckloads of the red sands were transported back to the studios for interior scenes<ref name="telekhan"/> and by 1980, 91 of the 220 (over 41%) cast and crew members had been diagnosed with cancer.<ref name=geng>{{cite news|last=von Tunzelmann|first=Alex|title=The Conqueror: Hollywood gives Genghis Khan a kicking he won't forget|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2013/may/03/the-conqueror-hollywood-genghis-khan|newspaper=The Guardian|date=May 3, 2013|location=London|access-date=December 12, 2016|archive-date=June 23, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130623112047/http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2013/may/03/the-conqueror-hollywood-genghis-khan|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The film made the ten-worst list in ''The Book of Lists'',{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} appears in Michael Sauter's ''The Worst Movies of All Time'',{{sfn|Sauter|page=68–71}} and was among those listed in ''The Fifty Worst Films of All Time''. Additionally, the '']'' described ''The Conqueror'' as the worst ever made and '']'' listed it as the worst biopic ever made.<ref>{{cite web |last=Grewal |first=Joti |title=Former Aldergrove Star editor releases book, soon-to-be documentary about 'worst movie ever made' |url=https://www.aldergrovestar.com/home/former-aldergrove-star-editor-releases-book-soon-to-be-documentary-about-worst-movie-ever-made/ |website=] |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=September 27, 2021 |archive-date=March 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307010926/https://www.aldergrovestar.com/home/former-aldergrove-star-editor-releases-book-soon-to-be-documentary-about-worst-movie-ever-made/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Barone |first=Matt |title=The 10 Worst Biopic Movies Of All Time |work=] |date=November 12, 2012 |url=http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/11/10-worst-biopic-movies-of-all-time/ |access-date=July 7, 2017 |archive-date=August 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813211848/http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/11/10-worst-biopic-movies-of-all-time/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' called the choice of Wayne for Khan – a role originally written for ] – "one of the worst casting decisions of all time".<ref name="geng"/> Wayne lamented taking the role, stating, "Don't make an ass of yourself trying to play parts you are not suited for."<ref name="telekhan">{{cite web |last=Bell |first=Chris |title=The movie so toxic it killed John Wayne: the tragedy of The Conqueror |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/movie-toxic-killed-john-wayne-tragedy-conqueror/ |website=] |access-date=July 23, 2022 |date=January 17, 2017 |archive-date=July 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220708152313/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/movie-toxic-killed-john-wayne-tragedy-conqueror/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' writes: "by absolutely every conceivable metric – financially, critically, historically, ethnically, and even body count – it would come to be known as one of the biggest disasters in cinematic history."<ref name="telekhan"/> '']'' described the film as the worst decision in movie history.<ref name="50decisions">{{cite magazine |last=Greene |first=Andy |title=The 50 Worst Decisions in Movie History |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-lists/the-50-worst-decisions-in-movie-history-1234824872/the-conqueror-casts-john-wayne-as-genghis-khan-films-on-a-nuclear-testing-site-1234827135/ |magazine=] |access-date=October 25, 2023 |date=September 25, 2023 |archive-date=October 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001221023/https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-lists/the-50-worst-decisions-in-movie-history-1234824872/the-conqueror-casts-john-wayne-as-genghis-khan-films-on-a-nuclear-testing-site-1234827135/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==='']'' (1982)=== | |||
This ], directed by ] and starring ] as General ], was meant to be a depiction of the ] during the ]. Producer Mitsuharu Ishii was a senior member of the Japanese branch of the ], whose leader, ], claimed he had the film made to show MacArthur's spirituality and connection to God and the Japanese people.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://en.wikisource.org/U.S._v._Sun_Myung_Moon_532_F.Supp._1360_%281982%29 |title=U.S. v. Sun Myung Moon 532 F.Supp. 1360 (1982) – Wikisource |publisher=En.wikisource.org |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The film's eventual production cost of $46 million resulted in a $5 million box office gross, and the '']'' review written by ] calls the movie "the most expensive B-movie ever."<ref>{{cite news |title=Inchon (1981) 'INCHON,' AT LAST |author=Vincent Canby |url=http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A03E0D8123BF934A2575AC0A964948260 |work=The New York Times |date=1982-09-17}}</ref> Every conceivable kind of problem plagued production, including labor issues, the U.S. military withdrawing support due to the film's Unification Church connection, weather and natural disasters, customs difficulties, expensive directorial blunders, and the original director (]) quitting before the start of production. Olivier's performance was roundly panned and he was awarded the ] for Worst Actor.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=332&PN=3 |title=1982 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners" – The Official RAZZIE® Forum |publisher=Razzies.com |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The film itself took the 1982 Razzies for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and Young's direction earned him a tie for Worst Director of 1982. ''Inchon'' was later profiled in multiple books on worst in film, including '']'' by Harry and ],<ref>{{cite book |last=Medved |first=Harry |coauthors=] |title=] |publisher=Perigee Books |location=], ] |year=1984 |pages=189–197 |isbn=0399510605}}</ref> and ''The Worst Movies of All Time'' by Michael Sauter.<ref name="sauter">{{cite book |last=Sauter |first=Michael |title=The Worst Movies of All Time: Or, What Were They Thinking? |publisher=] |year=1999 |page=197 |isbn=0806520787}}</ref> To date, ''Inchon'' has never been released on home video in the United States. | |||
Hughes, one of the world's wealthiest people at the time, had previously produced the successful dramatic films '']'', '']'', and '']''.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/5/newsid_4739000/4739940.stm |title=BBC On This Day | 5 | 1976: Billionaire Howard Hughes dies |work=BBC News |date=April 7, 1976 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=December 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216160139/http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/5/newsid_4739000/4739940.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> After viewing ''The Conqueror'', Hughes bought every existing print for $12 million and refused to let the film be seen on TV until 1974, reportedly out of guilt over the decision to shoot at such a hazardous location.<ref>{{cite book |title=My Year of Flops |last=Rubin |first=Nathan |year=2010 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-4391-5312-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/myyearofflopsavc0000rabi }}</ref> This was the last film Hughes produced.<ref name="telekhan"/> | |||
==='']'' (1986)=== | |||
This film is loosely based on ], which was created by ] and artist ], and stars ], ], and ]. The film retains only two central characters: the ] duck and ], and makes no effort to have them look or behave similarly to their counterparts from the comics. In his ''Movie Guide'', ] calls the film a "hopeless mess of a movie".<ref>{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |authorlink=Leonard Maltin |title=Leonard Maltin's 2008 Movie Guide |publisher=New American Library |page=638}}</ref> The film was also among ] picks for the "Worst Films of 1986".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-4556527.html |title=Siskel and Ebert and the ten best and worst movies of 1986. |publisher=Highbeam.com |date=1986-12-10 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The film was adapted by ] and his wife ] and directed by Huyck, with no input from Gerber, who "was hoping against hope that the script and the movie itself weren't as bad as thought they were or, at least, that they wouldn't be received as badly as thought they would ," citing that many films he ''hated'' were at least successful.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zilianidavide.wordpress.com/page/3/ |title=zilianidavide |publisher=Zilianidavide.wordpress.com |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> Huyck and Katz were once considered "luminaries".<ref>{{cite book |last=Keyser |first=Les |title=Martin Scorsese |publisher=Twayne Publishers |location=], ] |year=1995 |isbn=080579315 |page=65}}</ref> The film was considered so bad, that it was soon dubbed "''Howard the Turkey''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.skymovies.com/skymovies/article/0,,80008-11019000,00.html |title=Howard the Duck |publisher=Sky Movies |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The film won four Razzies: Worst Picture, New Star, Visual Effects, and Screenplay.<ref>{{cite web |last=Wilson |first=John |title=1986 Archive|url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=25 |publisher=] |accessdate=2009-10-11}}</ref> It is also in the Top 10 of the 100 worst movies list at DigitalDreamDoor.com.<ref name="Digital100">{{cite web |url=http://digitaldreamdoor.nutsie.com/pages/movie-pages/movie_worst.html |title=100 Worst Movies |publisher=DigitalDreamDoor.com |date= |accessdate=2009-10-22}}</ref> Over the years, however, the film has gained its own dedicated cult following. Ed Gale, who was credited as playing Howard in the duck suit, said in the DVD extras documentary ''Releasing the Duck'' that he receives more ] as Howard the Duck than he does as ], the main ] in the commercially successful '']'' horror film series.<ref name="Release-2">{{cite video |people=Thompson, Lea; Jones, Jeffry; Gale, Ed |date=2009 |title=Releasing the Duck |format=documentary |medium=DVD |publisher=''Universal Home Video'' |accessdate={{start date|2009|10|6}} |isbn=025195052306}}</ref> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Fire Maidens from Outer Space'' (1956) === | ||
{{Main|Fire Maidens from Outer Space{{!}}''Fire Maidens from Outer Space''}} | |||
The film is a live-action adaptation of the then-popular, yet controversial ], itself a gross-out parody of the ] dolls. The title characters are depicted by dwarf actors in low budget costumes, with poorly functioning mouths and expressionless faces. The film is often criticized for its ], nonsensical plot, poor explanations, bad acting, and the creepy appearance of the Garbage Pail Kids. It has a 0% rating on ]<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=garbage_pail_kids_movie|title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie}}</ref> and Caryn James of the '']'' said the movie is "too repulsive for children or adults of any age" and is "enough to make you believe in strict and faraway boarding schools."<ref>{{cite news |first=Caryn |last=James |url=http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DE1D81030F931A1575BC0A961948260 |title='Movie Review – The Garbage Pail Kids Movie' |publisher='']'' |accessdate=6 Jun 2010 |date=1987-08-28}}</ref> Carlos Coto of the '']'' said that "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie is one of the worst ever made".<ref>{{cite web |url =http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1987-09-05/features/8703110946_1_garbage-pail-kids-cabbage-patch-kids-kids-show |title=Trashy `Garbage Pail Kids` Has No Value |publisher='']'' |accessdate=29 Sep 2010 |date=1987-09-05}}</ref> Much of its content is said to be inappropriate for children, its intended audience. Throughout the movie, the Garbage Pail Kids steal, get in fights, bite toes off people, fart in people's faces, threaten others with switch blades, and run over cars. Some have pointed out that the movie contradicts its own message, that people should be judged by their behavior, not their appearance.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheGarbagePailKidsMovie |title='The Garbage Pail Kids Movie – Tropes & Idioms' |publisher='']'' |accessdate=6 Jun 2010}}</ref> In addition to scatological behavior, the movie has several scenes that feature sexual images, violence, and drinking. Offended parents launched a nation-wide protest of the movie that successfully resulted in the movie being withdrawn from circulation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.allmovie.com/work/the-garbage-pail-kids-movie-19217 |title='The Garbage Pail Kids Movie > Overview' |publisher='']'' |accessdate=6 Jun 2010}}</ref> The shortened release contributed to the movie's poor gross of only $1,576,615.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garbagepailkids.htm |title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987) - Box Office Mojo |publisher=Boxofficemojo.com |accessdate=7 March 2011}}</ref> It was nominated for three ]s at the ]: Worst Visual Effects, Worst New Star for the Garbage Pail Kids collectively, and Worst Song. | |||
''Fire Maidens from Outer Space'', a low-budget British ] film (known in the US as ''Fire Maidens of Outer Space''), is about a group of astronauts visiting an all-female society on a moon of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dvddrive-in.com/reviews/e-h/firemaidensofouterspaceblu56.htm|title=Fire Maidens of Outer Space|website=dvddrive-in.com|access-date=July 18, 2021|archive-date=June 3, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210603133337/http://dvddrive-in.com/reviews/e-h/firemaidensofouterspaceblu56.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> This film developed a negative reputation for its poor special effects (including a scene on the alien planet in which an automobile is visible driving past).<ref name="dt">{{Cite web |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/61441/fire-maidens-of-outer-space/ |title=Fire Maidens Of Outer Space |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200812024858/https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/61441/fire-maidens-of-outer-space/ |archive-date=August 12, 2020 |work=DVD Talk |date=August 13, 2013 |access-date=January 21, 2014}}</ref> Leslie Halliwell described ''Fire Maidens from Outer Space'' as "a strong contender for the title of the worst movie ever made, with diaphanously clad English gals striking embarrassed poses against cardboard sets".<ref>John Walker (ed.) ''Halliwell's Film and Video Guide 2000'', London and New York; HarperCollins, 1999, {{ISBN|0-06-273645-0}} (p.287).</ref> British film historian I.Q. Hunter included it in his list of candidates for "the worst British film ever made".<ref name="iqh">I. Q Hunter, "From Window Cleaner to Potato Man" in ''British Comedy Cinema'', edited by I.Q. Hunter and Laraine Porter. Routledge, 2012. {{ISBN|0-415-66667-8}}. (p.154)</ref> The ] website's review claimed it "may be among the worst-ever professionally produced science fiction films".<ref name="dt"/> Paul Welsh of the '']'' wrote that it was "probably the worst ever produced".<ref>{{cite web |last=Welsh |first=Paul |title=The worst film ever made? |url=https://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/news/19747083.fire-maidens-outer-space---worst-film-ever-made/ |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=November 28, 2021 |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710191835/https://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/news/19747083.fire-maidens-outer-space---worst-film-ever-made/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In his book ''Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies'', David L. Robb wrote that the film's director ] is "widely regarded as one of the worst filmmakers of all time", adding that, out of the three films he made, "the worst was ''Fire Maidens from Outer Space''...which is often cited as one of the ten worst movies ever made".<ref>{{cite book |last=Robb |first=David L. |title=Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies |date=2004 |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, NY |isbn=9781591021827 |page=321 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j1wbAQAAIAAJ |access-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172902/https://books.google.com/books?id=j1wbAQAAIAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Plan 9 from Outer Space'' (1957) === | ||
{{Main|Plan 9 from Outer Space{{!}}''Plan 9 from Outer Space''}} | |||
This film by ], widely considered to be a blatant ] capitalizing on the popularity of the 1984 film '']'', was made infamous after it debuted on '']''. It is on the IMDb's Bottom 100 list,<ref name="IMDB100"/> and at its lowest rating, it repeatedly made number two, second only to '']''. ''MST3K'' writer ] later commented on ''Hobgoblins'', saying, “It shoots right to the top of the list of the worst movies we’ve ever done." Greg Muskewitz at Efilmcritic.com called it "]'s worst nightmare."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=4694&reviewer=172&highlight=hobgoblins |title=Movie Review – Hobgoblins |publisher=eFilmCritic |date=1987-06-02 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> Hobgoblins is also one of the few films considered the worst of all time to have spawned a sequel—'']'', made twenty years after the original. | |||
]) attacks Eros (]) in the 1957 ] classic '']''.]] | |||
]'s ''Plan 9 from Outer Space'', a ] film about aliens resurrecting the dead, was labeled the "Worst Film Ever" by ''The Golden Turkey Awards'' in 1980.<ref name="Rabin9">{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |title=Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #126 Plan 9 From Outer Space (1957) |url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2020/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-126-plan-9-from-outer-space-1957 |website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=September 16, 2020 |archive-date=October 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010212057/https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2020/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-126-plan-9-from-outer-space-1957 |url-status=live }}</ref> Wood shot only a small amount of unrelated footage featuring top-billed star ] before his death. Wood incorporated the footage into the film and cast ] as Lugosi's stand-in; Mason, a personal acquaintance of Wood, bore little resemblance to Lugosi and played his scenes holding the character's cape in front of his face. Although ''Golden Turkey Awards'' author Michael Medved credits Lugosi's top billing with its enduring legacy,<ref>{{cite web |last=Liebenson |first=Donald |title=Plan 9 from Outer Space Lands in TCM Classic Film Festival |url=https://www.tcm.com/articles/Article/021336/plan-9-from-outer-space-lands-in-tcm-classic-film-festival/ |date=May 7, 2021 |access-date=July 10, 2022 |publisher=] |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710104952/https://www.tcm.com/articles/Article/021336/plan-9-from-outer-space-lands-in-tcm-classic-film-festival/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' listed various other shortcomings: "A ] dangling in the sky has been variously said to be either a car hubcap or a paper plate. Actors read from scripts on their lap; sound microphones wobble in and out of shot. Fake trees and cemetery headstones wobble as the actors brush past them. Characters go into scenes when it's night time and leave five minutes later into daylight. ... the plot itself appears to be the product of insanity."<ref name="independent9">{{cite web |last=Barnett |first=David |title=In defence of the so-called Worst Movie Ever Made |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/in-defence-of-the-socalled-worst-movie-ever-made-plan-9-from-outer-space-a7660961.html |website=] |access-date=August 3, 2022 |language=en |date=March 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 3, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220803103027/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/in-defence-of-the-socalled-worst-movie-ever-made-plan-9-from-outer-space-a7660961.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
] notes the film has been dubbed "the epitome of so-bad-it's-good cinema" and has gained a ] since appearing in ''The Golden Turkey Awards''.<ref>{{cite web |last=Levy |first=Emanuel |author-link=Emanuel Levy |title=Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959) |url=https://emanuellevy.com/review/plan-9-from-outer-space-1959-ed-woods-sci-fi-horror/ |website=emanuellevy.com |access-date=July 11, 2022 |date=February 1, 2021 |archive-date=July 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220711095637/https://emanuellevy.com/review/plan-9-from-outer-space-1959-ed-woods-sci-fi-horror/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' author ] wrote that: "It's hard to overstate the role ''Plan 9 From Outer Space'' and its eccentric creator have played in the birth and evolution of bad movie culture... ''Plan 9'' was the original best worst movie."<ref name="Rabin9"/> ] writer Nicholas Barber wrote that "it stands as the epitome of cinematic awfulness. And that's why so many people love it."<ref name="BBC9">{{cite web |last=Barber |first=Nicholas |title=Is this the worst film ever made? |url=https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220107-is-this-the-worst-film-ever-made |publisher=] |access-date=July 21, 2022 |date=January 10, 2022 |language=en |archive-date=July 20, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220720114337/https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220107-is-this-the-worst-film-ever-made |url-status=live }}</ref> Glenn Kenny of '']'' and ''The ] Guide to Films'' each described it as the worst movie ever made,<ref>''Radio Times Guide to Films 2014''. '']'', London, 2013. {{ISBN|0-9567523-6-5}} (p.947).</ref><ref name="glennkenny"/> and ] wrote: "''Plan 9 from Outer Space'' was the undisputed best worst movie ever made for decades until films like '']'' and '']'' got notorious, and it's still a legitimate contender".<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies"/> | |||
==='']'' (1988)=== | |||
The film is about a young boy in a wheelchair who meets and befriends an alien who has crash landed on earth. The decision to make the film was based on the success of '']'' (the title itself, ''Mac and Me'', comes from the working title for ''E.T.''—''E.T. and Me''.<ref name="rottentomatoes1">{{rotten-tomatoes|id=mac_and_me|title=Mac and Me}}</ref>), as well as to serve as a marketing vehicle for ] and ].<ref name="Maltin01211">{{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |authorlink=Leonard Maltin |title=Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2004 |publisher=Signet |year=2003 |isbn=0451209400}}</ref> One scene in the film is a large, impromptu dance-off with the main character MAC the alien (dressed in a teddy bear costume), a football team, ], and various other people inside and outside of a McDonald's restaurant. The film's cast list states "and Ronald McDonald as Himself." ''Mac and Me'' has a rating of 0% on Rotten Tomatoes,<ref name="rottentomatoes1"/> and ] referred to it as "more like a TV commercial than a movie".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> Scott Weinberg of eFilmcritic.com called it "Quite possibly one of the worst movies of the past 435 years"<ref name="rottentomatoes1"/> and Marjorie Baumgarten of the '']'' called it a "shameless E.T. knockoff".<ref name="rottentomatoes1"/> The film was nominated for four ] including Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay and won two trophies, Worst Director for ] (tied with ] for '']'') and Worst New Star for Ronald McDonald in a small cameo. | |||
It holds a 66% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 38 reviews, with the consensus stating that it is "justly celebrated for its staggering ineptitude".<ref>{{cite web |title=Plan 9 From Outer Space |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space |website=] |access-date=July 21, 2022 |publisher=] |language=en |archive-date=November 14, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114165703/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Phil Hall of '']'' contends that the film is "far too entertaining to be considered as the very worst film ever made",<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/reviews/|title=Plan 9 from Outer Space – Movie Reviews|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 16, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416083129/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/plan-9-from-outer-space/reviews/|url-status=live}}</ref> and ] states that, "The worst thing you can say about a film is that it's boring, and ''Plan 9'' is a fairly entertaining movie."<ref name="independent9"/> Although ''Flavorwire'' included it on its list of the 50 worst movies ever made (in the 50th spot), writer Jason Bailey described ''The Golden Turkey Awards''{{'}}s assessment of it as "a label that stuck" and opined that he did not think it was even Wood's worst film.<ref name="Flavorwire"/> Likewise, John Wirt of ''The Advocate'' goes as far as to call it "the ultimate cult flick",<ref name=":2"/> and ''Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics'' states, "In fact, the film has become so famous for its own badness that it's now beyond criticism."<ref>{{cite book |last=Schwartz |first=Carol |title=Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics |publisher=Visible Ink Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-7876-0616-9}}</ref> Barber credits ''Plan 9''{{'}}s cult following to the film having some "halfway decent" elements, such as the film's title and screen presence of actors ] and ], while film historian Rodney F. Hill considers the film to be a "campy, cult masterpiece" with a "minimalist ] aesthetic".<ref name="BBC9"/> | |||
==1990s== | |||
==='']'' (1990)=== | |||
Notable in part for not featuring any trolls (the antagonists are goblins from the town of Nilbog – which is ] spelled backwards), and for not having anything to do with '']'', which was also critically panned.<ref>Janet Maslin, ''The New York Times'', January 17, 1986; Patricia Smith, ''The Chicago Sun-Times'', January 20, 1986; Alan Carter, ''The New York Daily News'', January 17, 1986; Rex Reed, January 17, 1986</ref> (It was released overseas as ''Goblins'', but in the US as ''Troll 2'' in an attempt to capitalize on ''Troll'''s "popularity".){{POV-statement|date=April 2011}} Not only one of the "least scary horror movies ever", according to ], but "by pretty much any measure... one of the worst films ever made".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/collections/gallery/1200/top-10-least-scary-horror-movies/fp#photo9/ |title=Fright Free: 10 Least Scary Horror Movies |publisher=Movies.yahoo.com |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> Director ] (who used the pseudonym Drake Floyd for his work on the film) has maintained for twenty years that the film is a "masterpiece." Despite the script being written in awkward language (Fragasso and his wife Rosella Drudi, native Italians, spoke virtually no English when they wrote the script), Fragasso insisted the American actors deliver the lines as written. The goblins in the movie are ] wearing burlap sacks and latex masks. ] acting, confusing plot twists, and unintentional homosexual innuendos have contributed to give the movie a cult status comparable to '']''. Nearly twenty years after its release, the movie's child star, Michael Stephenson, made a documentary about the film titled '']'', released to critical success in 2009. ''Troll 2'' remains on the IMDb bottom 100.<ref name="IMDB100"/> ] and ] produced an audio commentary track for the movie for ]. | |||
== 1960s == | |||
==='']'' (1991)=== | |||
This sequel to the cult film '']'' was met with harsh criticism by both critics and audiences. Based on 23 reviews collected by Rotten Tomatoes, the film currently holds a 0%, "Rotten" rating; all 23 reviews being negative. Common criticisms included the lack of motivation for the characters, the new and seemingly incongruent origin for the Immortals, the resurrection of Ramirez, and apparent contradictions in the film's internal logic.<ref name="jabootu.com"></ref> ] of the '']'' gave the film a score of 0.5 star (out of four), saying: "''Highlander II: The Quickening'' is the most hilariously incomprehensible movie I've seen in many a long day—a movie almost awesome in its badness. Wherever science fiction fans gather, in decades and generations to come, this film will be remembered in hushed tones as one of the immortal low points of the genre." He continued saying "If there is a planet somewhere whose civilization is based on the worst movies of all time, "Highlander 2: The Quickening" deserves a sacred place among their most treasured artifacts."<ref>, Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times, November 1, 1991</ref> Giving the film a score of 2 out of 10, ]'s review of the film said: "How bad is this movie? Well, imagine if ] were alive today, and someone gave him a multi-million dollar budget. See his imagination running rampant, bringing in aliens from outer space with immensely powerful firearms, immortals who bring each other back to life by calling out their names, epic duels on flying skateboards, and a blatant disregard for anything logical or previously established—now you are starting to get closer to the vision of ''Highlander II''.<ref>, IGN, June 16, 2000</ref> Awarding the film one star out of five, ] of FilmCritic.com said, "''Highlander'' has become a bit of a joke, and here's where the joke started. ... Incomprehensible doesn't even begin to explain it. This movie is the equivalent of the 'Hey, look over there!' gag. You look, and the guy you wanted to beat up has run away and hid."<ref>, Christopher Null, FilmCritic.com, 2004</ref> | |||
=== ''The Creeping Terror'' (1964) === | |||
In 1995, the film's director ] made a ] version known as ''Highlander II: The Renegade Version'' and then later released another version simply known as ''Highlander II: The Special Edition'' for its 2004 DVD release. The film was reconstructed on both occasions largely from existing material, with certain scenes removed and others added back in, and the entire sequence of events changed. Currently ''Highlander 2'' has a rating of 3.7 at the Internet Movie Database.<ref>{{IMDb title|102034|Highlander II: The Quickening}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|The Creeping Terror{{!}}''The Creeping Terror''}} | |||
The science-fiction/horror film ''The Creeping Terror'' was directed, produced, and edited by Vic Savage (under the pseudonym A.J. Nelson or Arthur Nelson,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://talkfilmsociety.com/columns/schlock-value-the-creeping-terror-1964|title=Schlock Value: The Creeping Terror (1964)|website=Talk Film Society|date=September 11, 2017|access-date=February 1, 2022|archive-date=February 1, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201235735/https://talkfilmsociety.com/columns/schlock-value-the-creeping-terror-1964|url-status=live}}</ref> but kept his name when credited as an actor). The movie is about a large slug-like alien that lands on Earth and terrorizes a small town in California.<ref>Medved, Harry and Michael (1986). ''Son of Golden Turkey Awards''. New York: Random House/Villard Books. {{ISBN|0-394-74341-5}}. p. 197.</ref> The film is memorable for its use of some bargain-basement effects: stock footage of a rocket launch played in reverse to depict the landing of an alien spacecraft, and the "monster" appears to be composed of a length of shag carpet draped over several actors. Notably, the creature's victims inexplicably stand perfectly still as the slow-moving monster approaches them. | |||
'']'' declared it "widely considered the worst picture ever made", calling ''Plan 9 From Outer Space'' "a bona fide magnum opus" compared to ''The Creeping Terror''.<ref>{{cite web |last=Alexander |first=Chris |title=Creep Behind the Camera Blu-ray Review |url=https://www.comingsoon.net/horror/reviews/886917-the-creep-behind-the-camera-blu-ray-review |website=] |access-date=February 2, 2022 |date=September 12, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220202022353/https://www.comingsoon.net/horror/reviews/886917-the-creep-behind-the-camera-blu-ray-review |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' and ] also report that it has a reputation as being one of the worst films ever made.<ref name="montgaz"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Synapse Films Getting Creepy This September with Dario Argento's Creepers, The Creep Behind the Camera, and The Creeping Terror Blu-rays |url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/236216/synapse-films-getting-creepy-september-dario-argentos-creepers-creep-behind-camera-creeping-terror-blu-rays/ |website=] |access-date=February 2, 2022 |date=June 21, 2017 |archive-date=February 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220202000344/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/236216/synapse-films-getting-creepy-september-dario-argentos-creepers-creep-behind-camera-creeping-terror-blu-rays/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The film was featured in ''The Golden Turkey Awards'',{{sfn|Golden Turkey Awards|pages=18}} and its follow-up book, ''Son of Golden Turkey Awards''.<ref name="montgaz">{{cite web |title=Fantasia 2014: The Creep Behind the Camera was scarier than the carpet monster from outer space |url=https://montrealgazette.com/entertainment/movies/fantasia-2014-the-creep-behind-the-camera-was-scarier-than-the-carpet-monster-from-outer-space |website=] |access-date=February 2, 2022 |language=en-CA |archive-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201235307/https://montrealgazette.com/entertainment/movies/fantasia-2014-the-creep-behind-the-camera-was-scarier-than-the-carpet-monster-from-outer-space |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'' featured ''The Creeping Terror'' in its sixth season and British film magazine '']'' included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.<ref name="TotalFilm"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the-creeping-terror-dangerous-charter-the-crawling-monster/ |title=The Creeping Terror (Dangerous Charter) (The Crawling Monster) |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=October 14, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014100058/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the-creeping-terror-dangerous-charter-the-crawling-monster/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==='']'' (1994)=== | |||
This ] film is a film adaption of the novel ''North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents'' by ], who also wrote the screenplay and has a minor role in the film. ''North'', which is also ]'s debut film, was a critical and commercial failure, earning only $7,138,449 worldwide. The film was widely criticized for its plot, its all-star cast of insensitive characters, lack of humor, and portrayal of numerous ethnic stereotypes. Based on 19 reviews, the film has an 11% approval rating at ] as of March 2011.<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=North Movie Reviews, Pictures - Rotten Tomatoes |publisher=Rottentomatoes.com |date= |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/north/ |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> Roger Ebert gave the film zero stars and, in his review, famously wrote "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it." He continued saying "''North'' is a bad film – one of the worst movies ever made,"<ref>{{cite news| url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940722/REVIEWS/407220302/1023 | work=Chicago Sun-Times | title=North}}</ref> and is also on his list of most hated films.<ref name="eberthated"/> Both Roger Ebert and ] named ''North'' as the worst film of 1994.<ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |title=The Official Site of Gene Siskel |publisher=Cmgww.com |date= |url=http://www.cmgww.com/stars/siskel/screening_room/thumbs_down.htm |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> Mick LaSalle of the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' said in his review that "''North'' is director Rob Reiner's first flat-out failure, a sincerely wrought, energetically made picture that all the same crashes on takeoff. It's strange and oddly distasteful, at its best managing to be bad in some original and unexpected ways."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1995/01/06/dd59113.dtl | work=The San Francisco Chronicle | title=Rob Reiner's 'North' Is Distastefully Bad | date=2011-01-08}}</ref> ] named ''North'' as one of the 40 worst movies he has ever seen, saying that, "Of all the films on this list, ''North'' may be the most difficult to watch from start to finish."<ref>Richard Roeper, 10 Sure Signs a Movie Character is Doomed and Other Surprising Movie Lists, New York: Hyperion Books, 2003, pp. 66–67</ref> The film was nominated for the following ] Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Actor (], also for '']''), Worst Supporting Actress (]), Worst Supporting Actor (], also for '']''), Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay (] and ]) and is listed on the Top 50 of 100 worst films ever at DigitalDreamDoor, ranking at #16.<ref name="Digital100"/> | |||
A documentary directed by Pete Schuermann about the making of the film, ''The Creep Behind The Camera'', was released in 2014.<ref name="montgaz"/> | |||
==='']'' (1995)=== | |||
A large amount of hype was put behind promoting the sex and nudity in this ] film, but the results were critically derided.<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=showgirls|title=Showgirls}}</ref> Most of the hype revolved around the film's star, ], who only two years before had been one of the stars of the teenage ] '']'' (in which she played a young ]). The film won seven of the thirteen ]s for which it was nominated. The film also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and is in the Top 10 of the 100 worst movies list at DigitalDreamDoor.com.<ref name="Digital100"/> The film, however, has garnered a cult following over the years.<ref>{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Michael |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/showgirls/news/1868670/25_movies_so_bad_theyre_unmissable/ |title=25 Movies So Bad They're Unmissable |publisher=Rottentomatoes.com |date=2010-01-30 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The edited R-rated version removes much of the nudity and replaces it with story elements. ] broadcasts the film on television in their prime time schedule, but added digitally animated solid black underwear to hide breasts and genitalia. It has been broadcast by ] as part of their ''Movies That Rock'' series. | |||
==='' |
=== ''Santa Claus Conquers the Martians'' (1964) === | ||
{{Main|Santa Claus Conquers the Martians{{!}}''Santa Claus Conquers the Martians''}} | |||
Sort of a self-parody, this movie portrays the making of a movie considered extremely horrendous by its director (]). Since his name is ], taking his name off the credits is a logical impossibility, and he destroys all copies of the movie. Also starring ], ] winner ], and Oscar-nominated actors ] and ], this film was widely panned by critics upon its release. It won five ], including Worst Picture. With an estimated budget of $10 million, ''Burn Hollywood Burn'' only grossed approximately $52,850,<ref name=mojo>] Retrieved 2011.07.23]</ref> making it a tremendous ]. ] gave the film a zero out of four stars, calling it a "spectacularly bad film—incompetent, unfunny, ill-conceived, badly executed, lamely written, and acted by people who look trapped in the headlights."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19980227/REVIEWS/802270301/1023/ |title=An Alan Smithee Film Burn Hollywood Burn |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> It is also on his "most hated" list.<ref name="eberthated"/> In the documentary ''Directed by Alan Smithee'', director ] stated he had his credit replaced with the pseudonym Alan Smithee because he was so appalled with the botched final cut by the film's producers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hit-n-run.com/cgi/read_review.cgi?review=53399_wyldfyr |title=''Bad Movie Review: An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn'' |author=Daigle, Ned |accessdate=2007-10-13}}</ref> It was written by ] and at one point in the movie a character comments that the film-within-the-film was "worse than '']''", which was also written by Eszterhas. | |||
]'' is the only film to be featured on all three of the following shows: '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/rifftrax-a-guide-to-holiday-riffing/|title=RiffTrax: A Guide to Christmas and Holiday Episodes|date=December 18, 2020|website=Den of Geek|access-date=July 18, 2021|archive-date=July 18, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718210136/https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/rifftrax-a-guide-to-holiday-riffing/|url-status=live}}</ref>]] | |||
The sci-fi movie ''Santa Claus Conquers the Martians'' was the creation of TV director ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://vimeo.com/32952750|title=SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS (Nicholas Webster, 1964)|date=December 1, 2011|via=Vimeo|access-date=May 10, 2020|archive-date=May 17, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517185308/https://vimeo.com/32952750|url-status=live}}</ref> Because ] children only get to see ] on TV signals beamed from Earth, their parents decide to abduct Santa to make them happy. The film was criticized for its oddity and poor special effects. It is also known for starring a very young ].<ref name="ft1111">{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/features/1295/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121130200629/https://filmthreat.com/features/1295/|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 30, 2012|title=Film Threat – The Bootleg Files: "Santa Claus Conquers The Martians"|work=Filmthreat.com|access-date=May 4, 2012}}</ref> ] critic Nick Cramp described it as "possibly the worst film ever made".<ref>{{cite web |title=Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964) |publisher=] |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2000/12/11/santa_claus_conquers_the_martians_1964_review.shtml |last=Cramp |first=Nick |date=December 11, 2020 |access-date=March 25, 2020 |archive-date=June 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200630130524/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2000/12/11/santa_claus_conquers_the_martians_1964_review.shtml |url-status=live }}</ref> The film is cited on a 10-worst list in ''The Book of Lists'' and in ''The Fifty Worst Films of All Time''.{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} It has been featured in ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Santa Claus Conquers the Martians |work=TV.com |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/episode/46920/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;47/ |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=August 22, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822232331/http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/santa-claus-conquers-the-martians/episode/46920/summary.html?tag=ep_list%3Btitle%3B47%2F |url-status=dead }}</ref> ''Canned Film Festival'', ''Rifftrax'' and '']'' (another spin-off of ''MST3K'' that revisited the film in 2008).<ref name="cannedfilm"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://cinematictitanic.twinvision.com/products/ |title=Cinematic Titanic | The Store |work=Cinematictitanic.twinvision.com |date=October 11, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131015034626/https://cinematictitanic.twinvision.com/products/ |archive-date=October 15, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://shoutfactory.com/|title=Shout! Factory Store|website=Shout! Factory|access-date=October 1, 2023|archive-date=October 1, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001193317/https://shoutfactory.com/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies'' (1964) === | |||
==2000s== | |||
{{main|The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies{{!}}''The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies''}} | |||
==='']'' (2000)=== | |||
''The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies'' (sometimes shortened to ''The Incredibly Strange Creatures'') is a 1964 American monster movie written and directed by ]. Steckler also starred in the film, billed under the pseudonym "Cash Flagg". In the film, three friends visit a carnival and stumble onto a group of occultists and disfigured monsters. Produced on a $38,000 budget, much of it takes place at ] amusement park in ], which resembles ]'s ]. The film was billed as the first "monster musical", beating out '']'' by a mere month in release date. The ] ] wrote an appreciative 1973 ] about ''Incredibly Strange Creatures'' in which he tries to explain and justify the movie's value: "This flick doesn't just rebel against, or even disregard, standards of taste and art. In the universe inhabited by ''The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies'', such things as standards and responsibility have never been heard of. It is this lunar purity which largely imparts to the film its classic stature. Like '']'' and a very few others, it will remain as an artifact in years to come to which scholars and searchers for truth can turn and say, {{'}}''This'' was trash!{{'"}}<ref name="Bangs">{{cite book |last=Bangs |first=Lester |author-link = Lester Bangs |editor-first = Greil |editor-last = Marcus |title = Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung |year = 1987 |publisher = Random House |location = New York |isbn = 0-394-53896-X |chapter = The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, or, The Day The Airwaves Erupted |page = 122}}</ref> The 2004 DVD ''The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made'' listed this film as the worst film of all time.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Grobaty|first=Tim|title=Location Filming in Long Beach|publisher=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jWR_CQAAQBAJ&dq=The+Incredibly+Strange+Creatures+Who+Stopped+Living+and+Became+Mixed-Up+Zombies!!%3F+2004+50+Worst+Movies+Ever+Made%27&pg=PT65|year=2012|isbn=978-1614237754|access-date=March 27, 2023|archive-date=April 7, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407010802/https://books.google.com/books?id=jWR_CQAAQBAJ&dq=The+Incredibly+Strange+Creatures+Who+Stopped+Living+and+Became+Mixed-Up+Zombies%21%21%3F+2004+50+Worst+Movies+Ever+Made%27&pg=PT65|url-status=live}}</ref> '']'' and ''Flavorwire'' included it on their respective worst film lists.<ref name="timeoutlist">{{cite web |last1=Singer |first1=Matthew |last2=McGeady |first2=Sean |title=The 40 best bad movies ever made |url=https://www.timeout.com/film/the-best-bad-movies-ever-made |website=] |date=September 7, 2022 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |archive-date=May 23, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230523020505/https://www.timeout.com/film/the-best-bad-movies-ever-made |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Flavorwire"/> | |||
] | |||
Based on the first half of ]'s novel of the same name and starring ], ], and ]. It was criticized for its poor script, hammy acting by Travolta, overuse of ]s, laughable dialogue, and several plot inconsistencies. The movie's distributor, ], was later forced out of business after it emerged that it had overstated the film's budget by $31 million. The film has a 2% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=battlefield_earth|title=Battlefield Earth}}</ref> and was included in their Top 100 worst reviewed movies of the last 10 years.<ref name="rottenworst">{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ |title=The worst of the worst pictures |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |date=2009-09-21 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> ] predicted that the film "for decades to come will be the punch line of jokes about bad movies."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20000512/REVIEWS/5120301/1023 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |title=Battlefield Earth}}</ref> It is also on his "most hated" list.<ref name="eberthated">{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050811/COMMENTARY/50808002/ |title=Ebert's Most Hated |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> It won seven ]s, including Worst Picture and Worst Screen Couple (John Travolta and "anyone on the screen with him").<ref>{{cite web|url=http://razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=44/ |title=It's official – "Battlefield Earth" ties with "Showgirls" |publisher=Razzies.com |date=2000-02-03 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> In 2005, an eighth Razzie (for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years) was awarded to the film,<ref>{{cite web |title=Awards for Battlefield Earth |work=Internet Movie Database |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0185183/awards |accessdate=2008-06-27}}</ref> and in 2010 the film won a ninth Razzie at the ] for "Worst Picture of the Decade",<ref name="30thRazzies">{{cite web |title=Razzie Noms for Worst Picture of the Decade |work=Razzies.com |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/09NomPOD.asp |accessdate=2010-02-02}}</ref> the most of any film in the history of the awards.<ref>http://www.razzies.com/history/07release.asp</ref> The movie appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic">{{cite web |title=Metacritic's Worst Reviewed Movies |work=Metacritic.com |url=http://www.metacritic.com/film/lowscores.shtml |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list,<ref name="MRQE50">{{cite web |title=50 Worst Movies |work=] |url=http://www.mrqe.com/movies/special/50_worst_movies |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> and remains on the IMDb bottom 100.<ref name="IMDB100"/> It is #1 on both the Bottom 200 movie list at Everyone's a Critic,<ref name="Everyone"/> and the 100 worst movies list at DigitalDreamDoor.com.<ref name="Digital100"/> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Monster a Go-Go!'' (1965) === | ||
{{Main|Monster a Go-Go!{{!}}''Monster a Go-Go!''}} | |||
] ''(pictured)'' accepted his Razzie Awards in person, which included Worst Picture, Actor, Director and Screenplay.]] | |||
''Monster a Go-Go!'' began as ''Terror at Halfday'' by ]. The production ran out of money and the film was abandoned. ], who reportedly needed a second feature to compose a double bill, purchased and completed it for a minimal amount of money. Several of the film's actors were unable to return, so Lewis simply replaced their parts with new characters who mysteriously appear and fill the roles of the missing characters. One of the actors Lewis managed to rehire had gained weight, gone bald, and grown a goatee, so Lewis recast him as the brother of the original character.<ref name="agony">{{cite web |date=June 16, 2003 |url=http://www.agonybooth.com/monster_a_go_go/default.asp?Page=5 |title=Recap: Monster A-Go Go (1965) |work=The Agony Booth |access-date=January 21, 2007 |archive-date=October 23, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061023063604/http://www.agonybooth.com/monster_a_go_go/default.asp?Page=5 |url-status=live }}</ref> The picture consists mostly of lengthy dialogue sequences concerning the apparent mutation of an astronaut into a monster portrayed by the 231-cm-tall (7 ft 6¾ in) ]. Poor audio quality makes much of the dialogue unintelligible, and when the film is overexposed, several characters' faces appear as bright white, glowing circles. During the climax of the movie, as soldiers prepare to confront the mutated astronaut, he abruptly vanishes and the narrator informs the audience, "there was no monster", and that the astronaut has, in fact, been in the ] the entire time.<ref>{{cite web |last=Beldin |first=Fred |title=Monster A Go-Go! |work=Allmovie.com |url=https://allmovie.com/movie/monster-a-go-go%21-v33169/review |access-date=September 12, 2012 |archive-date=August 2, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120802155607/http://www.allmovie.com/movie/monster-a-go-go%21-v33169/review |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A comedy film starring ], who also wrote and directed it, featuring largely ] and ] (including multiple instances of ]) similar to that featured in '']''. In the film, Green stars as a 28-year-old slacker and cartoonist who falsely accuses his father of ] when he questions his son's life goals. ''Freddy Got Fingered'' received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with ] critic Paul Clinton declaring it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history".<ref>{{cite news |last=Clinton |first=Paul |title='Freddy Got Fingered' is a bad, bad film |publisher=CNN |date=April 19, 2011 |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/19/Freddy.Fingered/ |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref> A review in '']'' said: "If ever a movie testified to the utter creative bankruptcy of the Hollywood film industry, it is the abomination known as Freddy Got Fingered."<ref>{{cite news |last=Hughes |first=Scott |title=The worst movie ever? |work=] |date=April 26, 2001 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref> Film reviewer ] included the film on his "most hated" list,<ref name="eberthated" /> gave it zero out of four stars, and wrote: "This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. ... This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |title=Freddy Got Fingered |work=] |date=April 20, 2011 |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010420/REVIEWS/104200304/1023 |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref> ''Freddy Got Fingered'' was nominated for eight awards at the ], and won for Worst Picture, Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, and Worst On-Screen Couple.<ref name="BBC0211">{{cite news |title=Freddy heads Razzies nominations |publisher=BBC News |date=February 11, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1814018.stm |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref><ref name="BBC0323">{{cite news |last=Waters |first=Darren |title=Green gets fingered for Razzies |publisher=BBC News |date=March 23, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/entertainment/2002/oscars_2002/1889555.stm |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref> Razzies founder ] called the film "offensive, stupid and obnoxious" and said it had "no redeeming value".<ref name="BBC0211"/> Tom Green accepted his awards in person, traveling to the ceremony in a white ], wearing a tuxedo and rolling out his own ] to the presentation. In 2010, the film was nominated at the ] for "Worst Picture of the Decade",<ref name="30thRazzies"/> although it lost to ''Battlefield Earth''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Masters |first=Tim |title=Sandra Bullock wins worst actress award at Razzies |publisher=BBC News |date=March 7, 2010 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8554035.stm |accessdate=February 9, 2011}}</ref> ''Freddy Got Fingered'' also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.<ref name="Metacritic"/> | |||
'']'' notes that many ]s consider it to be the worst film of all time, including the film's original director Rebane.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Voger |first1=Mark |title='Monster A-Go Go': A cult favorite guaranteed to make you cringe |url=https://www.nj.com/entertainment/2010/10/monster_a-go_go_a_cult_favorit.html |website=] |access-date=December 7, 2024 |language=en |date=October 26, 2010}}</ref> Matt Brunson of ''Film Frenzy'' agrees with its designation as one of the worst films ever made, stating it belongs in the "exalted pantheon of immortal atrocities like ''Plan 9 from Outer Space'', ''Robot Monster'' and '']''."<ref>{{cite web |title=Monster A-Go-Go - Movie Reviews {{!}} Rotten Tomatoes |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/monster_a_gogo/reviews |website=] |access-date=December 7, 2024 |language=en}}</ref> Meanwhile, '']'' writer B. Alan Orange believes it to be the second-worst movie ever made, after '']''.<ref name="movieweborange">{{cite web |last1=Orange |first1=B. Alan |title=Bill Rebane Looks Back at Monster a Go-Go! |url=https://movieweb.com/exclusive-bill-rebane-looks-back-at-monster-a-go-go/ |website=] |access-date=December 2, 2024 |language=en |date=October 25, 2010}}</ref> It was also featured on ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'', where writer ] called the dialogue "garbled beyond recognition" and declared it to be the worst movie they ever featured on the program.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go |publisher=Castle Forrester |url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0421.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120215055/http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0421.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 20, 2008 |access-date=March 7, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.angelfire.com/ga/hikeeba/mst3kguide.html |title=Hi-keeba!'s MST3K Episode Guide |work=Angelfire.com |date=March 1, 2001 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=August 20, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820170410/http://www.angelfire.com/ga/hikeeba/mst3kguide.html |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Total Film'' later included it on its list of the worst films ever made.<ref name=TotalFilm/> | |||
==='']'' (2003)=== | |||
A 1960s style ] ] starring ] and ] (the winner and runner-up, respectively, from the ] of '']''). The movie was a ], grossing only $5 million. It is on IMDb's Bottom 100 list,<ref name="IMDB100"/> and has an 8% rating at Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=from_justin_to_kelly|title=From Justin to Kelly}}</ref> '']'' film critic ] wrote in his review, "How bad is ''From Justin to Kelly?'' Set in Miami during spring break, it's like ''Grease: The Next Generation'' acted out by the food-court staff at SeaWorld."<ref name="ew">{{cite web|url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,452286~1~0~fromjustintokelly,00.html|title=Movie Review From Justin to Kelly (2003)|date=May 23, 2003|accessdate=July 21, 2009|publisher='']|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen}}</ref> Some theater chains threatened not to screen the movie at all when distributor ] announced plans to rush it to ] and ] a mere six weeks after its opening weekend, but Fox ultimately relented and pushed the release date back a number of months. After the opening-weekend flop, Fox reinstated the original release schedule. The ] was considered so bad that a special "Governor's Award" was created as an excuse to present the film with a Razzie. In addition, it won the ] in 2005 for "Worst 'Musical' of Our First 25 Years." The film is in the Top 10 of the Bottom 200 movie list at Everyone's a Critic,<ref name="Everyone"/> appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> | |||
==='' |
=== ''Manos: The Hands of Fate'' (1966) === | ||
{{Main|Manos: The Hands of Fate{{!}}''Manos: The Hands of Fate''}} | |||
This independently produced film about an amiable banker whose friends betray him one by one has been called "the '']'' of bad movies" by some critics.<ref name="ew1">{{cite news |url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20246031,00.html |title=The Crazy Cult of 'The Room': A five-year-old box office flop has turned into the newest midnight movie sensation |date=2009-07-20 |publisher='']'' |accessdate=7 March 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/the-couch-surfer-it-may-be-sublimely-rubbish-but-the-room-makes-audiences-happy-1752708.html |title=The Couch Surfer: 'It may be sublimely rubbish, but The Room makes audiences happy' |date=2009-07-20 |publisher=Independent.co.uk |accessdate=23 November 2009 |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/12/30/the-room-postsc/ |title='The Room': Worst movie ever? Don't tell that to its suddenly in-demand star. |last=Collis |first=Clark |date=2008-12-30 |publisher=Popwatch.ew.com |accessdate=23 November 2009}}</ref> Although the film's star, writer, producer and director ] has claimed it to be a ] (and that, as a result, the film's numerous flaws are intentional), other actors involved in the production have denied this, stating that Wiseau intended it to be a ]tic romance.<ref name="Times1">{{cite news |title=Cult hit (Even M is a recycled sex scene) The Room is best worst film |url=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6067024.ece |publisher= The Times |first=Christopher |last=Goodwin |date=April 12, 2009 |location=London}}</ref> Its bizarre lines, protracted sex scenes, nonsensical exterior shots (one scene features three establishing shots during its duration), and infamous use of ] for "outdoor" rooftop scenes, were considered so laughable that it has gained a cult status, and regularly sells out midnight viewings at theaters in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia. It made its broadcast premiere as an ] special in 2009 on ]'s ] block, edited down from its original R rating to a TV-14/DSLV rating. The day after its appearance, its DVD became the top-selling ] on ]. It has garnered a cult following similar to '']'',<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|room|The Room}}</ref> and in June 2010, ''The Room'' started playing at the ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Siblo |first=Matt |url=http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39009/tommy-wiseau-and-the-room-at-afi-silver-theatre-friday |title=Tommy Wiseau and The Room at AFI Silver Theatre: Friday, June 11 through Sunday, June 13 |publisher=Washington City Paper |date=2010-06-12 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> '']'' alumni ], ], and ] produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through their site ].com. | |||
]'' (1966) went unnoticed until the cult TV series '']'' aired the film in 1993.]] | |||
The low-budget horror film ''Manos: The Hands of Fate'', made by ] insurance and fertilizer salesman Hal P. Warren,<ref>{{cite book |title=The Joy of Trash: Nathan Rabin's Happy Place's Definitive Guide to the Very Wortst of Everything |date=December 16, 2021 |page=154 |publisher=Independently published |isbn=979-8-7859-1421-6 |url=https://www.amazon.com/Joy-Trash-Nathan-Definitive-Everything/dp/B09NR9NTB4 |access-date=December 29, 2021 |archive-date=December 29, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229034841/https://www.amazon.com/Joy-Trash-Nathan-Definitive-Everything/dp/B09NR9NTB4 |url-status=live }}</ref> concerns a vacationing family kidnapped by a ] of ]. The film was conceived after Warren bet Academy Award-winning screenwriter ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-69-manos-the-hands-of-fate-1966|title=Exploiting our Archives: Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #69 Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)|website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place|date=May 13, 2023|access-date=December 29, 2021|archive-date=December 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229033553/https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/9/16/control-nathan-rabin-40-69-manos-the-hands-of-fate-1966|url-status=live}}</ref> that anyone could make a horror movie.<ref name="EW2">{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2005/06/06/worst-movie-ever-made/ |title=The Worst Movie Ever Made |page=2 |magazine=] |date=June 6, 2005 |access-date=December 3, 2019 |first=Dalton |last=Ross |archive-date=January 4, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220104025540/https://ew.com/article/2005/06/06/worst-movie-ever-made/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Warren was convinced by the film's cinematographer and stunt coordinator that most of its glaring mistakes could be fixed in a ] post-production studio, when in reality the two wanted to quickly wrap the production because they were not being paid.<ref name="EW2"/> Several technical gaffes made it into the film, including scenes filmed out of focus, a marking slate being seen in one shot, the scarf on the female lead's head disappearing and reappearing, and an insect bumping the camera lens.<ref name="EW2"/>{{sfn|Adams|pages=91–2}} The film was shot with a camera that could not record sound and had a 32-second maximum shot length. All dialogue was later dubbed by Warren and four others, including a grown woman who dubbed the voice for a seven-year-old girl.{{sfn|Adams|pages=91–2}}<ref name="NBC">{{cite web |url=http://entertainment.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/13/12645253-torgo-lives-mystery-science-alums-revisit-worst-movie-ever-manos-the-hands-of-fate |title=Torgo lives! 'Mystery Science' alums revisit worst movie ever, 'Manos: The Hands of Fate' |last=Fashingbauer Cooper |first=Gael |date=August 13, 2012 |work=] |access-date=March 4, 2013 |archive-date=January 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130103195520/http://entertainment.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/13/12645253-torgo-lives-mystery-science-alums-revisit-worst-movie-ever-manos-the-hands-of-fate |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
''Manos'' opens with nine minutes of monotonous driving scenes reportedly intended to be overlaid with ] that were never added.<ref name="NBC"/> The movie includes dialogue spoken while all characters are facing away from the camera, a character complaining about it getting dark while the sun is brightly shining, and the character Torgo, a ] with overly large thighs, that three women attempt to massage to death.<ref name="EW2"/><ref name="NBC"/><ref name="ElPaso">{{cite news |title=Hero Massaged to Death in 'Manos-- The Hands of Fate' |first=Betty |last=Pierce |url=http://www.mst3ktemple.com/images/manos_review-post-x.jpg |newspaper=] |date=November 11, 1966 |access-date=March 1, 2013 |archive-date=December 17, 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051217154836/http://www.mst3ktemple.com/images/manos_review-post-x.jpg |url-status=usurped }}</ref> The film gained notoriety and cult popularity by being featured on '']'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Manos: The Hands of Fate |work=TV.com |url=http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/manos-the-hands-of-fate/episode/46947/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;74/ |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628235129/http://www.tv.com/mystery-science-theater-3000/manos-the-hands-of-fate/episode/46947/summary.html?tag=ep_list%3Btitle%3B74%2F |url-status=dead }}</ref> and was the show's most popular episode.<ref name="EW2"/> The film has a rare 0% approval rating on ],<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q691828|title=Manos – the Hands of Fate |access-date=July 2, 2018}}</ref> and '']'' says the movie is "widely regarded as, quite simply, the worst movie ever made".<ref name="EW2"/> Even Warren himself would later admit his film was one of the worst ever, suggesting it might make a passable comedy if redubbed.<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Brandt |url=http://www.jophan.org/mimosa/m18/brandt.htm |title=The Hand That Time Forgot |work=Mimosa |date=May 1996 |access-date=August 17, 2006 |pages=35–38 |archive-date=October 6, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006083628/http://www.jophan.org/mimosa/m18/brandt.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> The film was later restored<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2011/12/12/143573040/manos-the-hands-of-fate-carefully-restoring-the-opposite-of-a-masterpiece|title='Manos: The Hands Of Fate': Carefully Restoring The Opposite Of A Masterpiece|first=Chris|last=Heller|date=December 12, 2011|website=NPR|access-date=March 16, 2020|archive-date=May 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200529014421/https://www.npr.org/2011/12/12/143573040/manos-the-hands-of-fate-carefully-restoring-the-opposite-of-a-masterpiece|url-status=live}}</ref> and released on Blu-ray in 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/read-this-the-battle-over-the-infamous-cult-classic-ma-1798284742|title=Read this: The battle over the infamous cult classic Manos: The Hands of Fate|date=September 25, 2015|website=The A.V. Club|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=August 15, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220815104028/https://www.avclub.com/read-this-the-battle-over-the-infamous-cult-classic-ma-1798284742|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.synapsefilms.com/product/manos-the-hands-of-fate-special-edition-blu-ray/|title=Manos: The Hands of Fate – Synapse Films|date=October 13, 2015|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=July 13, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713142423/https://www.synapsefilms.com/product/manos-the-hands-of-fate-special-edition-blu-ray/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==='']'' (2003)=== | |||
A ] movie featuring ] and ], with appearances by ] and ]. ''Gigli'' was originally a ] with no romantic subplot. The producers demanded script rewrites throughout filming, hoping to cash in on the ] that was big news in celebrity-watching publications of the time such as '']'' and '']''. This film cost $54 million to make but grossed only $6 million, making it one of the biggest box office bombs of all time. It was also the winner of seven ] (including 2005's Worst "Comedy" of Our First 25 Years),<ref name="twenty-five"/> and in 2010 the film was nominated at the ] for "Worst Picture of the Decade".<ref name="30thRazzies"/> The movie remains on the IMDb bottom 100,<ref name="IMDB100"/> is in the Top 10 on the Bottom 200 movie list at Everyone's a Critic,<ref name="Everyone"/> and was included in Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 worst reviewed movies of the last 10 years,<ref name="rottenworst"/> where it has a 6% rating.<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=gigli|title=Gigli}}</ref> | |||
==='' |
=== ''A Place for Lovers'' (1968) === | ||
{{Main|A Place for Lovers{{!}}''A Place for Lovers''}} | |||
Nominally based on ] and starring ], the titular ''Catwoman'' bears little resemblance to the ] antagonist: The cinematic Catwoman has ], unlike in the comics, and leaps from rooftop to rooftop in stiletto heels. The character's signature ] ] was replaced with slashed leather trousers and matching ], and a mask that also acts as a hat. As the movie character differs so widely from her comic book source, the character, as portrayed in this film, has been cited as "Catwoman In Name Only".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.catwomanfan.com/en/film/2004/index.php |title=Catwoman (2004) |accessdate=2009-05-22}}</ref> The film was the result of various rewrites by a total of 28 different screenwriters, though only four were credited after arbitration with the WGA. It has a 10% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=catwoman|title=Catwoman}}</ref> and was declared "arguably the worst superhero film ever made" by the '']''. Jean Lowerison of the '']'' said in her review that Catwoman "Goes on my 'worst' list for the year, and quite possibly for all time."<ref>{{cite web |author=Jean Lowerison |url=http://sandiegometro.archives.whsites.net/reel/index.php?reelID=713 |title='Catwoman' The cat and the Bratt |publisher=San Diego Metropolitan |date= |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> '']'' summed up reviews of the film under the title "Me-Ouch."<ref>{{cite web |author=Janet Kim |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-07-20/film/me-ouch/1 |title=Me-Ouch – Page 1 – Movies – New York |publisher=Village Voice |date=2004-07-20 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> The movie was the winner of four ] for Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Director (]), and Worst Screenplay.<ref name="twenty-five">{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm |title=Halle’s Feline Fiasco CATWOMAN and President’s FAHRENHEIT Blunders Tie for 25th RAZZIE® Dis-Honors |publisher=Razzies.com |date= |accessdate=2011-03-07}}</ref> Berry arrived at the ceremony to accept her Razzie in person (with her Best Actress ] for '']'' in hand), saying: "First of all, I want to thank Warner Brothers. Thank you for putting me in a piece of shit, god-awful movie . . . It was just what my career needed." It is in the Top 10 of the Bottom 200 movie list at Everyone's a Critic,<ref name="Everyone"/> and is on Roger Ebert's "most hated" list.<ref name="eberthated"/> | |||
''A Place for Lovers'' is a French-Italian ] directed by ] (a filmmaker known for acclaimed ] works, such as '']'' and '']''), starring ] as a terminally ill American fashion designer in ], and ] as a race car driver who has a whirlwind affair with her. ] of the '']'' called it the "most godawful piece of pseudo-romantic slop I've ever seen!"<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=A Place for Lovers |newspaper=] |date=December 16, 1969 |url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/a-place-for-lovers-1969 |access-date=October 19, 2013 |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020094319/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-place-for-lovers-1969 |url-status=live }}</ref> and ] of the '']'' referred to it as "the worst movie I have seen all year and possibly since 1926".<ref>{{cite news |title=A Place For Lovers Film 'Worst' One Critic's Seen |last=Champlin |first=Charles |author-link=Charles Champlin |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FmlkAAAAIBAJ&pg=1127,904508&dq=a+place+for+lovers+dunaway+worst |newspaper=] |date=December 18, 1969 |access-date=August 19, 2013 |archive-date=July 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220709123728/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FmlkAAAAIBAJ&pg=1127%2C904508&dq=a+place+for+lovers+dunaway+worst |url-status=live }}</ref> Leonard Maltin noted Ebert's comments in his review, and offered that the film was "low points for all concerned".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> ''A Place for Lovers'' was included as one of the choices in ''The Fifty Worst Films of All Time,'' and '']'' listed it as one of the 20 worst movies ever made.<ref name="italianvanity"/> | |||
==='' |
=== ''They Saved Hitler's Brain'' (1968) === | ||
{{Main|They Saved Hitler's Brain{{!}}''They Saved Hitler's Brain''}} | |||
Loosely based on a ] by ] and directed by ], this film was panned by critics from '']'', '']'', '']'' and various Internet movie sites for a multitude of reasons, including poor script and production values, overuse of slow-motion and quick cuts to optimize the gory content, almost no connection to the game, and bad acting. One review said the movie was "so poorly built, so horribly acted and so sloppily stitched together that it's not even at the straight-to-DVD level."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.eonline.com/Reviews/Facts/Movies/Reviews/0,1052,88718,00.html | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20061007152251/http://www.eonline.com/Reviews/Facts/Movies/Reviews/0,1052,88718,00.html | archivedate = 2006-10-07 | publisher = E! Online | title = Movie Reviews: Alone in the Dark (2005)}}</ref> The movie has received a 1% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{rotten-tomatoes|id=alone_in_the_dark|title=Alone in the Dark}}</ref> and was included in their Top 100 worst reviewed movies of the last 10 years.<ref name="rottenworst"/> Critic Rob Vaux states that this movie is so bad that "the other practitioners of cinematic drivel can rest a little easier now; they can walk in the daylight with their heads held high, a smile on their lips and a song in their hearts. It's okay, they'll tell themselves. I didn't make ''Alone in the Dark''."<ref> at Flipside Movies</ref> Screenwriter Blair Erickson wrote about his experience dealing with Boll and his original script, which was closer to the actual game itself, and Boll's script change demands on the comedy website '']''.<ref>{{cite news | title = Behind the Scenes: Uwe Boll and Uwe Boll's Alone In the Dark | url = http://www.somethingawful.com/index.php?a=2649 | first = Blair | last = Erickson | date = 2005-02-02 | publisher = Something Awful}}</ref> The movie remains on the IMDb bottom 100,<ref name="IMDB100"/> is in the Top 10 on the Bottom 200 movie list at ],<ref name="Everyone"/> appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> It also received two ] nominations for Worst Director (Uwe Boll) and Worst Actress (]), and won three 2005 ], for Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Special Effects.<ref name="2005stinkers">{{cite web|last=Weinberg |first=Scott |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1646425/2005_stinker_awards_announced |title=2005 Stinker Awards Announced! |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |date=2006-03-03 |accessdate=2011-01-17}}</ref> In 2009, Peter Hartlaub, the ]'s pop culture critic, named it the worst film of the decade.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/01/MV9A1BAHMM.DTL&type=movies | work=The San Francisco Chronicle | title=Decade in review: Hartlaub's movie choices | date=2010-07-30}}</ref> | |||
''They Saved Hitler's Brain'' is a ] directed by ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92846/They-Saved-Hitler-s-Brain/ |title=They Saved Hitler's Brain (1964) |publisher=TCM.com |access-date=March 27, 2020 |archive-date=March 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327112754/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92846/They-Saved-Hitler-s-Brain/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was ] from a shorter 1963 theatrical ], ''Madmen of Mandoras'', and was lengthened by about 20 minutes with additional footage shot by ] students at the request of the distributor. In the film, ]'s head was severed from his body at the end of ] and the head plans to rule over a ] from ]. It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on five reviews from critics, with an average rating of 1.3/10.<ref name="hitlersbrain">{{cite web |url = http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/they_saved_hitlers_brain/ |title = They Saved Hitler's Brain | work = ] |publisher = ] |access-date = March 26, 2020 |archive-date = October 21, 2019 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20191021085728/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/they_saved_hitlers_brain/ |url-status = live }}</ref> '']'' called it "One of the all-time worst",<ref name="hitlersbrain"/> while Danny Peary said it was "A legitimate candidate for Worst Film Ever Made title."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Peary|first=Danny|author-link=Danny Peary|title=Guide for the Film Fanatic|publisher=]|page=430|year=1986|isbn=0671610813}}</ref> In 1979, it won the World's Worst Film Festival in ], which reportedly delighted Bradley.<ref name="aslide">{{Cite book|last=Slide|first=Anthony|author-link=Anthony Slide|title=Magnificent Obsession: The Outrageous History of Film Buffs, Collectors, Scholars, and Fanatics|publisher=]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ep9GDwAAQBAJ&q=they+saved+hitler%27s+brain+&pg=PT105|year=2018|isbn=978-1496810533|access-date=October 2, 2020|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172940/https://books.google.com/books?id=ep9GDwAAQBAJ&q=they+saved+hitler%27s+brain+&pg=PT105#v=snippet&q=they%20saved%20hitler's%20brain&f=false|url-status=live}}</ref> It has been featured in ''The Golden Turkey Awards'' and ''Canned Film Festival'',<ref name="cannedfilm"/> and has been spoofed on '']'' multiple times.<ref name="aslide"/> | |||
== 1970s == | |||
==='']'' (2008)=== | |||
An independently produced film that is an apparent homage to ]'s ], ''Birdemic'' tells the story of a romance between the two leading characters, played by ] and Whitney Moore, as their small town is attacked by birds. Written, directed, and produced by James Nguyen, the film was intended to be a "romantic thriller"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2010/02/12/james-nguyens-birdemic-is-the-new-best-worst-movie-ever/ |title=BIRDEMIC HAS ROMANCE AND SUSPENSE AND ALL THAT |publisher=Viceland Today |date=2010-02-12 |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref> but gained a cult following due to its poor quality, with reviewers calling out its wooden acting, bad dialogue, amateurish sound and editing, nonsensical plot and, in particular, its special effects, consisting primarily of poorly rendered CGI eagles and vultures that perform physically awkward aerial maneuvers and explode upon impact with the ground. The film, which cost $10,000 to make,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8604858.stm |title=Is Birdemic worst film ever made? |publisher=BBC News |date=2010-04-06 |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref> was called by the '']'' "truly, one of the worst films ever made"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fabio-periera/review-embirdemic-shock-a_b_491140.html |author=Fabio Periera |title=Review: Birdemic: Shock and Terror |publisher=Huffington Post |date=2010-03-09 |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref> and by '']'' as "one more in the pantheon of beloved trash-terpieces".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-03-30/film/birdemic-shock-and-terror-one-more-for-the-trash-terpiece-heap/ |title=Birdemic: Shock and Terror, One More for the Trash-terpiece Heap |publisher=The Village Voice |date=2010-03-30 |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref> '']'' deemed it among the worst movies ever made,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2249870/pagenum/all/#p2 |title=The Worst Movies Ever Made |publisher=Slate |date=2010-04-06 |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref> while '']'' referred to it as "a cult hit among bad-movie fans"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/02/25/birdemic_review |title="Birdemic": The magic of atrocious CGI, confirmed |publisher=Salon |date=2011-02-25 |accessdate=2011-05-06}}</ref> and '']'' stated that the film displayed "all the revered hallmarks of hilariously bad filmmaking."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117942491?refcatid=31 |title=Variety Reviews - Birdemic: Shock and Terror |publisher=Variety |date=2010-03-29 |accessdate=2011-05-06}}</ref> Following the home media release of ''Birdemic'', ], ], and ] of '']'' fame produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through ]. | |||
=== ''Myra Breckinridge'' (1970) === | |||
'''spy kids all the time in the world''' | |||
{{Main|Myra Breckinridge (film){{!}}''Myra Breckinridge'' (film)}} | |||
]'' and '']'' were based on works by author and political commentator ], who disowned both adaptations.]] | |||
The 1970 comedy film ''Myra Breckinridge'', based on the ] by ], directed by ] and starring ], ], ], ] and ],<ref>{{cite web |title=Myra Breckinridge |url=https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/myra-breckinridge-1117793381/ |magazine=] |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=January 1, 1970 |archive-date=September 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210924071014/https://variety.com/1969/film/reviews/myra-breckinridge-1117793381/ |url-status=live }}</ref> provoked controversy due to a scene in which Welch forcibly sodomizes a bound man while clips from various classic films play onscreen. The film was initially ] before edits and an appeal to the ] brought it down to an R. It also used ] from ] movies in such a way that the dialogue took on sexual undertones. The film was a critical failure, with '']'' magazine saying, "''Myra Breckinridge'' is about as funny as a child molester."<ref>{{cite news |title=Cinema:Some Sort of Nadir |magazine=] |date=July 6, 1970 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878382,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513095014/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,878382,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 13, 2008 |access-date=March 7, 2011}}</ref> Leonard Maltin gave it a BOMB (the lowest score possible) and stated that it was "as bad as any movie ever made".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> '']'' critic Herb Kelly nominated ''Myra Breckinridge'' as the worst film ever made.<ref>{{cite news |title='Breckinridge' Worst Ever |last=Kelly |first=Herb |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/40395524/ |newspaper=] |date=August 29, 1970 |access-date=August 17, 2013 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172959/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-miami-news-herb-kelly-columnbrecke/40395524/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was also included in ''The Book of Lists''{{'}} worst movies of all time, which claimed that there was something in it to offend absolutely everyone.{{sfn|Book of Lists|page=208}} Likewise, ''The Fifty Worst Films of All Time'' and ''Vanity Fair'' also listed it as one of the worst movies ever made.<ref name="italianvanity"/> Gore Vidal disowned it, calling it "an awful joke",<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hoberman |first1=J. |author-link1=J. Hoberman |last2=Rosenbaum |first2=Jonathan |author-link2=Jonathan Rosenbaum |title=Midnight Movies |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=1991 |isbn=0-306-80433-6 |page=268}}</ref> and blamed the movie for a decade-long drought in the sale of the original book.<ref>{{cite book |last=Conner |first=Floyd |title=Hollywood's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Lucky Breaks, Prima Donnas, Box Office Bombs, and Other Oddities |publisher=Brassey's |year=2002 |isbn=1-57488-480-8 |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodsmostwa0000conn/page/65 }}</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
* ] | |||
=== ''Zaat'' (1971) === | |||
* ] | |||
{{Main|Zaat{{!}}''Zaat''}} | |||
* ] | |||
Directed by Don Barton,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/one-and-done-8-filmmakers-who-have-only-directed-a-single-movie/ar-AA108Iqg?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8a77fc93804d4808bab665cceffcb034 |title=One and Done: 8 Filmmakers Who Have Only Directed a Single Movie – Collider on msn.com |website=] |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730222838/https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/one-and-done-8-filmmakers-who-have-only-directed-a-single-movie/ar-AA108Iqg?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8a77fc93804d4808bab665cceffcb034 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Zaat'' was also known under various titles including ''Hydra'', ''Attack of the Swamp Creatures'', ''Legend of the Zaat Monster'', and ''The Blood Waters of Dr. Z'' (the name under which it was lampooned on ''Mystery Science Theater 3000''). The film follows a Nazi ] who injects himself with a formula that turns him into a mutated catfish. '']'' critic Matt Soergel quipped that ''Zaat'' "could very well be the best film ever made about a mutated catfish".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/061201/enm_zaat.html|title=Locally made sci-fi thriller is all 'Zaat' and then some|date=June 12, 2001|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=August 13, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170813183130/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/061201/enm_zaat.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Critic Jeffrey Kauffman said, "this is the sort of film Ed Wood, Jr. might have made—on a bad day" and added, "Lovers of fantastically bad films rate ''Zaat'' one of the worst".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Zaat-Blu-ray/35923/#Review|title=Zaat Blu Ray|date=February 21, 2012|last=Kauffman|first=Jeffrey|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=July 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180711203907/http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Zaat-Blu-ray/35923/#Review|url-status=live}}</ref> Patrick Naugle of ] stated, "The acting in ''Zaat'' is below subpar. Actors seem to be whispering their lines and trying hard not to fully comprehend that they're in one of the worst films ever made", while Michael Rubino of DVD Verdict also claimed, "''Zaat'' may be one of the worst films ever created".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://dvdverdict.com/printer/zaatbluray.php|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002180849/https://dvdverdict.com/printer/zaatbluray.php|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 2, 2013|title=DVD Verdict Review – Zaat (Blu Ray)|date=February 12, 2012|last=Naugle|first=Patrick|work=]|access-date=September 30, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/mst3kxvii.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100225160816/https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/mst3kxvii.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 25, 2010 |title=DVD Verdict Review – Mystery Science Theater 3000 |date=February 22, 2010 |last=Rubino |first=Michael |work=] |access-date=September 30, 2013 }}</ref> ] called it a "sci-fi fiasco" when it became "the winner — er, loser —" on IMDb's Bottom 100.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101056819|title=10 Reasons Why We Love Making Lists|date=February 24, 2009|last=Weeks|first=Linton|work=]|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=October 20, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020082139/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101056819|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Zaat'' appeared on ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'', which gave it significant exposure,<ref>{{cite web |author=Sampo |url=http://www.mst3kinfo.com/?p=5866 |title=Season 10 Episode Guide! |publisher=MST3Kinfo |date=May 20, 2010 |access-date=December 19, 2013 |archive-date=December 18, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131218085901/http://www.mst3kinfo.com/?p=5866 |url-status=live }}</ref> and was also featured on ]'s show ''Half in the Bag'' where the hosts called it one of their favorite "]" films.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-zaat/|title=Half in the Bag:Zaat!|date=April 30, 2012|work=]|access-date=September 30, 2013|archive-date=March 27, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327104101/http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-zaat/|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''Total Film'' included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.<ref name="TotalFilm"/> | |||
=== ''An American Hippie in Israel'' (1972) === | |||
{{Main|An American Hippie in Israel{{!}}''An American Hippie in Israel''}} | |||
The 1972 Israeli film ''An American Hippie in Israel'' is about an American ] traveling to ] after being involved with the ], befriending Israeli ]ren, and encountering "menacing" ] along the way. The film was presumed ], but after resurfacing 38 years after its production, it became a "midnight sensation" in ] and developed a cult following<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://vimeo.com/76605726|title=An American Hippie in {{Typo|Isreal}}|author=Cork International Film Festival|date=October 10, 2013|via=Vimeo|access-date=April 25, 2020|archive-date=February 2, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202035330/https://vimeo.com/76605726|url-status=live}}</ref> akin to '']''. It was then released internationally on home video by ]. Gil Shefler of '']'' described it as "perfectly awful", offering that it "probably is the worst Israeli movie ever made, and a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time".<ref>{{cite news |newspaper=] |url=http://forward.com/articles/134946/finding-new-life-as-a-cult-classic/ |date=January 26, 2011 |last=Shefler |first=Gil |access-date=August 14, 2013 |title=Finding New Life As a Cult Classic |archive-date=October 18, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151018024531/http://forward.com/articles/134946/finding-new-life-as-a-cult-classic/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Its description as "a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time" was echoed by Josh Olson in '']''.<ref>{{cite web |last=Olson |first=Josh |title=Trailers from Hell: Josh Olson on Little Known Comedy 'An American Hippie in Israel' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/2013/12/trailers-from-hell-josh-olson-on-little-known-comedy-an-american-hippie-in-israel-194709/ |website=] |access-date=July 13, 2022 |language=en |date=December 9, 2013 |archive-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713060658/https://www.indiewire.com/2013/12/trailers-from-hell-josh-olson-on-little-known-comedy-an-american-hippie-in-israel-194709/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Ben Hartman of '']'' stated the film was "surely one of the worst films ever made in Israel, or beyond".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.jpost.com/Arts-and-Culture/Entertainment/Horrendous-Israeli-70s-film-becomes-a-cult-favorite |date=January 9, 2011 |last=Harman |first=Ben |work=] |access-date=August 29, 2013 |title='Horrendous' Israeli '70s film becomes a cult favorite |archive-date=August 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180830142226/https://www.jpost.com//Arts-and-Culture/Entertainment/Horrendous-Israeli-70s-film-becomes-a-cult-favorite |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' said it claims the title of "worst Israeli film and most amusing".<ref>{{Cite web|language=he |url=http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=766710 |title=News article from Nana 10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808053515/http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=766710 |archive-date=August 8, 2017 |access-date=August 26, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Bat Pussy'' (circa 1973) === | |||
{{Main|Bat Pussy{{!}}''Bat Pussy''}} | |||
A loose spoof of the 1966 '']'' television series cited as one of the earliest examples of a ], the presumably-1970s ] ''Bat Pussy'' has been described as the worst pornographic film ever made due to "some incredibly unarousing sex and a general attitude of awfulness".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11395280/The-rise-of-parody-porn-the-Chaucer-of-our-times.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11395280/The-rise-of-parody-porn-the-Chaucer-of-our-times.html |archive-date=2022-01-11 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=The rise of parody porn, 'the Chaucer of our times' |newspaper=] |author=Merz, Theo |date=February 23, 2015}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="BP73io9">{{cite web |url=http://io9.gizmodo.com/5914178/the-bizarre-history-of-superhero-porn-nsfw |title=The Bizarre History of Superhero Porn |author=Anders, Charlie Jane |date=May 30, 2012 |publisher=] |access-date=March 21, 2016 |archive-date=March 27, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160327103621/http://io9.gizmodo.com/5914178/the-bizarre-history-of-superhero-porn-nsfw |url-status=live }}</ref> Possessing no credits or copyright information, there is no known record of ''Bat Pussy''{{'}}s existence prior to the mid-1990s, when it was discovered in the storeroom of an ] in ], and subsequently released on home video by ] distributor ]. ]{{'}}s ] proclaimed the film to be "the absolute nadir of pornography, period. Not just Batman-themed pornography. ALL pornography", deriding its "obese ]" cast as rendering the film "]-proof".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://io9.gizmodo.com/5545416/a-brief-history-of-batman-themed-pornography-nsfw |title=A brief history of Batman-themed pornography (NSFW) |publisher=] |author=Lamar, Cyriaque |date=May 22, 2010 |access-date=March 21, 2016 |archive-date=March 7, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307104420/http://io9.gizmodo.com/5545416/a-brief-history-of-batman-themed-pornography-nsfw |url-status=live }}</ref> ''PornParody.com'', a website dedicated to the genre, acknowledged its status as "the worst adult movie of all time", describing ''Bat Pussy'' as "renowned for its technical ineptness and anti-eroticism" due to its "physically unappealing" actors.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pornparody.com/2014/10/bat-pussy-the-first-superhero-porn-parody/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008174205/http://pornparody.com/2014/10/bat-pussy-the-first-superhero-porn-parody/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 8, 2014 |title=Bat Pussy – the first superhero porn parody? |date=October 6, 2014 |publisher=PornParody.com}}</ref> ''AV Maniacs'' contested ''Bat Pussy''{{'}}s categorization as pornography on the grounds of the lead actor's visible ] and instead labeled the film "anti-porn", asking "How else do you categorize an adult film that completely and utterly fails to elicit even the minutest amount of arousal in its viewers?"<ref name="BPAVClub">{{cite web |url=http://avmaniacs.com/features/bat_pussy.html |title=Deep Inside Bat Pussy |author=Allison, Matthew |publisher=AV Maniacs |access-date=March 24, 2016 |archive-date=October 26, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151026200719/http://avmaniacs.com/features/bat_pussy.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The book ''The Many More Lives of Batman'' by ] and ] also labeled ''Bat Pussy'' "the worst porn film ever made", criticizing its poor adaptation of the source material.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lj3-rQEACAAJ&q=%22Bat+Pussy%22&pg=PA115 |title=The Many More Lives of Batman |author1=Pearson, Rebecca |author2=Brooker, Will |author3=Uriccho, William |date=2015 |isbn=978-1844577644 |publisher=] |access-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240227175609/https://books.google.com/books?id=lj3-rQEACAAJ&q=%22Bat+Pussy%22&pg=PA115 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== ''At Long Last Love'' (theatrical version, 1975) === | |||
{{Main|At Long Last Love{{!}}''At Long Last Love''}} | |||
] initially apologized for '']'', once described as "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history", but an updated cut of the film has met with critical reevaluation.]] | |||
''At Long Last Love'' was renowned director ]'s musical homage to great 1930s Hollywood musicals. It features songs by ] and stars ] and ]. '']'' wrote that it received "the most withering reviews any film ever received", while '']'' reported that it was "savaged by critics at the time and viewed as one of the worst films ever".<ref>{{cite web |title=The Bootleg Files: At Long Last Love |url=https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-bootleg-files-at-long-last-love/ |work=] |access-date=July 19, 2022 |date=May 5, 2006 |archive-date=July 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719171530/https://filmthreat.com/uncategorized/the-bootleg-files-at-long-last-love/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Peter Bogdanovich: a life in pictures |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/gallery/2022/jan/06/peter-bogdanovich-a-life-in-pictures |website=] |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=January 6, 2022 |archive-date=July 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713143336/https://www.theguardian.com/film/gallery/2022/jan/06/peter-bogdanovich-a-life-in-pictures |url-status=live }}</ref> ] of '']'' compared it to the later critical failures of '']'' and '']'', writing: "critics of the time heaven's-gated , leaving Bogdanovich ishtarred and feathered".<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |title=How Peter Bogdanovich Shaped the Backstory of Modern Cinema |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/postscript/how-peter-bogdanovich-shaped-the-backstory-of-modern-cinema |magazine=] |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=January 7, 2022 |archive-date=May 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220530220647/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/postscript/how-peter-bogdanovich-shaped-the-backstory-of-modern-cinema |url-status=live }}</ref> Such reviews included ]'s, in which he said that "This failure is so dismal that it goes beyond failure",<ref>{{cite book |last=Tookey |first=Christopher |title =Named and Shamed: The World's Worst and Wittiest Movie Reviews from Affleck to Zeta-Jones |publisher =Troubador Publishing |year =2010 |page =34 |isbn =978-1-84876-560-3}}</ref> and '']'' critic ]'s, who said that "it may be the worst movie musical of this – or any – decade".<ref name=PictureShows>{{cite book |last=Yule |first=Andrew |title =Picture shows: the life and films of Peter Bogdanovich |publisher =] |year =1992 |page = |isbn =0-87910-153-9 |url =https://archive.org/details/pictureshowslife00yule/page/90 }}</ref> Meanwhile, '']'' film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time."<ref name="BufNews">{{cite news |title=Wisecrack Addicts Laughing at the Not-So-Bad |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BN&p_theme=bn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF994638769706&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |newspaper=] |date=May 24, 1996 |author=Simon, Jeff |access-date=October 11, 2011 |archive-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101095439/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BN&p_theme=bn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAF994638769706&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D |url-status=live }}</ref> Bogdanovich, who was also the screenwriter, sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for the film.<ref name=SinginANewTune/> | |||
] later noted that it had attained a legacy as being "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history",<ref name="longlastcnn">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/showbiz/movies/big-bombs-revisited|title=Picking up the pieces on Hollywood's biggest bombs|last=Leopold|first=Todd|date=July 11, 2013|access-date=August 23, 2013|publisher=]|archive-date=August 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818030235/http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/showbiz/movies/big-bombs-revisited|url-status=live}}</ref> and ] has said the film was "regarded as the great ] catastrophe of its time".<ref name=SinginANewTune>{{cite book |last=Muir |first=John Kenneth |title =Singing a new tune:the rebirth of the modern film musical, from Evita to De-lovely and beyond |publisher =] |year =2005 |page = |isbn =1-55783-610-8 |url =https://archive.org/details/singingnewtunere0000muir/page/58 }}</ref> Lester J. Keyser wrote that it was "justly included on most lists of the ten worst films ever made",<ref>{{cite book |last=Keyser |first=Lester J. |title=Hollywood in the Seventies |date=1981 |publisher=A.S. Barnes |location=Los Angeles, California |isbn=0498025454 |page=85}}</ref> as it was included in Michael Sauter's ''The Worst Films of All Time'', ''The Golden Turkey Awards'' and ''Vanity Fair'''s worst film list.{{sfn|Medved|1978|p=37}}<ref name=Goldenturkeys>{{cite book |last=Medved |first=Michael |title =The Golden Turkey Awards |publisher =] |year =1980 |page =209 |isbn =0-399-50463-X|title-link =The Golden Turkey Awards }}</ref><ref name="italianvanity"/> | |||
Bogdanovich lamented being influenced by studio previews to cut the film before its theatrical release. Unbeknownst to Bogdanovich, a studio editor who preferred the director's first cut constructed his own based on the test screening version that he once had access to. This version subsequently aired on cable TV and streamed on ] in place of the theatrical cut. When news of this reached Bogdanovich, he contacted Fox and made a few finishing touches, resulting in a better received director's cut that debuted on ] in 2013.<ref>{{cite web|last=McWeeny |first=Drew |url=http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/peter-bogdanovich-screens-new-cut-of-at-long-last-love-and-tells-story-behind-it |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120217194802/http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/peter-bogdanovich-screens-new-cut-of-at-long-last-love-and-tells-story-behind-it |title=Peter Bogdanovich screens new cut of At Long Last Love and tells story behind it |website=] |date=January 9, 2012 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=February 17, 2012}}</ref><ref name=longlastcnn/> | |||
=== ''Exorcist II: The Heretic'' (1977) === | |||
{{Main|Exorcist II: The Heretic{{!}}''Exorcist II: The Heretic''}} | |||
''Exorcist II: The Heretic'' is the sequel to ]'s ]-winning ], this time directed by ]. Friedkin opted not to return to direct the sequel and '']'' states that Boorman "hated the original" and intended ''The Heretic'' to be an "antidote to wash away the evil of Friedkin's film."<ref name="exorcist2">{{cite web |last=Fordy |first=Tom |title='The worst film ever made'? Why Exorcist II: The Heretic is truly the sequel from hell |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/exorcist-2-the-heretic-linda-blair-richard-burton/ |website=] |access-date=October 28, 2023 |date=October 3, 2023 |archive-date=October 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231028125349/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/exorcist-2-the-heretic-linda-blair-richard-burton/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Set four years after the first film, ] reprised her role as ], who is revealed to have healing powers, and ] stars as Father Philip Lamont, who believes that the demon ] targets those with healing abilities.<ref name="guardianworst"/> Blair agreed to return for the sequel as long as she did not have to wear the possession make-up from the first film, leading to the use of an unconvincing stand-in, while Burton read his lines off cue cards.<ref name="exorcist2"/> Despite ] dying in the original film, ] returned for flashback sequences set in Africa, where Lamont flies to on the back of a ].<ref name="exorcist2"/> | |||
''The Daily Telegraph'' notes that some consider it the worst film ever made.<ref name="exorcist2"/> British film critic ] called the original film his favorite film of all time but believes the sequel to be the worst film ever made, stating, "This is a film that trashes a work of art. It's like someone deciding to do a ''] 2'', but with a moustache."<ref name="guardianworst">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/02/1 |title='If I'd made that, I'd change my name' |access-date=December 1, 2013 |newspaper=] |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203135052/http://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/02/1 |url-status=live }}</ref> The ''Golden Turkey Awards'' named it the second-worst film ever made, after ''Plan 9 from Outer Space'', and it also appeared in ''The Official Razzie Movie Guide''. '']'' listed it as the worst sequel of all time and critic Bill Chambers stated it was "Possibly the worst film ever made and surely the worst sequel ever made."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/exorcist_ii_the_heretic/reviews/ |title=Exorcist II – The Heretic Reviews |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=April 16, 2019 |archive-date=April 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190428150130/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/exorcist_ii_the_heretic/reviews/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The 25 worst sequels of all time |url=https://www.avclub.com/the-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time-1850799210/slides/26 |website=The A.V. Club |access-date=October 28, 2023 |language=en |date=September 8, 2023 |archive-date=October 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231028125412/https://www.avclub.com/the-25-worst-sequels-of-all-time-1850799210/slides/26 |url-status=live}}</ref> Friedkin believed the sequel diminished the value of the original film and called it "the worst piece of shit I've ever seen" and "a fucking disgrace."<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2464836/original-exorcist-director-says-the-sequel-was-the-worst-movie-hes-ever-seen |title=Original Exorcist Director Says The Sequel Was The Worst Movie He's Ever Seen |publisher=] |date=January 9, 2019 |access-date=January 20, 2019 |last=Libbey |first=Dirk |archive-date=January 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121064119/https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2464836/original-exorcist-director-says-the-sequel-was-the-worst-movie-hes-ever-seen|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.blastr.com/2013-4-15/exorcist-director-says-sequel-one-worst-films-ive-ever-seen |title=Exorcist director says sequel is 'one of the worst films I've ever seen' |access-date=December 1, 2013 |date=April 15, 2013 |first=Don |last=Kaye |publisher=] |archive-date=August 4, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130804174243/http://www.blastr.com/2013-4-15/exorcist-director-says-sequel-one-worst-films-ive-ever-seen |url-status=dead}}</ref> Eventually, the film garnered so much hate that Boorman disowned it. In an interview with Bob McCabe for the book ''The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows'', he confessed, "The sin I committed was not giving the audience what it wanted in terms of horror."<ref>{{cite book |last=McCabe |first=Bob |title=The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows |publisher=] |date=1999 |page=164 |isbn=9780711975095}}</ref> A third installment in the ], '']'', was released in 1990 and would in later years gain a cult following,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3578046/masterpiece-exorcist-iii-nearly-turns-30-finally-getting-due/ |title=Nearly 30 Years Later, Masterpiece 'The Exorcist III' is Finally Getting Its Due |last=Kurland |first=Daniel |website=] |date=August 16, 2019}}</ref> with author Nat Segaloff writing that, "The first rule of ''Exorcist III'' is: you do not talk about ''Exorcist II''."<ref name="exorcist2"/> | |||
=== ''The Swarm'' (1978) === | |||
{{Main|The Swarm (1978 film){{!}}''The Swarm'' (1978 film)}} | |||
''The Swarm'' is a 1978 horror film about a ] invasion of ], directed and produced by ]. Despite its all-star cast (including ], ], ] and ]), it was a box-office failure and was excoriated by reviewers.<ref name="ts">''Halliwell's film and video guide 2002'' edited by John Walker. London. HarperCollins Entertainment, 2001. {{ISBN|0-00-712265-9}} (p. 804).</ref> On its UK release, '']'' described ''The Swarm'' as "simply the worst film ever made".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |title=The worst movie ever? |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111042603/http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |archive-date=November 11, 2013 |work=The Guardian |date=April 26, 2001 |access-date=March 29, 2014}}</ref> ] described it as a "very obvious disaster movie with risible dialogue".<ref name="ts"/> '']'' article on ''The Swarm'' stated, "You could pass it all off as a sick joke, except it cost twelve million dollars, twenty-two million bees, and several years of someone's life."<ref name="ts"/> ], reviewing it for '']'', stated, "the story is of a banality matched only by the woodenness of the acting".<ref name="ts"/> '']'' magazine called ''The Swarm'' a "risibly inadequate disaster movie".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-swarm |title=The Swarm |date=September 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115053443/https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-swarm |archive-date=November 15, 2019 |access-date=March 29, 2014}}</ref> ''The Swarm'' is included in several "worst movie" books, including the Medved brothers' ''The Golden Turkey Awards'',<ref>Mikel J. Koven, ''Film, Folklore and Urban Legends''. Scarecrow Press, 2008 {{ISBN|0-8108-6025-2}} (p. 91)</ref> and ''The Official Razzie Movie Guide''.<ref name="Wilson 2005">{{cite book|last=Wilson|first=John|title=The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst |year=2005|publisher=Grand Central Publishing|isbn=0-446-69334-0}}</ref> It soon gained a ] (enough so that ] released the extended version on ]).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/home-video/3517106/warner-archive-releasing-extended-version-1978s-swarm-blu-ray/|title=Warner Archive Releasing Extended Version of 1978's 'The Swarm' on Blu-ray|first=John|last=Squires|date=August 22, 2018|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 12, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112044300/https://bloody-disgusting.com/home-video/3517106/warner-archive-releasing-extended-version-1978s-swarm-blu-ray/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://addictedtohorrormovies.com/2017/07/14/on-this-day-in-horror-history-the-mind-boggling-the-swarm-hit-theaters/|title=On This Day in Horror History: The Mind Boggling 'The Swarm' Hit Theaters|date=July 14, 2017|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190111232542/https://addictedtohorrormovies.com/2017/07/14/on-this-day-in-horror-history-the-mind-boggling-the-swarm-hit-theaters/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== ''I Spit on Your Grave'' (1978) === | |||
{{Main|I Spit on Your Grave{{!}}''I Spit on Your Grave''}} | |||
''I Spit on Your Grave'' became controversial for its graphic violence and lengthy depictions of gang rape.<ref>{{cite web |last=Floorwalker |first=Mike |title=Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Takedowns Of All Time |url=https://www.grunge.com/125308/roger-eberts-most-brutal-movie-reviews-ever/ |website=] |access-date=January 17, 2022 |date=June 7, 2018 |archive-date=January 28, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128122409/https://www.grunge.com/125308/roger-eberts-most-brutal-movie-reviews-ever/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was initially unable to find a distributor until 1980 when it received a wider release. Luke Y. Thompson of the '']'' stated, "Defenders of the film have argued that it's actually pro-woman, due to the fact that the female lead wins in the end, which is sort of like saying that cockfights are pro-rooster because there's always one left standing".<ref name="Spiton">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_spit_on_your_grave|title=I Spit on Your Grave (Day of the Woman)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 14, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190414200846/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_spit_on_your_grave|url-status=live}}</ref> Critic David Keyes named ''I Spit on Your Grave'' the worst film of the 1980s and James Livingston wrote in ''The World Turned Inside Out'' that it was "a terrifically bad movie".<ref>{{cite book |url=http://hnn.us/articles/121079.html#:~:text=The%20excerpt%20that%20follows%20is%20drawn%20from%20Chapters,Intellectual%20History%20Conference%20at%20CUNY%20on%20November%2012th |first=James |last=Livingston |title=The World Turned Inside Out: American Thought and Culture at the End of the 20th Century |publisher=] |year=2011 |isbn=978-0742535428 |page=189 |access-date=August 10, 2020 |archive-date=September 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210924182041/http://hnn.us/articles/121079.html#:~:text=The%20excerpt%20that%20follows%20is%20drawn%20from%20Chapters,Intellectual%20History%20Conference%20at%20CUNY%20on%20November%2012th |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Spiton"/> Scott Tobias of ''The A.V. Club'' called it "one of the era's most abhorrent pieces of exploitation trash"<ref>{{cite news |url=https://avclub.com/article/emi-spit-on-your-graveem-2010-53367 |title=I Spit On Your Grave (2010) |first=Scott |last=Tobias |date=March 21, 2011 |newspaper=] |access-date=November 12, 2019 |archive-date=October 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025172917/https://www.avclub.com/i-spit-on-your-grave-2010-1798224700 |url-status=live }}</ref> and Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "It's one of the most soulless, vile, and morally reprehensible things I've ever had to sit through."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontmesssister.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040426083712/https://dvdverdict.com/reviews/dontmesssister.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 26, 2004 |title=Don't Mess With My Sister |first=Patrick |last=Naugle |date=February 15, 2002 |publisher=] }}</ref> Roger Ebert gave the film no stars, referring to it as "A vile bag of garbage ... without a shred of artistic distinction," adding, "Attending it was one of the most depressing experiences of my life"<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-1980 |title=Review of ''I Spit on Your Grave'' |access-date=October 11, 2020 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=July 16, 1980 |newspaper=] |archive-date=October 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211024112255/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-1980 |url-status=live }}</ref> and considered it the worst movie ever made.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/2247859-418/ebert-movie-chaz-roger-writer.html |title=Movie, journalism fans queue up to see Ebert |access-date=March 20, 2007 |first=Steve |last=Lord |date=November 7, 2010 |newspaper=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101111153312/http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/2247859-418/ebert-movie-chaz-roger-writer.html |archive-date=November 11, 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Video Q&A |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0U9IAAAAIBAJ&pg=2655,5621128&dq=roger+ebert+i+spit+on+your+grave+worst+ever |newspaper=] |date=May 28, 1998 |access-date=November 3, 2013 |archive-date=February 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213185938/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0U9IAAAAIBAJ&pg=2655%2C5621128&dq=roger+ebert+i+spit+on+your+grave+worst+ever |url-status=live }}</ref> ] also considered it one of the worst films ever made.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://chicagotribune.newspapers.com/clip/80954901/gene-siskel-movie-reviewsthe-man-who/ |title='Man Who Wasn't There' would best be left unseen |access-date=January 3, 2023 |first=Gene |last=Siskel |author-link=Gene Siskel |date=August 17, 1983 |newspaper=] |archive-date=January 3, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103203334/https://chicagotribune.newspapers.com/clip/80954901/gene-siskel-movie-reviewsthe-man-who/ |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Film Racket'' featured it as their first entry in to their "Worst Movie Ever?" series,<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://filmracket.com/worst-movie-ever-i-spit-on-your-grave/ |title=Worst Movie Ever? I Spit On Your Grave |first=Pete |last=Croatto |date=May 1, 2013 |work=Film Racket |access-date=July 31, 2015 |archive-date=September 11, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150911070207/http://filmracket.com/worst-movie-ever-i-spit-on-your-grave/ |url-status=usurped }}</ref> while ''Vanity Fair'' and ''Flavorwire'' included it in their worst film lists.<ref name="italianvanity"/><ref name="Flavorwire">{{cite web|url=http://flavorwire.com/477608/the-50-worst-movies-ever-made/view-all |title=The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330132846/https://www.flavorwire.com/477608/the-50-worst-movies-ever-made/view-all |first=Jason |last=Bailey |date= September 17, 2014 |archive-date=March 30, 2019 |work=]}}</ref> Despite the intense negative reception from some critics, the film has a 53% rating on Rotten Tomatoes,<ref name="Spiton"/> with '']'' critic R.L. Shaffer arguing that whether the film is repulsive and exploitative or ingenious depends on what the viewer wants from the movie: "Admittedly, ''I Spit on Your Grave'' is a gruesome, deplorable little exploitation picture that, on the surface, seems to enjoy its rape sequences just as much, if not more, than the vengeance-filled finale. But on a more subtle level, the film is a surprisingly well-executed revenge story that plays like a brutally raw nerve – a terrifyingly stark view of the real horror of rape, painted by bizarre, skewed cinematography, gory violence, and a keen sense of creeping atmosphere and dread."<ref>{{cite web |last=Shaffer |first=R. L. |title=I Spit on Your Grave (1978) Blu-Ray Review |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2011/02/04/i-spit-on-your-grave-1978-blu-ray-review |website=] |access-date=February 1, 2022 |date=February 4, 2011 |archive-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201230500/https://www.ign.com/articles/2011/02/04/i-spit-on-your-grave-1978-blu-ray-review |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== ''Caligula'' (theatrical version, 1979) === | |||
{{Main|Caligula (film){{!}}''Caligula'' (film)}} | |||
The 1979 erotic historical drama ''Caligula'', directed by ] about the infamous Roman Emperor ], was in part financed by '']'' founder ]. The film, featuring a prestigious cast (], ], ], and ]) is notorious for explicit scenes of sex and violence, including six minutes of hardcore porn footage filmed by Guccione and another editor without Brass' approval. ''Caligula'' earned some pre-release controversy after ], who had written the script, distanced himself from the film,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=6694|title=The Worst Movies of 1980 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org|access-date=April 14, 2021|archive-date=April 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414233852/https://siskelebert.org/?p=6694|url-status=live}}</ref> and actress ], who objected to the nude scenes, walked off the set and was replaced with then-unknown ].<ref name="timevidal">{{cite magazine |title=Show Business: Will the Real Caligula Stand Up? |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,947822-1,00.html |magazine=] |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=January 3, 1977 |archive-date=January 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118183135/http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,947822-1,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Upon its release, Vidal stated that it was "easily one of the worst films ever made".<ref name="timevidal"/> | |||
''Caligula'' also received strongly hostile reviews from critics, who denounced its extreme scenes of sex and violence and lack of narrative coherence.<ref name="ebert19800922">{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |title=Caligula movie review & film summary (1980) |newspaper=] |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=September 22, 1980 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=October 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201007010030/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |url-status=live }}</ref> Roger Ebert gave ''Caligula'' a zero-star rating, dubbing it "sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash", accusing it of being artistically vulgar in its depiction of sex and violence, and of having technically incompetent direction and structure.<ref name="ebert19800922"/> It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out on (two hours into its 170-minute running time), after describing himself as feeling "disgusted and unspeakably depressed".<ref name="ebert19800922"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/dont_read_me_first.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081018181430/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/dont_read_me_first.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 18, 2008 |title=Don't read me first! |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |date=October 16, 2008 |work=] |access-date=June 9, 2012}}</ref> Ebert also placed it on his "Most Hated" list and Michael Sauter selected it for ''The Worst Movies of All Time''.<ref name="eberthated"/>{{sfn|Sauter|page=266}} Australian newspaper '']'' stated that ''Caligula'' was being "billed by critics everywhere as one of the worst films ever made".<ref>{{cite news |title=News Diary |journal=] |date=June 8, 1981 |page=2}}</ref> '']'' later referred to ''Caligula'' as "possibly the worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite news |title=Lowest: 100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment |journal=] |date=July 24, 1999 |page=W17}}</ref> Joe Holleman, in an article in the '']'' discussing historical films set in Ancient Rome, argued, "two of the worst movies made in the 20th century were ancient Rome pieces ... '']'' and ''Caligula''".<ref>{{cite news |first=Joe |last=Holleman |title=Roman Warriors roam the big screen again |journal=] |date=May 5, 2000 |page=E1}}</ref> Christopher Armstead, reviewing ''Caligula'' for the website Film Critics United, stated, "Dollar for dollar, this could very well be the worst movie ever made."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://filmcriticsunited.com/caligula.html |title=Caligula |first=Christopher |last=Armstead |work=Film Critics United |access-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-date=January 10, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140110125709/http://filmcriticsunited.com/caligula.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2011, Sean Bell of '']'' wrote of its enduring legacy: "in the same way much of our attention-deficit civilisation may go through life vaguely aware that '']'' is a masterpiece without ever seeing it, ... we know that ''Caligula'' is awful, usually without ever finding out for ourselves."<ref>{{cite web |last=Bell |first=Sean |title='Caligula's Ghost: Why Cinema Needs Epic Failure More than Mediocre Success, PopMatters |url=https://www.popmatters.com/151468-caligulas-ghost-why-cinema-needs-epic-failure-more-than-mediocre-suc-2495917054.html |website=] |access-date=January 18, 2022 |date=December 1, 2011 |archive-date=January 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118182706/https://www.popmatters.com/151468-caligulas-ghost-why-cinema-needs-epic-failure-more-than-mediocre-suc-2495917054.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Although widely criticized, the film's "over-the-top combination of outré aesthetics exploitation-film tropes" has gained it cult status over time, and in 2024, ] released an extensive re-edit, ''Caligula: The Ultimate Cut'', incorporating alternate takes and unused footage from the ''Penthouse'' archives to enhance narrative coherence while shortening the film's overall length. In a review in ''The New York Times'', Elisabeth Vincentelli said that it is a "rare re-edited version of a movie that features ''less'' graphic sex and violence than the original."<ref name=NYTCaligula>{{cite news |last=Vincentelli |first=Elisabeth |title='Caligula: The Ultimate Cut' Review: The Emperor's New Clothes |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/15/movies/caligula-the-ultimate-cut-review.html |url-access=limited |date=August 15, 2024 |access-date=August 15, 2024 |work=The New York Times |location=New York City |quote=Even more crucial is the belief that a masterpiece lurks within the mangled original release. Now attempting to prove that theory is "Caligula: The Ultimate Cut," the latest iteration of a film that has gone through an unfathomable number of edits over the decades. This is the rare re-edited version of a movie that features ''less'' graphic sex and violence than the original. What kind of world are we living in?}}</ref> In an interview with ''The Guardian'', McDowell praised the removal of sexually explicit material added by Guccione, and said ''The Ultimate Cut'' is "very much the movie I thought I was making"."<ref>{{cite news |last=Pelley |first=Rich |title=Malcolm McDowell: 'Kubrick had stewed pears and sour chicken for lunch because Napoleon did' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/article/2024/aug/01/malcolm-mcdowell-kubrick-had-stewed-pears-and-chicken-for-lunch-because-napoleon-did |work=the Guardian |location=London |date=August 1, 2024 |access-date=August 15, 2024}}</ref> ''The Ultimate Cut'' holds an 64% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 39 reviews;<ref>{{cite web |title=Caligula: The Ultimate Cut |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/caligula_the_ultimate_cut |website=] |access-date=January 8, 2025 |publisher=] |language=en }}</ref> however, Brass has publicly disowned it.<ref name=NYTCaligula/> | |||
== 1980s == | |||
=== ''Heaven's Gate'' (theatrical version, 1980) === | |||
{{Main|Heaven's Gate (film){{!}}''Heaven's Gate'' (film)}} | |||
]'' destroyed the reputation of director ] and bankrupted film distributor ], though re-edits of the film have been met with critical reevaluation.]] | |||
The ] epic '']'', loosely based on the ] in 1890s ], was plagued by massive cost and time overruns, largely due to director ]'s extreme attention to detail. He demanded 50 takes of at least one scene and refused to start shooting for another until a cloud he liked rolled across the sky. It cost over $44 million, but brought in only $3.5 million at the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Bukszpan |first=Daniel |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2012/03/20/The-15-Biggest-Box-Office-Bombs.html?slide=9 |title=The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs -> 8. Heaven's Gate (1980) |publisher=] |date=March 20, 2012 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=June 10, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110610231738/http://www.cnbc.com/id/38815985?slide=9 |url-status=live }}</ref> The original version ran at nearly four hours, but was pulled from release after only one week due to scathing reviews. It later resurfaced in a 149-minute version, but by then the damage was done. The film effectively ended not only the existence of ] as an independent Hollywood studio (its parent firm sold the company to ], where it operated until 2019), but also, largely, Cimino's career; initially considered a director on the rise after directing '']'' (which won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director), his reputation never recovered after ''Heaven's Gate''.<ref name="50decisions"/> The production is also notorious for the cruelty to animals that occurred both on screen and on site, including deliberately killing a horse with explosives.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1986/03/24/movies/cruel-camera-about-animal-abuse.html |date=March 24, 1986 |last=Corry |first=John |title='Cruel, Camera,' About Animal Abuse |work=] |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=February 17, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210217004121/https://www.nytimes.com/1986/03/24/movies/cruel-camera-about-animal-abuse.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The controversies surrounding ''Heaven's Gate''{{'}}s failure are credited for having a role in ending the "]" of the 1970s, with studios subsequently taking control back from directors.<ref name="50decisions"/> | |||
] called it "an unqualified disaster", among other things. Roger Ebert called it "the most scandalous cinematic waste I've ever seen".<ref>{{cite news |author-link=Roger Ebert |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 1, 1981 |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/heavens-gate-1981 |title=Heaven's Gate movie review & film summary (1981) |work=] |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=October 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191017192105/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/heavens-gate-1981 |url-status=live }}</ref> After word of his grandiose spending and defiant nature toward studio United Artists got out (detailed in ''Final Cut'' by ], a studio executive involved with the film from the beginning),<ref>{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/finalcutartmoney00bach |url-access=registration |page= |quote=heaven's gate april 16 1979. |isbn=9781557043740 |title=Final Cut: Art, Money, and Ego in the Making of Heaven's Gate, the Film that Sank United Artists |year=1999 |publisher=] |last=Bach |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Bach}}</ref> Cimino was awarded the 1980 ], and the film was nominated for four more Razzies, including Worst Picture.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=21 |title=Summary of 1981 Razzies |work=Razzies.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116032635/http://razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=21 |archive-date=January 16, 2014}}</ref> In 1999, '']'' placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century, and '']'' ranked it as one of the worst decisions in movie history.<ref name="worstideas"/><ref name="50decisions"/> In 2008, ] of '']'' called it the worst film ever made, saying that it "defies belief".<ref name="queenan"/> Readers of film magazine '']'' later voted ''Heaven's Gate'' the sixth-worst film of all time, and ''Vanity Fair'' included it in its list of the worst films ever made.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/><ref name="italianvanity"/> | |||
Despite the vicious reviews, the film's reputation improved over time.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-heavens-gate |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |title=Movie of the Week: "Heaven's Gate" |magazine=] |date=November 25, 2015 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=September 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926084352/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-heavens-gate |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Holmes |first=Linda |title='My Year Of Flops': A Very Good Book About Some Very Bad Movies |url=https://www.npr.org/2010/10/19/130669942/my-year-of-flops-a-very-good-book-about-some-very-bad-movies |publisher=] |access-date=January 22, 2022 |language=en |date=October 19, 2010 |archive-date=February 2, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202035326/https://www.npr.org/2010/10/19/130669942/my-year-of-flops-a-very-good-book-about-some-very-bad-movies |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="2024lineup">{{Cite web |date=Feb 14, 2024 |title=The Criterion Channel's March 2024 Lineup |url=https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/8388-the-criterion-channels-march-2024-lineup |website=The Criterion Channel |access-date=March 1, 2024 |archive-date=March 1, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240301234818/https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/8388-the-criterion-channels-march-2024-lineup |url-status=live }}</ref> In fall of 2012, the ], the venue for its infamous opening, premiered the restored director's cut. In stark contrast, '']'' called the restored version "a modern masterpiece" and its 1980 cut "one of the greatest injustices of cinematic history".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film/article3554129.ece |title=Heaven's Gate: box office turkey that sank a studio is a modern masterpiece |last=Hoyle |first=Ben |newspaper=] |date=October 1, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=August 26, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160826001131/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film/article3554129.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> The film has also been released on Blu-ray and DVD by the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.criterion.com/films/28036-heaven-s-gate|title=Heaven's Gate|website=The Criterion Collection|access-date=November 15, 2018|archive-date=November 16, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116000911/https://www.criterion.com/films/28036-heaven-s-gate|url-status=live}}</ref> ] of '']'' said that the film "has been called a disaster and a disgrace, yet also anointed a masterpiece."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/movies/michael-ciminos-heavens-gate-returns-to-film-forum.html |title=The Second Coming of 'Heaven's Gate' |last=Dargis |first=Manohla |author-link=Manohla Dargis |date=March 15, 2013 |access-date=June 13, 2013 |work=] |archive-date=March 25, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130325031349/http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/movies/michael-ciminos-heavens-gate-returns-to-film-forum.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2023, the French magazine '']'' ranked it 17th in its list of the 100 greatest films in the history of cinema, describing the work as "a post-classical, lyrical, and disenchanted Western".<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.telerama.fr/cinema/les-100-meilleurs-films-de-l-histoire-selon-telerama-0116-9283.php | title=Les 100 meilleurs films de l'histoire selon "Télérama" |magazine=] |date=August 16, 2023 |access-date=November 12, 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Apple'' (1980) === | |||
{{Main|The Apple (1980 film){{!}}''The Apple'' (1980 film)}} | |||
''The Apple'' (also called ''Star Rock'') is a 1980 ] ] ] written and directed by ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.insidehook.com/article/movies/movies-disco-1980-the-apple-xanadu|title=Revisiting 1980, The Year the Movies Killed Disco|website=InsideHook|access-date=October 10, 2022|archive-date=October 10, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010135429/https://www.insidehook.com/article/movies/movies-disco-1980-the-apple-xanadu|url-status=live}}</ref> It stars ] as a young singer named Bibi, who, in a futuristic 1994, signs to an evil label named Boogalow International Music. It deals with themes of conformity versus rebellion, and makes use of ], including that of ] and the ].<ref name="Flavorwire2">{{cite web |last=Bailey |first=Jason |title=Bad Movie Night: The Distinctive Disco Cheese of 'The Apple' |url=http://flavorwire.com/607226/bad-movie-night-the-distinctive-disco-cheese-of-the-apple |date=July 10, 2017 |access-date=December 9, 2017 |website=] |language=en |archive-date=December 10, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171210015918/http://flavorwire.com/607226/bad-movie-night-the-distinctive-disco-cheese-of-the-apple |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Common criticism from both reviews that appeared in trade publications and major news outlets and the audience were a lack of originality,<ref name="afi"/> a weak script,<ref name="afi">{{cite web|url=http://www.afi.com/members/catalog/DetailView.aspx?s=&Movie=56362|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170710142839/http://www.afi.com/members/catalog/DetailView.aspx?s=&Movie=56362|publisher=]|title=The Apple|access-date=January 31, 2016|archive-date=July 10, 2017}}</ref> uninspired music,<ref name="afi"/> poor execution,<ref name="afi"/> and Golan's inexperienced take on ].<ref name="SlashFilm2"/> During the 1980 ], some members of the audience threw ] of music from the film at the screen.<ref name="SlashFilm2">{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Blake |title=The Apple Oral History: How Did This Get Made |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/542502/the-apple-oral-history/ |website=] |access-date=January 12, 2022 |date=February 5, 2016 |archive-date=January 12, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112025341/https://www.slashfilm.com/542502/the-apple-oral-history/ |url-status=live }}</ref> At the ], the film received seven nominations (including Worst Picture) and won two awards: Worst Director (Golan) and Least "Special" Special Effects.<ref name="Past Winners Database">{{Cite web|url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1980/1980st.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070815004414/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1980/1980st.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 15, 2007|title=Past Winners Database|work=] |date=August 15, 2007}}</ref> Stinkers co-founder Mike Lancaster later selected ''The Apple'' as the worst film he had ever seen.<ref name="Lancaster">{{cite web |title=Q & A with the Stinkers |url=http://thestinkers.com/qanda.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010413025218/http://thestinkers.com/qanda.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 13, 2001 |website=] |access-date=July 9, 2022}}</ref> '']'' listed it as the worst movie musical ever,<ref>{{cite web |title=The Worst Movie Musicals Ever |url=https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/08/the-worst-movie-musicals-ever/ |work=] |last=Brownfield |first=Troy |access-date=January 11, 2022 |date=August 7, 2020 |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111170729/https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/08/the-worst-movie-musicals-ever/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and critic Tim Brayton described it as "A completely unadulterated bundle of the worst of cinema all spun up into one ball of madness. It cannot be described, and it can barely be experienced."<ref name="rtapple">{{cite web |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1001131-apple/ |title=The Apple (1980) |work=] |publisher=] |access-date=July 7, 2019 |archive-date=August 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805172044/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1001131-apple |url-status=live }}</ref> Sean Burns in '']'' wrote: "''The Apple'' isn't just the worst disco musical ever made; it could very well be the worst movie ever made, period."<ref>{{cite news |title=Summer Camp |first=Sean |last=Burns |newspaper=] |date=July 12, 2006}}</ref> ''The Apple'' was included in '']''{{'}}s ''Bad Movie Diaries'' column, where critic Kenneth Lowe described it as "without a doubt the most cringe-inducing, the most mortifying, the absolutely most embarrassing feature we've ever watched."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lowe |first1=Kenneth |last2=Vorel |first2=Jim |title=Bad Movie Diaries: The Apple (1980) |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-the-apple-1980/ |website=] |access-date=January 11, 2022 |language=en |date=February 19, 2020 |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111133434/https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-the-apple-1980/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It has also been covered by the '']'' podcast and '']''{{'}}s ''Bad Movie Night'' column and '']'' listed it as one of the "Ten Really Bad Movies that Define 'Bad Movies'".<ref name="SlashFilm2"/><ref name="Flavorwire2"/><ref name="mental floss10"/> | |||
=== ''Inchon'' (1981) === <!-- This qualifies as a 1981 film, for it made its world premiere a year prior to its general release, a few months before "Mommie Dearest". --> | |||
{{Main|Inchon (film){{!}}''Inchon'' (film)}} | |||
The ] ''Inchon'', directed by ] and starring ] as General ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/3139/inchon|title=Inchon|website=tcm.com|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=July 13, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220713185127/https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/3139/inchon|url-status=live}}</ref> was meant to depict the ] during the ]. Producer Mitsuharu Ishii was a senior member of the Japanese branch of the ], whose leader, ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiWctDyWhDI|title=Slate's Bad Movies: Oscar Slumming|date=March 3, 2008 |via=YouTube|access-date=November 12, 2019|archive-date=March 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200312071510/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiWctDyWhDI&gl=US&hl=en|url-status=live}}</ref> claimed he had the film made to show MacArthur's spirituality and connection to God and the Japanese people.<ref>]</ref> Its eventual production cost of $46 million resulted in a $5 million box-office gross, and '']'' review written by ] calls the movie "the most expensive B-movie ever".<ref>{{cite news |title=Inchon (1981) – 'Inchon,' At Last |first=Vincent |last=Canby |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A03E0D8123BF934A2575AC0A964948260 |work=The New York Times |date=September 17, 1982 |access-date=February 10, 2017 |archive-date=February 15, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120215194638/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9A03E0D8123BF934A2575AC0A964948260 |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' described ''Inchon'' as "one of the biggest commercial disasters in film history".<ref>{{cite news |title =Terence Young dies – Directed Bond movies | newspaper =] |page =B6 |date =September 9, 1994}}</ref> Every conceivable kind of problem plagued production, including labor issues, the U.S. military withdrawing support due to the film's Unification Church connection, weather and natural disasters, customs difficulties, expensive directorial blunders, and the original director (]) quitting before the start of production. Olivier's performance was criticized, and he was awarded the ] for Worst Actor.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=332&PN=3 |title=1982 Razzie Nominees & "Winners" – The Official Razzie Forum |work=Razzies.com |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820075540/http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=332&PN=3 |archive-date=August 20, 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The film itself took the 1982 Razzies for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and Young's direction earned him a tie for Worst Director of 1982. A number of reviewers at various media outlets described ''Inchon'' as the worst film ever made, including ''The Washington Post'',<ref>{{cite news |last=Mayo |first=Mike |title =Hollywood's untapped resources – worthwhile movies don't always make it to video | newspaper =] |date =April 13, 1997 |page=G7}}</ref> ''Newsweek'',<ref>{{cite news |last=Boedeker |first=Hal |title =The Magic of Olivier his film legacy sets standard for all actors | work =] |page =36G |date =July 21, 1989 |quote=The worst of his choices was probably taking on the role of Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1982's Inchon. ''Newsweek'' called Inchon 'the worst movie ever made, a turkey the size of Godzilla.'}}</ref> ''TV Guide'',<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://movies.tvguide.com/inchon/review/102041 |title=Inchon Review |magazine=] |date=November 28, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=October 4, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004195720/http://movies.tvguide.com/inchon/review/102041 |url-status=live }}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=McKay |first=John (]) |title =Welch fleshes out worst in film | work =The Record (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada) |page =E4 |date =March 23, 2004}}</ref> ''Inchon'' was later profiled in multiple books on worst in film, including '']'' by Harry and Michael Medved,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Medved |first1=Harry |first2=Michael |last2=Medved |author2-link=Michael Medved |title=The Hollywood Hall of Shame: The Most Expensive Flops in Movie History |publisher=Perigee Books |location=], ] |year=1984 |pages= |isbn=0-399-51060-5 |title-link=The Hollywood Hall of Shame }}</ref> and ''The Worst Movies of All Time'' by Michael Sauter.{{sfn|Sauter|page=197}} To date, ''Inchon'' has never been released on home video in the United States although it was aired on the church's Good Life TV Network. | |||
=== ''Tarzan, the Ape Man'' (1981) === | |||
{{Main|Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981 film){{!}}''Tarzan, the Ape Man'' (1981 film)}} | |||
The ] ''Tarzan, the Ape Man'', loosely based on the novel '']'' by ], stars ] (who would later star in the 1982 '']'' knock-off '']'', which ] featured in two episodes of the TV series '']'') in the ] and ] as his partner ], and is told from Jane's point of view. Despite being a box-office success, critics poorly received it upon its release due to its poor screenplay, bad acting, and unintentional humor. ], writing for his ''Movie Guide'', stated that the film "lacks action, humor and charm", and considered it so bad that it "nearly forced editors of this book to devise a rating lower than BOMB".<ref name="Maltin01211"/> ] was equally harsh; he described ''Tarzan, the Ape Man'' as "certainly the worst of the Tarzan movies and possibly the banalest film so far made; even the animals give poor performances".<ref>Leslie Halliwell, John Walker, ''Halliwell's Film Guide''. HarperPerennial, 1996 (p. 1119).</ref> Writer Thomas S. Hischak described it thus: "Produced and directed without a shred of talent by ], ''Tarzan, the Ape Man'' often ranks high in the lists of the worst movies ever made."<ref>Thomas S. Hischak, ''American Literature on Stage and Screen: 525 Works and Their Adaptations'' McFarland, 2012. {{ISBN|0-7864-9279-1}} (p. 237)</ref> Film critic John Nesbit considered it "my pick for worst film ever",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://oldschoolreviews.com/rev_80/tarzan.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304212347/http://oldschoolreviews.com/rev_80/tarzan.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 4, 2014 |title=John Derek, Tarzan the Ape Man |publisher=Old School Reviews |access-date=March 5, 2014}}</ref> while Matt Brunson of '']'' wrote, "this cinematic atrocity truly is one of the all-time worsts".<ref>{{cite web |last=Brunson |first=Matt |url=http://clclt.com/charlotte/view-from-the-couch/Content?oid=2354590 |title=View From The Couch | View from the Couch | Creative Loafing Charlotte |work=Clclt.com |date=June 16, 2004 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304051036/http://clclt.com/charlotte/view-from-the-couch/Content?oid=2354590 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Tarzan, the Ape Man'' was nominated for six awards at the ], winning one for Worst Actress (Bo Derek). It holds a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 20 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/1020897-tarzan_the_ape_man|title=Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=January 30, 2021|archive-date=March 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307075545/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1020897-tarzan_the_ape_man|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Mommie Dearest'' (1981) === | |||
{{Main|Mommie Dearest (film){{!}}''Mommie Dearest'' (film)}} | |||
] (pictured in '']'', also on this list) regretted her ]-winning portrayal of actress ] in the ] '']'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonblade.com/2021/10/14/camp-classic-mommie-dearest-turns-40/|title=Camp classic 'Mommie Dearest' turns 40|first=Gregg|last=Shapiro|date=October 14, 2021|access-date=October 22, 2021|archive-date=October 22, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211022143742/https://www.washingtonblade.com/2021/10/14/camp-classic-mommie-dearest-turns-40/|url-status=live}}</ref> yet it earned a spot at number 41 on ].]] | |||
''Mommie Dearest'', directed by ],<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://collider.com/mommie-dearest-oscars-cult-classic/ |title=How 'Mommie Dearest' Went From Oscar Bait to Cult Classic{{!}}Collider |website=] |date=March 10, 2023 |access-date=December 10, 2023 |archive-date=July 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230722215022/https://collider.com/mommie-dearest-oscars-cult-classic/ |url-status=live }}</ref> was based on the ] by ], about her upbringing by ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/de/films/mommie-dearest|title=Meine liebe Rabenmutter|via=mubi.com|access-date=January 28, 2019|archive-date=January 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190129005847/https://mubi.com/de/films/mommie-dearest|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2006-06-06-0606060260-story.html|title='Mommie Dearest' meets John Waters|website=Chicago Tribune|date=June 6, 2006|access-date=June 5, 2021|archive-date=July 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210731191016/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2006-06-06-0606060260-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/moviedetails/68145|title=AFI|Catalog|website=catalog.afi.com|access-date=June 5, 2021|archive-date=June 5, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210605163811/https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/moviedetails/68145|url-status=live}}</ref> It was the first film to sweep the Golden Raspberry Awards nominations, winning a total of five Razzies out of the nine nominations, including "Worst Picture" and Worst Actress (], shared with ]).{{sfn|Adams|page=188}} The same organization also named it "Worst Picture of the Decade" in 1989/90, and was nominated for "Worst Drama of Our First 25 Years" in 2004/05.<ref name="GR1">{{cite news|url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=12|title=Decade's Worst -The 80's|last=Wilson |first=John |author-link=John J. B. Wilson |publisher=]|date=March 15, 1990|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130511065558/http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=12|archive-date=May 11, 2013}}</ref> The film is part of the "100 most awful" in ''The Official Razzie Movie Guide'' and Michael Sauter's ''The Worst Movies of All Time''.<ref name="OFMG">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/2005-02-24-razzies_x.htm|title=Razzies still knocking Hollywood down a peg after 25 years|publisher=] / ]|date=February 24, 2005|access-date=October 11, 2020|archive-date=February 5, 2013|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130205085925/http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/movieawards/2005-02-24-razzies_x.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=ORG>{{cite book |last=Wilson |first=John |title =The official Razzie movie guide: enjoying the best of Hollywood's worst |publisher =] |year =2005 |isbn =0-446-69334-0}}</ref>{{sfn|Sauter|page=189}} It earned, as film critic and TV host ] put it, "some of the nastiest reviews ever".<ref name=RW>{{cite book |last=Crouse |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Crouse |title =Reel Winners: Movie Award Trivia |publisher =] |year =2005 |page = |isbn =1-55002-574-0 |url =https://archive.org/details/reelwinnersmovie0000crou/page/123 }}</ref> Eric Henderson of '']'' named it at the top of his "Best 'Worst Movies Ever{{'"}} list.<ref name="WCCO">{{cite news|url=http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2010/07/21/movie-blog-best-worst-movies-ever/|title=Movie Blog: Best 'Worst Movies Ever'|last=Henderson|first=Eric|publisher=]|date=June 21, 2010|access-date=June 13, 2013|archive-date=October 4, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151004063910/http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2010/07/21/movie-blog-best-worst-movies-ever/|url-status=live}}</ref> Roger Ebert wrote of this film, "I can't imagine who would want to subject themselves to this movie. 'Mommie Dearest' is a painful experience that drones on endlessly, as Joan Crawford's relationship with her daughter, Christina, disintegrates from cruelty through jealousy into pathos."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mommie-dearest-1981 |title=Mommie Dearest movie review & film summary (1981) |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |work=] |date=January 1, 1981 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=November 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111205638/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mommie-dearest-1981 |url-status=live }}</ref> Of the performance of Faye Dunaway, '']'' said "Dunaway does not chew scenery. Dunaway starts neatly at each corner of the set in every scene and swallows it whole, co-stars and all."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://variety.com/1980/film/reviews/mommie-dearest-1200424940/ |title=Mommie Dearest Review – Read Variety's Analysis Of The Movie Mommie Dearest |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140715082555/http://variety.com/1980/film/reviews/mommie-dearest-1200424940/|archive-date=2014-07-15 |work=Variety |date=January 1, 1981}}</ref> ''Vanity Fair'' and Rotten Tomatoes subsequently included ''Mommie Dearest'' on their worst film lists.<ref name="italianvanity"/><ref name="sobad"/> | |||
Despite the reviews at the time,<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/joan-crawfords-explosive-offscreen-life |title=Joan Crawford's Explosive Offscreen Life |last=Brody |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Brody |magazine=] |date=May 26, 2017 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |archive-date=January 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116100845/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/joan-crawfords-explosive-offscreen-life |url-status=live }}</ref> the film was a box-office success, grossing $39 million worldwide on a $5 million budget. It has a 50% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 46 reviews. The site's consensus reads, "''Mommie Dearest'' certainly doesn't lack for conviction, and neither does Faye Dunaway's legendary performance as a wire-wielding monster; unfortunately, the movie is too campy and undisciplined to transcend guilty pleasure".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mommie_dearest/ |title=Mommie Dearest (1981) |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=January 30, 2021 |archive-date=April 16, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190416101214/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/mommie_dearest/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== ''Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam'' (''The Man Who Saves the World'') (1982) === | |||
{{Main|Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam{{!}}''Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam''}} | |||
The Turkish science-fiction adventure ''Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam'' (also commonly known as ''Turkish Star Wars'') was directed by ] and starred ]. It is notorious for illegally using footage from well-known science fiction films and shows, most notably '']'', along with stealing the music score from films such as '']'' and '']''. The film is also criticized for its nonsensical plot, badly written dialogue, and crude special effects.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A197912 |title=There Is No Try...: Foleyvision does the Turkish 'Star Wars' Austin Screens |publisher=AustinChronicle.com |date=February 20, 2004 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=September 18, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918185247/http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid:197912 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://filmthreat.com/reviews/2341/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100312030851/https://filmthreat.com/reviews/2341/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 12, 2010 |title=The Turkish Star Wars |publisher=Film Threat |date=May 18, 2005 |access-date=January 17, 2011 }}</ref> It is also a fantasy ], heavily influenced by 1970s ] from ].<ref name="Goldweber">{{cite book |last=Goldweber |first=David Elroy |title=Claws & Saucers: Science Fiction, Horror, and Fantasy Film 1902-1982: A Complete Guide |date=2015 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-312-28803-4 |page=1773 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hgJJzgEACAAJ&pg=PT1773 |access-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-date=February 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240227175610/https://books.google.com/books?id=hgJJzgEACAAJ&pg=PT1773 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Jos Kirps of ] called it "The Worst Movie Ever", and stated, "There are many bad sci-fi movies, and for many years movie addicts even considered Ed Wood's ''Plan 9 From Outer Space'' the worst movie of all times. But ''Plan 9'' is still a pretty good movie when compared to ''Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam''."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.contour2002.org/article/the-worst-movie-ever-a-turkish-star-wars-clone|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140810150129/http://www.contour2002.org/article/the-worst-movie-ever-a-turkish-star-wars-clone|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 10, 2014|title=Contour2002.org|access-date=October 1, 2014}}</ref> '']'' called it the "world's worst film".<ref>{{Cite web |language=tr |url=http://www.sabah.com.tr/Gunaydin/Magazin/2012/04/15/turkun-uzayla-imtihani-nereye-kadar-surecek |title=News article from Sabah newspaper |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160530010134/http://www.sabah.com.tr/gunaydin/magazin/2012/04/15/turkun-uzayla-imtihani-nereye-kadar-surecek |archive-date=May 30, 2016 |access-date=August 29, 2013}}</ref> '']'' described the film as "sitting on the throne of the king" when compared to other "so bad it's good" ]s.<ref>{{Cite web |language=tr |url=http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20291864.asp |title=News article from Hürriyet |date=April 7, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302134628/http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20291864.asp |archive-date=March 2, 2016 |access-date=August 29, 2013}}</ref> ''Toronto Standard'' called it a "dollar-store Star Wars" and compared it to the works of Ed Wood.<ref>{{cite news|title= Dollar-store Star Wars|publisher= Toronto Standard|date= May 4, 2012|url= http://torontostandard.com/culture/dollar-store-star-wars|access-date= August 24, 2013|archive-date= September 26, 2018|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180926123159/http://www.torontostandard.com/culture/dollar-store-star-wars/|url-status= live}}</ref> When it became apparent that the film had inspired an enthusiastic international cult, a sequel, ''The Son of the Man Who Saved the World'' (]), was shot in 2006 and featured many returning members of the original cast and crew.<ref>{{cite web|language=tr |url=http://www.sabah.com.tr/2006/04/13/gny/gny119-20060413-200.html |title=News article from Sabah newspaper |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090808044254/http://www.sabah.com.tr/2006/04/13/gny/gny119-20060413-200.html |archive-date=August 8, 2009 |access-date=July 29, 2006}}</ref> The film was included on ''Time Out''{{'}}s 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.<ref name="timeoutlist"/> | |||
=== ''Howard the Duck'' (1986) === | |||
{{Main|Howard the Duck (film){{!}}''Howard the Duck'' (film)}} | |||
Directed by ], written by Huyck and ], and produced by ], it is based on the ] ]. ''Howard the Duck'' received overwhelmingly negative reviews from film critics. '']'' writer Marc Weinberg and Leonard Maltin criticized the decision to shoot the film in live action.<ref>{{cite magazine |last= Weinberg |first= Marc |date = 1986 |title = Out-Foxed | magazine= ] | volume = 12 | issue = 9 |pages = 143–144 }}</ref><ref name="Maltin">{{cite book |last= Maltin |first= Leonard |title = Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide |year = 2008 |publisher = Penguin Group |isbn = 978-0-452-28978-9 |page = |chapter = H |url = https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780452289789/page/641 }}</ref> The appearance of Howard was criticized as being unconvincing due to his poorly functioning mouth and expressionless face. Reviewers also criticized the acting and humor and found the film boring.<ref name="Stanley">{{cite book |last= Stanley |first= John |title = Creature Features: The Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide |year = 2000 |publisher = Berkley Boulevard Books |page = 253 |isbn = 0-425-17517-0 | quote = For one, the duck costume and makeup are phony — Howard looks like a midget in a Halloween costume. }}</ref><ref name="Hunter">{{cite book |last= Hunter |first= Lew |title = Lew Hunter's Screenwriting 434: The Industry's Premier Teacher Reveals the Secrets of the Successful Screenplay |year = 2004 |publisher = Perigee |isbn = 0-399-52986-1 |page = 21 |chapter = Nothing in the Mind, Please | quote = Because we all know what a duck looks like, Lucas could not get an audience to suspend their belief that Howard was a little person in a duck suit. }}</ref> ] of the '']'' said the movie's "crude, often embarrassing, sex jokes" seemed "out of place" with the more innocent aspects of the film.<ref name="DaveKehrHowardTheDuck">{{cite news|last=Kehr|first=Dave|date= August 1, 1986|title= UNLOVABLE DUCK MAKES 'HOWARD' AN UNLOVABLE FILM|work= ]|url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-08-01-8602250309-story.html|access-date= May 13, 2021|archive-date= October 24, 2020|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201024095717/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-08-01-8602250309-story.html|url-status= live}}</ref> Jay Carr of '']'' claimed that "They Don't Get Much Worse Than ''Howard''{{-"}},<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/294411402|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151018024531/https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/doc/294411402.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug%201,%201986&author=Jay%20Carr,%20Globe%20Staff&pub=Boston%20Globe%20%28pre-1997%20Fulltext%29&edition=&startpage=&desc=THEY%20DON%27T%20GET%20MUCH%20WORSE%20THAN%20%27HOWARD%27|title=They Don't Get Much Worse Than 'Howard'|work=]|url-access=subscription|access-date=September 30, 2013|first=Jay|last=Carr|date=August 1, 1986|url-status=live|archive-date=October 18, 2015| id={{ProQuest|294411402}} }}</ref> Glenn Heath Jr. of '']'' wrote that it "has a rightful place in the canon of worst films ever",<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2011/07/summer-of-86-tarred-and-feathered-howard-the-duck/|title=Summer of '86: Tarred and Feathered: Howard the Duck|work=]|date=July 28, 2011|access-date=March 14, 2014|archive-date=March 16, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140316105914/http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2011/07/summer-of-86-tarred-and-feathered-howard-the-duck/|url-status=live}}</ref> and '']'' states it is "one of the worst big-budget movies ever made".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://movies.tvguide.com/howard-the-duck/review/101469|title=Howard the Duck|work=]|access-date=March 14, 2014|archive-date=September 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930202246/http://movies.tvguide.com/howard-the-duck/review/101469|url-status=dead}}</ref> It was featured in ''Empire''{{'}}s poll of the 50 worst films ever made,<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> and '']'' and ''Vanity Fair'' have included it on their worst film lists.<ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="italianvanity"/> | |||
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 13% based on 86 reviews, making it the lowest-rated ] production of those reviewed on the site. The site's consensus states: "While it has its moments, ''Howard the Duck'' suffers from an uneven tone and mediocre performances."<ref name="Tomatoes">{{cite web |url = https://rottentomatoes.com/m/howard_the_duck/ |title = ''Howard the Duck'' (1986) | website = ] |publisher = ] |access-date = January 15, 2025 |archive-date = August 3, 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140803155451/https://rottentomatoes.com/m/howard_the_duck/ |url-status = live }}</ref> It received seven ] nominations in 1987 including ] (]), ] (Willard Huyck) and ] ("Howard the Duck"). It won four trophies for ], ] ("the six guys and gals in the duck suit"), Worst Visual Effects, and ], tied with '']''.<ref name="Razzies">{{cite web |last= Wilson |first= John |title = 1986 Archive |url = http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=25 |publisher = ] |access-date = October 11, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130602153152/http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=25 |archive-date = June 2, 2013 }}</ref> The movie also won a ] for Worst Picture.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1986/1986st.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061017172107/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1986/1986st.htm|archive-date=October 17, 2006|title=1986 9th Hastings Bad Cinema Society Stinkers Awards|access-date=April 2, 2013|work=]|publisher=]}}</ref> The negative reaction to the film took its toll on the cast, who found themselves unable to work on other projects as a result.<ref name="Release-2">{{cite video |people=Thompson, Lea; Jones, Jeffrey; Gale, Ed |date=2009 |title=Releasing the Duck |medium=DVD |publisher=Universal Home Video |id=UPC 025195052306}}</ref> | |||
Over time, the film has remained a source of fascination and developed "a small, but loyal fanbase."<ref name="PrimerStories">{{cite web |last= Chipman |first= Bob |title = Duck Fails Hollywood Bets It All on Duck Boners |url = https://www.primerand.co/5/howard | work = Primer&Co. |access-date = May 9, 2021 |archive-date = September 27, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210927081429/https://www.primerand.co/5/howard |url-status = dead }}</ref><ref name="YahooTimRobbins">{{cite web |last= Alter |first= Ethan |title = Role Recall: Tim Robbins on being in the first Marvel movie, where his 'Bull Durham' character is now and the one thing he still has from 'The Shawshank Redemption' |url = https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tim-robbins-role-recall-shawshank-redemption-bull-durham-howard-the-duck-mystic-river-the-player-hudsucker-proxy-jacobs-ladder-181140444.html | work = Yahoo |date = October 11, 2019 |access-date = May 10, 2021 |archive-date = May 11, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210511044758/https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tim-robbins-role-recall-shawshank-redemption-bull-durham-howard-the-duck-mystic-river-the-player-hudsucker-proxy-jacobs-ladder-181140444.html |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2434140/lea-thompson-is-pitching-a-howard-the-duck-movie-to-marvel|title=Lea Thompson Is Pitching A Howard The Duck Movie To Marvel|first1=Dirk|last1=Libbey|date=June 12, 2018|website=CINEMABLEND|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190111232640/https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2434140/lea-thompson-is-pitching-a-howard-the-duck-movie-to-marvel|url-status=live}}</ref> Howard the Duck has appeared in several ] movies and series beginning in 2014's '']'', in which he was voiced by ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Guardians-Galaxy-End-Credits-Sequence-Explained-66562.html|title=Guardians Of The Galaxy End Credits Sequence Explained|last=Eisenberg|first=Eric|date=August 1, 2014|website=CinemaBlend|access-date=April 16, 2019|archive-date=April 15, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190415082055/https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Guardians-Galaxy-End-Credits-Sequence-Explained-66562.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/seth-green-howard-the-duck-mcu-james-gunn|title=Seth Green would voice Howard the Duck in the MCU again 'anytime they asked'|date=July 20, 2020|website=SYFY Official Site|access-date=July 13, 2022|archive-date=October 25, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231025173448/https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/seth-green-howard-the-duck-mcu-james-gunn|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Ishtar'' (1987) === | |||
{{Main|Ishtar (film){{!}}''Ishtar'' (film)}} | |||
]'' director ]<ref name="2024lineup"/> defended her 1987 box office flop, stating, "If all of the people who hate ''Ishtar'' had seen it, I would be a rich woman today."<ref name="elainemay">{{Cite web|url=https://forward.com/culture/434193/elaine-may-mounting-a-comeback-at-87-is-directing-a-new-film/|title=Elaine May, Mounting A Comeback At 87, Is Directing A New Film|last=Grisar|first=PJ|work=]|access-date=April 28, 2020|date=November 4, 2019|archive-date=November 5, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105155049/https://forward.com/culture/434193/elaine-may-mounting-a-comeback-at-87-is-directing-a-new-film/|url-status=live}}</ref>]] | |||
''Ishtar'' was written and directed by ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/the-not-so-savage-messiahs|title=The Not-So-Savage Messiahs|date=August 5, 2013|website=MUBI|access-date=August 2, 2022|archive-date=August 17, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220817111104/https://mubi.com/notebook/posts/the-not-so-savage-messiahs|url-status=live}}</ref> and starred ]-winning duo ] and ] as an ode to the '']'' film series featuring ] and ]. Beatty and Hoffman star as Rogers and Clarke, two untalented lounge singers who travel to ] in hopes of finding a gig.<ref name="brody">{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-ishtar|title=Movie of the Week: "Ishtar"|last=Brody|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Brody|magazine=]|access-date=February 11, 2019|date=August 6, 2015|archive-date=January 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190109004100/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/movie-of-the-week-ishtar|url-status=live}}</ref> Due to unanticipated problems with filming in the desert—which resulted in numerous reshoots—the film ran over budget by $30 million. While its final budget cost was $55 million, ''Ishtar'' earned only $14,375,181 at the North American box office, leading ''Ishtar'' to become synonymous with "]". It was also subject to harsh reviews from critics. The film was nominated for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay in the ], winning one for Worst Director. ''The ]'' claimed that "Time has not improved this film's reputation as being one of the worst ever made."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/movies-dvd/ci_17017300 |title=Review: 'Dinner for Schmucks' a savory comedy |newspaper=] |date=May 1, 2011 |access-date=September 20, 2013 |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921061311/http://www.mercurynews.com/movies-dvd/ci_17017300 |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' suggested it was "so bad it could have been deliberate", and called it "one of the worst films ever made",<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.timeout.com/london/film/ishtar |title=Ishtar |magazine=] |access-date=February 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181115225621/https://www.timeout.com/london/film/ishtar |url-status=live }}</ref> while ] referred to it as "The '']'' of big-budget, A-list vehicular homicides."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/22/what-were-the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ |title=What were the worst movies of all time? |first=Ed |last=Morrissey |author-link=Ed Morrissey |date=February 22, 2009 |publisher=] |access-date=September 20, 2013 |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060444/http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/22/what-were-the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was included in Michael Sauter's ''The Worst Movies of All Time'' book, Rotten Tomatoes placed it amongst "25 Moves So Bad They're Unmissable" and ] included it on his list of the 40 worst films he had seen.{{sfn|Sauter|page=213–216}}<ref name="RichardRoeper">Richard Roeper, 10 Sure Signs a Movie Character is Doomed and Other Surprising Movie Lists, New York: Hyperion Books, 2003, pp. 66–67</ref><ref name="sobad"/> In 1999, '']'' placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century.<ref name="worstideas">{{cite magazine |url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,991230,00.html |title=The 100 Worst Ideas Of The Century |date=June 14, 1999 |access-date=April 8, 2018 |url-access=subscription |magazine=] |first1=Melissa |last1=August |first2=Harriet |last2=Barovick |first3=Michelle |last3=Derrow |first4=Tam |last4=Gray |first5=Daniel S. |last5=Levy |first6=Lina |last6=Lofaro |first7=David |last7=Spitz |first8=Joel |last8=Stein |first9=Chris |last9=Taylor |archive-date=October 21, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021051659/http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,991230,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The film has since become a cult classic.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.filminquiry.com/10-movies-low-ratings-actually-good/|title=10 Movies With Low Ratings That Are Actually Good|first=Alistair|last=Ryder|date=August 6, 2015|website=Film Inquiry|access-date=January 11, 2019|archive-date=January 12, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190112044239/https://www.filminquiry.com/10-movies-low-ratings-actually-good/|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Ishtar'' has seen a minor critical re-evaluation from some critics like ],<ref name="brody"/> and directors ], ], and ] have praised it in interviews.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiewire.com/2020/05/ishtar-box-office-flop-game-changer-setback-female-directors-1202231739/|title='Ishtar': How Hollywood Decided That One Box-Office Flop Spoke for All Female Directors|last=Brueggemann|first=Tom|date=May 17, 2020|website=IndieWire|language=en|access-date=December 9, 2022|archive-date=July 5, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220705130534/https://www.indiewire.com/2020/05/ishtar-box-office-flop-game-changer-setback-female-directors-1202231739/|url-status=live}}</ref> ], who initially lampooned the movie in '']'', said he regrets writing that cartoon because he based it solely on ''Ishtar''{{'}}s reputation, and that he enjoyed the film when he later watched it. As of December 2022, it is the only cartoon he has publicly admitted to regretting.<ref>{{cite web|last=McGuire|first=Liam|title=Gary Larson Names the One Far Side Comic He Wants to Apologize For|website=Screen Rant|date=December 1, 2022|access-date=December 9, 2022|url=https://screenrant.com/far-side-gary-larson-apologize-ishtar-mistake/|archive-date=December 9, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221209004631/https://screenrant.com/far-side-gary-larson-apologize-ishtar-mistake/|url-status=live}}</ref> Defenders argue that the studio did not back May, resulting in a ] disaster before it was released in theaters.<ref name="elainemay"/> ] compared the film to another comedy film considered the worst, '']'', and wrote that although it was considered one of the worst films ever made at the time of its release, it "has several comic moments" and does not get worse on subsequent viewings, unlike ''Gigli''.<ref name="queenan"/> | |||
=== ''Leonard Part 6'' (1987) === | |||
{{Main|Leonard Part 6{{!}}''Leonard Part 6''}} | |||
] became the first person to ] for '']'', which he admitted was the worst movie ever made.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=2512|title=Worst of 1987 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org|access-date=January 9, 2022|archive-date=January 9, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220109145300/https://siskelebert.org/?p=2512|url-status=live}}</ref>]] | |||
''Leonard Part 6'', starring (as well as written and produced by) ], was intended as a parody of spy movies. Leonard Parker, a former ] spy, is brought out of retirement to save the world from an evil vegetarian who brainwashes animals to kill people. Rita Kempley at '']'' noted the large number of Coca-Cola product placements and said "The only good thing about Bill Cosby's ''Leonard Part 6'' is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5."<ref name="wprk">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/leonardpart6pgkempley_a0ca2f.htm|title=Leonard Part 6 (PG)|last=Kempley|first=Rita|date=December 19, 1987|newspaper=]|access-date=June 27, 2012|archive-date=September 21, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921220949/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/leonardpart6pgkempley_a0ca2f.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Scott Weinberg at DVD Talk noted the film as "truly one of the worst movies you'll ever see ... movies this bad should be handled with Teflon gloves and a pair of tongs".<ref name="weinberglp6">{{cite web|url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/15632/leonard-part-6/|title=Leonard Part 6|last=Weinberg|first=Scott|date=April 26, 2005|work=DVD Talk|access-date=June 27, 2012|archive-date=November 6, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106000452/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/15632/leonard-part-6/|url-status=live}}</ref> By 1990, Dennis King of the '']'' wrote that the film had "become synonymous with 'bomb.'"<ref>{{cite news|last=King|first=Dennis|title=Ghost Dad|date=July 6, 1990|newspaper=]|url=http://www.tulsaworld.com/archives/ghost-dad/article_5b0372e5-e91b-5570-b2c7-c9edabbfae0a.html|access-date=January 27, 2019|archive-date=May 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507042016/https://www.tulsaworld.com/archives/ghost-dad/article_5b0372e5-e91b-5570-b2c7-c9edabbfae0a.html|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Total Film'' and ''Vanity Fair'' subsequently included ''Leonard Part 6'' on their respective worst film lists.<ref name=TotalFilm/><ref name="italianvanity"/> Cosby himself disowned the film, and when it was released to theaters he publicly advised people not to see it. It earned ]s for Worst Actor (Cosby), Worst Picture, and Worst Screenplay. It was also nominated for two more Razzie Awards, for Worst Supporting Actress and Worst Director.<ref name=LATimes>{{cite news|title=Leonard RIP?|newspaper=]|date=December 20, 1987|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-12-20-ca-29856-story.html|access-date=December 26, 2010|first=Pat H.|last=Broeske|archive-date=January 19, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119151239/http://articles.latimes.com/1987-12-20/entertainment/ca-29856_1_leonard-part|url-status=live}}</ref> Cosby became the first person to ],<ref name="feran">{{Cite news |last= Feran |first= Tim |title = Section: Features – Accent & Arts – Intermission | newspaper = ] |location = ] |page = 01F |date = April 26, 1992}}</ref> and said "It was the worst movie I ever made – the worst movie anyone ever made".<ref>{{cite news |title=Stars take critics with a grain of salt |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waFEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1013,2816922&dq=leonard+part+6+worst+ever&hl=en |newspaper=] |date=May 12, 1991 |access-date=April 1, 2020 |archive-date=August 16, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816054117/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=waFEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1013,2816922&dq=leonard+part+6+worst+ever&hl=en |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== ''Nukie'' (1987) === | |||
{{Main|Nukie{{!}}''Nukie''}} | |||
''Nukie'' is a 1987 South African film directed by Sias Odendaal (credited as Sias Odendal) and Michael Pakleppa, and starring ], Ronald France, and ]. The plot concerns an alien, Nukie, who crash lands on Earth and seeks help from two children to reunite with his brother, Miko, who has been captured by the United States government. The film is considered to be a knock-off of ]'s 1982 film '']''. Witney Seibold of '']'' writes that "''Nukie'' is only remarkable for how undeniably terrible it is", noting that it appears on lists of the worst films ever made.<ref name="slash">{{cite web |last=Seibold |first=Witney |title=The Nukie Controversy Explained: Destroying Crappy Movies For Charity |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/1167319/the-nukie-controversy-explained-destroying-crappy-movies-for-charity/ |website=] |access-date=January 16, 2023 |date=January 13, 2023 |archive-date=January 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230114222128/https://www.slashfilm.com/1167319/the-nukie-controversy-explained-destroying-crappy-movies-for-charity/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' note that it is "regarded as one of the worst movies ever made",<ref>{{cite web |last=Trinos |first=Angelo Delos |title=10 Copycat Films That Are Worse Than What They're Ripping Off |url=https://www.cbr.com/copycat-films-worse-than-original/ |website=] |date=15 August 2022 |access-date=11 January 2023 |archive-date=January 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111233339/https://www.cbr.com/copycat-films-worse-than-original/ |url-status=live }}</ref> with critic ] selecting ''Nukie'' as the worst film he has ever seen,<ref>{{cite web |last=Phalin |first=Mike |title=Schlock and the Snob: An Interview With Brad Jones |url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/185215/schlock-snob-interview-brad-jones/ |website=] |access-date=11 January 2023 |date=26 August 2016 |archive-date=January 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230101080206/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/185215/schlock-snob-interview-brad-jones/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and ] calling it "Possibly one of the worst films ever made."<ref>{{cite web |last=Newgent |first=Sean |title=VHS copy of forgotten 'E.T.' knock-off 'Nukie' sells for $80,600 |url=https://www.kgun9.com/entertainment/vhs-copy-of-forgotten-e-t-knock-off-nukie-sells-for-80-600 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111230814/https://www.kgun9.com/entertainment/vhs-copy-of-forgotten-e-t-knock-off-nukie-sells-for-80-600 |publisher=] |access-date=11 January 2023 |language=en |date=10 January 2023 |archive-date=11 January 2023}}</ref> ''Total Film'' write that it is considered by some to be the "most painful movie ever made";<ref name="kidsmovie"/> they listed ''Nukie'' the worst kids movie ever made and one of the worst science-fiction films ever made.<ref name="kidsmovie"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/25-worst-science-fiction-films/|title=25 Worst Science-Fiction Films|last=Winning|first=Joshua|work=]|publisher=]|date=June 30, 2014|access-date=July 8, 2017|archive-date=July 14, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170714012719/http://www.gamesradar.com/25-worst-science-fiction-films/|url-status=live}}</ref> The film's co-director, Michael Pakleppa, referred to ''Nukie'' as "the most wrong-gone thing ever done in life" and feared that the final product was "the worst film on Earth."<ref>{{cite web |last=Balmont |first=James |title=Nukie: the strange story behind the forgotten ET knock-off |url=https://www.dazeddigital.com/film-tv/article/58061/1/nukie-the-et-knock-off-film-awful-alien-vhs-interview |website=] |access-date=January 30, 2023 |language=en |date=January 30, 2023 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130102008/https://www.dazeddigital.com/film-tv/article/58061/1/nukie-the-et-knock-off-film-awful-alien-vhs-interview |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Garbage Pail Kids Movie'' (1987) === | |||
{{Main|The Garbage Pail Kids Movie{{!}}''The Garbage Pail Kids Movie''}} | |||
''The Garbage Pail Kids Movie'' is a 1987 ] adaptation of the then-popular ], itself a gross-out parody of the then-popular ] dolls co-created by ]-winning cartoonist ]. The film is often criticized for its ], nonsensical plot, poor explanations, bad acting, and the unsettling appearance of the Garbage Pail Kids (the title characters are depicted by dwarf actors in low-budget costumes, with poorly functioning mouths and expressionless faces). It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q7735810|title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie}}</ref> On ], the film holds a score of 1, making it tied for the lowest scoring film on the site.<ref name="Metacritic"/> Caryn James of '']'' said the movie is "too repulsive for children or adults of any age" and is "enough to make you believe in strict and faraway boarding schools".<ref>{{cite news |first=Caryn |last=James |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DE1D81030F931A1575BC0A961948260 |title=Movie Review – The Garbage Pail Kids Movie |newspaper=] |access-date=June 6, 2010 |date=August 28, 1987 |archive-date=February 10, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120210083257/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DE1D81030F931A1575BC0A961948260 |url-status=live }}</ref> Carlos Coto of the '']'' called it "one of the worst ever made".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1987-09-05/features/8703110946_1_garbage-pail-kids-cabbage-patch-kids-kids-show |title=Trashy 'Garbage Pail Kids' Has No Value |newspaper=] |access-date=September 29, 2010 |date=September 5, 1987 |archive-date=January 13, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113001340/http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1987-09-05/features/8703110946_1_garbage-pail-kids-cabbage-patch-kids-kids-show |url-status=dead }}</ref> Internet critic ], best known for the series '']'', stated that it was not only the worst film he had ever reviewed as the Nostalgia Critic, but the worst movie he had ever seen overall, deeming that the film served to undermine its own moral.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=4-mps8wKdhD8nWDu&v=_8Ik0xbSjSY |title=Doug Walker on The Garbage Pail Kids Movie |via=] |date=December 16, 2012 |access-date=May 17, 2024 |archive-date=May 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240517170607/https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=4-mps8wKdhD8nWDu&v=_8Ik0xbSjSY |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Much of the film's content is said to be inappropriate for children, its intended audience. Throughout the movie, the Garbage Pail Kids steal, get in fights, bite people's toes off, flatulate in people's faces, threaten others with ]s, urinate upon themselves, and run over cars. In addition to scatological behavior, the movie has several scenes that feature sexual images, violence, and drinking. Offended parents launched a nationwide protest of the movie that successfully resulted in the movie being withdrawn from circulation.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://allmovie.com/work/the-garbage-pail-kids-movie-19217 |title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie > Overview |publisher=] |access-date=June 6, 2010 |archive-date=June 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200601082028/https://www.allmovie.com/movie/the-garbage-pail-kids-movie-v19217 |url-status=live }}</ref> The shortened release contributed to the movie's poor gross of only $1,576,615.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garbagepailkids.htm |title=The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987) – Box Office Mojo |work=Box Office Mojo |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-date=March 23, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110323072054/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garbagepailkids.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> It was nominated for three Razzies at the ]: Worst Visual Effects, Worst New Star for the Garbage Pail Kids collectively, and Worst Original Song. | |||
=== ''Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2'' (1987) === | |||
{{Main|Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2{{!}}''Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2''}} | |||
''Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2'' is the sequel to the 1984 Christmas-themed ] '']'', which faced protests from parent groups and sharp criticism from '']'' hosts Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel due to its promotional campaign featuring an ax-wielding ].<ref name="flavorwiresndnp2">{{cite web |last1=Bailey |first1=Jason |title=So Bad It's Good: It's Christmas Time (and Garbage Day) in 'Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2' |url=https://www.flavorwire.com/493459/so-bad-its-good-its-christmas-time-and-garbage-day-in-silent-night-deadly-night-part-2 |website=] |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=December 12, 2014}}</ref> The film was a financial success despite the controversy, leading producers to enlist ] to repurpose its footage for a new project; however, $100,000 was eventually allocated to shoot additional original material.<ref name="sndnp2sr">{{cite web |last1=Kennedy |first1=Michael |title=Why Silent Night, Deadly Night 2 Was So Legendarily Bad |url=https://screenrant.com/silent-deadly-night-2-problems-production-bad/ |website=] |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=3 August 2022}}</ref> Nearly half of the ''Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2''{{'}}s runtime consists of flashbacks to the first film, narrated by Ricky Caldwell (Eric Freeman), the brother of the original film's protagonist, as he recounts events before embarking on his own murderous rampage.<ref name="sndnp2sr"/> | |||
Much of the film's reception and legacy centers on Freeman's performance, which ''Flavorwire'' states "may very well be the single worst performance ever committed to celluloid,"<ref name="flavorwiresndnp2" /> and Nathan Rabin states: "I'm not sure whether Freeman gives the worst performance of all time or the best here but it is one of the most unique starring turns in the history of film."<ref name="rabinsndnp2">{{cite web |last1=Rabin |first1=Nathan |authorlink=Nathan Rabin |title=Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is One of the Craziest, Sleaziest and Most Deranged Pieces of Shit I've Ever Seen. That's Why It's Great and Everyone Should See It |url=https://nathanrabin.substack.com/p/silent-night-deadly-night-part-2 |website=Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas |access-date=December 14, 2024 |date=30 November 2023}}</ref> A scene in which Ricky shouts "garbage day!" before shooting and killing a bystander taking out his trash became an ] after being uploaded to ] in its early years.<ref name="flavorwiresndnp2" /> ''Screen Rant'' has since deemed the film to be "a masterpiece of the so bad it's good variety,"<ref name="sndnp2sr" /> and "one of the worst movies ever made."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gunning |first1=Cathal |title=Every Killer Santa Horror Movie Ranked |url=https://screenrant.com/killer-santa-horror-movies-ranked-worst-best/ |website=] |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date=25 December 2022}}</ref> Meanwhile, Rabin stated it was "the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That’s why it’s great and every one should see it."<ref>{{cite tweet|author=Nathan Rabin|user=nathanrabin|author-link=Nathan Rabin|number=1728430127728738339|title=Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 is the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That's why it's great and every one should see it.|date=November 25, 2023|access-date=December 15, 2024}}</ref><ref name="rabinsndnp2"/> Emmett O'Regan of '']'' also selected it as the worst movie ever made,<ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Regan |first1=Emmett |title=Why Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is the Worst Movie of All Time |url=https://www.cbr.com/silent-night-deadly-night-worst-movie-all-time/ |website=] |access-date=December 14, 2024 |language=en |date= December 11, 2022}}</ref> and an article in '']'' asserted that: "in terms of filmmaking quality—it’s hard to believe that in terms of pure, unadulterated crap, anything could ever surpass it."<ref name="20pastechristmas"/> Additionally, ''Flavorwire'', '']'', and ''Paste'' have all listed it as the worst Christmas film ever made.<ref name="flavorwiresndnp2" /><ref>{{cite web |last1=Donato |first1=Matt |title='Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2' Is The Best Worst Christmas Horror Movie And You Must Watch It |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/555210/silent-night-deadly-night-part-2/ |website=] |access-date=December 15, 2024 |date=December 22, 2017}}</ref><ref name="20pastechristmas">{{cite web |last1=Vorel |first1=Jim |title=The 20 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/christmas/the-20-worst-christmas-movies-of-all-time |website=] |access-date=December 14, 2024}}</ref> ''Time Out'' and ''Flavorwire'' later included it on their respective lists of the worst films ever made.<ref name="timeoutlist"/><ref name="Flavorwire"/> | |||
=== ''Hobgoblins'' (1988) === | |||
{{Main|Hobgoblins (film){{!}}''Hobgoblins'' (film)}} | |||
''Hobgoblins'', by ], is widely considered a low-budget ] that capitalizes on the popularity of the 1984 film ''].''<ref name="hobstandard"/> It gained popularity in 1998 after being featured on an episode of ''Mystery Science Theater 3000''. ''MST3K'' writer ] later commented on ''Hobgoblins'', saying, "Oh, man. You have no idea the torture it was to watch this movie several times in the space of a week. It shoots right to the top of the list of the worst movies we've ever done." Specific points of the film that were lampooned were the extreme misogyny and atrocious treatment of women; the film's technical incompetence and repetitive scenes; its asinine, poorly conceived plot; its dreadful acting; and its ugly look and gratuitous vulgarity, particularly in regards to its characters and subject matter.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0907.htm |title=Episode Guide|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013042500/http://www.castleforrester.com/media/guide/0907.htm |archive-date=October 13, 2008 }}</ref> David Cornelius of DVD Talk stated, "There's not one aspect of this movie that isn't the Worst Thing Ever."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/38236/mad-monster-rally/ |title=Mad Monster Rally : DVD Talk Review of the DVD Video |publisher=]|access-date=March 5, 2014|last=Cornelius |first=David|date=August 18, 2009 |archive-date=February 24, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140224044732/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/38236/mad-monster-rally/ |url-status=live }}</ref> '']''{{'}}s ''Bad Horror Club'' noted its status as one of the worst films of all time, commenting: "it’s so preposterously badly made, terribly acted and ineptly constructed that it makes for some of the most fun you can ever have watching a movie."<ref name="hobstandard">{{cite web |last1=Embley |first1=Jochan |last2=Fletcher |first2=Harry |title=Remembering 80s disaster Hobgoblins in all its chaotic glory |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/bad-horror-club-hobgoblins-80s-disaster-a4422426.html |website=] |access-date=December 8, 2024 |language=en |date=April 23, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Sloane has embraced ''Hobgoblins''{{'}} status as one of the worst films of all time, stating that he fears that it will be forgotten if it is removed from IMDb's user-generated bottom 100 list.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/12169/rick-sloane-talks-hobgoblins/|title=Rick Sloane Talks Hobgoblins|author=Foywonder|date=June 23, 2009|website=]|language=en|access-date=December 8, 2024}}</ref> After seeing the ''MST3K'' episode himself, Sloane was inspired to direct ], which was released in 2009.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/films/hobgoblins-2|title=Hobgoblins 2|via=]|access-date=May 10, 2020|archive-date=September 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927043012/https://mubi.com/films/hobgoblins-2|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition to IMDb,<ref name="hobstandard"/> it has been featured on lists from ''Flavorwire'' and ''Total Film''.<ref name="Flavorwire"/><ref name=TotalFilm/> | |||
=== ''Mac and Me'' (1988) === | |||
{{Main|Mac and Me{{!}}''Mac and Me''}} | |||
''Mac and Me'' is about a young boy in a wheelchair who meets and befriends an alien who has crash-landed on Earth. A box-office failure,<ref>{{cite news|title=Advertising is so much a part of life that it's understandable to find familiar products in films. But sometimes it goes too far.|work=]|date=August 29, 1999|url=https://articles.latimes.com/1999/aug/29/entertainment/ca-4591/3|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204041237/http://articles.latimes.com/1999/aug/29/entertainment/ca-4591/3|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 4, 2013|access-date=May 17, 2012}}</ref> the film grossed $6,424,112 in the United States<ref>{{mojo title|macandme|Mac and Me}}</ref> on a $13 million budget.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/MovieDetails/58827|title=Mac and Me|website=]|access-date=April 27, 2018|archive-date=April 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428093913/https://catalog.afi.com/Catalog/MovieDetails/58827|url-status=live}}</ref> It used to have a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, whose critical consensus notes that it is "duly infamous" as both an imitation of '']'' (1982), and a marketing vehicle for ] and ]<ref name="rottentomatoes1">{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q1761515|title=Mac and Me}}</ref> (the filmmakers had admitted a profit-sharing arrangement with the former).<ref>{{cite news|title= Movie Review Mac and Me Takes a Big McBite Out of E.T.|newspaper= ]|url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-08-15-ca-300-story.html|access-date= December 5, 2010|archive-date= March 7, 2011|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110307085307/http://articles.latimes.com/1988-08-15/entertainment/ca-300_1_big-mac|url-status= live}}</ref> ] described the film as being "more like a TV commercial than a movie",<ref name="Maltin01211"/> and Marjorie Baumgarten of the '']'' called it a "shameless ''E.T.'' knockoff".<ref name="rottentomatoes1"/> ''Mac and Me'' is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/movies-with-bizarre-weird-source-material/|title=15 Movies With Bizarre Source Material|last=McGranaghan|first=Mike|date=March 21, 2017|website=]|access-date=June 23, 2018|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624035654/https://screenrant.com/movies-with-bizarre-weird-source-material/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://movieweb.com/mac-and-me-movie-alternate-ending-video/|title=Alternate Mac and Me Ending Unearthed and It's Insane|last=Millican|first=Josh|date=August 8, 2018|work=]|access-date=December 15, 2018|archive-date=September 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911081746/https://movieweb.com/mac-and-me-movie-alternate-ending-video/|url-status=live}}</ref> with '']'' reporting that it is "frequently pulled out in 'worst film of all time' arguments".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/18/top-aliens-in-the-movies/mac-and-me/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/07/18/top-aliens-in-the-movies/mac-and-me/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Top 20 aliens in the movies|date=December 19, 2017|website=]|access-date=April 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Filmmaker ] (responsible for the 2004 Oscar-nominated '']'') declared it the "worst thing you'll ever see in your entire life", as well as the most egregious example of ] in cinema history.<ref name="crow">{{cite news|url=https://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/morgan-spurlock-dubs-mac-worst-movie-ever-sold-060910653.html|date=April 22, 2011|last=Crow|first=Jonathan|work=]|access-date=August 29, 2013|title=Morgan Spurlock Dubs 'Mac and Me' the Worst Film Ever Sold|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120405070102/http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/morgan-spurlock-dubs-mac-worst-movie-ever-sold-060910653.html|archive-date=April 5, 2012}}</ref> The film was also named the worst ever in the '']'',<ref>{{cite news|date=January 22, 2017|title=Mac and Me|newspaper=]|quote=McDonald's created an 'E.T.' rip-off called 'Mac and Me' in 1988... It's the worst movie ever made.}}</ref> as well as by broadcaster ]<ref name="mayo">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03slrls|title=Paul Rudd and Chris Evans interviewed by Simon Mayo|date=April 29, 2016|publisher=]|access-date=April 27, 2018|time=10 minutes|quote=''Mac and Me''... we're talking about the worst film ever made.|archive-date=May 10, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180510202715/https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03slrls|url-status=live}}</ref> and writer/producer ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gq.com/story/damon-lindelof-paul-alien-comedy|title=Damon Lindelof's Open Letter to Paul the Alien|last=Lindelof|first=Damon|author-link=Damon Lindelof|date=March 14, 2011|website=]|access-date=April 27, 2018|archive-date=April 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180428093747/https://www.gq.com/story/damon-lindelof-paul-alien-comedy|url-status=live}}</ref> Michael Hayden of '']'' referred to it as "hands down the worst family movie in Hollywood history".<ref name="gqindia">{{cite web|url=https://www.gqindia.com/content/6-best-bad-films/#s-cust0|title=The 6 best bad films|last=Hayden|first=Michael|date=November 10, 2011|website=]|access-date=May 11, 2018|archive-date=May 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180512044317/https://www.gqindia.com/content/6-best-bad-films/#s-cust0|url-status=live}}</ref> The film was nominated for four Razzie Awards including Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and won two trophies: Worst Director for ] (tied with ] for '']'') and Worst New Star for ] in a cameo. ''Mac and Me'' has however ] and was featured on the second season of the '']'' revival (the only Razzie-winning film ever to be riffed in the history of the show).<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/mcdonalds-mac-and-me-paul-rudd-movie-et-spinoff|title=How McDonald's Bizarre 'E.T.' Knockoff Got Made|last=Patches|first=Matt|date=April 3, 2017|publisher=]|access-date=December 11, 2017|archive-date=December 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211213637/https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/mcdonalds-mac-and-me-paul-rudd-movie-et-spinoff|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://nerdist.com/mac-and-me-bottleneck-gallery-figure-pins/|title=Mac and Me Finally (?) Gets Figure and Pin Collection|last=McNally|first=Victoria|date=April 24, 2017|publisher=]|access-date=May 11, 2018|archive-date=May 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180512044315/https://nerdist.com/mac-and-me-bottleneck-gallery-figure-pins/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://uproxx.com/tv/mystery-science-theater-3000-mac-and-me-season-2/|title='Mystery Science Theater 3000' Will Tackle 'Mac And Me' In Season 2|date=November 12, 2018|access-date=January 3, 2020|archive-date=January 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200103134816/https://uproxx.com/tv/mystery-science-theater-3000-mac-and-me-season-2/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbr.com/mst3k-movies-good-without-the-riffing/|title=10 MST3K Movies You Should Watch Without The Riffing|first=Derek|last=Faraci|date=June 12, 2022|website=CBR|access-date=February 12, 2023|archive-date=February 12, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212014327/https://www.cbr.com/mst3k-movies-good-without-the-riffing/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Things'' (1989) === | |||
{{Main|Things (film){{!}}''Things'' (film)}} | |||
''Things'', a 1989 Canadian ], ], horror ], was written and produced by Andrew Jordan & Barry J. Gillis. It cost approximately $35,000 in total to make<ref name="CANUX">{{cite web|url=http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/things.html|title=''Things'' review|publisher=Canuxploitation|access-date=December 28, 2013|archive-date=September 29, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929234728/http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/things.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and marked the mainstream film debut of ] ]. It was ostensibly made as ] to horror icons and films, such as ] and his '']'' franchise.<ref name="CO1">{{cite web|url=http://www.critcononline.com/films_on_the_fringe.htm|title=Films on the Fringe: Things (1989)|publisher=Critic Online|access-date=June 7, 2009|archive-date=April 15, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415201758/http://www.critcononline.com/films_on_the_fringe.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Adam Symchuk of ''Screen Rant'' writes: "While films like '']'' and '']'' seem to be constant contenders for the best 'so bad it's good' movie, is the true unheralded champion among many ]."<ref>{{cite web |title=It Came From The North: 10 Great Monster Movies From Canada |url=https://screenrant.com/great-monster-movies-from-canada/ |website=] |last=Symchuk |first=Adam |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=September 30, 2020 |archive-date=July 26, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726091201/https://screenrant.com/great-monster-movies-from-canada/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Likewise, Jeff Kirschner of ] nominated it as the worst movie ever made and ] opined that "It's so terrible I can't think of another movie that even comes close."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/142337/things-worst-movie-ever-made/|title=Things: The Worst Movie Ever Made|date=December 10, 2015|publisher=]|last=Kirschner|first=Jeff|access-date=July 26, 2022|archive-date=December 4, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221204173115/https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/142337/things-worst-movie-ever-made/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Pfeifer |first=Will |author-link=Will Pfeifer |title=Will Pfeifer: Monsters, mullets meet for snoozefest |url=https://www.jacksonnewspapers.com/x1348677046/Will-Pfeifer-Monsters-mullets-meet-for-snoozefest |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210902063835/https://www.jacksonnewspapers.com/x1348677046/Will-Pfeifer-Monsters-mullets-meet-for-snoozefest |newspaper=] |access-date=July 26, 2022 |date=October 17, 2008 |archive-date=September 2, 2021 |language=en}}</ref> In 2022, RiffTrax concluded that ''Things'' was the worst movie that they had ever spoofed.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Nelson |first1=Mike J. |author-link1=Michael J. Nelson |last2=Murphy |first2=Kevin |author-link2=Kevin Murphy (actor) |last3=Corbett |first3=Bill |author-link3=Bill Corbett |title=Things |url=https://www.rifftrax.com/things |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220305141159/https://www.rifftrax.com/things |publisher=] |archive-date=March 5, 2022 |access-date=July 26, 2022 |language=en |date=March 4, 2022}}</ref> | |||
== 1990s == | |||
=== ''Troll 2'' (1990) === | |||
{{Main|Troll 2{{!}}''Troll 2''}} | |||
Despite its title, ''Troll 2'' does not feature any trolls (the antagonists are actually ]s) and has no relation to the ]. ''Troll 2'' was produced under the title ''"Goblins"'', but the title was changed by American distributors.<ref name="GriggsTroll" /> In the film, an American family vacations to the town of Nilbog (goblin spelled backwards), where vegetarian goblins attempt to turn the family into edible plants.<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies"/> It was shot in ] and the cast was composed of local amateur actors. A ] developed between the cast and the Italian crew, led by director ], who had translated the script to English.<ref name="GriggsTroll">{{cite web |last1=Griggs |first1=Brandon |title=Troll 2: As camp as it gets |url=https://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/arts/ci_5457861 |website=] |date=March 17, 2007 |access-date=December 30, 2024}}</ref> The bad acting and dialogue have become notorious for their ] value,<ref name="GriggsTroll" /> with individual scenes having become Internet memes.<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies"/><ref name="collidertroll">{{cite web |last1=Berchtold |first1=Trent |title=The 10 Most Rewatchable Bad Horror Movies, Ranked |url=https://collider.com/bad-horror-movies-rewatchable-ranked/ |website=] |access-date=December 30, 2024 |language=en |date=September 29, 2024}}</ref> In 2009, ], the child star of ''Troll 2'', released '']'', a documentary exploring the film's tumultuous production and its unexpected cult following.<ref name="trollbestworst"/> | |||
] reports that it is "known as the worst movie of all time"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105420828 |title=The Beauty Of The 'Best Worst Movie' |publisher=] |access-date=June 15, 2009 |archive-date=June 20, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090620200356/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105420828 |url-status=live }}</ref> while '']'' calls it "a popular candidate for the worst film ever made".<ref name="trollbestworst">{{cite web |url=https://avclub.com/article/ibest-worst-movie-iuncovers-the-heartbreaking-psyc-95807 |title=Best Worst Movie uncovers the heartbreaking psychodrama in a memorably insane B-movie |work=] |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |date=March 29, 2013 |access-date=March 29, 2013 |archive-date=May 16, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140516063721/http://www.avclub.com/article/ibest-worst-movie-iuncovers-the-heartbreaking-psyc-95807 |url-status=live }}</ref> Likewise, '']'' proclaimed that "''Troll 2'' is really as bad as they come,"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tvguide.com/movies/troll-2/review/129231 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170426044557/http://www.tvguide.com/movies/troll-2/review/129231/ |title=Troll 2 Review |work=] |archive-date=April 26, 2017 |access-date=March 5, 2014}}</ref> and Ken Hanke of '']'' stated in his review that: "There are movies that are bad. There are movies that are so-bad-they're-good. And then there's ''Troll 2''—a movie that's so bad that it defies comprehension."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mountainx.com/movies/review/troll_2 |title=Movie Review: Troll 2 |work=] |last=Hanke |first=Ken |date=July 23, 2008 |access-date=March 5, 2014 |archive-date=October 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019171306/http://www.mountainx.com/movies/review/troll_2 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Troll 2'' regularly appears on lists of films considered the worst, including: ''Flavorwire'',<ref name="Flavorwire"/> '']'',<ref name="fotogramas"/> ''IGN'',<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies"/> Rotten Tomatoes,<ref name="sobad"/> ''Screen Rant'',<ref name="Screen Rant"/> and ''Time Out''.<ref name="timeoutlist"/> Furthermore, '']'' named it the most rewatchable bad movie of all time.<ref name="collidertroll" /> | |||
=== ''Highlander II: The Quickening'' (theatrical version, 1991) === | |||
{{Main|Highlander II: The Quickening{{!}}''Highlander II: The Quickening''}} | |||
The French-British film ''Highlander II: The Quickening'' is a sequel to the 1986 cult film ''],'' which transitions the ] of the original film into ], and ] the mystical warriors of the first film into ]. It received a harsh reception from both critics and audiences, as it has a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes and appears on its 100 Worst Movies of All Time.<ref name="rt100worst"/> Common criticisms included the lack of motivation for the characters, blatant disregard for backstory from the first film (such as the new and seemingly incongruent origin for the Immortals and the unexplained resurrection of Ramírez), glaring plot holes, a messy and nonsensical story structure, the filmmaker's inability to balance unrelated plots and subplots, and obvious contradictions in the film's internal logic.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/16/highlander-2-renegade-version|title=Highlander 2: Renegade Version|author=I. G. N. Staff|date=June 16, 2000|website=IGN}}</ref> In selecting it as the worst movie sequel of all time, ] also wrote that "it is typically considered one of the worst films of all time."<ref>{{cite web |last=Williams |first=Isaac |title=The 10 Worst Movie Sequels Ever, Ranked |url=https://www.cbr.com/worst-movie-sequels-ever/ |publisher=] |access-date=January 11, 2022 |date=January 5, 2022}}</ref> Roger Ebert named it the worst film of 1991, stating: "If there is a planet somewhere whose civilization is based on the worst movies of all time, ''Highlander 2: The Quickening'' deserves a sacred place among their most treasured artifacts."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/highlander-2-the-quickening-1991 |title=Highlander 2: The Quickening movie review (1991) |first=Roger |last=Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert |journal=Chicago Sun-Times |date=November 1, 1991 |access-date=October 10, 2020}}</ref> An ] review said: "How bad is this movie? Well, imagine if ] were alive today, and someone gave him a multi-million dollar budget. See his imagination running rampant, bringing in aliens from outer space with immensely powerful firearms, immortals who bring each other back to life by calling out their names, epic duels on flying skateboards, and a blatant disregard for anything logical or previously established—now you are starting to get closer to the vision of ''Highlander II''."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/16/highlander-2-renegade-version |title=Highlander 2: Renegade Version Review |work=IGN |date=June 16, 2000}}</ref> ''Screen Rant'' has since included it on its list of the 25 worst films of all time.<ref name="Screen Rant"/> | |||
In 1995, the film's director ] made a ] version known as ''Highlander 2: Renegade Version'' and then later released another version simply known as ''Highlander 2: The Special Edition'' for its 2004 DVD release. The film was reconstructed on both occasions largely from existing material, with certain scenes removed and others added back in, and the entire sequence of events changed. The reconstructed film's reception was far better than the original's; it was elevated to a mixed reception.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://joblo.com/horror-movies/news/highlander-ii-there-can-be-only-four-cuts---part-2|title = Highlander II: There can be only four cuts!| work = JoBlo Movie Network|date = November 24, 2010|access-date = March 16, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Super Mario Bros.'' (1993) === | |||
{{main|Super Mario Bros. (film){{!}}''Super Mario Bros.'' (film)}} | |||
] (pictured in 2006) described ''Super Mario Bros.'' as "the worst thing I ever did" later in his life.]] | |||
The first ] live-action film based on a video game, ''Super Mario Bros.'' was directed by the husband-and-wife team of ] and ] (known for their work on '']''). It follows the brothers ] (]) and ] (]), plumbers who venture into a parallel universe to rescue ] (]) from the villainous ] (]). The '']'' series' publisher, ], believed the ] was strong enough for experimentation and gave the filmmakers free creative license.<ref name="Wired: MarioSucked">{{cite magazine |last=Russell |first=Jamie |title=Why the Super Mario Movie Sucked |url=https://www.wired.com/2012/04/generation-xbox-super-mario-movie/ |magazine=] |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=April 23, 2012}}</ref> The finished film bears little resemblance to the games,<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies">{{cite web |last=Bibbiani |first=William |title=The Best Worst Movies Ever Made: The Room, Super Mario Bros. and More |url=https://sea.ign.com/breakin-2-electric-boogaloo/180321/feature/the-best-worst-movies-ever-made-the-room-super-mario-bros-and-more |website=] |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=December 27, 2021}}</ref> trading their colorful ] for a ] world populated by humanoid dinosaurs.<ref name="Wired: MarioSucked"/><ref name="RiffTrax: Mario"/> '']'' wrote: "Some movies are so bad that they're secretly good. ''Super Mario Bros.'' is so bad it crushes your spirit. It's unfathomably terrible."<ref name="SyFy: Mario">{{cite web |last=Grierson |first=Tim |title=This week in genre history: Super Mario Bros. the movie gets an instant 'game over' |url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/super-mario-bros-movie-genre-history |website=] |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=May 26, 2020}}</ref> The film was criticized for its inconsistent tone, complex narrative, and lack of faithfulness to the source material.<ref>{{Cite AV media |last1=Siskel |first1=Gene |last2=Ebert |first2=Roger |date=August 18, 2008 |title=Siskel & Ebert Review "Super Mario Bros." |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEH66qiwrY |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160810150516/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEH66qiwrY |archive-date=August 10, 2016 |access-date=November 28, 2016 |via=YouTube}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Walsh |first=Michael |title=8 Things Fans Want To See In The Super Mario Movie |url=https://collider.com/things-fans-want-super-mario-movie/ |website=] |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=June 22, 2022}}</ref> According to '']'', ''Super Mario Bros.'' is a mainstay on lists compiling the worst films of all time.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Shanfield |first1=Ethan |title=Mario Powers Up: How Nintendo Visionary Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination's Chris Meledandri Plan to Super Smash Hollywood |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/features/super-mario-bros-movie-shigeru-miyamoto-interview-1235572488/ |website=] |access-date=March 21, 2024 |date=April 4, 2023}}</ref> It was voted the sixth worst film of all time by ] in 2012,<ref name="RiffTrax: Mario">{{cite web |title=Worst Movies of All Time Top 10 |url=https://www.rifftrax.com/worst-movies-of-all-time-top-10 |publisher=] |access-date=July 9, 2022 |date=2012}}</ref> and '']'' ranked it among the "best worst movies ever made" in 2021.<ref name="IGN: BestWorstMovies"/> Author ], in his 2020 book ''The Art of Fairness'', called ''Super Mario Bros.'' "the worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite book |last=Bodanis |first=David |title=The Art of Fairness: The Power of Decency in a World Turned Mean |date=November 2020 |publisher=] |isbn=9781647003869 |chapter=Directors |quote=The result was ''1941'', and while it's not the worst movie ever made—not when ''Super Mario Bros.'' is still available—it's definitely a contender.}}</ref> | |||
In addition to scathing reviews, ''Super Mario Bros.'' was a ], and Morton and Jankel were "]" as directors in Hollywood.<ref name="SyFy: Mario"/> In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said: "The worst thing I ever did? ''Super Mario Bros.'' It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hattenstone |first=Simon |date=August 3, 2007 |title=The Method? Living it out? Cobblers! |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/aug/03/2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161216193111/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/aug/03/2 |archive-date=December 16, 2016 |access-date=December 13, 2016 |website=]}}</ref> In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was ''Super Mario Bros.''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Greenstreet |first=Rosanna |date=June 17, 2011 |title=Q&A: Bob Hoskins |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/18/bob-hoskins-interview-neverland |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110021801/http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/jun/18/bob-hoskins-interview-neverland |archive-date=November 10, 2013 |access-date=December 13, 2016 |website=]}}</ref> The film made Nintendo wary of licensing its works to film studios,<ref name="Sony">{{cite news|last=Vary|first=Adam|title=Sony Pictures Lands "Mario Bros." Movie Rights From Nintendo, Leaked Emails Show|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/sony-nintendo-mario-bros-movie#.duwkpjZgV|access-date=December 11, 2014|website=]|date=December 11, 2014|archive-date=December 12, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141212093710/http://www.buzzfeed.com/adambvary/sony-nintendo-mario-bros-movie#.duwkpjZgV|url-status=live}}</ref> and it did not license ''Mario'' again until it collaborated with ] for '']'' (2023).<ref name="SyFy: Mario"/><ref name="terrible10"/> ], who voiced ] in the 2023 film, called ''Super Mario Bros.'' one of the worst films ever made and what "made me realize that movies, like, could be bad. That never occurred to me until that moment."<ref>{{cite web |last=Malkin |first=Marc |title='Super Mario Bros. Movie' Star Seth Rogen Calls Original 1993 Adaptation 'One of the Worst Films Ever Made' |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/columns/super-mario-bros-seth-rogen-slams-original-movie-1235574029/ |website=] |access-date=March 21, 2024 |date=April 5, 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== ''North'' (1994) === | |||
{{Main|North (1994 film){{!}}''North'' (1994 film)}} | |||
] made the ] '']'' (1994), which was panned by critics to the point that ] famously declared he "hated, hated, hated this movie" on the ] show '']''.]] | |||
The ] film '']'' is an adaptation of the novel ''North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents'' by ], who also wrote the screenplay and has a minor role in the film. ''North'', which stars ] in the title role and also marked ]'s film debut, was a critical and commercial failure, earning only $7,138,449 worldwide despite its budget of over $40 million. It was widely criticized for its plot, its all-star cast of insensitive characters, lack of humor and portrayal of numerous ethnic stereotypes (especially Alaskan Inuit). It has a 14% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{cite web |title=North Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes |work=Rotten Tomatoes |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/north/ |access-date=March 7, 2011}}</ref> Roger Ebert gave it zero stars and, in his review, infamously wrote, "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=493|title=Worst of 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=5388|title=The Client, Lassie, It Could Happen to You, North, Barcelona, 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews|website=siskelebert.org}}</ref> He continued saying "''North'' is a bad film – one of the worst movies ever made",<ref name="northebert"/> and it is also on his list of most hated films.<ref name="eberthated"/> Both Ebert and ] named ''North'' as the worst film of 1994.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Official Site of Gene Siskel |work=Cmgww.com |url=http://www.cmgww.com/stars/siskel/screening_room/thumbs_down.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090226070236/http://www.cmgww.com/stars/siskel/screening_room/thumbs_down.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 26, 2009 |access-date=March 7, 2011}}</ref> ] of the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' said in his review that "''North'' is director Rob Reiner's first flat-out failure, a sincerely wrought, energetically made picture that all the same crashes on takeoff. It's strange and oddly distasteful, at its best managing to be bad in some original and unexpected ways."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1995/01/06/dd59113.dtl |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031113141403/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F1995%2F01%2F06%2Fdd59113.dtl |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 13, 2003 |work=The San Francisco Chronicle |title=Rob Reiner's 'North' Is Distastefully Bad |last=LaSalle |first=Mick |author-link=Mick LaSalle |date=January 8, 2011}}</ref> ] named ''North'' as one of the 40 worst movies he has ever seen, saying that, "Of all the films on this list, ''North'' may be the most difficult to watch from start to finish."<ref name="RichardRoeper"/> The film was nominated for the following awards at the ]: Worst Picture, Worst Actor (], also for '']''), Worst Supporting Actress (]), Worst Supporting Actor (], also for '']''), Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay (] and ]). | |||
=== ''Dis – en historie om kjærlighet'' (''A Story About Love'') (1995) === | |||
{{Main|A Story About Love{{!}}''A Story About Love''}} | |||
The Norwegian ] ''Dis – en historie om kjærlighet'' was directed by Aune Sand. The film follows different couples and their love stories around the world, in ], ], ] and ]. ''Dis'' received universally poor reviews by critics, and has been called the most poorly reviewed Norwegian film in history.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Kristoffersen|first=Marius Vartdal|title=Hva Var I Veien Med Dis?|url=http://znett.com/2011/05/hva-var-i-veien-med-dis/|date=May 3, 2011|access-date=July 14, 2014|magazine=]|language=no}}</ref><ref name="osloby.no"/> Critic Harald Kolstad of '']'' gave it a score of zero, refused to acknowledge ''Dis'' as a film, and claimed to have never seen anything worse.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pedersen |first=Brent Erik |title=Hedrer Dagsavisens kritiker |url=http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/hedrer-dagsavisens-kritiker/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140617125554/http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/hedrer-dagsavisens-kritiker/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 17, 2014 |access-date=July 14, 2014 |newspaper=Dagsavisen|language=no }}</ref> '']'' referred to the film as "the largest turkey" and "the most reviled film",<ref name="osloby.no">{{cite news|title=Norges største kalkun flyr igjen|url=http://www.osloby.no/article199599_2.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120814005215/http://www.osloby.no/article199599_2.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=August 14, 2012|date=June 28, 2012|access-date=July 14, 2014|newspaper=Aftenposten|language=no}}</ref> and ''Total Film'' included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.<ref name="TotalFilm"/> Despite being a critical disaster it became a commercial success, gaining ] status with a following akin to '']'', with fans embracing its "so bad it's good" qualities.<ref name="osloby.no"/> Director Aune Sand insists that ''Dis'' is a masterpiece.<ref>{{cite news|title= Slakter norsk film|url=http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2005/07/20/437937.html|access-date=July 14, 2014|newspaper=Dagbladet|language=no}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Showgirls'' (1995) === | |||
{{Main|Showgirls{{!}}''Showgirls''}} | |||
], whose '']''<ref name="2024lineup"/> earned a record 13 ] nominations, was the first person to attend the ceremony and ].<ref>{{Cite news |last= Persall |first= Steve |title = 'Showgirls' gets razzed | newspaper = ] |page = 2B |date = March 25, 1996}}</ref>]] | |||
Hype for ]'s ] ] ''Showgirls'' focused on the sex and nudity in this ] French-American film with a $45 million budget, but the final result was critically derided. Much hype revolved around the film's star, ], who only two years before had starred in the lighthearted and chaste teen ] '']''. The film won seven ], a record at that time, and received 13 nominations, a record that still stands. It received an additional award at the ], where it was awarded Worst Picture of the Decade. Kenneth Turan of the '']'' called it, "a film of thunderous oafishness that gives adult subject matter the kind of bad name it does not need or deserve".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/showgirls/reviews/#page=2&sort=source |title=Showgirls – Movie Reviews |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=March 5, 2014}}</ref> Michael Dequina of TheMovieReport.com also criticized the film, claiming that it was "the best bad filmmaking Hollywood has to offer".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://themoviereport.com/movierpt1.html#showgirls |title=The Movie Report Archive, Volume 1 |work=TheMovieReport.com |access-date=November 18, 2013}}</ref> Adam White wrote in '']'' that it was "the worst movie ever made" but also a masterpiece.<ref name="showgirlsindy">{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/showgirls-elizabeth-berkley-paul-verhoeven-you-dont-nomi-documentary-a9407086.html |title=Showgirls: The remarkable resurrection of the worst movie ever made |work=]|last=White|first=Adam|date=March 18, 2020|access-date=April 17, 2020}}</ref> Stephen Lynch of the '']'' similarly named it the worst movie ever made, calling it "so bad it may be brilliant".<ref>{{cite news |title=Critic picks worst movies of all time |first=Stephen|last=Lynch|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=398&dat=20011003&id=oGhOAAAAIBAJ&pg=6912,5443994|newspaper=Bartow Press |date=October 3, 2001 |access-date=June 12, 2014}}</ref> Various sources have since included ''Showgirls'' in their respective lists of the worst films ever made, including: Rotten Tomatoes, ''Empire'', ''Screen Rant'', ''Vanity Fair'', and ''Flavorwire''.<ref name="Flavorwire"/><ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="italianvanity"/><ref name="sobad"/><ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> ''Showgirls'' was also featured in Michael Sauter's ''The Worst Movies of All Time'' as well as ''The Official Razzie Movie Guide''. Despite being a critical failure and failing at the box office initially, ''Showgirls'' found success as a ] ], particularly among the ], but whether the film was intended to be satirical remains subject to debate.<ref name="showgirlsindy"/> On the ] market, the film was ]'s most profitable release for years.<ref name="showgirlsindy"/> | |||
=== ''The Scarlet Letter'' (1995) === | |||
{{Main|The Scarlet Letter (1995 film){{!}}''The Scarlet Letter'' (1995 film)}} | |||
A "freely adapted" version of the ] by ], directed by ] and starring ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/os-xpm-1995-10-13-9510110375-story.html|title='Scarlet Letter' is Untrue to the Hawthorne Tale|last=Boyar|first=Jay|date=October 13, 1995|website=]|access-date=November 1, 2020}}</ref> The film met with universally negative reviews<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deseretnews.com/top/705/7/The-Scarlet-Letter-20-best-selling-books-that-werent-as-acclaimed-as-film-adaptations.html|title=20 best-selling books that weren't as acclaimed as film adaptations|last=Purdy|first=Alicia|date=May 26, 2012|website=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131213092221/https://www.deseretnews.com/top/705/7/The-Scarlet-Letter-20-best-selling-books-that-werent-as-acclaimed-as-film-adaptations.html|access-date=September 26, 2018|archive-date=December 13, 2013}}</ref> and was a ], grossing $10.4 million against a production budget of $46 million.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Scarlet Letter (1995)|url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=scarletletter.htm|website=]|access-date=November 12, 2020}}</ref> Multiple critics named the film the worst of 1995.<ref name="hicks">{{cite web|url=https://www.deseret.com/1995/12/22/19211366/best-worst-movies-of-1995|title=Best & Worst Movies of 1995|last=Hicks|first=Chris|date=December 22, 1995|website=]|access-date=November 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/So-Bad-You-Can-t-Hate-Them-Demi-Moore-s-3017177.php|title=So Bad You Can't Hate Them|last=LaSalle|first=Mick|author-link=Mick LaSalle|date=December 30, 1995|website=]|access-date=November 6, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/worst-film/BestOf?oid=10515293|title=Worst Film 1995|website=]|access-date=November 6, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Chris Hicks of the '']'' argued that its deviation from the source material represents "Hollywood's arrogance in its purest form".<ref name="hicks"/> '']''{{'}}s Amy E. Schwartz reported that the "nutty" film was described by numerous reviewers as the worst they had ever seen.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1995/10/24/even-hawthorne-would-have-laughed/765e3169-7ffb-4b1f-934d-5b2c3c1468f5/|title=Even Hawthorne Would Have Laughed|last=Schwartz|first=Amy E|date=October 24, 1995|newspaper=]|access-date=November 1, 2020}}</ref> Kevin Williamson of '']'' observed a "combination of awfulness and inexplicability", and claimed that "any objective and authoritative analysis will reveal that the worst film ever made is Demi Moore's version of ''The Scarlet Letter''".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/i-hate-disagree-my-betters-kevin-d-williamson/|title=I Hate to Disagree with My Betters...|last=Williamson|first=Kevin|date=February 19, 2009|website=]|access-date=November 1, 2020}}</ref> Sadie Trombetta of '']'' wrote that it "has earned an almost permanent spot on every 'Worst Movie of All Time' list",<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bustle.com/articles/121305-9-books-that-should-never-have-been-made-into-movies|title=9 Books That Should Never Have Been Movies|last=Trombetta|first=Sadie|date=November 5, 2015|website=]|access-date=November 1, 2020}}</ref> while author ] noted that it is "widely cited as the worst film adaptation ever made".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.libbyhellmann.com/5-great-books-movie-stinkers/|title=5 Great Books That Were Movie Stinkers|last=Hellmann|first=Libby Fischer|author-link=Libby Fischer Hellmann|date=August 7, 2016|website=LibbyHellmann.com|access-date=November 6, 2020}}</ref> The film was nominated for seven ], winning "Worst Remake or Sequel". Furthermore, Roger Ebert placed the film on his "most hated" list.<ref name="eberthated"/> | |||
===''Bio-Dome'' (1996)=== | |||
{{Main|Bio-Dome{{!}}''Bio-Dome''}} | |||
The 1996 comedy film ''Bio-Dome'' focuses on two moronic stoner best friends, played by ] and ], who accidentally get trapped inside of the Bio-Dome owned by ], a hermetically sealed ecological system, after mistaking it for a mall while looking for a bathroom. | |||
For ], Eric Snider wrote in 2008 that "nothing can account for...the movie ''Bio-Dome'', which is–and I do not make this assertion lightly–the worst crime ever perpetrated against humanity throughout all of recorded history". Snider went on to call it "quite bad" and "certainly one of the worst comedies" he had ever seen, criticizing Pauly Shore's performance as unfunny and the film's writing as stupid.<ref>{{cite web |last=Snider |first=Eric |title=Eric's Bad Movies: Bio-Dome (1996) |url=http://www.mtv.com/news/2759537/erics-bad-movies-bio-dome-1996/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220710185442/http://www.mtv.com/news/2759537/erics-bad-movies-bio-dome-1996/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 10, 2022 |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=June 19, 2008}}</ref> ]{{'}}s Cassidy Ward described ''Bio-Dome'' as "one of the best-worst movies of all time", stating that its plot "strains credulity", while Jon O'Brien of '']'' called it "one of the worst movies ever made" and wrote that it "has nothing to offer but unconvincing pratfalls...tumbleweed one-liners...and some unashamed sexism, too".<ref>{{cite web |last=Ward |first=Cassidy |title=Bio-Dome was a stoner movie flop, but Biosphere 2 was a real experiment |url=https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/bio-dome-biosphere-2-real-science-movie |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 13, 2021}}</ref><ref name="inversekylie">{{cite web |last=O'Brien |first=Jon |title=How a '90s sci-fi comedy became one of the worst movies ever made |url=https://www.inverse.com/entertainment/bio-dome-movie-science-fiction-anniversary |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=January 17, 2021}}</ref> It was described as "almost unwatchably awful" and "a baffling piece of work" by Charles Bramesco of '']'', who wrote that it was a "perennial contender in the battle for the title of Worst Movie Ever".<ref>{{cite web |last=Bramesco |first=Charles |title=20 Years Later, The Pure Stupidity Of 'Bio-Dome' Remains Unmatched |url=https://uproxx.com/movies/bio-dome-20th-anniversary/ |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 12, 2016}}</ref> '']''{{'}}s Nathan Rabin wrote, "Critics and audiences alike found the ''Bio-Dome'' to be an abomination unto the Lord, an affront to the gods of cinema, and also a very bad movie, bad enough to be considered the gold standard of crapitude in Shore's oeuvre," noting that it had the lowest Metacritic score of any movie, with 1 out of 100.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Rabin, Nathan|author1-link=Nathan Rabin |title=I Watched This On Purpose: Bio-Dome |url=https://www.avclub.com/i-watched-this-on-purpose-bio-dome-1798214668 |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en-us |date=August 27, 2008}}</ref> ''Bio-Dome'' was named one of the worst movies of the 1990s in a poll conducted by ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Smith |first=Jodi |title=Rifftrax Compiles The 20 Worst Movies Of The 90s: Disagree With Them, Won't You? |url=https://www.pajiba.com/seriously_random_lists/rifftrax-compiles-the-20-worst-movies-of-the-90s.php |website=Pajiba |access-date=July 10, 2022 |date=January 21, 2015}}</ref> | |||
], who starred in the film as oceanographer Petra von Kant, called appearing in the film the worst decision of her career.<ref name="inversekylie"/> For his performance in the movie, Shore won the ] at the ], tying with ] for his performance in '']''.<ref>{{cite web |title=In film, these were worst of 1996 |url=https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1997/03/25/in-film-these-were-worst-of-1996/ |website=] |access-date=July 10, 2022 |language=en |date=March 25, 1997}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Batman & Robin'' (1997) === | |||
{{Main|Batman & Robin (film){{!}}''Batman & Robin'' (film)}} | |||
] ] sequel '']'' (1997) was named the worst movie ever made by '']''.]] | |||
''Batman & Robin'' is a ] based on the ] character ] and is the fourth and final installment of the ]. It is directed by ] and stars ] as ]/], ] as ], ] as ], ] as ]/], ] as ]/] and ] as ]. This film was largely criticized for its ] and ] approach, and Mr. Freeze's approach and ]s. | |||
{{as of|2017|June}}, ] Rotten Tomatoes reports that 11% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 89 reviews, certifying it "Rotten" with an average rating of 3.7/10, and the critics' consensus: "Joel Schumacher's tongue-in-cheek attitude hits an unbearable limit in ''Batman & Robin'', resulting in a frantic and mindless movie that's too jokey to care much for."<ref>{{cite web |url = https://rottentomatoes.com/m/1077027-batman_and_robin/ |title = Batman & Robin | website=] |publisher=] |access-date = July 6, 2019}}</ref> By comparison ] collected an average score of 28/100, based on 21 reviews.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://metacritic.com/movie/batman-robin |title = Batman & Robin (1997): Reviews | work=] |publisher=] |access-date=April 17, 2010}}</ref> ], of ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'' fame, wrote of the movie in his book, ''Movie Megacheese'', "''Batman & Robin'' is not the worst movie ever. No, indeed. It's the worst thing ever. Yes, it's the single worst thing that we as human beings have ever produced in recorded history."<ref>{{Cite book |url = https://archive.org/details/mikenelsonsmovie00nels |url-access = registration |page = |title = Mike Nelson's Movie Megacheese |publisher = Harper Collins |isbn = 978-0-380-81467-1 |last1 = Nelson |first1 = Michael J |date = June 20, 2000}}</ref> ''Batman & Robin'' also came in first in an ''Empire'' poll of the 50 worst films ever.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> Joel Schumacher apologized to disappointed fans on the 2005 DVD release of ''Batman & Robin''.<ref>{{cite AV media |people = Joel Schmacher |title = "Making of" Introduction | medium = DVD |publisher = Warner Bros. |year = 2005 }}</ref> In 2021, Clooney stated that he refused to let his wife watch the film, saying, "There are certain films I just go, 'I want my wife to have some respect for me'".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sharf |first=Zack |date=2021-10-05 |title=George Clooney Refuses to Show 'Batman & Robin' to His Wife: 'I Want Her to Have Respect for Me' |url=https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/george-clooney-refuses-show-wife-batman-robin-1234669477/ |access-date=2023-07-13 |website=IndieWire |language=en-US}}</ref> Clooney however would reprise his role as Bruce Wayne from the film in 2023's '']''.<ref></ref> | |||
=== ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' (''The Day and the Night'') (1997) === | |||
{{Main|Day and Night (1997 film){{!}}''Day and Night'' (1997 film)}} | |||
The French ] ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' was directed by philosopher ]. It follows a French author who fled to Mexico for a quiet life and an actress who is willing to seduce him to get a part in a film adapted from one of his books. Before its release, ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' was heavily promoted in many French newspapers and magazines.<ref name="ti">Jade Lindgaard and Xavier De La Porte, ''The Imposter: BHL in Wonderland'' (Translated by John Howe) London; Verso, 2012. {{ISBN|978-1-84467-748-1}} (p. 48-9).</ref> When the film premiered at the ] in 1997, hundreds of journalists walked out of the screening and those that stayed ridiculed it.<ref name="Plato">{{cite news |last=Dahlburg |first=John-Thor |title=The Film That Plato Didn't Make |newspaper=Los Angeles Times |date=March 28, 1997 |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-03-28-ca-42798-story.html |access-date=October 14, 2013}}</ref> Following its release, ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' was harshly criticized by the French media, with overwhelmingly negative reviews appearing in publications such as '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref name="ti"/> The film also did poorly commercially, with only 73,147 seats for ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' having been sold two months after its release.<ref name="ti"/> '']'' called it an "Absolute debacle" and ] referred to it as the "most preposterous film in history".<ref>{{cite web |last=Adams |first=Tim |title=Public Enemies by Michel Houellebecq and Bernard-Henri Lévy – review |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/dec/08/public-enemies-houellebecq-levy-review |website=] |access-date=May 10, 2023 |date=December 8, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=The volcano a molehill |newspaper=] |date=February 19, 1997 |url=https://www.humanite.fr/node/154931 |access-date=October 14, 2013}}</ref> ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' was considered the worst French film since 1945 by film magazine '']'', and its status as the "worst film in history" was discussed by the French version of '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.slate.fr/story/27925/pire-film-du-monde-bhl-concurrence |title="Le Jour et la Nuit", pire film de l'histoire ... Vraiment? |date=October 3, 2010 |work=]|access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> Likewise, English-language film site '']'' described its status as "one of the worst foreign language movies ever made", and filmmaker ] selected it as one of the worst movies ever made.<ref>{{cite web |last=Thiellement |first=Pacome |title=Le film que BHL n'a pas compris (pourtant c'est son préféré !) |url=https://www.blast-info.fr/emissions/2023/le-film-que-bhl-na-pas-compris-pourtant-cest-son-prefere-6fAP-oVYSFuCqF6zPuXNlA |website=] |access-date=May 10, 2023 |language=fr}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Pearson |first=Ben |title=BBC Polls Critics, Releases 100 Greatest Foreign Films List |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/562029/bbc-polls-critics-releases-100-greatest-foreign-films-list/ |website=] |access-date=May 10, 2023 |date=October 30, 2018}}</ref> An original documentary, ''Anatomy of a Massacre'', was released with the ''Le Jour et la Nuit'' DVD, and focused on its intense negative reception and failure.<ref>{{cite news |title=BHL et la critique ciné, c'était le jour et la nuit |newspaper=] |date=October 11, 2010 |url=http://www.20minutes.fr/medias/607145-media-bhl-critique-cine-jour-nuit |access-date=October 14, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Avengers'' (1998) === | |||
{{Main|The Avengers (1998 film){{!}}''The Avengers'' (1998 film)}} | |||
An adaptation of the popular 1960s ] of the same name, ''The Avengers'' starred ] as John Steed and ] as ], with ] as their antagonist, Sir August de Wynter. It was directed by ]. ''The Avengers'' began to receive negative publicity after ], the film's distributor, refused to allow any early press-screenings for movie reviewers.<ref>{{cite news |author-link=Godfrey Cheshire |first=Godfrey |last=Cheshire |url=https://variety.com/1998/film/reviews/the-avengers-sputtering-spies-steed-and-peel-lack-appeal-1200454676/ |title=The Avengers – Sputtering Spies: Steed and Peel Lack Appeal |work=Variety |date=August 17, 1998 |access-date=June 27, 2022}}</ref> After early test screenings, ''The Avengers'' was heavily edited by the studio.<ref name="NYTreview2">{{cite news |first=Janet |last=Maslin |author-link=Janet Maslin |url=https://www.nytimes.com/library/film/081598avengers-film-review.html |title='The Avengers': Shh! They're Trying Not to Be Noticed |newspaper=The New York Times |date=August 15, 1998 |access-date=January 27, 2015 }}</ref> On its release, ''The Avengers'' was savaged by film critics, with the '']'' stating "''The Avengers'' is being slated by critics as the worst film ever made" and adding that one reviewer had joked the film was such a "turkey" that the makers should have handed distribution to the poultry chain ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Film-''The Avengers'' |newspaper=The Birmingham Post |date=August 19, 1998 }}</ref> Several reviewers disparaged ''The Avengers'' for lacking the wit and excitement of its source material.<ref name="rt2">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.radiotimes.com/film/cjykx/the-avengers |title=Review: The Avengers |first=Alan |last=Jones |magazine=Radio Times |access-date=January 27, 2015 }}</ref><ref name="db">{{cite news |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/not-so-excellent-avengers-insults-old-series-awful-film-debases-tv-inspiration-article-1.807212 |title=Not So Excellent Avengers |first=David |last=Bianculli |newspaper=] |date=August 18, 1998 |access-date=January 27, 2015 }}</ref> ] strongly criticized ''The Avengers'': "With pseudo-suave repartee that would make ] blush and with so many shades of '']'' that one scene depicts man-size pastel teddy bears sitting around a conference table, it's a film to gall fans of the old TV series and perplex anyone else. I can't remember another Friday morning show where I heard actual cries of "Ugh!" on the way out the door" and finished her review with, "At a pared-down, barely rational 100 minutes, ''The Avengers'' is short but not short enough."<ref name="NYTreview2"/> | |||
David Bianculli said, "This ''Avengers'' film is so horrendously, painfully and thoroughly awful, it gives other cinematic clunkers like '']'' and ''Howard the Duck'' a good name."<ref name="db"/> Alan Jones in '']'' stated "The cult 1960s TV series gets royally shafted by Hollywood in this stunningly designed blockbuster that's stunningly awful in every other department ... Terrible special effects and zero chemistry between Fiennes and Thurman make this notorious disaster a total waste of everyone's time and energy."<ref name="rt2"/> ''The Avengers'' also shared a ] for "Worst Remake or Sequel" with the 1998 adaptations of '']'' and '']'' at the ]. ''Total Film'' magazine later voted Fiennes and Thurman in ''The Avengers'' as "The Worst Movie Double Act Of All Time".<ref>{{cite news |title=Double disasters make it to top of the flops |newspaper=] |location=Cardiff |date=December 1, 2003 }}</ref> The film also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.<ref name="Metacritic"/> | |||
=== ''Fatal Deviation'' (1998) === | |||
{{Main|Fatal Deviation{{!}}''Fatal Deviation''}} | |||
''Fatal Deviation'' is often credited as being the first ] to be filmed in Ireland. It stars martial artist James Bennett and ], who is best known for being a member of the boy band ]. '']'' and '']'' write that it is a mainstay of worst film lists.<ref name="irishpost"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/fatal-deviation/looking-back-at-fatal-deviation-irelands-only-martial-arts-film|title=Meet Fatal Deviation, Ireland's only martial arts film|last=Lines|first=Craig|date=November 4, 2015|access-date=June 7, 2019|work=]|archive-date=June 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190607211617/https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/fatal-deviation/looking-back-at-fatal-deviation-irelands-only-martial-arts-film|url-status=dead}}</ref> Luke McKinney of ] called it the worst film ever made, writing: "There are so many things about making a movie that Jimmy doesn't know, that you could replace film school with this movie alone--just screening it once for students and asking them to list all the things it did wrong. Anyone who doesn't write 'everything' instantly fails."<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.cracked.com/article_18632_irelands-only-kung-fu-movie-is-worst-film-ever-made.html|title=Ireland's Only Kung Fu Movie (Is The Worst Film Ever Made)|last=McKinney|first=Luke|date=July 3, 2010|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=]}}</ref> '']'' named it the worst Irish film of all time,<ref name="irishpost">{{cite web |url= https://www.irishpost.com/entertainment/definitive-ranking-7-worst-irish-films-time-158594|title= A definitive ranking of the 7 worst Irish films of all-time|first=Aidan|last=Lonergan|date= August 16, 2018|access-date= March 9, 2019|work= ]}}</ref> the '']'' wrote that it is "regarded as one of the worst films ever made" and ] called it "one of the worst commercial movies ever made".<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/westlife-what-next-26785226.html|title=Westlife: what next?|date= October 22, 2011|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Boehm |first=Simon |title=Ireland's First Martial Arts Movie Is Gloriously Bad |url=https://www.cbr.com/fatal-deviation-ireland-martial-arts-movie-cult-classic/ |website=] |access-date=July 13, 2022 |date=March 15, 2021}}</ref> ] placed it on its list of "10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die" and it was covered in '']''{{'}}s ''Bad Movie Diaries'' column.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://entertainment.ie/cinema/movie-news/10-so-bad-theyre-good-movies-you-need-to-see-before-you-die-227463/|title=10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die|last=Lloyd|first=Bryan|access-date=March 9, 2019|work=]|date=March 12, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/07/bad-movie-diaries-fatal-deviation-1998.html |title=Bad Movie Diaries: Fatal Deviation (1998)|last1=Vorel|first1=Jim|last2=Lowe|first2=Kenneth|access-date=June 7, 2019|work=]|date=July 31, 2018}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Parting Shots'' (1999) === | |||
{{Main|Parting Shots{{!}}''Parting Shots''}} | |||
The British ] ''Parting Shots'' was the last film directed by ]. It starred rock musician ] as a man who, after being told he has only six months to live, begins murdering people who have wronged him. ] took a very negative view of the film: "''Parting Shots'' ... is going to set the course of British film-making back 20 years. It is not only the worst British film produced in this country since '']'' (quite a feat in itself), it is a thoroughbred contender for the crown of Worst Film Ever Made."<ref>Andrew Collins, "How to Shoot a Real Turkey" '']'', March 28, 1999. ''Observer Screen'', p.6.</ref> In an interview about the film, Charlotte O'Sullivan, ]'s film editor, claimed ''Parting Shots'' was "the worst film I've ever seen". O'Sullivan also criticized it for glorifying vigilantism: "It's Michael Winner and you know, he doesn't have any sense of irony. He seems to be saying it is okay to go and kill people."<ref>"Winner's Turkey has a bad aftertaste". '']'', May 2, 1999 (p.7)</ref> The journalist ] later claimed "''Parting Shots'' ... was directed by Michael Winner and despite the glittering cast, was possibly the worst film ever made."<ref>Miles Kingston, "One or two plots to occupy my declining years". '']'', May 3, 2005, (p.30).</ref> I. Q. Hunter listed ''Parting Shots'' as one of the candidates for "the Worst British film ever made".<ref name="iqh"/> ''Parting Shots'' was also featured in a poll of ''Empire'' magazine readers' "50 Worst Movies Ever" poll.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> | |||
=== ''The Underground Comedy Movie'' (1999) === | |||
{{Main|The Underground Comedy Movie{{!}}''The Underground Comedy Movie''}} | |||
''The Underground Comedy Movie'' is based on a ] show from 1988. Director and lead actor ] constructed the film out of a series of tasteless, ] (including ] loudly using the restroom and a superhero named ''Dickman'' who dresses in a giant ] costume and defeats his enemies by squirting them with ]). In 1999, Offer filed a suit against ] and the co-directors of '']'' (1998), ], claiming that 14 scenes in ''Mary'' were stolen from his film.<ref name="ewol">{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/1999/06/11/underground-comedy-movie-2/|title=Movie Review Underground Comedy Movie |date=June 11, 1999|access-date=December 3, 2019|magazine=]|last=Gleiberman|first=Owen}}</ref> The Farrellys released this statement: "We've never heard of him, we've never heard of his movie, and it's all a bunch of baloney."<ref name="ewx">{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/1998/10/16/monitor-269/|title=Monitor: Celebrity news for October 16, 1998|last1=Karger|first1=Dave|first2=Suna|last2=Chang|date=October 16, 1998|magazine=]|access-date=December 3, 2019}}</ref> ] of '']'' referred to it as a "wretched film" and stated that "''The Underground Comedy Movie'' stands as a monument to ineptitude and self-delusion."<ref name="nytvangelder">{{cite news|url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/film/052899comedy-film-review.html|title=Lawrence Van Gelder's review of ''The Underground Comedy Movie'' |last=Van Gelder |first=Lawrence |author-link=Lawrence Van Gelder |work=]|date=May 28, 1999 |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> ] of the '']'' said it "may be the least amusing comedy ever made".<ref>{{cite news|last=Dreher|first=Rod|author-link=Rod Dreher|title='Comedy' is Really Buried by Its Trash|work=]|date=May 28, 1999}}</ref> Dave Shulman of '']'' described it as a "serious contender for the single worst movie ever made",<ref>{{cite web |title=Critic's Corner S-Z |url=http://thestinkers.com/critics3.html#Underground%20Comedy%20Movie |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010412233933/http://thestinkers.com/critics3.html#Underground%20Comedy%20Movie |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 12, 2001 |website=] |access-date=July 9, 2022}}</ref> while Stinkers Bad Movie Awards co-founder Mike Lancaster said that it was the worst film that he had ever paid to see.<ref name="Lancaster"/> ] covered the film in his column detailing terrible films and stated that: "nothing I've covered for this column was quite as soul-crushingly, brain-meltingly terrible as ... ''The Underground Comedy Movie''."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2018/9/4/this-looks-terrible-the-underground-comedy-movie-1999|title=This Looks Terrible! The Underground Comedy Movie (1999)|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|work=nathanrabin.com|date=September 4, 2018|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref> Thom Bennett at '']'', wrote "Anyone offended by unbearably bad films, jokes that are not funny and wasting 90 minutes of their lives is, as promised, guaranteed to be offended. In fact, to even call this mess a comedy is giving it far too much credit", and "''The Underground Comedy Movie'' may well be the worst film I have ever seen."<ref name="fji">{{cite web|url=http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/esearch/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000697847|title=Underground Comedy Movie, The|last=Bennett|first=Thom|work=]|access-date=March 7, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105184223/http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/esearch/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000697847|archive-date=November 5, 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> Writing in '']'', Peter Young said, "I am pretty sure that I can declare this The Worst Film I Have Ever Seen."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.centralwesterndaily.com.au/story/1386763/comedy-film-best-kept-underground/|title=Comedy film best kept underground|last=Young|first=Peter|work=]|date=March 26, 2013|access-date=March 6, 2018}}</ref> | |||
== 2000s == | |||
=== ''Battlefield Earth'' (2000) === | |||
{{Main|Battlefield Earth (film){{!}}''Battlefield Earth'' (film)}} | |||
] during '']''{{'s}} promotional tour]] | |||
''Battlefield Earth'' is based on the first half of ]'s 1982 ], and stars ], ] and ]. Although a sequel covering the second half of the book was planned, the panning from critics, poor box-office performance, and financial ruin of ] killed off such plans. It was criticized for a poor script, hammy acting, overuse of ]s, repetitive dialogue, and several inconsistencies and plot holes. The movie's producer, Franchise Pictures, was later forced out of business after it emerged that it had fraudulently overstated the film's budget by $31 million. It has a 3% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q811023|title=Battlefield Earth}}</ref> where it is included in the top 100 worst-reviewed movies of all time.<ref name="rt100worst"/><ref name="rottenworst">{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ |title=The worst of the worst pictures |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=September 21, 2009 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=November 23, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123212257/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Roger Ebert predicted that the film, "for decades to come will be the punch line of jokes about bad movies".<ref name="BEarth">{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/battlefield-earth-2000 |work=] |title=Battlefield Earth movie review (2000) |date=May 12, 2000 |access-date=October 11, 2020 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert}}</ref> Ebert also wrote, "The director, ], has learned from better films that directors sometimes tilt their cameras, but he has not learned why".<ref name="BEarth"/> It is also on his "most hated" list.<ref name="eberthated">{{cite news|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/eberts-most-hated |title=Ebert's Most Hated |work=] |date=August 11, 2005 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |access-date=January 17, 2011}}</ref> Nathan Rabin covered the film as part of his ''My World of Flops'' column for '']'', calling it "a fiasco that occupies a distinguished place high atop the pantheon of widely reviled crap" and said, "A legendary disaster well before it finished completion, ''Battlefield Earth'' hit theaters with a "Kick Me" sign on it so massive it could be detected from outer space."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.avclub.com/my-year-of-flops-case-file-66-battlefield-earth-1798212540 |title=My Year OF Flops Case File #66: Battlefield Earth |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |website=] |date=September 11, 2007 |language=en-US |access-date=January 27, 2019}}</ref> | |||
It won seven ], including Worst Picture and Worst Screen Couple (John Travolta and "anyone on the screen with him"). In 2005, an eighth Razzie (for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years) was awarded to the film,<ref>{{cite web |title=Awards for Battlefield Earth |work=IMDb |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0185183/awards |access-date=June 27, 2008}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=March 2023}} and in 2010 it won a ninth Razzie at the ] for ''Worst Picture of the Decade''.<ref name="30thRazzies">{{cite web |title=Razzie Noms for Worst Picture of the Decade |work=Razzies.com |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/09NomPOD.asp |access-date=February 2, 2010}}</ref> Listing the film as one of the worst decisions in movie history, '']'' quipped that, "If Earth sticks around long enough for the Golden Raspberry Awards to hand out a "worst movie of the century" at their 2100 ceremony, it'll probably win that, too."<ref name="50decisions"/> It won more Razzies than any film in the history of the awards at the time,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/07release.asp |title=Golden Raspberry Award Foundation |work=Razzies.com |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130321103846/http://www.razzies.com/history/07release.asp |archive-date=March 21, 2013}}</ref> until '']'' surpassed its record with 10 wins in 2012.<ref name=RazzieWin/> | |||
The movie appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic">{{cite web |url=https://www.metacritic.com/browse/movies/score/metascore/all?sort=asc |title=Best Movies of All Time |work=] |publisher=] |access-date=April 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230215194915/https://www.metacritic.com/browse/movies/score/metascore/all?sort=asc |archive-date=February 15, 2023 |url-status=dead}}</ref> and is on the ]'s (MRQE) 50 Worst Movies list,<ref name="MRQE50">{{cite web |url=https://www.mrqe.com/lists/50_worst_movies |title=50 Worst Movies |work=] |access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> as well as worst film lists from ''Screen Rant'', ''Vanity Fair'', ''Flavorwire'', '']'' and the ''New York Daily News''.<ref name="Flavorwire"/><ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="italianvanity"/><ref name="digitaltrends"/><ref name="NYDN"/> ''Empire'' named it the second worst movie ever made after '']'' and '']'' listed it as the worst movie ever made.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/><ref name="battlefieldregister">{{cite web |title=Battlefield Earth ruled worst film Ever |work=]|last=Haines |first=Lester |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/20/worst_movie/ |access-date=April 5, 2018 |date=April 20, 2012}}</ref> Pepper and Whitaker both expressed regret for their involvement in ''Battlefield Earth'', while film screenwriter ] later apologized for making "the suckiest movie ever".<ref>{{cite web |last=Dembrow |first=Dylan |title=15 Things You Didn't Know About The Disastrous Battlefield Earth |url=https://screenrant.com/battlefield-earth-movie-worst-trivia-facts-secrets/ |website=] |date=January 28, 2018 |access-date=December 5, 2020}}</ref><ref name="battlefieldregister"/> | |||
===''Titanic: The Legend Goes On'' (2000)=== | |||
{{main|Titanic: The Legend Goes On{{!}}''Titanic: The Legend Goes On''}} | |||
''Titanic: The Legend Goes On'' (also known as ''Titanic, mille e una storia'', ''Titanic: La leggenda continua'' and ''Titanic: The Animated Movie'') is an Italian animated ] about ] of the {{RMS|Titanic}}. It features a similar romantic storyline to ]'s 1997 '']'' film, but also has a number of talking animals (most notably, a ] dog).<ref name="screenrantanimated"/> Reviews condemned the quality of the animation and criticized the plot for being insensitive to the memory of the victims of the ''Titanic''.<ref name="screenrantanimated"/> | |||
'']'' named ''Titanic: The Legend Goes On'' as "officially the worst film ever made", after it topped a list of the 66 worst films ever.<ref name=TotalFilm/> An article from '']'' also described it as one of the worst films ever made, but notes that it " the cult following that other bad films often acquire," stating: "''Titanic: The Legend Goes On'' is too heinous for such fond pleasures."<ref>{{cite web |last=Mattson |first=Kelcie |title=I Watched the Animated Titanic Musical So You Don't Have To |url=https://collider.com/titanic-animated-movie/ |website=] |access-date=May 3, 2024 |language=en |date=September 11, 2023}}</ref> Critic Tim Brayton said that "It is one of the most surreally bad films I have ever encountered", adding: "For sheer mesmerising grotesqueness, there's almost nothing I can name that beats it, and no fan of bad movies can say that their life is complete till they've been exposed to it."<ref>{{cite web |title=Titanic: The Animated Movie |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/titanic_the_animated_movie |website=] |access-date=January 28, 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Brayton |first=Tim |title=Titanic: The Legend Goes On... (2000) – Movie Review |url=https://www.alternateending.com/2020/05/titanic-the-legend-goes-on-2000.html |website=Alternate Ending |access-date=January 28, 2022 |date=May 20, 2020}}</ref> ''Total Film'' also included the film on a list of the worst kids' movies, describing it as being "widely considered one of the worst animated films ever made",<ref name="kidsmovie">{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/50-worst-kids-movies/|title=50 Worst Kids Movies|last=Winning|first=Joshua|work=]|publisher=]|date=November 8, 2011|access-date=July 8, 2017 }}</ref> while Spanish film magazine '']'' selected it as one of the 20 worst films ever made.<ref name="fotogramas">{{cite web |last=Rosado |first=Ricardo |title=Las 20 peores películas de la historia del cine: un homenaje |url=https://www.fotogramas.es/noticias-cine/g19447838/20-peores-peliculas-historia/?slide=19 |website=] |access-date=January 26, 2022 |language=es-ES |date=October 1, 2020}}</ref> '']'' included it on a list of the 12 worst animated films of all time, and it topped a ''Showbiz Cheat Sheet'' list of the top 10 worst animated films ever, with author Will Roberts commenting that " list of the worst animated films of all time begins with ... ''Titanic: The Legend Goes On''".<ref name="screenrantanimated"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/worst-animated-movies.html/|title=10 Worst Animated Movies of All Time|work=Showbiz Cheat Sheet|last=Roberts|first=Will|date=January 15, 2017|access-date=January 28, 2022|archive-date=January 22, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220122103918/https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/worst-animated-movies.html/|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2012, ''Titanic: The Legend Goes On'' became the lowest-rated film on ]'s Bottom 100 list.<ref>{{cite web |last=Renzetti |first=Jackie |title=Not Your Cameron's "Titanic" |url=https://mndaily.com/223181/arts-entertainment/not-your-camerons-titanic/ |newspaper=] |date= April 16, 2014|access-date=January 26, 2022}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Freddy Got Fingered'' (2001) === | |||
{{Main|Freddy Got Fingered{{!}}''Freddy Got Fingered''}} | |||
The comedy film ''Freddy Got Fingered'' stars ], who also wrote and directed it, featuring largely ] and ] similar to that featured in '']''. In the film, Green stars as a 28-year-old slacker and cartoonist who falsely accuses his father of ] when he questions his son's life goals. ''Freddy Got Fingered'' received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with ] critic ] declaring it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history."<ref>{{cite news |last=Clinton |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Clinton |title='Freddy Got Fingered' is a bad, bad film |work=CNN|date=April 19, 2001 |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/19/Freddy.Fingered/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061230080518/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/19/Freddy.Fingered/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 30, 2006 |access-date=October 11, 2020}}</ref> Warren Epstein of '']'' described ''Freddy Got Fingered'' as "the worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5965104.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180319151405/https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5965104.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 19, 2018 |title=Task of fingering worst movies of all time a real handful|first=Warren |last=Epstein |newspaper=The Gazette |location=Colorado Springs, CO|date=April 26, 2001}}</ref> A review in '']'' said: "If ever a movie testified to the utter creative bankruptcy of the Hollywood film industry, it is the abomination known as ''Freddy Got Fingered''."<ref>{{cite news |last=Hughes |first=Scott |title=The worst movie ever? |work=] |date=April 26, 2001 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2001/apr/26/artsfeatures2 |access-date=February 9, 2011 |location=London}}</ref> Roger Ebert included the film on his "most hated" list,<ref name="eberthated"/> gave it zero out of four stars and wrote: "This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert |title=Freddy Got Fingered movie review (2001) |work=] |date=April 20, 2001 |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/freddy-got-fingered-2001 |access-date=October 11, 2020}}</ref> | |||
''Freddy Got Fingered'' was nominated for eight awards at the ], and won for Worst Picture, Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, and Worst On-Screen Couple.<ref name="BBC0211">{{cite news |title=Freddy heads Razzies nominations |work=BBC News |date=February 11, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1814018.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}}</ref><ref name="BBC0323">{{cite news |last=Waters |first=Darren |title=Green gets fingered for Razzies |work=BBC News |date=March 23, 2002 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/entertainment/2002/oscars_2002/1889555.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}}</ref> Razzies founder ] called it "offensive, stupid and obnoxious" and said it had "no redeeming value".<ref name="BBC0211"/> Green accepted his awards in person, traveling to the ceremony in a white ], wearing a tuxedo and rolling out his own ] to the presentation. The movie has an 11% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/freddy_got_fingered/ |title=Freddy Got Fingered |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=November 18, 2013}}</ref> In 2010, the film was nominated at the ] for Worst Picture of the Decade,<ref name="30thRazzies"/> though it lost to ''Battlefield Earth''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Masters |first=Tim |title=Sandra Bullock wins worst actress award at Razzies |work=BBC News |date=March 7, 2010 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8554035.stm |access-date=February 9, 2011}}</ref> ''Freddy Got Fingered'' also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> was featured in ''Empire''{{'s}} list of the 50 Worst Movies Ever poll,<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever">{{cite web |url = https://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/50-worst-movies-ever-2/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200201223813/https://www.empireonline.com/movies/features/50-worst-movies-ever-2/ |title = The 50 Worst Movies Ever | work=] |date=February 4, 2010 |archive-date=February 1, 2020 |access-date = March 17, 2014}}</ref> and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> | |||
=== ''Glitter'' (2001) === | |||
{{Main|Glitter (film){{!}}''Glitter'' (film)}} | |||
] for the film in 2001; she was consequently bought out of her $100 million recording contract with ] for approximately $28 million.<ref name=contract>{{cite web|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CSTB&p_theme=cstb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F115C6D597A4809&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|title=Mariah Carries On With Record Deal, Recovery|last=Zwecker|first=Bill|work=] |date=January 22, 2002|access-date=June 16, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/2001-razzie-nominees-winners_topic351.html|date=December 4, 2005|access-date=June 30, 2012|work=]|title=2001 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303171013/http://www.razzies.com/forum/2001-razzie-nominees-winners_topic351.html|archive-date=March 3, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>]] | |||
Starring ]<ref name="negativeten">{{Cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-rated-negative-10-reddit/|title=10 Movies That Are A Negative 10 Out Of 10, According To Reddit|first=Lukas|last=Shayo|date=November 12, 2022|website=ScreenRant}}</ref> in the lead role as an aspiring singer in 1980s ], the romantic musical drama ''Glitter'' was intended to be her breakthrough role but was a critical failure and a box-office bomb. '']'' claimed that ''Glitter'' "was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever".<ref>{{cite news |title=Mariah Carey's flop movie 'Glitter' almost killed her |newspaper= ] |date=November 4, 2009 |quote=Carey, 39, had to be hospitalised due to an emotional breakdown after Glitter was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever.}}</ref> '']'' stated that "''Glitter'' isn't just one of the worst music-themed films ever — it's one of the worst films ever made, period."<ref>{{cite web|title=The 30 worst Vanity Projects of all time|url=http://fadeinonline.com/the-30-worst-vanity-projects-of-all-time.html|website=Fadeinonline.com|date=June 2, 2013|publisher=]|access-date=August 23, 2015|archive-date=September 8, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908144455/http://fadeinonline.com/the-30-worst-vanity-projects-of-all-time.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> Author Bob McCann wrote in ''Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television'' that it's "rightfully in the running as one of the worst films ever made".<ref>{{cite book |first=McCann |last=Bob |title=Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television |location=New York |publisher=Performing Arts |year=2009 |isbn=9780786458042 |page=70 }}</ref> ],<ref name=":1">{{cite news|url=https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/absolute-stinkers-the-15-worst-movies-of-all-time/news-story/0023085ea96fa3f2c581778a070f1308|title=Absolute stinkers: The 15 worst movies of all time|last=Stephenson|first=Alison|date=November 13, 2013|access-date=April 17, 2019|website=]}}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{cite web|title=Worst Films Ever: Glitter|url=http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/07/worst-films-ever-glitter/|website=]|access-date=August 23, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924030115/http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/07/worst-films-ever-glitter/|archive-date=September 24, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''Flavorwire'',<ref name="Flavorwire"/> ''Screen Rant'',<ref name="Screen Rant"/> ''Vanity Fair'',<ref name="italianvanity"/> Metacritic,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and ''Empire'' are amongst those who have listed it as one of the worst films ever made.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> | |||
''Glitter'' received six Razzie nominations, and Carey won for Worst Actress.<ref>{{cite news|title=Tom Green, Estella Warren are Razzie ''winners'' |url=https://www.ew.com/article/2002/03/25/tom-green-estella-warren-are-razzie-winners |newspaper=Entertainment Weekly |access-date=August 23, 2015 |first=Brian |last=Hiatt |date=March 25, 2002}}</ref> It was also featured in ''The Official Razzie Movie Guide'', and in 2005, it was nominated for "Worst Musical of Our First 25 Years", but lost to '']''. In an interview in 2010, Carey stated that she believed that the film's failure at the box office was largely due to the ] being released the same day as the ].<ref name="digitalspy">{{cite web|title=Carey Blames 9/11 For 'Glitter' Flop|work=]|publisher=]|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a199302/carey-blames-911-for-glitter-flop.html|last=Reynolds|first=Simon|date=January 26, 2010|access-date=August 23, 2015}}</ref> It has a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 87 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|title=Glitter (2001)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/glitter|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=June 3, 2017}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Swept Away'' (2002) === | |||
{{Main|Swept Away (2002 film){{!}}''Swept Away'' (2002 film)}} | |||
] received a ] for her performance in the ] '']'', making her the most awarded actress in the institution's history.<ref>{{Cite web|date=February 21, 2012|title=All-Time Razzie Cham-Peens LIST – The Official Razzie® Forum|url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/alltime-razzie-champeens-list_topic5372.html|access-date=September 3, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221214230/http://www.razzies.com/forum/alltime-razzie-champeens-list_topic5372.html|archive-date=February 21, 2012|publisher=]}}</ref>]] | |||
A remake of ], the ] film ''Swept Away'' was directed by ] and starred his then-wife ] and ]. It received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with most of the criticism going towards Madonna's bad acting, the original film being considered superior and the remake being considered just a star vehicle for Madonna.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1410000/Madonna-and-Guy-swept-away-on-tide-of-criticism.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1410000/Madonna-and-Guy-swept-away-on-tide-of-criticism.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Madonna and Guy swept away on tide of criticism|last=Poole|first=Oliver|work=]|date=October 11, 2002|access-date=December 28, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> ] of '']'' said: "If there is one thing worse than a Guy Ritchie movie, it's a Guy Ritchie movie with Madonna in it."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://observer.com/2002/10/not-swept-away-by-madonna/|title=Not Swept Away By Madonna|date=October 21, 2002|work=]|language=en|access-date=December 28, 2018}}</ref> '']'' critic John Anderson said, "New ways of describing badness need to be invented to describe exactly how bad it is."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1116774-swept_away/reviews/?page=2&sort=|title=Swept Away – Movie Reviews |website=]|publisher=]|access-date=December 28, 2018}}</ref> ] of '']'' discussed the movie in an article on what makes a movie the worst of all time and said, " '']'' has a certain campy allure that grows a bit each time I see it. Madonna's ''Swept Away'' doesn't; it seems more amateurish on each viewing, like a morass that starts out as a quagmire, then morphs into a cesspool and finally turns into a slime pit on the road to its ultimate destination in the bowels of Hell."<ref name="queenan">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2008/mar/21/1|title=Joe Queenan on the worst movie of all time|last=Queenan|first=Joe|author-link=Joe Queenan (author)|date=March 21, 2008|work=]|access-date=December 28, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> ], also from ''The Guardian'', selected it as her pick for the worst film ever made.<ref name="guardianworst"/> | |||
''Swept Away'' was also a ]; against a $10 million budget, it grossed $598,645 in the United States and around $437,875 from foreign territories for a worldwide total gross of $1,036,520.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sweptaway.htm|title=Swept Away (2002)|website=Box Office Mojo|access-date=December 28, 2018}}</ref> It received five awards at the ] and became the first film to win both Worst Picture and Worst Remake or Sequel. At the ], it was nominated for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years, and at the ], it was nominated for Worst Picture of the Decade, but 'lost' to ''Battlefield Earth'' at both ceremonies. ''Empire'' ranked it #20 in its list of "The 50 Worst Movies Ever",<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> and ] ranked it #7 in its list of "The worst movies ever to grace the screen".<ref name="afterellen">{{Cite web|url=https://www.afterellen.com/movies/58522-the-worst-movies-ever-to-grace-the-screen|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422135335/https://afterellen.com/movies/58522-the-worst-movies-ever-to-grace-the-screen|title=The worst movies ever to grace the screen|date=September 8, 2009|website=]|access-date=January 30, 2019|archive-date=April 22, 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== ''The Master of Disguise'' (2002) === | |||
{{Main|The Master of Disguise{{!}}''The Master of Disguise''}} | |||
The comedy film ''The Master of Disguise'' was produced in part by ] and stars ] as Pistachio Disguisey, an undercover Italian waiter who must save his father Fabbrizio (]) from the evil Devlin Bowman (]) by using his inherent skills in disguise. Although the film was a box office success, it received scathing reviews from critics upon its release, many of which pointed out its sophomoric plot, unfunny humor (in particular, its ] gags) and disguises that would clearly not be recognized by children (such as ] from '']''). Many critics also pointed out the short running time, consisting of 72 minutes of the film itself and over ten minutes of end credits juxtaposed with outtakes, including two post credit scenes. Roger Ebert gave it one star out of four, claiming, "The movie is a desperate miscalculation. It gives poor Dana Carvey nothing to do that is really funny, and then expects us to laugh because he acts so goofy all the time."<ref>{{cite web|last=Fragoso |first=Sam |url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/the-master-of-disguise-2002 |title=The Master Of Disguise Movie Review (2002) |work=] |date=August 2, 2002 |access-date=March 5, 2014}}</ref> Alan Morrison, writing for ''Empire'', proclaimed that ''The Master of Disguise'' was "the worst film ever made: a film about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots",<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> while Matthew Turner of ''ViewLondon'' remarked, "This is a serious contender for the title of The Worst Film Ever Made."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.viewlondon.co.uk/films/the-master-of-disguise-film-review-3673.html |title=The Master of Disguise Film Review – The Master of Disguise Film Pictures, The Master of Disguise Film Trailer |work=Viewlondon.co.uk |date=October 16, 2006 |access-date=March 5, 2014}}</ref> The film holds a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 104 reviews,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/master_of_disguise/ |title=The Master of Disguise |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 24, 2014}}</ref> and is featured on the site's list of the top 100 worst-reviewed films of all time.<ref name="rt100worst"/> It also appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> A cameo appearance by ] landed her a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the ], but she lost to ] for '']''. | |||
=== ''Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever'' (2002) === | |||
{{Main|Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever{{!}}''Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever''}} | |||
The action film ''Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever'' stars ] and ] as opposing secret agents. Critics panned it, generally regarding it as having no redeeming features, not even the unintentional comedic value normally associated with bad films. They variously described the film as "A picture for idiots", "Boring to an amazing degree", "A fine achievement in stupidity and dullness", "Dreadful", " new meaning to the word incoherent", and "bad on just about every level". One critic suggested an alternative title as "''Simplistic: Bullets Vs. Humans''".<ref>{{cite web |title=David Hunter Movie Reviews |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/critics/david-hunter/movies |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=June 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211217224538/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/critics/david-hunter/movies |archive-date=December 17, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] of '']'' wrote, "You could run this film backward, soundtrack included, and it would make no less sense."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A42115-2002Sep19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628231426/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A42115-2002Sep19 |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |last=Hunter |first=Stephen |author-link=Stephen Hunter |title=''Goosey Lucy: 'Ballistic,' a Lot of Noisy Dumdum'' |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 20, 2002 |access-date=January 17, 2011}}</ref> Roger Ebert called the movie "a chaotic mess, overloaded with special effects and explosions, light on continuity, sanity and coherence."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/ballistic-ecks-vs-sever-2002 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever movie review (2002) |date=September 20, 2020 |access-date=October 11, 2020}}</ref> In addition to being lambasted by critics, it was a disaster financially, recouping just over $19.9 million of its $70 million budget. In March 2007, Rotten Tomatoes ranked it #1 among "The Worst of the Worst" movie list, with 108 "rotten" reviews and no "fresh" ones.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/?r=1&mid=1116131 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090303154232/https://rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/?r=1&mid=1116131 |title=ROTTEN TOMATOES: The Worst of the Worst Pictures |work=Rotten Tomatoes |archive-date=March 3, 2009 |access-date=October 11, 2020}}</ref> ''Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever'' remains the worst reviewed film on Rotten Tomatoes, as it is at the top of their 100 Worst Films of All time list.<ref name="rt100worst"/> '']'' has also nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Ebert included it in his "most hated" list.<ref name="Mental Floss"/><ref name="eberthated"/> | |||
=== ''Ben and Arthur'' (2002) === | |||
{{Main|Ben and Arthur{{!}}''Ben and Arthur''}} | |||
A low-budget 2002 American romantic drama film about the titular gay couple who come into conflict with Arthur's religious brother, ''Ben and Arthur'' was written, directed, produced, edited, and scored by Sam Mraovich, who also played the character Arthur. ''Ben and Arthur'' received strong criticism (especially from the LGBT community) for its low budget and poor plotting. ] described it as the "worst gay movie of all time".<ref name="peitzman">{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/louispeitzman/the-man-behind-the-worst-gay-movie-of-all-time-doesnt-care-i |title=The Man Behind The "Worst Gay Movie Of All Time" Doesn't Care If You Hate It |first=Louis |last=Peitzman |publisher=] |date=September 5, 2014 |access-date=March 15, 2018}}</ref> The gay popular culture site ] described ''Ben and Arthur'' as "unintelligible" and ended its review by calling it the "Worst. Movie. Ever."<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.queerty.com/ben-arthur-the-worst-gay-movie-of-all-time-20090220 |title=Ben & Arthur: The Worst Gay Movie of All Time |first=Japhy |last=Grant |magazine=] |date=February 20, 2009 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }}</ref> The gay movie review site Cinemaqueer likewise stated: "''Ben and Arthur'' is so terrible that it has awoken the dormant Bette Davis in me. It is so painfully bad that it wouldn't even make good fodder on '']''. This just might possibly be the worst movie I have ever seen ... Unless you get a kick out of mocking bad films, avoid this one at all costs."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cinemaqueer.com/review%20pages/9deadgayguysben.html |title=9 dead gay guys/ben & arthur |first=Michael D. |last=Klemm |website=Cinemaqueer |date=July 2004 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }}</ref> Michael Adams, reviewing the film for his book ''Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies'', describes it thus: "''Ben & Arthur'' is as over-the-top insane as it is ludicrously executed ... the production values, from biscuits on plates comprising the main course of a candlelit dinner to a church literally having a cardboard cross and a cartoon Jesus on the wall, are as bad as anything I've seen."{{sfn|Adams|page=301}} A Rotten Tomatoes article placed ''Ben and Arthur'' on their list of "Films So Bad They're Unmissable", saying "If ]'s '']'' is the over-wrought, melodramatic and self-pitying heterosexual camp classic of choice, then Sam Mraovich's ''Ben & Arthur'' is its gay equivalent." Rotten Tomatoes also stated "Every scene, every line, every hissy fit is simultaneously hilariously amateur and hysterically fever-pitched."<ref name="sobad">{{cite web |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/25-movies-so-bad-theyre-unmissable/|title=25 Movies So Bad They're Unmissable |last=Adams |first=Michael |website=] |publisher=] |date=January 30, 2010 |access-date=January 25, 2015 }}</ref> ''Total Film'' ranked ''Ben and Arthur'' at No. 58 in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.<ref name="TotalFilm">{{cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/66-worst-movies-of-all-time/|title=66 Worst Movies Of All Time|date=February 15, 2012 |work=]|publisher=]|access-date=September 30, 2013 }}</ref> Mraovich finds ''Ben and Arthur''{{'}}s placement among the canon of worst films to be a blessing as the film has received more attention than he ever anticipated.<ref name="peitzman"/> | |||
=== ''From Justin to Kelly'' (2003) === | |||
{{Main|From Justin to Kelly{{!}}''From Justin to Kelly''}} | |||
The romantic-comedy musical ''From Justin to Kelly'' stars ] and ],<ref name="nathanrabin.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2021/3/23/adventures-of-pluto-nash-and-13-other-critically-maligned-flops-that-bombed-because-they-fucking-suck|title=Adventures of Pluto Nash and 13 Other Critically Maligned Flops That Bombed Because They Fucking Suck|website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place|date=March 23, 2021 }}</ref> the winner and runner-up, respectively, of the ] of '']''. The film was a critical and commercial disaster, earning only $4.9 million at the North American box office and achieving a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 63 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/from_justin_to_kelly/ |title=From Justin To Kelly |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 24, 2014}}</ref> ] of '']'' described ''From Justin to Kelly'' as "a monstrous ''Idol'' movie musical that in the most generous light is the worst film so far this century",<ref name="kc">{{Cite web |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1156616,00.html |title=Miss Independent |first=Josh |last=Tyrangiel |work=Time Magazine |date=February 5, 2006}}</ref> while '']'' referred to it as "the world's worst movie".<ref>"Dishing it!" ''The Free Lance–Star'', July 9, 2003, (p.56).</ref> Nathan Rabin, reviewing the film for his "My Year of Flops" series, stated, "All films require suspension of disbelief. ''From Justin To Kelly'' requires something more like a temporary lobotomy. Nothing about the main characters or their relationships makes sense."<ref name="fjtk">{{Cite web |url=https://www.avclub.com/contest-winning-case-file-150-from-justin-to-kelly-1798218477 |title=Contest-Winning Case File #150: From Justin To Kelly |first=Nathan |last=Rabin |work=] |date=November 11, 2009 |access-date=27 February 2024}}</ref> It won a special ]—"Governor's Award – Distinguished Under-Achievement in Choreography"—at the ].<ref>"Gigli Takes Razzie Dishonors as Year's Worst", '']'', March 1, 2004 (p.20)</ref> It was nominated for eight additional Razzies (including a second special award, "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie"), and a year later it won for ]. ''Total Film'', ''Screen Rant'' and ''Digital Trends'' included ''From Justin to Kelly'' on their worst film lists.<ref name="digitaltrends"/><ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="TotalFilm"/> In a later interview, Clarkson expressed regret over ''From Justin to Kelly'', stating she only did it because she was contractually obligated to do so: "I knew when I read the script it was going to be real, real bad, but when I won, I signed that piece of paper, and I could not get out of it."<ref name="kc"/> | |||
=== ''The Room'' (2003) === | |||
{{Main|The Room{{!}}''The Room''}} | |||
] in a promotional picture for the 2003 ] '']'']] | |||
The independently produced ''The Room'', about an amiable banker whose friends betray him one by one, has been called "the '']'' of bad movies" by some critics.<ref name="ew1">{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2008/12/12/crazy-cult-room/|title=The Crazy Cult of 'The Room'|date=July 20, 2009 |magazine=] |access-date=December 3, 2019|first=Clark |last=Collis}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/the-couch-surfer-it-may-be-sublimely-rubbish-but-the-room-makes-audiences-happy-1752708.html |title=The Couch Surfer: 'It may be sublimely rubbish, but The Room makes audiences happy' |date=July 20, 2009 |work=The Independent |access-date=November 23, 2009 |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/article/2008/12/30/the-room-postsc/ |title='The Room': Worst movie ever? Don't tell that to its suddenly in-demand star |last=Collis |first=Clark |date=December 30, 2008 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |access-date=December 3, 2019}}</ref> ''], ], ], ]'' and '']'' called it the worst film ever made.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rose|first=Steve|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2009/sep/10/cinema-the-room-cult|title=Is this the worst movie ever made?|date=September 9, 2009|work=The Guardian|access-date=March 18, 2020|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/12/2/16720012/the-room-tommy-wiseau-backstory-explained|title=The Room: how the worst movie ever became a Hollywood legend as bizarre as its creator|last=Romano|first=Aja|date=December 2, 2017|website=Vox|language=en|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/the-room-is-the-worst-movie-ever-made-but-ive-seen-it-a-hundred-times--without-irony/2017/11/30/6475b096-d3ae-11e7-b62d-d9345ced896d_story.html|title=Perspective {{!}} 'The Room' is the worst movie ever made, but I've seen it a hundred times — without irony|last=Park|first=Gene|date=November 30, 2017|newspaper=Washington Post|language=en|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-05/the-room-tommy-wiseau-worst-film-ever-made-endures/9223516|title=The worst movie ever made, explained|last=Donoughue|first=Paul|date=December 5, 2017|website=ABC News|language=en-AU|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/schlechtester-film-aller-zeiten-wie-eine-atombombe-die-jeden-moment-explodiert-1.1680571|title="The Room", schlechtester Film aller Zeiten|last=Graff|first=Bernd|website=Süddeutsche.de|date=May 28, 2013 |language=de|access-date=March 18, 2020}}</ref> Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of '']'' called it "the greatest bad movie of our time" and said, "''The Room'' is nearly an anti-film—an inane and unintentionally surreal soap opera, filled with non-sequiturs, confused characters, and gratuitous, anatomically incorrect sex."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/the-disaster-artist-is-a-lousy-tribute-to-the-greatest-1820787988|title=The Disaster Artist is a lousy tribute to the greatest bad movie of our time|last=Vishnevetsky|first=Ignatiy|website=The A.V. Club|date=November 30, 2017 |access-date=January 4, 2019}}</ref> Though the film's star, writer, producer, and director ] has claimed it is a ] and its numerous flaws are intentional, other actors involved in the production have denied this, saying that Wiseau intended it as a ]tic romance.<ref name="Times1">{{cite news |title=Cult hit (Even M is a recycled sex scene) The Room is best worst film |url=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6067024.ece |newspaper= The Times |first=Christopher |last=Goodwin |date=April 12, 2009 |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615143230/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6067024.ece |archive-date=2011-06-15}}</ref> | |||
''The Room'' has been noted for its bizarre and non-sequiturial dialogue, protracted sex scenes, various subplots that are inadequately resolved or simply disappear altogether (most notably, a character announces that she has been diagnosed with ], but this is never mentioned again throughout the entire film), and infamous use of ] for "outdoor" rooftop scenes. It made its broadcast premiere as an ] special in 2009 on ]'s ] block, edited down from its original R rating to a TV-14/DSLV rating; it would prove so popular the network continued to air the film on April 1 as a tradition for several years, to the point the 2012 prank for the network consisted of playing the first few minutes before suddenly cutting off for an unannounced one-night revival of their ] block, with block host T.O.M first greeting the audience as Wiseau's character does, declaring "Oh, hai, Adult Swim". The day after its appearance, its DVD became the top-selling ] on ]. In June 2010, ''The Room'' started playing at the ] ] in ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Siblo |first=Matt |url=http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39009/tommy-wiseau-and-the-room-at-afi-silver-theatre-friday |title=Tommy Wiseau and The Room at AFI Silver Theatre: Friday, June 11 through Sunday, June 13 |newspaper=Washington City Paper |date=June 12, 2010 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=June 28, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628230640/http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39009/tommy-wiseau-and-the-room-at-afi-silver-theatre-friday |url-status=dead }}</ref> '']'' alumni ], ], and ] produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through their site ].com. In 2013, the book '']'', written by ] and ], was published; the book is Sestero's memoir of his involvement in the production of the movie. The book was adapted into the ]-nominated ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNtvTr4hADk|title="Call Me by Your Name" wins Best Adapted Screenplay | 90th Oscars (2018)|date=April 17, 2018 |via=YouTube}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/2018|title=The 90th Academy Awards | 2018|website=Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences|date=April 15, 2019 }}</ref> directed by and starring ] as Wiseau (winning a ] for his performance)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_81Peb7Atc4|title=James Franco Wins Best Actor, Musical or Comedy at the 2018 Golden Globes|date=January 7, 2018 |via=YouTube}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.goldenglobes.com/film/disaster-artist|title=Disaster Artist, The|website=goldenglobes.com}}</ref> and his brother ] as Sestero. A ] starring ] was set to be released in June 2023 to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the film's release, but was delayed. | |||
=== ''Gigli'' (2003) === | |||
{{Main|Gigli{{!}}''Gigli''}} | |||
The ] movie ''Gigli'' features ] and ], with appearances by ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theringer.com/2017/6/19/16039450/the-50-best-good-bad-movies-a9add81b5b7f|title=The 50 Best Good Bad Movies|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|date=June 19, 2017|website=The Ringer}}</ref> ''Gigli'' was originally a ] with no romantic subplot, but the producers demanded script rewrites throughout filming, hoping to cash in on the ] that was then big news in celebrity-watching publications such as '']'' and '']''. This film cost $54 million to make but grossed only $6 million, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time. '']'' gave the film a zero, making ''Gigli'' the lowest-scored film review in the publication's history at that time. '']'' stated that it was "he worst movie—all right, the worst allegedly major movie—of our admittedly young century",<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/01/a-look-back-at-gigli-the-infamous-bennifer-starring-film-on-its-10th-anniversary.html |title=A Look Back at 'Gigli,' the Infamous Bennifer-Starring Film, on Its 10th Anniversary |website=The Daily Beast |date=August 1, 2013 |access-date=September 20, 2013}}</ref> while ] of ] claimed it was "he worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/07/30/gigli-is-up/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921105143/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/07/30/gigli-is-up/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 21, 2013 |title=The 'Gigli' Is Up |publisher=]|date=July 30, 2003 |access-date=September 20, 2013}}</ref> It was also the winner of seven ] (including 2005's Worst "Comedy" of Our First 25 Years),<ref name="twenty-five">{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm |title=Halle's Feline Fiasco Catwoman and President's Fahrenheit Blunders Tie for 25th Razzie Dis-Honors |work=Razzies.com |access-date=March 7, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110315210719/http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/25thWinners.htm |archive-date=March 15, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref> and in 2010 the film was nominated at the ] for "Worst Picture of the Decade".<ref name="30thRazzies"/> It is in Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 worst-reviewed movies of the 2000s,<ref name="rottenworst"/> where it has a 6% rating.<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q260533|title=Gigli}}</ref> ''AfterEllen'' ranked ''Gigli'' number 1 in its list of the worst films of all time.<ref name="afterellen"/> ''Empire'', ''Screen Rant'', and ''Digital Trends'' also listed it as one of the worst films ever made.<ref name="digitaltrends"/><ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/><ref name="Screen Rant"/> | |||
=== ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' (2004) === | |||
{{Main|Sex Lives of the Potato Men{{!}}''Sex Lives of the Potato Men''}} | |||
The 2004 British ] ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' is about the sex lives of a group of potato delivery men in Birmingham. The film received strongly hostile reviews from the British media. Reviews claimed ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' was unfunny, disgusting, and depressing.<ref name="slotpm1">{{Cite web |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012015015/http://news.sky.com/story/248096/critics-pan-worst-film-ever |title=Critics Pan "Worst Film Ever"|work=]|date=February 23, 2004 |archive-date=October 12, 2013 |url=http://news.sky.com/story/248096/critics-pan-worst-film-ever}}</ref> Writing in the '']'', film critic Kevin O'Sullivan called ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' "one of the worst films ever made".<ref>Kevin O'Sullivan, ''The Daily Mirror'', March 5, 2004, (p.14)</ref> Novelist ], in his review for '']'', called ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' "mirthless, worthless, toothless, useless".<ref name="slotpm1"/> '']'' reviewer James Christopher dubbed ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' "one of the two most nauseous films ever made ... a masterclass in film-making ineptitude".<ref name="slotpm1"/> The '']'' film critic, Henry Fitzherbert, also strongly condemned the film: "''Sex Lives'' is so awful it left me slack-jawed in disbelief ... it must be one of the worst British comedies."<ref>Henry Fitzherbert, ''The Sunday Express'', February 22, 2004 (p.67).</ref> Catherine Shoard, in a critique in '']'', stated "It's hard to know what to say to this – it's like finding the right words at a nasty accident ... ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' is probably the lewdest Brit-com since '']'', and certainly the worst." Shoard also described the film as "Less a film than an appetite suppressant."<ref>Catherine Shoard, ''The Sunday Telegraph'', February 22, 2004.</ref> Alan Morrison in the Scottish '']'' described it as "puerile smut of the very worst kind ... ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' should never have been made".<ref>"Review:Sex Lives of the Potato Men''. ''Daily Record'', February 20, 2004.''</ref> '']'' later noted that "''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' attracted some of the worst reviews in living memory."<ref>Donald Clarke, "Out of Office:Interview with Mackenzie Crook". "The Ticket" Magazine, ''The Irish Times'', April 25, 2008, (p.6).</ref> ''The ]'' described ''Sex Lives of the Potato Men'' as "quite possibly the worst film ever made",<ref>Mike Davies, ''The Birmingham Post'', April 24, 2008 (p. 13).</ref> while '']'' stated that the film was "a strong contender for the title of worst film of all time".<ref>Matthew Bell, ''Independent on Sunday'', February 8, 2009, (p. 42).</ref> It was also featured in ''Empire''{{'}}s ''50 Worst Movies Ever'' poll.<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> The film has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 14 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the-sex-lives-of-the-potato-men/ |title=Sex Lives Of The Potato Men on Rotten Tomatoes |website=] |access-date=January 12, 2015}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Catwoman'' (2004) === | |||
{{Main|Catwoman (film){{!}}''Catwoman'' (film)}} | |||
], Germany. Berry would accept the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress for her performance ] where she described the film as a "piece of shit, godawful movie".<ref name="Halle Berry accepts Razzie Award">{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-7s_yeQuDg |title=Halle Berry accepts Razzie Award {{!}} official Razzie YouTube channel}}</ref>]] | |||
Nominally based on ], ''Catwoman'' stars ] as the title character. The film was the result of various rewrites by a total of 28 different screenwriters, though only four were credited after arbitration with the ]. It has a 9% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q115760|title=Catwoman}}</ref> and was declared "arguably the worst superhero film ever made" by the '']''. Jean Lowerison of the '']'' said in her review that ''Catwoman'' "goes on my 'worst' list for the year, and quite possibly for all time".<ref>{{cite web |first=Jean |last=Lowerison |url=http://sandiegometro.archives.whsites.net/reel/index.php?reelID=713 |title='Catwoman' The cat and the Bratt |publisher=San Diego Metropolitan |access-date=January 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110724130824/http://sandiegometro.archives.whsites.net/reel/index.php?reelID=713 |archive-date=July 24, 2011 }}</ref> Sadaf Ahsan of the '']'' went further, calling it the worst movie ever made.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/movies/writer-of-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-agrees-that-it-was-indeed-the-worst-movie-of-all-time |title=Writer of the worst movie of all time agrees that it was, indeed, the worst movie of all time |work=] |last=Ahsan |first=Sadaf |date=February 27, 2018 |access-date=March 19, 2018}}</ref> '']'' summed up reviews of the film under the title "Me-Ouch".<ref>{{cite news |first=Janet |last=Kim |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-07-20/film/me-ouch/1 |title=Me-Ouch – Page 1 – Movies – New York |newspaper=Village Voice |date=July 20, 2004 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629162951/http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-07-20/film/me-ouch/1/ |archive-date=June 29, 2011 }}</ref> The movie was the winner of four ] for Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Director (]) and Worst Screenplay.<ref name="twenty-five"/> Berry arrived at the ceremony to accept her Razzie in person (with her Best Actress ] for '']'' in hand), saying: "First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of shit, god-awful movie ... It was just what my career needed."<ref name="Halle Berry accepts Razzie Award"/> Roger Ebert included it in his "most hated" list,<ref name="eberthated"/> being joined by ''Screen Rant'' and ''Flavorwire'', who also included it in their worst film lists.<ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="Flavorwire"/> | |||
=== ''Daniel – Der Zauberer'' (''Daniel – The Wizard'') (2004) === | |||
{{Main|Daniel – Der Zauberer{{!}}''Daniel – Der Zauberer''}} | |||
The German film ''Daniel – Der Zauberer'' was directed by ] and stars pop singer and ex-'']'' contestant ], who appeared as a fictionalized version of himself. '']'' wrote that it is considered to be the worst German film,<ref name="DailyDot">{{cite web|url=https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/worst-movies-on-imdb/|title=Diving into the worst-rated movies on IMDb|date=December 11, 2015|work=]|access-date=March 14, 2018}}</ref> while ] said it was "possibly the worst movie ever made".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.n-tv.de/leute/Filmemacher-Ulli-Lommel-erliegt-Herzinfarkt-article20165706.html|title=Filmemacher Ulli Lommel erliegt Herzinfarkt|date=December 4, 2017|publisher=]|access-date=March 14, 2018|language=de}}</ref> The website ''filmstarts.de'' states that ''Daniel – Der Zauberer'' was "unbearable for non-fans of Küblböck", adding that "the performances of the actors were some of the worst in the history of German cinema", and alleging that Ulli Lommel and producer Peter Schamoni had "damaged their reputation".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.filmstarts.de/kritiken/37527-Daniel-Der-Zauberer.html |title=Daniel – Der Zauberer – Film 2004 |work=Filmstarts.de |access-date=November 18, 2013}}</ref> Years after its release, Küblböck admitted that, in retrospect, "ou have to say this is the worst movie of all time really".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fr-online.de/wiesbaden/ex-dsds-star-daniel-kueblboeck-ist-jetzt-wiesbadener,1472860,3195326.html|title=Daniel Küblböck ist jetzt Wiesbadener|date=February 15, 2009|work=]|access-date=September 13, 2013|language=de}}</ref> | |||
The film also ], having only 13,834 viewers altogether, which led to it being withdrawn from screening at most cinemas within the first week,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Astinus|first=A. D.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lZxpEAAAQBAJ&q=daniel+der+zauberer+13.834&pg=PT9|title=Die neun schlechtesten Filme der Kinogeschichte: Die ganze Welt der schlechtesten Kinofilme – Von Daniel, der Zauberer bis Kartoffelsalat – Nicht fragen!|date=September 30, 2015|publisher=neobooks|isbn=978-3-7380-4159-0|language=de}}</ref> with '']'' referring to it as a "super-flop".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://rp-online.de/kultur/musik/kueblboeck-als-super-flop_aid-16831093|title=Kinos setzen "Daniel der Zauberer" ab: Küblböck als Super-Flop|website=RP ONLINE|date=September 17, 2004|language=de|access-date=October 4, 2019}}</ref> It is consistently listed at IMDb's Bottom 100 list and became the lowest-rated film at one point.<ref name="NYDN">{{cite web|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/worst-movies-made-gallery-1.3678697|title=The worst movies ever made|last=Lisi|first=Brian|work=]|date=December 5, 2017 |access-date=March 14, 2018}}</ref> ''Total Film'' listed it as the third worst film of all time, after '']'' and the direct-to-video animated ] '']'',<ref name="TotalFilm"/> while ''Fotogramas'' and ''New York Daily News'' included it on their worst film lists.<ref name="NYDN"/><ref name="fotogramas"/> ''Filmstarts.de'' ranked it number 4 in its list of the 25 worst movies ever made,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.filmstarts.de/nachrichten/18494996.html?page=22|title=Die 25 schlechtesten Filme aller Zeitenstarts|work=Filmstarts.de |date=July 31, 2015 |access-date=March 8, 2019}}</ref> and on the German movie rating site '']'', it is the lowest-rated film with an average rating of 0.4/10.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.moviepilot.de/filme/schlechteste|title=Die schlechtesten Filme {{!}} moviepilot.de|website=moviepilot.de|language=de|access-date=March 8, 2019|archive-date=September 11, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180911002428/https://www.moviepilot.de/filme/schlechteste|url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2016, it was showcased on '']'', a German television show featuring the worst film ever made.<ref>{{cite web |title=Schlechteste Filme aller Zeiten - Küblböck-Film läuft im SchleFaZ-Programm |url=https://www.moviepilot.de/news/schlechteste-filme-aller-zeiten-kublbock-film-lauft-im-schlefaz-programm-168856 |website=] |access-date=March 4, 2024 |date=March 23, 2016 |language=de}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2'' (2004) === | |||
{{Main|Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2{{!}}''Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2''}} | |||
The family-oriented comedy ''Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2'' was the last film directed by ] (of '']'' fame) before his death. It is a sequel to the 1999 film '']'' and like its predecessor, it received negative reviews from film critics.<ref name="rt100worst"/> Following the plot of the first film, four babies can communicate with each other using 'baby talk', and have knowledge of many secrets. The "baby geniuses" become involved in a scheme by media mogul Bill Biscane (]), a notorious kidnapper of children, who intends to use a satellite system to brainwash the world's population and force them to watch TV for the rest of their lives. | |||
The film was a box-office bomb, only receiving $9 million from its $20 million budget. '']'' writer B. Alan Orange considers it the worst movie ever made,<ref name="movieweborange"/> '']'' writer Joshua Rivera stated that it was the worst movie he had ever sat through,<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/2015/01/16/popwatch-confessional-worst-kids-movies/|title=PopWatch Confessional: The worst movie a kid has made you sit through|date=January 16, 2015|magazine=]|access-date=April 3, 2018}}</ref> and Tom Long of '']'' said "It is perhaps the most incompetent and least funny comic film ever made."<ref name="dnsb">{{cite news|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700003619/SuperBabies-Baby-Geniuses-2.html|title=SuperBabies: Baby Geniuses 2|last=Long|first=Tom|date=November 17, 2004|work=]|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040559/https://www.deseretnews.com/article/700003619/SuperBabies-Baby-Geniuses-2.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> It was nominated for four Golden Raspberry Awards including Worst Picture, Worst Director (]), Worst Supporting Actor (]) and Worst Screenplay (] (story) & Gregory Poppen).<ref name="dtsb">{{cite news|url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-1-2005_pg9_6|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111023112/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_26-1-2005_pg9_6|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 11, 2013|title='Catwoman' battles President Bush for worst acting prize|date=January 26, 2005|work=Daily Times|access-date=May 3, 2012}}</ref> ''Total Film'' named it the runner-up to '']'' in its list of the worst films ever made,<ref name="TotalFilm"/> and ''Mental Floss'' selected it as the second worst movie ever made after ''Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever''.<ref name="Mental Floss"/> It was ranked as the worst sequel of all time by Rotten Tomatoes and, with a score of 0%, it is included in their list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.<ref name="rt100worst"/><ref>{{cite web |title=50 Worst Sequels of All Time |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/worst-sequels-of-all-time/ |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=January 8, 2022}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Alone in the Dark'' (2005) === | |||
{{Main|Alone in the Dark (2005 film){{!}}''Alone in the Dark'' (2005 film)}} | |||
]'' director ] receiving a rare ] award at the ], where he was described as "Germany's answer to ]".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Brooks |first1=Xan |title=The Love Guru leads Razzie nominations |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/jan/21/love-guru-leads-razzies-nominations |website=] |access-date=December 31, 2024 |date=January 21, 2009}}</ref>]] | |||
Loosely based on a ] by ] and directed by ], the German-Canadian-American film ''Alone in the Dark'' was panned by critics for a multitude of reasons, including poor script and production values, quick cuts to optimize the gory content, almost no connection to the game, and bad acting.<ref name="alonedark">{{Rotten Tomatoes|qid=Q701977|title=Alone in the Dark}}</ref> The movie received a 1% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, was the second worst reviewed movie of the 2000s,<ref name="rottenworst"/> and appears in their top 100 worst-reviewed movies list.<ref name="rt100worst"/> It appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> which they gave a 9/100 to,<ref>{{Citation |title=Alone in the Dark |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/alone-in-the-dark |access-date=March 24, 2022}}</ref> is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list,<ref name="MRQE50"/> and is one of the few films to have received an ] on ].<ref name="CinemaScore">{{cite news |last=Lincoln |first=Kevin |title=What the 19 Movies to Ever Receive an 'F' CinemaScore Have in Common |url=https://www.vulture.com/2017/09/here-are-the-only-19-movies-to-ever-receive-an-f-cinemascore.html |work=] |date=September 20, 2017 |access-date=January 17, 2019}}</ref> | |||
Roger Moore of ''The ]'' stated: "''Alone in the Dark'' shows just how tenuous ''Plan 9 from Outer Space''{{'}}s hold on that 'worst movie ever' title really is."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/movies/orl-db-moviereviews-searchresults,0,3279701,results.formprofile?turbine_cdb_lib__cdb_01_txt=Alone%20in%20the%20Dark&Find+it!=Submit+Query |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629101527/http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/movies/orl-db-moviereviews-searchresults,0,3279701,results.formprofile?turbine_cdb_lib__cdb_01_txt=Alone%20in%20the%20Dark&Find+it!=Submit+Query |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 29, 2011 |title=Alone in the Dark |newspaper=] |date=January 28, 2005 |access-date=June 13, 2014 |first=Roger |last=Moore }}</ref> Likewise, Peter Hartlaub, the '']''{{'s}} pop culture critic, called the film "the best Ed Wood movie ever made ... a film so mind-blowingly horrible that it teeters on the edge of cinematic immortality."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/FILM-CLIPS-Also-opening-today-2702523.php#alone |title=Film Clips / Also opening today |newspaper=] |date=January 28, 2005 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |first=Ruthe |last=Stein}}</ref> In 2009, he named it the worst film of the decade.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/01/MV9A1BAHMM.DTL&type=movies | work=]|title=Decade in review: Hartlaub's movie choices |date=July 30, 2010}}</ref> Jeffrey Lyles of ''The Gazette'' considered it so bad that "other legendary bad films ... await a film of this magnitude because it gets awfully lonely on the island of misfit movies",<ref>{{cite news |url=http://ww2.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2005/200505/entertainment/moviefeat/258216-1.html |title='Dark' is dreary |newspaper=] |date=February 2, 2005 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |archive-date=November 12, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131112020202/http://ww2.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2005/200505/entertainment/moviefeat/258216-1.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> while Scott Nash of ''Three Movie Buffs'' dubbed it "one of the worst movies ever made."<ref name="alonedark"/> | |||
Screenwriter Blair Erickson wrote about his experience dealing with Boll and his original script, which was closer to the actual game itself, and Boll's script change demands on the comedy website '']''.<ref>{{cite news |title = Behind the Scenes: Uwe Boll and Uwe Boll's Alone In the Dark |url = https://somethingawful.com/feature-articles/behind-scenes-uwe/1/ |first= Blair |last= Erickson |date = February 2, 2005 |publisher = Something Awful}}</ref> It received two ] nominations for Worst Director (Uwe Boll) and Worst Actress (]), and won three 2005 ], for Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Special Effects.<ref name="2005stinkers">{{cite web |last=Weinberg |first=Scott |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/news/1646425/2005_stinker_awards_announced |title=2005 Stinker Awards Announced! |website=] |date=March 3, 2006 |access-date=January 17, 2011 |archive-date=December 12, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101212091710/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1646425/2005_stinker_awards_announced/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> ''Empire'', ''Flavorwire'' and ''Screen Rant'' all later included the film on their respective lists for the worst films ever made.<ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="Flavorwire"/><ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> | |||
=== ''Aag'' (2007) === | |||
{{Main|Aag (2007 film){{!}}''Aag'' (2007 film)}} | |||
''Aag'' is a remake of one of the most successful ] films, '']'', directed by ]. ] gave it a zero out of five.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/news/review-rgv-ki-aag-is-rgv-ka-daag/47834-8.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722120747/http://ibnlive.in.com/news/review-rgv-ki-aag-is-rgv-ka-daag/47834-8.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 22, 2009|title=Review: RGV Ki Aag is RGV ka daag}}</ref> '']'' stated that ''Aag'' "destroyed Bollywood's greatest film" and acknowledged that some "consider it the world's worst film".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/A-Decade-of-decadence/articleshow/7195010.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020040304/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-31/news-interviews/28236351_1_rakhi-sawant-salman-khan-vivek-oberoi |url-status=live |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |title=A Decade of decadence |date=December 31, 2010 |newspaper=] |access-date=August 25, 2013}}</ref> '']'' awarded it the "Lifetime's Worst Ever Movie Award".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ram-Gopal-Varma-Ki-Aag/Article1-245543.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111117015847/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ram-Gopal-Varma-Ki-Aag/Article1-245543.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 17, 2011 |title=Review: Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag |newspaper=] |date=August 31, 2007 |access-date=August 25, 2013 }}</ref> It came in first in a '']'' list of the 57 worst movies ever made.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fhmindia.com/57-worst-films-ever-ii/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912012157/http://www.fhmindia.com/57-worst-films-ever-ii/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 12, 2012 |title=57 Worst Films Ever – II |publisher=] |access-date=August 25, 2013 }}</ref> ''Total Film'' included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.<ref name="TotalFilm"/> ], who appeared in the original film and returned for the remake, later admitted that the film was "a mistake".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.digitalspy.com/bollywood/news/a329312/amitabh-bachchan-ram-gopal-varma-ki-aag-a-mistake.html |title= Amitabh Bachchan: 'Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag a mistake' |website=]|date= July 11, 2011 |access-date=August 25, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Epic Movie'' (2007) === | |||
{{Main|Epic Movie{{!}}''Epic Movie''}} | |||
''Epic Movie'' is a ] by ] that mainly parodies ] and ], most notably '']'' and the '']'' films, but also contains references to all kinds of other then-popular films. Like most works of Friedberg and Seltzer, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes,<ref name="rt100worst"/> and a Metacritic score of 17/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{Citation|title=Epic Movie|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/epic-movie|access-date=February 25, 2019| work=] |publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
Harry Fletcher of '']'' said: "Filmmakers and trash-peddlers Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer have been responsible for some of the most pointless, lazy and unforgivable movies of the past decade and frankly, they need to be stopped. '']'', '']'' spoof '']'' and awful '']'' mickey-take '']'' could easily have made this list of the worst movies ever made, but ''Epic Movie'' might be the worst of the lot."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/film/the-12-worst-films-ever-made-a3838756.html|title=The 12 worst films ever made|website=]|last=Fletcher|first=Harry|language=en|date=June 20, 2018|access-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref> Meanwhile, Jamie Russell of the ] called it "the most excruciating, unfunny film you'll see this year... if not your entire lifetime."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/02/05/epic_movie_2007_review.shtml|title=BBC – Movies – review – Epic Movie|last=Russell|first=Jamie|publisher=]|date=February 7, 2007|access-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref> Likewise, Nathan Rabin gave it an F score and said, "''Epic Movie'' strays so far from the solid fundamentals of filmmaking that it calls the very foundation of humor into question."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.avclub.com/epic-movie-1798202359|title=Epic Movie|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|website=]|date=January 29, 2007 |language=en-US|access-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref> | |||
At the ], it received three nominations, for Worst Remake or Rip-off, Worst Screenplay and Worst Supporting Actress (]). It is included in Rotten Tomatoes' list of the 100 Worst Movies of All time,<ref name="rt100worst"/> ''Empire''{{'}}s and ''Flavorwire''{{'}}s lists of the 50 worst movies ever made,<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/><ref name="Flavorwire"/> '']''{{'}}s list of the 12 worst films ever made, MRQE's 50 worst movies list<ref name="MRQE50"/> and '']''{{'}}s list of the 50 worst comedy movies of all time.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newsweek.com/worst-comedy-movies-all-time-ranked-1071735|title=The worst comedy films of all time, from 'Scary Movie 5' to 'The Hottie & the Nottie'|last1=Sim|first1=David|first2=Eve|last2=Watling |date=August 14, 2018|website=Newsweek|language=en|access-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== ''I Know Who Killed Me'' (2007) === | |||
{{Main|I Know Who Killed Me{{!}}''I Know Who Killed Me''}} | |||
''I Know Who Killed Me'' is a ] film directed by ] and starring ] as identical twins, one of whom insists her identity is that of another woman after being abducted by a ]. At the ], it set a record for most awards won in a single year by winning eight awards and it received two further nominations at the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/23/razzie.awards/|title=Lohan's 'Killed Me' sets worst-film record |publisher=]|author=Leopold, Todd|date=February 23, 2008|access-date=February 12, 2019}}</ref> | |||
The '']'' podcast questioned, "Is this the worst movie Lindsay Lohan has ever been in or flat out the worst movie ever?"<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.earwolf.com/episode/i-know-who-killed-me/ |title= I Know Who Killed Me |publisher=]|work=]|date=October 18, 2011|access-date=February 12, 2019}}</ref> ] selected the film as the worst of the 2000s.<ref>{{cite book |first=Croft |last=Ally |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XOMzAgAAQBAJ&q=I+know+who+killed+me+richard+roeper&pg=PT87|title= The Lindsay Lohan Story |publisher=] |year=2012 |isbn=978-1409136378}}</ref> Gabe Delahaye of '']'' reviewed ''I Know Who Killed Me'' as part of his search for the worst movie ever made, writing that: "Out of all the possible Worst Movies of All Time so far, none has been as painful to actually watch as ''I Know Who Killed Me''".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.stereogum.com/1779984/the_hunt_for_the_worst_movie_o_10/vg-loc/videogum/|title=The Hunt For The Worst Movie Of All Time: I Know Who Killed Me|work=]|last=Delahaye|first=Gabe|date=June 23, 2008|access-date=February 12, 2019}}</ref> It was named the 34th worst movie ever made in ''Empire''{{'}}s ''50 Worst Movies Ever'' poll<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> and ''After Ellen'' named it the second worst ever made, after ''Gigli''.<ref name="afterellen"/> MRQE includes it on its 50 Worst Movies list,<ref name="MRQE50"/> and it has a rare F rating on CinemaScore.<ref name="CinemaScore"/> | |||
=== ''Disaster Movie'' (2008) === | |||
{{Main|Disaster Movie{{!}}''Disaster Movie''}} | |||
'']'' is a ] written and directed by ], spoofing films in the ] genre. The film, like most films by Friedberg and Seltzer, received extremely negative reviews and has a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 73 reviews. The site's consensus states: "Returning to their seemingly bottomless well of flatulence humor, racial stereotypes, and stale pop culture gags, Friedberg and Seltzer have produced what is arguably their worst ''Movie'' yet."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/disaster_movie/|title=Disaster Movie – Rotten Tomatoes|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=June 3, 2013}}</ref> It was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as one of the worst-reviewed films of all time.<ref name="rt100worst"/> ] of '']'' stated that "Nothing can convey the grimness of ''Disaster Movie'', which would be the Worst Movie Ever Made were it actually a movie at all."<ref>{{cite news|last=Solomons|first=Jason |author-link=Jason Solomons|title=Disaster Movie|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2008/sep/07/comedy|work=]|access-date=June 3, 2013 |date=September 6, 2008|location=London}}</ref> Adam Tobias of '']'' claimed that "I just don't see how anyone could not find ''Disaster Movie'' one of the worst films of all time." Tobias went on to write that the title was appropriate because the film is "a disaster."<ref>{{cite news|last=Tobias|first=Adam|title=Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time|url=http://www.wdtimes.com/features/screen_scenes/article_a665de71-6454-5ce5-9454-d13b9ad9ee18.html|work=]|access-date=June 3, 2013|date=September 5, 2008}}</ref> It was featured in ''Empire''{{'}}s ''50 Worst Movies Ever'' poll,<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> ''Total Film''{{'}}s ''66 Worst Movies Ever'' list,<ref name="TotalFilm"/> Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list (where it holds a score of 17, the lowest score on the site).<ref name="MRQE50"/> ''Disaster Movie'' also received a rare F rating on CinemaScore.<ref name="CinemaScore"/> The film is also notable for being the motion picture debut of ], whose performance garnered a nomination for ] at the ] alongside five additional nominations.<ref>{{cite news|last=Fleeman|first=Mike|date=January 21, 2009|title=Kim Kardashian: Thanks for the Razzie Nomination!|work=]|url=http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/redcarpet/2009/article/0,,20249205_20254091,00.html|url-status=live|access-date=June 3, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928173450/http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/redcarpet/2009/article/0,,20249205_20254091,00.html|archive-date=September 28, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Meet the Spartans'' (2008) === | |||
{{Main|Meet the Spartans{{!}}''Meet the Spartans''}} | |||
Another 2008 parody movie by ], '']'' mainly parodied the movie '']'', but references to numerous other films as well. Like most Friedberg and Seltzer projects, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus reading: "A tired, unfunny, offensive waste of time, ''Meet the Spartans'' scrapes the bottom of the cinematic barrel.",<ref>{{Cite web |title=Meet the Spartans (2008) |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/meet_the_spartans |access-date=April 17, 2019 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> and a Metacritic score of 9/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Meet the Spartans |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/meet-the-spartans |access-date=April 17, 2019 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> ] of '']'' called it the worst movie he had ever seen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Levin |first=Josh |date=January 30, 2008 |title=Meet the Spartans: another terrible spoof movie from the nongeniuses who brought you Date Movie and Epic Movie. |url=https://slate.com/culture/2008/01/meet-the-spartans-another-terrible-spoof-movie-from-the-nongeniuses-who-brought-you-date-movie-and-epic-movie.html |access-date=March 4, 2019 |website=Slate Magazine |language=en}}</ref> It is included in ''Empire''{{'}}s<ref name="The 50 Worst Movies Ever"/> and ''Flavorwire'''s<ref name="Flavorwire"/> lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, '']''{{'}}s list of the 15 worst films of all time,<ref name=":1"/> Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films<ref name="Metacritic"/> and MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> At the ], it received five nominations, including Worst Picture. | |||
=== ''The Hottie and the Nottie'' (2008) === | |||
{{Main|The Hottie and the Nottie{{!}}''The Hottie and the Nottie''}} | |||
The romantic comedy '']'' starring ], ], ], and ] opened to poor box-office takings and strongly negative reviews with a 5% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hottie_and_the_nottie|title=The Hottie and the Nottie (2008)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=July 12, 2018}}</ref> The British newspaper '']'', reviewing ''The Hottie and the Nottie'', claimed "Paris Hilton is the world's worst actress and she's starring in the worst movie ever made."<ref name="tp">{{cite news|title=The Hottie and the Nottie Review|date=March 23, 2008|newspaper=The People|location=London, England|quote=Disaster Of Paris; Bimbo is worst actress ever}}</ref> Nathan Lee of '']'' called it "crass, shrill, disingenuous, tawdry, mean-spirited, vulgar, idiotic, boring, slapdash, half-assed, and very, very unfunny".<ref>{{cite web |first=Nathan |last=Lee |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-01-29/film/the-hottie-and-the-nottie |title=Village Voice Review |publisher=Villagevoice.com |date=January 29, 2008 |access-date=December 6, 2012 |archive-date=October 30, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121030093726/http://www.villagevoice.com/2008-01-29/film/the-hottie-and-the-nottie/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Online film critic ] described the film's comedy as "about as funny as the anal ] scene in '']''".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reelviews.net/movies/h/hottie_nottie.html |title=James Berardinelli review |publisher=Reelviews.net |date=May 13, 2007 |access-date=December 6, 2012}}</ref> ] called it "excruciatingly, painfully, horribly, terribly awful", and argued that "nobody in this movie really should have a career in movies".<ref name="thatn">{{cite web |url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/hottie_and_the_nottie/ |website=Rotten Tomatoes |title=The Hottie and The Nottie |access-date=October 25, 2014 }}</ref> Connie Ogle in the '']'' described ''The Hottie and the Nottie'' thus: "Imagine the worst movie you've ever seen. Got it? Now try to think of something worse. That something is this movie – wretched, embarrassing and a waste of the time and energy of everyone involved."<ref name="thatn"/> The film appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,<ref name="Metacritic"/> and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> | |||
=== ''Álom.net'' (2009) === | |||
{{main|Álom.net{{!}}''Álom.net''}} | |||
''Álom.net'' (also known as ''Dream Well'' or ''Dream.net'') is a Hungarian film that emulates tropes found in American ]s. '']'' wrote that it is "the worst movie of all time, and that's why it became a ]".<ref>{{cite web |title=A Rohadt Kritikusok szerint a Pappa Pia túltolta a fostalicskát |url=https://444.hu/2017/08/20/a-rohadt-kritikusok-szerint-a-pappa-pia-tultolta-a-fostalicskat |website=] |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=August 20, 2017}}</ref> Furthermore, '']'' and '']'' each named it the worst Hungarian film ever made and '']'' reported its status as "the worst film of all time" when it became the lowest-rated film on IMDb.<ref>{{cite web |title=10 éves az Álom.net, amivel Steiner Kristóf "görbe tükröt akart mutatni az akkori generációnak" |url=https://24.hu/szorakozas/2019/04/16/steiner-kristof-alom-net-labancz-lilla-iszak-eszter/ |website=] |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=April 16, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Dávid |first=Sajó |title=Készül a folytatás minden idők legrosszabb magyar filmjéhez |url=https://index.hu/kultur/cinematrix/2014/11/26/keszul_a_folytatas_minden_idok_legrosszabb_magyar_filmjehez/ |website=] |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu |date=November 26, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Clarke |first=Donald |title=What's the worst film of all time? |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/screenwriter/2011/04/19/whats-the-worst-film-of-all-time/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120203074651/https://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/screenwriter/2011/04/19/whats-the-worst-film-of-all-time/ |newspaper=] |date=April 19, 2011 |access-date=February 1, 2022 |archive-date=February 3, 2012}}</ref> ''Total Film'' named it the fourth worst film ever made and ''FMC.hu'' included it on their list of the ten worst films ever made.<ref name="TotalFilm"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Minden idők tíz legrosszabb filmje |url=https://fmc.hu/2019/11/02/minden-idok-tiz-legrosszabb-filmje |website=fmc.hu |access-date=February 1, 2022 |language=hu}}</ref> | |||
== 2010s == | |||
=== ''Birdemic: Shock and Terror'' (2010) === | |||
{{Main|Birdemic: Shock and Terror{{!}}''Birdemic: Shock and Terror''}} | |||
], ], and ] during the live ] treatment of ]]] | |||
An independently produced film that is an apparent homage to ]'s '']'', ''Birdemic: Shock and Terror'' tells the story of a romance between the two leading characters, played by Alan Bagh and Whitney Moore, as their small town is attacked by birds. Written, directed, and produced by ], it was intended as a "romantic thriller"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2010/02/12/james-nguyens-birdemic-is-the-new-best-worst-movie-ever/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120914135451/http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2010/02/12/james-nguyens-birdemic-is-the-new-best-worst-movie-ever/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 14, 2012 |title=Birdemic Has Romance and Suspense and All That |publisher=Viceland Today |date=February 12, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}}</ref> but is notable due to its poor quality, with reviewers calling out its wooden acting, bad dialogue, amateurish sound and editing, nonsensical plot and, in particular, its special effects, consisting primarily of poorly rendered computer generated eagles and vultures that perform physically awkward aerial maneuvers and explode upon impact with the ground.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbr.com/birdemic-makes-crows-have-eyes-3-masterpiece/|title=Birdemic Makes The Crows Have Eyes 3 Look Like a Hitchcock Masterpiece|first=Ethan|last=Parker|date=October 30, 2020|website=CBR}}</ref> | |||
The film, which cost $10,000 to make,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8604858.stm |title=Is Birdemic worst film ever made? |work=BBC News |date=April 6, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}}</ref> was called by the '']'' "truly, one of the worst films ever made"<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/review-embirdemic-shock-a_b_491140|first=Fabio|last=Periera |title=Review: Birdemic: Shock and Terror |work=HuffPost |date=March 9, 2010 |access-date=December 3, 2019}}</ref> and by '']'' as "one more in the pantheon of beloved trash-terpieces".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-03-30/film/birdemic-shock-and-terror-one-more-for-the-trash-terpiece-heap/ |title=Birdemic: Shock and Terror, One More for the Trash-terpiece Heap |newspaper=The Village Voice |date=March 30, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110320100812/http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-03-30/film/birdemic-shock-and-terror-one-more-for-the-trash-terpiece-heap/ |archive-date=March 20, 2011 }}</ref> '']'' ranked it number 1 in its list of the 50 worst films ever made.<ref name="Flavorwire"/> '']'' deemed it among the worst movies ever made,<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2249870/pagenum/all/#p2 |title=The Worst Movies Ever Made |magazine=Slate |last=Weiner|first=Jonah|date=April 6, 2010 |access-date=April 16, 2011}}</ref> while '']'' referred to it as "a cult hit among bad-movie fans"<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/02/25/birdemic_review |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110228043216/http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/02/25/birdemic_review |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 28, 2011 |title="Birdemic": The magic of atrocious CGI, confirmed |work=Salon |date=February 25, 2011 |access-date=May 6, 2011 }}</ref> and '']'' stated that the film displayed "all the revered hallmarks of hilariously bad filmmaking".<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://variety.com/review/VE1117942491?refcatid=31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629203625/https://variety.com/review/VE1117942491?refcatid=31 |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 29, 2011 |title=Variety Reviews – Birdemic: Shock and Terror |magazine=Variety |date=March 29, 2010 |access-date=May 6, 2011 |first=Ronnie |last=Scheib}}</ref> Following the home media release of ''Birdemic'', ], ], and ] of '']'' fame produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through ]. They later riffed upon the film again theatrically.<ref>{{cite web|author=eas106 |url=http://www.fandango.com/rifftraxlive:birdemic_157390/movieoverview |title=RiffTrax Live: Birdemic (2012) Movie Tickets, Reviews, and Photos |work=Fandango.com |date=October 25, 2012 |access-date=November 18, 2013}}</ref> In response to the cult status of the first film, a sequel—'']''—was released in 2013, and included many returning members of the cast and crew.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/film-review-birdemic-2-the-resurrection-1200424321/|title=Film Review: 'Birdemic 2: The Resurrection'|first=Dennis|last=Harvey|date=April 29, 2013}}</ref> Another sequel was released on several streaming platforms on January 24, 2023 titled ''Birdemic: Sea Eagle''. | |||
=== ''The Last Airbender'' (2010) === | |||
{{Main|The Last Airbender (film){{!}}''The Last Airbender'' (film)}} | |||
''The Last Airbender'' is a fantasy adventure film written, produced, and directed by ]<ref name="terrible10"/> and is based on the ] animated TV series '']''.<ref name="negativeten"/> Upon release, the film was widely panned with critics pointing out the bad acting, numerous ]s, screenplay, dialogue, poor special effects (despite its reported $150 million budget), and especially Shyamalan's directing. It was also ridiculed for the poor quality of its ], and the casting of white and Indian actors to portray characters who were interpreted as East Asian or ] in the source material triggered accusations of racism and ].<ref>{{cite news|first=Graeme|last=McMillan|title=Avatar Casting Makes Fans See... White|access-date=December 19, 2008|date=December 17, 2008|url=http://io9.com/5111680/avatar-casting-makes-fans-see-white| work=]|publisher=]}}</ref> Further criticism came from fans of the original cartoon series, who said the film differed tremendously from its critically acclaimed source material. David Onda of ] wrote that it "has been called one of the worst ever made. The movie was universally panned by critics and failed to make back its production budget domestically."<ref>{{cite web|last=Onda|first=David|title=The Last Airbender|url=http://xfinity.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-franchiseflops/10/|publisher=]|access-date=December 22, 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131224104351/http://xfinity.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-franchiseflops/10/|archive-date=December 24, 2013}}</ref> Roger Ebert wrote, "''The Last Airbender'' is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that."<ref>{{cite web|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=The Last Airbender|url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-airbender-2010|work=]|access-date=December 22, 2013}}</ref> When asked if ''Last Airbender'' had been the worst film he has ever seen, Mike Ryan of '']'' answered, "Yes."<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Ryan|first=Mike|title=25 Questions You May Have About The Last Airbender|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2010/07/25-questions-you-may-have-about-the-last-airbender|magazine=]|date=July 1, 2010|access-date=December 22, 2013}}</ref> | |||
It garnered nine nominations at the ], and won five, including Worst Picture and Worst Director.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12589752 |publisher=] |date= February 27, 2011 |title=M Night Shyamalan's Last Airbender wins Razzie Awards |access-date=February 27, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The 31st Annual Razzie Awards|url=http://razzies.com/history/11winners.asp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130103033553/http://razzies.com/history/11winners.asp|publisher=]|archive-date=January 3, 2013}}</ref> '']'' highlighted the film in their "Worst Films Ever" series,<ref>{{cite web|last=Wilson|first=Natasha|title=The Worst Films Ever: The Last Airbender|url=http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/08/the-worst-films-ever-the-last-airbender/|website=]|access-date=June 29, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808051629/http://www.hihimag.com/hi/ents/film/2013/08/the-worst-films-ever-the-last-airbender/|archive-date=August 8, 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> and Rotten Tomatoes, ''Screen Rant'' and ''Digital Trends'' included it in their worst film lists.<ref name="rt100worst"/><ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="digitaltrends"/> ] would later express regret and dislike for his role and his experience with the film. He described his performance as Prince Zuko as being as though he "saw a stranger on the screen that I couldn't relate to."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/dev-patel-regretting-last-airbender-i-saw-a-stranger-screen-951544 |title=Dev Patel on Regretting 'Last Airbender': I "Saw a Stranger on the Screen" |last=Couch |first=Aaron |date=December 1, 2016 |website=] |access-date=December 1, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161202113203/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/dev-patel-regretting-last-airbender-i-saw-a-stranger-screen-951544 |archive-date=December 2, 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YyQGKSzYqBg|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/YyQGKSzYqBg|archive-date=October 28, 2021|title=THR Full Oscar Actor's Roundtable: Andrew Garfield, Casey Affleck, Dev Patel, & More|date=January 23, 2017|via=]|language=en|access-date=January 23, 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star'' (2011) === | |||
{{Main|Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star{{!}}''Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star''}} | |||
''Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star'' was produced by ]'s ] and featured ] in the titular role as a small-town manchild who pursues a career in the ] industry after learning that his parents were ]s in the 1970s. On Rotten Tomatoes, ''Bucky Larson'' has a 3% rating, and it appears on the site's list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.<ref name="rt100worst"/> Linda Cook of the '']'' described the film as "the worst of the worst",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://qctimes.com/entertainment/columnists/linda-cook/bucky-is-the-worst-of-the-worst/article_77c4eeea-dd6b-11e0-93fe-001cc4c03286.html|title='Bucky' is the worst of the worst|newspaper=]|last=Cook|first=Linda|date=September 12, 2011|access-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref> while '']'' critic Matt Singer picked it as the worst film ever made.<ref name="newsgazette">{{cite web |last=D'Alessio |first=Jeff |title=Top critics: The worst film I ever reviewed |url=https://www.news-gazette.com/arts-entertainment/top-critics-the-worst-film-i-ever-reviewed/article_9453df47-e504-5609-aeab-ba37a1aba2cf.html |website=] |access-date=June 11, 2023 |language=en |date=April 16, 2023}}</ref> Jim Vorel of ''Paste'''s ''Bad Movie Diaries'' column suggested that ''Bucky Larson'' was the worst film covered by the column.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bad Movie Diaries: Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011) |url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/bad-movie-diaries/bad-movie-diaries-bucky-larson-born-to-be-a-star-2/ |language=en |date=August 30, 2018|access-date=July 12, 2022|last1=Lowe |first1=Kenneth |last2=Vorel |first2=Jim |website=] }}</ref> In listing it as one of the ten worst comedies ever, ] stated that ''Bucky Larson'' was "a badness the world had forgotten was capable of existing".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theblot.com/10-worst-film-comedies-ever-made-7720429|title=The 10 worst comedies ever made|last=Musto|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Musto|work=The Blot Magazine|date=June 12, 2014|access-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref> ''Screen Rant'' included it in its list of the 25 worst movies in film history and ''Mental Floss'' named it the fifth worst movie ever.<ref name="Screen Rant">{{cite news|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-list-all-time/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811144052/https://screenrant.com/worst-movies-list-all-time/|title=25 Worst Movies in Film History|last=Kendrick|first=Ben|work=]|date=November 13, 2015|access-date=August 11, 2017|archive-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref><ref name="Mental Floss">{{cite news|url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/503248/15-worst-movies-ever-made|title=The 15 Worst Movies Ever Made|last=Wood|first=Jennifer M|work=]|date=August 10, 2017|access-date=August 11, 2017}}</ref> ''Bucky Larson'' also appears on MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list,<ref name="MRQE50"/> and Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.<ref name="Metacritic"/> The film earned six nominations at the ], but lost in every category to '']'', which was also produced by Happy Madison Productions.<ref name="RazzieWin"/> | |||
=== ''Jack and Jill'' (2011) === | |||
{{Main|Jack and Jill (2011 film){{!}}''Jack and Jill'' (2011 film)}} | |||
] starred in '']'' and '']''. He also produced these films, as well as '']'' and '']''.]] | |||
''Jack and Jill'' is a comedy film starring ] as Jack, a commercial director, who is visited by his "identical" twin sister, Jill (played by Sandler, in ]),<ref name="negativeten"/> during the holidays. '']'' stated that ''Jack and Jill'' "received some of the worst reviews of any movie ever" upon its release.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/2011/11/14/the_tragedy_of_adam_sandler/|title=The tragedy of Adam Sandler|work= ] |last=Eggers|first=Toph|date=November 14, 2011|access-date=August 23, 2013}}</ref> In the film, Jill is wooed by ], whom Jack wants to be in his ] commercial. ] of the '']'' noted the irony of Pacino's presence, as the actor is best known for playing ] in '']'', which is widely considered ], in this film, which he called "one of the worst movies in the history of cinema!"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.richardroeper.com/reviews/footlooselikecrazyandjackandjill.aspx|title=Footloose, Like Crazy, and Jack and Jill|publisher=Richard Roeper & The Movies|last=Roeper|first=Richard|access-date=April 25, 2013}}</ref> Ramin Setoodeh of '']'' and ] of '']'' reviewed it together in an article entitled "Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/11/movie-review-adam-sandler-s-jack-and-jill-is-the-worst-movie-ever-made.html|title=Movie Review: Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made|website=The Daily Beast|last=Setoodeh|first=Ramin|date=November 11, 2011|access-date=April 25, 2013}}</ref> After an hour-long critique, ] claimed that it was "so egregious that it ceased to be a film", and the site also later called it "the worst thing in the world".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill/|title=Half in the Bag: Jack and Jill|publisher=RedLetterMedia|author=Mike Stoklasa, Jay Bauman|date=November 20, 2011|access-date=April 25, 2013|archive-date=January 23, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200123031718/http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag-jack-and-jill-1-of-2/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Mike McGranaghan wrote, on his website ''The Aisle Seat'': "'']'', '']'', '']'', '']''. What do they all have in common? They're all widely considered among the worst big studio movies ever made. You know what else they have in common? They're all better than ''Jack and Jill''."<ref name="JackandJill">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jack_and_jill_2011|title=Jack and Jill (2011)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=June 10, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://aisleseat.com/jackandjill.htm |title=Jack and Jill |publisher=The Aisle Seat |last=McGranaghan|first=Mike|date=November 1, 2011 |access-date=November 18, 2013}}</ref> ''Jack and Jill'' won a record 10 awards at the ], sweeping every category. It broke the record previously held by '']'' for having the most Razzies earned by a single film and is the only film to win every possible award.<ref name=RazzieWin>{{cite news |title=Adam Sandler movie Jack and Jill sweeps Razzie awards |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17582458 |work=] |date=April 2, 2012 |access-date=May 17, 2012}}</ref> The film holds a 3% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, where it ranks as being one of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.<ref name="rt100worst"/> ''Vanity Fair'' and ''Screen Rant'' have also included it on their respective worst film lists.<ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="italianvanity"/> | |||
=== ''That's My Boy'' (2012) === | |||
{{Main|That's My Boy (2012 film){{!}}''That's My Boy'' (2012 film)}} | |||
Another comedy film starring Adam Sandler, ''That's My Boy'' concerns a middle school student named Donny Berger who has sex with his teacher, gets her pregnant, and in turn, earns a lifestyle of a minor celebrity, something he never intended to happen. Years later, Donny (played by Sandler) crashes his now-adult son's (]) wedding and bachelor party to get money to pay his taxes, therefore avoiding prison. The film has been widely panned due to its comedic portrayal of ], ], ], and ],<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/comedy-about-middle-school-statutory-rape-does-adam-sandlers-thats-my-boy-go-too-far/|title=Comedy about middle school statutory rape? Does Adam Sandler's ''That's My Boy'' go too far?|last=McKay|first=Hollie|date=April 30, 2012|access-date=April 17, 2019|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/05/21/is-adam-sandler-serious-with-thats-my-boy/ |title=Is Adam Sandler Serious With That's My Boy? | DrJays.com Live | Fashion. Music. Lifestyle |work=Live.drjays.com |date=May 21, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131212060031/http://live.drjays.com/index.php/2012/05/21/is-adam-sandler-serious-with-thats-my-boy/ |archive-date=December 12, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ncfm.org/2012/05/news/discrimination-against-men-news/adam-sandlers-new-movie-thats-my-boy-exploits-child-victims-of-sexual-assault-please-boycott-the-movie/ |title=Adam Sandler's new movie ''That's My Boy'' exploits child victims of sexual assault. Please boycott the movie. | National Coalition For Men |date=May 2, 2012 |publisher=NCFM |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> with film critic Andrew O'Hehir of ''Salon'' stating, " new movie about a rape survivor and his estranged son is supposed to be funny, but radiates pain and rage."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.salon.com/2012/06/16/sympathy_for_adam_sandler/ |title=Adam Sandler hates you |work=Salon.com |date=June 16, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> ] of the '']'' proclaimed, "To say ''That's My Boy'' is one of the worst movies of the year is to insult 2012. This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/movies/13146305-421/pervs-will-be-pervs-in-thats-my-boy.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120617062159/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/movies/13146305-421/pervs-will-be-pervs-in-thats-my-boy.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 17, 2012 |title=Pervs will be pervs in ''That's My Boy'' – Chicago Sun-Times |work=Suntimes.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 }}</ref> while Richard Haridly of '']'' called it "one of the saddest and most exhausting" films he has ever seen.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.quickflix.com.au/news/reviews/thatsmyboy |title=That's My Boy review by Richard Haridy |publisher=Quickflix |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> MaryAnn Johanson of ''Flick Filosopher'' outright panned the film for its inability to generate laughs as well as its depraved content, calling it "a disgusting excuse for a comedy" and possibly "the most repulsive movie I've ever seen",<ref name="myboy">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thats_my_boy/reviews/|title=That's My Boy – Movie Reviews|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.flickfilosopher.com/2013/01/thats-my-boy-review.html |title=That's My Boy (review) |work=FlickFilosopher.com |date=January 23, 2013 |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> and Jonathan Lack of ''We Got This Covered'' declared, "''That's My Boy'' isn't just the worst film of 2012, it's one of the most morally reprehensible comedies of all time, a disgusting movie you should stay far, far away from."<ref name="myboy"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/boy-review/|title=That's My Boy Review|last=Lack|first=Jonathan R.|date=June 15, 2012|work=Wegotthiscovered.com|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> Furthermore, Ed Whitfield of ''The Ooh Tray'' stated, "It may be the worst film, in any genre, ever made".<ref name="myboy"/><ref>{{cite web|author=The Ooh Tray |url=http://www.theoohtray.com/2012/09/09/film-review-thats-my-boy/ |title=Film Review: That's My Boy |publisher=The Ooh Tray |date=October 2, 2012 |access-date=December 19, 2013}}</ref> In addition to the movie's overwhelmingly negative reviews, ''That's My Boy'' earned eight nominations at the ], such as Worst Picture and Worst Director, and won the awards for Worst Actor (Sandler) and Worst Screenplay.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/history/13winners.asp |title=Razzie Winners |work=Razzies.com |access-date=December 19, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130227010807/http://www.razzies.com/history/13winners.asp |archive-date=February 27, 2013 }}</ref> It holds a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes {{as of|2019|April|17|lc=y|df=US}} based on 115 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thats_my_boy_2012|title=That's My Boy|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Foodfight!'' (2012) === | |||
{{main|Foodfight!{{!}}''Foodfight!''}} | |||
The animated comedy '']'', directed by ], features a cast of celebrity ]s, including ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/the-100-best-b-movies-of-all-time/|title=The 100 Best "B Movies" of All Time|date=May 8, 2014|website=pastemagazine.com|access-date=June 29, 2022|archive-date=June 24, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624040038/https://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2014/05/the-100-best-b-movies-of-all-time.html?a=1|url-status=dead}}</ref> The film revolves around brand ]s, known as "Ikes", who come to life in a supermarket after closing time, and their struggles against the forces of Brand X. Several actual corporate mascots make cameos in the movie, such as ], ], and the ]. Development for the movie began as early as 2000, but troubled production, including an incident where the hard drives had supposedly been stolen, and financial difficulties delayed its release several times.<ref name="telegraphfoodfight"/> The film eventually received a limited theatrical release in Europe in 2012,<ref name="rabinfoodfight"/> and it became a ], earning just $74,000 against its reported $65 million budget.<ref name="srfood">{{cite web|last=Sherlock|first=Ben|date=June 30, 2020|title=The 5 Best (& 5 Worst) Animated Movies From The 2010s|url=https://screenrant.com/best-worst-animatedmovies-2010s-pixar-toy-story-coco-emoji/|access-date=January 7, 2020|work=]|quote=With a reported budget of $65 million and a box office gross of less than $74,000, Foodfight! was a devastating financial catastrophe, and it's since been branded one of the worst movies ever made.}}</ref> ''Foodfight!'' was also critically panned for its animation, humor, use of ] as a central theme (and being aimed towards children), and content inappropriate for its target audience, such as ] and references to ].<ref name="telegraphfoodfight"/> | |||
A '']'' article condemned the film, saying: "The animation appears unfinished ... And the plot ... is impenetrable and even offensive." The article also reported that ''Foodfight!'' had been "seized upon by Internet purveyors of bad cinema".<ref>{{cite web |last=Rossen |first=Jake |title=Placing Products? Try Casting Them |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/movies/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-computer-animated-foodfight.html |work=] |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date=August 9, 2013}}</ref> One such Internet critic was Nathan Rabin of '']'', who included the film in his ''My World of Flops'' column, describing it as "one of those fall-of-civilization moments" and "This is the kind of movie so unbelievably, surreally and exquisitely terrible that you want to share it with the rest of the world. I was put on earth to suffer through abominations like ''Foodfight!'' so that society as a whole might benefit from my Christ-like sacrifice."<ref name="rabinfoodfight">{{Cite web|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|date=February 27, 2013|title=Supermarket Brands Sponsored Case File #34: ''Foodfight!''|url=https://www.avclub.com/supermarket-brands-sponsored-case-file-34-foodfight-1798236586|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826092349/https://film.avclub.com/supermarket-brands-sponsored-case-file-34-foodfight-1798236586|archive-date=August 26, 2017|access-date=January 7, 2022|website=The A.V. Club}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Rabin|first=Nathan|author-link=Nathan Rabin|date=February 12, 2019|title=This Looks Terrible! Foodfight! (2012)|work=nathanrabin.com|url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/2/12/this-looks-terrible-foodfight-2012|access-date=January 7, 2022}}</ref> Meanwhile, a review in '']'' described it as "'']'', rendered in horribly sharp polygons" and ''Hollywood News'' called it "by far the crappiest piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune to watch".<ref>{{cite web|last=Nicholson|first=Tom|date=June 10, 2020|title=The Best Movies To Watch While Very, Very Stoned|url=https://www.esquire.com/uk/culture/film/a21726330/best-stoner-movies/|access-date=January 7, 2022|work=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Foodfight! Review |url=http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2012/10/25/foodfight-review/|website=Hollywood News|access-date=January 7, 2022|date=October 25, 2012}}</ref> Likewise, critic Tim Brayton described it as "the absolute ugliest animated feature that has ever been released by something resembling an actual animation studio ... one of the very worst movies I have ever seen."<ref>{{cite news|title=Foodfight! (2012)|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/foodfight/|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=January 7, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Brayton |first=Tim |title=Foodfight! (2012) – Movie Review |url=https://www.alternateending.com/2015/04/dont-play-with-your-food.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220107083052/https://www.alternateending.com/2015/04/dont-play-with-your-food.html |website=Alternate Ending |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date= April 24, 2015 |archive-date=January 7, 2022}}</ref> In 2024, '']'' described it as the "absolute worst of the 21st century, without any real competition."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pacheco |first1=Diego Pineda |title=The 10 Worst Fantasy Movies of the 2010s, Ranked |url=https://collider.com/worst-fantasy-movies-2010s-ranked/ |website=] |access-date=December 1, 2024 |language=en |date=November 27, 2024}}</ref> '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and ] have since included ''Foodfight!'' in their worst film lists.<ref name="digitaltrends"/><ref name="timeoutlist"/><ref name="fotogramas"/><ref name="mental floss10">{{cite web |title=10 Really Bad Movies that Define "Bad Movies" |url=https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/12464/10-really-bad-movies-define-bad-movies |website=] |access-date=July 21, 2022 |date=September 6, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Charlebois|first=Mathieu|date=November 29, 2018|title=The worst movies of all time|url=https://www.msn.com/en-ph/entertainment/entertainmentmovies/the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ss-BBQh1D2#image=6|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220106083744/https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/movies/the-worst-movies-of-all-time/ss-AAQm4Hw#image=6|access-date=January 7, 2022|archive-date=January 6, 2022|publisher=]}}</ref> Rebecca Hawkes of '']'' described ''Foodfight!'' as "the worst animated children's film ever made",<ref name="telegraphfoodfight">{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/forget-emoji-movie-discover-foodfight-worst-childrens-animation/|title=Forget The Emoji Movie: discover Foodfight!, the worst children's animation of all time|last=Hawkes|first=Rebecca|date=August 2, 2017|work=]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180624030309/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/forget-emoji-movie-discover-foodfight-worst-childrens-animation/|archive-date=June 24, 2018|url-status=live|access-date=January 7, 2022}}</ref> while '']'', '']'' and '']'' have each described it as being one of the worst animated films ever made.<ref>{{cite news|first=Greg|last=Ehrbar|date=May 8, 2013|title=DVD REVIEW: "FoodFight!"|publisher=]|url=http://blogs.indiewire.com/animationscoop/dvd-review-foodfight-2003|access-date=January 7, 2022}}</ref><ref name="screenrantanimated">{{cite web|date=January 15, 2017|title=12 Worst Animated Movies of All Time|url=http://screenrant.com/worst-animated-movies-all-time/|access-date=January 7, 2022|work=]|archive-date=January 8, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108225848/https://screenrant.com/worst-animated-movies-all-time/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Venegas |first=Jasmine |title=10 Movies With Less-Than-Subtle Advertisements |url=https://www.cbr.com/movies-with-obvious-advertisements-ads/ |publisher=] |access-date=January 7, 2022 |date=August 18, 2021}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Run for Your Wife'' (2012) === | |||
{{Main|Run for Your Wife (2012 film){{!}}''Run for Your Wife'' (2012 film)}} | |||
A British comedy film based on ], ''Run for Your Wife'' starred ] as John Smith, a bigamist, and ] and ] as his wives. ''Run for Your Wife'' was directed by the author of the play, ] (who also makes an uncredited cameo appearance). Upon release, ''Run for Your Wife'' was savaged by film critics, with the South African newspaper ''Daily News'' saying "''Run for Your Wife'' could be the worst film in history",<ref>"Movie may be the biggest Turkey ever", ''Daily News'', South Africa, February 21, 2013.</ref> the ] website reporting that "Some writers are making the case that the British comedy may be 'the worst film ever{{'"}},<ref name="studiobriefing">{{Cite web |url=http://www.studiobriefing.net/2013/02/the-worst-film-in-history/#sthash.xFKOr9e6.dpuf |title=The Worst Film in History? |work=Studio Briefing |date=February 21, 2013 |access-date=February 13, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130226120418/http://www.studiobriefing.net/2013/02/the-worst-film-in-history/ |archive-date=2013-02-26}}</ref> and '']'' claiming ''Run for Your Wife'' "was branded the worst British film ever".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Drake |first=Matthew |date=2013-10-06 |title=Danny Dyer's film company went bust with debt to taxpayer of £25,000 |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/danny-dyers-film-company-old-2343670 |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Mirror |language=en}}</ref> ''Run for Your Wife'' met with such overwhelmingly negative reviews upon release that the reviews themselves were widely reported in the UK media.<ref name="studiobriefing"/><ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-02-16 |title='Run for Your Wife' - Is this the worst movie ever filmed? |url=https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/-run-for-your-wife----is-this-the-worst-movie-ever-filmed--114048296.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=uk.movies.yahoo.com |language=en-GB}}</ref> The film was variously described as "a catastrophe", "as funny as leprosy" and "30 years past its sell-by-date", with '']'' reviewer ] saying that it "makes '']'' look edgy and contemporary".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bradshaw |first=Peter |date=2013-02-14 |title=Run for Your Wife – review |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/feb/14/run-for-your-wife-review |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> '']'s'' Anthony Quinn wrote, "The stage play ran for nine years – it will be lucky to run for nine days. Perhaps never in the field of light entertainment have so many actors sacrificed so much dignity in the cause of so few jokes ... From the look of it, Cooney hasn't been in a cinema for about 30 years".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-02-15 |title=Film review: Run for Your Wife (12A) |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/film-review-run-for-your-wife-12a-8495806.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The cast featured numerous British celebrities in cameo roles, which was commented upon by several reviewers. The '']'' commented that "no one emerges unscathed among the cameo-packed cast that reads largely like a roll-call for Brit TV legends you'd previously suspected deceased".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/run-for-your-wife-as-funny-as-leprosy-8496873.html |title=Run for Your Wife – 'As funny as leprosy' |work=The Independent (London) |date=January 30, 2015}}</ref> The '']'' described the film as "an exasperating farce containing not one single, solitary laugh. {{sic|Comprised|hide=y| of}} people losing their trousers and falling over, the film looks like a pilot for a (mercifully) never-commissioned 70s sitcom".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=David |date=2013-02-15 |title=Movie Review: Run for your wife (12A) |url=http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/movies/movie-dvd-reviews/movie-review-run-your-wife-1711076 |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=Daily Record |language=en}}</ref> An article in the ''Independent'' described ''Run for Your Wife'' (along with the similarly panned '']'') as contenders for the title of the "worst film in history".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-02-15 |title=Run For Your Wife: Is this movie the biggest turkey ever filmed? |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/run-for-your-wife-is-this-movie-the-biggest-turkey-ever-filmed-8497478.html |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> '']'' reported "critics have been queuing up to batter recent release ''Run for Your Wife'', with general agreement that it ranks among the worst British comedies of all time".<ref>"Run for Your Wife", ''Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette'', March 11, 2013.</ref> ''Run for Your Wife'' was also a ], earning only £602 in its opening weekend at the British box office to its £900,000 budget.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Danny Dyer's Run For Your Wife takes just £602 at the box office |url=https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/comedy/danny-dyers-run-for-your-wife-takes-just-602-at-the-box-office/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |website=Radio Times |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a460182/danny-dyers-run-for-your-wife-flops-with-gbp602-at-the-box-office.html |title=Danny Dyer's 'Run For Your Wife' flops with £747 at the box office | website=Digital Spy|date=February 20, 2013 |access-date=January 30, 2015}}</ref> ''Run for Your Wife'' has a 0% rating on ] {{as of|2015|July|29|lc=y|df=US}} based on 15 reviews.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/run_for_your_wife_2013/|title=Run For Your Wife (2013)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Fateful Findings'' (2012) === | |||
{{Main|Fateful Findings{{!}}''Fateful Findings''}} | |||
''Fateful Findings'' is a 2012 independent ] written, directed and produced by ]. Breen also starred in the film and took on most of the crew roles, including film editor, sound editor, accountant, caterer, set designer, wardrobe, makeup and casting.<ref name="NYDN"/> The film follows an author-turned-hacker with supernatural powers who uses his abilities to reveal vague "government and corporate secrets", while beset by numerous relationship dramas, and ends with an extended sequence at a press conference where politicians and businesspeople confess to corruption and kill themselves before an applauding crowd. | |||
Writing for '']'', reviewer Mike Hodges described it as "the worst movie ever made", comparing it unfavorably to '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222032832/https://filmthreat.com/reviews/66453/|url=https://filmthreat.com/reviews/66453/|first=Mike|last=Hodges|website=]|date=May 27, 2013|archive-date=February 22, 2014|access-date=February 1, 2018|url-status=dead|title=Fateful Findings}}</ref> Nathan Rabin, writing for Rotten Tomatoes, said ''Fateful Findings'' threatens ''The Room''{{'}}s position as "best worst movie",<ref>{{cite web|url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/why-fateful-findings-deserves-cult-status/|title=Why Fateful Findings Deserves Cult Status|first=Nathan|last=Rabin|date=December 8, 2015|website=Rotten Tomatoes|access-date=February 1, 2018}}</ref> while reviewers of the podcast '']'' said "Move over ''The Room'', move over '']''" and ''Mystery Science Theater 3000'' head writer ] described it as the "good-est bad movie, maybe, I've ever seen".<ref>{{Cite AV media|url=https://soundcloud.com/the-flop-house/ep-187-fateful-findings|title=Ep. #187 – Fateful Findings|first=Elliot|last=Kalan|first2=Dan|last2=McCoy|first3=Stuart|last3=Wellington|date=September 19, 2015|publisher=]|access-date=February 1, 2018|time=50:22 to 50:55}}</ref> ''Paste Magazine'' said ''Fateful Findings'' sits "right next to on the ] of bad movies", and noted that while Tommy Wiseau had eventually embraced and encouraged mockery of ''The Room'', Breen doesn't "pretend to be 'in on it'" and the film maintains a "magic" as sincere ].<ref>{{cite web|title=Fateful Findings: The Room for the Next Generation of Bad Movie Lovers|date=1 September 2023|access-date=26 October 2023|website=Paste Magazine|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/neil-breen/fateful-findings-bad-movies-the-room|first=Jacob|last=Oller}}</ref> ''Screen Rant'' and the ''New York Daily News'' later listed it as one of the worst films of all time.<ref name="Screen Rant"/><ref name="NYDN"/> | |||
=== ''Movie 43'' (2013) === | |||
{{Main|Movie 43{{!}}''Movie 43''}} | |||
Produced and co-directed by ], among others, ''Movie 43'' is a ]<ref name="nathanrabin.com"/> sex comedy film consisting of several vignettes each by a different director and a sizable cast of recognizable actors and actresses including ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Holding a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes, it is included on the site's 100 Worst Movies of All Time list,<ref name="rt100worst"/> and is also on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.<ref name="MRQE50"/> ''Movie 43'' won three awards at the ]: Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay. In the Worst Director category, all 13 directors won the award.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/moviesnow/la-et-mn-movie-43-named-worst-film-of-2013-razzie-awards-20140228,0,5893779.story |title='Movie 43' is named worst film of 2013 at the 34th Razzie Awards |work=] |date=March 1, 2014 |access-date=March 1, 2014 |first=Susan |last=King}}</ref> | |||
Several critics have called it one of the worst films ever made, including Peter Howell of the '']'', who said, "There's just one use for ''Movie 43'', apart from it being ground into the landfill that it deserves to become sooner rather than later. It provides me with a handy new answer to a question I'm often asked: 'What's the worst film you've ever seen?{{'"}}<ref name="TS3">{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2013/01/25/movie_43_review_the_worst_film_ever_gets_zero_stars.html|title=Movie 43 review: The worst film ever gets zero stars|last=Howell|first=Peter|date=January 25, 2013|work=]|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> Brady Murphy of ''Murphy Reviews'' wrote that the movie "had no heart" and gave it the site's first zero out of ten rating.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.murphyreviews.com/movie-43.html |title=Movie 43 |publisher=Murphy Reviews |date=January 30, 2013 |access-date=November 18, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020021708/http://www.murphyreviews.com/movie-43.html |archive-date=October 20, 2013 }}</ref> Meanwhile, ] of the '']'' voiced similar hatred, calling it "aggressively tasteless" and "the '']'' of awful."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/17804431-421/theres-awful-and-then-theres-movie-43.html|title=There's awful and THEN there's ''Movie 43''|date=January 25, 2013|work=]|last=Roeper|first=Richard|author-link=Richard Roeper|access-date=November 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130129011636/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/17804431-421/theres-awful-and-then-theres-movie-43.html|archive-date=January 29, 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> ] stated, "If you mashed-up the worst parts of the infamous ''Howard the Duck'', ''Gigli'', ''Ishtar'' and every other awful movie I've seen since I started reviewing professionally in 1981, it wouldn't begin to approach the sheer soul-sucking badness of the cringe-inducing ''Movie 43''."<ref>{{cite web |last=Tobias |first=Scott |title=Weekend Box Office: Race to the bottom |url=https://www.avclub.com/weekend-box-office-race-to-the-bottom-1798235931 |website=] |access-date=March 16, 2024 |language=en |date=January 28, 2013}}</ref> Elizabeth Weitzman of the '']'' also considered it the worst movie she ever saw.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/movie-review-movie-43-article-1.1248520|title=Movie Review: Movie 43|last=Weitzman|first=Elizabeth|date=January 26, 2013|work=]|access-date=April 17, 2019|location=New York}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Humshakals'' (2014) === | |||
{{Main|Humshakals{{!}}''Humshakals''}} | |||
]'s '']'' as having succeeded his previous film, '']'', in becoming the worst film in ] history.]] | |||
A ] comedy film directed by ], ''Humshakals'' featured Indian actors ], ] and ]. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on six reviews, with an average rating of 2/10.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/humshakals/ |title=Humshakals (2014) |website=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=July 10, 2017}}</ref> Mihir Fadnavis wrote in his '']'' review, "sexual tomfoolery, shrieking and hamming aside, there's much more to hate about this 'family movie'. It's disturbing to see such an atrocious, regressive, misogynistic, sexist, homophobic cinematic product force-fed to paying audiences. I can understand that a comedy need not be 'safe', but what goes on in ''Humshakals'' is simply too horrifying to bear."<ref name="Fadnavis">{{cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/blogs/humshakals-review-saif-ali-khan-riteish-deshmukh-team-up-to-give-you-brain-damage-1580181.html |title=Humshakals review: How Saif, Riteish teamed up to give your brain damage |work=Firstpost |last=Fadnavis|first=Mihir|date=June 22, 2014 |access-date=July 22, 2014}}</ref> Saurabh Dwivedi of '']'' stated "I can only say that ''Humshakals'' will be listed in one of the worst films of the century."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/humshakals-movie-review-sajid-khan-riteish-deshmukh-saif-ali-khan/1/367688.html |title=Movie review: Humshakals is three times trash |last=Dwivedi|first=Saurabh|date=June 20, 2014|magazine=]}}</ref> Writing in '']'', Sneha May Francis said that it succeeded Khan's previous endeavor, '']'', in becoming the worst Bollywood film ever.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/films-music/saif-ali-khan-s-humshakals-act-could-make-kareena-insecure-2014-06-19-1.553579 |title=Saif Ali Khan's 'Humshakals' act could make Kareena insecure |last=Francis|first=Sneha May|publisher=Emirates 24/7 |date=June 29, 2014 |access-date=October 22, 2014}}</ref> Fadnavis went further, writing that it displaced ''Himmatwala'' as the "worst possible product any film industry in the world can offer".<ref name="Fadnavis"/> Itrath Syed of '']'' stated that ''Humshakals'' was "the absolute bottom of the cinematic barrel".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.straight.com/movies/673511/humshakals-redefines-dreadfulness|title=Humshakals redefines dreadfulness|work=The Georgia Straight|last=Syed|first=Itrath|date=June 25, 2014 |access-date=July 10, 2017}}</ref> The film received five ] nominations,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/humshakals-lead-nominations-list-at-golden-kela-awards/article6905214.ece |title=Humshakals' leads nominations list at Golden Kela Awards |newspaper=The Hindu |author=PTI|date=February 17, 2015 |access-date=October 22, 2014 |location=Chennai, India}}</ref> and won the "award" for Worst Film.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenational.ae/arts-lifestyle/from-holly-to-bolly/sonakshi-and-arjun-grab-top-golden-kela-awards |title=Sonakshi and Arjun grab top Golden Kela awards |newspaper=The National |author=IANS|date=March 15, 2015 |access-date=August 17, 2015}}</ref> It also won two ]; the film won Worst Picture and Ram Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan and Riteish Deshmukh shared the Worst Actor award.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ghanta-awards-2015-complete-winners-list-sonakshi-sinha-ajay-devgn-win-worst-actor-awards-farah-625675 |title=Ghanta Awards 2015 Complete Winners List: Sonakshi Sinha, Ajay Devgn Win Worst Actor Awards; Farah Khan Worst Director |work=International Business Times|last=Mehta|first=Ankhita|date=March 9, 2015 |access-date=August 17, 2015}}</ref> | |||
Several of the cast members also lamented their involvement in the film. Despite being the film's leading actress, ] did not participate in the film's promotions because she was "extremely disturbed by the end result" and stated that "''Humshakals'' was the worst experience of my life".<ref>{{cite news |date=August 8, 2014 |title=Sajid Khan's Humshakals left me disturbed: Bipasha Basu |newspaper=Hindustan Times |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tabloid/sajid-khan-s-humshakals-left-me-disturbed-bipasha-basu/article1-1249663.aspx |author=IANS|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140809060246/http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tabloid/sajid-khan-s-humshakals-left-me-disturbed-bipasha-basu/article1-1249663.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 9, 2014 |location=Mumbai}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-bipasha-humshakals-was-the-worst-experience-of-my-life/20140826.htm |title=Bipasha: Humshakals was the worst experience of my life |work=Rediff.com |date=August 26, 2014}}</ref> Another cast member, actress ], warned her family to not watch the film.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Humshakals-I-asked-my-father-not-to-watch-the-film-says-Esha-Gupta/articleshow/37616095.cms |title=Humshakals: I asked my father not to watch the film, says Esha Gupta |newspaper=Times of India |date= July 2, 2014 }}</ref> After the release of the film, leading actor Saif Ali Khan lamented that "I've been introspecting a lot and will never repeat a mistake that was ''Humshakals''."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Saif-Ali-Khan-Humshakals-was-a-mistake/articleshow/38590378.cms |title=Saif Ali Khan: Humshakals was a mistake |newspaper=Times of India |date= July 18, 2014 }}</ref> | |||
=== ''Saving Christmas'' (2014) === | |||
{{Main|Saving Christmas{{!}}''Saving Christmas''}} | |||
''Saving Christmas'' is a ] ] ] starring ], who plays a fictionalized version of himself attempting to convince his brother-in-law (played by the film's director, ]) that Christmas is still a Christian holiday.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Kenigsberg|first=Ben|date=November 13, 2014|title=To Save Us All From Satan's Power|language=en-US|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/14/movies/kirk-camerons-saving-christmas-intervenes.html|access-date=June 8, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a ], based on 19 reviews, with an average rating of 2.40/10.<ref name="savingrotten">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/kirk_camerons_saving_christmas/reviews/|title=Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas|website=]|access-date=December 17, 2020}}</ref> Critic David Keyes described ''Saving Christmas'' as "The worst holiday movie ever made",<ref name="savingrotten"/> '']'' selected the film as the worst Christmas movie of all time,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://billingsgazette.com/entertainment/movies/the-worst-christmas-movies-of-all-time/collection_b50903c8-f2cf-54ce-8fea-90fac279d391.html|title=The 25 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time|work=]|date=December 12, 2016|access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref> and Will Nicol of ''Digital Trends'' included it on his list of the ten worst movies ever made.<ref name="digitaltrends">{{cite web|url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/movies/worst-movies-ever-made/|title=10 Worst Movies You Can Watch|work=]|last=Nicol|first=Will|date=May 10, 2017|access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref> ] picked ''Saving Christmas'' as the worst film she has ever reviewed and called it "] of Christmas movies" (while adding that she found ''The Room'' to be more enjoyable) and gave it a score of zero stars out of four.<ref name="indieworst">{{cite web|url=https://indiewire.com/2017/06/critics-worst-movies-ever-reviewed-1201843846/|title=Critics Pick the Worst Movies They've Ever Reviewed|work=]|last=Kohn|first=Eric|date=June 19, 2017|access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://christylemire.com/kirk-camerons-saving-christmas/|title=Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas|date=November 21, 2014|last=Lemire|first=Christy|author-link=Christy Lemire|work=Christy Lemire|access-date=September 9, 2018|language=en-US}}</ref> Reece Taylor of ''Comic Book Resources'' also considers it the worst film ever made.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Taylor |first1=Reece |title=Is This Christmas Film the Worst Movie of All Time? |url=https://www.cbr.com/worst-movie-all-time-kirk-cameron-saving-christmas/ |website=] |access-date=December 26, 2024 |language=en |date=December 24, 2022}}</ref> The film's history after release was further marred by widespread ]; Cameron asked fans to give the film positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes,<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.christianpost.com/news/kirk-cameron-urges-fans-to-improve-saving-christmas-rating-help-me-storm-the-gates-of-rotten-tomatoes-130072/ |title=Kirk Cameron Urges Fans to Improve ''Saving Christmas'' Rating, 'Help Me Storm the Gates of Rotten Tomatoes' |author=Koonse, Emma |newspaper=] |date=November 21, 2014 |access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref> which resulted in a backlash of Internet users instead travelling to the Rotten Tomatoes page to ] the film.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://cinemablend.com/new/Kirk-Cameron-Tried-Cheat-Rotten-Tomatoes-It-Did-Go-68399.html |title=Kirk Cameron Tried To Cheat Rotten Tomatoes, It Did Not Go Well |last=Wakeman |first=Gregory | work=] |date=November 25, 2014 |access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref> Three weeks after its release, ''Saving Christmas'' became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's bottom 100 list. Cameron blamed the low rating on a ] campaign by "haters and ]" to purposely lower the film's ratings.<ref>{{cite news|last=O'Neal|first=Sean|date=December 5, 2014|title=Kirk Cameron Is Crucified at the Hands of IMDb Users, Rises with Jesus Coffee|url=https://avclub.com/article/kirk-cameron-crucified-hands-imdb-users-rises-jesu-212677|newspaper=]|access-date=December 9, 2014}}</ref> The film won four awards, including Worst Picture, at the ].<ref>{{cite news|last=King|first=Susan|date=February 21, 2015|title=Kirk Cameron's ''Saving Christmas'' Dominates the 35th Razzie Awards|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-kirk-cameron-35th-razzie-awards-20150220-story.html |newspaper=]|access-date=July 28, 2017}}</ref> | |||
=== ''United Passions'' (2014) === | |||
{{Main|United Passions{{!}}''United Passions''}} | |||
], who starred in '']'', called it "awful".<ref>{{cite web |url= https://metro.co.uk/2015/12/23/tim-roth-calls-his-fifa-movie-united-passions-awful-says-he-only-made-it-to-pay-his-kids-college-fees-5582396/ |website=Metro.co |title= Tim Roth calls his FIFA movie United Passions 'awful', says he only made it to pay his kids' college fees|date=December 23, 2015 }}</ref> The movie received the first ] during the ],<ref name=smh>{{Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/razzie-awards-hillarys-america-blows-golden-raspberries-at-preoscar-awards-shamefest-20170226-gulepe.html|title=Razzie Awards: Hillary's America blows golden raspberries at pre-Oscar awards shamefest|last=Idato|first=Michael|date=February 26, 2017|website=The Sydney Morning Herald |access-date=January 6, 2020}}</ref> and is tied for the lowest scoring film on ].<ref name="Metacritic"/>]] | |||
A 2014 English-language French ] about the origins of the football world governing body ] (FIFA), ''United Passions'' starred ] (as FIFA President ]), ] and ] and was directed by ]. ''United Passions''{{'}} release in the U.S. occurred simultaneously with the ], in which several current and former members of FIFA's executive committee were arrested on charges of corruption,<ref name="Scheck">{{cite news |last=Scheck |first=Frank |title='United Passions': Film Review |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/united-passions-film-review-799879 |newspaper=] |access-date=June 4, 2015}}</ref> and Blatter himself resigned following repeated accusations of corruption at FIFA under his leadership.<ref>{{cite news |last=Parker |first=Graham |date=June 2, 2015 |title=Sepp Blatter: A history of scandal |url=http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/6/2/sepp-blatter-a-history-of-scandal.html |publisher=] |access-date=June 4, 2015}}</ref> ''United Passions'' was accused of ignoring these long-running claims.<ref name="Scheck"/><ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2015/06/09/12556292/is-united-passions-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-fifa%E2%80%93|title=Is United Passions the worst movie of all time? Fifa propaganda film paints Blatter as a bastion of morality|last=Koylu|first=Enis|website=Goal.com|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref><ref name="field">{{cite news |last=Field |first=Paul |date=June 3, 2015 |title=United Passions review: FIFA's hideous £16 million movie is unintentional comedy gold |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/united-passions-review-fifas-hideous-5817599 |newspaper=] |access-date=June 25, 2015}}</ref> '']''{{'}}s ] wrote that ''United Passions'' was "the worst movie ever made" and "the most extraordinary vanity exercise; a vile, self-aggrandizing, sugar-coated pile of manure".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/des-kelly-sugarcoated-fifa-film-is-spreading-around-europe-like-a-virus-9820165.html |title=Sugar-coated FIFA film is spreading around Europe like a virus |first=Des |last=Kelly |work=London Evening Standard |date=October 27, 2014 |access-date=June 25, 2015}}</ref> Sean Mahoney of '']'' called it the "worst movie ever".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/2156283/worst-movie-ever-fifas-united-passions-called-unwatchable-and-cinematic-excrement/amp/ |title= Worst Movie Ever: 'United Passions' FIFA Film Called 'Unwatchable' And 'Cinematic Excrement' |first= Sean|last= Mahoney| website=Inquisitr|date= June 8, 2015 }}</ref> Daniel Gold of ''The New York Times'' claimed ''United Passions'' is "one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory, a dishonest bit of corporate-suite sanitizing that's no good even for laughs",<ref>{{Cite web |first=Daniel M. |last=Gold |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/movies/review-in-united-passions-a-fictionalized-fifa-underwritten-by-the-soccer-group.html |title=Review: In 'United Passions', a Fictionalized FIFA, Underwritten by the Soccer Group |work=The New York Times|date=June 4, 2015|access-date=June 25, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150605175501/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/movies/review-in-united-passions-a-fictionalized-fifa-underwritten-by-the-soccer-group.html |archive-date=2015-06-05}}</ref> later stating it would make the top three of his list of all time bad films.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/06/14/exp-new-film-about-fifa-opens-in-the-u-s-.cnn|title='United Passions' not getting good reviews|publisher=CNN|date=June 14, 2015|access-date=September 4, 2015}}</ref> Several critics noted the irony of the film's depiction of Blatter as an anti-corruption campaigner. Paul Field of the '']'' said that this created "unintentional comedy gold".<ref name="field"/> On Rotten Tomatoes, ''United Passions'' has an approval rating of 0% based on 16 reviews,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/united_passions|title=United Passions (2015)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=September 28, 2019}}</ref> while on ], the film holds a score of 1 out of 100, based on 9 critics, and is tied for the lowest scoring film on the site.<ref name="Metacritic"/> ''Screen Rant'' subsequently included it on its list of the 25 worst movies of all time.<ref name="Screen Rant"/> | |||
''United Passions'' was also a ], becoming the second-lowest-grossing film ever in American history, with a total take of $918, surpassed only by the 2006 thriller '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://avclub.com/article/fifa-vanity-project-united-passions-breaks-box-off-221084|title=FIFA vanity project ''United Passions'' breaks box-office record (not the good kind)|last=Rife|first=Katie|date=June 19, 2015|work=]|publisher=]|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> The film additionally went ] in France and was not distributed in a number of other European countries.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-fifa-movie-united-passions-bombs-20150608-story.html|title='United Passions,' which cost FIFA $29 million, has $607 box-office take|first=Austin|last=Knoblauch|work=]|date=June 25, 2015|access-date=June 8, 2015}}</ref><ref name="Ikav">{{cite web|url=http://www.espnfc.com/fifa-world-cup/story/2496658/fifa-film-united-passions-among-worst-in-us-history|title=FIFA film 'United Passions' one of worst in U.S. box office history|author=<!--Not stated-->|work=]|publisher=(])|date=June 25, 2015|access-date=June 21, 2015}}</ref> Several of the people involved in ''United Passions'' later expressed regret over the film. Director Auburtin called ''United Passions'' "a disaster" and added: "Now I'm seen as bad as the guy who brought AIDS to Africa or the guy who caused the financial crisis ... apparently I am a propaganda guy making films for corrupt people."<ref name="Ikav"/><ref name="r&r">{{cite news|url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/fifa-movie-director-breaks-silence-802760|title=FIFA Movie Director Breaks Silence on Bomb: "It's a Disaster; My Name Is All Over "|first1=Scott |last1=Roxborough |first2=Rhonda |last2=Richford |name-list-style=amp|work=]|date=June 17, 2015|access-date=June 25, 2015}}</ref> Roth apologized for taking part in the film and admitted that he took the job in ''United Passions'' for the money.<ref name="r&r"/> It also received the first Barry L. Bumstead Award during the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/razzie-awards-mock-fifty-shades-870615|title=Razzie Awards Mock 'Fifty Shades of Grey,' Redeem Sylvester Stallone|website=The Hollywood Reporter|date=February 28, 2016 |language=en|access-date=January 6, 2020}}</ref> a special category for critical and financial failures that were not given an eligible release.<ref name=smh/> | |||
===''Dirty Grandpa'' (2016)=== | |||
{{Main|Dirty Grandpa}} | |||
''Dirty Grandpa'', a 2016 comedy film starring ] and ] as a grandfather and grandson going to ] during ], received negative reviews for its ] and ] that was also considered as ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://sassymamainla.com/2016/01/how-dirty-grandpa-made-my-feminism-hurt/.html|title=How DIRTY GRANDPA Made My Feminism Hurt: An Exposé|last=Howard|first=Courtney|date=January 22, 2016|website=Sassy Mama in LA|language=en-US|access-date=September 28, 2019|archive-date=December 27, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227042320/http://sassymamainla.com/2016/01/how-dirty-grandpa-made-my-feminism-hurt/.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> ], and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/02/comedies-like-dirty-grandpa-get-hard-are-horribly-homophobic.html|title=Some of Hollywood's Most Successful Comedies Have a "Hipster Homophobia" Problem|last=Lang|first=Nico|date=February 10, 2016|website=]|language=en|access-date=September 28, 2019}}</ref> Mike Ryan of '']'' said: "''Dirty Grandpa'' is the worst movie I've ever seen in a movie theater. Burn it."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiewire.com/2016/01/reviews-is-dirty-grandpa-robert-deniros-worst-movie-ever-124909/|title=Reviews: Is 'Dirty Grandpa' Robert DeNiro's Worst Movie Ever?|last=Murthi|first=Vikram|date=January 22, 2016|website=IndieWire|language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}}</ref> He later also picked it as the worst film he had ever both reviewed<ref name="indieworst"/> and seen.<ref>{{cite news|last=Ryan|first=Mike|title='Dirty Grandpa': The Most Important Movie Ever Made|url=http://uproxx.com/movies/dirty-grandpa-review/|access-date=January 16, 2018|publisher=]|date=January 21, 2016}}</ref> Pete Hammond of ] said: "... ''Dirty Grandpa,'' is not just the worst movie has ever been in, but it may be the worst movie ''anyone'' has ever been in."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2016/01/dirty-grandpa-review-zac-efron-robert-de-niro-worst-ever-1201688276/|title='Dirty Grandpa' Review: The Worst Film Of Robert De Niro's Career (Or Maybe Anybody's)|last=Hammond|first=Pete|date=January 22, 2016|website=Deadline|language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}}</ref> Glenn McDonald of ] said: "The awful, ugly ''Dirty Grandpa'' is the comedy equivalent of torture porn ... In fact, in the dizzying moments after being bludgeoned by this miserable specimen, I was convinced it's among the worst movies ever made."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indyweek.com/culture/archives/movie-review-awful-ugly-dirty-grandpa-comedy-equivalent-torture-porn/|title=Movie review: The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn|last=McDonald|first=Glenn|date=January 22, 2016|website=INDY Week|language=en-us|access-date=December 26, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227181550/https://indyweek.com/culture/archives/movie-review-awful-ugly-dirty-grandpa-comedy-equivalent-torture-porn/ |archive-date=2018-12-27}}</ref> ] gave the film zero stars, writing, "If ''Dirty Grandpa'' isn't the worst movie of 2016, I have some serious cinematic torture in my near future."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/dirty-grandpa-robert-de-niro-deserves-better-than-this-dreck/|title='Dirty Grandpa': Robert De Niro deserves better than this dreck|website=Chicago Sun-Times|date=March 6, 2016 |language=en|access-date=December 26, 2018}}</ref> On his YouTube channel, Roeper also said: "I'm not ready to say ''Dirty Grandpa'' is the worst movie I've ever seen, but I'm also not ready to say it's ''not'' the worst movie I've ever seen."<ref>{{Citation|title=Richard Roeper Reviews "Dirty Grandpa"|date=January 21, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOu2gzJiaCg|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/XOu2gzJiaCg|archive-date=October 28, 2021|language=en|access-date=September 29, 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref> ], on his ] show ('']''), said that he found the film "truly, genuinely horrible" and went on to say, "after ''Dirty Grandpa'' I did feel genuinely unclean, I wanted to go and have a shower, because it's just so revolting. Somewhere in hell there is a multiplex playing this on a double bill, with '']'' and '']''."<ref>{{Citation|last=kermodeandmayo|title=Dirty Grandpa reviewed by Mark Kermode|date=January 29, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05GwDHYXlmI|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/05GwDHYXlmI|archive-date=October 28, 2021|access-date=December 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> He would later go on to brand it his least favorite film of 2016.<ref>{{Citation|last=kermodeandmayo|title=The Ten Worst Films of 2016: Part Two|date=December 30, 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NwzBUjeMl0|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/4NwzBUjeMl0|archive-date=October 28, 2021|access-date=December 27, 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref> | |||
Glenn Kenny of '']'' said: "The actor ] appeared in some landmark, perhaps even great, films at the beginning of his Hollywood career in the 1930s. ... Lugosi's final film was 1957's '']'', frequently cited as the worst film ever made. The cinematic landmarks of De Niro's career include films such as ]'s '']'' and ]'s '']''. He has been featured in a good number of very bad films in the years since. But this? This might just be his own ''Plan 9.''"<ref name="glennkenny">{{Cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/dirty-grandpa-2016|title=Dirty Grandpa Movie Review & Film Summary (2016)|last=Kenny|first=Glenn|website=]|language=en|access-date=February 17, 2019}}</ref> The film has an approval rating of 10% at Rotten Tomatoes based on 135 reviews, with an average rating of 3.1/10,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dirty_grandpa/|title=Dirty Grandpa (2016)|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=November 18, 2021}}</ref> while on ] it has a score of 21 out of 100 based on 27 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/dirty-grandpa|title=Dirty Grandpa Reviews|website=]|publisher=]|access-date=September 28, 2019}}</ref> At the ] it received five nominations, for Worst Picture, Worst Actor (De Niro), Worst Screenplay, and two nominations for Worst Supporting Actress (] and ]), but did not win in any category. | |||
=== ''Guardians'' (2017) === | |||
{{Main|Guardians (2017 film){{!}}''Guardians'' (2017 film)}} | |||
''Guardians'' is a 2017 Russian ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/guardians-movie-trailer-2017-russian-923229/|title=Trailer for Russian Superhero Movie 'Guardians' Is So Weird It Just Might Be Good|first=Aaron|last=Couch|website=] |date=August 26, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mubi.com/films/guardians-2017|title=Guardians|via=mubi.com}}</ref> about a team of Soviet superheroes created during the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://letterboxd.com/film/guardians-2017/|title=Guardians (2017)|website=Letterboxd|access-date=April 17, 2019}}</ref> It was criticized for having a derivative plot, bad acting and direction, cheap CGI, ]s, and overall low quality. ''Kg-portal.ru'' wrote that "''Guardians'' is a film from which Russian cinema should be protected. It's like a sequel to ''Plan 9 from Outer Space'', filmed by ], with the screenplay by ] and with him in the lead role."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://kg-portal.ru/movies/zaschitniki/reviews/5269/|script-title=ru:Дерьмо на экспорт | |||
|language=ru|work=kg-portal.ru|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}}</ref> '']'' commented that the film was "Worse than you can imagine."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://rg.ru/2017/02/24/zashchitniki-sarika-andreasiana-naskolko-eto-ploho.html|script-title=ru:Ослик, суслик, Андреасян | |||
|language=ru|work=]|date=February 24, 2017|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref> '']'' compared the film's director, ], to ''Plan 9 from Outer Space''{{'}}s director, ], and said that ''Guardians'' "is a convincing answer to the eternal question of why we can never catch up with Hollywood even in our own box office".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://meduza.io/feature/2017/02/23/filmy-na-nedelyu-patrioticheskie-i-uzhasayuschie-zaschitniki-a-takzhe-dzheki-toni-erdmann-i-slishkom-svobodnyy-chelovek|script-title=ru:Фильмы на неделю: патриотические (и ужасающие) "Защитники", а также "Джеки", "Тони Эрдманн" и "Слишком свободный человек"|language=ru|work=]|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}}</ref> '']'' said that it was the Russian answer to '']'',<ref>{{cite news|url=https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/4639-zaschitniki-nash-otvet-govardu-utke/|script-title=ru:"Защитники" Сарика Андреасяна: наш ответ Говарду-утке|language=ru|work=]|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019}}</ref> and ] commented that "a more talentless film is hard to imagine".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ivi.tv/watch/143155/reviews/44706|script-title=ru:Защитите нас от "Защитников"|language=ru|work=]|date=October 23, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019|archive-date=February 20, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220181302/https://www.ivi.tv/watch/143155/reviews/44706|url-status=dead}}</ref> ] placed it at the top of their worst film list<ref name="RIA">{{cite news|url=https://ria.ru/20171128/1509765632.html?referrer_block=index_daynews3_1|script-title=ru:Самый худший фильм: какие картины последних лет разочаровали зрителей | |||
|language=ru|publisher=]|date= November 28, 2017|access-date=February 19, 2019 | |||
|work=РИА Новости | |||
}}</ref> and Russian ] ] listed it among the all-time lowest-scoring films.<ref name="Kritikanstvo">{{cite news|url=http://www.kritikanstvo.ru/top/movies/worst/alltime/|script-title=ru:Худшие фильмы|language=ru|publisher=Kritikanstvo|access-date=February 19, 2019}}</ref> Critics outside of Russia generally panned the film but were not as harsh, as it has a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 12 reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/guardians_2017|title=Guardians (Zashchitniki)|work=]|publisher=]|access-date=November 18, 2021}}</ref> A sequel was planned,<ref>{{cite web |url= https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/russian-superhero-film-china-release-868671|title= Russian Cold War Superhero Film to Get China Release Under Import Quota|first=Vladimir|last=Kozlov|date= February 23, 2016|access-date= February 23, 2019|work= ]}}</ref> but the film was a box-office bomb, which resulted in the film's production company, ], subsequently filing for bankruptcy, and the ], which provided part of the budget, suing the company and demanding a return of the investment. | |||
===''Loqueesha'' (2019)=== | |||
{{main|Loqueesha{{!}}''Loqueesha''}} | |||
The 2019 comedy film '']'' stars Jeremy Saville, who also independently wrote, directed, and produced the film, as Joe, who needs money to pay for his son's private school education and, after getting rejected for a job as a radio host, the listing for which encourages women and minorities to apply, gets the job by pretending to be a sassy black woman named Loqueesha who gives out advice on air.<ref name="Rabinlo">{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |title=Loqueesha is Somehow Much Worse Than It Looks |url=https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2019/6/3/birth-of-a-soul-sister-case-file-127my-year-of-flops-ii-24-loqueesha |website=Nathan Rabin's Happy Place |author-link=Nathan Rabin |date=August 1, 2022 |access-date=August 3, 2022}}</ref> The film's trailer and poster were panned online as racist and stereotypical upon their release,<ref>{{cite web |last=Graham |first=Adam |title=Detroit-set film 'Loqueesha' causes social media stir |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/05/13/detroit-set-film-loqueesha-causes-social-media-stir/1189396001/ |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=May 13, 2019}}</ref> with '']''{{'}}s Brian Lloyd writing that it was "one the ]''] worst fucking things we have ever seen, and we still can't believe it's actually real".<ref>{{cite web |last=Richards |first=Brian |title="Loqueesha" Is A Movie That Actually Exists In The Year 2019, And This Trailer Is More Disturbing Than Any Horror Movie |url=https://www.pajiba.com/web_culture/the-trailer-for-loqueesha-is-more-disturbing-than-any-horror-movie.php |website=Pajiba |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=May 11, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Lloyd |first=Brian |title=Here's the trailer for 'Loqueesha', the worst movie of this decade |url=https://entertainment.ie/movies/movie-news/heres-the-trailer-for-loqueesha-the-worst-movie-of-this-decade-401275/ |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=May 11, 2019}}</ref> Upon seeing the actual film, Nathan Rabin said that the film was "somehow much worse" than the trailer led people to believe.<ref name="Rabinlo"/> | |||
The film received universally negative reception from critics, as it garnered a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{cite web |title=Loqueesha |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/loqueesha |access-date=July 9, 2022 |website=] |publisher=] |language=en}}</ref> Joel Golby of '']'' called the plot "one of the more offensive in history", also criticizing its lighting, sound design, and acting, among other aspects of the film, and writing, "The worst film ever made. Worse than ''The Room'', in every way. The one-star rating it currently has on IMDb is actively generous. I cannot believe this film got made."<ref>{{cite web |last=Golby |first=Joel |title=Is Loqueesha the worst film ever made? |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/jun/08/is-loqueesha-worst-film-ever-made |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=June 8, 2019}}</ref> Dan Kahan of ''Popdust'' called it "genuinely the worst movie ever watched", calling Saville an "unbelievable racist" and deeming the movie "grotesque", "abhorrent", and "criminal".<ref>{{cite web |last=Kahan |first=Dan |title=Delete This Film: "Loqueesha" Is Genuinely the Worst Movie I've Ever Watched |url=https://www.popdust.com/loqueesha-is-worst-movie-ever-2638947149.html |website=Popdust |access-date=July 8, 2022 |language=en |date=June 23, 2019}}</ref> For '']'', Kay-B wrote that she "wouldn't recommend this film to anyone, living or dead" as it was "painfully hard to watch" while also dubbing it "the year's most reviled movie".<ref>{{cite web |author1=Kay-B |title='Loqueesha,' The Year's Most Reviled Movie, Is Now Streaming on Amazon Prime |url=https://decider.com/2019/06/05/loqueesha-review/ |website=] |access-date=July 8, 2022 |date=June 5, 2019}}</ref> | |||
===''Cats'' (2019)=== | |||
{{main|Cats (2019 film){{!}}''Cats'' (2019 film)}} | |||
], who wrote the 1980s ]-winning ] of '']'', called the film "ridiculous". It was widely panned for unusual ] and poor performances.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-ridiculousl_n_5f27f889c5b656e9b09e26be |title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Lashes Out At 'Cats' Movie And Director |work=]|date=August 3, 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://ew.com/movies/andrew-lloyd-webber-slams-cats-movie-ridiculous/ |title=Andrew Lloyd Webber slams Cats film adaptation |magazine=Entertainment Weekly}}</ref>]] | |||
'']'' is a ] of the ] penned by ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.thewrap.com/cats-movie-may-happen-andrew-lloyd-webber-says/ |title='Cats' Movie May Happen, Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber Says |date=December 3, 2013 |website=TheWrap|access-date=February 21, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180720195119/https://www.thewrap.com/cats-movie-may-happen-andrew-lloyd-webber-says/|archive-date=July 20, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2020/08/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-tom-hooper-1203001983/|title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"|first=Dino-Ray|last=Ramos|work=Deadline|date=August 2, 2020|access-date=August 3, 2020}}</ref> (based on ] of ]) and directed by ]-winning filmmaker ] ('']'').<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/cats-movie-review-2019|title=Cats movie review & film summary (2019) | Roger Ebert|first=Sheila|last=O'Malley|website=]}}</ref> The film is about a tribe of cats called the ] as they hold their Jellicle Ball, an annual ceremony where the cats compete for the chance to enter ], where the chosen Jellicle will ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://letterboxd.com/film/cats-2019/|title=Cats (2019)|via=letterboxd.com}}</ref> | |||
Lloyd Webber condemned the film as "ridiculous" stating, "The problem with the film was that Tom Hooper decided that he didn't want anybody involved in it who was involved in the original show."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2020/08/andrew-lloyd-webber-cats-movie-tom-hooper-1203001983/|title=Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"|first=Dino-Ray|last=Ramos|work=Deadline|date=August 2, 2020|access-date=September 23, 2020}}</ref> | |||
It was criticized for ] "] technology",<ref name="negativeten"/> which depicted the film's actors as bipedal cats. An updated version of the film, with a refined CGI patch, was sent to theaters after its premiere.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/23/21034843/cats-film-updated-digital-fur-technology|title=Cats is being patched with 'improved visual effects'|date=December 23, 2019 |work=]|first1=Thomas |last1=Ricker}}</ref> Describing the experimentation with digital fur as one of the worst decisions in movie history, '']'' wrote: "There are many, many other problems with ''Cats'', ... but it was hard for anyone to focus on any of them when it just looked so shitty and disturbing."<ref name="50decisions"/> Other critics also panned the performances of some of the actors, with ] and ] (who parodied themselves at the ]) receiving the most criticism.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqAe7U54ry0|title="1917" wins Best Visual Effects|date=March 11, 2020 |via=YouTube}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2489991/the-oscars-cats-jokes-has-the-academy-in-hot-water-with-the-visual-effects-society|title=The Oscars' Cats Jokes Has The Academy In Hot Water With The Visual Effects Society – CINEMABLEND|date=February 11, 2020 }}</ref> {{as of|June 2024}}, ''Cats'' sits at a 19% on Rotten Tomatoes.<ref>{{cite web|title=Cats (2019)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cats_2019|access-date=June 10, 2024|website=]|publisher=]}}</ref> The film won six awards out of nine nominations at the ], including ] for Hooper, ] for Wilson, ] for Corden, and ] overall.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/awards/2020-razzie-award-winners-cats/|title= Razzies 2020 winners list: Cats wins Worst Picture at Razzie Awards|magazine=]}}</ref> | |||
Early reviews for ''Cats'' were embargoed.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Lodge |first=Guy |date=2019-12-18 |title=Feline confident? Cats' last-minute dash to the cinema |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/dec/18/cats-musical-awards-trailer-premiere-box-office |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-12-17 |title=Star Wars and Cats: First reactions pour in |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50822692 |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> ] from '']'' commented that " doctoral thesis could be written about how this misfire sputtered into existence".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Convery |first=Stephanie |date=2019-12-19 |title='A furry orgy in a dumpster': what the reviews say about Cats |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/dec/19/a-furry-orgy-in-a-dumpster-what-the-reviews-say-about-cats |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> British newspaper '']'' called the film an "all-time disaster" with reviewer Tim Robey giving the film "zero stars" in his review.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Robey |first=Tim |date=2019-12-19 |title=Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/cats-review-sinister-all-time-disaster-no-one-emerges-unscathed/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Telegraph |language=en-GB |issn=0307-1235}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2019-12-19 |title=Cats star Jason Derulo says 'reviews don't matter' after the film is panned by critics |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/19/cats-star-jason-derulo-says-reviews-dont-matter-film-panned/ |access-date=2024-02-27 |work=The Telegraph |language=en-GB |issn=0307-1235}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/cats-review-sinister-all-time-disaster-no-one-emerges-unscathed/|title=Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed|first=Tim|last=Robey|newspaper=The Telegraph |date=December 19, 2019}}</ref> Critics from '']'', ''Rolling Stone'' and '']'' wrote that it was a candidate for the worst film of the 2010s, with ''The Detroit News'' reviewer Adam Graham writing: "''Cats'' is the biggest disaster of the decade, and possibly thus far in the millennium. It's ''Battlefield Earth'' with whiskers."<ref>{{cite news|last=Graham|first=Adam|title=Review: Me-ouch! Film version of 'Cats' a Deuteronomy disaster|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/12/19/cats-movie-review-disaster/2664918001/|access-date=December 20, 2019|work=The Detroit News|date=December 19, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219231516/https://www.detroitnews.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/12/19/cats-movie-review-disaster/2664918001/|archive-date=December 19, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/12/20/biggest-disaster-decade-roundup-most-memorable-cats-reviews/|title='Cats': Critics pan Andrew Lloyd Webber musical's movie adaptation |newspaper=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/cats-movie-review-taylor-swift-927486/|title='Cats': A Broadway Musical Adaptation Straight Outta the Litter Box |magazine=] }}</ref> Graham later selected ''Cats'' as the worst movie he had ever seen.<ref name="newsgazette"/> Wade Major of ''CineGods.com'' slammed it as "'']'' with fur", while ''Battlefield Earth'' screenwriter ] (who previously won ]) said ''Cats'' had usurped his film as the worst ever made.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cinegods.com/tomato-slam-cats/|title=TOMATO SLAM: CATS|first=Wade|last=Major|date=December 20, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Chilton |first=Louis |title=Writer of Battlefield Earth names Cats as the new worst movie ever |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/battlefield-earth-cats-musical-worst-movie-ever-scientology-travolta-a9515991.html |website=] |access-date=March 16, 2024 |language=en |date= May 15, 2020}}</ref> ''Cats'' was included on ''Time Out''{{'}}s 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.<ref name="timeoutlist"/> | |||
== 2020s == | |||
=== ''365 Days'' (2020) === | |||
{{Main|365 Days (2020 film){{!}}''365 Days'' (2020 film)}} | |||
], ], and ] (from left to right) appeared at a promotional event for '']'']] | |||
''365 Days'' (]: ''365 Dni'') is a 2020 ] ] ] film directed by Barbara Białowąs and Tomasz Mandes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/02/movies/365-days-netflix.html|title=How '365 Days' Became One of Netflix's Worst-Reviewed Big Hits|first=Ashley|last=Spencer|newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 2, 2020}}</ref> It is based on the first novel of a trilogy by ]. The plot follows a young woman from ] in a spiritless relationship falling for a dominant ] man, who imprisons and imposes on her a period of 365 days for which to fall in love with him. It stars ] as Don Massimo Torricelli and ] as Laura Biel. The film was released theatrically in Poland on February 7, 2020, and was later made available on ] on June 7, 2020, where, despite extremely negative critical response, it became one of the most-watched films, for a time being the fourth-most-watched media on Netflix UK and the third-most-watched media on Netflix US, and gained global attention.<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 23, 2020|title=365 Days: the Netflix softcore porn film that people can't stop watching|url=http://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jun/23/365-days-netflix-polish-film|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> It was also a box-office success at Polish cinemas, grossing an estimated $8,964,000.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Day |first=Matt |date=June 23, 2020 |title=Controversial erotic thriller dubbed one of the worst films EVER becomes global smash |url=https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/controversial-erotic-thriller-becomes-global-smash-13560 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200723031959/https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/controversial-erotic-thriller-becomes-global-smash-13560 |archive-date=2020-07-23 |access-date=2024-11-01 |work=]}}</ref> The film received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics, who heavily criticized its ], ] and ] glorification. Rotten Tomatoes collected 16 reviews and identified ], with an average rating of 1.9/10.<ref>{{Citation|title=365 Days (2020)|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/365_days_2020|language=en|access-date=August 7, 2021}}</ref> Polish English-language news website '']'' says that it has been dubbed one of the worst films ever.<ref name=":0" /> Taylor Andrews of '']'' called it the worst thing he had ever seen.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Taylor Andrews|date=June 8, 2020|title=Please, I Beg You: Do Not Watch '365 DNI' for Anything but the Sex Scenes|url=https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a32802161/365-dni-netflix-review-sexy-controversy/|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=Cosmopolitan|language=en-US}}</ref> Kevin Maher of '']'' said "There haven't been line readings this poor since the third act of '']''" and "It makes the bonking puppets in '']'' look like straight-faced documentary".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Maher|first=Kevin|title=365 Days review — this Polish soft-porn flick is execrable|newspaper=]|language=en|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/365-days-review-this-polish-soft-porn-flick-is-execrable-htjjv8kd9|access-date=August 7, 2021|issn=0140-0460|date=June 19, 2020}}</ref> Maddy Mussen of '']'' called it "the worst thing Netflix has ever produced" and said "If you have watched ''365 Days'' on Netflix, there will not be a doubt in your mind that it's the worst thing you've ever seen."<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 16, 2020|title=27 reasons why '365 Days' is the worst thing Netflix has ever produced|url=https://thetab.com/uk/2020/06/16/27-reasons-why-365-days-is-the-worst-thing-netflix-has-ever-produced-161825|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=UK|language=en-GB}}</ref> Jessica Kiang of '']'' called it "a thoroughly terrible, politically objectionable, occasionally hilarious Polish humpathon".<ref>{{Cite web|last=Kiang|first=Jessica|date=June 10, 2020|title='365 Days': Film Review|url=https://variety.com/2020/film/reviews/365-days-review-365-dni-1234629333/|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=Variety|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
In March 2021, the film was nominated for six ], for Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (]), Worst Actress (]), Worst Screenplay and Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.joblo.com/razzie-nominations-dolittle-365-days-worst-of-the-year/|title=Razzie Nominations: Dolittle & 365 Days top nods for worst of the year|first=Gaius|last=Bolling|date=March 12, 2021}}</ref> becoming the second foreign-language film to be nominated for Worst Picture after Italy's '']'' (2002; albeit the dubbed version),<ref>{{Cite web|title=RAZZ NEWZ|url=http://razzies.com/razz-newz.html|access-date=August 7, 2021|website=The Razzies!|language=en}}</ref> and won only one in the Screenplay category.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/razzie-awards-2021-winners/|title=Razzie Awards 2021 Winners: Music, 365 Days Win Big at 41st Golden Raspberry Awards}}</ref> | |||
=== ''Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey'' (2023) === | |||
{{Main|Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey{{!}}''Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey''}} | |||
]'' (directed by ], pictured above) was critically panned<ref>{{cite web |url=https://collider.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review |last=Bonaime |first=Ross |title='Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: Oh (Don't) Bother |date=February 16, 2023 |website=]}}</ref> for its cheap quality and poor execution.]] | |||
'']'' is a 2023 low-budget British horror film which reimagines the characters of ] by ] as mutant ] villains, released after Milne's work entered the ] a year prior.<ref>{{cite web |last=Neuenkirchen |first=Andreas |title=Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey Is Building to an Anti-Disney Horror Universe |url=https://www.cbr.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-anti-disney/ |website=] |access-date=March 10, 2024 |language=en |date=February 10, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://collider.com/best-winnie-the-pooh-movies |title=The 10 Best Winnie the Pooh Movies Before Seeing 'Blood And Honey' |last=Searle |first=Tyler B. |website=] |date=August 5, 2022}}</ref> It was widely criticized for its premise, alongside lack of humor, poor acting, low grade special effects, incoherent screenplay, poorly lit scenes and dearth of interesting characters.<ref name="Harvey 2023">{{cite web |last=Harvey |first=Dennis |title='Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: An Un-Bear-Able Horror Cheapie |url=https://variety.com/2023/film/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review-1235524780/ |website=] |access-date=17 February 2023 |date=16 February 2023 |archive-date=16 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216095917/https://variety.com/2023/film/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-review-1235524780/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Allen 2023">{{cite web |last=Allen |first=Nick |title=Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-movie-review-2023 |website=] |access-date=17 February 2023 |date=16 February 2023 |archive-date=16 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230216172442/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-movie-review-2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> Nathan Rabin stated that the film was "the regrettable product of a loophole in copyright law that allowed these vultures to twist and distort and corrupt A.A. Milne's beloved icons of gentleness and childhood innocence to their own mercenary ends."<ref name="winnierabin">{{cite web |last=Rabin |first=Nathan |author-link=Nathan Rabin |title=I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey |url=https://nathanrabin.substack.com/p/i-hated-hated-hated-winnie-the-pooh |website=Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas |access-date=March 11, 2024 |date=20 February 2023}}</ref> Rabin issued his first zero star review for the film, in which he referenced Roger Ebert's 1994 review of ''North''<ref name="northebert">{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Ebert|title=North movie review & film summary (1994) |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/north-1994 |website=] |date=July 22, 1994 |access-date=April 8, 2024 |language=en}}</ref> by stating: "I Hated, Hated, Hated ''Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey''."<ref name="winnierabin"/> With a score of 3%, it appears on Rotten Tomatoes' 100 Worst Movies of All Time list.<ref name="rt100worst">{{cite web |title=Bad Movies: The 100 Worst Movies of All Time |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/worst-movies-of-all-time/ |website=] |publisher=] |access-date=March 10, 2024}}</ref> '']'' later placed it at the top of their 10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have to See to Know They're Bad list.<ref name="terrible10">{{cite web |last=Walters |first=Jack |title=10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have To See To Know They're Bad |url=https://screenrant.com/terrible-movies-not-see-know-bad/ |website=] |access-date=March 29, 2024 |language=en |date=26 July 2023}}</ref> | |||
Shawn Paul Wood of ''The Cinema Spot'' wrote, "As anyone can tell, ''Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey'' is one of the worst movies ever made. And, by the looks of its dazzling lack of antipathy for protecting its copyright, Disney knew it."<ref>{{cite web |last=Wood |first=Shawn Paul |title=Bearly Watchable 'Winnie the Pooh: Blood And Honey' Dared Disney To Stop It |url=https://www.thecinemaspot.com/2023/11/12/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-dared-disney-to-stop-it |website=The Cinema Spot |access-date=March 10, 2024 |date=November 12, 2023}}</ref> Matt Villei of '']'' wrote, "If these reviews are anything to go by, the film might find itself in a spot of bother as it is being called one of the worst horror movies ever, though some predicted that, from its low quality, the film could garner a cult following similar to Tommy Wiseau's disasterpiece, ''The Room''."<ref>{{cite web |last=Villei |first=Matt |title=First 'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Reactions Call It "Stifled," "So Bad It's Good," and the Worst Movie Ever |url=https://collider.com/winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-reactions-is-it-good/ |website=] |access-date=March 10, 2024 |language=en |date=February 16, 2023}}</ref> It received all five Razzies that it was nominated for at the ], including Worst Picture, Screenplay and Director (]).<ref>{{cite web |last=Phillips |first=Zoe G. |title=Razzie Awards: 'Winnie The Pooh: Blood and Honey' Sweeps Its Five Nominated Categories |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/razzie-awards-winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-sweeps-1235846272/ |website=] |access-date=March 10, 2024 |date=March 9, 2024}}</ref> | |||
], the current voice actor for Pooh and Tigger, has also openly bashed the movie in an interview, calling it "absolutely disgusting", as well as threatening the film makers with legal action if they dared to use or imitate his voice for their version of the title character.<ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgba1c4MAoA |title=Jim Cummings Talks Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey |date=2022-07-16 |last=Kyrill Panasenko |access-date=2025-01-18 |via=YouTube}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
{{portal|Film|Lists}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
==References== | == References == | ||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist}} | ||
== |
===Works cited=== | ||
{{refbegin|35em|indent=yes}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |first=Michael |last=Adams |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2AeL09OCjLEC |title=Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies: a film critic's year-long quest to find the worst movie ever made |location=New York |publisher=Itbooks |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-06-180629-2 |ref={{SfnRef|Adams}}}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last=Maltin |first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Maltin |title=] |publisher=Signet |year=2003 |isbn=0-451-20940-0 }} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last=Medved |first=Harry |title =] |publisher =] |year =1978 |isbn =0-445-04139-0}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last=Medved |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Medved |title =] |publisher =] |year =1980 |isbn =0-399-50463-X |ref={{SfnRef|Golden Turkey Awards}}}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last=Sauter |first=Michael |title =The Worst Movies of All Time, or, What Were They Thinking? |publisher =] |year =1999 |isbn =0-8065-2078-7 |ref={{SfnRef|Sauter}}}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Wallechinsky |first1=David |author-link1=David Wallechinsky |last2=Wallace |first2=Irving |author-link2=Irving Wallace |last3=Wallace |first3=Amy |author-link3=Amy Wallace |title=] |year=1977|publisher=]|isbn=978-0688031831|ref={{SfnRef|Book of Lists}}}} | |||
* | |||
* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=John |author-link=John J. B. Wilson |title=] |year=2005|publisher=]|isbn=0-446-69334-0}} | |||
* | |||
{{refend}} | |||
== External links == | |||
{{Worst works}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* (user scores) | |||
{{Worst works}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:List Of Films Considered The Worst}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Films considered the worst}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:58, 18 January 2025
For the 2011 American action comedy, see The Worst Movie Ever!
This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.
The films listed below have been cited by a variety of notable critics in varying media sources as being among the worst films ever made. Examples of such sources include Metacritic, Roger Ebert's list of most-hated films, The Golden Turkey Awards, Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Rotten Tomatoes, pop culture writer Nathan Rabin's My World of Flops, the Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the cult TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000 (alongside spinoffs Cinematic Titanic, The Film Crew and RiffTrax), and the Golden Raspberry Awards (aka the "Razzies"). Films on these lists are generally feature-length films that are commercial/artistic in nature (intended to turn a profit, express personal statements or both), professionally or independently produced (as opposed to amateur productions, such as home movies), and released in theaters, then on home video.
1930s
Maniac (1934)
Main article: Maniac (1934 film)Maniac, also known as Sex Maniac, is a pre-Code exploitation-horror film directed by Dwain Esper. The story is a loose adaptation of the Edgar Allan Poe story "The Black Cat" and follows a vaudeville impersonator who becomes an assistant to a mad scientist. Promoted as a documentary on mental illness, Maniac was criticized for its gratuitous footage of women undressing and for plagiarizing horror sequences from the 1922 silent film Häxan. Danny Peary believes that Maniac is the worst film ever made, and Charlie Jane Anders of Gawker Media's io9 described it as "possibly the worst movie in history." Rotten Tomatoes placed Maniac on its list of movies "So Bad They're Unmissable", Vanity Fair included the film on its list of the 20 worst movies ever and it is featured in John J. B. Wilson's book The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst.
Reefer Madness (1936)
Main article: Reefer MadnessReefer Madness (originally released as Tell Your Children and sometimes titled or subtitled as The Burning Question, Dope Addict, Doped Youth, and Love Madness) is a 1936 American exploitation film and propaganda work revolving around the melodramatic events that ensue when high school students are lured by pushers to smoke cannabis— and consequently become addicted and involved in various crimes such as a hit and run accident, manslaughter, murder, attempted rape, and descent into madness, association with organized crime and suicide.
Pacific Standard wrote that Reefer Madness was "one of the first films ever to be considered transcendentally bad" and Leonard Maltin has called it "the grand-daddy of all 'Worst' movies". Las Vegas CityLife named it the "worst ever" runner-up to Plan 9 from Outer Space, and News.com.au considered it a "disastrous flop turned cult classic" due to its "terrible acting and exaggerated drug-addicted stereotypes". Natalli Amato of The Daily Dot included Reefer Madness on her list of the best worst movies, writing that it "may be one of the worst movies of all time for the fact that it accomplished the exact opposite of its intended goal" by becoming a cult classic among stoners. Leafly's Danté Jordan also wrote that it may be "the worst movie of all time", criticizing its many inaccuracies regarding marijuana use and calling it "easily one of the most uncreative and tone-deaf pieces of anti-cannabis propaganda".
The Terror of Tiny Town (1938)
Main article: The Terror of Tiny TownThe Terror of Tiny Town, directed by Sam Newfield and produced by Jed Buell, remains the only musical Western with an all-dwarf cast. The film was pulled from obscurity as a camp classic after appearing in college and midnight screenings in the early 1970s. In 1978, it was included in Michael Medved's book, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time, and has since been listed as one of the worst films ever made, by Flavorwire, Rotten Tomatoes, and The Golden Turkey Awards. Melvin Defleur referred to it as "Perhaps the worst film of all time", and critic Gabriel Ricard listed it as the worst film ever made; stating, "not only is it pretty terrible, but Tiny Town is also pretty endearing." In 1986, The Terror of Tiny Town was the first film featured on Canned Film Festival, a late night television show featuring the worst movies ever made.
1940s
The Babe Ruth Story (1948)
Main article: The Babe Ruth StoryThe Babe Ruth Story is a 1948 baseball film biography of Babe Ruth, starring William Bendix, Claire Trevor and Sam Levene. The New York Times describes it as "the Plan 9 from Outer Space of baseball biopics". It was rushed into release while Ruth was still alive. One infamous scene features Ruth promising a dying child that he will hit two home runs. The child is subsequently cured of his ailments after Ruth delivers on the promise.
Baseball Hall of Famer Ted Williams believed it to be the worst movie he had ever seen. The Washington Times stated that it "stands as possibly the worst movie ever made". The Spokesman-Review included the film on its list of the worst films of all time, while Paul Newberry of the Associated Press wrote that the film's place on "nearly every list of the worst movies ever made" was "with good reason". Newsday's Jack Mathews similarly wrote that The Babe Ruth Story was "what many people consider to be the worst sports movie of all time". It also was called one of the worst sports films ever each by Newsday and The A.V. Club, and called one of the worst biopics by Moviefone and Spike. Entertainment writer Michael Sauter included the film in his book, The Worst Movies of All Time, and Leonard Maltin called it "perfectly dreadful".
No Orchids for Miss Blandish (1948)
Main article: No Orchids for Miss Blandish (film)No Orchids for Miss Blandish, a British gangster film adapted from the 1939 novel by James Hadley Chase, received a very hostile reception from the press. This was mainly due to the film's high (for the time) level of sexual and violent content, but also because its attempt to portray Americans using a largely British cast (including an early role for Sid James) was seen as unconvincing.
The British film journal Monthly Film Bulletin called it "the most sickening exhibition of brutality, perversion, sex and sadism ever to be shown on a cinema screen". The Sunday Express film reviewer called No Orchids for Miss Blandish "the worst film I have ever seen". The Australian newspaper The Age also gave a harsh review: "No Orchids for Miss Blandish is not only a disgrace to the studio that made it, but it also reflects on the British industry as a whole ... the entire production is unpardonable."
Cliff Goodwin, discussing No Orchids for Miss Blandish's initial reception, notes it was "unanimously dubbed 'the worst film ever made'". Later reviews of the film were equally antipathetic. No Orchids for Miss Blandish was described by British film reviewer Leslie Halliwell as a "hilariously awful gangster film ... one of the worst films ever made". Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide states that No Orchids for Miss Blandish "aspires to be a Hollywood film noir and misses by a mile."
1950s
Glen or Glenda (1953)
Main article: Glen or GlendaGlen or Glenda starred Ed Wood as Glen, a transvestite who cross-dresses as Glenda. Wood also directed the film. After a dream sequence, Glen undergoes psychotherapy to help "cure" him of his transvestism.
Leonard Maltin wrote that Glen or Glenda was worse than Wood's later Plan 9 from Outer Space and considered it "possibly the worst movie ever made". Julien Allen of Reverse Shot similarly wrote that it was "widely considered to be an atrocity" and "the most catastrophic failure of singularly bad career". Richard Barrios described Glen or Glenda as "one of the funniest and worst movies ever made".
Robot Monster (1953)
Main article: Robot MonsterRobot Monster is a science-fiction film produced and directed by Phil Tucker and originally shot and exhibited in 3D. Its title character, which is "a man in a gorilla suit wearing what looks like a diving helmet sprouting TV antennae", was given the Most Ridiculous Monster in Screen History award in The Golden Turkey Awards. It is also featured in The Book of Lists' 10 worst movies list, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time and Michael Sauter's book The Worst Movies of All Time. Robot Monster was featured in an episode of the movie-mocking TV show Mystery Science Theater 3000, as well as Canned Film Festival. The film is remembered fondly by horror novelist Stephen King, who quotes, and agrees with, a review in Castle of Frankenstein magazine ("certainly among the finest terrible movies ever made", "one of the most laughable poverty row quickies"). Chris Barsanti in The Sci-Fi Movie Guide writes: " gives Plan 9 From Outer Space a run as the worst movie of all time."
The Conqueror (1956)
Main article: The Conqueror (1956 film)Howard Hughes funded The Conqueror, an epic film featuring John Wayne as Mongolian chieftain Genghis Khan and the redheaded Susan Hayward as a Tatar princess. The movie was filmed near St. George, Utah, downwind from a nuclear testing range in Nevada, and is often blamed for the cancer deaths of many of the cast and crew, including Hayward, Wayne, Agnes Moorehead, Pedro Armendáriz, and director Dick Powell. In addition to filming near the testing range, truckloads of the red sands were transported back to the studios for interior scenes and by 1980, 91 of the 220 (over 41%) cast and crew members had been diagnosed with cancer.
The film made the ten-worst list in The Book of Lists, appears in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time, and was among those listed in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time. Additionally, the Aldergrove Star described The Conqueror as the worst ever made and Complex listed it as the worst biopic ever made. The Guardian called the choice of Wayne for Khan – a role originally written for Marlon Brando – "one of the worst casting decisions of all time". Wayne lamented taking the role, stating, "Don't make an ass of yourself trying to play parts you are not suited for." The Daily Telegraph writes: "by absolutely every conceivable metric – financially, critically, historically, ethnically, and even body count – it would come to be known as one of the biggest disasters in cinematic history." Rolling Stone described the film as the worst decision in movie history.
Hughes, one of the world's wealthiest people at the time, had previously produced the successful dramatic films Hell's Angels, Scarface, and The Outlaw. After viewing The Conqueror, Hughes bought every existing print for $12 million and refused to let the film be seen on TV until 1974, reportedly out of guilt over the decision to shoot at such a hazardous location. This was the last film Hughes produced.
Fire Maidens from Outer Space (1956)
Main article: Fire Maidens from Outer SpaceFire Maidens from Outer Space, a low-budget British space opera film (known in the US as Fire Maidens of Outer Space), is about a group of astronauts visiting an all-female society on a moon of Jupiter. This film developed a negative reputation for its poor special effects (including a scene on the alien planet in which an automobile is visible driving past). Leslie Halliwell described Fire Maidens from Outer Space as "a strong contender for the title of the worst movie ever made, with diaphanously clad English gals striking embarrassed poses against cardboard sets". British film historian I.Q. Hunter included it in his list of candidates for "the worst British film ever made". The DVD Talk website's review claimed it "may be among the worst-ever professionally produced science fiction films". Paul Welsh of the Borehamwood & Elstree Times wrote that it was "probably the worst ever produced". In his book Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies, David L. Robb wrote that the film's director Cy Roth is "widely regarded as one of the worst filmmakers of all time", adding that, out of the three films he made, "the worst was Fire Maidens from Outer Space...which is often cited as one of the ten worst movies ever made".
Plan 9 from Outer Space (1957)
Main article: Plan 9 from Outer SpaceEd Wood's Plan 9 from Outer Space, a science fiction film about aliens resurrecting the dead, was labeled the "Worst Film Ever" by The Golden Turkey Awards in 1980. Wood shot only a small amount of unrelated footage featuring top-billed star Bela Lugosi before his death. Wood incorporated the footage into the film and cast Tom Mason as Lugosi's stand-in; Mason, a personal acquaintance of Wood, bore little resemblance to Lugosi and played his scenes holding the character's cape in front of his face. Although Golden Turkey Awards author Michael Medved credits Lugosi's top billing with its enduring legacy, The Independent listed various other shortcomings: "A UFO dangling in the sky has been variously said to be either a car hubcap or a paper plate. Actors read from scripts on their lap; sound microphones wobble in and out of shot. Fake trees and cemetery headstones wobble as the actors brush past them. Characters go into scenes when it's night time and leave five minutes later into daylight. ... the plot itself appears to be the product of insanity."
Emanuel Levy notes the film has been dubbed "the epitome of so-bad-it's-good cinema" and has gained a cult following since appearing in The Golden Turkey Awards. My Year of Flops author Nathan Rabin wrote that: "It's hard to overstate the role Plan 9 From Outer Space and its eccentric creator have played in the birth and evolution of bad movie culture... Plan 9 was the original best worst movie." BBC writer Nicholas Barber wrote that "it stands as the epitome of cinematic awfulness. And that's why so many people love it." Glenn Kenny of RogerEbert.com and The Radio Times Guide to Films each described it as the worst movie ever made, and IGN wrote: "Plan 9 from Outer Space was the undisputed best worst movie ever made for decades until films like Troll 2 and The Room got notorious, and it's still a legitimate contender".
It holds a 66% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 38 reviews, with the consensus stating that it is "justly celebrated for its staggering ineptitude". Phil Hall of Film Threat contends that the film is "far too entertaining to be considered as the very worst film ever made", and Kim Newman states that, "The worst thing you can say about a film is that it's boring, and Plan 9 is a fairly entertaining movie." Although Flavorwire included it on its list of the 50 worst movies ever made (in the 50th spot), writer Jason Bailey described The Golden Turkey Awards's assessment of it as "a label that stuck" and opined that he did not think it was even Wood's worst film. Likewise, John Wirt of The Advocate goes as far as to call it "the ultimate cult flick", and Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics states, "In fact, the film has become so famous for its own badness that it's now beyond criticism." Barber credits Plan 9's cult following to the film having some "halfway decent" elements, such as the film's title and screen presence of actors Tor Johnson and Maila Nurmi, while film historian Rodney F. Hill considers the film to be a "campy, cult masterpiece" with a "minimalist avant-garde aesthetic".
1960s
The Creeping Terror (1964)
Main article: The Creeping TerrorThe science-fiction/horror film The Creeping Terror was directed, produced, and edited by Vic Savage (under the pseudonym A.J. Nelson or Arthur Nelson, but kept his name when credited as an actor). The movie is about a large slug-like alien that lands on Earth and terrorizes a small town in California. The film is memorable for its use of some bargain-basement effects: stock footage of a rocket launch played in reverse to depict the landing of an alien spacecraft, and the "monster" appears to be composed of a length of shag carpet draped over several actors. Notably, the creature's victims inexplicably stand perfectly still as the slow-moving monster approaches them.
ComingSoon.net declared it "widely considered the worst picture ever made", calling Plan 9 From Outer Space "a bona fide magnum opus" compared to The Creeping Terror. Montreal Gazette and Dread Central also report that it has a reputation as being one of the worst films ever made. The film was featured in The Golden Turkey Awards, and its follow-up book, Son of Golden Turkey Awards. Mystery Science Theater 3000 featured The Creeping Terror in its sixth season and British film magazine Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.
A documentary directed by Pete Schuermann about the making of the film, The Creep Behind The Camera, was released in 2014.
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
Main article: Santa Claus Conquers the MartiansThe sci-fi movie Santa Claus Conquers the Martians was the creation of TV director Nicholas Webster. Because Martian children only get to see Santa Claus on TV signals beamed from Earth, their parents decide to abduct Santa to make them happy. The film was criticized for its oddity and poor special effects. It is also known for starring a very young Pia Zadora. BBC critic Nick Cramp described it as "possibly the worst film ever made". The film is cited on a 10-worst list in The Book of Lists and in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time. It has been featured in Mystery Science Theater 3000, Canned Film Festival, Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic (another spin-off of MST3K that revisited the film in 2008).
The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (1964)
Main article: The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up ZombiesThe Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (sometimes shortened to The Incredibly Strange Creatures) is a 1964 American monster movie written and directed by Ray Dennis Steckler. Steckler also starred in the film, billed under the pseudonym "Cash Flagg". In the film, three friends visit a carnival and stumble onto a group of occultists and disfigured monsters. Produced on a $38,000 budget, much of it takes place at The Pike amusement park in Long Beach, California, which resembles Brooklyn's Coney Island. The film was billed as the first "monster musical", beating out The Horror of Party Beach by a mere month in release date. The music critic Lester Bangs wrote an appreciative 1973 essay about Incredibly Strange Creatures in which he tries to explain and justify the movie's value: "This flick doesn't just rebel against, or even disregard, standards of taste and art. In the universe inhabited by The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, such things as standards and responsibility have never been heard of. It is this lunar purity which largely imparts to the film its classic stature. Like Beyond the Valley of the Dolls and a very few others, it will remain as an artifact in years to come to which scholars and searchers for truth can turn and say, 'This was trash!'" The 2004 DVD The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made listed this film as the worst film of all time. Time Out and Flavorwire included it on their respective worst film lists.
Monster a Go-Go! (1965)
Main article: Monster a Go-Go!Monster a Go-Go! began as Terror at Halfday by Bill Rebane. The production ran out of money and the film was abandoned. Herschell Gordon Lewis, who reportedly needed a second feature to compose a double bill, purchased and completed it for a minimal amount of money. Several of the film's actors were unable to return, so Lewis simply replaced their parts with new characters who mysteriously appear and fill the roles of the missing characters. One of the actors Lewis managed to rehire had gained weight, gone bald, and grown a goatee, so Lewis recast him as the brother of the original character. The picture consists mostly of lengthy dialogue sequences concerning the apparent mutation of an astronaut into a monster portrayed by the 231-cm-tall (7 ft 6¾ in) Henry Hite. Poor audio quality makes much of the dialogue unintelligible, and when the film is overexposed, several characters' faces appear as bright white, glowing circles. During the climax of the movie, as soldiers prepare to confront the mutated astronaut, he abruptly vanishes and the narrator informs the audience, "there was no monster", and that the astronaut has, in fact, been in the Atlantic Ocean the entire time.
NJ.com notes that many cinemaphiles consider it to be the worst film of all time, including the film's original director Rebane. Matt Brunson of Film Frenzy agrees with its designation as one of the worst films ever made, stating it belongs in the "exalted pantheon of immortal atrocities like Plan 9 from Outer Space, Robot Monster and Manos: The Hands of Fate." Meanwhile, MovieWeb writer B. Alan Orange believes it to be the second-worst movie ever made, after Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2. It was also featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000, where writer Paul Chaplin called the dialogue "garbled beyond recognition" and declared it to be the worst movie they ever featured on the program. Total Film later included it on its list of the worst films ever made.
Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)
Main article: Manos: The Hands of FateThe low-budget horror film Manos: The Hands of Fate, made by El Paso insurance and fertilizer salesman Hal P. Warren, concerns a vacationing family kidnapped by a polygamous cult of pagans. The film was conceived after Warren bet Academy Award-winning screenwriter Stirling Silliphant that anyone could make a horror movie. Warren was convinced by the film's cinematographer and stunt coordinator that most of its glaring mistakes could be fixed in a Dallas post-production studio, when in reality the two wanted to quickly wrap the production because they were not being paid. Several technical gaffes made it into the film, including scenes filmed out of focus, a marking slate being seen in one shot, the scarf on the female lead's head disappearing and reappearing, and an insect bumping the camera lens. The film was shot with a camera that could not record sound and had a 32-second maximum shot length. All dialogue was later dubbed by Warren and four others, including a grown woman who dubbed the voice for a seven-year-old girl.
Manos opens with nine minutes of monotonous driving scenes reportedly intended to be overlaid with opening credits that were never added. The movie includes dialogue spoken while all characters are facing away from the camera, a character complaining about it getting dark while the sun is brightly shining, and the character Torgo, a satyr with overly large thighs, that three women attempt to massage to death. The film gained notoriety and cult popularity by being featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000, and was the show's most popular episode. The film has a rare 0% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and Entertainment Weekly says the movie is "widely regarded as, quite simply, the worst movie ever made". Even Warren himself would later admit his film was one of the worst ever, suggesting it might make a passable comedy if redubbed. The film was later restored and released on Blu-ray in 2015.
A Place for Lovers (1968)
Main article: A Place for LoversA Place for Lovers is a French-Italian romantic film directed by Vittorio De Sica (a filmmaker known for acclaimed neorealist works, such as Umberto D and The Bicycle Thieves), starring Faye Dunaway as a terminally ill American fashion designer in Venice, Italy, and Marcello Mastroianni as a race car driver who has a whirlwind affair with her. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times called it the "most godawful piece of pseudo-romantic slop I've ever seen!" and Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times referred to it as "the worst movie I have seen all year and possibly since 1926". Leonard Maltin noted Ebert's comments in his review, and offered that the film was "low points for all concerned". A Place for Lovers was included as one of the choices in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time, and Vanity Fair listed it as one of the 20 worst movies ever made.
They Saved Hitler's Brain (1968)
Main article: They Saved Hitler's BrainThey Saved Hitler's Brain is a science fiction film directed by David Bradley. It was adapted for TV from a shorter 1963 theatrical feature film, Madmen of Mandoras, and was lengthened by about 20 minutes with additional footage shot by UCLA students at the request of the distributor. In the film, Adolf Hitler's head was severed from his body at the end of World War II and the head plans to rule over a new Third Reich from South America. It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on five reviews from critics, with an average rating of 1.3/10. TV Guide called it "One of the all-time worst", while Danny Peary said it was "A legitimate candidate for Worst Film Ever Made title." In 1979, it won the World's Worst Film Festival in Ottawa, Canada, which reportedly delighted Bradley. It has been featured in The Golden Turkey Awards and Canned Film Festival, and has been spoofed on The Simpsons multiple times.
1970s
Myra Breckinridge (1970)
Main article: Myra Breckinridge (film)The 1970 comedy film Myra Breckinridge, based on the book of the same name by Gore Vidal, directed by Michael Sarne and starring Raquel Welch, Rex Reed, Mae West, John Huston and Farrah Fawcett, provoked controversy due to a scene in which Welch forcibly sodomizes a bound man while clips from various classic films play onscreen. The film was initially rated X before edits and an appeal to the MPAA brought it down to an R. It also used the technique of inserting clips from Golden Age movies in such a way that the dialogue took on sexual undertones. The film was a critical failure, with Time magazine saying, "Myra Breckinridge is about as funny as a child molester." Leonard Maltin gave it a BOMB (the lowest score possible) and stated that it was "as bad as any movie ever made". The Miami News critic Herb Kelly nominated Myra Breckinridge as the worst film ever made. It was also included in The Book of Lists' worst movies of all time, which claimed that there was something in it to offend absolutely everyone. Likewise, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time and Vanity Fair also listed it as one of the worst movies ever made. Gore Vidal disowned it, calling it "an awful joke", and blamed the movie for a decade-long drought in the sale of the original book.
Zaat (1971)
Main article: ZaatDirected by Don Barton, Zaat was also known under various titles including Hydra, Attack of the Swamp Creatures, Legend of the Zaat Monster, and The Blood Waters of Dr. Z (the name under which it was lampooned on Mystery Science Theater 3000). The film follows a Nazi mad scientist who injects himself with a formula that turns him into a mutated catfish. Florida Times-Union critic Matt Soergel quipped that Zaat "could very well be the best film ever made about a mutated catfish". Critic Jeffrey Kauffman said, "this is the sort of film Ed Wood, Jr. might have made—on a bad day" and added, "Lovers of fantastically bad films rate Zaat one of the worst". Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "The acting in Zaat is below subpar. Actors seem to be whispering their lines and trying hard not to fully comprehend that they're in one of the worst films ever made", while Michael Rubino of DVD Verdict also claimed, "Zaat may be one of the worst films ever created". NPR called it a "sci-fi fiasco" when it became "the winner — er, loser —" on IMDb's Bottom 100. Zaat appeared on Mystery Science Theater 3000, which gave it significant exposure, and was also featured on RedLetterMedia's show Half in the Bag where the hosts called it one of their favorite "so bad it's good" films. Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.
An American Hippie in Israel (1972)
Main article: An American Hippie in IsraelThe 1972 Israeli film An American Hippie in Israel is about an American hippie traveling to Israel after being involved with the Vietnam War, befriending Israeli flower children, and encountering "menacing" mimes along the way. The film was presumed lost, but after resurfacing 38 years after its production, it became a "midnight sensation" in Tel Aviv and developed a cult following akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show. It was then released internationally on home video by Grindhouse Releasing. Gil Shefler of The Jewish Daily Forward described it as "perfectly awful", offering that it "probably is the worst Israeli movie ever made, and a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time". Its description as "a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time" was echoed by Josh Olson in IndieWire. Ben Hartman of The Jerusalem Post stated the film was "surely one of the worst films ever made in Israel, or beyond". Nana 10 said it claims the title of "worst Israeli film and most amusing".
Bat Pussy (circa 1973)
Main article: Bat PussyA loose spoof of the 1966 Batman television series cited as one of the earliest examples of a pornographic parody film, the presumably-1970s pornographic film Bat Pussy has been described as the worst pornographic film ever made due to "some incredibly unarousing sex and a general attitude of awfulness". Possessing no credits or copyright information, there is no known record of Bat Pussy's existence prior to the mid-1990s, when it was discovered in the storeroom of an adult movie theater in Memphis, Tennessee, and subsequently released on home video by exploitation film distributor Something Weird Video. Gawker Media's io9 proclaimed the film to be "the absolute nadir of pornography, period. Not just Batman-themed pornography. ALL pornography", deriding its "obese redneck" cast as rendering the film "wank-proof". PornParody.com, a website dedicated to the genre, acknowledged its status as "the worst adult movie of all time", describing Bat Pussy as "renowned for its technical ineptness and anti-eroticism" due to its "physically unappealing" actors. AV Maniacs contested Bat Pussy's categorization as pornography on the grounds of the lead actor's visible erectile dysfunction and instead labeled the film "anti-porn", asking "How else do you categorize an adult film that completely and utterly fails to elicit even the minutest amount of arousal in its viewers?" The book The Many More Lives of Batman by William Uricchio and Will Brooker also labeled Bat Pussy "the worst porn film ever made", criticizing its poor adaptation of the source material.
At Long Last Love (theatrical version, 1975)
Main article: At Long Last LoveAt Long Last Love was renowned director Peter Bogdanovich's musical homage to great 1930s Hollywood musicals. It features songs by Cole Porter and stars Cybill Shepherd and Burt Reynolds. Film Threat wrote that it received "the most withering reviews any film ever received", while The Guardian reported that it was "savaged by critics at the time and viewed as one of the worst films ever". Richard Brody of The New Yorker compared it to the later critical failures of Heaven's Gate and Ishtar, writing: "critics of the time heaven's-gated , leaving Bogdanovich ishtarred and feathered". Such reviews included Hollis Alpert's, in which he said that "This failure is so dismal that it goes beyond failure", and Esquire critic John Simon's, who said that "it may be the worst movie musical of this – or any – decade". Meanwhile, Buffalo News film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time." Bogdanovich, who was also the screenwriter, sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for the film.
CNN later noted that it had attained a legacy as being "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history", and Jay Cocks has said the film was "regarded as the great white elephant catastrophe of its time". Lester J. Keyser wrote that it was "justly included on most lists of the ten worst films ever made", as it was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Films of All Time, The Golden Turkey Awards and Vanity Fair's worst film list.
Bogdanovich lamented being influenced by studio previews to cut the film before its theatrical release. Unbeknownst to Bogdanovich, a studio editor who preferred the director's first cut constructed his own based on the test screening version that he once had access to. This version subsequently aired on cable TV and streamed on Netflix in place of the theatrical cut. When news of this reached Bogdanovich, he contacted Fox and made a few finishing touches, resulting in a better received director's cut that debuted on home video in 2013.
Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977)
Main article: Exorcist II: The HereticExorcist II: The Heretic is the sequel to William Friedkin's Oscar-winning 1973 film, this time directed by John Boorman. Friedkin opted not to return to direct the sequel and The Daily Telegraph states that Boorman "hated the original" and intended The Heretic to be an "antidote to wash away the evil of Friedkin's film." Set four years after the first film, Linda Blair reprised her role as Regan MacNeil, who is revealed to have healing powers, and Richard Burton stars as Father Philip Lamont, who believes that the demon Pazuzu targets those with healing abilities. Blair agreed to return for the sequel as long as she did not have to wear the possession make-up from the first film, leading to the use of an unconvincing stand-in, while Burton read his lines off cue cards. Despite his character dying in the original film, Max von Sydow returned for flashback sequences set in Africa, where Lamont flies to on the back of a locust.
The Daily Telegraph notes that some consider it the worst film ever made. British film critic Mark Kermode called the original film his favorite film of all time but believes the sequel to be the worst film ever made, stating, "This is a film that trashes a work of art. It's like someone deciding to do a Mona Lisa 2, but with a moustache." The Golden Turkey Awards named it the second-worst film ever made, after Plan 9 from Outer Space, and it also appeared in The Official Razzie Movie Guide. The A.V. Club listed it as the worst sequel of all time and critic Bill Chambers stated it was "Possibly the worst film ever made and surely the worst sequel ever made." Friedkin believed the sequel diminished the value of the original film and called it "the worst piece of shit I've ever seen" and "a fucking disgrace." Eventually, the film garnered so much hate that Boorman disowned it. In an interview with Bob McCabe for the book The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows, he confessed, "The sin I committed was not giving the audience what it wanted in terms of horror." A third installment in the Exorcist franchise, The Exorcist III: Legion, was released in 1990 and would in later years gain a cult following, with author Nat Segaloff writing that, "The first rule of Exorcist III is: you do not talk about Exorcist II."
The Swarm (1978)
Main article: The Swarm (1978 film)The Swarm is a 1978 horror film about a killer bee invasion of Texas, directed and produced by Irwin Allen. Despite its all-star cast (including Michael Caine, Henry Fonda, Richard Widmark and Olivia de Havilland), it was a box-office failure and was excoriated by reviewers. On its UK release, The Sunday Times described The Swarm as "simply the worst film ever made". Leslie Halliwell described it as a "very obvious disaster movie with risible dialogue". The Guardian article on The Swarm stated, "You could pass it all off as a sick joke, except it cost twelve million dollars, twenty-two million bees, and several years of someone's life." Barry Took, reviewing it for Punch, stated, "the story is of a banality matched only by the woodenness of the acting". Time Out magazine called The Swarm a "risibly inadequate disaster movie". The Swarm is included in several "worst movie" books, including the Medved brothers' The Golden Turkey Awards, and The Official Razzie Movie Guide. It soon gained a cult status (enough so that Warner Archive released the extended version on Blu-ray).
I Spit on Your Grave (1978)
Main article: I Spit on Your GraveI Spit on Your Grave became controversial for its graphic violence and lengthy depictions of gang rape. It was initially unable to find a distributor until 1980 when it received a wider release. Luke Y. Thompson of the New Times stated, "Defenders of the film have argued that it's actually pro-woman, due to the fact that the female lead wins in the end, which is sort of like saying that cockfights are pro-rooster because there's always one left standing". Critic David Keyes named I Spit on Your Grave the worst film of the 1980s and James Livingston wrote in The World Turned Inside Out that it was "a terrifically bad movie". Scott Tobias of The A.V. Club called it "one of the era's most abhorrent pieces of exploitation trash" and Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "It's one of the most soulless, vile, and morally reprehensible things I've ever had to sit through." Roger Ebert gave the film no stars, referring to it as "A vile bag of garbage ... without a shred of artistic distinction," adding, "Attending it was one of the most depressing experiences of my life" and considered it the worst movie ever made. Gene Siskel also considered it one of the worst films ever made. Film Racket featured it as their first entry in to their "Worst Movie Ever?" series, while Vanity Fair and Flavorwire included it in their worst film lists. Despite the intense negative reception from some critics, the film has a 53% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with IGN critic R.L. Shaffer arguing that whether the film is repulsive and exploitative or ingenious depends on what the viewer wants from the movie: "Admittedly, I Spit on Your Grave is a gruesome, deplorable little exploitation picture that, on the surface, seems to enjoy its rape sequences just as much, if not more, than the vengeance-filled finale. But on a more subtle level, the film is a surprisingly well-executed revenge story that plays like a brutally raw nerve – a terrifyingly stark view of the real horror of rape, painted by bizarre, skewed cinematography, gory violence, and a keen sense of creeping atmosphere and dread."
Caligula (theatrical version, 1979)
Main article: Caligula (film)The 1979 erotic historical drama Caligula, directed by Tinto Brass about the infamous Roman Emperor Caligula, was in part financed by Penthouse founder Bob Guccione. The film, featuring a prestigious cast (Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O'Toole, and John Gielgud) is notorious for explicit scenes of sex and violence, including six minutes of hardcore porn footage filmed by Guccione and another editor without Brass' approval. Caligula earned some pre-release controversy after Gore Vidal, who had written the script, distanced himself from the film, and actress Maria Schneider, who objected to the nude scenes, walked off the set and was replaced with then-unknown Teresa Ann Savoy. Upon its release, Vidal stated that it was "easily one of the worst films ever made".
Caligula also received strongly hostile reviews from critics, who denounced its extreme scenes of sex and violence and lack of narrative coherence. Roger Ebert gave Caligula a zero-star rating, dubbing it "sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash", accusing it of being artistically vulgar in its depiction of sex and violence, and of having technically incompetent direction and structure. It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out on (two hours into its 170-minute running time), after describing himself as feeling "disgusted and unspeakably depressed". Ebert also placed it on his "Most Hated" list and Michael Sauter selected it for The Worst Movies of All Time. Australian newspaper The Age stated that Caligula was being "billed by critics everywhere as one of the worst films ever made". The Hamilton Spectator later referred to Caligula as "possibly the worst movie ever made". Joe Holleman, in an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch discussing historical films set in Ancient Rome, argued, "two of the worst movies made in the 20th century were ancient Rome pieces ... Cleopatra and Caligula". Christopher Armstead, reviewing Caligula for the website Film Critics United, stated, "Dollar for dollar, this could very well be the worst movie ever made." In 2011, Sean Bell of PopMatters wrote of its enduring legacy: "in the same way much of our attention-deficit civilisation may go through life vaguely aware that Citizen Kane is a masterpiece without ever seeing it, ... we know that Caligula is awful, usually without ever finding out for ourselves."
Although widely criticized, the film's "over-the-top combination of outré aesthetics exploitation-film tropes" has gained it cult status over time, and in 2024, Thomas Negovan released an extensive re-edit, Caligula: The Ultimate Cut, incorporating alternate takes and unused footage from the Penthouse archives to enhance narrative coherence while shortening the film's overall length. In a review in The New York Times, Elisabeth Vincentelli said that it is a "rare re-edited version of a movie that features less graphic sex and violence than the original." In an interview with The Guardian, McDowell praised the removal of sexually explicit material added by Guccione, and said The Ultimate Cut is "very much the movie I thought I was making"." The Ultimate Cut holds an 64% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 39 reviews; however, Brass has publicly disowned it.
1980s
Heaven's Gate (theatrical version, 1980)
Main article: Heaven's Gate (film)The Western epic Heaven's Gate, loosely based on the Johnson County War in 1890s Wyoming, was plagued by massive cost and time overruns, largely due to director Michael Cimino's extreme attention to detail. He demanded 50 takes of at least one scene and refused to start shooting for another until a cloud he liked rolled across the sky. It cost over $44 million, but brought in only $3.5 million at the box office. The original version ran at nearly four hours, but was pulled from release after only one week due to scathing reviews. It later resurfaced in a 149-minute version, but by then the damage was done. The film effectively ended not only the existence of United Artists as an independent Hollywood studio (its parent firm sold the company to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, where it operated until 2019), but also, largely, Cimino's career; initially considered a director on the rise after directing The Deer Hunter (which won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director), his reputation never recovered after Heaven's Gate. The production is also notorious for the cruelty to animals that occurred both on screen and on site, including deliberately killing a horse with explosives. The controversies surrounding Heaven's Gate's failure are credited for having a role in ending the "auteur period" of the 1970s, with studios subsequently taking control back from directors.
Vincent Canby called it "an unqualified disaster", among other things. Roger Ebert called it "the most scandalous cinematic waste I've ever seen". After word of his grandiose spending and defiant nature toward studio United Artists got out (detailed in Final Cut by Steven Bach, a studio executive involved with the film from the beginning), Cimino was awarded the 1980 Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, and the film was nominated for four more Razzies, including Worst Picture. In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century, and Rolling Stone ranked it as one of the worst decisions in movie history. In 2008, Joe Queenan of The Guardian called it the worst film ever made, saying that it "defies belief". Readers of film magazine Empire later voted Heaven's Gate the sixth-worst film of all time, and Vanity Fair included it in its list of the worst films ever made.
Despite the vicious reviews, the film's reputation improved over time. In fall of 2012, the New York Film Festival, the venue for its infamous opening, premiered the restored director's cut. In stark contrast, The Times called the restored version "a modern masterpiece" and its 1980 cut "one of the greatest injustices of cinematic history". The film has also been released on Blu-ray and DVD by the Criterion Collection. Manohla Dargis of The New York Times said that the film "has been called a disaster and a disgrace, yet also anointed a masterpiece." In 2023, the French magazine Télérama ranked it 17th in its list of the 100 greatest films in the history of cinema, describing the work as "a post-classical, lyrical, and disenchanted Western".
The Apple (1980)
Main article: The Apple (1980 film)The Apple (also called Star Rock) is a 1980 science fiction musical comedy film written and directed by Menahem Golan. It stars Catherine Mary Stewart as a young singer named Bibi, who, in a futuristic 1994, signs to an evil label named Boogalow International Music. It deals with themes of conformity versus rebellion, and makes use of Biblical allegory, including that of Adam and Eve and the rapture.
Common criticism from both reviews that appeared in trade publications and major news outlets and the audience were a lack of originality, a weak script, uninspired music, poor execution, and Golan's inexperienced take on the 1960s hippie movement. During the 1980 Montreal World Film Festival, some members of the audience threw vinyl records of music from the film at the screen. At the 1980 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the film received seven nominations (including Worst Picture) and won two awards: Worst Director (Golan) and Least "Special" Special Effects. Stinkers co-founder Mike Lancaster later selected The Apple as the worst film he had ever seen. The Saturday Evening Post listed it as the worst movie musical ever, and critic Tim Brayton described it as "A completely unadulterated bundle of the worst of cinema all spun up into one ball of madness. It cannot be described, and it can barely be experienced." Sean Burns in Philadelphia Weekly wrote: "The Apple isn't just the worst disco musical ever made; it could very well be the worst movie ever made, period." The Apple was included in Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column, where critic Kenneth Lowe described it as "without a doubt the most cringe-inducing, the most mortifying, the absolutely most embarrassing feature we've ever watched." It has also been covered by the How Did This Get Made? podcast and Flavorwire's Bad Movie Night column and Mental Floss listed it as one of the "Ten Really Bad Movies that Define 'Bad Movies'".
Inchon (1981)
Main article: Inchon (film)The war film Inchon, directed by Terence Young and starring Laurence Olivier as General Douglas MacArthur, was meant to depict the Battle of Inchon during the Korean War. Producer Mitsuharu Ishii was a senior member of the Japanese branch of the Unification Church, whose leader, Sun Myung Moon, claimed he had the film made to show MacArthur's spirituality and connection to God and the Japanese people. Its eventual production cost of $46 million resulted in a $5 million box-office gross, and The New York Times review written by Vincent Canby calls the movie "the most expensive B-movie ever". The Washington Post described Inchon as "one of the biggest commercial disasters in film history". Every conceivable kind of problem plagued production, including labor issues, the U.S. military withdrawing support due to the film's Unification Church connection, weather and natural disasters, customs difficulties, expensive directorial blunders, and the original director (Andrew McLaglen) quitting before the start of production. Olivier's performance was criticized, and he was awarded the 1982 Golden Raspberry award for Worst Actor. The film itself took the 1982 Razzies for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and Young's direction earned him a tie for Worst Director of 1982. A number of reviewers at various media outlets described Inchon as the worst film ever made, including The Washington Post, Newsweek, TV Guide, and the Canadian Press. Inchon was later profiled in multiple books on worst in film, including The Hollywood Hall of Shame by Harry and Michael Medved, and The Worst Movies of All Time by Michael Sauter. To date, Inchon has never been released on home video in the United States although it was aired on the church's Good Life TV Network.
Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)
Main article: Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981 film)The adventure film Tarzan, the Ape Man, loosely based on the novel Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs, stars Miles O'Keeffe (who would later star in the 1982 Conan the Barbarian knock-off Ator the Invincible, which alongside its sequel featured in two episodes of the TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000) in the title role and Bo Derek as his partner Jane Parker, and is told from Jane's point of view. Despite being a box-office success, critics poorly received it upon its release due to its poor screenplay, bad acting, and unintentional humor. Leonard Maltin, writing for his Movie Guide, stated that the film "lacks action, humor and charm", and considered it so bad that it "nearly forced editors of this book to devise a rating lower than BOMB". Leslie Halliwell was equally harsh; he described Tarzan, the Ape Man as "certainly the worst of the Tarzan movies and possibly the banalest film so far made; even the animals give poor performances". Writer Thomas S. Hischak described it thus: "Produced and directed without a shred of talent by John Derek, Tarzan, the Ape Man often ranks high in the lists of the worst movies ever made." Film critic John Nesbit considered it "my pick for worst film ever", while Matt Brunson of Creative Loafing wrote, "this cinematic atrocity truly is one of the all-time worsts". Tarzan, the Ape Man was nominated for six awards at the 2nd Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Actress (Bo Derek). It holds a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 20 reviews.
Mommie Dearest (1981)
Main article: Mommie Dearest (film)Mommie Dearest, directed by Frank Perry, was based on the memoir of the same name by Christina Crawford, about her upbringing by Joan Crawford. It was the first film to sweep the Golden Raspberry Awards nominations, winning a total of five Razzies out of the nine nominations, including "Worst Picture" and Worst Actress (Faye Dunaway, shared with Bo Derek). The same organization also named it "Worst Picture of the Decade" in 1989/90, and was nominated for "Worst Drama of Our First 25 Years" in 2004/05. The film is part of the "100 most awful" in The Official Razzie Movie Guide and Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time. It earned, as film critic and TV host Richard Crouse put it, "some of the nastiest reviews ever". Eric Henderson of CBS Minneapolis named it at the top of his "Best 'Worst Movies Ever'" list. Roger Ebert wrote of this film, "I can't imagine who would want to subject themselves to this movie. 'Mommie Dearest' is a painful experience that drones on endlessly, as Joan Crawford's relationship with her daughter, Christina, disintegrates from cruelty through jealousy into pathos." Of the performance of Faye Dunaway, Variety said "Dunaway does not chew scenery. Dunaway starts neatly at each corner of the set in every scene and swallows it whole, co-stars and all." Vanity Fair and Rotten Tomatoes subsequently included Mommie Dearest on their worst film lists.
Despite the reviews at the time, the film was a box-office success, grossing $39 million worldwide on a $5 million budget. It has a 50% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 46 reviews. The site's consensus reads, "Mommie Dearest certainly doesn't lack for conviction, and neither does Faye Dunaway's legendary performance as a wire-wielding monster; unfortunately, the movie is too campy and undisciplined to transcend guilty pleasure".
Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (The Man Who Saves the World) (1982)
Main article: Dünyayı Kurtaran AdamThe Turkish science-fiction adventure Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (also commonly known as Turkish Star Wars) was directed by Çetin İnanç and starred Cüneyt Arkın. It is notorious for illegally using footage from well-known science fiction films and shows, most notably Star Wars, along with stealing the music score from films such as Moonraker and Raiders of the Lost Ark. The film is also criticized for its nonsensical plot, badly written dialogue, and crude special effects. It is also a fantasy martial arts film, heavily influenced by 1970s Hong Kong martial arts films from Golden Harvest.
Jos Kirps of ArticlesBase called it "The Worst Movie Ever", and stated, "There are many bad sci-fi movies, and for many years movie addicts even considered Ed Wood's Plan 9 From Outer Space the worst movie of all times. But Plan 9 is still a pretty good movie when compared to Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam." Sabah called it the "world's worst film". Hürriyet described the film as "sitting on the throne of the king" when compared to other "so bad it's good" cult films. Toronto Standard called it a "dollar-store Star Wars" and compared it to the works of Ed Wood. When it became apparent that the film had inspired an enthusiastic international cult, a sequel, The Son of the Man Who Saved the World (Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam'ın Oğlu), was shot in 2006 and featured many returning members of the original cast and crew. The film was included on Time Out's 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.
Howard the Duck (1986)
Main article: Howard the Duck (film)Directed by Willard Huyck, written by Huyck and Gloria Katz, and produced by George Lucas, it is based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name. Howard the Duck received overwhelmingly negative reviews from film critics. Orange Coast Magazine writer Marc Weinberg and Leonard Maltin criticized the decision to shoot the film in live action. The appearance of Howard was criticized as being unconvincing due to his poorly functioning mouth and expressionless face. Reviewers also criticized the acting and humor and found the film boring. Dave Kehr of the Chicago Tribune said the movie's "crude, often embarrassing, sex jokes" seemed "out of place" with the more innocent aspects of the film. Jay Carr of The Boston Globe claimed that "They Don't Get Much Worse Than Howard", Glenn Heath Jr. of Slant Magazine wrote that it "has a rightful place in the canon of worst films ever", and TV Guide states it is "one of the worst big-budget movies ever made". It was featured in Empire's poll of the 50 worst films ever made, and Screen Rant and Vanity Fair have included it on their worst film lists.
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 13% based on 86 reviews, making it the lowest-rated Lucasfilm production of those reviewed on the site. The site's consensus states: "While it has its moments, Howard the Duck suffers from an uneven tone and mediocre performances." It received seven Golden Raspberry Award nominations in 1987 including Worst Supporting Actor (Tim Robbins), Worst Director (Willard Huyck) and Worst Original Song ("Howard the Duck"). It won four trophies for Worst Screenplay, Worst New Star ("the six guys and gals in the duck suit"), Worst Visual Effects, and Worst Picture, tied with Under the Cherry Moon. The movie also won a Stinkers Bad Movie Awards for Worst Picture. The negative reaction to the film took its toll on the cast, who found themselves unable to work on other projects as a result.
Over time, the film has remained a source of fascination and developed "a small, but loyal fanbase." Howard the Duck has appeared in several Marvel Cinematic Universe movies and series beginning in 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy, in which he was voiced by Seth Green.
Ishtar (1987)
Main article: Ishtar (film)Ishtar was written and directed by Elaine May and starred Oscar-winning duo Warren Beatty and Dustin Hoffman as an ode to the Road to... film series featuring Bing Crosby and Bob Hope. Beatty and Hoffman star as Rogers and Clarke, two untalented lounge singers who travel to Morocco in hopes of finding a gig. Due to unanticipated problems with filming in the desert—which resulted in numerous reshoots—the film ran over budget by $30 million. While its final budget cost was $55 million, Ishtar earned only $14,375,181 at the North American box office, leading Ishtar to become synonymous with "box-office flop". It was also subject to harsh reviews from critics. The film was nominated for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay in the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Director. The San Jose Mercury News claimed that "Time has not improved this film's reputation as being one of the worst ever made." Time Out suggested it was "so bad it could have been deliberate", and called it "one of the worst films ever made", while Ed Morrissey referred to it as "The Citizen Kane of big-budget, A-list vehicular homicides." It was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time book, Rotten Tomatoes placed it amongst "25 Moves So Bad They're Unmissable" and Richard Roeper included it on his list of the 40 worst films he had seen. In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century.
The film has since become a cult classic. Ishtar has seen a minor critical re-evaluation from some critics like Richard Brody, and directors Quentin Tarantino, Edgar Wright, and Martin Scorsese have praised it in interviews. Gary Larson, who initially lampooned the movie in The Far Side, said he regrets writing that cartoon because he based it solely on Ishtar's reputation, and that he enjoyed the film when he later watched it. As of December 2022, it is the only cartoon he has publicly admitted to regretting. Defenders argue that the studio did not back May, resulting in a public relations disaster before it was released in theaters. Joe Queenan compared the film to another comedy film considered the worst, Gigli, and wrote that although it was considered one of the worst films ever made at the time of its release, it "has several comic moments" and does not get worse on subsequent viewings, unlike Gigli.
Leonard Part 6 (1987)
Main article: Leonard Part 6Leonard Part 6, starring (as well as written and produced by) Bill Cosby, was intended as a parody of spy movies. Leonard Parker, a former CIA spy, is brought out of retirement to save the world from an evil vegetarian who brainwashes animals to kill people. Rita Kempley at The Washington Post noted the large number of Coca-Cola product placements and said "The only good thing about Bill Cosby's Leonard Part 6 is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5." Scott Weinberg at DVD Talk noted the film as "truly one of the worst movies you'll ever see ... movies this bad should be handled with Teflon gloves and a pair of tongs". By 1990, Dennis King of the Tulsa World wrote that the film had "become synonymous with 'bomb.'" Total Film and Vanity Fair subsequently included Leonard Part 6 on their respective worst film lists. Cosby himself disowned the film, and when it was released to theaters he publicly advised people not to see it. It earned Golden Raspberrys for Worst Actor (Cosby), Worst Picture, and Worst Screenplay. It was also nominated for two more Razzie Awards, for Worst Supporting Actress and Worst Director. Cosby became the first person to accept a Golden Raspberry Award, and said "It was the worst movie I ever made – the worst movie anyone ever made".
Nukie (1987)
Main article: NukieNukie is a 1987 South African film directed by Sias Odendaal (credited as Sias Odendal) and Michael Pakleppa, and starring Steve Railsback, Ronald France, and Glynis Johns. The plot concerns an alien, Nukie, who crash lands on Earth and seeks help from two children to reunite with his brother, Miko, who has been captured by the United States government. The film is considered to be a knock-off of Steven Spielberg's 1982 film E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Witney Seibold of /Film writes that "Nukie is only remarkable for how undeniably terrible it is", noting that it appears on lists of the worst films ever made. Comic Book Resources note that it is "regarded as one of the worst movies ever made", with critic Brad Jones selecting Nukie as the worst film he has ever seen, and Red Letter Media calling it "Possibly one of the worst films ever made." Total Film write that it is considered by some to be the "most painful movie ever made"; they listed Nukie the worst kids movie ever made and one of the worst science-fiction films ever made. The film's co-director, Michael Pakleppa, referred to Nukie as "the most wrong-gone thing ever done in life" and feared that the final product was "the worst film on Earth."
The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987)
Main article: The Garbage Pail Kids MovieThe Garbage Pail Kids Movie is a 1987 live-action adaptation of the then-popular trading card series of the same name, itself a gross-out parody of the then-popular Cabbage Patch Kids dolls co-created by Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Art Spiegelman. The film is often criticized for its gross-out humor, nonsensical plot, poor explanations, bad acting, and the unsettling appearance of the Garbage Pail Kids (the title characters are depicted by dwarf actors in low-budget costumes, with poorly functioning mouths and expressionless faces). It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. On Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1, making it tied for the lowest scoring film on the site. Caryn James of The New York Times said the movie is "too repulsive for children or adults of any age" and is "enough to make you believe in strict and faraway boarding schools". Carlos Coto of the Sun-Sentinel called it "one of the worst ever made". Internet critic Doug Walker, best known for the series Nostalgia Critic, stated that it was not only the worst film he had ever reviewed as the Nostalgia Critic, but the worst movie he had ever seen overall, deeming that the film served to undermine its own moral.
Much of the film's content is said to be inappropriate for children, its intended audience. Throughout the movie, the Garbage Pail Kids steal, get in fights, bite people's toes off, flatulate in people's faces, threaten others with switchblades, urinate upon themselves, and run over cars. In addition to scatological behavior, the movie has several scenes that feature sexual images, violence, and drinking. Offended parents launched a nationwide protest of the movie that successfully resulted in the movie being withdrawn from circulation. The shortened release contributed to the movie's poor gross of only $1,576,615. It was nominated for three Razzies at the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Visual Effects, Worst New Star for the Garbage Pail Kids collectively, and Worst Original Song.
Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 (1987)
Main article: Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 is the sequel to the 1984 Christmas-themed slasher film Silent Night, Deadly Night, which faced protests from parent groups and sharp criticism from At the Movies hosts Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel due to its promotional campaign featuring an ax-wielding Santa Claus. The film was a financial success despite the controversy, leading producers to enlist Lee Harry to repurpose its footage for a new project; however, $100,000 was eventually allocated to shoot additional original material. Nearly half of the Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2's runtime consists of flashbacks to the first film, narrated by Ricky Caldwell (Eric Freeman), the brother of the original film's protagonist, as he recounts events before embarking on his own murderous rampage.
Much of the film's reception and legacy centers on Freeman's performance, which Flavorwire states "may very well be the single worst performance ever committed to celluloid," and Nathan Rabin states: "I'm not sure whether Freeman gives the worst performance of all time or the best here but it is one of the most unique starring turns in the history of film." A scene in which Ricky shouts "garbage day!" before shooting and killing a bystander taking out his trash became an Internet meme after being uploaded to YouTube in its early years. Screen Rant has since deemed the film to be "a masterpiece of the so bad it's good variety," and "one of the worst movies ever made." Meanwhile, Rabin stated it was "the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That’s why it’s great and every one should see it." Emmett O'Regan of Comic Book Resources also selected it as the worst movie ever made, and an article in Paste asserted that: "in terms of filmmaking quality—it’s hard to believe that in terms of pure, unadulterated crap, anything could ever surpass it." Additionally, Flavorwire, /Film, and Paste have all listed it as the worst Christmas film ever made. Time Out and Flavorwire later included it on their respective lists of the worst films ever made.
Hobgoblins (1988)
Main article: Hobgoblins (film)Hobgoblins, by Rick Sloane, is widely considered a low-budget knock-off that capitalizes on the popularity of the 1984 film Gremlins. It gained popularity in 1998 after being featured on an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000. MST3K writer Paul Chaplin later commented on Hobgoblins, saying, "Oh, man. You have no idea the torture it was to watch this movie several times in the space of a week. It shoots right to the top of the list of the worst movies we've ever done." Specific points of the film that were lampooned were the extreme misogyny and atrocious treatment of women; the film's technical incompetence and repetitive scenes; its asinine, poorly conceived plot; its dreadful acting; and its ugly look and gratuitous vulgarity, particularly in regards to its characters and subject matter. David Cornelius of DVD Talk stated, "There's not one aspect of this movie that isn't the Worst Thing Ever." The Standard's Bad Horror Club noted its status as one of the worst films of all time, commenting: "it’s so preposterously badly made, terribly acted and ineptly constructed that it makes for some of the most fun you can ever have watching a movie."
Sloane has embraced Hobgoblins' status as one of the worst films of all time, stating that he fears that it will be forgotten if it is removed from IMDb's user-generated bottom 100 list. After seeing the MST3K episode himself, Sloane was inspired to direct a sequel, which was released in 2009. In addition to IMDb, it has been featured on lists from Flavorwire and Total Film.
Mac and Me (1988)
Main article: Mac and MeMac and Me is about a young boy in a wheelchair who meets and befriends an alien who has crash-landed on Earth. A box-office failure, the film grossed $6,424,112 in the United States on a $13 million budget. It used to have a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, whose critical consensus notes that it is "duly infamous" as both an imitation of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), and a marketing vehicle for McDonald's and Coca-Cola (the filmmakers had admitted a profit-sharing arrangement with the former). Leonard Maltin described the film as being "more like a TV commercial than a movie", and Marjorie Baumgarten of the Austin Chronicle called it a "shameless E.T. knockoff". Mac and Me is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made, with The Telegraph reporting that it is "frequently pulled out in 'worst film of all time' arguments". Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock (responsible for the 2004 Oscar-nominated Super Size Me) declared it the "worst thing you'll ever see in your entire life", as well as the most egregious example of product placement in cinema history. The film was also named the worst ever in the San Francisco Chronicle, as well as by broadcaster Simon Mayo and writer/producer Damon Lindelof. Michael Hayden of GQ India referred to it as "hands down the worst family movie in Hollywood history". The film was nominated for four Razzie Awards including Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and won two trophies: Worst Director for Stewart Raffill (tied with Blake Edwards for Sunset) and Worst New Star for Ronald McDonald in a cameo. Mac and Me has however gained a cult following and was featured on the second season of the Mystery Science Theater 3000 revival (the only Razzie-winning film ever to be riffed in the history of the show).
Things (1989)
Main article: Things (film)Things, a 1989 Canadian low budget, independent, horror exploitation film, was written and produced by Andrew Jordan & Barry J. Gillis. It cost approximately $35,000 in total to make and marked the mainstream film debut of porn star Amber Lynn. It was ostensibly made as homage to horror icons and films, such as George A. Romero and his Night of the Living Dead franchise. Adam Symchuk of Screen Rant writes: "While films like The Room and Birdemic seem to be constant contenders for the best 'so bad it's good' movie, is the true unheralded champion among many cinephiles." Likewise, Jeff Kirschner of Dread Central nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Will Pfeifer opined that "It's so terrible I can't think of another movie that even comes close." In 2022, RiffTrax concluded that Things was the worst movie that they had ever spoofed.
1990s
Troll 2 (1990)
Main article: Troll 2Despite its title, Troll 2 does not feature any trolls (the antagonists are actually goblins) and has no relation to the original 1986 film. Troll 2 was produced under the title "Goblins", but the title was changed by American distributors. In the film, an American family vacations to the town of Nilbog (goblin spelled backwards), where vegetarian goblins attempt to turn the family into edible plants. It was shot in Utah and the cast was composed of local amateur actors. A language barrier developed between the cast and the Italian crew, led by director Claudio Fragasso, who had translated the script to English. The bad acting and dialogue have become notorious for their camp value, with individual scenes having become Internet memes. In 2009, Michael Stephenson, the child star of Troll 2, released Best Worst Movie, a documentary exploring the film's tumultuous production and its unexpected cult following.
NPR reports that it is "known as the worst movie of all time" while The A.V. Club calls it "a popular candidate for the worst film ever made". Likewise, TV Guide proclaimed that "Troll 2 is really as bad as they come," and Ken Hanke of Mountain Xpress stated in his review that: "There are movies that are bad. There are movies that are so-bad-they're-good. And then there's Troll 2—a movie that's so bad that it defies comprehension." Troll 2 regularly appears on lists of films considered the worst, including: Flavorwire, Fotogramas, IGN, Rotten Tomatoes, Screen Rant, and Time Out. Furthermore, Collider named it the most rewatchable bad movie of all time.
Highlander II: The Quickening (theatrical version, 1991)
Main article: Highlander II: The QuickeningThe French-British film Highlander II: The Quickening is a sequel to the 1986 cult film Highlander, which transitions the fantasy of the original film into science fiction, and retcons the mystical warriors of the first film into aliens. It received a harsh reception from both critics and audiences, as it has a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes and appears on its 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Common criticisms included the lack of motivation for the characters, blatant disregard for backstory from the first film (such as the new and seemingly incongruent origin for the Immortals and the unexplained resurrection of Ramírez), glaring plot holes, a messy and nonsensical story structure, the filmmaker's inability to balance unrelated plots and subplots, and obvious contradictions in the film's internal logic. In selecting it as the worst movie sequel of all time, Comic Book Resources also wrote that "it is typically considered one of the worst films of all time." Roger Ebert named it the worst film of 1991, stating: "If there is a planet somewhere whose civilization is based on the worst movies of all time, Highlander 2: The Quickening deserves a sacred place among their most treasured artifacts." An IGN review said: "How bad is this movie? Well, imagine if Ed Wood were alive today, and someone gave him a multi-million dollar budget. See his imagination running rampant, bringing in aliens from outer space with immensely powerful firearms, immortals who bring each other back to life by calling out their names, epic duels on flying skateboards, and a blatant disregard for anything logical or previously established—now you are starting to get closer to the vision of Highlander II." Screen Rant has since included it on its list of the 25 worst films of all time.
In 1995, the film's director Russell Mulcahy made a director's cut version known as Highlander 2: Renegade Version and then later released another version simply known as Highlander 2: The Special Edition for its 2004 DVD release. The film was reconstructed on both occasions largely from existing material, with certain scenes removed and others added back in, and the entire sequence of events changed. The reconstructed film's reception was far better than the original's; it was elevated to a mixed reception.
Super Mario Bros. (1993)
Main article: Super Mario Bros. (film)The first feature-length live-action film based on a video game, Super Mario Bros. was directed by the husband-and-wife team of Rocky Morton and Annabel Jankel (known for their work on Max Headroom). It follows the brothers Mario (Bob Hoskins) and Luigi (John Leguizamo), plumbers who venture into a parallel universe to rescue Princess Daisy (Samantha Mathis) from the villainous King Koopa (Dennis Hopper). The Super Mario series' publisher, Nintendo, believed the Mario franchise was strong enough for experimentation and gave the filmmakers free creative license. The finished film bears little resemblance to the games, trading their colorful Mushroom Kingdom for a dystopic world populated by humanoid dinosaurs. SyFy Wire wrote: "Some movies are so bad that they're secretly good. Super Mario Bros. is so bad it crushes your spirit. It's unfathomably terrible." The film was criticized for its inconsistent tone, complex narrative, and lack of faithfulness to the source material. According to Variety, Super Mario Bros. is a mainstay on lists compiling the worst films of all time. It was voted the sixth worst film of all time by RiffTrax in 2012, and IGN ranked it among the "best worst movies ever made" in 2021. Author David Bodanis, in his 2020 book The Art of Fairness, called Super Mario Bros. "the worst movie ever made".
In addition to scathing reviews, Super Mario Bros. was a box-office bomb, and Morton and Jankel were "blacklisted" as directors in Hollywood. In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said: "The worst thing I ever did? Super Mario Bros. It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots." In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was Super Mario Bros. The film made Nintendo wary of licensing its works to film studios, and it did not license Mario again until it collaborated with Illumination for The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023). Seth Rogen, who voiced Donkey Kong in the 2023 film, called Super Mario Bros. one of the worst films ever made and what "made me realize that movies, like, could be bad. That never occurred to me until that moment."
North (1994)
Main article: North (1994 film)The Rob Reiner film North is an adaptation of the novel North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents by Alan Zweibel, who also wrote the screenplay and has a minor role in the film. North, which stars Elijah Wood in the title role and also marked Scarlett Johansson's film debut, was a critical and commercial failure, earning only $7,138,449 worldwide despite its budget of over $40 million. It was widely criticized for its plot, its all-star cast of insensitive characters, lack of humor and portrayal of numerous ethnic stereotypes (especially Alaskan Inuit). It has a 14% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes. Roger Ebert gave it zero stars and, in his review, infamously wrote, "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it." He continued saying "North is a bad film – one of the worst movies ever made", and it is also on his list of most hated films. Both Ebert and Gene Siskel named North as the worst film of 1994. Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said in his review that "North is director Rob Reiner's first flat-out failure, a sincerely wrought, energetically made picture that all the same crashes on takeoff. It's strange and oddly distasteful, at its best managing to be bad in some original and unexpected ways." Richard Roeper named North as one of the 40 worst movies he has ever seen, saying that, "Of all the films on this list, North may be the most difficult to watch from start to finish." The film was nominated for the following awards at the 15th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Actor (Bruce Willis, also for Color of Night), Worst Supporting Actress (Kathy Bates), Worst Supporting Actor (Dan Aykroyd, also for Exit to Eden), Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay (Andrew Scheinman and Alan Zweibel).
Dis – en historie om kjærlighet (A Story About Love) (1995)
Main article: A Story About LoveThe Norwegian romantic film Dis – en historie om kjærlighet was directed by Aune Sand. The film follows different couples and their love stories around the world, in Cairo, Normandy, Oslo and New York City. Dis received universally poor reviews by critics, and has been called the most poorly reviewed Norwegian film in history. Critic Harald Kolstad of Dagsavisen gave it a score of zero, refused to acknowledge Dis as a film, and claimed to have never seen anything worse. Aftenposten referred to the film as "the largest turkey" and "the most reviled film", and Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made. Despite being a critical disaster it became a commercial success, gaining cult film status with a following akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show, with fans embracing its "so bad it's good" qualities. Director Aune Sand insists that Dis is a masterpiece.
Showgirls (1995)
Main article: ShowgirlsHype for Paul Verhoeven's erotic drama Showgirls focused on the sex and nudity in this NC-17 French-American film with a $45 million budget, but the final result was critically derided. Much hype revolved around the film's star, Elizabeth Berkley, who only two years before had starred in the lighthearted and chaste teen sitcom Saved by the Bell. The film won seven Razzie Awards, a record at that time, and received 13 nominations, a record that still stands. It received an additional award at the 20th Golden Raspberry Awards, where it was awarded Worst Picture of the Decade. Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times called it, "a film of thunderous oafishness that gives adult subject matter the kind of bad name it does not need or deserve". Michael Dequina of TheMovieReport.com also criticized the film, claiming that it was "the best bad filmmaking Hollywood has to offer". Adam White wrote in The Independent that it was "the worst movie ever made" but also a masterpiece. Stephen Lynch of the Knight Ridder/Tribune similarly named it the worst movie ever made, calling it "so bad it may be brilliant". Various sources have since included Showgirls in their respective lists of the worst films ever made, including: Rotten Tomatoes, Empire, Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, and Flavorwire. Showgirls was also featured in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time as well as The Official Razzie Movie Guide. Despite being a critical failure and failing at the box office initially, Showgirls found success as a camp cult film, particularly among the LGBT community, but whether the film was intended to be satirical remains subject to debate. On the home video market, the film was MGM's most profitable release for years.
The Scarlet Letter (1995)
Main article: The Scarlet Letter (1995 film)A "freely adapted" version of the 1850 romantic novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, directed by Roland Joffé and starring Demi Moore and Gary Oldman. The film met with universally negative reviews and was a box-office bomb, grossing $10.4 million against a production budget of $46 million. Multiple critics named the film the worst of 1995.
Chris Hicks of the Deseret News argued that its deviation from the source material represents "Hollywood's arrogance in its purest form". The Washington Post's Amy E. Schwartz reported that the "nutty" film was described by numerous reviewers as the worst they had ever seen. Kevin Williamson of National Review observed a "combination of awfulness and inexplicability", and claimed that "any objective and authoritative analysis will reveal that the worst film ever made is Demi Moore's version of The Scarlet Letter". Sadie Trombetta of Bustle wrote that it "has earned an almost permanent spot on every 'Worst Movie of All Time' list", while author Libby Fischer Hellmann noted that it is "widely cited as the worst film adaptation ever made". The film was nominated for seven Golden Raspberry Awards, winning "Worst Remake or Sequel". Furthermore, Roger Ebert placed the film on his "most hated" list.
Bio-Dome (1996)
Main article: Bio-DomeThe 1996 comedy film Bio-Dome focuses on two moronic stoner best friends, played by Pauly Shore and Stephen Baldwin, who accidentally get trapped inside of the Bio-Dome owned by Henry Gibson, a hermetically sealed ecological system, after mistaking it for a mall while looking for a bathroom.
For MTV News, Eric Snider wrote in 2008 that "nothing can account for...the movie Bio-Dome, which is–and I do not make this assertion lightly–the worst crime ever perpetrated against humanity throughout all of recorded history". Snider went on to call it "quite bad" and "certainly one of the worst comedies" he had ever seen, criticizing Pauly Shore's performance as unfunny and the film's writing as stupid. Syfy Wire's Cassidy Ward described Bio-Dome as "one of the best-worst movies of all time", stating that its plot "strains credulity", while Jon O'Brien of Inverse called it "one of the worst movies ever made" and wrote that it "has nothing to offer but unconvincing pratfalls...tumbleweed one-liners...and some unashamed sexism, too". It was described as "almost unwatchably awful" and "a baffling piece of work" by Charles Bramesco of Uproxx, who wrote that it was a "perennial contender in the battle for the title of Worst Movie Ever". The A.V. Club's Nathan Rabin wrote, "Critics and audiences alike found the Bio-Dome to be an abomination unto the Lord, an affront to the gods of cinema, and also a very bad movie, bad enough to be considered the gold standard of crapitude in Shore's oeuvre," noting that it had the lowest Metacritic score of any movie, with 1 out of 100. Bio-Dome was named one of the worst movies of the 1990s in a poll conducted by RiffTrax.
Kylie Minogue, who starred in the film as oceanographer Petra von Kant, called appearing in the film the worst decision of her career. For his performance in the movie, Shore won the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor at the 17th Golden Raspberry Awards, tying with Tom Arnold for his performance in Big Bully.
Batman & Robin (1997)
Main article: Batman & Robin (film)Batman & Robin is a superhero film based on the DC character Batman and is the fourth and final installment of the Burton/Schumacher Batman film series. It is directed by Joel Schumacher and stars George Clooney as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Freeze, Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy, Chris O'Donnell as Robin/Dick Grayson, Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl/Barbara Wilson and Michael Gough as Alfred Pennyworth. This film was largely criticized for its toyetic and camp approach, and Mr. Freeze's approach and one-line jokes.
As of June 2017, review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that 11% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 89 reviews, certifying it "Rotten" with an average rating of 3.7/10, and the critics' consensus: "Joel Schumacher's tongue-in-cheek attitude hits an unbearable limit in Batman & Robin, resulting in a frantic and mindless movie that's too jokey to care much for." By comparison Metacritic collected an average score of 28/100, based on 21 reviews. Michael J. Nelson, of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame, wrote of the movie in his book, Movie Megacheese, "Batman & Robin is not the worst movie ever. No, indeed. It's the worst thing ever. Yes, it's the single worst thing that we as human beings have ever produced in recorded history." Batman & Robin also came in first in an Empire poll of the 50 worst films ever. Joel Schumacher apologized to disappointed fans on the 2005 DVD release of Batman & Robin. In 2021, Clooney stated that he refused to let his wife watch the film, saying, "There are certain films I just go, 'I want my wife to have some respect for me'". Clooney however would reprise his role as Bruce Wayne from the film in 2023's The Flash.
Le Jour et la Nuit (The Day and the Night) (1997)
Main article: Day and Night (1997 film)The French romance film Le Jour et la Nuit was directed by philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy. It follows a French author who fled to Mexico for a quiet life and an actress who is willing to seduce him to get a part in a film adapted from one of his books. Before its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was heavily promoted in many French newspapers and magazines. When the film premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival in 1997, hundreds of journalists walked out of the screening and those that stayed ridiculed it. Following its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was harshly criticized by the French media, with overwhelmingly negative reviews appearing in publications such as Libération, Le Monde and Le Nouvel Observateur. The film also did poorly commercially, with only 73,147 seats for Le Jour et la Nuit having been sold two months after its release. L'Humanité called it an "Absolute debacle" and Michel Houellebecq referred to it as the "most preposterous film in history". Le Jour et la Nuit was considered the worst French film since 1945 by film magazine Cahiers du cinéma, and its status as the "worst film in history" was discussed by the French version of Slate. Likewise, English-language film site /Film described its status as "one of the worst foreign language movies ever made", and filmmaker Claude Chabrol selected it as one of the worst movies ever made. An original documentary, Anatomy of a Massacre, was released with the Le Jour et la Nuit DVD, and focused on its intense negative reception and failure.
The Avengers (1998)
Main article: The Avengers (1998 film)An adaptation of the popular 1960s British TV series of the same name, The Avengers starred Ralph Fiennes as John Steed and Uma Thurman as Emma Peel, with Sean Connery as their antagonist, Sir August de Wynter. It was directed by Jeremiah S. Chechik. The Avengers began to receive negative publicity after Warner Bros., the film's distributor, refused to allow any early press-screenings for movie reviewers. After early test screenings, The Avengers was heavily edited by the studio. On its release, The Avengers was savaged by film critics, with the Birmingham Post stating "The Avengers is being slated by critics as the worst film ever made" and adding that one reviewer had joked the film was such a "turkey" that the makers should have handed distribution to the poultry chain Bernard Matthews. Several reviewers disparaged The Avengers for lacking the wit and excitement of its source material. Janet Maslin strongly criticized The Avengers: "With pseudo-suave repartee that would make Austin Powers blush and with so many shades of Howard the Duck that one scene depicts man-size pastel teddy bears sitting around a conference table, it's a film to gall fans of the old TV series and perplex anyone else. I can't remember another Friday morning show where I heard actual cries of "Ugh!" on the way out the door" and finished her review with, "At a pared-down, barely rational 100 minutes, The Avengers is short but not short enough."
David Bianculli said, "This Avengers film is so horrendously, painfully and thoroughly awful, it gives other cinematic clunkers like Ishtar and Howard the Duck a good name." Alan Jones in The Radio Times stated "The cult 1960s TV series gets royally shafted by Hollywood in this stunningly designed blockbuster that's stunningly awful in every other department ... Terrible special effects and zero chemistry between Fiennes and Thurman make this notorious disaster a total waste of everyone's time and energy." The Avengers also shared a Razzie Award for "Worst Remake or Sequel" with the 1998 adaptations of Psycho and Godzilla at the 19th Golden Raspberry Awards. Total Film magazine later voted Fiennes and Thurman in The Avengers as "The Worst Movie Double Act Of All Time". The film also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.
Fatal Deviation (1998)
Main article: Fatal DeviationFatal Deviation is often credited as being the first martial arts film to be filmed in Ireland. It stars martial artist James Bennett and Michael Graham, who is best known for being a member of the boy band Boyzone. The Irish Post and Den of Geek write that it is a mainstay of worst film lists. Luke McKinney of Cracked.com called it the worst film ever made, writing: "There are so many things about making a movie that Jimmy doesn't know, that you could replace film school with this movie alone--just screening it once for students and asking them to list all the things it did wrong. Anyone who doesn't write 'everything' instantly fails." The Irish Post named it the worst Irish film of all time, the Irish Independent wrote that it is "regarded as one of the worst films ever made" and Comic Book Resources called it "one of the worst commercial movies ever made". Entertainment.ie placed it on its list of "10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die" and it was covered in Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column.
Parting Shots (1999)
Main article: Parting ShotsThe British black comedy Parting Shots was the last film directed by Michael Winner. It starred rock musician Chris Rea as a man who, after being told he has only six months to live, begins murdering people who have wronged him. Andrew Collins took a very negative view of the film: "Parting Shots ... is going to set the course of British film-making back 20 years. It is not only the worst British film produced in this country since Carry On Emmannuelle (quite a feat in itself), it is a thoroughbred contender for the crown of Worst Film Ever Made." In an interview about the film, Charlotte O'Sullivan, the Independent's film editor, claimed Parting Shots was "the worst film I've ever seen". O'Sullivan also criticized it for glorifying vigilantism: "It's Michael Winner and you know, he doesn't have any sense of irony. He seems to be saying it is okay to go and kill people." The journalist Miles Kington later claimed "Parting Shots ... was directed by Michael Winner and despite the glittering cast, was possibly the worst film ever made." I. Q. Hunter listed Parting Shots as one of the candidates for "the Worst British film ever made". Parting Shots was also featured in a poll of Empire magazine readers' "50 Worst Movies Ever" poll.
The Underground Comedy Movie (1999)
Main article: The Underground Comedy MovieThe Underground Comedy Movie is based on a cable access show from 1988. Director and lead actor Vince Offer constructed the film out of a series of tasteless, lowbrow skits (including Gena Lee Nolin loudly using the restroom and a superhero named Dickman who dresses in a giant penis costume and defeats his enemies by squirting them with semen). In 1999, Offer filed a suit against 20th Century Fox and the co-directors of There's Something About Mary (1998), Bobby and Peter Farrelly, claiming that 14 scenes in Mary were stolen from his film. The Farrellys released this statement: "We've never heard of him, we've never heard of his movie, and it's all a bunch of baloney." Lawrence Van Gelder of The New York Times referred to it as a "wretched film" and stated that "The Underground Comedy Movie stands as a monument to ineptitude and self-delusion." Rod Dreher of the New York Post said it "may be the least amusing comedy ever made". Dave Shulman of L.A. Weekly described it as a "serious contender for the single worst movie ever made", while Stinkers Bad Movie Awards co-founder Mike Lancaster said that it was the worst film that he had ever paid to see. Nathan Rabin covered the film in his column detailing terrible films and stated that: "nothing I've covered for this column was quite as soul-crushingly, brain-meltingly terrible as ... The Underground Comedy Movie." Thom Bennett at Film Journal International, wrote "Anyone offended by unbearably bad films, jokes that are not funny and wasting 90 minutes of their lives is, as promised, guaranteed to be offended. In fact, to even call this mess a comedy is giving it far too much credit", and "The Underground Comedy Movie may well be the worst film I have ever seen." Writing in Central Western Daily, Peter Young said, "I am pretty sure that I can declare this The Worst Film I Have Ever Seen."
2000s
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Main article: Battlefield Earth (film)Battlefield Earth is based on the first half of L. Ron Hubbard's 1982 novel of the same name, and stars John Travolta, Barry Pepper and Forest Whitaker. Although a sequel covering the second half of the book was planned, the panning from critics, poor box-office performance, and financial ruin of Franchise Pictures killed off such plans. It was criticized for a poor script, hammy acting, overuse of Dutch angles, repetitive dialogue, and several inconsistencies and plot holes. The movie's producer, Franchise Pictures, was later forced out of business after it emerged that it had fraudulently overstated the film's budget by $31 million. It has a 3% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, where it is included in the top 100 worst-reviewed movies of all time. Roger Ebert predicted that the film, "for decades to come will be the punch line of jokes about bad movies". Ebert also wrote, "The director, Roger Christian, has learned from better films that directors sometimes tilt their cameras, but he has not learned why". It is also on his "most hated" list. Nathan Rabin covered the film as part of his My World of Flops column for The A.V. Club, calling it "a fiasco that occupies a distinguished place high atop the pantheon of widely reviled crap" and said, "A legendary disaster well before it finished completion, Battlefield Earth hit theaters with a "Kick Me" sign on it so massive it could be detected from outer space."
It won seven Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture and Worst Screen Couple (John Travolta and "anyone on the screen with him"). In 2005, an eighth Razzie (for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years) was awarded to the film, and in 2010 it won a ninth Razzie at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade. Listing the film as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone quipped that, "If Earth sticks around long enough for the Golden Raspberry Awards to hand out a "worst movie of the century" at their 2100 ceremony, it'll probably win that, too." It won more Razzies than any film in the history of the awards at the time, until Jack and Jill surpassed its record with 10 wins in 2012.
The movie appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and is on the Movie Review Query Engine's (MRQE) 50 Worst Movies list, as well as worst film lists from Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, Flavorwire, Digital Trends and the New York Daily News. Empire named it the second worst movie ever made after Batman & Robin and The Register listed it as the worst movie ever made. Pepper and Whitaker both expressed regret for their involvement in Battlefield Earth, while film screenwriter J. David Shapiro later apologized for making "the suckiest movie ever".
Titanic: The Legend Goes On (2000)
Main article: Titanic: The Legend Goes OnTitanic: The Legend Goes On (also known as Titanic, mille e una storia, Titanic: La leggenda continua and Titanic: The Animated Movie) is an Italian animated mockbuster about the sinking of the RMS Titanic. It features a similar romantic storyline to James Cameron's 1997 Titanic film, but also has a number of talking animals (most notably, a rapping dog). Reviews condemned the quality of the animation and criticized the plot for being insensitive to the memory of the victims of the Titanic.
Total Film named Titanic: The Legend Goes On as "officially the worst film ever made", after it topped a list of the 66 worst films ever. An article from Collider also described it as one of the worst films ever made, but notes that it " the cult following that other bad films often acquire," stating: "Titanic: The Legend Goes On is too heinous for such fond pleasures." Critic Tim Brayton said that "It is one of the most surreally bad films I have ever encountered", adding: "For sheer mesmerising grotesqueness, there's almost nothing I can name that beats it, and no fan of bad movies can say that their life is complete till they've been exposed to it." Total Film also included the film on a list of the worst kids' movies, describing it as being "widely considered one of the worst animated films ever made", while Spanish film magazine Fotogramas selected it as one of the 20 worst films ever made. Screen Rant included it on a list of the 12 worst animated films of all time, and it topped a Showbiz Cheat Sheet list of the top 10 worst animated films ever, with author Will Roberts commenting that " list of the worst animated films of all time begins with ... Titanic: The Legend Goes On". In 2012, Titanic: The Legend Goes On became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's Bottom 100 list.
Freddy Got Fingered (2001)
Main article: Freddy Got FingeredThe comedy film Freddy Got Fingered stars Tom Green, who also wrote and directed it, featuring largely gross-out and shock humor similar to that featured in The Tom Green Show. In the film, Green stars as a 28-year-old slacker and cartoonist who falsely accuses his father of child molestation when he questions his son's life goals. Freddy Got Fingered received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with CNN critic Paul Clinton declaring it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history." Warren Epstein of The Gazette described Freddy Got Fingered as "the worst movie ever made". A review in The Washington Post said: "If ever a movie testified to the utter creative bankruptcy of the Hollywood film industry, it is the abomination known as Freddy Got Fingered." Roger Ebert included the film on his "most hated" list, gave it zero out of four stars and wrote: "This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."
Freddy Got Fingered was nominated for eight awards at the 2001 Razzies, and won for Worst Picture, Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, and Worst On-Screen Couple. Razzies founder John J. B. Wilson called it "offensive, stupid and obnoxious" and said it had "no redeeming value". Green accepted his awards in person, traveling to the ceremony in a white Cadillac, wearing a tuxedo and rolling out his own red carpet to the presentation. The movie has an 11% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. In 2010, the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade, though it lost to Battlefield Earth. Freddy Got Fingered also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, was featured in Empire's list of the 50 Worst Movies Ever poll, and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.
Glitter (2001)
Main article: Glitter (film)Starring Mariah Carey in the lead role as an aspiring singer in 1980s New York City, the romantic musical drama Glitter was intended to be her breakthrough role but was a critical failure and a box-office bomb. Hindustan Times claimed that Glitter "was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever". Fade In stated that "Glitter isn't just one of the worst music-themed films ever — it's one of the worst films ever made, period." Author Bob McCann wrote in Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television that it's "rightfully in the running as one of the worst films ever made". News.com.au, Hi, Flavorwire, Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, Metacritic, and Empire are amongst those who have listed it as one of the worst films ever made.
Glitter received six Razzie nominations, and Carey won for Worst Actress. It was also featured in The Official Razzie Movie Guide, and in 2005, it was nominated for "Worst Musical of Our First 25 Years", but lost to From Justin to Kelly. In an interview in 2010, Carey stated that she believed that the film's failure at the box office was largely due to the soundtrack being released the same day as the September 11 attacks. It has a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 87 reviews.
Swept Away (2002)
Main article: Swept Away (2002 film)A remake of a 1974 Italian film of the same name, the romantic comedy film Swept Away was directed by Guy Ritchie and starred his then-wife Madonna and Adriano Giannini. It received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with most of the criticism going towards Madonna's bad acting, the original film being considered superior and the remake being considered just a star vehicle for Madonna. Rex Reed of The New York Observer said: "If there is one thing worse than a Guy Ritchie movie, it's a Guy Ritchie movie with Madonna in it." Newsday critic John Anderson said, "New ways of describing badness need to be invented to describe exactly how bad it is." Joe Queenan of The Guardian discussed the movie in an article on what makes a movie the worst of all time and said, " Showgirls has a certain campy allure that grows a bit each time I see it. Madonna's Swept Away doesn't; it seems more amateurish on each viewing, like a morass that starts out as a quagmire, then morphs into a cesspool and finally turns into a slime pit on the road to its ultimate destination in the bowels of Hell." Julie Burchill, also from The Guardian, selected it as her pick for the worst film ever made.
Swept Away was also a box-office bomb; against a $10 million budget, it grossed $598,645 in the United States and around $437,875 from foreign territories for a worldwide total gross of $1,036,520. It received five awards at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards and became the first film to win both Worst Picture and Worst Remake or Sequel. At the 25th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years, and at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst Picture of the Decade, but 'lost' to Battlefield Earth at both ceremonies. Empire ranked it #20 in its list of "The 50 Worst Movies Ever", and After Ellen ranked it #7 in its list of "The worst movies ever to grace the screen".
The Master of Disguise (2002)
Main article: The Master of DisguiseThe comedy film The Master of Disguise was produced in part by Adam Sandler and stars Dana Carvey as Pistachio Disguisey, an undercover Italian waiter who must save his father Fabbrizio (James Brolin) from the evil Devlin Bowman (Brent Spiner) by using his inherent skills in disguise. Although the film was a box office success, it received scathing reviews from critics upon its release, many of which pointed out its sophomoric plot, unfunny humor (in particular, its flatulence gags) and disguises that would clearly not be recognized by children (such as Tony Montana from Scarface). Many critics also pointed out the short running time, consisting of 72 minutes of the film itself and over ten minutes of end credits juxtaposed with outtakes, including two post credit scenes. Roger Ebert gave it one star out of four, claiming, "The movie is a desperate miscalculation. It gives poor Dana Carvey nothing to do that is really funny, and then expects us to laugh because he acts so goofy all the time." Alan Morrison, writing for Empire, proclaimed that The Master of Disguise was "the worst film ever made: a film about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots", while Matthew Turner of ViewLondon remarked, "This is a serious contender for the title of The Worst Film Ever Made." The film holds a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 104 reviews, and is featured on the site's list of the top 100 worst-reviewed films of all time. It also appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. A cameo appearance by Bo Derek landed her a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards, but she lost to Madonna for Die Another Day.
Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002)
Main article: Ballistic: Ecks vs. SeverThe action film Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever stars Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu as opposing secret agents. Critics panned it, generally regarding it as having no redeeming features, not even the unintentional comedic value normally associated with bad films. They variously described the film as "A picture for idiots", "Boring to an amazing degree", "A fine achievement in stupidity and dullness", "Dreadful", " new meaning to the word incoherent", and "bad on just about every level". One critic suggested an alternative title as "Simplistic: Bullets Vs. Humans".
Stephen Hunter of The Washington Post wrote, "You could run this film backward, soundtrack included, and it would make no less sense." Roger Ebert called the movie "a chaotic mess, overloaded with special effects and explosions, light on continuity, sanity and coherence." In addition to being lambasted by critics, it was a disaster financially, recouping just over $19.9 million of its $70 million budget. In March 2007, Rotten Tomatoes ranked it #1 among "The Worst of the Worst" movie list, with 108 "rotten" reviews and no "fresh" ones. Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever remains the worst reviewed film on Rotten Tomatoes, as it is at the top of their 100 Worst Films of All time list. Mental Floss has also nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Ebert included it in his "most hated" list.
Ben and Arthur (2002)
Main article: Ben and ArthurA low-budget 2002 American romantic drama film about the titular gay couple who come into conflict with Arthur's religious brother, Ben and Arthur was written, directed, produced, edited, and scored by Sam Mraovich, who also played the character Arthur. Ben and Arthur received strong criticism (especially from the LGBT community) for its low budget and poor plotting. BuzzFeed described it as the "worst gay movie of all time". The gay popular culture site Queerty described Ben and Arthur as "unintelligible" and ended its review by calling it the "Worst. Movie. Ever." The gay movie review site Cinemaqueer likewise stated: "Ben and Arthur is so terrible that it has awoken the dormant Bette Davis in me. It is so painfully bad that it wouldn't even make good fodder on Mystery Science Theater 3000. This just might possibly be the worst movie I have ever seen ... Unless you get a kick out of mocking bad films, avoid this one at all costs." Michael Adams, reviewing the film for his book Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies, describes it thus: "Ben & Arthur is as over-the-top insane as it is ludicrously executed ... the production values, from biscuits on plates comprising the main course of a candlelit dinner to a church literally having a cardboard cross and a cartoon Jesus on the wall, are as bad as anything I've seen." A Rotten Tomatoes article placed Ben and Arthur on their list of "Films So Bad They're Unmissable", saying "If Tommy Wiseau's The Room is the over-wrought, melodramatic and self-pitying heterosexual camp classic of choice, then Sam Mraovich's Ben & Arthur is its gay equivalent." Rotten Tomatoes also stated "Every scene, every line, every hissy fit is simultaneously hilariously amateur and hysterically fever-pitched." Total Film ranked Ben and Arthur at No. 58 in their list of the 66 worst films of all time. Mraovich finds Ben and Arthur's placement among the canon of worst films to be a blessing as the film has received more attention than he ever anticipated.
From Justin to Kelly (2003)
Main article: From Justin to KellyThe romantic-comedy musical From Justin to Kelly stars Kelly Clarkson and Justin Guarini, the winner and runner-up, respectively, of the first season of American Idol. The film was a critical and commercial disaster, earning only $4.9 million at the North American box office and achieving a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 63 reviews. Josh Tyrangiel of Time Magazine described From Justin to Kelly as "a monstrous Idol movie musical that in the most generous light is the worst film so far this century", while The Free Lance–Star referred to it as "the world's worst movie". Nathan Rabin, reviewing the film for his "My Year of Flops" series, stated, "All films require suspension of disbelief. From Justin To Kelly requires something more like a temporary lobotomy. Nothing about the main characters or their relationships makes sense." It won a special Razzie—"Governor's Award – Distinguished Under-Achievement in Choreography"—at the 24th Golden Raspberry Awards. It was nominated for eight additional Razzies (including a second special award, "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie"), and a year later it won for Worst "Musical" of Our First 25 Years. Total Film, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included From Justin to Kelly on their worst film lists. In a later interview, Clarkson expressed regret over From Justin to Kelly, stating she only did it because she was contractually obligated to do so: "I knew when I read the script it was going to be real, real bad, but when I won, I signed that piece of paper, and I could not get out of it."
The Room (2003)
Main article: The RoomThe independently produced The Room, about an amiable banker whose friends betray him one by one, has been called "the Citizen Kane of bad movies" by some critics. The Guardian, Vox, The Washington Post, ABC Australia and Süddeutsche Zeitung called it the worst film ever made. Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of The A.V. Club called it "the greatest bad movie of our time" and said, "The Room is nearly an anti-film—an inane and unintentionally surreal soap opera, filled with non-sequiturs, confused characters, and gratuitous, anatomically incorrect sex." Though the film's star, writer, producer, and director Tommy Wiseau has claimed it is a black comedy and its numerous flaws are intentional, other actors involved in the production have denied this, saying that Wiseau intended it as a melodramatic romance.
The Room has been noted for its bizarre and non-sequiturial dialogue, protracted sex scenes, various subplots that are inadequately resolved or simply disappear altogether (most notably, a character announces that she has been diagnosed with breast cancer, but this is never mentioned again throughout the entire film), and infamous use of green-screen for "outdoor" rooftop scenes. It made its broadcast premiere as an April Fools' Day special in 2009 on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim block, edited down from its original R rating to a TV-14/DSLV rating; it would prove so popular the network continued to air the film on April 1 as a tradition for several years, to the point the 2012 prank for the network consisted of playing the first few minutes before suddenly cutting off for an unannounced one-night revival of their Toonami block, with block host T.O.M first greeting the audience as Wiseau's character does, declaring "Oh, hai, Adult Swim". The day after its appearance, its DVD became the top-selling independent film on Amazon.com. In June 2010, The Room started playing at the American Film Institute Silver Theatre in Silver Spring, Maryland. Mystery Science Theater 3000 alumni Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through their site RiffTrax.com. In 2013, the book The Disaster Artist, written by Greg Sestero and Tom Bissell, was published; the book is Sestero's memoir of his involvement in the production of the movie. The book was adapted into the Oscar-nominated film of the same name, directed by and starring James Franco as Wiseau (winning a Best Actor Golden Globe Award for his performance) and his brother Dave Franco as Sestero. A remake starring Bob Odenkirk was set to be released in June 2023 to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the film's release, but was delayed.
Gigli (2003)
Main article: GigliThe Martin Brest movie Gigli features Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck, with appearances by Al Pacino and Christopher Walken. Gigli was originally a black comedy with no romantic subplot, but the producers demanded script rewrites throughout filming, hoping to cash in on the Lopez–Affleck romance that was then big news in celebrity-watching publications such as Us and People. This film cost $54 million to make but grossed only $6 million, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time. The Times gave the film a zero, making Gigli the lowest-scored film review in the publication's history at that time. The Wall Street Journal stated that it was "he worst movie—all right, the worst allegedly major movie—of our admittedly young century", while Roger Friedman of Fox News claimed it was "he worst movie ever made". It was also the winner of seven Razzies (including 2005's Worst "Comedy" of Our First 25 Years), and in 2010 the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for "Worst Picture of the Decade". It is in Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 worst-reviewed movies of the 2000s, where it has a 6% rating. AfterEllen ranked Gigli number 1 in its list of the worst films of all time. Empire, Screen Rant, and Digital Trends also listed it as one of the worst films ever made.
Sex Lives of the Potato Men (2004)
Main article: Sex Lives of the Potato MenThe 2004 British sex comedy Sex Lives of the Potato Men is about the sex lives of a group of potato delivery men in Birmingham. The film received strongly hostile reviews from the British media. Reviews claimed Sex Lives of the Potato Men was unfunny, disgusting, and depressing. Writing in the Daily Mirror, film critic Kevin O'Sullivan called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the worst films ever made". Novelist Will Self, in his review for The Evening Standard, called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "mirthless, worthless, toothless, useless". The Times reviewer James Christopher dubbed Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the two most nauseous films ever made ... a masterclass in film-making ineptitude". The Sunday Express film critic, Henry Fitzherbert, also strongly condemned the film: "Sex Lives is so awful it left me slack-jawed in disbelief ... it must be one of the worst British comedies." Catherine Shoard, in a critique in The Sunday Telegraph, stated "It's hard to know what to say to this – it's like finding the right words at a nasty accident ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men is probably the lewdest Brit-com since Confessions of a Window Cleaner, and certainly the worst." Shoard also described the film as "Less a film than an appetite suppressant." Alan Morrison in the Scottish Daily Record described it as "puerile smut of the very worst kind ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men should never have been made". The Irish Times later noted that "Sex Lives of the Potato Men attracted some of the worst reviews in living memory." The Birmingham Post described Sex Lives of the Potato Men as "quite possibly the worst film ever made", while The Independent on Sunday stated that the film was "a strong contender for the title of worst film of all time". It was also featured in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll. The film has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 14 reviews.
Catwoman (2004)
Main article: Catwoman (film)Nominally based on the DC Comics character, Catwoman stars Halle Berry as the title character. The film was the result of various rewrites by a total of 28 different screenwriters, though only four were credited after arbitration with the Writers Guild of America. It has a 9% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, and was declared "arguably the worst superhero film ever made" by the Orlando Sentinel. Jean Lowerison of the San Diego Metropolitan said in her review that Catwoman "goes on my 'worst' list for the year, and quite possibly for all time". Sadaf Ahsan of the National Post went further, calling it the worst movie ever made. The Village Voice summed up reviews of the film under the title "Me-Ouch". The movie was the winner of four Razzies for Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Director (Pitof) and Worst Screenplay. Berry arrived at the ceremony to accept her Razzie in person (with her Best Actress Oscar for Monster's Ball in hand), saying: "First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of shit, god-awful movie ... It was just what my career needed." Roger Ebert included it in his "most hated" list, being joined by Screen Rant and Flavorwire, who also included it in their worst film lists.
Daniel – Der Zauberer (Daniel – The Wizard) (2004)
Main article: Daniel – Der ZaubererThe German film Daniel – Der Zauberer was directed by Ulli Lommel and stars pop singer and ex-Deutschland sucht den Superstar contestant Daniel Küblböck, who appeared as a fictionalized version of himself. The Daily Dot wrote that it is considered to be the worst German film, while n-tv said it was "possibly the worst movie ever made". The website filmstarts.de states that Daniel – Der Zauberer was "unbearable for non-fans of Küblböck", adding that "the performances of the actors were some of the worst in the history of German cinema", and alleging that Ulli Lommel and producer Peter Schamoni had "damaged their reputation". Years after its release, Küblböck admitted that, in retrospect, "ou have to say this is the worst movie of all time really".
The film also performed extremely poorly at the box office, having only 13,834 viewers altogether, which led to it being withdrawn from screening at most cinemas within the first week, with RP Online referring to it as a "super-flop". It is consistently listed at IMDb's Bottom 100 list and became the lowest-rated film at one point. Total Film listed it as the third worst film of all time, after Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 and the direct-to-video animated mockbuster Titanic: The Legend Goes On, while Fotogramas and New York Daily News included it on their worst film lists. Filmstarts.de ranked it number 4 in its list of the 25 worst movies ever made, and on the German movie rating site Moviepilot.de, it is the lowest-rated film with an average rating of 0.4/10. In 2016, it was showcased on SchleFaZ, a German television show featuring the worst film ever made.
Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 (2004)
Main article: Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2The family-oriented comedy Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 was the last film directed by Bob Clark (of A Christmas Story fame) before his death. It is a sequel to the 1999 film Baby Geniuses and like its predecessor, it received negative reviews from film critics. Following the plot of the first film, four babies can communicate with each other using 'baby talk', and have knowledge of many secrets. The "baby geniuses" become involved in a scheme by media mogul Bill Biscane (Jon Voight), a notorious kidnapper of children, who intends to use a satellite system to brainwash the world's population and force them to watch TV for the rest of their lives.
The film was a box-office bomb, only receiving $9 million from its $20 million budget. MovieWeb writer B. Alan Orange considers it the worst movie ever made, Entertainment Weekly writer Joshua Rivera stated that it was the worst movie he had ever sat through, and Tom Long of The Deseret News said "It is perhaps the most incompetent and least funny comic film ever made." It was nominated for four Golden Raspberry Awards including Worst Picture, Worst Director (Bob Clark), Worst Supporting Actor (Jon Voight) and Worst Screenplay (Steven Paul (story) & Gregory Poppen). Total Film named it the runner-up to Titanic: The Legend Goes On in its list of the worst films ever made, and Mental Floss selected it as the second worst movie ever made after Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever. It was ranked as the worst sequel of all time by Rotten Tomatoes and, with a score of 0%, it is included in their list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.
Alone in the Dark (2005)
Main article: Alone in the Dark (2005 film)Loosely based on a series of video games by Infogrames and directed by Uwe Boll, the German-Canadian-American film Alone in the Dark was panned by critics for a multitude of reasons, including poor script and production values, quick cuts to optimize the gory content, almost no connection to the game, and bad acting. The movie received a 1% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, was the second worst reviewed movie of the 2000s, and appears in their top 100 worst-reviewed movies list. It appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, which they gave a 9/100 to, is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list, and is one of the few films to have received an F rating on CinemaScore.
Roger Moore of The Orlando Sentinel stated: "Alone in the Dark shows just how tenuous Plan 9 from Outer Space's hold on that 'worst movie ever' title really is." Likewise, Peter Hartlaub, the San Francisco Chronicle's pop culture critic, called the film "the best Ed Wood movie ever made ... a film so mind-blowingly horrible that it teeters on the edge of cinematic immortality." In 2009, he named it the worst film of the decade. Jeffrey Lyles of The Gazette considered it so bad that "other legendary bad films ... await a film of this magnitude because it gets awfully lonely on the island of misfit movies", while Scott Nash of Three Movie Buffs dubbed it "one of the worst movies ever made."
Screenwriter Blair Erickson wrote about his experience dealing with Boll and his original script, which was closer to the actual game itself, and Boll's script change demands on the comedy website Something Awful. It received two 2005 Golden Raspberry Awards nominations for Worst Director (Uwe Boll) and Worst Actress (Tara Reid), and won three 2005 Stinkers Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Special Effects. Empire, Flavorwire and Screen Rant all later included the film on their respective lists for the worst films ever made.
Aag (2007)
Main article: Aag (2007 film)Aag is a remake of one of the most successful Hindi films, Sholay, directed by Ram Gopal Varma. Rajeev Masand gave it a zero out of five. Times of India stated that Aag "destroyed Bollywood's greatest film" and acknowledged that some "consider it the world's worst film". Hindustan Times awarded it the "Lifetime's Worst Ever Movie Award". It came in first in a FHM India list of the 57 worst movies ever made. Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time. Amitabh Bachchan, who appeared in the original film and returned for the remake, later admitted that the film was "a mistake".
Epic Movie (2007)
Main article: Epic MovieEpic Movie is a parody film by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer that mainly parodies epic and fantasy movies, most notably The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and the Harry Potter films, but also contains references to all kinds of other then-popular films. Like most works of Friedberg and Seltzer, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, and a Metacritic score of 17/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".
Harry Fletcher of The Standard said: "Filmmakers and trash-peddlers Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer have been responsible for some of the most pointless, lazy and unforgivable movies of the past decade and frankly, they need to be stopped. Disaster Movie, 300 spoof Meet the Spartans and awful Hunger Games mickey-take The Starving Games could easily have made this list of the worst movies ever made, but Epic Movie might be the worst of the lot." Meanwhile, Jamie Russell of the BBC called it "the most excruciating, unfunny film you'll see this year... if not your entire lifetime." Likewise, Nathan Rabin gave it an F score and said, "Epic Movie strays so far from the solid fundamentals of filmmaking that it calls the very foundation of humor into question."
At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received three nominations, for Worst Remake or Rip-off, Worst Screenplay and Worst Supporting Actress (Carmen Electra). It is included in Rotten Tomatoes' list of the 100 Worst Movies of All time, Empire's and Flavorwire's lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, Standard's list of the 12 worst films ever made, MRQE's 50 worst movies list and Newsweek's list of the 50 worst comedy movies of all time.
I Know Who Killed Me (2007)
Main article: I Know Who Killed MeI Know Who Killed Me is a psychological thriller film directed by Chris Sivertson and starring Lindsay Lohan as identical twins, one of whom insists her identity is that of another woman after being abducted by a serial killer. At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it set a record for most awards won in a single year by winning eight awards and it received two further nominations at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards.
The How Did This Get Made? podcast questioned, "Is this the worst movie Lindsay Lohan has ever been in or flat out the worst movie ever?" Richard Roeper selected the film as the worst of the 2000s. Gabe Delahaye of Stereogum reviewed I Know Who Killed Me as part of his search for the worst movie ever made, writing that: "Out of all the possible Worst Movies of All Time so far, none has been as painful to actually watch as I Know Who Killed Me". It was named the 34th worst movie ever made in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll and After Ellen named it the second worst ever made, after Gigli. MRQE includes it on its 50 Worst Movies list, and it has a rare F rating on CinemaScore.
Disaster Movie (2008)
Main article: Disaster MovieDisaster Movie is a parody film written and directed by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, spoofing films in the disaster film genre. The film, like most films by Friedberg and Seltzer, received extremely negative reviews and has a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 73 reviews. The site's consensus states: "Returning to their seemingly bottomless well of flatulence humor, racial stereotypes, and stale pop culture gags, Friedberg and Seltzer have produced what is arguably their worst Movie yet." It was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as one of the worst-reviewed films of all time. Jason Solomons of The Guardian stated that "Nothing can convey the grimness of Disaster Movie, which would be the Worst Movie Ever Made were it actually a movie at all." Adam Tobias of Watertown Daily Times claimed that "I just don't see how anyone could not find Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time." Tobias went on to write that the title was appropriate because the film is "a disaster." It was featured in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll, Total Film's 66 Worst Movies Ever list, Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list (where it holds a score of 17, the lowest score on the site). Disaster Movie also received a rare F rating on CinemaScore. The film is also notable for being the motion picture debut of Kim Kardashian, whose performance garnered a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards alongside five additional nominations.
Meet the Spartans (2008)
Main article: Meet the SpartansAnother 2008 parody movie by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, Meet the Spartans mainly parodied the movie 300, but references to numerous other films as well. Like most Friedberg and Seltzer projects, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus reading: "A tired, unfunny, offensive waste of time, Meet the Spartans scrapes the bottom of the cinematic barrel.", and a Metacritic score of 9/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike". Josh Levin of Slate called it the worst movie he had ever seen. It is included in Empire's and Flavorwire's lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, News.com.au's list of the 15 worst films of all time, Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films and MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. At the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received five nominations, including Worst Picture.
The Hottie and the Nottie (2008)
Main article: The Hottie and the NottieThe romantic comedy The Hottie and the Nottie starring Paris Hilton, Joel Moore, Christine Lakin, and The Greg Wilson opened to poor box-office takings and strongly negative reviews with a 5% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The British newspaper The People, reviewing The Hottie and the Nottie, claimed "Paris Hilton is the world's worst actress and she's starring in the worst movie ever made." Nathan Lee of The Village Voice called it "crass, shrill, disingenuous, tawdry, mean-spirited, vulgar, idiotic, boring, slapdash, half-assed, and very, very unfunny". Online film critic James Berardinelli described the film's comedy as "about as funny as the anal rape scene in The War Zone". Richard Roeper called it "excruciatingly, painfully, horribly, terribly awful", and argued that "nobody in this movie really should have a career in movies". Connie Ogle in the Miami Herald described The Hottie and the Nottie thus: "Imagine the worst movie you've ever seen. Got it? Now try to think of something worse. That something is this movie – wretched, embarrassing and a waste of the time and energy of everyone involved." The film appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films, and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.
Álom.net (2009)
Main article: Álom.netÁlom.net (also known as Dream Well or Dream.net) is a Hungarian film that emulates tropes found in American teen films. 444.hu wrote that it is "the worst movie of all time, and that's why it became a cult film". Furthermore, 24.hu and Index.hu each named it the worst Hungarian film ever made and The Irish Times reported its status as "the worst film of all time" when it became the lowest-rated film on IMDb. Total Film named it the fourth worst film ever made and FMC.hu included it on their list of the ten worst films ever made.
2010s
Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2010)
Main article: Birdemic: Shock and TerrorAn independently produced film that is an apparent homage to Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, Birdemic: Shock and Terror tells the story of a romance between the two leading characters, played by Alan Bagh and Whitney Moore, as their small town is attacked by birds. Written, directed, and produced by James Nguyen, it was intended as a "romantic thriller" but is notable due to its poor quality, with reviewers calling out its wooden acting, bad dialogue, amateurish sound and editing, nonsensical plot and, in particular, its special effects, consisting primarily of poorly rendered computer generated eagles and vultures that perform physically awkward aerial maneuvers and explode upon impact with the ground.
The film, which cost $10,000 to make, was called by the Huffington Post "truly, one of the worst films ever made" and by The Village Voice as "one more in the pantheon of beloved trash-terpieces". Flavorwire ranked it number 1 in its list of the 50 worst films ever made. Slate deemed it among the worst movies ever made, while Salon referred to it as "a cult hit among bad-movie fans" and Variety stated that the film displayed "all the revered hallmarks of hilariously bad filmmaking". Following the home media release of Birdemic, Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through Rifftrax. They later riffed upon the film again theatrically. In response to the cult status of the first film, a sequel—Birdemic 2: The Resurrection—was released in 2013, and included many returning members of the cast and crew. Another sequel was released on several streaming platforms on January 24, 2023 titled Birdemic: Sea Eagle.
The Last Airbender (2010)
Main article: The Last Airbender (film)The Last Airbender is a fantasy adventure film written, produced, and directed by M. Night Shyamalan and is based on the Nickelodeon animated TV series Avatar: The Last Airbender. Upon release, the film was widely panned with critics pointing out the bad acting, numerous plot holes, screenplay, dialogue, poor special effects (despite its reported $150 million budget), and especially Shyamalan's directing. It was also ridiculed for the poor quality of its post-converted 3-D, and the casting of white and Indian actors to portray characters who were interpreted as East Asian or Inuit in the source material triggered accusations of racism and whitewashing. Further criticism came from fans of the original cartoon series, who said the film differed tremendously from its critically acclaimed source material. David Onda of Comcast wrote that it "has been called one of the worst ever made. The movie was universally panned by critics and failed to make back its production budget domestically." Roger Ebert wrote, "The Last Airbender is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that." When asked if Last Airbender had been the worst film he has ever seen, Mike Ryan of Vanity Fair answered, "Yes."
It garnered nine nominations at the 31st Golden Raspberry Awards, and won five, including Worst Picture and Worst Director. Hi highlighted the film in their "Worst Films Ever" series, and Rotten Tomatoes, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included it in their worst film lists. Dev Patel would later express regret and dislike for his role and his experience with the film. He described his performance as Prince Zuko as being as though he "saw a stranger on the screen that I couldn't relate to."
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011)
Main article: Bucky Larson: Born to Be a StarBucky Larson: Born to Be a Star was produced by Adam Sandler's Happy Madison Productions and featured Nick Swardson in the titular role as a small-town manchild who pursues a career in the pornographic film industry after learning that his parents were porn stars in the 1970s. On Rotten Tomatoes, Bucky Larson has a 3% rating, and it appears on the site's list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Linda Cook of the Quad-City Times described the film as "the worst of the worst", while ScreenCrush critic Matt Singer picked it as the worst film ever made. Jim Vorel of Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column suggested that Bucky Larson was the worst film covered by the column. In listing it as one of the ten worst comedies ever, Michael Musto stated that Bucky Larson was "a badness the world had forgotten was capable of existing". Screen Rant included it in its list of the 25 worst movies in film history and Mental Floss named it the fifth worst movie ever. Bucky Larson also appears on MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list, and Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films. The film earned six nominations at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, but lost in every category to Jack and Jill, which was also produced by Happy Madison Productions.
Jack and Jill (2011)
Main article: Jack and Jill (2011 film)Jack and Jill is a comedy film starring Adam Sandler as Jack, a commercial director, who is visited by his "identical" twin sister, Jill (played by Sandler, in drag), during the holidays. Salon stated that Jack and Jill "received some of the worst reviews of any movie ever" upon its release. In the film, Jill is wooed by Al Pacino, whom Jack wants to be in his Dunkin' Donuts commercial. Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times noted the irony of Pacino's presence, as the actor is best known for playing Michael Corleone in The Godfather, which is widely considered one of the best films ever made, in this film, which he called "one of the worst movies in the history of cinema!" Ramin Setoodeh of The Daily Beast and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone reviewed it together in an article entitled "Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made". After an hour-long critique, RedLetterMedia claimed that it was "so egregious that it ceased to be a film", and the site also later called it "the worst thing in the world". Mike McGranaghan wrote, on his website The Aisle Seat: "Howard the Duck, Gigli, Showgirls, From Justin to Kelly. What do they all have in common? They're all widely considered among the worst big studio movies ever made. You know what else they have in common? They're all better than Jack and Jill." Jack and Jill won a record 10 awards at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, sweeping every category. It broke the record previously held by Battlefield Earth for having the most Razzies earned by a single film and is the only film to win every possible award. The film holds a 3% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, where it ranks as being one of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time. Vanity Fair and Screen Rant have also included it on their respective worst film lists.
That's My Boy (2012)
Main article: That's My Boy (2012 film)Another comedy film starring Adam Sandler, That's My Boy concerns a middle school student named Donny Berger who has sex with his teacher, gets her pregnant, and in turn, earns a lifestyle of a minor celebrity, something he never intended to happen. Years later, Donny (played by Sandler) crashes his now-adult son's (Andy Samberg) wedding and bachelor party to get money to pay his taxes, therefore avoiding prison. The film has been widely panned due to its comedic portrayal of incest, hebephilia, statutory rape, and gerontophilia, with film critic Andrew O'Hehir of Salon stating, " new movie about a rape survivor and his estranged son is supposed to be funny, but radiates pain and rage." Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times proclaimed, "To say That's My Boy is one of the worst movies of the year is to insult 2012. This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen", while Richard Haridly of Quickflix called it "one of the saddest and most exhausting" films he has ever seen. MaryAnn Johanson of Flick Filosopher outright panned the film for its inability to generate laughs as well as its depraved content, calling it "a disgusting excuse for a comedy" and possibly "the most repulsive movie I've ever seen", and Jonathan Lack of We Got This Covered declared, "That's My Boy isn't just the worst film of 2012, it's one of the most morally reprehensible comedies of all time, a disgusting movie you should stay far, far away from." Furthermore, Ed Whitfield of The Ooh Tray stated, "It may be the worst film, in any genre, ever made". In addition to the movie's overwhelmingly negative reviews, That's My Boy earned eight nominations at the 33rd Golden Raspberry Awards, such as Worst Picture and Worst Director, and won the awards for Worst Actor (Sandler) and Worst Screenplay. It holds a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of April 17, 2019 based on 115 reviews.
Foodfight! (2012)
Main article: Foodfight!The animated comedy Foodfight!, directed by Larry Kasanoff, features a cast of celebrity voice actors, including Charlie Sheen, Wayne Brady, Hilary Duff, and Eva Longoria. The film revolves around brand mascots, known as "Ikes", who come to life in a supermarket after closing time, and their struggles against the forces of Brand X. Several actual corporate mascots make cameos in the movie, such as Mrs. Butterworth, Charlie the Tuna, and the California Raisins. Development for the movie began as early as 2000, but troubled production, including an incident where the hard drives had supposedly been stolen, and financial difficulties delayed its release several times. The film eventually received a limited theatrical release in Europe in 2012, and it became a box-office bomb, earning just $74,000 against its reported $65 million budget. Foodfight! was also critically panned for its animation, humor, use of product placement as a central theme (and being aimed towards children), and content inappropriate for its target audience, such as sexual innuendo and references to Nazism.
A New York Times article condemned the film, saying: "The animation appears unfinished ... And the plot ... is impenetrable and even offensive." The article also reported that Foodfight! had been "seized upon by Internet purveyors of bad cinema". One such Internet critic was Nathan Rabin of The A.V. Club, who included the film in his My World of Flops column, describing it as "one of those fall-of-civilization moments" and "This is the kind of movie so unbelievably, surreally and exquisitely terrible that you want to share it with the rest of the world. I was put on earth to suffer through abominations like Foodfight! so that society as a whole might benefit from my Christ-like sacrifice." Meanwhile, a review in Esquire described it as "The Room, rendered in horribly sharp polygons" and Hollywood News called it "by far the crappiest piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune to watch". Likewise, critic Tim Brayton described it as "the absolute ugliest animated feature that has ever been released by something resembling an actual animation studio ... one of the very worst movies I have ever seen." In 2024, Collider described it as the "absolute worst of the 21st century, without any real competition." Digital Trends, Time Out, Fotogramas, Mental Floss and MSN have since included Foodfight! in their worst film lists. Rebecca Hawkes of The Daily Telegraph described Foodfight! as "the worst animated children's film ever made", while IndieWire, Comic Book Resources and Screen Rant have each described it as being one of the worst animated films ever made.
Run for Your Wife (2012)
Main article: Run for Your Wife (2012 film)A British comedy film based on the stage farce of the same name, Run for Your Wife starred Danny Dyer as John Smith, a bigamist, and Denise van Outen and Sarah Harding as his wives. Run for Your Wife was directed by the author of the play, Ray Cooney (who also makes an uncredited cameo appearance). Upon release, Run for Your Wife was savaged by film critics, with the South African newspaper Daily News saying "Run for Your Wife could be the worst film in history", the Studio Briefing website reporting that "Some writers are making the case that the British comedy may be 'the worst film ever'", and The Daily Mirror claiming Run for Your Wife "was branded the worst British film ever". Run for Your Wife met with such overwhelmingly negative reviews upon release that the reviews themselves were widely reported in the UK media. The film was variously described as "a catastrophe", "as funny as leprosy" and "30 years past its sell-by-date", with The Guardian reviewer Peter Bradshaw saying that it "makes The Dick Emery Show look edgy and contemporary". The Independent's Anthony Quinn wrote, "The stage play ran for nine years – it will be lucky to run for nine days. Perhaps never in the field of light entertainment have so many actors sacrificed so much dignity in the cause of so few jokes ... From the look of it, Cooney hasn't been in a cinema for about 30 years".
The cast featured numerous British celebrities in cameo roles, which was commented upon by several reviewers. The Metro commented that "no one emerges unscathed among the cameo-packed cast that reads largely like a roll-call for Brit TV legends you'd previously suspected deceased". The Daily Record described the film as "an exasperating farce containing not one single, solitary laugh. Comprised of people losing their trousers and falling over, the film looks like a pilot for a (mercifully) never-commissioned 70s sitcom". An article in the Independent described Run for Your Wife (along with the similarly panned Movie 43) as contenders for the title of the "worst film in history". The Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette reported "critics have been queuing up to batter recent release Run for Your Wife, with general agreement that it ranks among the worst British comedies of all time". Run for Your Wife was also a box office bomb, earning only £602 in its opening weekend at the British box office to its £900,000 budget. Run for Your Wife has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of July 29, 2015 based on 15 reviews.
Fateful Findings (2012)
Main article: Fateful FindingsFateful Findings is a 2012 independent techno-thriller written, directed and produced by Neil Breen. Breen also starred in the film and took on most of the crew roles, including film editor, sound editor, accountant, caterer, set designer, wardrobe, makeup and casting. The film follows an author-turned-hacker with supernatural powers who uses his abilities to reveal vague "government and corporate secrets", while beset by numerous relationship dramas, and ends with an extended sequence at a press conference where politicians and businesspeople confess to corruption and kill themselves before an applauding crowd.
Writing for Film Threat, reviewer Mike Hodges described it as "the worst movie ever made", comparing it unfavorably to Troll 2 and The Room. Nathan Rabin, writing for Rotten Tomatoes, said Fateful Findings threatens The Room's position as "best worst movie", while reviewers of the podcast The Flop House said "Move over The Room, move over Birdemic" and Mystery Science Theater 3000 head writer Elliott Kalan described it as the "good-est bad movie, maybe, I've ever seen". Paste Magazine said Fateful Findings sits "right next to on the Mt. Rushmore of bad movies", and noted that while Tommy Wiseau had eventually embraced and encouraged mockery of The Room, Breen doesn't "pretend to be 'in on it'" and the film maintains a "magic" as sincere outsider art. Screen Rant and the New York Daily News later listed it as one of the worst films of all time.
Movie 43 (2013)
Main article: Movie 43Produced and co-directed by Peter Farrelly, among others, Movie 43 is a gross-out sex comedy film consisting of several vignettes each by a different director and a sizable cast of recognizable actors and actresses including Dennis Quaid, Greg Kinnear, Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslet, Liev Schreiber, Naomi Watts, Anna Faris, Emma Stone, Richard Gere, Uma Thurman, Chloë Grace Moretz, Gerard Butler, Halle Berry, Stephen Merchant, Kristen Bell, Terrence Howard, Elizabeth Banks, Kate Bosworth, Johnny Knoxville, Justin Long, Chris Pratt, Josh Duhamel, and Jason Sudeikis. Holding a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes, it is included on the site's 100 Worst Movies of All Time list, and is also on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list. Movie 43 won three awards at the 34th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay. In the Worst Director category, all 13 directors won the award.
Several critics have called it one of the worst films ever made, including Peter Howell of the Toronto Star, who said, "There's just one use for Movie 43, apart from it being ground into the landfill that it deserves to become sooner rather than later. It provides me with a handy new answer to a question I'm often asked: 'What's the worst film you've ever seen?'" Brady Murphy of Murphy Reviews wrote that the movie "had no heart" and gave it the site's first zero out of ten rating. Meanwhile, Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times voiced similar hatred, calling it "aggressively tasteless" and "the Citizen Kane of awful." Lou Lumenick stated, "If you mashed-up the worst parts of the infamous Howard the Duck, Gigli, Ishtar and every other awful movie I've seen since I started reviewing professionally in 1981, it wouldn't begin to approach the sheer soul-sucking badness of the cringe-inducing Movie 43." Elizabeth Weitzman of the New York Daily News also considered it the worst movie she ever saw.
Humshakals (2014)
Main article: HumshakalsA Bollywood comedy film directed by Sajid Khan, Humshakals featured Indian actors Saif Ali Khan, Ram Kapoor and Riteish Deshmukh. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on six reviews, with an average rating of 2/10. Mihir Fadnavis wrote in his Firstpost review, "sexual tomfoolery, shrieking and hamming aside, there's much more to hate about this 'family movie'. It's disturbing to see such an atrocious, regressive, misogynistic, sexist, homophobic cinematic product force-fed to paying audiences. I can understand that a comedy need not be 'safe', but what goes on in Humshakals is simply too horrifying to bear." Saurabh Dwivedi of India Today stated "I can only say that Humshakals will be listed in one of the worst films of the century." Writing in Emirates 24/7, Sneha May Francis said that it succeeded Khan's previous endeavor, Himmatwala, in becoming the worst Bollywood film ever. Fadnavis went further, writing that it displaced Himmatwala as the "worst possible product any film industry in the world can offer". Itrath Syed of The Georgia Straight stated that Humshakals was "the absolute bottom of the cinematic barrel". The film received five Golden Kela Award nominations, and won the "award" for Worst Film. It also won two Ghanta Awards; the film won Worst Picture and Ram Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan and Riteish Deshmukh shared the Worst Actor award.
Several of the cast members also lamented their involvement in the film. Despite being the film's leading actress, Bipasha Basu did not participate in the film's promotions because she was "extremely disturbed by the end result" and stated that "Humshakals was the worst experience of my life". Another cast member, actress Esha Gupta, warned her family to not watch the film. After the release of the film, leading actor Saif Ali Khan lamented that "I've been introspecting a lot and will never repeat a mistake that was Humshakals."
Saving Christmas (2014)
Main article: Saving ChristmasSaving Christmas is a faith-based Christmas comedy film starring Kirk Cameron, who plays a fictionalized version of himself attempting to convince his brother-in-law (played by the film's director, Darren Doane) that Christmas is still a Christian holiday. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on 19 reviews, with an average rating of 2.40/10. Critic David Keyes described Saving Christmas as "The worst holiday movie ever made", Billings Gazette selected the film as the worst Christmas movie of all time, and Will Nicol of Digital Trends included it on his list of the ten worst movies ever made. Christy Lemire picked Saving Christmas as the worst film she has ever reviewed and called it "The Room of Christmas movies" (while adding that she found The Room to be more enjoyable) and gave it a score of zero stars out of four. Reece Taylor of Comic Book Resources also considers it the worst film ever made. The film's history after release was further marred by widespread vote brigading; Cameron asked fans to give the film positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, which resulted in a backlash of Internet users instead travelling to the Rotten Tomatoes page to review bomb the film. Three weeks after its release, Saving Christmas became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's bottom 100 list. Cameron blamed the low rating on a Reddit campaign by "haters and atheists" to purposely lower the film's ratings. The film won four awards, including Worst Picture, at the 35th Golden Raspberry Awards.
United Passions (2014)
Main article: United PassionsA 2014 English-language French drama film about the origins of the football world governing body Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), United Passions starred Tim Roth (as FIFA President Sepp Blatter), Gérard Depardieu and Sam Neill and was directed by Frédéric Auburtin. United Passions' release in the U.S. occurred simultaneously with the 2015 FIFA corruption case, in which several current and former members of FIFA's executive committee were arrested on charges of corruption, and Blatter himself resigned following repeated accusations of corruption at FIFA under his leadership. United Passions was accused of ignoring these long-running claims. London Evening Standard's Des Kelly wrote that United Passions was "the worst movie ever made" and "the most extraordinary vanity exercise; a vile, self-aggrandizing, sugar-coated pile of manure". Sean Mahoney of Inquisitr called it the "worst movie ever". Daniel Gold of The New York Times claimed United Passions is "one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory, a dishonest bit of corporate-suite sanitizing that's no good even for laughs", later stating it would make the top three of his list of all time bad films. Several critics noted the irony of the film's depiction of Blatter as an anti-corruption campaigner. Paul Field of the Daily Mirror said that this created "unintentional comedy gold". On Rotten Tomatoes, United Passions has an approval rating of 0% based on 16 reviews, while on Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1 out of 100, based on 9 critics, and is tied for the lowest scoring film on the site. Screen Rant subsequently included it on its list of the 25 worst movies of all time.
United Passions was also a box-office bomb, becoming the second-lowest-grossing film ever in American history, with a total take of $918, surpassed only by the 2006 thriller Zyzzyx Road. The film additionally went directly to DVD in France and was not distributed in a number of other European countries. Several of the people involved in United Passions later expressed regret over the film. Director Auburtin called United Passions "a disaster" and added: "Now I'm seen as bad as the guy who brought AIDS to Africa or the guy who caused the financial crisis ... apparently I am a propaganda guy making films for corrupt people." Roth apologized for taking part in the film and admitted that he took the job in United Passions for the money. It also received the first Barry L. Bumstead Award during the 36th Golden Raspberry Awards, a special category for critical and financial failures that were not given an eligible release.
Dirty Grandpa (2016)
Main article: Dirty GrandpaDirty Grandpa, a 2016 comedy film starring Robert De Niro and Zac Efron as a grandfather and grandson going to Florida during spring break, received negative reviews for its gross-out and shock humor that was also considered as sexist, homophobic, and racist. Mike Ryan of Uproxx said: "Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen in a movie theater. Burn it." He later also picked it as the worst film he had ever both reviewed and seen. Pete Hammond of Deadline Hollywood said: "... Dirty Grandpa, is not just the worst movie has ever been in, but it may be the worst movie anyone has ever been in." Glenn McDonald of Indy Week said: "The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn ... In fact, in the dizzying moments after being bludgeoned by this miserable specimen, I was convinced it's among the worst movies ever made." Richard Roeper gave the film zero stars, writing, "If Dirty Grandpa isn't the worst movie of 2016, I have some serious cinematic torture in my near future." On his YouTube channel, Roeper also said: "I'm not ready to say Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen, but I'm also not ready to say it's not the worst movie I've ever seen." Mark Kermode, on his BBC Radio 5 Live show (Kermode and Mayo's Film Review), said that he found the film "truly, genuinely horrible" and went on to say, "after Dirty Grandpa I did feel genuinely unclean, I wanted to go and have a shower, because it's just so revolting. Somewhere in hell there is a multiplex playing this on a double bill, with Movie 43 and Entourage." He would later go on to brand it his least favorite film of 2016.
Glenn Kenny of RogerEbert.com said: "The actor Bela Lugosi appeared in some landmark, perhaps even great, films at the beginning of his Hollywood career in the 1930s. ... Lugosi's final film was 1957's Plan 9 from Outer Space, frequently cited as the worst film ever made. The cinematic landmarks of De Niro's career include films such as Coppola's The Godfather Part II and Scorsese's Raging Bull. He has been featured in a good number of very bad films in the years since. But this? This might just be his own Plan 9." The film has an approval rating of 10% at Rotten Tomatoes based on 135 reviews, with an average rating of 3.1/10, while on Metacritic it has a score of 21 out of 100 based on 27 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews". At the 37th Golden Raspberry Awards it received five nominations, for Worst Picture, Worst Actor (De Niro), Worst Screenplay, and two nominations for Worst Supporting Actress (Julianne Hough and Aubrey Plaza), but did not win in any category.
Guardians (2017)
Main article: Guardians (2017 film)Guardians is a 2017 Russian superhero film about a team of Soviet superheroes created during the Cold War. It was criticized for having a derivative plot, bad acting and direction, cheap CGI, plot holes, and overall low quality. Kg-portal.ru wrote that "Guardians is a film from which Russian cinema should be protected. It's like a sequel to Plan 9 from Outer Space, filmed by Uwe Boll, with the screenplay by Tommy Wiseau and with him in the lead role." Rossiyskaya Gazeta commented that the film was "Worse than you can imagine." Meduza compared the film's director, Sarik Andreasyan, to Plan 9 from Outer Space's director, Ed Wood, and said that Guardians "is a convincing answer to the eternal question of why we can never catch up with Hollywood even in our own box office". Afisha said that it was the Russian answer to Howard the Duck, and Ivi, Inc. commented that "a more talentless film is hard to imagine". RIA Novosti placed it at the top of their worst film list and Russian review aggregator Kritikanstvo listed it among the all-time lowest-scoring films. Critics outside of Russia generally panned the film but were not as harsh, as it has a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 12 reviews. A sequel was planned, but the film was a box-office bomb, which resulted in the film's production company, Enjoy Movies, subsequently filing for bankruptcy, and the Cinema Foundation of Russia, which provided part of the budget, suing the company and demanding a return of the investment.
Loqueesha (2019)
Main article: LoqueeshaThe 2019 comedy film Loqueesha stars Jeremy Saville, who also independently wrote, directed, and produced the film, as Joe, who needs money to pay for his son's private school education and, after getting rejected for a job as a radio host, the listing for which encourages women and minorities to apply, gets the job by pretending to be a sassy black woman named Loqueesha who gives out advice on air. The film's trailer and poster were panned online as racist and stereotypical upon their release, with Entertainment.ie's Brian Lloyd writing that it was "one the worst fucking things we have ever seen, and we still can't believe it's actually real". Upon seeing the actual film, Nathan Rabin said that the film was "somehow much worse" than the trailer led people to believe.
The film received universally negative reception from critics, as it garnered a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Joel Golby of The Guardian called the plot "one of the more offensive in history", also criticizing its lighting, sound design, and acting, among other aspects of the film, and writing, "The worst film ever made. Worse than The Room, in every way. The one-star rating it currently has on IMDb is actively generous. I cannot believe this film got made." Dan Kahan of Popdust called it "genuinely the worst movie ever watched", calling Saville an "unbelievable racist" and deeming the movie "grotesque", "abhorrent", and "criminal". For Decider, Kay-B wrote that she "wouldn't recommend this film to anyone, living or dead" as it was "painfully hard to watch" while also dubbing it "the year's most reviled movie".
Cats (2019)
Main article: Cats (2019 film)Cats is a film adaptation of the popular musical penned by Andrew Lloyd Webber (based on the works of T. S. Eliot) and directed by Academy Award-winning filmmaker Tom Hooper (The King's Speech). The film is about a tribe of cats called the Jellicles as they hold their Jellicle Ball, an annual ceremony where the cats compete for the chance to enter the Heaviside Layer, where the chosen Jellicle will be granted a new life as a god.
Lloyd Webber condemned the film as "ridiculous" stating, "The problem with the film was that Tom Hooper decided that he didn't want anybody involved in it who was involved in the original show." It was criticized for CGI "digital fur technology", which depicted the film's actors as bipedal cats. An updated version of the film, with a refined CGI patch, was sent to theaters after its premiere. Describing the experimentation with digital fur as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone wrote: "There are many, many other problems with Cats, ... but it was hard for anyone to focus on any of them when it just looked so shitty and disturbing." Other critics also panned the performances of some of the actors, with James Corden and Rebel Wilson (who parodied themselves at the 92nd Academy Awards) receiving the most criticism. As of June 2024, Cats sits at a 19% on Rotten Tomatoes. The film won six awards out of nine nominations at the 40th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Director for Hooper, Worst Supporting Actress for Wilson, Worst Supporting Actor for Corden, and Worst Picture overall.
Early reviews for Cats were embargoed. Manohla Dargis from The New York Times commented that " doctoral thesis could be written about how this misfire sputtered into existence". British newspaper The Daily Telegraph called the film an "all-time disaster" with reviewer Tim Robey giving the film "zero stars" in his review. Critics from The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and The Detroit News wrote that it was a candidate for the worst film of the 2010s, with The Detroit News reviewer Adam Graham writing: "Cats is the biggest disaster of the decade, and possibly thus far in the millennium. It's Battlefield Earth with whiskers." Graham later selected Cats as the worst movie he had ever seen. Wade Major of CineGods.com slammed it as "Showgirls with fur", while Battlefield Earth screenwriter J. David Shapiro (who previously won the Razzie for Worst Screenplay) said Cats had usurped his film as the worst ever made. Cats was included on Time Out's 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.
2020s
365 Days (2020)
Main article: 365 Days (2020 film)365 Days (Polish: 365 Dni) is a 2020 Polish erotic romantic drama film directed by Barbara Białowąs and Tomasz Mandes. It is based on the first novel of a trilogy by Blanka Lipińska. The plot follows a young woman from Warsaw in a spiritless relationship falling for a dominant Sicilian man, who imprisons and imposes on her a period of 365 days for which to fall in love with him. It stars Michele Morrone as Don Massimo Torricelli and Anna-Maria Sieklucka as Laura Biel. The film was released theatrically in Poland on February 7, 2020, and was later made available on Netflix on June 7, 2020, where, despite extremely negative critical response, it became one of the most-watched films, for a time being the fourth-most-watched media on Netflix UK and the third-most-watched media on Netflix US, and gained global attention. It was also a box-office success at Polish cinemas, grossing an estimated $8,964,000. The film received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics, who heavily criticized its softcore themes, sexual violence and Mafia glorification. Rotten Tomatoes collected 16 reviews and identified 0% of them as positive, with an average rating of 1.9/10. Polish English-language news website The First News says that it has been dubbed one of the worst films ever. Taylor Andrews of Cosmopolitan called it the worst thing he had ever seen. Kevin Maher of The Times said "There haven't been line readings this poor since the third act of The Room" and "It makes the bonking puppets in Team America: World Police look like straight-faced documentary". Maddy Mussen of The Tab called it "the worst thing Netflix has ever produced" and said "If you have watched 365 Days on Netflix, there will not be a doubt in your mind that it's the worst thing you've ever seen." Jessica Kiang of Variety called it "a thoroughly terrible, politically objectionable, occasionally hilarious Polish humpathon".
In March 2021, the film was nominated for six Golden Raspberry Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (Michele Morrone), Worst Actress (Anna-Maria Sieklucka), Worst Screenplay and Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel, becoming the second foreign-language film to be nominated for Worst Picture after Italy's Pinocchio (2002; albeit the dubbed version), and won only one in the Screenplay category.
Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey (2023)
Main article: Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and HoneyWinnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey is a 2023 low-budget British horror film which reimagines the characters of the series of children's books by A.A. Milne as mutant slasher villains, released after Milne's work entered the public domain a year prior. It was widely criticized for its premise, alongside lack of humor, poor acting, low grade special effects, incoherent screenplay, poorly lit scenes and dearth of interesting characters. Nathan Rabin stated that the film was "the regrettable product of a loophole in copyright law that allowed these vultures to twist and distort and corrupt A.A. Milne's beloved icons of gentleness and childhood innocence to their own mercenary ends." Rabin issued his first zero star review for the film, in which he referenced Roger Ebert's 1994 review of North by stating: "I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey." With a score of 3%, it appears on Rotten Tomatoes' 100 Worst Movies of All Time list. Screen Rant later placed it at the top of their 10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have to See to Know They're Bad list.
Shawn Paul Wood of The Cinema Spot wrote, "As anyone can tell, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey is one of the worst movies ever made. And, by the looks of its dazzling lack of antipathy for protecting its copyright, Disney knew it." Matt Villei of Collider wrote, "If these reviews are anything to go by, the film might find itself in a spot of bother as it is being called one of the worst horror movies ever, though some predicted that, from its low quality, the film could garner a cult following similar to Tommy Wiseau's disasterpiece, The Room." It received all five Razzies that it was nominated for at the 44th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture, Screenplay and Director (Rhys Frake-Waterfield).
Jim Cummings, the current voice actor for Pooh and Tigger, has also openly bashed the movie in an interview, calling it "absolutely disgusting", as well as threatening the film makers with legal action if they dared to use or imitate his voice for their version of the title character.
See also
- List of films voted the best
- List of biggest box-office bombs
- Low culture
- List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes
- Z movie
- Cinephilia
References
- ^ Lincoln, Kevin (July 2, 2014). "The Benefits of Being the Worst Movie Ever Made". Pacific Standard. Archived from the original on October 23, 2017. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
- Peary, Danny (2014). Cult Midnight Movies: Discover the 37 Best Weird, Sleazy, Sexy, and Crazy Good Cinema Classics. Workman Publishing Company. ISBN 9780761181699. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
- Anders, Charlie Jane (February 26, 2009). "Did The Worst Movie Of All Time Come Out 75 Years Ago?". io9. Archived from the original on February 18, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- ^ Adams, Michael (January 30, 2010). "25 Movies So Bad They're Unmissable". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
- ^ Pellegrini, Francesca (February 25, 2018). "I 20 film più brutti di sempre". Vanity Fair (in Italian). Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- ^ Maltin, Leonard (2003). Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2004. Signet. ISBN 0-451-20940-0.
- McKee, David (September 24, 2009). "What's the Worst Movie Ever?". Las Vegas CityLife. Archived from the original on September 3, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- Lennon, Troy (December 7, 2017). "When Hollywood's worst films become cult classics". News.com.au. Archived from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- St-Amand, Vanessa (March 29, 2022). "Ranked: The best worst movies you need to watch". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on June 19, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Jordan, Danté (January 27, 2020). "We watched 'Reefer Madness' to confirm it's still complete garbage". Leafly. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- ^ "The Terror of Tiny Town (DVD)". Film Threat. June 17, 2005. Archived from the original on March 24, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- "The Terror of Tiny Town (1938)". Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on June 14, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
- ^ Bailey, Jason (September 17, 2014). "The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made". Flavorwire. Archived from the original on March 30, 2019.
- Defleur, Melvin (1998). Understanding Mass Communication: A Liberal Arts Perspective (6 ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 160.
- Richard, Gabriel (June 5, 2019). "20 Best Worst Movies Of All Time". Cultured Vultures. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- ^ Terry, Clifford (June 20, 1989). "A 'Terror' Kicks Off World's Worst Film Festival". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on May 7, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- Del Ruth, Roy; Considine, Bob; Callahan, George; Bendix, William; Trevor, Claire; Bickford, Charles; Frawley, William; Levene, Sam; Allied Artists Productions (2010), The Babe Ruth story, Warner Home Video, OCLC 694103117
- Erickson, Hal (2013). "The Babe Ruth Story (1948)". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ Mincher, Chris; Bahn, Christopher; Modell, Josh; Gillette, Amelie; Tobias, Scott; Murray, Noel; Pierce, Leonard (October 6, 2008). "The home run that cured cancer: 16 Amazing Movie Sports Feats". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- Shaughnessy, Dan (April 3, 1986). "Duke as Williams? A Prince of an Idea". Spokane Chronicle. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- Heller, Dick (July 23, 2000). "Clinic and reception in the works to honor NBA pioneer Lloyd". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- Apple, Charles (September 22, 2020). "Some of the worst movies of all-time". The Spokesman-Review. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Newberry, Paul (August 10, 2019). "Counting down baseball's worst movie locales". The Providence Journal. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Dunne, Michael (October 1996). "Post-War Cultural Construction in "The Babe Ruth Story"". Studies in Popular Culture. 19 (1). Popular Culture Association in the South: 1–7. JSTOR 23413739. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Isaacs, Stan (February 26, 1989). "Out ofLeft Field – The 10 Worst Sports Movies Of All Time". Newsday. ProQuest 278087041. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- "Worst Movie Biopics: Real-Life Catastrophes". Moviefone. November 5, 2009. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- Marshall, Kevin (August 16, 2013). "Blockbuster Hollywood Bios: The Good, the Bad, and the "Jobs"". Spike. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ Goodwin, Cliff (2011). Sid James: A Biography. Random House. pp. 67–68. ISBN 978-0-7535-4682-6.
- ^ McFarlane, Brian (1999). "Outrage: No Orchids for Miss Blandish". In Chibnall, Steve; Murphy, Robert (eds.). British Crime Cinema. Routledge. pp. 37–50. ISBN 0-415-16870-8.
- ^ Halliwell's Film Guide. HarperPerennial. 1994. p. 781. ISBN 978-0-06-273318-4.
- "Question of Propriety for the Censor". The Age. Melbourne. November 27, 1948. p. 9. Retrieved December 13, 2024 – via Trove.
- Maltin, Leonard (2011). Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide: From The Silent Era Through 1965 (Second ed.). Penguin. p. 474. ISBN 978-0-452-29577-3.
- Allen, Julien (September 7, 2011). "Simply the Worst: Edward D. Wood Jr.'s 'Glen or Glenda?'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Richard Barrios, Screened Out: Playing Gay in Hollywood from Edison to Stonewall, Psychology Press, 2003, ISBN 0-415-92328-X, Page 235.
- ^ Cerabona, Ron (October 30, 2012). "So bad it's good: retro sci-fi's monster appeal". The Newcastle Herald. Archived from the original on July 22, 2022. Retrieved July 22, 2022.
- ^ Book of Lists, p. 208.
- Sauter, p. 326.
- King, Stephen (1981). Danse Macabre. New York: Everest House. ISBN 978-0-89696-076-3.
- Barsanti, Chris (2014). The Sci-Fi Movie Guide: The Universe of Film from Alien to Zardoz. Visible Ink Press. p. 312. ISBN 978-1578595334.
- ^ Walters, Jack (July 26, 2023). "10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have To See To Know They're Bad". Screen Rant. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
- Adams, Cecil (October 26, 1984). "Did John Wayne die of cancer caused by a radioactive movie set?". The Straight Dope. Archived from the original on July 3, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ Bell, Chris (January 17, 2017). "The movie so toxic it killed John Wayne: the tragedy of The Conqueror". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 23, 2022.
- ^ von Tunzelmann, Alex (May 3, 2013). "The Conqueror: Hollywood gives Genghis Khan a kicking he won't forget". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on June 23, 2013. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
- Sauter, p. 68–71.
- Grewal, Joti (September 27, 2021). "Former Aldergrove Star editor releases book, soon-to-be documentary about 'worst movie ever made'". Aldergrove Star. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- Barone, Matt (November 12, 2012). "The 10 Worst Biopic Movies Of All Time". Complex. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved July 7, 2017.
- ^ Greene, Andy (September 25, 2023). "The 50 Worst Decisions in Movie History". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
- "BBC On This Day | 5 | 1976: Billionaire Howard Hughes dies". BBC News. April 7, 1976. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Rubin, Nathan (2010). My Year of Flops. Scribner. ISBN 978-1-4391-5312-3.
- "Fire Maidens of Outer Space". dvddrive-in.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2021. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
- ^ "Fire Maidens Of Outer Space". DVD Talk. August 13, 2013. Archived from the original on August 12, 2020. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
- John Walker (ed.) Halliwell's Film and Video Guide 2000, London and New York; HarperCollins, 1999, ISBN 0-06-273645-0 (p.287).
- ^ I. Q Hunter, "From Window Cleaner to Potato Man" in British Comedy Cinema, edited by I.Q. Hunter and Laraine Porter. Routledge, 2012. ISBN 0-415-66667-8. (p.154)
- Welsh, Paul (November 28, 2021). "The worst film ever made?". Borehamwood & Elstree Times. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Robb, David L. (2004). Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. p. 321. ISBN 9781591021827. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (September 16, 2020). "Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #126 Plan 9 From Outer Space (1957)". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Liebenson, Donald (May 7, 2021). "Plan 9 from Outer Space Lands in TCM Classic Film Festival". Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Barnett, David (March 31, 2017). "In defence of the so-called Worst Movie Ever Made". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 3, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
- Levy, Emanuel (February 1, 2021). "Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959)". emanuellevy.com. Archived from the original on July 11, 2022. Retrieved July 11, 2022.
- ^ Barber, Nicholas (January 10, 2022). "Is this the worst film ever made?". BBC. Archived from the original on July 20, 2022. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- Radio Times Guide to Films 2014. Radio Times, London, 2013. ISBN 0-9567523-6-5 (p.947).
- ^ Kenny, Glenn. "Dirty Grandpa Movie Review & Film Summary (2016)". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
- ^ Bibbiani, William (December 27, 2021). "The Best Worst Movies Ever Made: The Room, Super Mario Bros. and More". IGN. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- "Plan 9 From Outer Space". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on November 14, 2016. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- ^ "Plan 9 from Outer Space – Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- Schwartz, Carol (1995). Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics. Visible Ink Press. ISBN 978-0-7876-0616-9.
- "Schlock Value: The Creeping Terror (1964)". Talk Film Society. September 11, 2017. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- Medved, Harry and Michael (1986). Son of Golden Turkey Awards. New York: Random House/Villard Books. ISBN 0-394-74341-5. p. 197.
- Alexander, Chris (September 12, 2017). "Creep Behind the Camera Blu-ray Review". ComingSoon.net. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- ^ "Fantasia 2014: The Creep Behind the Camera was scarier than the carpet monster from outer space". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- "Synapse Films Getting Creepy This September with Dario Argento's Creepers, The Creep Behind the Camera, and The Creeping Terror Blu-rays". Dread Central. June 21, 2017. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- Golden Turkey Awards, pp. 18.
- ^ "66 Worst Movies Of All Time". Total Film. GamesRadar. February 15, 2012. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- "The Creeping Terror (Dangerous Charter) (The Crawling Monster)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on October 14, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- "RiffTrax: A Guide to Christmas and Holiday Episodes". Den of Geek. December 18, 2020. Archived from the original on July 18, 2021. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
- "SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS (Nicholas Webster, 1964)". December 1, 2011. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved May 10, 2020 – via Vimeo.
- "Film Threat – The Bootleg Files: "Santa Claus Conquers The Martians"". Filmthreat.com. Archived from the original on November 30, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
- Cramp, Nick (December 11, 2020). "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)". BBC. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
- "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Santa Claus Conquers the Martians". TV.com. Archived from the original on August 22, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- "Cinematic Titanic | The Store". Cinematictitanic.twinvision.com. October 11, 2012. Archived from the original on October 15, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- "Shout! Factory Store". Shout! Factory. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved October 1, 2023.
- Bangs, Lester (1987). "The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, or, The Day The Airwaves Erupted". In Marcus, Greil (ed.). Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung. New York: Random House. p. 122. ISBN 0-394-53896-X.
- Grobaty, Tim (2012). Location Filming in Long Beach. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-1614237754. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
- ^ Singer, Matthew; McGeady, Sean (September 7, 2022). "The 40 best bad movies ever made". Time Out. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- "Recap: Monster A-Go Go (1965)". The Agony Booth. June 16, 2003. Archived from the original on October 23, 2006. Retrieved January 21, 2007.
- Beldin, Fred. "Monster A Go-Go!". Allmovie.com. Archived from the original on August 2, 2012. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- Voger, Mark (October 26, 2010). "'Monster A-Go Go': A cult favorite guaranteed to make you cringe". NJ.com. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
- "Monster A-Go-Go - Movie Reviews | Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
- ^ Orange, B. Alan (October 25, 2010). "Bill Rebane Looks Back at Monster a Go-Go! [Exclusive]". MovieWeb. Retrieved December 2, 2024.
- "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go". Castle Forrester. Archived from the original on November 20, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- "Hi-keeba!'s MST3K Episode Guide". Angelfire.com. March 1, 2001. Archived from the original on August 20, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- The Joy of Trash: Nathan Rabin's Happy Place's Definitive Guide to the Very Wortst of Everything. Independently published. December 16, 2021. p. 154. ISBN 979-8-7859-1421-6. Archived from the original on December 29, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- "Exploiting our Archives: Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #69 Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. May 13, 2023. Archived from the original on December 29, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Ross, Dalton (June 6, 2005). "The Worst Movie Ever Made". Entertainment Weekly. p. 2. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- ^ Adams, pp. 91–2.
- ^ Fashingbauer Cooper, Gael (August 13, 2012). "Torgo lives! 'Mystery Science' alums revisit worst movie ever, 'Manos: The Hands of Fate'". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013. Retrieved March 4, 2013.
- Pierce, Betty (November 11, 1966). "Hero Massaged to Death in 'Manos-- The Hands of Fate'". El Paso Herald-Post. Archived from the original on December 17, 2005. Retrieved March 1, 2013.
- "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Manos: The Hands of Fate". TV.com. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- Manos – the Hands of Fate at Rotten Tomatoes
- Brandt, Richard (May 1996). "The Hand That Time Forgot". Mimosa. pp. 35–38. Archived from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2006.
- Heller, Chris (December 12, 2011). "'Manos: The Hands Of Fate': Carefully Restoring The Opposite Of A Masterpiece". NPR. Archived from the original on May 29, 2020. Retrieved March 16, 2020.
- "Read this: The battle over the infamous cult classic Manos: The Hands of Fate". The A.V. Club. September 25, 2015. Archived from the original on August 15, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- "Manos: The Hands of Fate [Special Edition] [Blu-ray] – Synapse Films". October 13, 2015. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (December 16, 1969). "A Place for Lovers". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved October 19, 2013.
- Champlin, Charles (December 18, 1969). "A Place For Lovers Film 'Worst' One Critic's Seen". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on July 9, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- "They Saved Hitler's Brain (1964)". TCM.com. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2020.
- ^ "They Saved Hitler's Brain". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. Retrieved March 26, 2020.
- Peary, Danny (1986). Guide for the Film Fanatic. Simon & Schuster. p. 430. ISBN 0671610813.
- ^ Slide, Anthony (2018). Magnificent Obsession: The Outrageous History of Film Buffs, Collectors, Scholars, and Fanatics. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1496810533. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
- "Myra Breckinridge". Variety. January 1, 1970. Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- "Cinema:Some Sort of Nadir". Time. July 6, 1970. Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- Kelly, Herb (August 29, 1970). "'Breckinridge' Worst Ever". The Miami News. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2013.
- Hoberman, J.; Rosenbaum, Jonathan (1991). Midnight Movies. Da Capo Press. p. 268. ISBN 0-306-80433-6.
- Conner, Floyd (2002). Hollywood's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Lucky Breaks, Prima Donnas, Box Office Bombs, and Other Oddities. Brassey's. p. 65. ISBN 1-57488-480-8.
- "One and Done: 8 Filmmakers Who Have Only Directed a Single Movie – Collider on msn.com". MSN. Archived from the original on July 30, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- "Locally made sci-fi thriller is all 'Zaat' and then some". June 12, 2001. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Kauffman, Jeffrey (February 21, 2012). "Zaat Blu Ray". Archived from the original on July 11, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Naugle, Patrick (February 12, 2012). "DVD Verdict Review – Zaat (Blu Ray)". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on October 2, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Rubino, Michael (February 22, 2010). "DVD Verdict Review – Mystery Science Theater 3000". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on February 25, 2010. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Weeks, Linton (February 24, 2009). "10 Reasons Why We Love Making Lists". NPR. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Sampo (May 20, 2010). "Season 10 Episode Guide!". MST3Kinfo. Archived from the original on December 18, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "Half in the Bag:Zaat!". RedLetterMedia. April 30, 2012. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- Cork International Film Festival (October 10, 2013). "An American Hippie in Isreal". Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2020 – via Vimeo.
- Shefler, Gil (January 26, 2011). "Finding New Life As a Cult Classic". The Jewish Daily Forward. Archived from the original on October 18, 2015. Retrieved August 14, 2013.
- Olson, Josh (December 9, 2013). "Trailers from Hell: Josh Olson on Little Known Comedy 'An American Hippie in Israel'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- Harman, Ben (January 9, 2011). "'Horrendous' Israeli '70s film becomes a cult favorite". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on August 30, 2018. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- "News article from Nana 10" (in Hebrew). Archived from the original on August 8, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2013.
- Merz, Theo (February 23, 2015). "The rise of parody porn, 'the Chaucer of our times'". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022.
- Anders, Charlie Jane (May 30, 2012). "The Bizarre History of Superhero Porn [NSFW]". io9. Archived from the original on March 27, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- Lamar, Cyriaque (May 22, 2010). "A brief history of Batman-themed pornography (NSFW)". io9. Archived from the original on March 7, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- "Bat Pussy – the first superhero porn parody?". PornParody.com. October 6, 2014. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014.
- Allison, Matthew. "Deep Inside Bat Pussy". AV Maniacs. Archived from the original on October 26, 2015. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
- Pearson, Rebecca; Brooker, Will; Uriccho, William (2015). The Many More Lives of Batman. British Film Institute. ISBN 978-1844577644. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "The Bootleg Files: At Long Last Love". Film Threat. May 5, 2006. Archived from the original on July 19, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
- "Peter Bogdanovich: a life in pictures". The Guardian. January 6, 2022. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- Brody, Richard (January 7, 2022). "How Peter Bogdanovich Shaped the Backstory of Modern Cinema". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on May 30, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- Tookey, Christopher (2010). Named and Shamed: The World's Worst and Wittiest Movie Reviews from Affleck to Zeta-Jones. Troubador Publishing. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-84876-560-3.
- Yule, Andrew (1992). Picture shows: the life and films of Peter Bogdanovich. Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 90. ISBN 0-87910-153-9.
- Simon, Jeff (May 24, 1996). "Wisecrack Addicts Laughing at the Not-So-Bad". The Buffalo News. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
- ^ Muir, John Kenneth (2005). Singing a new tune:the rebirth of the modern film musical, from Evita to De-lovely and beyond. Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 58. ISBN 1-55783-610-8.
- ^ Leopold, Todd (July 11, 2013). "Picking up the pieces on Hollywood's biggest bombs". CNN. Archived from the original on August 18, 2013. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
- Keyser, Lester J. (1981). Hollywood in the Seventies. Los Angeles, California: A.S. Barnes. p. 85. ISBN 0498025454.
- Medved 1978, p. 37.
- Medved, Michael (1980). The Golden Turkey Awards. G. P. Putnam's Sons. p. 209. ISBN 0-399-50463-X.
- McWeeny, Drew (January 9, 2012). "Peter Bogdanovich screens new cut of At Long Last Love and tells story behind it". Hitfix. Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ Fordy, Tom (October 3, 2023). "'The worst film ever made'? Why Exorcist II: The Heretic is truly the sequel from hell". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on October 28, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2023.
- ^ "'If I'd made that, I'd change my name'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- "Exorcist II – The Heretic Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- "The 25 worst sequels of all time". The A.V. Club. September 8, 2023. Archived from the original on October 28, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2023.
- Libbey, Dirk (January 9, 2019). "Original Exorcist Director Says The Sequel Was The Worst Movie He's Ever Seen". CinemaBlend. Archived from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- Kaye, Don (April 15, 2013). "Exorcist director says sequel is 'one of the worst films I've ever seen'". Blastr. Archived from the original on August 4, 2013. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- McCabe, Bob (1999). The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows. Omnibus Press. p. 164. ISBN 9780711975095.
- Kurland, Daniel (August 16, 2019). "Nearly 30 Years Later, Masterpiece 'The Exorcist III' is Finally Getting Its Due". Bloody Disgusting.
- ^ Halliwell's film and video guide 2002 edited by John Walker. London. HarperCollins Entertainment, 2001. ISBN 0-00-712265-9 (p. 804).
- "The worst movie ever?". The Guardian. April 26, 2001. Archived from the original on November 11, 2013. Retrieved March 29, 2014.
- "The Swarm". September 10, 2012. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved March 29, 2014.
- Mikel J. Koven, Film, Folklore and Urban Legends. Scarecrow Press, 2008 ISBN 0-8108-6025-2 (p. 91)
- Wilson, John (2005). The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 0-446-69334-0.
- Squires, John (August 22, 2018). "Warner Archive Releasing Extended Version of 1978's 'The Swarm' on Blu-ray". Archived from the original on January 12, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- "On This Day in Horror History: The Mind Boggling 'The Swarm' Hit Theaters". July 14, 2017. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- Floorwalker, Mike (June 7, 2018). "Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Takedowns Of All Time". Grunge.com. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2022.
- ^ "I Spit on Your Grave (Day of the Woman)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 14, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- Livingston, James (2011). The World Turned Inside Out: American Thought and Culture at the End of the 20th Century. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 189. ISBN 978-0742535428. Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
- Tobias, Scott (March 21, 2011). "I Spit On Your Grave (2010)". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- Naugle, Patrick (February 15, 2002). "Don't Mess With My Sister". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on April 26, 2004.
- Ebert, Roger (July 16, 1980). "Review of I Spit on Your Grave". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 24, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Lord, Steve (November 7, 2010). "Movie, journalism fans queue up to see Ebert". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2010. Retrieved March 20, 2007.
- Ebert, Roger (May 28, 1998). "Video Q&A". The Ledger. Archived from the original on February 13, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2013.
- Siskel, Gene (August 17, 1983). "'Man Who Wasn't There' would best be left unseen". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on January 3, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- Croatto, Pete (May 1, 2013). "Worst Movie Ever? I Spit On Your Grave". Film Racket. Archived from the original on September 11, 2015. Retrieved July 31, 2015.
- Shaffer, R. L. (February 4, 2011). "I Spit on Your Grave (1978) Blu-Ray Review". IGN. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- "The Worst Movies of 1980 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
- ^ "Show Business: Will the Real Caligula Stand Up?". Time. January 3, 1977. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (September 22, 1980). "Caligula movie review & film summary (1980)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2020. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Ebert, Roger (October 16, 2008). "Don't read me first!". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2008. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (August 11, 2005). "Ebert's Most Hated". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- Sauter, p. 266.
- "News Diary". The Age. June 8, 1981. p. 2.
- "Lowest: 100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment". The Hamilton Spectator. July 24, 1999. p. W17.
- Holleman, Joe (May 5, 2000). "Roman Warriors roam the big screen again". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. p. E1.
- Armstead, Christopher. "Caligula". Film Critics United. Archived from the original on January 10, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
- Bell, Sean (December 1, 2011). "'Caligula's Ghost: Why Cinema Needs Epic Failure More than Mediocre Success, PopMatters". PopMatters. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- ^ Vincentelli, Elisabeth (August 15, 2024). "'Caligula: The Ultimate Cut' Review: The Emperor's New Clothes". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
Even more crucial is the belief that a masterpiece lurks within the mangled original release. Now attempting to prove that theory is "Caligula: The Ultimate Cut," the latest iteration of a film that has gone through an unfathomable number of edits over the decades. This is the rare re-edited version of a movie that features less graphic sex and violence than the original. What kind of world are we living in?
- Pelley, Rich (August 1, 2024). "Malcolm McDowell: 'Kubrick had stewed pears and sour chicken for lunch because Napoleon did'". the Guardian. London. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
- "Caligula: The Ultimate Cut". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
- Bukszpan, Daniel (March 20, 2012). "The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs -> 8. Heaven's Gate (1980)". CNBC. Archived from the original on June 10, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Corry, John (March 24, 1986). "'Cruel, Camera,' About Animal Abuse". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1981). "Heaven's Gate movie review & film summary (1981)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 17, 2019. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Bach, Steven (1999). Final Cut: Art, Money, and Ego in the Making of Heaven's Gate, the Film that Sank United Artists. Newmarket Press. p. 6. ISBN 9781557043740.
heaven's gate april 16 1979.
- "Summary of 1981 Razzies". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- ^ August, Melissa; Barovick, Harriet; Derrow, Michelle; Gray, Tam; Levy, Daniel S.; Lofaro, Lina; Spitz, David; Stein, Joel; Taylor, Chris (June 14, 1999). "The 100 Worst Ideas Of The Century". Time. Archived from the original on October 21, 2018. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
- ^ Queenan, Joe (March 21, 2008). "Joe Queenan on the worst movie of all time". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- ^ "The 50 Worst Movies Ever". Empire. February 4, 2010. Archived from the original on February 1, 2020. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
- Brody, Richard (November 25, 2015). "Movie of the Week: "Heaven's Gate"". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Holmes, Linda (October 19, 2010). "'My Year Of Flops': A Very Good Book About Some Very Bad Movies". NPR. Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
- ^ "The Criterion Channel's March 2024 Lineup". The Criterion Channel. February 14, 2024. Archived from the original on March 1, 2024. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
- Hoyle, Ben (October 1, 2012). "Heaven's Gate: box office turkey that sank a studio is a modern masterpiece". The Times. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- "Heaven's Gate". The Criterion Collection. Archived from the original on November 16, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
- Dargis, Manohla (March 15, 2013). "The Second Coming of 'Heaven's Gate'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 25, 2013. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- "Les 100 meilleurs films de l'histoire selon "Télérama"". Télérama. August 16, 2023. Retrieved November 12, 2023.
- "Revisiting 1980, The Year the Movies Killed Disco". InsideHook. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
- ^ Bailey, Jason (July 10, 2017). "Bad Movie Night: The Distinctive Disco Cheese of 'The Apple'". Flavorwire. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
- ^ "The Apple". American Film Institute. Archived from the original on July 10, 2017. Retrieved January 31, 2016.
- ^ Harris, Blake (February 5, 2016). "The Apple Oral History: How Did This Get Made". /Film. Archived from the original on January 12, 2022. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
- "Past Winners Database". Los Angeles Times. August 15, 2007. Archived from the original on August 15, 2007.
- ^ "Q & A with the Stinkers". Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. Archived from the original on April 13, 2001. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- Brownfield, Troy (August 7, 2020). "The Worst Movie Musicals Ever". The Saturday Evening Post. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- "The Apple (1980)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
- Burns, Sean (July 12, 2006). "Summer Camp". Philadelphia Weekly.
- Lowe, Kenneth; Vorel, Jim (February 19, 2020). "Bad Movie Diaries: The Apple (1980)". Paste. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ "10 Really Bad Movies that Define "Bad Movies"". Mental Floss. September 6, 2012. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- "Inchon". tcm.com. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- "Slate's Bad Movies: Oscar Slumming". March 3, 2008. Archived from the original on March 12, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2019 – via YouTube.
- s:U.S. v. Sun Myung Moon 532 F.Supp. 1360 (1982)
- Canby, Vincent (September 17, 1982). "Inchon (1981) – 'Inchon,' At Last". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2012. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- "Terence Young dies – Directed Bond movies". The Washington Post. September 9, 1994. p. B6.
- "1982 Razzie Nominees & "Winners" – The Official Razzie Forum". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- Mayo, Mike (April 13, 1997). "Hollywood's untapped resources – worthwhile movies don't always make it to video". The Washington Post. p. G7.
- Boedeker, Hal (July 21, 1989). "The Magic of Olivier his film legacy sets standard for all actors". The Miami Herald. p. 36G.
The worst of his choices was probably taking on the role of Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1982's Inchon. Newsweek called Inchon 'the worst movie ever made, a turkey the size of Godzilla.'
- "Inchon Review". TV Guide. November 28, 2012. Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- McKay, John (Canadian Press) (March 23, 2004). "Welch fleshes out worst in film". The Record (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada). p. E4.
- Medved, Harry; Medved, Michael (1984). The Hollywood Hall of Shame: The Most Expensive Flops in Movie History. New York, NY: Perigee Books. pp. 189–197. ISBN 0-399-51060-5.
- Sauter, p. 197.
- Leslie Halliwell, John Walker, Halliwell's Film Guide. HarperPerennial, 1996 (p. 1119).
- Thomas S. Hischak, American Literature on Stage and Screen: 525 Works and Their Adaptations McFarland, 2012. ISBN 0-7864-9279-1 (p. 237)
- "John Derek, Tarzan the Ape Man". Old School Reviews. Archived from the original on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- Brunson, Matt (June 16, 2004). "View From The Couch | View from the Couch | Creative Loafing Charlotte". Clclt.com. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- "Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on March 7, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
- Shapiro, Gregg (October 14, 2021). "Camp classic 'Mommie Dearest' turns 40". Archived from the original on October 22, 2021. Retrieved October 22, 2021.
- "How 'Mommie Dearest' Went From Oscar Bait to Cult Classic|Collider". Collider. March 10, 2023. Archived from the original on July 22, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2023.
- "Meine liebe Rabenmutter". Archived from the original on January 29, 2019. Retrieved January 28, 2019 – via mubi.com.
- "'Mommie Dearest' meets John Waters". Chicago Tribune. June 6, 2006. Archived from the original on July 31, 2021. Retrieved June 5, 2021.
- "AFI|Catalog". catalog.afi.com. Archived from the original on June 5, 2021. Retrieved June 5, 2021.
- Adams, p. 188.
- Wilson, John (March 15, 1990). "Decade's Worst -The 80's". Golden Raspberry Awards. Archived from the original on May 11, 2013.
- "Razzies still knocking Hollywood down a peg after 25 years". Associated Press / USA Today. February 24, 2005. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Wilson, John (2005). The official Razzie movie guide: enjoying the best of Hollywood's worst. Hachette. ISBN 0-446-69334-0.
- Sauter, p. 189.
- Crouse, Richard (2005). Reel Winners: Movie Award Trivia. Dundurn Group. p. 123. ISBN 1-55002-574-0.
- Henderson, Eric (June 21, 2010). "Movie Blog: Best 'Worst Movies Ever'". CBS Minneapolis. Archived from the original on October 4, 2015. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1981). "Mommie Dearest movie review & film summary (1981)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2017. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- "Mommie Dearest Review – Read Variety's Analysis Of The Movie Mommie Dearest". Variety. January 1, 1981. Archived from the original on July 15, 2014.
- Brody, Richard (May 26, 2017). "Joan Crawford's Explosive Offscreen Life". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- "Mommie Dearest (1981)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
- "There Is No Try...: Foleyvision does the Turkish 'Star Wars' Austin Screens". AustinChronicle.com. February 20, 2004. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- "The Turkish Star Wars". Film Threat. May 18, 2005. Archived from the original on March 12, 2010. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- Goldweber, David Elroy (2015). Claws & Saucers: Science Fiction, Horror, and Fantasy Film 1902-1982: A Complete Guide. Lulu Press, Inc. p. 1773. ISBN 978-1-312-28803-4. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Contour2002.org". Archived from the original on August 10, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2014.
- "News article from Sabah newspaper" (in Turkish). Archived from the original on May 30, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- "News article from Hürriyet" (in Turkish). April 7, 2012. Archived from the original on March 2, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- "Dollar-store Star Wars". Toronto Standard. May 4, 2012. Archived from the original on September 26, 2018. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
- "News article from Sabah newspaper" (in Turkish). Archived from the original on August 8, 2009. Retrieved July 29, 2006.
- Weinberg, Marc (1986). "Out-Foxed". Orange Coast Magazine. Vol. 12, no. 9. pp. 143–144.
- Maltin, Leonard (2008). "H". Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide. Penguin Group. p. 641. ISBN 978-0-452-28978-9.
- Stanley, John (2000). Creature Features: The Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide. Berkley Boulevard Books. p. 253. ISBN 0-425-17517-0.
For one, the duck costume and makeup are phony — Howard looks like a midget in a Halloween costume.
- Hunter, Lew (2004). "Nothing in the Mind, Please". Lew Hunter's Screenwriting 434: The Industry's Premier Teacher Reveals the Secrets of the Successful Screenplay. Perigee. p. 21. ISBN 0-399-52986-1.
Because we all know what a duck looks like, Lucas could not get an audience to suspend their belief that Howard was a little person in a duck suit.
- Kehr, Dave (August 1, 1986). "UNLOVABLE DUCK MAKES 'HOWARD' AN UNLOVABLE FILM". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
- Carr, Jay (August 1, 1986). "They Don't Get Much Worse Than 'Howard'". The Boston Globe. ProQuest 294411402. Archived from the original on October 18, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- "Summer of '86: Tarred and Feathered: Howard the Duck". Slant Magazine. July 28, 2011. Archived from the original on March 16, 2014. Retrieved March 14, 2014.
- "Howard the Duck". TV Guide. Archived from the original on September 30, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2014.
- ^ Kendrick, Ben (November 13, 2015). "25 Worst Movies in Film History". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on August 11, 2017. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
- "Howard the Duck (1986)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- Wilson, John. "1986 Archive". Golden Raspberry Award. Archived from the original on June 2, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2009.
- "1986 9th Hastings Bad Cinema Society Stinkers Awards". Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 17, 2006. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
- Thompson, Lea; Jones, Jeffrey; Gale, Ed (2009). Releasing the Duck (DVD). Universal Home Video. UPC 025195052306.
- Chipman, Bob. "Duck Fails Hollywood Bets It All on Duck Boners". Primer&Co. Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
- Alter, Ethan (October 11, 2019). "Role Recall: Tim Robbins on being in the first Marvel movie, where his 'Bull Durham' character is now and the one thing he still has from 'The Shawshank Redemption'". Yahoo. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
- Libbey, Dirk (June 12, 2018). "Lea Thompson Is Pitching A Howard The Duck Movie To Marvel". CINEMABLEND. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- Eisenberg, Eric (August 1, 2014). "Guardians Of The Galaxy End Credits Sequence Explained". CinemaBlend. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- "Seth Green would voice Howard the Duck in the MCU again 'anytime they asked'". SYFY Official Site. July 20, 2020. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Grisar, PJ (November 4, 2019). "Elaine May, Mounting A Comeback At 87, Is Directing A New Film". The Forward. Archived from the original on November 5, 2019. Retrieved April 28, 2020.
- "The Not-So-Savage Messiahs". MUBI. August 5, 2013. Archived from the original on August 17, 2022. Retrieved August 2, 2022.
- ^ Brody, Richard (August 6, 2015). "Movie of the Week: "Ishtar"". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
- "Review: 'Dinner for Schmucks' a savory comedy". San Jose Mercury News. May 1, 2011. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- "Ishtar". Time Out. Archived from the original on November 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
- Morrissey, Ed (February 22, 2009). "What were the worst movies of all time?". Hot Air. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- Sauter, p. 213–216.
- ^ Richard Roeper, 10 Sure Signs a Movie Character is Doomed and Other Surprising Movie Lists, New York: Hyperion Books, 2003, pp. 66–67
- Ryder, Alistair (August 6, 2015). "10 Movies With Low Ratings That Are Actually Good". Film Inquiry. Archived from the original on January 12, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- Brueggemann, Tom (May 17, 2020). "'Ishtar': How Hollywood Decided That One Box-Office Flop Spoke for All Female Directors". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 5, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2022.
- McGuire, Liam (December 1, 2022). "Gary Larson Names the One Far Side Comic He Wants to Apologize For". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on December 9, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2022.
- "Worst of 1987 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- Kempley, Rita (December 19, 1987). "Leonard Part 6 (PG)". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved June 27, 2012.
- Weinberg, Scott (April 26, 2005). "Leonard Part 6". DVD Talk. Archived from the original on November 6, 2012. Retrieved June 27, 2012.
- King, Dennis (July 6, 1990). "Ghost Dad". Tulsa World. Archived from the original on May 7, 2019. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
- Broeske, Pat H. (December 20, 1987). "Leonard RIP?". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2010.
- Feran, Tim (April 26, 1992). "Section: Features – Accent & Arts – Intermission". Columbus Dispatch. Columbus, Ohio. p. 01F.
- "Stars take critics with a grain of salt". The Daily Union. May 12, 1991. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
- Seibold, Witney (January 13, 2023). "The Nukie Controversy Explained: Destroying Crappy Movies For Charity". /Film. Archived from the original on January 14, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.
- Trinos, Angelo Delos (August 15, 2022). "10 Copycat Films That Are Worse Than What They're Ripping Off". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- Phalin, Mike (August 26, 2016). "Schlock and the Snob: An Interview With Brad Jones". Dread Central. Archived from the original on January 1, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- Newgent, Sean (January 10, 2023). "VHS copy of forgotten 'E.T.' knock-off 'Nukie' sells for $80,600". KGUN-TV. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- ^ Winning, Joshua (November 8, 2011). "50 Worst Kids Movies". Total Film. GamesRadar. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- Winning, Joshua (June 30, 2014). "25 Worst Science-Fiction Films". Total Film. GamesRadar. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- Balmont, James (January 30, 2023). "Nukie: the strange story behind the forgotten ET knock-off". Dazed. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- The Garbage Pail Kids Movie at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ "Best Movies of All Time". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- James, Caryn (August 28, 1987). "Movie Review – The Garbage Pail Kids Movie". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved June 6, 2010.
- "Trashy 'Garbage Pail Kids' Has No Value". Sun-Sentinel. September 5, 1987. Archived from the original on January 13, 2012. Retrieved September 29, 2010.
- "Doug Walker on The Garbage Pail Kids Movie". December 16, 2012. Archived from the original on May 17, 2024. Retrieved May 17, 2024 – via YouTube.
- "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie > Overview". AllMovie. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2010.
- "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987) – Box Office Mojo". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on March 23, 2011. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ Bailey, Jason (December 12, 2014). "So Bad It's Good: It's Christmas Time (and Garbage Day) in 'Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2'". Flavorwire. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- ^ Kennedy, Michael (August 3, 2022). "Why Silent Night, Deadly Night 2 Was So Legendarily Bad". Screen Rant. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (November 30, 2023). "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is One of the Craziest, Sleaziest and Most Deranged Pieces of Shit I've Ever Seen. That's Why It's Great and Everyone Should See It". Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- Gunning, Cathal (December 25, 2022). "Every Killer Santa Horror Movie Ranked". Screen Rant. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- Nathan Rabin (November 25, 2023). "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 is the sleaziest, craziest, worst and most ridiculous movie ever made. That's why it's great and every one should see it" (Tweet). Retrieved December 15, 2024 – via Twitter.
- O'Regan, Emmett (December 11, 2022). "Why Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 Is the Worst Movie of All Time". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- ^ Vorel, Jim. "The 20 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time". Paste. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
- Donato, Matt (December 22, 2017). "'Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2' Is The Best Worst Christmas Horror Movie And You Must Watch It". /Film. Retrieved December 15, 2024.
- ^ Embley, Jochan; Fletcher, Harry (April 23, 2020). "Remembering 80s disaster Hobgoblins in all its chaotic glory". The Standard. Retrieved December 8, 2024.
- "Episode Guide". Archived from the original on October 13, 2008.
- Cornelius, David (August 18, 2009). "Mad Monster Rally : DVD Talk Review of the DVD Video". DVD Talk. Archived from the original on February 24, 2014. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- Foywonder (June 23, 2009). "Rick Sloane Talks Hobgoblins". Dread Central. Retrieved December 8, 2024.
- "Hobgoblins 2". Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2020 – via mubi.com.
- "Advertising is so much a part of life that it's understandable to find familiar products in films. But sometimes it goes too far". Los Angeles Times. August 29, 1999. Archived from the original on December 4, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2012.
- Mac and Me at Box Office Mojo
- "Mac and Me". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Archived from the original on April 28, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- ^ Mac and Me at Rotten Tomatoes
- "Movie Review Mac and Me Takes a Big McBite Out of E.T." Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 7, 2011. Retrieved December 5, 2010.
- McGranaghan, Mike (March 21, 2017). "15 Movies With Bizarre Source Material". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 24, 2018. Retrieved June 23, 2018.
- Millican, Josh (August 8, 2018). "Alternate Mac and Me Ending Unearthed and It's Insane". MovieWeb. Archived from the original on September 11, 2018. Retrieved December 15, 2018.
- "Top 20 aliens in the movies". The Telegraph. December 19, 2017. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- Crow, Jonathan (April 22, 2011). "Morgan Spurlock Dubs 'Mac and Me' the Worst Film Ever Sold". Yahoo! Movies. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- "Mac and Me". San Francisco Chronicle. January 22, 2017.
McDonald's created an 'E.T.' rip-off called 'Mac and Me' in 1988... It's the worst movie ever made.
- "Paul Rudd and Chris Evans interviewed by Simon Mayo". BBC Radio 5 Live. April 29, 2016. Event occurs at 10 minutes. Archived from the original on May 10, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
Mac and Me... we're talking about the worst film ever made.
- Lindelof, Damon (March 14, 2011). "Damon Lindelof's Open Letter to Paul the Alien". GQ. Archived from the original on April 28, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- Hayden, Michael (November 10, 2011). "The 6 best bad films". GQ India. Archived from the original on May 12, 2018. Retrieved May 11, 2018.
- Patches, Matt (April 3, 2017). "How McDonald's Bizarre 'E.T.' Knockoff Got Made". Thrillist. Archived from the original on December 11, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
- McNally, Victoria (April 24, 2017). "Mac and Me Finally (?) Gets Figure and Pin Collection". Nerdist. Archived from the original on May 12, 2018. Retrieved May 11, 2018.
- "'Mystery Science Theater 3000' Will Tackle 'Mac And Me' In Season 2". November 12, 2018. Archived from the original on January 3, 2020. Retrieved January 3, 2020.
- Faraci, Derek (June 12, 2022). "10 MST3K Movies You Should Watch Without The Riffing". CBR. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- "Things review". Canuxploitation. Archived from the original on September 29, 2013. Retrieved December 28, 2013.
- "Films on the Fringe: Things (1989)". Critic Online. Archived from the original on April 15, 2009. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
- Symchuk, Adam (September 30, 2020). "It Came From The North: 10 Great Monster Movies From Canada". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on July 26, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- Kirschner, Jeff (December 10, 2015). "Things: The Worst Movie Ever Made". Dread Central. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- Pfeifer, Will (October 17, 2008). "Will Pfeifer: Monsters, mullets meet for snoozefest". Jackson Newspapers. Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- Nelson, Mike J.; Murphy, Kevin; Corbett, Bill (March 4, 2022). "Things". Rifftrax. Archived from the original on March 5, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Griggs, Brandon (March 17, 2007). "Troll 2: As camp as it gets". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved December 30, 2024.
- ^ Berchtold, Trent (September 29, 2024). "The 10 Most Rewatchable Bad Horror Movies, Ranked". Collider. Retrieved December 30, 2024.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (March 29, 2013). "Best Worst Movie uncovers the heartbreaking psychodrama in a memorably insane B-movie". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on May 16, 2014. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
- "The Beauty Of The 'Best Worst Movie'". NPR. Archived from the original on June 20, 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2009.
- "Troll 2 Review". TV Guide. Archived from the original on April 26, 2017. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- Hanke, Ken (July 23, 2008). "Movie Review: Troll 2". Mountain Xpress. Archived from the original on October 19, 2013. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ Rosado, Ricardo (October 1, 2020). "Las 20 peores películas de la historia del cine: un homenaje". Fotogramas (in European Spanish). Retrieved January 26, 2022.
- ^ "Bad Movies: The 100 Worst Movies of All Time". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- I. G. N. Staff (June 16, 2000). "Highlander 2: Renegade Version". IGN.
- Williams, Isaac (January 5, 2022). "The 10 Worst Movie Sequels Ever, Ranked". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (November 1, 1991). "Highlander 2: The Quickening movie review (1991)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
- "Highlander 2: Renegade Version Review". IGN. June 16, 2000.
- "Highlander II: There can be only four cuts!". JoBlo Movie Network. November 24, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2013.
- ^ Russell, Jamie (April 23, 2012). "Why the Super Mario Movie Sucked". Wired. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ "Worst Movies of All Time Top 10". RiffTrax. 2012. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Grierson, Tim (May 26, 2020). "This week in genre history: Super Mario Bros. the movie gets an instant 'game over'". SyFy Wire. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- Siskel, Gene; Ebert, Roger (August 18, 2008). Siskel & Ebert Review "Super Mario Bros.". Archived from the original on August 10, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2016 – via YouTube.
- Walsh, Michael (June 22, 2022). "8 Things Fans Want To See In The Super Mario Movie". Collider. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- Shanfield, Ethan (April 4, 2023). "Mario Powers Up: How Nintendo Visionary Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination's Chris Meledandri Plan to Super Smash Hollywood". Variety. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- Bodanis, David (November 2020). "Directors". The Art of Fairness: The Power of Decency in a World Turned Mean. Abrams Books. ISBN 9781647003869.
The result was 1941, and while it's not the worst movie ever made—not when Super Mario Bros. is still available—it's definitely a contender.
- Hattenstone, Simon (August 3, 2007). "The Method? Living it out? Cobblers!". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 16, 2016. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
- Greenstreet, Rosanna (June 17, 2011). "Q&A: Bob Hoskins". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
- Vary, Adam (December 11, 2014). "Sony Pictures Lands "Mario Bros." Movie Rights From Nintendo, Leaked Emails Show". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on December 12, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
- Malkin, Marc (April 5, 2023). "'Super Mario Bros. Movie' Star Seth Rogen Calls Original 1993 Adaptation 'One of the Worst Films Ever Made'". Variety. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- "North Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- "Worst of 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org.
- "The Client, Lassie, It Could Happen to You, North, Barcelona, 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (July 22, 1994). "North movie review & film summary (1994)". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- "The Official Site of Gene Siskel". Cmgww.com. Archived from the original on February 26, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- LaSalle, Mick (January 8, 2011). "Rob Reiner's 'North' Is Distastefully Bad". The San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on November 13, 2003.
- Kristoffersen, Marius Vartdal (May 3, 2011). "Hva Var I Veien Med Dis?". Z Filmtidsskrift (in Norwegian). Retrieved July 14, 2014.
- ^ "Norges største kalkun flyr igjen". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). June 28, 2012. Archived from the original on August 14, 2012. Retrieved July 14, 2014.
- Pedersen, Brent Erik. "Hedrer Dagsavisens kritiker". Dagsavisen (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on June 17, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2014.
- "Slakter norsk film". Dagbladet (in Norwegian). Retrieved July 14, 2014.
- Persall, Steve (March 25, 1996). "'Showgirls' gets razzed". St. Petersburg Times. p. 2B.
- "Showgirls – Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- "The Movie Report Archive, Volume 1". TheMovieReport.com. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ White, Adam (March 18, 2020). "Showgirls: The remarkable resurrection of the worst movie ever made". The Independent. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
- Lynch, Stephen (October 3, 2001). "Critic picks worst movies of all time". Bartow Press. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
- Boyar, Jay (October 13, 1995). "'Scarlet Letter' is Untrue to the Hawthorne Tale". Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- Purdy, Alicia (May 26, 2012). "20 best-selling books that weren't as acclaimed as film adaptations". Deseret News. Archived from the original on December 13, 2013. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
- "The Scarlet Letter (1995)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
- ^ Hicks, Chris (December 22, 1995). "Best & Worst Movies of 1995". Deseret News. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- LaSalle, Mick (December 30, 1995). "So Bad You Can't Hate Them". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
- "Worst Film 1995". The Coast. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
- Schwartz, Amy E (October 24, 1995). "Even Hawthorne Would Have Laughed". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- Williamson, Kevin (February 19, 2009). "I Hate to Disagree with My Betters..." National Review. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- Trombetta, Sadie (November 5, 2015). "9 Books That Should Never Have Been Movies". Bustle. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
- Hellmann, Libby Fischer (August 7, 2016). "5 Great Books That Were Movie Stinkers". LibbyHellmann.com. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
- Snider, Eric (June 19, 2008). "Eric's Bad Movies: Bio-Dome (1996)". MTV News. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Ward, Cassidy (January 13, 2021). "Bio-Dome was a stoner movie flop, but Biosphere 2 was a real experiment". Syfy Wire. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ O'Brien, Jon (January 17, 2021). "How a '90s sci-fi comedy became one of the worst movies ever made". Inverse. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Bramesco, Charles (January 12, 2016). "20 Years Later, The Pure Stupidity Of 'Bio-Dome' Remains Unmatched". Uproxx. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Rabin, Nathan (August 27, 2008). "I Watched This On Purpose: Bio-Dome". The A.V. Club. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- Smith, Jodi (January 21, 2015). "Rifftrax Compiles The 20 Worst Movies Of The 90s: Disagree With Them, Won't You?". Pajiba. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- "In film, these were worst of 1996". Tampa Bay Times. March 25, 1997. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- "Batman & Robin". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
- "Batman & Robin (1997): Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved April 17, 2010.
- Nelson, Michael J (June 20, 2000). Mike Nelson's Movie Megacheese. Harper Collins. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-380-81467-1.
- Joel Schmacher (2005). "Making of" Introduction (DVD). Warner Bros.
- Sharf, Zack (October 5, 2021). "George Clooney Refuses to Show 'Batman & Robin' to His Wife: 'I Want Her to Have Respect for Me'". IndieWire. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
- George Clooney Says There’s ‘Not Enough Drugs in the World’ to Get Him to Play Batman Again, Even After ‘The Flash’ Cameo - Variety
- ^ Jade Lindgaard and Xavier De La Porte, The Imposter: BHL in Wonderland (Translated by John Howe) London; Verso, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84467-748-1 (p. 48-9).
- Dahlburg, John-Thor (March 28, 1997). "The Film That Plato Didn't Make". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
- Adams, Tim (December 8, 2011). "Public Enemies by Michel Houellebecq and Bernard-Henri Lévy – review". The Guardian. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
- "The volcano a molehill". L'Humanité. February 19, 1997. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
- ""Le Jour et la Nuit", pire film de l'histoire ... Vraiment?". Slate. October 3, 2010. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- Thiellement, Pacome. "Le film que BHL n'a pas compris (pourtant c'est son préféré !)". Blast le souffle de l’info (in French). Retrieved May 10, 2023.
- Pearson, Ben (October 30, 2018). "BBC Polls Critics, Releases 100 Greatest Foreign Films List". /Film. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
- "BHL et la critique ciné, c'était le jour et la nuit". 20 Minutes. October 11, 2010. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
- Cheshire, Godfrey (August 17, 1998). "The Avengers – Sputtering Spies: Steed and Peel Lack Appeal". Variety. Retrieved June 27, 2022.
- ^ Maslin, Janet (August 15, 1998). "'The Avengers': Shh! They're Trying Not to Be Noticed". The New York Times. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
- "Film-The Avengers". The Birmingham Post. August 19, 1998.
- ^ Jones, Alan. "Review: The Avengers". Radio Times. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
- ^ Bianculli, David (August 18, 1998). "Not So Excellent Avengers". New York Daily News. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
- "Double disasters make it to top of the flops". The Western Mail. Cardiff. December 1, 2003.
- ^ Lonergan, Aidan (August 16, 2018). "A definitive ranking of the 7 worst Irish films of all-time". The Irish Post. Retrieved March 9, 2019.
- Lines, Craig (November 4, 2015). "Meet Fatal Deviation, Ireland's only martial arts film". Den of Geek. Archived from the original on June 7, 2019. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
- McKinney, Luke (July 3, 2010). "Ireland's Only Kung Fu Movie (Is The Worst Film Ever Made)". Cracked.com. Retrieved March 9, 2019.
- "Westlife: what next?". Irish Independent. October 22, 2011. Retrieved March 9, 2019.
- Boehm, Simon (March 15, 2021). "Ireland's First Martial Arts Movie Is Gloriously Bad". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- Lloyd, Bryan (March 12, 2018). "10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die". entertainment.ie. Retrieved March 9, 2019.
- Vorel, Jim; Lowe, Kenneth (July 31, 2018). "Bad Movie Diaries: Fatal Deviation (1998)". Paste. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
- Andrew Collins, "How to Shoot a Real Turkey" The Observer, March 28, 1999. Observer Screen, p.6.
- "Winner's Turkey has a bad aftertaste". The Sunday Herald, May 2, 1999 (p.7)
- Miles Kingston, "One or two plots to occupy my declining years". The Independent, May 3, 2005, (p.30).
- Gleiberman, Owen (June 11, 1999). "Movie Review Underground Comedy Movie". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- Karger, Dave; Chang, Suna (October 16, 1998). "Monitor: Celebrity news for October 16, 1998". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- Van Gelder, Lawrence (May 28, 1999). "Lawrence Van Gelder's review of The Underground Comedy Movie". The New York Times. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- Dreher, Rod (May 28, 1999). "'Comedy' is Really Buried by Its Trash". New York Post.
- "Critic's Corner S-Z". Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. Archived from the original on April 12, 2001. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- Rabin, Nathan (September 4, 2018). "This Looks Terrible! The Underground Comedy Movie (1999)". nathanrabin.com. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- Bennett, Thom. "Underground Comedy Movie, The". Film Journal International. Archived from the original on November 5, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
- Young, Peter (March 26, 2013). "Comedy film best kept underground". Central Western Daily. Retrieved March 6, 2018.
- Battlefield Earth at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ "The worst of the worst pictures". Rotten Tomatoes. September 21, 2009. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (May 12, 2000). "Battlefield Earth movie review (2000)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Rabin, Nathan (September 11, 2007). "My Year OF Flops Case File #66: Battlefield Earth". The A.V. Club. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
- "Awards for Battlefield Earth". IMDb. Retrieved June 27, 2008.
- ^ "Razzie Noms for Worst Picture of the Decade". Razzies.com. Retrieved February 2, 2010.
- "Golden Raspberry Award Foundation". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on March 21, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ "Adam Sandler movie Jack and Jill sweeps Razzie awards". BBC News. April 2, 2012. Retrieved May 17, 2012.
- ^ "50 Worst Movies". Movie Review Query Engine. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- ^ Nicol, Will (May 10, 2017). "10 Worst Movies You Can Watch". Digital Trends. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- ^ Lisi, Brian (December 5, 2017). "The worst movies ever made". New York Daily News. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
- ^ Haines, Lester (April 20, 2012). "Battlefield Earth ruled worst film Ever". The Register. Retrieved April 5, 2018.
- Dembrow, Dylan (January 28, 2018). "15 Things You Didn't Know About The Disastrous Battlefield Earth". Screen Rant. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- ^ "12 Worst Animated Movies of All Time". Screen Rant. January 15, 2017. Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Mattson, Kelcie (September 11, 2023). "I Watched the Animated Titanic Musical So You Don't Have To". Collider. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- "Titanic: The Animated Movie". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- Brayton, Tim (May 20, 2020). "Titanic: The Legend Goes On... (2000) – Movie Review". Alternate Ending. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- Roberts, Will (January 15, 2017). "10 Worst Animated Movies of All Time". Showbiz Cheat Sheet. Archived from the original on January 22, 2022. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- Renzetti, Jackie (April 16, 2014). "Not Your Cameron's "Titanic"". The Minnesota Daily. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
- Clinton, Paul (April 19, 2001). "'Freddy Got Fingered' is a bad, bad film". CNN. Archived from the original on December 30, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- Epstein, Warren (April 26, 2001). "Task of fingering worst movies of all time a real handful". The Gazette. Colorado Springs, CO. Archived from the original on March 19, 2018.
- Hughes, Scott (April 26, 2001). "The worst movie ever?". The Guardian. London. Retrieved February 9, 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (April 20, 2001). "Freddy Got Fingered movie review (2001)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ "Freddy heads Razzies nominations". BBC News. February 11, 2002. Retrieved February 9, 2011.
- Waters, Darren (March 23, 2002). "Green gets fingered for Razzies". BBC News. Retrieved February 9, 2011.
- "Freddy Got Fingered". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Masters, Tim (March 7, 2010). "Sandra Bullock wins worst actress award at Razzies". BBC News. Retrieved February 9, 2011.
- Zwecker, Bill (January 22, 2002). "Mariah Carries On With Record Deal, Recovery". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
- "2001 RAZZIE® Nominees & "Winners"". Golden Raspberry Awards. December 4, 2005. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved June 30, 2012.
- ^ Shayo, Lukas (November 12, 2022). "10 Movies That Are A Negative 10 Out Of 10, According To Reddit". ScreenRant.
- "Mariah Carey's flop movie 'Glitter' almost killed her". Hindustan Times. November 4, 2009.
Carey, 39, had to be hospitalised due to an emotional breakdown after Glitter was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever.
- "The 30 worst Vanity Projects of all time". Fadeinonline.com. Fade In. June 2, 2013. Archived from the original on September 8, 2015. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
- Bob, McCann (2009). Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television. New York: Performing Arts. p. 70. ISBN 9780786458042.
- ^ Stephenson, Alison (November 13, 2013). "Absolute stinkers: The 15 worst movies of all time". News.com.au. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "Worst Films Ever: Glitter". Hi. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
- Hiatt, Brian (March 25, 2002). "Tom Green, Estella Warren are Razzie winners". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
- Reynolds, Simon (January 26, 2010). "Carey Blames 9/11 For 'Glitter' Flop". Digital Spy. Hachette Filipacchi Médias. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
- "Glitter (2001)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
- "All-Time Razzie Cham-Peens LIST – The Official Razzie® Forum". Golden Raspberry Awards. February 21, 2012. Archived from the original on February 21, 2012. Retrieved September 3, 2020.
- Poole, Oliver (October 11, 2002). "Madonna and Guy swept away on tide of criticism". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- "Not Swept Away By Madonna". The New York Observer. October 21, 2002. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- "Swept Away – Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- "Swept Away (2002)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- ^ "The worst movies ever to grace the screen". After Ellen.com. September 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 22, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2019.
- Fragoso, Sam (August 2, 2002). "The Master Of Disguise Movie Review (2002)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- "The Master of Disguise Film Review – The Master of Disguise Film Pictures, The Master of Disguise Film Trailer". Viewlondon.co.uk. October 16, 2006. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- "The Master of Disguise". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
- "David Hunter Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on December 17, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- Hunter, Stephen (September 20, 2002). "Goosey Lucy: 'Ballistic,' a Lot of Noisy Dumdum". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (September 20, 2020). "Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever movie review (2002)". Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- "ROTTEN TOMATOES: The Worst of the Worst Pictures". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on March 3, 2009. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Wood, Jennifer M (August 10, 2017). "The 15 Worst Movies Ever Made". Mental Floss. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
- ^ Peitzman, Louis (September 5, 2014). "The Man Behind The "Worst Gay Movie Of All Time" Doesn't Care If You Hate It". BuzzFeed. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
- Grant, Japhy (February 20, 2009). "Ben & Arthur: The Worst Gay Movie of All Time". Queerty. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
- Klemm, Michael D. (July 2004). "9 dead gay guys/ben & arthur". Cinemaqueer. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
- Adams, p. 301.
- ^ "Adventures of Pluto Nash and 13 Other Critically Maligned Flops That Bombed Because They Fucking Suck". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. March 23, 2021.
- "From Justin To Kelly". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 24, 2014.
- ^ Tyrangiel, Josh (February 5, 2006). "Miss Independent". Time Magazine.
- "Dishing it!" The Free Lance–Star, July 9, 2003, (p.56).
- Rabin, Nathan (November 11, 2009). "Contest-Winning Case File #150: From Justin To Kelly". The A.V. Club. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Gigli Takes Razzie Dishonors as Year's Worst", Reading Eagle, March 1, 2004 (p.20)
- Collis, Clark (July 20, 2009). "The Crazy Cult of 'The Room'". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- "The Couch Surfer: 'It may be sublimely rubbish, but The Room makes audiences happy'". The Independent. London. July 20, 2009. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
- Collis, Clark (December 30, 2008). "'The Room': Worst movie ever? Don't tell that to its suddenly in-demand star". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- Rose, Steve (September 9, 2009). "Is this the worst movie ever made?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
- Romano, Aja (December 2, 2017). "The Room: how the worst movie ever became a Hollywood legend as bizarre as its creator". Vox. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
- Park, Gene (November 30, 2017). "Perspective | 'The Room' is the worst movie ever made, but I've seen it a hundred times — without irony". Washington Post. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
- Donoughue, Paul (December 5, 2017). "The worst movie ever made, explained". ABC News. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
- Graff, Bernd (May 28, 2013). ""The Room", schlechtester Film aller Zeiten". Süddeutsche.de (in German). Retrieved March 18, 2020.
- Vishnevetsky, Ignatiy (November 30, 2017). "The Disaster Artist is a lousy tribute to the greatest bad movie of our time". The A.V. Club. Retrieved January 4, 2019.
- Goodwin, Christopher (April 12, 2009). "Cult hit (Even M is a recycled sex scene) The Room is best worst film". The Times. London. Archived from the original on June 15, 2011.
- Siblo, Matt (June 12, 2010). "Tommy Wiseau and The Room at AFI Silver Theatre: Friday, June 11 through Sunday, June 13". Washington City Paper. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ""Call Me by Your Name" wins Best Adapted Screenplay | 90th Oscars (2018)". April 17, 2018 – via YouTube.
- "The 90th Academy Awards | 2018". Oscars.org | Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. April 15, 2019.
- "James Franco Wins Best Actor, Musical or Comedy at the 2018 Golden Globes". January 7, 2018 – via YouTube.
- "Disaster Artist, The". goldenglobes.com.
- "The 50 Best Good Bad Movies". The Ringer. June 19, 2017.
- "A Look Back at 'Gigli,' the Infamous Bennifer-Starring Film, on Its 10th Anniversary". The Daily Beast. August 1, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- "The 'Gigli' Is Up". Fox News. July 30, 2003. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- ^ "Halle's Feline Fiasco Catwoman and President's Fahrenheit Blunders Tie for 25th Razzie Dis-Honors". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2011. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- Gigli at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ "Critics Pan "Worst Film Ever"". Sky News. February 23, 2004. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013.
- Kevin O'Sullivan, The Daily Mirror, March 5, 2004, (p.14)
- Henry Fitzherbert, The Sunday Express, February 22, 2004 (p.67).
- Catherine Shoard, The Sunday Telegraph, February 22, 2004.
- "Review:Sex Lives of the Potato Men. Daily Record, February 20, 2004.
- Donald Clarke, "Out of Office:Interview with Mackenzie Crook". "The Ticket" Magazine, The Irish Times, April 25, 2008, (p.6).
- Mike Davies, The Birmingham Post, April 24, 2008 (p. 13).
- Matthew Bell, Independent on Sunday, February 8, 2009, (p. 42).
- "Sex Lives Of The Potato Men on Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved January 12, 2015.
- ^ Halle Berry accepts Razzie Award | official Razzie YouTube channel.
- Catwoman at Rotten Tomatoes
- Lowerison, Jean. "'Catwoman' The cat and the Bratt". San Diego Metropolitan. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- Ahsan, Sadaf (February 27, 2018). "Writer of the worst movie of all time agrees that it was, indeed, the worst movie of all time". National Post. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
- Kim, Janet (July 20, 2004). "Me-Ouch – Page 1 – Movies – New York". Village Voice. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- "Diving into the worst-rated movies on IMDb". The Daily Dot. December 11, 2015. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
- "Filmemacher Ulli Lommel erliegt Herzinfarkt" (in German). n-tv. December 4, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
- "Daniel – Der Zauberer – Film 2004". Filmstarts.de. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- "Daniel Küblböck ist jetzt Wiesbadener". Frankfurter Rundschau (in German). February 15, 2009. Retrieved September 13, 2013.
- Astinus, A. D. (September 30, 2015). Die neun schlechtesten Filme der Kinogeschichte: Die ganze Welt der schlechtesten Kinofilme – Von Daniel, der Zauberer bis Kartoffelsalat – Nicht fragen! (in German). neobooks. ISBN 978-3-7380-4159-0.
- "Kinos setzen "Daniel der Zauberer" ab: Küblböck als Super-Flop". RP ONLINE (in German). September 17, 2004. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- "Die 25 schlechtesten Filme aller Zeitenstarts". Filmstarts.de. July 31, 2015. Retrieved March 8, 2019.
- "Die schlechtesten Filme | moviepilot.de". moviepilot.de (in German). Archived from the original on September 11, 2018. Retrieved March 8, 2019.
- "Schlechteste Filme aller Zeiten - Küblböck-Film läuft im SchleFaZ-Programm". moviepilot.de (in German). March 23, 2016. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
- "PopWatch Confessional: The worst movie a kid has made you sit through". Entertainment Weekly. January 16, 2015. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
- Long, Tom (November 17, 2004). "SuperBabies: Baby Geniuses 2". Deseret News. Archived from the original on June 24, 2018. Retrieved May 3, 2012.
- "'Catwoman' battles President Bush for worst acting prize". Daily Times. January 26, 2005. Archived from the original on November 11, 2013. Retrieved May 3, 2012.
- "50 Worst Sequels of All Time". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved January 8, 2022.
- Brooks, Xan (January 21, 2009). "The Love Guru leads Razzie nominations". The Guardian. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
- ^ Alone in the Dark at Rotten Tomatoes
- Alone in the Dark, retrieved March 24, 2022
- ^ Lincoln, Kevin (September 20, 2017). "What the 19 Movies to Ever Receive an 'F' CinemaScore Have in Common". Vulture. Retrieved January 17, 2019.
- Moore, Roger (January 28, 2005). "Alone in the Dark". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved June 13, 2014.
- Stein, Ruthe (January 28, 2005). "Film Clips / Also opening today". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- "Decade in review: Hartlaub's movie choices". San Francisco Chronicle . July 30, 2010.
- "'Dark' is dreary". The Gazette (Maryland). February 2, 2005. Archived from the original on November 12, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Erickson, Blair (February 2, 2005). "Behind the Scenes: Uwe Boll and Uwe Boll's Alone In the Dark". Something Awful.
- Weinberg, Scott (March 3, 2006). "2005 Stinker Awards Announced!". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on December 12, 2010. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- "Review: RGV Ki Aag is RGV ka daag". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009.
- "A Decade of decadence". The Times of India. December 31, 2010. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved August 25, 2013.
- "Review: Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag". Hindustan Times. August 31, 2007. Archived from the original on November 17, 2011. Retrieved August 25, 2013.
- "57 Worst Films Ever – II". FHM (India). Archived from the original on September 12, 2012. Retrieved August 25, 2013.
- "Amitabh Bachchan: 'Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag a mistake'". Digital Spy. July 11, 2011. Retrieved August 25, 2013.
- "Epic Movie", Metacritic, CBS Interactive, retrieved February 25, 2019
- Fletcher, Harry (June 20, 2018). "The 12 worst films ever made". The Standard. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
- Russell, Jamie (February 7, 2007). "BBC – Movies – review – Epic Movie". BBC. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
- Rabin, Nathan (January 29, 2007). "Epic Movie". The A.V. Club. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
- Sim, David; Watling, Eve (August 14, 2018). "The worst comedy films of all time, from 'Scary Movie 5' to 'The Hottie & the Nottie'". Newsweek. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
- Leopold, Todd (February 23, 2008). "Lohan's 'Killed Me' sets worst-film record". CNN. Retrieved February 12, 2019.
- "I Know Who Killed Me". How Did This Get Made?. Earwolf. October 18, 2011. Retrieved February 12, 2019.
- Ally, Croft (2012). The Lindsay Lohan Story. Orion Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1409136378.
- Delahaye, Gabe (June 23, 2008). "The Hunt For The Worst Movie Of All Time: I Know Who Killed Me". Stereogum. Retrieved February 12, 2019.
- "Disaster Movie – Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- Solomons, Jason (September 6, 2008). "Disaster Movie". The Guardian. London. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- Tobias, Adam (September 5, 2008). "Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time". Watertown Daily Times. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- Fleeman, Mike (January 21, 2009). "Kim Kardashian: Thanks for the Razzie Nomination!". People. Archived from the original on September 28, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
- "Meet the Spartans (2008)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "Meet the Spartans". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- Levin, Josh (January 30, 2008). "Meet the Spartans: another terrible spoof movie from the nongeniuses who brought you Date Movie and Epic Movie". Slate Magazine. Retrieved March 4, 2019.
- "The Hottie and the Nottie (2008)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved July 12, 2018.
- "The Hottie and the Nottie Review". The People. London, England. March 23, 2008.
Disaster Of Paris; Bimbo is worst actress ever
- Lee, Nathan (January 29, 2008). "Village Voice Review". Villagevoice.com. Archived from the original on October 30, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
- "James Berardinelli review". Reelviews.net. May 13, 2007. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
- ^ "The Hottie and The Nottie". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
- "A Rohadt Kritikusok szerint a Pappa Pia túltolta a fostalicskát". 444.hu (in Hungarian). August 20, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- "10 éves az Álom.net, amivel Steiner Kristóf "görbe tükröt akart mutatni az akkori generációnak"". 24.hu (in Hungarian). April 16, 2019. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- Dávid, Sajó (November 26, 2014). "Készül a folytatás minden idők legrosszabb magyar filmjéhez". Index.hu (in Hungarian). Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- Clarke, Donald (April 19, 2011). "What's the worst film of all time?". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on February 3, 2012. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- "Minden idők tíz legrosszabb filmje". fmc.hu (in Hungarian). Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- "Birdemic Has Romance and Suspense and All That". Viceland Today. February 12, 2010. Archived from the original on September 14, 2012. Retrieved April 16, 2011.
- Parker, Ethan (October 30, 2020). "Birdemic Makes The Crows Have Eyes 3 Look Like a Hitchcock Masterpiece". CBR.
- "Is Birdemic worst film ever made?". BBC News. April 6, 2010. Retrieved April 16, 2011.
- Periera, Fabio (March 9, 2010). "Review: Birdemic: Shock and Terror". HuffPost. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- "Birdemic: Shock and Terror, One More for the Trash-terpiece Heap". The Village Voice. March 30, 2010. Archived from the original on March 20, 2011. Retrieved April 16, 2011.
- Weiner, Jonah (April 6, 2010). "The Worst Movies Ever Made". Slate. Retrieved April 16, 2011.
- ""Birdemic": The magic of atrocious CGI, confirmed". Salon. February 25, 2011. Archived from the original on February 28, 2011. Retrieved May 6, 2011.
- Scheib, Ronnie (March 29, 2010). "Variety Reviews – Birdemic: Shock and Terror". Variety. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved May 6, 2011.
- eas106 (October 25, 2012). "RiffTrax Live: Birdemic (2012) Movie Tickets, Reviews, and Photos". Fandango.com. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - Harvey, Dennis (April 29, 2013). "Film Review: 'Birdemic 2: The Resurrection'".
- McMillan, Graeme (December 17, 2008). "Avatar Casting Makes Fans See... White". io9. Gawker Media. Retrieved December 19, 2008.
- Onda, David. "The Last Airbender". Comcast. Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved December 22, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger. "The Last Airbender". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved December 22, 2013.
- Ryan, Mike (July 1, 2010). "25 Questions You May Have About The Last Airbender". Vanity Fair. Retrieved December 22, 2013.
- "M Night Shyamalan's Last Airbender wins Razzie Awards". BBC News. February 27, 2011. Retrieved February 27, 2011.
- "The 31st Annual Razzie Awards". Golden Raspberry Awards. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013.
- Wilson, Natasha. "The Worst Films Ever: The Last Airbender". Hi. Archived from the original on August 8, 2014. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
- Couch, Aaron (December 1, 2016). "Dev Patel on Regretting 'Last Airbender': I "Saw a Stranger on the Screen"". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on December 2, 2016. Retrieved December 1, 2016.
- "THR Full Oscar Actor's Roundtable: Andrew Garfield, Casey Affleck, Dev Patel, & More". January 23, 2017. Archived from the original on October 28, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2017 – via YouTube.
- Cook, Linda (September 12, 2011). "'Bucky' is the worst of the worst". Quad-City Times. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
- ^ D'Alessio, Jeff (April 16, 2023). "Top critics: The worst film I ever reviewed". The News-Gazette. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
- Lowe, Kenneth; Vorel, Jim (August 30, 2018). "Bad Movie Diaries: Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011)". Paste. Retrieved July 12, 2022.
- Musto, Michael (June 12, 2014). "The 10 worst comedies ever made". The Blot Magazine. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
- Eggers, Toph (November 14, 2011). "The tragedy of Adam Sandler". Salon. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
- Roeper, Richard. "Footloose, Like Crazy, and Jack and Jill". Richard Roeper & The Movies. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
- Setoodeh, Ramin (November 11, 2011). "Movie Review: Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made". The Daily Beast. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
- Mike Stoklasa, Jay Bauman (November 20, 2011). "Half in the Bag: Jack and Jill". RedLetterMedia. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
- "Jack and Jill (2011)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved June 10, 2019.
- McGranaghan, Mike (November 1, 2011). "Jack and Jill". The Aisle Seat. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- McKay, Hollie (April 30, 2012). "Comedy about middle school statutory rape? Does Adam Sandler's That's My Boy go too far?". Fox News. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "Is Adam Sandler Serious With That's My Boy? | DrJays.com Live | Fashion. Music. Lifestyle". Live.drjays.com. May 21, 2012. Archived from the original on December 12, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "Adam Sandler's new movie That's My Boy exploits child victims of sexual assault. Please boycott the movie. | National Coalition For Men". NCFM. May 2, 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "Adam Sandler hates you". Salon.com. June 16, 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "Pervs will be pervs in That's My Boy – Chicago Sun-Times". Suntimes.com. Archived from the original on June 17, 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "That's My Boy review by Richard Haridy". Quickflix. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- ^ "That's My Boy – Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "That's My Boy (review)". FlickFilosopher.com. January 23, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- Lack, Jonathan R. (June 15, 2012). "That's My Boy Review". Wegotthiscovered.com. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- The Ooh Tray (October 2, 2012). "Film Review: That's My Boy". The Ooh Tray. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "Razzie Winners". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on February 27, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- "That's My Boy". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "The 100 Best "B Movies" of All Time". pastemagazine.com. May 8, 2014. Archived from the original on June 24, 2018. Retrieved June 29, 2022.
- ^ Hawkes, Rebecca (August 2, 2017). "Forget The Emoji Movie: discover Foodfight!, the worst children's animation of all time". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on June 24, 2018. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (February 27, 2013). "Supermarket Brands Sponsored Case File #34: Foodfight!". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on August 26, 2017. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Sherlock, Ben (June 30, 2020). "The 5 Best (& 5 Worst) Animated Movies From The 2010s". Screen Rant. Retrieved January 7, 2020.
With a reported budget of $65 million and a box office gross of less than $74,000, Foodfight! was a devastating financial catastrophe, and it's since been branded one of the worst movies ever made.
- Rossen, Jake (August 9, 2013). "Placing Products? Try Casting Them". The New York Times. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Rabin, Nathan (February 12, 2019). "This Looks Terrible! Foodfight! (2012)". nathanrabin.com. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Nicholson, Tom (June 10, 2020). "The Best Movies To Watch While Very, Very Stoned". Esquire. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- "Foodfight! Review". Hollywood News. October 25, 2012. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- "Foodfight! (2012)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Brayton, Tim (April 24, 2015). "Foodfight! (2012) – Movie Review". Alternate Ending. Archived from the original on January 7, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Pacheco, Diego Pineda (November 27, 2024). "The 10 Worst Fantasy Movies of the 2010s, Ranked". Collider. Retrieved December 1, 2024.
- Charlebois, Mathieu (November 29, 2018). "The worst movies of all time". MSN. Archived from the original on January 6, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Ehrbar, Greg (May 8, 2013). "DVD REVIEW: "FoodFight!"". Indiewire. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- Venegas, Jasmine (August 18, 2021). "10 Movies With Less-Than-Subtle Advertisements". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
- "Movie may be the biggest Turkey ever", Daily News, South Africa, February 21, 2013.
- ^ "The Worst Film in History?". Studio Briefing. February 21, 2013. Archived from the original on February 26, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
- Drake, Matthew (October 6, 2013). "Danny Dyer's film company went bust with debt to taxpayer of £25,000". The Mirror. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "'Run for Your Wife' - Is this the worst movie ever filmed?". uk.movies.yahoo.com. February 16, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- Bradshaw, Peter (February 14, 2013). "Run for Your Wife – review". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Film review: Run for Your Wife (12A)". The Independent. February 15, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Run for Your Wife – 'As funny as leprosy'". The Independent (London). January 30, 2015.
- Edwards, David (February 15, 2013). "Movie Review: Run for your wife (12A)". Daily Record. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Run For Your Wife: Is this movie the biggest turkey ever filmed?". The Independent. February 15, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Run for Your Wife", Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette, March 11, 2013.
- "Danny Dyer's Run For Your Wife takes just £602 at the box office". Radio Times. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Danny Dyer's 'Run For Your Wife' flops with £747 at the box office". Digital Spy. February 20, 2013. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
- "Run For Your Wife (2013)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- Hodges, Mike (May 27, 2013). "Fateful Findings". Film Threat. Archived from the original on February 22, 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
- Rabin, Nathan (December 8, 2015). "Why Fateful Findings Deserves Cult Status". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
- Kalan, Elliot; McCoy, Dan; Wellington, Stuart (September 19, 2015). Ep. #187 – Fateful Findings. The Flop House. Event occurs at 50:22 to 50:55. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
- Oller, Jacob (September 1, 2023). "Fateful Findings: The Room for the Next Generation of Bad Movie Lovers". Paste Magazine. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
- King, Susan (March 1, 2014). "'Movie 43' is named worst film of 2013 at the 34th Razzie Awards". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
- Howell, Peter (January 25, 2013). "Movie 43 review: The worst film ever gets zero stars". Toronto Star. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "Movie 43". Murphy Reviews. January 30, 2013. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Roeper, Richard (January 25, 2013). "There's awful and THEN there's Movie 43". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Tobias, Scott (January 28, 2013). "Weekend Box Office: Race to the bottom". The A.V. Club. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- Weitzman, Elizabeth (January 26, 2013). "Movie Review: Movie 43". New York Daily News. New York. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- "Humshakals (2014)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 10, 2017.
- ^ Fadnavis, Mihir (June 22, 2014). "Humshakals review: How Saif, Riteish teamed up to give your brain damage". Firstpost. Retrieved July 22, 2014.
- Dwivedi, Saurabh (June 20, 2014). "Movie review: Humshakals is three times trash". India Today.
- Francis, Sneha May (June 29, 2014). "Saif Ali Khan's 'Humshakals' act could make Kareena insecure". Emirates 24/7. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
- Syed, Itrath (June 25, 2014). "Humshakals redefines dreadfulness". The Georgia Straight. Retrieved July 10, 2017.
- PTI (February 17, 2015). "Humshakals' leads nominations list at Golden Kela Awards". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
- IANS (March 15, 2015). "Sonakshi and Arjun grab top Golden Kela awards". The National. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
- Mehta, Ankhita (March 9, 2015). "Ghanta Awards 2015 Complete Winners List: Sonakshi Sinha, Ajay Devgn Win Worst Actor Awards; Farah Khan Worst Director". International Business Times. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
- IANS (August 8, 2014). "Sajid Khan's Humshakals left me disturbed: Bipasha Basu". Hindustan Times. Mumbai. Archived from the original on August 9, 2014.
- "Bipasha: Humshakals was the worst experience of my life". Rediff.com. August 26, 2014.
- "Humshakals: I asked my father not to watch the film, says Esha Gupta". Times of India. July 2, 2014.
- "Saif Ali Khan: Humshakals was a mistake". Times of India. July 18, 2014.
- Kenigsberg, Ben (November 13, 2014). "To Save Us All From Satan's Power". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
- ^ "Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
- "The 25 Worst Christmas Movies of All Time". Billings Gazette. December 12, 2016. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- ^ Kohn, Eric (June 19, 2017). "Critics Pick the Worst Movies They've Ever Reviewed". IndieWire. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- Lemire, Christy (November 21, 2014). "Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas". Christy Lemire. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- Taylor, Reece (December 24, 2022). "Is This Christmas Film the Worst Movie of All Time?". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
- Koonse, Emma (November 21, 2014). "Kirk Cameron Urges Fans to Improve Saving Christmas Rating, 'Help Me Storm the Gates of Rotten Tomatoes'". The Christian Post. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- Wakeman, Gregory (November 25, 2014). "Kirk Cameron Tried To Cheat Rotten Tomatoes, It Did Not Go Well". CinemaBlend. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- O'Neal, Sean (December 5, 2014). "Kirk Cameron Is Crucified at the Hands of IMDb Users, Rises with Jesus Coffee". The A.V. Club. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
- King, Susan (February 21, 2015). "Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas Dominates the 35th Razzie Awards". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 28, 2017.
- "Tim Roth calls his FIFA movie United Passions 'awful', says he only made it to pay his kids' college fees". Metro.co. December 23, 2015.
- ^ Idato, Michael (February 26, 2017). "Razzie Awards: Hillary's America blows golden raspberries at pre-Oscar awards shamefest". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved January 6, 2020.
- ^ Scheck, Frank. "'United Passions': Film Review". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
- Parker, Graham (June 2, 2015). "Sepp Blatter: A history of scandal". Al Jazeera. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
- Koylu, Enis. "Is United Passions the worst movie of all time? Fifa propaganda film paints Blatter as a bastion of morality". Goal.com. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- ^ Field, Paul (June 3, 2015). "United Passions review: FIFA's hideous £16 million movie is unintentional comedy gold". Daily Mirror. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
- Kelly, Des (October 27, 2014). "Sugar-coated FIFA film is spreading around Europe like a virus". London Evening Standard. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
- Mahoney, Sean (June 8, 2015). "Worst Movie Ever: 'United Passions' FIFA Film Called 'Unwatchable' And 'Cinematic Excrement'". Inquisitr.
- Gold, Daniel M. (June 4, 2015). "Review: In 'United Passions', a Fictionalized FIFA, Underwritten by the Soccer Group". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 5, 2015. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
- "'United Passions' not getting good reviews". CNN. June 14, 2015. Retrieved September 4, 2015.
- "United Passions (2015)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- Rife, Katie (June 19, 2015). "FIFA vanity project United Passions breaks box-office record (not the good kind)". The A.V. Club. The Onion. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- Knoblauch, Austin (June 25, 2015). "'United Passions,' which cost FIFA $29 million, has $607 box-office take". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved June 8, 2015.
- ^ "FIFA film 'United Passions' one of worst in U.S. box office history". ESPN FC. (ESPN). June 25, 2015. Retrieved June 21, 2015.
- ^ Roxborough, Scott & Richford, Rhonda (June 17, 2015). "FIFA Movie Director Breaks Silence on Bomb: "It's a Disaster; My Name Is All Over [This Mess]"". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
- "Razzie Awards Mock 'Fifty Shades of Grey,' Redeem Sylvester Stallone". The Hollywood Reporter. February 28, 2016. Retrieved January 6, 2020.
- Howard, Courtney (January 22, 2016). "How DIRTY GRANDPA Made My Feminism Hurt: An Exposé". Sassy Mama in LA. Archived from the original on December 27, 2018. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- Lang, Nico (February 10, 2016). "Some of Hollywood's Most Successful Comedies Have a "Hipster Homophobia" Problem". Slate Magazine. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- Murthi, Vikram (January 22, 2016). "Reviews: Is 'Dirty Grandpa' Robert DeNiro's Worst Movie Ever?". IndieWire. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- Ryan, Mike (January 21, 2016). "'Dirty Grandpa': The Most Important Movie Ever Made". Uproxx. Retrieved January 16, 2018.
- Hammond, Pete (January 22, 2016). "'Dirty Grandpa' Review: The Worst Film Of Robert De Niro's Career (Or Maybe Anybody's)". Deadline. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- McDonald, Glenn (January 22, 2016). "Movie review: The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn". INDY Week. Archived from the original on December 27, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- "'Dirty Grandpa': Robert De Niro deserves better than this dreck". Chicago Sun-Times. March 6, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
- Richard Roeper Reviews "Dirty Grandpa", January 21, 2016, archived from the original on October 28, 2021, retrieved September 29, 2019
- kermodeandmayo (January 29, 2016), Dirty Grandpa reviewed by Mark Kermode, archived from the original on October 28, 2021, retrieved December 27, 2018
- kermodeandmayo (December 30, 2016), The Ten Worst Films of 2016: Part Two, archived from the original on October 28, 2021, retrieved December 27, 2018
- "Dirty Grandpa (2016)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved November 18, 2021.
- "Dirty Grandpa Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved September 28, 2019.
- Couch, Aaron (August 26, 2016). "Trailer for Russian Superhero Movie 'Guardians' Is So Weird It Just Might Be Good". The Hollywood Reporter.
- "Guardians" – via mubi.com.
- "Guardians (2017)". Letterboxd. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- Дерьмо на экспорт. kg-portal.ru (in Russian). October 23, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- Ослик, суслик, Андреасян. Rossiyskaya Gazeta (in Russian). February 24, 2017. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- Фильмы на неделю: патриотические (и ужасающие) "Защитники", а также "Джеки", "Тони Эрдманн" и "Слишком свободный человек". Meduza (in Russian). October 23, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- "Защитники" Сарика Андреасяна: наш ответ Говарду-утке. Afisha (in Russian). October 23, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- Защитите нас от "Защитников". Ivi, Inc. (in Russian). October 23, 2017. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- Самый худший фильм: какие картины последних лет разочаровали зрителей. РИА Новости (in Russian). RIA Novosti. November 28, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- Худшие фильмы (in Russian). Kritikanstvo. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- "Guardians (Zashchitniki)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved November 18, 2021.
- Kozlov, Vladimir (February 23, 2016). "Russian Cold War Superhero Film to Get China Release Under Import Quota". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (August 1, 2022). "Loqueesha is Somehow Much Worse Than It Looks". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
- Graham, Adam (May 13, 2019). "Detroit-set film 'Loqueesha' causes social media stir". The Detroit News. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Richards, Brian (May 11, 2019). ""Loqueesha" Is A Movie That Actually Exists In The Year 2019, And This Trailer Is More Disturbing Than Any Horror Movie". Pajiba. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Lloyd, Brian (May 11, 2019). "Here's the trailer for 'Loqueesha', the worst movie of this decade". Entertainment.ie. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- "Loqueesha". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- Golby, Joel (June 8, 2019). "Is Loqueesha the worst film ever made?". The Guardian. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Kahan, Dan (June 23, 2019). "Delete This Film: "Loqueesha" Is Genuinely the Worst Movie I've Ever Watched". Popdust. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- Kay-B (June 5, 2019). "'Loqueesha,' The Year's Most Reviled Movie, Is Now Streaming on Amazon Prime". Decider. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- "Andrew Lloyd Webber Lashes Out At 'Cats' Movie And Director". HuffPost. August 3, 2020.
- "Andrew Lloyd Webber slams Cats film adaptation". Entertainment Weekly.
- "'Cats' Movie May Happen, Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber Says". TheWrap. December 3, 2013. Archived from the original on July 20, 2018. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
- Ramos, Dino-Ray (August 2, 2020). "Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"". Deadline. Retrieved August 3, 2020.
- O'Malley, Sheila. "Cats movie review & film summary (2019) | Roger Ebert". RogerEbert.com.
- "Cats (2019)" – via letterboxd.com.
- Ramos, Dino-Ray (August 2, 2020). "Andrew Lloyd Webber Says Movie Adaptation Of 'Cats' Was "Ridiculous"". Deadline. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
- Ricker, Thomas (December 23, 2019). "Cats is being patched with 'improved visual effects'". The Verge.
- ""1917" wins Best Visual Effects". March 11, 2020 – via YouTube.
- "The Oscars' Cats Jokes Has The Academy In Hot Water With The Visual Effects Society – CINEMABLEND". February 11, 2020.
- "Cats (2019)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
- "Razzies 2020 winners list: Cats wins Worst Picture at Razzie Awards". Entertainment Weekly.
- Lodge, Guy (December 18, 2019). "Feline confident? Cats' last-minute dash to the cinema". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Star Wars and Cats: First reactions pour in". BBC News. December 17, 2019. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- Convery, Stephanie (December 19, 2019). "'A furry orgy in a dumpster': what the reviews say about Cats". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- Robey, Tim (December 19, 2019). "Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- "Cats star Jason Derulo says 'reviews don't matter' after the film is panned by critics". The Telegraph. December 19, 2019. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- Robey, Tim (December 19, 2019). "Cats review: a sinister, all-time disaster from which no one emerges unscathed". The Telegraph.
- Graham, Adam (December 19, 2019). "Review: Me-ouch! Film version of 'Cats' a Deuteronomy disaster". The Detroit News. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- "'Cats': Critics pan Andrew Lloyd Webber musical's movie adaptation". The Washington Post.
- "'Cats': A Broadway Musical Adaptation Straight Outta the Litter Box". Rolling Stone.
- Major, Wade (December 20, 2019). "TOMATO SLAM: CATS".
- Chilton, Louis (May 15, 2020). "Writer of Battlefield Earth names Cats as the new worst movie ever". The Independent. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- Spencer, Ashley (July 2, 2020). "How '365 Days' Became One of Netflix's Worst-Reviewed Big Hits". The New York Times.
- "365 Days: the Netflix softcore porn film that people can't stop watching". The Guardian. June 23, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- ^ Day, Matt (June 23, 2020). "Controversial erotic thriller dubbed one of the worst films EVER becomes global smash". The First News. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2024.
- 365 Days (2020), retrieved August 7, 2021
- Taylor Andrews (June 8, 2020). "Please, I Beg You: Do Not Watch '365 DNI' for Anything but the Sex Scenes". Cosmopolitan. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- Maher, Kevin (June 19, 2020). "365 Days review — this Polish soft-porn flick is execrable". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- "27 reasons why '365 Days' is the worst thing Netflix has ever produced". UK. June 16, 2020. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- Kiang, Jessica (June 10, 2020). "'365 Days': Film Review". Variety. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- Bolling, Gaius (March 12, 2021). "Razzie Nominations: Dolittle & 365 Days top nods for worst of the year".
- "RAZZ NEWZ". The Razzies!. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
- "Razzie Awards 2021 Winners: Music, 365 Days Win Big at 41st Golden Raspberry Awards".
- Bonaime, Ross (February 16, 2023). "'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: Oh (Don't) Bother". Collider.
- Neuenkirchen, Andreas (February 10, 2023). "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey Is Building to an Anti-Disney Horror Universe". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- Searle, Tyler B. (August 5, 2022). "The 10 Best Winnie the Pooh Movies Before Seeing 'Blood And Honey'". Collider.
- Harvey, Dennis (February 16, 2023). "'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Review: An Un-Bear-Able Horror Cheapie". Variety. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
- Allen, Nick (February 16, 2023). "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
- ^ Rabin, Nathan (February 20, 2023). "I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey". Nathan Rabin's Bad Ideas. Retrieved March 11, 2024.
- Wood, Shawn Paul (November 12, 2023). "Bearly Watchable 'Winnie the Pooh: Blood And Honey' Dared Disney To Stop It". The Cinema Spot. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- Villei, Matt (February 16, 2023). "First 'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' Reactions Call It "Stifled," "So Bad It's Good," and the Worst Movie Ever". Collider. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- Phillips, Zoe G. (March 9, 2024). "Razzie Awards: 'Winnie The Pooh: Blood and Honey' Sweeps Its Five Nominated Categories". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- Kyrill Panasenko (July 16, 2022). Jim Cummings Talks Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey. Retrieved January 18, 2025 – via YouTube.
Works cited
- Adams, Michael (2010). Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies: a film critic's year-long quest to find the worst movie ever made. New York: Itbooks. ISBN 978-0-06-180629-2.
- Maltin, Leonard (2003). Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide. Signet. ISBN 0-451-20940-0.
- Medved, Harry (1978). The Fifty Worst Films of All Time: (and how they got that way). Popular Library. ISBN 0-445-04139-0.
- Medved, Michael (1980). The Golden Turkey Awards. G. P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 0-399-50463-X.
- Sauter, Michael (1999). The Worst Movies of All Time, or, What Were They Thinking?. Carol Publishing Group. ISBN 0-8065-2078-7.
- Wallechinsky, David; Wallace, Irving; Wallace, Amy (1977). The Book of Lists. William Morrow and Company. ISBN 978-0688031831.
- Wilson, John (2005). The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 0-446-69334-0.
External links
Lists of works considered the worst or otherwise known for negative reception | |
---|---|