| Revision as of 14:35, 29 July 2024 editCduffymul (talk | contribs)111 edits →Citadel Securities Intern program: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:14, 19 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,682 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:ZimZalaBim/Archive 12) (bot | ||
| (48 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == A Barnstar For You! == | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 22 == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Integrity''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your work on the Brian Thompson article, for being bold enough to remove contentious material ] (]) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ] (]) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Music of Turkmenistan == | |||
| (].) --] (]) 17:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Your reversion of my edits to Music of Turkmenistan "because they did not appear constructive" strikes me as odd. I researched several sources on Turkmen music, added those citations, condensed several pages of text into a relatively compact volume of text. I then asked two Turkmen musicians to review the edits; they approved of them. I added a section on modern classical music, another on modern pop music, and expanded the classical folk section to include a condensed synopsis I composed based on the standard text on Turkmen folk music, the 1928 book by Uspenskiy and Belyayev. I respectfully request that you revert your reversion of my additions. Allan Mustard, former U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan (2015-2019). ] (]) 01:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :If you feel I made an error then you can revert my edit. --] <sup style="color:black">]</sup> 14:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thank you, I will. ] (]) 15:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Race and appearance of Jesus at thomas == | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Why were the edites clarifieng at Thomas view on the defects of Chrost body removed, when at Thomas believed that Christ body had defects and wasn't the most perfect. ] (]) 20:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, just wanted to say thank you for the changes to the John 5[REDACTED] page. It makes much more sense to have the no names policy in place for his children. My change which you corrected was only to try and clear up some misinformation that had been posted about his family. But appreciate this new update. BTW, I added some citations to points that had been requested and removed some info that a citation/source could not be found for and also removed a reference to a specific tour he supported as I didn't feel it was needed. I've left notes on all my edits. Would you be able to take a look. I don't want to remove the citation template at the top of the page myself and would rather an experienced editor make that call. Thanks. Have a good day! ] 14:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :You appear to be inserting ]. Please disucss on the relevant ] to ensure there is ] for your insertions. --] <sup style="color:black">]</sup> 20:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Comment == | |||
| == Hi, just a friendly reminder that[REDACTED] is supposed to be an impartial platform. == | |||
| What did you comment on my talk page, if you ever did? ] (]) 03:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Please check up on guidelines for using wikipedia. Especially on neutrality. | |||
| :Click "View history" at the top of your talk page and you'll get to where you can view all the iterations of your talk page. I placed a warning that I realized wasn't necessary so I removed it. --] <sup style="color:black">]</sup> 04:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Tesla Cybertruck article Other Concerns section == | |||
| Here is a link for reference: | |||
| Hey there, I noticed you removed the entry relating to the first fatal crash of the Cybertruck, I classified it as a broader concern following the paragraph above it: | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#:~:text=All%20encyclopedic%20content%20on%20Wikipedia,reliable%20sources%20on%20a%20topic. ] (]) 16:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| "The Cybertruck's angular design and stiff stainless-steel exterior raised concerns among safety experts that it could hurt pedestrians and cyclists and damage other vehicles on roads. Particular concerns were raised about the high stiffness of the "exoskeleton" exterior, potentially reducing crumple zones. The tall, flat front of the truck may increase the severity of injuries to the legs of pedestrians struck." | |||
| == changing a photo == | |||
| Whilst I understand if the paragraph should be rewritten and made to suit the article or following from the above paragraph about the design of the Cybertruck, this also isn't the first time this incident has occurred, there have been three separate instances where the Cybertruck has spontaneously ignited causing death to almost all occupants from each incident, dying only from seemingly minor to possibly major situations where in other branded cars (including EV's) they wouldn't have proved fatal in most cases, I felt it pertinent to state that alongside the safety concerns about the Cybertruck's body since it's related to crash statistics and survivability factors, but if you also think it should be in an even more neutral position or point of view we can also do that. ] (]) 05:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| still new to editing, doing my best to adhere to the standards. I understand now why the photo I changed was flagged for removal, what would you recommend for changing a photo? would it have to be a photo I took, or something that is public domain somehow, or a photo that was sent to me? sorry I'm just unclear on the procedure for indicating that a photo does not have a copyright ] (]) 18:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:This is best discussed on the article's talk page. --] <sup style="color:black">]</sup> 15:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Citadel Securities Intern program == | |||
| Hello ZimZalaBim. I noticed your deletion of the “Internship program” section from ] after a user added unsourced information to it. Would you kindly reconsider reinstating the original paragraph that was properly sourced? Or, if you prefer, I have an alternative version that perhaps is more encyclopedic, since it leaves out dates and makes the information less time-dependent. See what you think of this: | |||
| ::Citadel Securities sponsors an 11-week summer internship program each year in which the interns learn about the company and its operations. The program accepts less than 1 percent of those who apply. Most are college seniors, and about half are software engineers, while the rest usually include quantitative researchers and traders. The program attracts top-talent in a competitive environment that includes ], ], ] and others.<ref name="Math Geniuses">{{cite news |last1=Yilun Chen |first1=Lulu |title=Citadel Vets 69,000 Intern Applicants to Find Next Math Geniuses |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-28/how-much-can-hedge-fund-interns-earn-citadel-pays-19-000-a-month |publisher=Bloomberg |date=29 August 2023}}</ref><ref name="$19,000">{{cite news |last1=Yilun Chen |first1=Lulu |title=Interns earn $19,000 monthly at finance giant Citadel. But they need some 'exceptional' skills to get in the door |url=https://fortune.com/2023/08/28/citadel-internship/ |publisher=Fortune |date=29 August 2023}}</ref> | |||
| The internship program is a significant part of the company and its recruiting, as evidenced by the many notable sources dedicated to it. Here are a few articles on the subject for reference: | |||
| https://fortune.com/2023/08/28/citadel-internship/; https://www.businessinsider.com/citadel-summer-internship-ramps-up-recruiting-2024-5; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-01/citadel-picks-less-than-0-3-of-applicants-for-sydney-internship; https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/citadel-internship; https://nypost.com/2023/08/29/citadel-interns-make-19k-a-month-if-they-get-into-math-boot-camp/; https://www.businessinsider.com/citadel-hedge-fund-summer-intern-boot-camp-ken-griffin-2023-8; | |||
| I appreciate your consideration of this. Thank you. ] (]) 13:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 13:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ::::Hi. Thanks for the reply, I will discuss it on the Talk page. And sorry for the duplicate post, it was posted by mistake. Regards, ] (]) 14:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{ref-talk}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:14, 19 January 2025
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A Barnstar For You!
|
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
| For your work on the Brian Thompson article, for being bold enough to remove contentious material MWFwiki (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
MWFwiki (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Music of Turkmenistan
Your reversion of my edits to Music of Turkmenistan "because they did not appear constructive" strikes me as odd. I researched several sources on Turkmen music, added those citations, condensed several pages of text into a relatively compact volume of text. I then asked two Turkmen musicians to review the edits; they approved of them. I added a section on modern classical music, another on modern pop music, and expanded the classical folk section to include a condensed synopsis I composed based on the standard text on Turkmen folk music, the 1928 book by Uspenskiy and Belyayev. I respectfully request that you revert your reversion of my additions. Allan Mustard, former U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan (2015-2019). 108.18.142.221 (talk) 01:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you feel I made an error then you can revert my edit. --ZimZalaBim 14:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will. 108.18.142.221 (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Race and appearance of Jesus at thomas
Why were the edites clarifieng at Thomas view on the defects of Chrost body removed, when at Thomas believed that Christ body had defects and wasn't the most perfect. 73.87.130.123 (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- You appear to be inserting unsourced commentary. Please disucss on the relevant talk pages to ensure there is consensus for your insertions. --ZimZalaBim 20:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Comment
What did you comment on my talk page, if you ever did? Gerominostilton (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Click "View history" at the top of your talk page and you'll get to this page where you can view all the iterations of your talk page. I placed a warning that I realized wasn't necessary so I removed it. --ZimZalaBim 04:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Tesla Cybertruck article Other Concerns section
Hey there, I noticed you removed the entry relating to the first fatal crash of the Cybertruck, I classified it as a broader concern following the paragraph above it:
"The Cybertruck's angular design and stiff stainless-steel exterior raised concerns among safety experts that it could hurt pedestrians and cyclists and damage other vehicles on roads. Particular concerns were raised about the high stiffness of the "exoskeleton" exterior, potentially reducing crumple zones. The tall, flat front of the truck may increase the severity of injuries to the legs of pedestrians struck."
Whilst I understand if the paragraph should be rewritten and made to suit the article or following from the above paragraph about the design of the Cybertruck, this also isn't the first time this incident has occurred, there have been three separate instances where the Cybertruck has spontaneously ignited causing death to almost all occupants from each incident, dying only from seemingly minor to possibly major situations where in other branded cars (including EV's) they wouldn't have proved fatal in most cases, I felt it pertinent to state that alongside the safety concerns about the Cybertruck's body since it's related to crash statistics and survivability factors, but if you also think it should be in an even more neutral position or point of view we can also do that. Aeyeu (talk) 05:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is best discussed on the article's talk page. --ZimZalaBim 15:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)