Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tulsa race massacre: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:20, 13 July 2024 editMa7ged (talk | contribs)88 edits Inaccurate number of deaths: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:32, 21 January 2025 edit undoMahoopes (talk | contribs)60 edits New 123-page DOJ report. Can this PDF be embedded and made accessible? 
(16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
}} }}


== Riot and Massacre == == KKK and ABB ==


Three links which are of historical relevance are:
I'm going to state my case here for why I think Tulsa Race Riot is a more accurate term.


Riot in the US, post 1992 and especially the last 15 years, has developed a far more narrow meaning and usage then both historically and in most other parts of the world.


https://en.wikipedia.org/Tulsa_Benevolent_Association
Definitionally, a riot is a spontaneous and mostly unorganized* outbreak of 'riotous' behavior, leading to large scale property damage and often fatalities by rioters(sometimes called angry mobs). Riotous behavior. Bottom up and not top down. Something makes a bunch of people angry, they lash out at property and often life. Basic animalistic emotional shit.


(*The violence is initially unorganized. Whatever reason that many people ended up together in the first place, whether for a protest or for a sports game or just because it's a busy part of town might or might not be organized, and some degree of organizational response often occurs in lengthy riots, but the violence against property and person is initially spontaneous and importantly isn't being ordered or planned in detail.).


The US as of late tends to specifically associate riots with violent protests, protests gone wrong, both political parties have reason to back this and this isn't meant to be a call out. One side wants to protect everyone on their side even if they get too violent, the other side wants to demonize everyone on their side even the ones who weren't, they work together to strengthen the association. This is true no matter which direction you read this statements and who you assume I mean to some degree regardless.


https://en.wikipedia.org/African_Blood_Brotherhood
As such, specifically US events, and more specifically hotbed ones to the current relevant topics of the day(in this case, Tulsa and Elaine specifically). I'm going to cite Tulsa as my example here, but most of it also applies to Elaine(albeit I'd say Elaine actually has a stronger argument for fitting Massacre then Tulsa does in at least one way).


Tulsa was a sudden outbreak of riotous behavior. It wasn't planned ahead or ordered top down by generals or fuhrers or el presidentes. It was in response to something(in this case an allegeded assault on a white girl by a black man, probably didn't happen, but the complaint doesn't have to be real, just the emotional reaction), massive emotional reaction by the white community, they respond by taking out their anger on black property and black people. The same basic template applies to a modern riot. People get angry about an event(this could be anything from Lockdowns to George Floyd to Wage Increases to Who Won an Election), they direct their anger at people and property they view as responsible(Doctors and health professionals, racist institutions and white cops, Capitalists and wealthy organizations, people on the other side of the political spectrum and their allies), and property and people associated with that anger get targeted. Also, while it's not often the case, the side doing the 'riotous behavior' USUALLY views themselves as being part of an 'in-group' with the victimized or allegedly victimized party.


https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/02/10/the-tulsa-riot-by-commander-tulsa-post-african-blood-brotherhood-from-the-crusader-vol-4-no-5-july-1921/
This is not an attempt to draw moral equivalence. God. No. This is an attempt to draw linguistic and structural equivalence.


Let's cite some other events Misplaced Pages and the world at large call riots. The Delhi Riots of 84. Prime Minister Gandhi is assassinated by a Sikh body guard. There's our triggering event. People who were aligned with her(ethnic Hindi and political allies in this specific case) got angry and emotional at this event, they will be the ones doing the 'riotous' behavior. Ethnic Sikhs in the city, especially those with known ties to extremist organizations involved in the murder, are our associates that will be the target of the property and person damage. Days of violence follow, hundreds of Sikhs die, thousands of homes and businesses are destroyed. India calls it a riot, Misplaced Pages calls it a riot.


The first link confirms that the KKK chapter in Tulsa was only founded in January 1922, seven months ''after'' the Tulsa riot/massacre.
Or let's say the 1947 Aleppo Riots. We've got some alleged blood libel shit going on(blood libel libel if you will), there's our triggering event, this horrific claim. The cities Jews are the associates to this act who will be on the recieving end. Businesses burned, windows broken, Jews killed, you know the script by now.


The second two links concern the largely forgotten activities of the militant African Blood Brotherhood and its presence in Tulsa in 1921.
Sports riot, team lost, fans angry, other team and their fans get targeted. Prison riot, prisoners upset, prisoners unstable, prisoners get opportunity to break out on mass, they unleash it on the guards and staff. I should also note that well it's anger 99% of the time because...that's the emotion that tends to trigger humans to break shit and hurt people, there are cases(usually sports riots and usually with alcohol involved) where strong positive emotions lead to riotous behavior and property damage, albeit not usually deaths.


Buck Franklin in his autobiography confirms the presence of political agitators in Greenwood although he does not expressly identify them as ABB activists. ] (]) 13:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
And let's finish off with the LA Riots, more modern, less contentious. Rodney King, black man with minor charges, beaten severely by white cops with a known record of racism. Massive black and pro-black backlash, they're the ones with the riot. The LAPD, White Nationalists, people involved in the trial, and anyone SEEN to be supporting them(even if they may not factually be doing so) are going to be on the receiving end this time. Days of property damage and death, largely against police institutions and wealthy white sectors This also triggers counter riots which are absolutely a thing(The initial event here is the first riot, the target is the people viewed as supporting the first riot, so on).


== New 123-page DOJ report. Can this PDF be embedded and made accessible? ==
The Tulsa Race Riot fits the definition perfectly. It fits the template.


News articles:<br>
Massacre tends to carry a far more military and organized connotation, usually(but not always) both. Wounded Knee was not done by angry members of the public, it was done by the US Military. Tianamen Square was done by the Chinese government. Members of the public or non-state groups CAN absolutely do massacres(Beslan Siege is a non-state example. Port Arthur is a good public example), but the burden of planning tends to be viewed slightly higher, and there's OFTEN a degree of backing by state or semi-state actors. ISIS does massacres, see Tikrit. The Tusla Race Riots weren't a planned event. Some actions within may have been planned, but the intial riots were triggered by racial tensions being brought to bursting point when a bunch of white guys got told some white girl had been raped. The fact the military showed up in the final phase of the event to quash it doesn't change that fact. They also showed up in LA92 and Dehli. They weren't planning it or involved on Day 1, they showed up later to clean up the mess.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/11/us/tulsa-race-massacre-report.html<br>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/01/10/tulsa-massacre-report/<br>
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/10/tulsa-race-massacre-report-doj<br>
https://www.publicradiotulsa.org/local-regional/2025-01-10/doj-credible-reports-that-law-enforcement-participated-in-murder-during-race-massacre<br>
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5080213-tulsa-race-massacre-justice-report/


Official links to the Department of Justice report:<br>
I'd also like to bring up the word Pogram here, as it somewhat bridges the gap. Pogram's are generally used to specifically refer to Jewish events(so not an option here, but I do have more to say), and they're usually seperated from Anti-Jewish Riots by the degree of government involvement. If the authorities are specifically the ones fueling and encouraging the riots, ordering them, providing firearms, or directing and planning the event against Jews, it's a pogram. If it's completely down up with the government simply neglecting the situation, that's an anti-Jewish riot. Kristellnacht was a pogram, because despite the best efforts of propaganda at the time to portray this as an organic act by patriotic Germans angry at greedy and corrupt Jewish business owners....it wasn't. Documents reveal the bulk of the damage was done by SS and Paramilirty and the public that was involved often had to be coerced at worst or at best only joined in when they saw a ton of other people dressed like civilians doing it. That's a pogram. I bring this up despite it not being a valid option for Tulsa because I know some people are going to say 'Aleppo wasn't a riot, it was a pogram'. Misplaced Pages has it listed as a riot, so for my argument that's all I need, but I will say the case mostly hinges on whether or not you believe the Syrian State was directly involved in instigating it and sent government forces to back the rioters(which some do, some don't) or whether you think they just neglected the situation. We don't have all the info there, so Riot on the side of caution here.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-results-review-and-evaluation-tulsa-race-massacre<br>
https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/ac-jackson


The 123-page report (PDF document):<br>
That's also why I said Elaine, while still best fitting Riot in my view, as a better argument for something else than Tulsa. There IS evidence of a degree of organization and planning within Elaine that was not present at Tulsa, though again, to what degree is not fully clear and the distinction does matter. And regardless the bulk of the violence was clearly done by the mobs.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1383756/dl


Can this file be embedded and directly included for viewing to the side of the Misplaced Pages article text? ] (]) 16:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Lastly I'd like to counter the claim that calling Tulsa specifically a riot was whitewashing or an effort to blame black people or simply a name designed to hide the event. It wasn't That's how we used the word riot in the US until very recently and that's how historians and most of the world still uses it. We know what the 'blameshifting and whitewashed names' used by people who actually wanted to cover up the events were. "Negroe Insurrection". "Black Uprising". "Planned/General Massacre of Whites" and " Revolution". Shit implying it was either a planned mass murder of whites that was 'foiled' or otherwise tried to portray it as treasonous or Haitian revolution 1804 in the US. Riot was the accurate term used by people who knew what had actually happened, especially in the North. It's what is accurate. Tulsa Race Riot is accurate.
:I've added the report to '''Further reading'''. I don't know of a way to embed it and question whether that's even appropriate. ]&nbsp;] 17:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

:Embedding it here would be inappropriate. But it could live at ? ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh and only these two events got renamed because pop culture brought them up. There were others, others in the US, others with the same target and targetees. Atlanta Race Riot is the bloodiest, but honestly just google around and you'll find a bunch. So I also cite WP:Consistency here. ] (]) 23:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I recommend that the article note that the report released on January 10, 2025, was amended and improved, according to the January 17, 2025 memorandum approved by the Chief, Criminal Section, Civil Rights Division. https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1383756/dl.] (]) 17:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

:You have exerted no leverage in the form of references to the literature on the topic. Modern scholarship will provide the proper style for this article. You might want to give it a rest now, having made your arguments as ] in March, preceded by ] and ] in February. None of these arguments have referred to modern scholarship. ] (]) 04:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
::I'm just proud of myself for getting that all out so clearly honestly ] (]) 23:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

== Inaccurate number of deaths ==

Seems like number of confirmed deaths should be higher, given 120 graves being reported on by AP News: https://apnews.com/article/tulsa-1921-race-massacre-graves-identified-c7cdcd5ca4e54ec27bbb836beae86404

Is this article out of date or is there a reason to have various casualty estimates? ] (]) 20:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 21 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tulsa race massacre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2021.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
[REDACTED] African diaspora High‑importance
[REDACTED] This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconDeath Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDisaster management Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
[REDACTED] Discrimination High‑importance
[REDACTED] This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconOklahoma: Tulsa Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Task-force Tulsa (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States: History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).
It is requested that an image or photograph of Contemporary photo of the Greenwood district and an additional photo of the memorial for the victims of the Tulsa Race Riot be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Oklahoma may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Upload
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa Race Massacre of 1919, No move, April 28, 2017
  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa race massacre, Move reverted, November 20, 2018
  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa race massacre, No consensus, August 8, 2019.
  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa Race Massacre, Request declined, October 15, 2019
  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa Massacre of 1921, Request declined, January 5, 2020
  • RM, Tulsa race riot → Tulsa race massacre, Moved, February 7, 2020
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Section sizes
Section size for Tulsa race massacre (56 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 15,520 15,520
Background 8,169 8,169
Monday, May 30 (Memorial Day) 35 3,481
Encounter in the elevator 2,141 2,141
Brief investigation 1,305 1,305
Tuesday, May 31 21 17,621
Arrest of Rowland 1,756 1,756
Newspaper coverage 3,512 3,512
Stand-off at the courthouse 4,803 4,803
Taking up arms 4,831 4,831
Outbursts of violence 2,698 2,698
Wednesday, June 1 1,360 15,841
Fires begin 2,944 2,944
Daybreak 1,371 1,371
Attack by air 5,406 5,406
Arrival of National Guard troops 4,760 4,760
Aftermath 15 36,824
Casualties 9,899 9,899
Property losses 954 954
Identities of the African American victims 3,424 3,424
Public Safety Committee 856 856
Rebuilding 4,793 4,793
Tulsa Union Depot 4,917 4,917
1921 grand jury investigation 37 6,454
Allegations of corruption 1,476 1,476
John A. Gustafson 4,941 4,941
Breaking the silence 5,512 5,512
Survivors 269 17,088
Olivia Hooker 2,442 2,442
Eldoris McCondichie 2,193 2,193
George Monroe 1,254 1,254
Mary E. Jones Parrish 2,456 2,456
Lessie Benningfield ("Mother Randle") 1,785 1,785
Hal Singer 2,053 2,053
Essie Lee Johnson Beck 1,550 1,550
Vernice Simms 1,543 1,543
Lena Eloise Taylor Butler 1,543 1,543
Tulsa Race Massacre Commission 2,243 2,243
Post-commission actions 29 27,989
Search for mass graves 12,476 12,476
Reconciliation 3,331 3,331
Survivors' lawsuit 2,526 2,526
John Hope Franklin Reconciliation Park 1,474 1,474
Renewed calls for restitution 8,153 8,153
President Biden's 2021 visit 1,249 1,249
Tulsa Historical Society and Museum 1,135 1,135
Present-day Black Wall Street 1,428 1,428
In popular culture 63 13,876
Literature 3,747 3,747
Film and television 7,674 7,674
Music and art 2,392 2,392
See also 797 797
References 289 289
Bibliography 4,909 4,909
Further reading 3,450 3,450
External links 2,778 2,778
Total 174,687 174,687

KKK and ABB

Three links which are of historical relevance are:


https://en.wikipedia.org/Tulsa_Benevolent_Association


https://en.wikipedia.org/African_Blood_Brotherhood


https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/02/10/the-tulsa-riot-by-commander-tulsa-post-african-blood-brotherhood-from-the-crusader-vol-4-no-5-july-1921/


The first link confirms that the KKK chapter in Tulsa was only founded in January 1922, seven months after the Tulsa riot/massacre.

The second two links concern the largely forgotten activities of the militant African Blood Brotherhood and its presence in Tulsa in 1921.

Buck Franklin in his autobiography confirms the presence of political agitators in Greenwood although he does not expressly identify them as ABB activists. 89.243.78.236 (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

New 123-page DOJ report. Can this PDF be embedded and made accessible?

News articles:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/11/us/tulsa-race-massacre-report.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/01/10/tulsa-massacre-report/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/10/tulsa-race-massacre-report-doj
https://www.publicradiotulsa.org/local-regional/2025-01-10/doj-credible-reports-that-law-enforcement-participated-in-murder-during-race-massacre
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5080213-tulsa-race-massacre-justice-report/

Official links to the Department of Justice report:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-results-review-and-evaluation-tulsa-race-massacre
https://www.justice.gov/crt/case/ac-jackson

The 123-page report (PDF document):
https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1383756/dl

Can this file be embedded and directly included for viewing to the side of the Misplaced Pages article text? 172.56.12.167 (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

I've added the report to Further reading. I don't know of a way to embed it and question whether that's even appropriate. Schazjmd (talk) 17:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Embedding it here would be inappropriate. But it could live at Wikisource? --jpgordon 18:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

I recommend that the article note that the report released on January 10, 2025, was amended and improved, according to the January 17, 2025 memorandum approved by the Chief, Criminal Section, Civil Rights Division. https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1383756/dl.Mahoopes (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Tulsa race massacre: Difference between revisions Add topic