Misplaced Pages

Byzantine Empire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:00, 26 November 2015 view source74.124.214.69 (talk) w:pl:Klan Ausran Ku Klux!!! bocian.ugu.pl pingwinojad.blog.pl biblia.webd.pl brutalland.webd.pl FFFvck← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:12, 21 January 2025 view source Matarisvan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions3,059 edits Added Lazaris 2008 to biblio which I had forgotten, incorporated some of Laiou 2002Tag: Visual edit: Switched 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Continuation of the Roman Empire (330–1453)}}
{{About|the medieval Roman empire||Byzantine (disambiguation)}}
{{Redirect|Byzantine}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2012}}
{{protection padlock|small=yes}}
{{EngvarB|date=May 2014}}
{{Featured article}}
{{Infobox former country
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2023}}
|native_name={{lang|grc|Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων}}<br/>''Basileía Rhōmaíōn''{{ref|name_transl|a}}<br />''{{lang|la|Imperium Romanum }}''
{{EngvarB|date=July 2019}}
|conventional_long_name=Byzantine Empire
{{Infobox country
|common_name=Byzantine Empire
|image_coat = JustinianusI.jpg | common_name = Byzantine Empire
| life_span = 330–1453
|symbol_type = ] with the image of ]<br/>(r. 527–565) <small>(see ])</small>
|coa_size = 140px | image_map = Justinian555AD.png
| image_map_caption = The empire in 555 under ], its greatest extent since the fall of the ], with ] in pink
|
|image_map = Justinian555AD.png | capital = ] {{nwr|(modern-day ])}}
| common_languages = {{plainlist}}
|image_map_caption = The Empire at its greatest extent in 555 AD under<br/>] (its ]s in pink)
* ] and ]
|continent = Afroeurasia
* ]
|region = ]
{{end plainlist}}
|
|era = ] to ] | religion = ] (])
|status = Empire | government_type = ]
|government_type = ] ] | title_leader = ]
|event_start = ] | leader1 = ]
| year_leader1 = 306–337
|life_span = {{circa|330}}&nbsp;– 1453{{ref|lifespan|b}}
|year_start = 330 | leader2 = ]
|event_pre = ] | year_leader2 = 379–395
|date_pre = 285 | leader3 = ]
|event1 = Death of ] | year_leader3 = 408–450
|date_event1 = 395 | leader4 = ]
| year_leader4 = 527–565
|event2 = Nominal end of the ]
|date_event2 = 476 | leader5 = ]
|event3 = ] | year_leader5 = 610–641
|date_event3 = 1204 | leader6 = ]
|event4 = Reconquest of Constantinople | year_leader6 = 717–741
|date_event4 = 1261 | leader7 = ]
|event_end = ] | year_leader7 = 976–1025
|year_end = 1453 | leader8 = ]
|date_end = 29 May | year_leader8 = 1081–1118
|event_post = Fall of ] | leader9 = ]
|date_post = 15 August 1461 | year_leader9 = 1143–1180
| leader10 = ]
|
|p1 = Roman Empire | year_leader10 = 1261–1282
|image_p1 = ] | leader11 = ]
|border_p1 = no | year_leader11 = 1449–1453
|s1 = Ottoman Empire | era = ] to {{nwr|]}}
|flag_s1 = Flag of the Ottoman Empire (1453-1844).svg | stat_year1 = 457
|border_s1 = no | stat_pop1 = 16,000,000
<!--

| stat_year2 = 555–450
|capital = ]{{ref|lifespan|b}}<br />{{Coord|41|00|N|28|58|E|region:TR_type:city|display=title}}
| stat_area2 = 2,700,000–2,800,000<ref>{{cite journal |author1-last=Turchin |author1-first=Peter |author2-last=Adams |author2-first=Jonathan M. |author3-last=Hall |author3-first=Thomas D |date=December 2006 |title=East-West Orientation of Historical Empires and Modern States |journal=Journal of World-Systems Research |volume=12 |issue=2 |pp=222–223 |ISSN=1076-156X |doi=10.5195/jwsr.2006.369 |url=https://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/jwsr/article/view/369/381 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200627192448/https://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/jwsr/article/view/369/381 |archive-date=27 June 2020 |access-date=7 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Taagepera |first=Rein |year=1979 |title=Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D. |journal=Social Science History |volume=3 |issue=3/4 |pp=121–122, 124–129, 132–133 |JSTOR=1170959 |url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wf6m5qg |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230409011313/https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wf6m5qg |archive-date=9 April 2023}}.</ref>
|common_languages = {{plainlist}}
-->| stat_year2 = 565
* ] <small>(official until 610)</small>
| stat_pop2 = 26,000,000
* ] <small>(official after 610)</small>
| stat_year3 = 775
|religion = * ]
| stat_pop3 = 7,000,000
* ]<br><small>(] after 311<br>] after 380<br>] after 1054)</small>
| stat_year4 = 1025
|currency = ], ]
| stat_pop4 = 12,000,000
|
|title_leader = ] | stat_year5 = 1320
|leader1 = ] | stat_pop5 = 2,000,000
| currency = ], ], and ]<!--
|year_leader1 = c. 330–337
|leader2 = ] | p1 = Roman Empire
|year_leader2 = 457–474 | p2 = Diocese of Dacia{{!}}'''∟'''Diocese of Dacia
|leader3 = ] | p3 = Diocese of Macedonia{{!}}'''∟'''Diocese of Macedonia
| p4 = Praetorian prefecture of the East{{!}}'''∟'''Praetorian prefecture of the East
|year_leader3 = 527–565
|leader4 = ] | s1 = Ottoman Empire -->
|year_leader4 = 610–641 | demonym = {{plainlist}}
* ]
|leader5 = ]
* Roman
|year_leader5 = 976–1025
{{end plainlist}}
|leader6 = ]
|year_leader6 = 1081–1118
|leader7 = ]
|year_leader7 = 1259–1282
|leader8 = ]
|year_leader8 = 1449–1453
|
|stat_year1 = 565 AD
|stat_area1 =
|stat_pop1 = 26,000,000{{ref|population|c}}
|stat_year2 = 780 AD
|stat_area2 =
|stat_pop2 = 7,000,000
|stat_year3 = 1025 AD
|stat_area3 =
|stat_pop3 = 12,000,000
|stat_year4 = 1143 AD
|stat_area4 =
|stat_pop4 = 10,000,000
|stat_year5 = 1204 AD
|stat_area5 =
|stat_pop5 = 9,000,000
|stat_year6 = 1282 AD
|stat_area6 =
|stat_pop6 = 5,000,000
|
|footnote_a = {{note|name_transl||''{{lang|grc|Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων}}'' may be transliterated in Latin as ''{{transl|grc-Latn|Basileia Rhōmaiōn}}'', meaning ''Roman Empire''.}}
|footnote_b = {{note|lifespan||Between 1204 and 1261 there was an interregnum when the Empire was divided into the ], the ] and the ], which were all contenders for rule of the Empire. The Empire of Nicaea is considered the legitimate continuation of the Byzantine Empire because they managed to re-take Constantinople.}}
|footnote_c = {{note|population||See ] for more detailed figures taken provided by McEvedy and Jones, ''Atlas of World Population History'', 1978, as well as Angeliki E. Laiou, ''The Economic History of Byzantium'', 2002.}}
}} }}
The '''Byzantine Empire''', also referred to as the '''Eastern Roman Empire''', was the continuation of the ] centred in ] during ] and the ]. The eastern half of the Empire survived the conditions that caused the ] in the 5th century{{Nbsp}}AD, and continued to exist until the ] to the ] in 1453. During most of its existence, the empire remained the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in the ]. The term "Byzantine Empire" was only coined following the empire's demise; its citizens referred to the polity as the "Roman Empire" and to themselves as "Romans".{{Efn|{{Langx|grc-x-medieval|Ῥωμαῖοι|Rhōmaîoi}}}} Due to the imperial seat's move from Rome to ], the ], and the predominance of ] instead of ], modern historians continue to make a distinction between the earlier ''Roman Empire'' and the later ''Byzantine Empire''.


During the earlier ] period, the western parts of the empire became ], while the eastern parts largely retained their preexisting ]. This created a dichotomy between the ]. These cultural spheres continued to diverge after ] ({{Reign|324|337}}) moved the capital to Constantinople and legalised ]. Under ] ({{Reign|379|395|lk=no}}), Christianity became the ], and other religious practices ]. Greek gradually replaced Latin for official use as Latin fell into disuse.
The '''Byzantine Empire''', sometimes referred to as the '''Eastern Roman Empire''', was the late antique and medieval continuation of the ] in which the city of ] (proclaimed ]{{refn|The first instance of the designation "New Rome" in an official document is found in the canons of the ] (381), where it is used to justify the claim that the patriarchal seat of Constantinople is second only to that of Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Benz|1963|p=176}}.</ref>|group="n"}} , formerly ]) developed into the capital by 330 AD. It survived the ] in the 5th century AD and continued to exist for an additional thousand years until it ] to the ] in 1453 under the reign of ]. <ref></ref> During most of its existence, the empire was the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in Europe. Both "Byzantine Empire" and "Eastern Roman Empire" are historiographical terms created after the end of the realm; its citizens continued to refer to their empire as the ''Roman Empire'' ({{lang-grc|Βασιλεία τῶν Ῥωμαίων}}, ] {{transl|grc|''Basileia tôn Rhōmaiōn''}}; {{lang-la|Imperium Romanum}}),{{sfn|Kazhdan|Epstein|1985|p=1}} or ''Romania'' ({{lang|grc|Ῥωμανία}}), and to themselves as "Romans".{{sfnm|1a1=Millar|1y=2006|1pp=2, 15|2a1=James|2y=2010|2p=5|3a1=Freeman|3y=1999|3pp=431, 435–437, 459-462|4a1=Baynes|4a2=Moss|4y=1948|4p=xx|5a1=Ostrogorsky|5y=1969|5p=27|6a1=Kaldellis|6y=2007|6pp=2–3|7a1=Kazhdan|7a2=Constable|7y=1982|7p=12|8a1=Norwich|8y=1998|8p=383}}


The empire experienced several cycles of decline and recovery throughout its history, reaching its greatest extent after the fall of the west during the reign of ] ({{Reign|527|565|lk=no}}), who briefly reconquered much of Italy and the western ]. The ] and a ] exhausted the empire's resources; the ] that followed saw the loss of the empire's richest provinces—] and ]—to the ]. In 698, Africa ] to the ], but the empire subsequently stabilised under the ] dynasty. The empire was able to expand once more under the ], experiencing ]. This growth came to an end in 1071 after the defeat by the ] at the ]. Thereafter, periods of civil war and Seljuk incursion resulted in the loss of most of ]. The empire recovered during the ], and Constantinople remained the largest and wealthiest city in Europe until the 13th century.
Several events from the 4th to 6th centuries mark the period of transition during which the Roman Empire's ] divided. Under ] (r. 379–395), ] became the Empire's official ] and others such as ] were ]. And finally, under the reign of ] (r. 610–641), the Empire's military and administration were restructured and adopted Greek for official use instead of Latin.{{sfnm|Ostrogorsky|1969|1pp=105–107, 109|Norwich|1998|2p=97|Haywood|2001|3pp=2.17, 3.06, 3.15}} Thus, although it continued the Roman state and maintained Roman state traditions, modern historians distinguish ] from ] insofar as it was oriented towards Greek rather than Latin culture, and characterised by ] rather than ].{{sfnm|1a1=Millar|1y=2006|1pp=2, 15|2a1=James|2y=2010|2p=5|3a1=Freeman|3y=1999|3pp=431, 435–437, 459–462|4a1=Baynes|4a2=Moss|4y=1948|4p=xx|5a1=Ostrogorsky|5y=1969|5p=27|6a1=Kaldellis|6y=2007|6pp=2–3|7a1=Kazhdan|7a2=Constable|7y=1982|7p=12|8a1=Norwich|8y=1998|8p=383}}


The empire was largely dismantled in 1204, following the ] by Latin armies at the end of the ]; its former territories ] into competing Greek ]s and ]. Despite the eventual ] in 1261, the reconstituted empire wielded only regional power during its final two centuries of existence. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in ] fought throughout the 14th and 15th centuries. The ] to the Ottomans in 1453 ultimately brought the empire to an end. Many refugees who had fled the city after its capture settled in Italy and throughout Europe, helping to ignite the ]. The fall of Constantinople is sometimes used to mark the dividing line between the Middle Ages and the ].
The borders of the Empire evolved significantly over its existence, as it went through several cycles of decline and recovery. During the reign of ] (r. 527–565), the Empire reached its greatest extent after reconquering much of the historically Roman western ], including North Africa, Italy, and Rome itself, which it held for two more centuries. During the reign of ] (r. 582–602), the Empire's eastern frontier was expanded and the north stabilised. However, his assassination caused the ], which exhausted the Empire's resources and contributed to major territorial losses during the ] of the seventh century. In a matter of years the Empire lost its richest provinces, Egypt and Syria, to the Arabs.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iSWPAgAAQBAJ |title=Warfare, State And Society In The Byzantine World 560–1204 |work= |page=47}}</ref>


During the ] (10th–11th centuries), the Empire again expanded and experienced the two-century long ], which came to an end with the loss of much of Asia Minor to the ] after the ] in 1071. This battle opened the way for the Turks to settle in ] as a homeland.

The final centuries of the Empire exhibited a general trend of decline. By the 12th century<ref>Rosenberg, Matt. "Largest cities through history." About.com.</ref> Constantinople was the largest and wealthiest European city.<ref>Pounds, Norman John Greville. ''An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500–1840'', p. 124. CUP Archive, 1979. ISBN 0-521-22379-2.</ref> The Empire struggled to ], but was delivered a mortal blow during the ], when Constantinople was sacked in 1204 and the territories that the Empire formerly governed ] into competing Byzantine Greek and ]. Despite the eventual ] in 1261, the Byzantine Empire remained only one of several small rival states in the area for the final two centuries of its existence. Its remaining territories were ] over the 15th century. The ] to the ] in 1453 finally ended the Byzantine Empire.<ref>http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/EndByz.html</ref>
== Nomenclature == == Nomenclature ==
{{see also|Names of the Greeks}} {{See also|Names of the Greeks}}
] klivanium (Κλιβάνιον) - a predecessor of Ottoman krug ]]]


The inhabitants of the empire, now generally termed ], thought of themselves as ] ({{transliteration|grc|Romaioi}}). Their Islamic neighbours similarly called their empire the "land of the Romans" ({{transliteration|ar|Bilād al-Rūm}}), but the people of medieval Western Europe preferred to call them "Greeks" ({{lang|la|Graeci}}), due to having a contested legacy to Roman identity and to associate negative connotations from ancient Latin literature.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=2|2a1=Aschenbrenner|2a2=Ransohoff|2y=2022a|2pp=1–2|3a1=Cormack|3a2=Haldon| 3a3=Jeffreys|3y=2008|3pp=8–9}} The adjective "Byzantine", which derived from ] (Latinised as {{lang|la|Byzantium}}), the name of the Greek settlement ] was established on, was only used to describe the inhabitants of that city; it did not refer to the empire, which they called {{transliteration|grc|Romanía}}—"Romanland".{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2022|1pp=349–351|2a1=Cormack |2a2=Haldon|2a3=Jeffreys|2y=2008|2p=4}}
The first use of the term "Byzantine" to label the later years of the ] was in 1557, when the German historian ] published his work ''Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ'', a collection of historical sources. The term comes from "Byzantium", the name of the city of Constantinople before it became Constantine's capital. This older name of the city would rarely be used from this point onward except in historical or poetic contexts. The publication in 1648 of the ''Byzantine du Louvre'' ('']''), and in 1680 of ]'s ''Historia Byzantina'' further popularised the use of "Byzantine" among French authors, such as ].<ref>Fox, ; {{harvnb|Rosser|2011|p=1}}</ref> However, it was not until the mid-19th century that the term came into general use in the Western world.<ref>{{harvnb|Rosser|2011|p=2}}.</ref>


After the empire's fall, ] scholars referred to the empire by many names, including the "Empire of Constantinople", the "Empire of the Greeks", the "Eastern Empire", the "Late Empire", the "Low Empire", and the "Roman Empire".{{sfn|Aschenbrenner|Ransohoff|2022a|p=2}} The increasing use of "Byzantine" and "Byzantine Empire" likely started with the 15th-century historian ], whose works were widely propagated, notably by ]. "Byzantine" was used adjectivally alongside terms such as "Empire of the Greeks" until the 19th century.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2022|pp=352–357}} It is now the primary term, used to refer to all aspects of the empire; however, some modern historians believe that, as an originally prejudicial and inaccurate term, it should not be used.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=2–3|2a1=Cormack|2a2=Haldon|2a3=Jeffreys|2y=2008|2p=4}}
The Byzantine Empire was known to its inhabitants as the "Roman Empire", the "Empire of the Romans" (Latin: ''Imperium Romanum'', ''Imperium Romanorum''; Greek: {{lang|grc|Βασιλεία τῶν Ῥωμαίων}} ''Basileia tōn Rhōmaiōn'', {{lang|grc|Ἀρχὴ τῶν Ῥωμαίων}} ''Archē tōn Rhōmaiōn''), "Romania" (Latin: ''Romania''; Greek: {{lang|grc|Ῥωμανία}} ''Rhōmania''),{{refn|"Romania" was a popular name of the empire used mainly unofficially, which meant "land of the Romans".<ref>{{harvnb|Fossier|Sondheimer|1997|p=104}}.</ref> After 1081, it occasionally appears in official Byzantine documents as well. In 1204, the leaders of the Fourth Crusade gave the name ''Romania'' to the newly founded Latin Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Wolff|1948|pp=5–7, 33–34}}.</ref> The term does not refer to modern ].|group="n"}} the "Roman Republic" (Latin: ''Res Publica Romana''; Greek: {{lang|grc|Πολιτεία τῶν Ῥωμαίων}} ''Politeia tōn Rhōmaiōn''), ''Graikia'' (Greek: Γραικία), and also as ''Rhōmais'' (Greek: {{lang|grc|Ῥωμαΐς}}).<ref>{{harvnb|Cinnamus|1976|p=240}}; ], ''Epistulae'', 145, line 19 ("ἡ ταπεινὴ Γραικία"), and 458, line 28 ("ἐν Ἀρμενίᾳ καὶ Γραικίᾳ").</ref> The inhabitants called themselves ''Romaioi'' and ''Graikoi'', and even as late as the 19th century Greeks typically referred to their modern language as '']'' and '']''.

Although the Byzantine Empire had a multi-ethnic character during most of its history<ref>{{harvnb|Ahrweiler|Laiou|1998|p=3}}; {{harvnb|Mango|2002|p=13}}.</ref> and preserved ] traditions,<ref>{{harvnb|Gabriel|2002|p=277}}.</ref> it became identified by its western and northern contemporaries with its increasingly predominant ].<ref>{{harvnb|Ahrweiler|Laiou|1998|p=vii}}; {{harvnb|Davies|1996|p=245}}; {{harvnb|Gross|1999|p=45}}; {{harvnb|Lapidge|Blair|Keynes|1998|p=79}}; {{harvnb|Millar|2006|pages=2, 15}}; {{harvnb|Moravcsik|1970|pp=11–12}}; {{harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|pp=28, 146}}; {{harvnb|Browning|1983|p=113}}.</ref> The occasional use of the term "Empire of the Greeks" (Latin: ''Imperium Graecorum'') in the West to refer to the Eastern Roman Empire and of the Byzantine Emperor as ''Imperator Graecorum'' (Emperor of the Greeks)<ref>{{harvnb|Klein|2004|p=290 (Note #39)}}; '']'', 389: "Mense lanuario c. epiphaniam Basilii, Graecorum imperatoris, legati cum muneribus et epistolis ad Hludowicum regem Radasbonam venerunt&nbsp;...".</ref> were also used to separate it from the prestige of the Roman Empire within the new kingdoms of the West.<ref>{{harvnb|Fouracre|Gerberding|1996|p=345}}: "The Frankish court no longer regarded the Byzantine Empire as holding valid claims of universality; instead it was now termed the 'Empire of the Greeks'."</ref>

The authority of the Byzantine emperor as the legitimate Roman emperor was challenged by the coronation of ] as ] by ] in the year 800. Needing Charlemagne's support in his struggle against his enemies in Rome, Leo used the lack of a male occupant of the throne of the Roman Empire at the time to claim that it was vacant and that he could therefore crown a new Emperor himself.<ref>{{harvnb|Garland|1999|p=87}}.</ref> Whenever the Popes or the rulers of the West made use of the name ''Roman'' to refer to the Eastern Roman Emperors, they usually preferred the term ''Imperator Romaniae'' (meaning ''Emperor of Romania'') instead of ''Imperator Romanorum'' (meaning ''Emperor of the Romans''), a title that they applied only to Charlemagne and his successors.{{refn|In a Latin chronicle of 1190 (''Continuatio Cremifanensis''), Isaac Angelos is referred as "Imperator Romaniae" and ] as "Imperator Romanorum". However, some years earlier, in 1169, a Genoese envoy named Amico de Murta, in his oath taken in Constantinople on behalf of the Genoese, had referred to Manuel Komnenos as "Imperator Romanorum". After 1204, the terms "Imperium Romaniae" and "Imperator Romaniae" were used by the Westerners to describe the Latin Empire and its emperors respectively.<ref>{{harvnb|Wolff|1948|pp=11, 27–28}}.</ref>|group="n"}}

No such distinction existed in the Islamic and Slavic worlds, where the Empire was more straightforwardly seen as the continuation of the Roman Empire. In the Islamic world, the Roman Empire was known primarily as '']''.<ref>{{harvnb|Tarasov|Milner-Gulland|2004|p=121}}; {{harvnb|El-Cheikh|2004|p=22}}</ref> The name ], or "''Roman nation,''" was used by the Ottomans through the 20th century to refer to the former subjects of the Byzantine Empire, that is, the ] community within Ottoman realms.


== History == == History ==
{{main|History of the Byzantine Empire}} {{Main|History of the Byzantine Empire}}
As the historiographical ]s of "]", "]", and "Byzantine history" significantly overlap, there is no consensus on a "foundation date" for the Byzantine Empire, if there was one at all. The growth of the study of "late antiquity" has led to some historians setting a start date in the seventh or eighth centuries.{{sfnm|Cameron|2002|1pp=190–191|Kaldellis|2015}} Others believe a "new empire" began during changes in {{circa|300}}{{Nbsp}}AD.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=34|Shepard|2009|2p=22}} Still others hold that these starting points are too early or too late, and instead begin {{circa|500}}.{{sfn|Shepard|2009|p=26}} Geoffrey Greatrex believes that it is impossible to precisely date the foundation of the Byzantine Empire.{{sfn|Greatrex|2008|p=232}}


=== Early history === === Early history (pre-518) ===
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Constantinian and Valentinianic dynasties|Byzantine Empire under the Theodosian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Leonid dynasty}}
]'s pupils (1520–1524, ], Vatican City, ]); ] records that (as ]) Constantine delayed receiving ] until shortly before his death<ref>Eusebius, IV, .</ref>]]
The ] succeeded in conquering many territories covering the entire Mediterranean region and coastal regions in ] and north Africa. These territories were home to many different cultural groups, both urban populations and rural populations. Generally speaking, the eastern Mediterranean provinces were more urbanised than the western, having previously been united under the ] and ] by the influence of Greek culture.<ref name="Ostrogorsky 1959 21">{{harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1959|p=21}}; {{harvnb|Wells|1922|loc=Chapter 33}}.</ref>


] under the ] system established by ].|alt=A map showing the division of the Roman empire {{circa|300}}]]
The West also suffered more heavily from the instability of the 3rd century AD. This distinction between the established Hellenised East and the younger Latinised West persisted and became increasingly important in later centuries, leading to a gradual estrangement of the two worlds.<ref name="Ostrogorsky 1959 21"/>
In a series of conflicts between the third and first centuries{{Nbsp}}BC, the ] gradually established hegemony over the ], while ] ultimately transformed into the one-person rule of ]. The ] enjoyed a period of ] until ], when a combination of external threats and internal instabilities caused the Roman state to splinter as regional armies acclaimed their generals as "soldier-emperors".{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=233|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=16–17|Treadgold|1997|3pp=4–7}} One of these, ] ({{reign|284|305}}), seeing that the state was too big to be ruled by one man, attempted to fix the problem by instituting a ], or rule of four, and dividing the empire into eastern and western halves. Although the Tetrarchy system quickly failed, the division of the empire proved an enduring concept.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=233–235|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=17–18|Treadgold|1997|3pp=14–18}}


]'s reforms significantly altered governmental structure, reach and taxation, and these reforms also had the effect of downgrading the first capital, ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=20-21, 34|Treadgold|1997|2pp=39, 45, 85|Rotman|2022|3pp=41–43|Greatrex|2008|3p=234–235}} ] ({{reign|306|337}}) secured sole power in 324. Over the following six years, he rebuilt the city of ] as a ], which was renamed ]. Rome was further from the important eastern provinces and in a less strategically important location; it was not esteemed by the "soldier-emperors" who ruled from the frontiers or by the empire's population who, ], considered themselves "Roman".{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=335|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=16–20|Treadgold|1997|3pp=39–40}} Constantine extensively reformed the empire's military and civil administration and instituted the ] as a stable currency.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=335–337|Kaldellis|2023|2loc=chapter 2|Treadgold|1997|3p=40}} He favoured ], which ] in 312.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=336–337|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=81–84|Treadgold|1997|3pp=31–33, 40–47}}
=== Decentralization of power ===
{{See also|Byzantium under the Constantinian and Valentinian dynasties}}
To maintain control and improve administration, various schemes to divide the work of the Roman Emperor by sharing it between individuals were tried between 285 and 324, from 337 to 350, from 364 to 392, and again between 395 and 480. Although the administrative subdivisions varied, they generally involved a division of labour between East and West. Each division was a form of power-sharing (or even job-sharing), for the ultimate ''imperium'' was not divisible and therefore the empire remained legally one state—although the co-emperors often saw each other as rivals or enemies.


Constantine's dynasty fought ] against ] and ended in 363 after the death of his son-in-law ].{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=337–338|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=92–99, 106–111|Treadgold|1997|3pp=52–62}} The short ], occupied with ], religious debates, and anti-corruption campaigns, ended in the East after the death of ] at the ] in 378.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=239–240|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=114–118, 121–123|Treadgold|1997|3pp=63–67}}
In 293, emperor ] created a new administrative system (the ]), to guarantee security in all endangered regions of his Empire. He associated himself with a co-emperor ('']''), and each co-emperor then adopted a young colleague given the title of '']'', to share in their rule and eventually to succeed the senior partner. The tetrarchy collapsed, however, in 313 and a few years later Constantine I reunited the two administrative divisions of the Empire as sole Augustus.<ref name="Kuhoff">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Kuhoff|2002|pp=177–178}}.</ref>


]
=== Recentralisation ===
Valens's successor, ] ({{reign|379|395}}), restored political stability in the east by allowing the ] to settle in Roman territory;{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=240|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=128–129|Treadgold|1997|3p=73}} he also twice intervened in the western half, defeating the usurpers ] and ] in 388 and 394 respectively.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=241|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=129–137|Treadgold|1997|3pp=74–75}} He ], confirmed the primacy of ] over ], and established ].{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=240–241|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=126–128|Treadgold|1997|3pp=71–74}} He was the last emperor to rule both the western and eastern halves of the empire;{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=136}} after his death, the West was destabilised by a succession of "soldier-emperors", unlike the East, where administrators continued to hold power. ] ({{reign|408|450}}) largely left the rule of the east to officials such as ], who constructed the ] to defend Constantinople, now firmly entrenched as Rome's capital.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=242|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=165–167|Treadgold|1997|3pp=87–90}}
In 330, ] moved the ] to ], which he founded as a second Rome on the site of Byzantium, a city strategically located on the trade routes between Europe and Asia and between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Constantine introduced important changes into the Empire's military, monetary, civil and religious institutions. As regards his economic policies in particular, he has been accused by certain scholars of "reckless fiscality", but the gold ] he introduced became a stable currency that transformed the economy and promoted development.<ref name="esler-1081">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Esler|2004|p=1081}}; {{harvnb|Gibbon|1906|loc=Volume III, Part IV, Chapter 18, p. 168}}; {{harvnb|Teall|1967|pp=13,19–23, 25, 28–30, 35–36}}</ref>


Theodosius' reign was marked by the theological dispute over ], which was eventually deemed ], and by the formulation of the '']'' law code.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=242|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=172–178|Treadgold|1997|3pp=91–92, 96–99|Shepard|2009|4p=23}} It also saw the arrival of ]'s ], who ravaged the ] and exacted a massive ] from the empire; Attila however switched his attention to the ], and his people fractured after his death in 453.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=242–243|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=193–196, 200|Treadgold|1997|3pp=94–95, 98}} After ] ({{reign|457|474}}) failed in his ] the west, the warlord ] deposed ] in 476, killed his titular successor ] in 480, and the office of western emperor was formally abolished.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1pp=243–244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=209, 214–215|Treadgold|1997|3pp=153, 158–159}}
Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state, but enjoyed imperial preference, because ]. Constantine established the principle that emperors could not settle questions of doctrine on their own, but should summon instead ] for that purpose. His convening of both the ] and the ] indicated his interest in the unity of the Church, and showcased his claim to be its head.<ref name="B163">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Drake|1995|p=5}}; {{harvnb|Grant|1975|pp=4, 12}}.</ref> The rise of Christianity was briefly interrupted on the accession of the emperor ] in 361, who made a determined effort to restore polytheism throughout the empire and was thus dubbed "Julian the Apostate" by the Church.<ref>{{harvnb|Bowersock|1997|p=79}}</ref> However this was reversed when Julian was killed in battle in 363.<ref>{{harvnb|Greatrex|Lieu|2002|p=1}}</ref>


Through a combination of luck, cultural factors, and political decisions, the Eastern empire never suffered from rebellious barbarian vassals and was never ruled by barbarian warlords—the problems which ensured the downfall of the West.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=243–246}} ] ({{reign|474|491}}) convinced the problematic ] king ] to take control of Italy from Odoacer, which he did; dying when the empire was at peace, Zeno was succeeded by ] ({{reign|491|518}}).{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=220–221|Treadgold|1997|3pp=162–164}} Although his ] brought occasional issues, Anastasius was a capable administrator and instituted several successful financial reforms including the abolition of the ]. He was the first emperor, since Diocletian, who did not face any serious problems affecting his empire.{{sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=244|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=223–226|Treadgold|1997|3pp=164–173}}
]
] (379-395) was the last Emperor to rule both the Eastern and Western halves of the Empire. In 391 and 392 he ]. Pagan festivals and sacrifices were banned, as was access to all pagan temples and places of worship.<ref>{{harvnb|Friell|Williams|2005|p=105}}</ref> The last ] are believed to have been held in 393.<ref>{{harvnb|Perrottet|2004|p=190}}</ref> In 395, ] bequeathed the imperial office jointly to his sons: ] in the East and ] in the West, once again dividing Imperial administration. In the 5th century the Eastern part of the empire was largely spared the difficulties faced by the West—due in part to a more established urban culture and greater financial resources, which allowed it to placate invaders with ] and pay foreign mercenaries. This success allowed ] to focus on the ] and further fortification of ], which left the city impervious to most attacks until 1204.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=54, 111, 153}}.</ref> Large portions of the ] are preserved to the present day.


=== 518–717 ===
To fend off the ], Theodosius had to pay an enormous annual tribute to ]. His successor, ], refused to continue to pay the tribute, but Attila had already diverted his attention to the ]. After his death in 453, the ] collapsed, and many of the remaining Huns were often hired as mercenaries by Constantinople.<ref>{{harvnb|Alemany|2000|p=207}}; {{harvnb|Bayless|1976|pp=176–177}}; {{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=184, 193}}.</ref>
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty}}
{{Multiple image
| perrow = 2
| align = right
| image1 = Mosaic of Justinianus I - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg
| alt1 = A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden colored background. The person has a dark brown cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, three jewels on his right shoulder, a crown with two pendants each hanging from both ends and an aura like circle around his head
| image2 = Belisarius mosaic.jpg
| alt2 = A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden colored background. The person has a white cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, an embroidered pattern on his right shoulder, wavy hair, a stubble beard and a moustache
| footer = Emperor ] (''left''), and the general ] (''right''). ]s, 6th century, from the ], Ravenna, Italy
| direction =
| total_width = 270
}}
<!--The Acacian schism should be discussed in the Religion section. Whether the renovatio imperii existed at all is not within the scope of this article.-->


The reign of ] was a watershed in Byzantine history.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=250|Louth|2009a|2p=106|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=257–258|Treadgold|1997|4p=174}} Following his accession in 527, the law-code was rewritten as the influential '']'' and Justinian produced extensive legislation on provincial administration;{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=108–109|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=269–271|Sarris|2002|3p=45|Treadgold|1997|4pp=178–180}} he reasserted imperial control over religion and morality through purges of non-Christians and "deviants";{{sfnm|Sarris|2002|1pp=43–45|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=271–274|Louth|2009a|3pp=114–119}} and having ruthlessly subdued ] he rebuilt much of Constantinople, including the original ].{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=111–114|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=274–277|Sarris|2002|3p=46}} Justinian took advantage of political instability in Italy to attempt the reconquest of lost western territories. The ] in North Africa ] by the general ], who ]; the ] was destroyed in 554.{{sfnm|Sarris|2002|1p=46|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=279–283, 287–288, 305–307|Moorhead|2009|3pp=202–209}}
=== Loss of the Western Roman Empire ===
] ''(west)'' in 460 AD. Roman rule in the west would last less than two more decades, whereas the territory of the east would remain static until the reconquests of Justinian I.]]
After the fall of Attila, the Eastern Empire enjoyed a period of peace, while the ] deteriorated due to continuing migration and expansion by the ] (its end is usually dated in 476 when the Germanic Roman general ] deposed the usurper Western Emperor ]<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=52}}.</ref>).


In the 540s, however, Justinian began to suffer reversals on multiple fronts. Taking advantage of Constantinople's preoccupation with the West, ] of the ] invaded Byzantine territory and sacked ] in 540.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=297|Treadgold|1997|2pp=193–194|Haldon|2008a|3pp=252–253}} Meanwhile, the emperor's internal reforms and policies began to falter, not helped by ] that killed a large proportion of the population and severely weakened the empire's social and financial stability.{{sfnm|Sarris|2002|1p=49|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=298–301}} The most difficult period of the Ostrogothic war, against their king ], came during this decade, while divisions among Justinian's advisors undercut the administration's response.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=196–207|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=298–299, 305–306|Moorhead|2009|3pp=207–208}} He also did not fully heal the divisions in ], as the ] failed to make a real difference.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=210–211, 214|Louth|2009a|2pp=117–118|Haldon|2008a|3p=253}} Justinian died in 565; his reign saw more success than that of any other Byzantine emperor, yet he left his empire under massive strain.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=318–319|Treadgold|1997|2p=217|Sarris|2002|3p=51}}
In 480 with the death of the Western Emperor ], Eastern Emperor ] became sole Emperor of the empire. Odoacer, now ruler of Italy, was nominally Zeno's subordinate but acted with complete autonomy, eventually providing support to a rebellion against the Emperor.<ref name="Burns 1991 65, 76–77, 86–87">{{harvnb|Burns|1991|pp=65, 76–77, 86–87}}</ref>


Financially and territorially overextended, ] ({{reign|565|578}}) was soon at war on many fronts. The ], fearing the aggressive ], conquered much of northern Italy by 572.{{sfnm|Sarris|2002|1p=51|Haldon|2008a|2p=254|Treadgold|1997|3pp=220–222}} The ] that year, and continued until the emperor ] finally emerged victorious in 591; by that time, the Avars and ], causing great instability.{{sfnm|Louth|2009a|1pp=124–127|Haldon|2008a|2p=254|Sarris|2002|3p=51}} Maurice ] during the 590s, but although he managed to re-establish Byzantine control up to the ], he pushed his troops too far in 602—they mutinied, proclaimed an officer named ] as emperor, and executed Maurice.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=336–338|Treadgold|1997|2pp=232–235|Haldon|2008a|3p=254}} The Sasanians seized their moment and ]; Phocas was unable to cope and soon faced ] led by ]. Phocas lost Constantinople in 610 and was soon executed, but the destructive civil war accelerated the empire's decline.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=347–350|Haldon|2008a|2p=254|Louth|2009b|3pp=226–227|Treadgold|1997|4p=241}}
Zeno negotiated with the invading ], who had settled in ], convincing the Gothic king ] to depart for Italy as ''magister militum per Italiam'' ("commander in chief for Italy") with the aim of deposing Odoacer. By urging Theodoric to conquer Italy, Zeno rid the Eastern Empire of an unruly subordinate (Odoacer) and moved another (Theodoric) further from the heart of the Empire. After Odoacer's defeat in 493, Theodoric ruled Italy on his own, although he was never recognised by the eastern emperors as "king" (''rex'').<ref name="Burns 1991 65, 76–77, 86–87"/>


{{multiple image
In 491, ], an aged civil officer of Roman origin, became Emperor, but it was not until 497 that the forces of the new emperor effectively took the measure of ].<ref>{{harvnb|Lenski|1999|pp=428–429}}.</ref> Anastasius revealed himself as an energetic reformer and an able administrator. He perfected Constantine I's coinage system by definitively setting the weight of the copper '']'', the coin used in most everyday transactions.<ref>{{harvnb|Grierson|1999|p=17}}.</ref> He also reformed the tax system and permanently abolished the ] tax. The State Treasury contained the enormous sum of {{convert|320,000|lbs|kg|abbr=on}} of gold when Anastasius died in 518.<ref>{{harvnb|Postan|Miller|Postan|1987|p=140}}.</ref>
| align = left
| direction = vertical
| width = 270
| image1 = The Sasanian Empire at its apex under Khosrow II-es.svg
| alt1 = A map centred on West Asia, with the territories controlled by the Sassanian Empire colored light brown. All of modern day Iran, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Syria, Iraq, Israel, Palestine; southern Yemen, northern Arabia and Egypt along with a bulge through Turkey are colored light brown
| image2 = Walls of Constantinople.JPG
| alt2 = A photograph of a large double-layered fortification.
| footer = '''Top:''' the ] at its territorial apex under ]<br />'''Bottom:''' the ] of Constantinople, critically important during the ].
}}


Under ], the Sassanids occupied the ] and Egypt and pushed into Asia Minor, while Byzantine control of Italy slipped and the Avars and Slavs ran riot in the Balkans.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1pp=254–255|Treadgold|1997|2pp=287–293|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=351–355}} Although Heraclius repelled ] in 626 and ] in 627, this was a ].{{sfnm|Sarris|2002|1pp=56–58|Haldon|2008a|2p=255|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=364–367, 369, 372|Louth|2009b|4pp=227–229|Treadgold|1997|5pp=397–400}} The ] soon saw the conquest of ], ], and ] by the newly-formed Arabic ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=375|Haldon|2008a|2p=256|Louth|2009b|3pp=229–230}} By Heraclius' death in 641, the empire had been severely reduced economically as well as territorially—the loss of the wealthy eastern provinces had deprived Constantinople of three-quarters of its revenue.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=387|Haldon|2008a|2p=256|Treadgold|2002|3p=129}}
=== Justinian Dynasty ===
{{see also|Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty}}
] depicted on one of the famous mosaics of the ], ].]]
], Justinian's wife, depicted on the mosaics of the ], ].]]


The next seventy-five years are poorly documented.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=387}} ] began almost immediately, and the Byzantines resorted to holding fortified centres and avoiding battle at all costs; although it was invaded annually, Anatolia avoided permanent Arab occupation.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=257|Kaldellis|2023|2p=387}} The outbreak of the ] in 656 gave Byzantium breathing space, which it used wisely: some order was restored in the Balkans by ] ({{reign|641|668}}),{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=389|Louth|2009b|2pp=230–231}} who began the administrative reorganisation known as the "]", in which troops were allocated to defend specific provinces.{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=315–316|Louth|2009b|2pp=239–240}} With the help of the recently rediscovered ], ] ({{reign|668|685}}) repelled the Arab efforts to ],{{sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=323–327|Haldon|2008a|2p=257|Louth|2009b|3pp=232–233}} but suffered ] against the ], who soon established ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=403|Haldon|2008a|2pp=257–258|Treadgold|2002|3pp=134–135}} Nevertheless, he and Constans had done enough to secure the empire's position, especially as the ] was undergoing ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=403|Treadgold|2002|2p=135}}
The Justinian dynasty was founded by ], who though illiterate, rose through the ranks of the military to become Emperor in 518.<ref>{{harvnb|Chapman|1971|p=210}}</ref> He was succeeded by his nephew ] in 527, who may already have exerted effective control during Justin's reign.<ref name="M290">{{harvnb|Meier|2003|p=290}}.</ref> One of the most important figures of late antiquity and possibly the last Roman emperor to speak Latin as a first language,<ref>{{harvnb|Wickham|2009|p=90}}</ref> Justinian's rule constitutes a distinct epoch, marked by the ambitious but only partly realized ''renovatio imperii'', or "restoration of the Empire".<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=17}}</ref> His wife ] was particularly influential.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=104}}</ref>


] sought to build on the stability secured by his father Constantine but was overthrown in 695 after attempting to exact too much from his subjects; over the next twenty-two years, six more rebellions followed in ].{{sfnm|Treadgold|2002|1pp=136–138|Haldon|2008a|2p=257|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=438–440}} The reconstituted caliphate sought to break Byzantium by taking Constantinople, but the newly crowned ] managed to ], the first major setback of the Muslim conquests.{{sfnm|Treadgold|2002|1pp=137–138|Haldon|2008a|2p=257|Auzépy|2009|3p=265}}
In 529, Justinian appointed a ten-man commission chaired by ] to revise Roman law and create a new codification of laws and jurists' extracts, known as the "'']''". In 534, the ''Corpus'' was updated and, along with the ], formed the system of law used for most of the rest of the Byzantine era.<ref>{{harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=150}}.</ref> The ''Corpus'' forms the basis of ] of many modern states.<ref>{{harvnb|Merryman|Perez-Perdomo|2007|p=7}}</ref>


=== 718–867 ===
In 532, attempting to secure his eastern frontier, Justinian signed a peace treaty with ] agreeing to pay a large annual tribute to the ]. In the same year, he survived a revolt in Constantinople (the ]), which solidified his power but ended with the deaths of a reported 30,000 to 35,000 rioters on his orders.<ref>{{harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=137}}; {{harvnb|Meier|2003|pp=297–300}}.</ref> The western conquests began in 533, as Justinian sent his general ] to reclaim the former province of ] from the ] who had been in control since 429 with their capital at Carthage.<ref>{{harvnb|Gregory|2010|p=145}}.</ref> Their success came with surprising ease, but it was not until 548 that the major local tribes were subdued.<ref name="Ev">{{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=xxv}}.</ref> In ], the deaths of Theodoric, his nephew and heir ], and his daughter ] had left her murderer, ] (r. 534–536), on the throne despite his weakened authority.<ref name="B180-216">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Evans|2005|pp=xxvi, 76}}.</ref>
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Nikephorian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Amorian dynasty}}] (left), and his son and heir, ] (right)|alt=Two gold coins, each depicting a man]]
Leo and his son ] ({{reign|741|775}}), two of the most capable Byzantine emperors, withstood continued Arab attacks, civil unrest, and natural disasters, and reestablished the state as a major regional power.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1pp=258–259|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=443, 451–452|Auzépy|2009|3pp=255–260}} Leo's reign produced the '']'', a new code of law to succeed that of Justinian II,{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=444–445|Auzépy|2009|2pp=275–276}} and continued to reform the "theme system" in order to lead offensive campaigns against the Muslims, culminating in ].{{sfnm|Auzépy|2009|1pp=265–273|Kaegi|2009|2pp=385–385|Kaldellis|2023|3p=450}} Constantine overcame an early civil war against his brother-in-law ], made peace with the new ], ] against the Bulgars, and continued to make administrative and military reforms.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=260|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=450–454|Treadgold|2002|3pp=140–141}} However, due to both emperors' support for the ], which opposed the use of ], they were later vilified by Byzantine historians;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=443, 447–449, 454–459|Haldon|2008a|2pp=258–261|Auzépy|2009|3pp=253–254}} Constantine's reign also saw the loss of ] to the ], and the beginning of a split with the ].{{sfnm|Treadgold|2002|1pp=140–141|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=459–561|Auzépy|2009|3pp=284–287}}


In 780, Empress ] assumed power on behalf of her son ].{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=261|Treadgold|2002|2pp=141–142|Magdalino|2002|3p=170}} Although she was a capable administrator who temporarily resolved the iconoclasm controversy,{{sfnm|Haldon|2008a|1p=261|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=464–469}} the empire was destabilized by her feud with her son. The Bulgars and Abbasids meanwhile inflicted numerous defeats on the Byzantine armies, and the papacy crowned ] as Roman emperor in 800.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=470–473|Magdalino|2002|2pp=169–171|Haldon|2008a|3p=261}} In 802, the unpopular Irene was overthrown by ]; he reformed the empire's administration but died ] in 811.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=473–474, 478–481}} Military defeats and societal disorder, especially the resurgence of iconoclasm, characterised the next eighteen years.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=265|Auzépy|2009|2pp=257, 259, 289|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=482–483, 485–491}}
In 535, a small Byzantine expedition to ] met with easy success, but the Goths soon stiffened their resistance, and victory did not come until 540, when Belisarius captured ], after successful sieges of ] and Rome.<ref name="B180-216"/> In 535–536, Theodahad sent ] to Constantinople to request the removal of Byzantine forces from Sicily, ], and Italy. Although Agapetus failed in his mission to sign a peace with Justinian, he succeeded in having the ] ] denounced, despite empress ]'s support and protection.<ref name=Maas278T187>{{harvnb|Sotinel|2005|p=278}}; {{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|p=187}}.</ref>
]
Stability was somewhat restored during the reign of ] ({{reign|829|842}}), who exploited economic growth to complete construction programs, including rebuilding the ], overhaul provincial governance, and wage inconclusive campaigns against the Abbasids.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=491–495|Holmes|2008|2p=265|Auzépy|2009|3pp=273–274}} After his death, his empress ], ruling on behalf of her son ], permanently extinguished the iconoclastic movement;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=498–501|Holmes|2008|2p=266}} the empire prospered under their sometimes-fraught rule. However, Michael was posthumously vilified by historians loyal to the dynasty of his successor ], who assassinated him in 867 and who was given credit for his predecessor's achievements.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=265–266|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=504–505|Auzépy|2009|3p=254|Tougher|2009|4pp=292–293, 296}}


=== 867–1081 ===
The Ostrogoths were soon reunited under the command of King ] and ] in 546. Belisarius, who had been sent back to Italy in 544, was eventually recalled to Constantinople in 549.<ref name="B236-258">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=xxvi}}.</ref> The arrival of the Armenian eunuch ] in Italy (late 551) with an army of 35,000 men marked another shift in Gothic fortunes. Totila was defeated at the ] and his successor, ], was defeated at the ] (October 552). Despite continuing resistance from a few Gothic garrisons and two subsequent invasions by the ] and ], the war for the Italian peninsula was at an end.<ref name="B259-281">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=93}}.</ref> In 551, ], a noble from ] ], sought Justinian's help in a rebellion against the king, and the emperor dispatched a force under ], a successful military commander. The empire held on to a small slice of the ] coast until the reign of Heraclius.<ref name="B86-288">{{harvnb|Bury|1923|loc=}}; {{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=11}}.</ref>
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Doukas dynasty}}
Basil I ({{reign|867|886}}) continued Michael's policies.{{sfnm|Tougher|2009|1pp=292, 296|Holmes|2008|2p=266}} His armies campaigned with mixed results in Italy but ] the ].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=266|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=522–524|Treadgold|1997|3pp=455–458}} His successor ] ({{reign|886|912}}){{efn|Leo VI was officially the son of Basil I, but a persistent rumour alleged that he had been fathered by Michael III, who had previously taken Leo's mother ] as his mistress. One of Leo's first acts was to rebury Michael III in Basil's mausoleum in the ] complex, which exacerbated the rumours.{{sfnm|Tougher|2009|1p=296|Kaldellis|2023|2p=526}}}} compiled and propagated a huge number of written works. These included the '']'', a Greek translation of Justinian I's law-code which included over 100 new laws created by Leo; the '']'', a military treatise; and the '']'', which codified Constantinople's trading regulations.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=493, 496–498|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=429–433|Holmes|2008|3p=267}} In non-literary contexts Leo was less successful: the empire ] and ],{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=267|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=534–535}} while he provoked theological scandal by marrying four times in an attempt to father a legitimate heir.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=537–539|Holmes|2008|2p=267|Shepard|2009b|3p=503}}


The early reign of that heir, ], was tumultuous, as his mother ], his uncle ], the patriarch ], the powerful ], and other influential figures jockeyed for power.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1p=505|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=540–543|Holmes|2008|3p=267}} In 920, the admiral ] used his fleet to secure power, crowning himself and demoting Constantine to the position of junior co-emperor.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=543–544|Shepard|2009b|2pp=505–507}} His reign, which brought ] and successes in the east under the general ], was ended in 944 by the machinations of his sons, whom Constantine soon usurped in turn.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=508–509|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=546–552|Holmes|2008|3p=268}} Constantine's ineffectual sole rule has often been construed as ], but while several works were compiled, they were largely intended to legitimise and glorify the emperor's ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=553–555|Holmes|2008|2p=268}} ] died young; under two soldier-emperors, ] ({{reign|963|969}}) and ] ({{reign|969|976}}), the Roman army claimed numerous military successes, including the ] and ], and a ] in 971. John in particular was an astute administrator who reformed military structures and implemented effective fiscal policies.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=563–573|Holmes|2008|2p=268–269|Magdalino|2002|3p=176}}
In the east, the Roman–Persian Wars continued until 561 when the envoys of Justinian and Khosrau agreed on a 50-year peace.<ref>{{harvnb|Greatrex|2005|p=489}}; {{harvnb|Greatrex|Lieu|2002|p=113}}</ref> By the mid-550s, Justinian had won victories in most theatres of operation, with the notable exception of the ], which were subjected to repeated incursions from the ] and the ]. Tribes of ] and ] were later resettled in the northwestern Balkans, during the reign of Heraclius.<ref>{{harvnb|Bury|1920|loc=}}</ref> Justinian called Belisarius out of retirement and defeated the new Hunnish threat. The strengthening of the Danube fleet caused the ] Huns to withdraw and they agreed to a treaty that allowed safe passage back across the Danube.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2005|pp=11, 56–62}}; {{harvnb|Sarantis|2009|loc=''passim''}}.</ref>


After John's death, Constantine VII's grandsons ] and ] ruled jointly for half a century, although the latter exercised no real power.{{sfn|Holmes|2008|pp=268}} Their early reign was occupied by conflicts against two prominent generals, ] and ], which ended in 989 with the former's death and the latter's submission, and with a power struggle against the eunuch ], who was dismissed in 985.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=522–526|Magdalino|2002|2p=202|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=573–578}} Basil, who for unknown reasons never married or had children, subsequently refused to delegate any authority: he sidelined the military establishment by taking personal command of the army and promoting officers loyal to him.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=526, 531|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=578–579|Holmes|2008|3p=269}} His reign was preoccupied with ], which ended in total Byzantine victory at the ] in 1018.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=269|Shepard|2009b|2pp=526–29|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=579–582}} Diplomatic efforts, critical for that success,{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1p=529|Holmes|2008|2p=271}} also contributed to the ] in the 1020s and coexistence with the new ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=584|Holmes|2008|2pp=270–271|Magdalino|2002|3p=180}} When he died in 1025, Basil's empire stretched from the Danube and Sicily in the west to the ] in the east; his swift expansion was, however, unaccompanied by administrative reforms.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009b|1pp=531–536|Holmes|2008|2p=271}}
Although polytheism had been ] since at least the time of Constantine in the 4th century, traditional Greco-Roman culture was still influential in the Eastern empire in the 6th century.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=65}}</ref> Philosophers such as ] drew on ] ideas in addition to Christian thought and ]. Nevertheless, ] began to be gradually supplanted by or amalgamated into newer ]. The closure of the ] in 529 was a notable turning point.<ref>{{harvnb|Evans|2005|p=68}}</ref> Hymns written by ] marked the development of the ], while the architects ] and ] worked to complete the new Church of the ], ], which was designed to replace an older church destroyed during the Nika Revolt. Completed in 537, the Hagia Sophia stands today as one of the major monuments of Byzantine architectural history.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=113, 128}}.</ref> During the 6th and 7th centuries, the Empire was struck by a ], which greatly devastated the population and contributed to a significant economic decline and a weakening of the Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Bray|2004|pp=19–47}}; {{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=110–111}}; {{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=196–197}}.</ref>


] (1031) by the Byzantines under ] and the counterattack by the ]|alt=Depiction of an army attacking a walled town]]
]
After Constantine VIII's death in 1028, his daughters, the empresses ] ({{reign|1028|1052}}) and ] ({{reign|1042|1056}}), held the keys to power: four emperors (], ], ], and ]) ruled only because of their connection to Zoe, while ] ({{reign|1056|1057}}) was selected by Theodora.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1pp=202–203|Holmes|2008|2pp=271–272|Angold|2009|3pp=587–588|Kaldellis|2023|4pp=588–589}} This political instability, regular budget deficits, a string of expensive military failures, and other problems connected to over-extension led to substantial issues in the empire;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=590, 593|Magdalino|2002|2pp=181–182|Angold|2009|3pp=587–598}} its strategic focus moved from maintaining its hegemony to prioritizing defence.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=602}}
After Justinian died in 565, his successor, ] refused to pay the large tribute to the Persians. Meanwhile, the Germanic ] invaded Italy; by the end of the century only a third of Italy was in Byzantine hands. Justin's successor, ], choosing between his enemies, awarded subsidies to the ] while taking military action against the Persians. Though Tiberius' general, ], led an effective campaign on the eastern frontier, subsidies failed to restrain the Avars. They captured the Balkan fortress of ] in 582, while the Slavs began to make inroads across the Danube.<ref name="Louth 2005 113–115">{{harvnb|Louth|2005|pp=113–115}}; {{harvnb|Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou|1970|loc=''passim''}}; {{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=231–232}}.</ref>


The empire soon came under sustained assault on three fronts, from the ], the ] in the north, and the ]. The Byzantine army struggled with confronting these enemies, who did not organise themselves as traditional states and were thus untroubled by defeats in set-piece battles.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=272–273|Magdalino|2002|2p=182|Kaldellis|2023|3p=636}} The year 1071 brought two consequential reverses: ], the last remaining Byzantine settlement in Italy, was ], while the Seljuks won a decisive victory at the ], taking the emperor ] prisoner.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=273|Magdalino|2002|2pp=184–185, 189}} The latter event sparked a decade-long civil war, during which the Seljuks took possession of Anatolia up to the ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=629–637|Angold|2009|2pp=609–610}}
Maurice, who meanwhile succeeded Tiberius, intervened in a Persian civil war, placed the legitimate ] back on the throne and married his daughter to him. Maurice's treaty with his new brother-in-law enlarged the territories of the Empire to the East and allowed the energetic Emperor to focus on the Balkans. By 602, a series of successful Byzantine ] had pushed the Avars and Slavs back across the Danube.<ref name="Louth 2005 113–115"/> However, Maurice's refusal to ransom several thousand captives taken by the Avars, and his order to the troops to winter in the Danube caused his popularity to plummet. A revolt broke out under an officer named Phocas, who marched the troops back to Constantinople; Maurice and his family were murdered while trying to escape.<ref>{{harvnb|Fine|1983|p=33}}</ref>


=== Shrinking borders === === 1081–1204 ===
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty|Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty}}
One prominent general, ], usurped the throne in 1081. In contrast to the prior turmoil, the three reigns of Alexios ({{reign|1081|1118}}), his son ] ({{reign|1118|1143}}), and his grandson ] ({{reign|1143|1180}}) lasted a century and ] for the final time.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=273–274|Angold|2009|2p=611}} Alexios immediately faced the Normans under ], who were ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=639–642|Holmes|2008|2p=275|Magdalino|2002|3p=190}} He then targeted the Pechenegs, who ] with help from the ], who were in turn defeated three years later.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=642–644|Holmes|2008|2p=275|Angold|2009|3pp=611–612}} Finally, looking to recover Asia Minor from the Seljuks, he approached ] for help {{circa|1095}}. He did not anticipate the scale of western Christendom's response—the ] led to the recapture of western Anatolia, although Alexios soon fell out with its leaders.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=275|Magdalino|2002|2p=190|Angold|2009|3p=621–623}} The rest of his reign was spent ] and Seljuks, establishing a new, loyal aristocracy to ensure stability, and carrying out fiscal and ecclesiastical reforms.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1pp=274–275|Angold|2009|2pp=612–613, 619–621, 623–625|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=645–647, 659–663}}


] from the ] of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting ] and ], flanked by ] (left) and his wife ] (right), 12th century|alt=A mosaic depicting a haloed woman holding a baby, flanked by a man and woman, both crowned and haloed]]
==== Heraclian dynasty ====
Alexios' concentration of power in the hands of his ] meant the most serious political threats came from within the imperial family—before his coronation, John II had to overcome ] and ], and the primary threat during his reign was ].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=274|Magdalino|2009|2pp=629–630}} John campaigned annually and extensively—he fought the Pechenegs in 1122, the ], and the Seljuks throughout his reign, notably waging ] in his final years—but did not achieve large territorial gains.{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=275|Magdalino|2009|2pp=631–633|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=664–670}} In 1138, John raised the imperial standard over the Crusader ] to intimidate the city into allying with the Byzantines, but chose not to attack, fearing that it would provoke western Christendom to respond.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=669|Holmes|2008|2p=275}}
{{details|Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty}}
] of the ], ]]]
].]]


Manuel I utilised his father's overflowing imperial treasury in pursuit of his ambitions and to secure the empire's position in an increasingly multilateral geopolitical landscape.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=670, 676–677|Magdalino|2009|2pp=644–646}} Through a combination of ], he cultivated a ring of allies and clients around the empire: the Turks of the ], the ], the ], Balkan princes, Italian and Dalmatian cities, and most importantly Antioch and the ], marrying ] in 1161.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=678, 683–688|Holmes|2008|2pp=275–276}} Manuel averted the threat of war during the tumultuous passage of the ] through Byzantine territories in 1147, but the campaign's failure was blamed on the Byzantines by western contemporaries.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=679–681|Magdalino|2009|2pp=637–638}} He was less successful militarily: an invasion of ] was decisively defeated by ] in 1156, leading to tensions with ], the Holy Roman Emperor;{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=682–683|Magdalino|2002|2p=194|Magdalino|2009|3pp=638–641}} two decades later, an invasion of Anatolia was resoundingly defeated at the ].{{sfnm|Magdalino|2009|1pp=643–644|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=692–693}}
After Maurice's murder by ], Khosrau used the pretext to reconquer the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Foss|1975|p=722}}.</ref> Phocas, an unpopular ruler invariably described in Byzantine sources as a "tyrant", was the target of a number of Senate-led plots. He was eventually deposed in 610 by Heraclius, who sailed to Constantinople from ] with an icon affixed to the prow of his ship.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=41}}; {{harvnb|Speck|1984|p=178}}.</ref>


], by ] (1840)|alt=A painting of an army marching into a city gate with much smoke burning in the background]]
Following the accession of Heraclius, the ] advance pushed deep into the Levant, occupying ] and ] and removing the ] to ].<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=42–43}}.</ref> The counter-attack launched by Heraclius took on the character of a holy war, and an ] image of Christ was carried as a military standard<ref>{{harvnb|Grabar|1984|p=37}}; {{harvnb|Cameron|1979|p=23}}.</ref> (similarly, when Constantinople was saved from a combined Avar - Sassanid - ] siege in 626, the victory was attributed to the icons of the Virgin that were led in procession by ] about the walls of the city).<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|1979|pp=5–6, 20–22}}.</ref> In this very ], amidst the climactic ], the combined Avar, Sassanid, and Slavic forces unsuccessfully besieged the Byzantine capital between June and July. After this, the Sassanid army was forced to withdraw to ]. The loss came just after news had reached them of yet another Byzantine victory, where Heraclius's brother ] scored well against the Persian general ].<ref name="Norwich93">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=93}}</ref> Following this, Heraclius led an invasion into Sassanid Mesopotami once again.
Manuel's death left the empire rudderless and it soon came under intense pressure.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=695}} His son ] was too young to rule, and his troubled regency was soon overthrown by ], who was himself replaced by ] in 1185.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1p=194|Holmes|2008|2p=276}} Centrifugal forces swirled at the borders as ambitious rulers seized their chance: Hungary and the Turks captured Byzantine territories, ] seized Cyprus; and most injuriously, ] caused the foundation of a ].{{sfnm|Holmes|2008|1p=276|Magdalino|2002|2pp=194–195|Magdalino|2009|3p=655}} Relations with the west deteriorated further after Constantinople allied with ], the vanquisher of the ], whose leaders also conflicted with Byzantium as they passed through its territory.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002|1pp=195–196|Magdalino|2009|2pp=648–651|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=706–710}} In 1195, Isaac II was deposed by his brother ]; this particular quarrel proved fatal.{{sfn|Holmes|2008|p=276}}


The ] was originally intended to target ], but amid strategic difficulties, Isaac II's son ] convinced the crusaders to restore his father to the throne in exchange for a huge tribute.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=718–720|Magdalino|2009|2pp=651–652}} They ], reinstating Isaac II and his son to the throne. The new rulers grew swiftly unpopular and were deposed by ], which the crusaders used as a pretext to ], ransacking the wealth it had accumulated over nine centuries.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=720–724|Magdalino|2009|2pp=652–653}}
The main Sassanid force was destroyed at ] in 627, and in 629 Heraclius restored the True Cross to Jerusalem in a majestic ceremony,<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=46}}; {{harvnb|Baynes|1912}}, ''passim''; {{harvnb|Speck|1984|p=178}}.</ref> as he marched into the Sassanid capital of ], where anarchy and civil war reigned as a result of the enduring war. Eventually, the Persians were obliged to withdraw all armed forces and return Sassanid-ruled ], the ] and whatever imperial territories of Mesopotamia and ] were in Roman hands at the time of an earlier peace treaty in c. 595. The war had exhausted both the Byzantines and Sassanids, however, and left them extremely vulnerable to the ] that emerged in the following years.<ref>{{harvnb|Foss|1975|pp=746–747}}.</ref> The Byzantines suffered a crushing defeat by the Arabs at the ] in 636, while ] fell in 637.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=50}}.</ref>


===1204–1453===
==== Siege of Constantinople (674–678) ====
], {{Circa|1204}}.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=280|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=733–734|Reinert|2002|3pp=250–253|Angold|2009b|4p=731}}|alt=A map showing the competing states after the Fourth Crusade.]]
The Arabs, now firmly in ], sent frequent raiding parties deep into Asia Minor, and in ] itself. The Arab fleet was finally repulsed through the use of ], and a thirty-years' truce was signed between the Empire and the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=61–62}}.</ref> However, the ]n raids continued unabated, and accelerated the demise of classical urban culture, with the inhabitants of many cities either refortifying much smaller areas within the old city walls, or relocating entirely to nearby fortresses.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=102–114}}; {{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=47}}.</ref> Constantinople itself dropped substantially in size, from 500,000 inhabitants to just 40,000–70,000, and, like other urban centres, it was partly ruralised. The city also lost the free grain shipments in 618, after Egypt fell first to the Persians and then to the Arabs, and public wheat distribution ceased.<ref>{{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=38–42, 47}}; {{harvnb|Wickham|2009|p=260}}.</ref>
{{further|Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty}}
Byzantine territories fragmented into competing political entities. The crusaders crowned ] as the ruler of a new ] in Constantinople; it soon suffered ] against the Bulgarians in 1205. It also failed to expand west or east, where three Greek successor states had formed: the ] and the ] in Asia Minor, and the ] on the Adriatic. The Venetians acquired many ports and islands, and the ] emerged in southern Greece.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=280|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=733–734|Reinert|2002|3pp=250–253|Angold|2009b|4p=731}} Trebizond ] the key port of ] in 1214 and thereafter was unable to affect matters away from the southeastern Black Sea.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=755–758|Angold|2009b|2p=737}} For a time, it seemed like Epirus was the one most likely to reclaim Constantinople from the Latins, and its ruler ] crowned himself emperor, but he suffered ] in 1230 and Epirote power waned.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=283|Reinert|2002|2p=254|Angold|2009b|3pp=737–738|Kaldellis|2023|4pp=766–770}}


Nicaea, ruled by the ] and composed of a mixture of Byzantine refugees and native Greeks, blocked the Latins and the Seljuks of Rum from expanding east and west respectively.{{sfnm|Reinert|2002|1p=253|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=760–762}} ] ({{reign|1221|1254}}) was a very capable emperor.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=771|Laiou|2008|2pp=282–283}} His ] economic policies strongly encouraged Nicaean ],{{sfnm|Angold|2009b|1p=740|Laiou|2008|2pp=282–283|Kaldellis|2023|3p=772}} while he made many diplomatic treaties, especially after ] armies ] and ] between 1237 and 1243. This chaos was an opportunity for John, who fought numerous successful campaigns against the states which bore the brunt of the ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=774–781|Reinert|2002|2p=254}} Soon after his death, ] was usurped by ], founder of the ], who ] in 1261.{{sfnm|Laiou|2008|1p=283|Reinert|2002|2p=254}}
The void left by the disappearance of the old semi-autonomous civic institutions was filled by the theme system, which entailed dividing Asia Minor into "provinces" occupied by distinct armies that assumed civil authority and answered directly to the imperial administration. This system may have had its roots in certain ''ad hoc'' measures taken by Heraclius, but over the course of the 7th century it developed into an entirely new system of imperial governance.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=208–215}}; {{harvnb|Kaegi|2003|pp=236, 283}}.</ref> The massive cultural and institutional restructuring of the Empire consequent on the loss of territory in the 7th century has been said to have caused a decisive break in east Mediterranean ''Romanness'' and that the Byzantine state is subsequently best understood as another successor state rather than a real continuation of the Roman Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Heather|2005|p=431}}.</ref>


Michael chose to expand the empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople.{{Sfn|Reinert|2002|p=257}} The efforts of ] and later his grandson ] marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts to restore the glory of the empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II often backfired, like the time the ] ravaged the countryside, which increased public resentment towards Constantinople.{{Sfn|Reinert|2002|p=261}}
] during the Byzantine–Arab Wars (from the ], ], Madrid).]]


] in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature|alt=A painting of a siege of a city]]
The withdrawal of large numbers of troops from the Balkans to combat the Persians and then the Arabs in the east opened the door for the gradual southward expansion of Slavic peoples into the peninsula, and, as in Asia Minor, many cities shrank to small fortified settlements.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=43–45, 66, 114–115}}</ref> In the 670s, the ] were pushed south of the Danube by the arrival of the ]. In 680, Byzantine forces sent to disperse these new settlements were defeated.<ref name="Haldon 1990 66–67">{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=66–67}}.</ref>


The situation became worse for Byzantium during the civil wars which erupted after Andronikos III died. A ] devastated the empire, allowing the Serbian ruler ] to overrun most of the empire's remaining territory and establish a ].{{sfn|Vasiliev|1964|pp=617–619}} In 1354, an earthquake at ] devastated the fort, allowing the ] to ] and establish themselves in Europe, after originally being hired as mercenaries during the civil war by ].{{Sfnm|Reinert|2002|1p=268|Vasiliev|1964|2p=622}} By the time the Byzantine civil wars ended, the Ottomans had ] and subjugated them as vassals. After the ], much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.{{Sfn|Reinert|2002|p=270}}
In 681, ] signed a treaty with the Bulgar khan ], and the ] assumed sovereignty over a number of Slavic tribes that had previously, at least in name, recognised Byzantine rule.<ref name="Haldon 1990 66–67"/> In 687–688, the final Heraclian emperor, ], led an expedition against the Slavs and Bulgarians, and made significant gains, although the fact that he had to fight his way from ] to ] demonstrates the degree to which Byzantine power in the north Balkans had declined.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|p=71}}.</ref>


Constantinople at this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, ]'s army of 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city.{{Sfn|Runciman|1990|pp=84–86}} Despite a desperate last-ditch defence of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces (c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign),{{sfnm|Runciman|1990|1pp=84–85}} Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans after ]. The final Byzantine emperor, ], was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken.{{Sfn|Hindley|2004|p=300}}
Justinian II attempted to break the power of the urban aristocracy through severe taxation and the appointment of "outsiders" to administrative posts. He was driven from power in 695, and took shelter first with the Khazars and then with the Bulgarians. In 705, he returned to Constantinople with the armies of the ] khan ], retook the throne, and instituted a reign of terror against his enemies. With his final overthrow in 711, supported once more by the urban aristocracy, the Heraclian dynasty came to an end.<ref>{{harvnb|Haldon|1990|pp=70–78, 169–171}}; {{harvnb|Haldon|2004|pp=216–217}}; {{harvnb|Kountoura-Galake|1996|pp=62–75}}.</ref>


== Government ==
==== Isaurian dynasty to the accession of Basil I ====
{{Multiple image
{{details|Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty}}
| footer =
| align = right
| direction = vertical
| image1 = Byzantine Empire Themata-750-en.svg
| width1 = 220
| alt1 = A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colors in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (green), Anatolic (brown), Bucellarians (orange) and Armeniacs (purple). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Samos, Crete and Cyprus.
| caption1 = The ''themes'', {{Circa|750}}
| image2 = Byzantine Empire Themata-950-en.svg
| width2 = 220
| alt2 = A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colors in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Samos (dark grey), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (dark grey), Anatolic and Seleucia (brown), Bucellarians (orange), Paphlagonia (navy blue), Cappadocia (green), Charsianon (pink), Armeniacs (purple), Lycandus and Mesopotamia (brown), Sebastea (blue), Koloneia (dark green) and Chaldia (light blue). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Crete and Cyprus.
| caption2 = The ''themes'', {{Circa|950}}
}}


=== Governance ===
]
{{See also|Roman emperor|Coronation of the Byzantine emperor|Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy}}
The patriarch inaugurated emperors from 457 onwards, while the crowds of Constantinople proclaimed their support, thus legitimizing their rule.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=35, 189, 222|Nicol|1988|2p=63|Howard-Johnston|2024|3p=8}} The ] originally had its own identity but later became a ceremonial extension of the emperor's court.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=35|Howard-Johnston|2024|2p=8|Browning|1992|3p=98}} The reign of Phocas ({{Reign|602|610}}) was the first military coup after the third century, and he was one of 43 emperors violently removed from power.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=338|Treadgold|1997|2p=326|Nicol|1988|3p=64}} From Heraclius' accession in 610 till 1453, a total of nine dynasties ruled the Empire. During this time, for only 30 of the 843 years were the reigning emperors unrelated by blood or kinship, largely due to the practice of co-emperorship.{{sfn|Nicol|1988|p=63}}


Diocletian and Constantine's reforms reorganized the Empire into ]s and separated the army from the civil administration.{{sfnm|Louth|2005|1pp=306–308|Treadgold|1997|2pp=82–83}} From the 7th century onward, these prefectures were reorganized into provinces and later divided into districts called '']'', governed by military commanders known as '']'', who oversaw both civil and military matters.{{sfnm|Louth|2005|1p=303|Treadgold|1997|2pp=430–431|Kaldellis|2023|3pp=418, 421}} Before this change, cities were self-governing communities represented by central government and church officials, while emperors focused on defense and foreign relations.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|1p=98|Kaldellis|2023|2p=185}} However, constant wars and raids by Arab forces drastically changed this structure. City councils declined, as did the local elites who supported them. Through his legal reforms, Leo VI ({{reign|886|912}}) centralised power, formally ending city councils' rights and the legislative authority of the senate.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=397, 407–409, 536|Howard-Johnston|2024|2p=67|Browning|1992|3p=98}}
] turned back the Muslim assault in 718 and addressed himself to the task of reorganising and consolidating the themes in Asia Minor. His successor, ], won noteworthy victories in northern Syria and thoroughly undermined Bulgarian strength.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=67–68}}.</ref>


=== Diplomacy ===
Taking advantage of the Empire's weakness after the ] in the early 820s, the Arabs re-emerged and ]. They also successfully attacked Sicily, but in 863 general ] gained a ] against ], the ] of Melitene (]). Under the leadership of emperor ], the Bulgarian threat also re-emerged, but in 815–816 Krum's son, ], signed a ] with ].<ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=432–433}}.</ref>
{{main|Byzantine diplomacy}}
{{see also|Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire}}
Diplomacy is often regarded as one of the Empire's lasting contributions to European history, particularly in preserving civilization in Eastern Europe.{{sfn|Obolensky|1994|p=3}} This reputation stems from its aggressive treaty negotiations, alliances with the enemies of its adversaries, and strategic partnerships.{{sfn|Zhang|2023|p=221}} For instance, the Empire supported the Turks against the Persians during the ] and exploited tensions between the ] and the ].{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=322–323, 325, 366–367, 511}} Diplomacy frequently involved long-term embassies, hosting foreign royals as political pawns, and deliberately displaying wealth and power to ensure such impressions spread widely.{{sfnm|Neumann|2006|1pp=4–5|Chrysos|1990|2p=35|Shepard|1990a|3pp=61–66}} Other diplomatic strategies included political marriages, granting titles, bribery, persuasion, and intelligence gathering.{{sfnm|Zhang|2023|1p=221|2a1=Sinnigen|2y=1963|2p=|Haldon|1990|3pp=281–282|Shepard|1990a|4pp=65–67}} Notably, the ']', established in the 4th century, is considered one of the earliest foreign intelligence agencies.{{sfn|Zhang|2023|p=221}}


] in 829, sent by emperor ] to the Abbasid caliph ] |alt=Manuscript illustration of an embassy travelling between two rulers]]
==== Religious dispute over iconoclasm ====
{{Main|Byzantine iconoclasm}}
The 8th and early 9th centuries were also dominated by controversy and religious division over ], which was the main political issue in the Empire for over a century. ]s (here meaning all forms of religious imagery) were banned by Leo and Constantine from around 730, leading to revolts by ]s (supporters of icons) throughout the empire. After the efforts of empress ], the ] met in 787 and affirmed that icons could be venerated but not worshiped. Irene is said to have endeavoured to negotiate a marriage between herself and Charlemagne, but, according to ], the scheme was frustrated by Aetios, one of her favourites.<ref name="G89">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=167–170}}; {{harvnb|Garland|1999|p=89}}.</ref>


Diplomacy after the reign of Theodosius I ({{reign|379|395}}) shifted significantly from the more conquest-focused policies of the ], instead emphasizing peace as a strategic necessity.{{sfn|Whitby|2008|pp=122–123}} Even in the 6th century, when the Empire had greater resources and fewer threats, the enormous costs of defense, agricultural self-reliance, and aggressive neighbors made avoiding war a priority.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=309|Whitby|2008|2pp=122–123, 125|Haldon|1990|3p=282-283}} Between the 4th and 8th centuries, diplomats capitalized on the Empire's reputation as the ''Orbis Romanus'' and its administrative sophistication to influence new settlements on former Roman territories.{{sfnm|Chrysos|1990|1pp=25,36|Haldon|1990|2p=289}} Byzantine diplomacy often drew fledgling states into dependency, creating a network of inter-state relations (the ]) dominated by the Empire and leveraging Christianity to strengthen these ties.{{sfnm|Haldon|1990|1p=289|Chrysos|1990|2pp=25, 33, 35|Neumann|2006|3pp=4–5}} This network emphasized treaty-making, integrating new rulers into the "family of kings," and assimilating values, institutions, and attitudes.{{sfnm|Chrysos|1990|1pp=33, 35|Neumann|2006|2pp=4–5|Kaldellis|2023|3p=338}} These practices have even been referred to as creating a "Byzantine Caliphate", where religion re-framed the civilised-versus-barbarian dichotomy in classical times.{{sfnm|Chrysos|1990|1pp=33, 35|Zhang|2023|2p=221}} By contrast, diplomatic relations with Muslim states focused primarily on war-related issues, such as negotiating hostages or preventing hostilities.{{sfnm|Kazhdan|1990|1p=4|Kennedy|1990|2pp=134, 137, 143}}
In the early 9th century, Leo V reintroduced the policy of iconoclasm, but in 843 empress ] restored the veneration of icons with the help of ].<ref name="P11">{{harvnb|Parry|1996|pp=11–15}}.</ref> Iconoclasm played a part in the further alienation of East from West, which worsened during the so-called ], when ] challenged the elevation of ] to the patriarchate.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=267}}.</ref>


] of Emperor ] during his visit to ] and ] in 1438|alt=A pencil sketch of a bearded, crowned horseman]]
=== Macedonian dynasty and resurgence (867–1025) ===
{{see also|Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty}}
]


Peace and survival, rather than conquest, were central objectives. Historians describe this approach as "defensive imperialism," which evolved between the 9th and 10th centuries to include halting and reversing Muslim advances, cultivating alliances with Armenians and Rus, and subjugating the Bulgarians.{{sfnm|Kazhdan|1990|1pp=7, 10|Kennedy|1990|2p=134|Chrysos|1990|3pp=28–29|Howard-Johnston|2008|4p=949|Haldon|1990|5pp=286,949}}{{sfn|Howard-Johnston|2008|p=949}} Diplomatic relations with Western states became more challenging after 752–753 and particularly during the Crusades, as shifts in the balance of power undermined the Empire's dominance and its use of the ].{{sfn|Kazhdan|1990|pp=5, 11, 13, 20}} By the 11th century, the Empire adopted a principle of diplomatic equality, leveraging the emperor's personal presence to negotiate.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1990|pp=20–21}}
The accession of ] to the throne in 867 marks the beginning of the ], which would rule for the next two and a half centuries. This dynasty included some of the most able emperors in Byzantium's history, and the period is one of revival and resurgence. The Empire moved from defending against external enemies to reconquest of territories formerly lost.<ref name="Browning-1992-95">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=95}}.</ref>


After recovering Constantinople in 1261, the Empire maintained its influence as a great power in the 13th and 14th centuries, despite its declining strength. This success is attributed to its efficient statecraft and strategic use of the Constantinople patriarch.{{sfnm|Howard-Johnston|2008|1p=945|Oikonomides|1990|2p=74-77}}
In addition to a reassertion of Byzantine military power and political authority, the period under the Macedonian dynasty is characterised by a cultural revival in spheres such as philosophy and the arts. There was a conscious effort to restore the brilliance of the period before the ] and subsequent ], and the Macedonian era has been dubbed the "Golden Age" of Byzantium.<ref name="Browning-1992-95"/> Though the Empire was significantly smaller than during the reign of Justinian, it had regained significant strength, as the remaining territories were less geographically dispersed and more politically, economically, and culturally integrated.


==== Wars against the Arabs ==== === Law ===
{{Main|Byzantine law}}
{{details|Byzantine–Arab Wars (780–1180)}}
] originated with the ] and evolved primarily through the annual ] and the opinions of educated specialists known as ]s.{{sfnm|Chitwood|2017|Stein|1999|1p=16|2pp=3–4, 8, 16|Longchamps de Berier|2014|3pp=217–218}} Hadrian ({{reign|117|138}}) made the Praetorian Edict permanent and established a rule where a legal point jurists unanimously agreed on became law.{{sfnm|Stein|1999|1pp=14, 16}} Over time, conflicting legal sources caused confusion about what the law should be.{{sfnm|Gregory|2010|1p=135|Kaldellis|2023|2p=168|Stein|1999|3p=27}} Efforts to address this included two private collections of imperial constitutions compiled during Diocletian's reign (284–305), the ]'' and the '']'' ({{reign|284|305}}).{{sfnm|Dingledy|2019|Kaiser|2015|1pp=2–14|2p=120}}
] defeats the ] ] at ] in 960, from the '']''.]]
In the early years of Basil I's reign, Arab raids on the coasts of Dalmatia were successfully repelled, and the region once again came under secure Byzantine control. This enabled Byzantine missionaries to penetrate to the interior and convert the Serbs and the principalities of modern-day ] and ] to Orthodox Christianity.<ref name=Browning-1992-96>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=96}}.</ref> An attempt to retake ] ended disastrously, however, when the local population sided with the Arabs and massacred the Byzantine garrison.<ref name="Karlin-Heyer 1967 24">{{harvnb|Karlin-Heyer|1967|p=24}}.</ref>


Theodosius II ({{reign|402|450}}) formalized Roman law by appointing five jurists as principal authorities and compiling legislation issued since Constantine’s reign into the ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|Stein|1999|Kaiser|2015|1p=168|3p=120|2pp=14, 16, 28}} This process culminated in the '']'' under Justinian I ({{reign|527|565}}), who commissioned a complete standardization of imperial decrees since Hadrian’s time and resolved conflicting legal opinions.{{sfnm|Gregory|2010|Stein|1999|1p=135|2pp=33–35|Dingledy|2019|3pp=2–14|Kaiser|2015|4pp=123–126}} The result became the definitive legal authority. This body of law covered not only ] but also ], including imperial power and administrative organization.{{sfnm|Stein|1999|1p=8|2a1=Merryman|2a2=Pérez-Perdomo|2y=2007|2p=21}} After 534, Justinian issued the ] in Greek, which marked a transition from Roman to Byzantine law. Legal historian Bernard Stolte distinguishes Roman law as this because Western Europe inherited law through the Latin texts of the ''Corpus Juris Civilis'' only.{{sfnm|Stolte|2015|1pp=356, 370|Stolte|2018|2pp=231–232}}
By contrast, the Byzantine position in ] was gradually consolidated so that by 873 ] had once again come under Byzantine rule,<ref name=Browning-1992-96/> and most of Southern Italy would remain in the Empire for the next 200 years.<ref name="Karlin-Heyer 1967 24"/> On the more important eastern front, the Empire rebuilt its defences and went on the offensive. The ] were defeated and their capital of Tephrike (Divrigi) taken, while the offensive against the ] began with the recapture of ].<ref name=Browning-1992-96/>


Zachary Chitwood argues that the ''Corpus Juris Civilis'' was largely inaccessible in Latin, particularly in the provinces.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|p=23}} Following the 7th-century Islamic conquests, people began questioning the development and application of law, leading to stronger ties between law and Christianity.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|p=185}} This context influenced Leo III ({{Reign|717|741}}) to develop the '']'', which emphasized humanity.{{sfnm|Chitwood|2017|1p=185|Nicol|1988|2pp=23–24|2p=65}} The Ecloga inspired practical legal texts like the ''Farmers' Law, Seamen's Law,'' and ''Soldiers' Law'', which Chitwood suggests were used daily in the provinces as companions to the ''Corpus Juris Civilis''.{{sfn|Chitwood|2017|pp=23, 132, 364}} During the Macedonian dynasty, efforts to reform law began with the ''Procheiron'' and the ''Eisagoge'', which aimed to replace the ''Ecloga'' due to its association with ] and to define the emperor's power under prevailing laws.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|Kaldellis|2023|Chitwood|2017|1p=97|2p=529|3pp=25–32, 44}} Leo VI ({{Reign|886|912}}) completed a ] of Roman law in Greek through the '']'', a monumental work of 60 books that became the foundation of Byzantine law.{{sfnm|Browning|1992|Chitwood|2017|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=97–98|2pp=32–35|3p=529}} Later, in 1345, Constantine Harmenopoulos compiled the '']'', a six-volume law book derived from various Byzantine legal sources.{{sfn|Stein|1999|p=35}}
]. Miniature from the ], an example of Hellenistic-influenced art.]]


== Military ==
Under Basil's son and successor, ], the gains in the east against the now-weak Abbasid Caliphate continued. However, Sicily was lost to the Arabs in 902, and in 904 ], the Empire's second city, was sacked by an Arab fleet. The weakness of the Empire in the naval sphere was quickly rectified, so that a few years later a Byzantine fleet had re-occupied ], lost in the 7th century, and also stormed ] in Syria. Despite this revenge, the Byzantines were still unable to strike a decisive blow against the Muslims, who inflicted a crushing defeat on the imperial forces when they attempted to regain ] in 911.<ref name="B101">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=101}}.</ref>
=== Army ===
{{Main|Eastern Roman army|Byzantine army}}
In the 5th century the East was fielding five armies of ~20,000 each in two army branches: stationary frontier units (]) and mobile forces (]).{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=59, 194|Haldon|2008b|2p=554|Treadgold|1997|3p=50}} The historian ] claims that the fiscally stretched Empire could only handle one major enemy at a time in the 6th century.{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=331}} The Islamic conquests between 634 and 642 led to significant changes, transforming the 4th-7th centuries field forces into provincial militia-like units which had a core of professional soldiers.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=454–455|Haldon|2008b|2p=555}} The state shifted the burden of supporting the armies onto local populations and during Leo VI ({{Reign|886|912}}) wove them into the tax system, where provinces evolved into military regions known as ''themata''.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=421-422,437|Haldon|2008b|2pp=555–556|Treadgold|1997|3pp=430–431|Neville|2004|4p=7}} Despite many challenges, the historian ] states that the field forces of the Eastern Empire between 284 and 602 were the best in the western world, while the historian Anthony Kaldellis believes that during the conquest period of the ] ({{reign|867|1056}}), they were the best in the empire's history.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=562|Treadgold|1995|2p=206}}


The military structure diversified to incorporate militia-like soldiers tied to regions, professional thematic forces (]), and imperial units mostly based in Constantinople (]).{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=555|Treadgold|1997|2pp=281, 432, 489}} Foreign mercenaries also increasingly became employed, including the better-known ''tagma'' regiment, the ], that guarded the emperor.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=556|Blöndal|1979|2pp=17, 20–22, 178–179}} The defence-orientated thematic militias were gradually replaced by more specialised offensive field armies, which could also counter the generals who rebelled against the emperor.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2021a|1p=463|Haldon|2008b|2p=556|Treadgold|1997|3pp=730–734, 737|Treadgold|1995|4p=29}} When the Empire was expanding, the state began to commute thematic military service for cash payments: in the 10th century, there were 6,000 Varangians, another 3,000 foreign mercenaries and when including paid and unpaid citizen soldiers, the army on paper was 140,000 (an expeditionary force was 15,000 soldiers and field armies seldom were more than 40,000).{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2021a|1p=463|Haldon|2008b|2p=555|Treadgold|1997|3pp=735–736}}
The death of the Bulgarian tsar ] in 927 severely weakened the Bulgarians, allowing the Byzantines to concentrate on the eastern front.<ref name=Browning-1992-107>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=107}}.</ref> Melitene was permanently recaptured in 934, and in 943 the famous general ] continued the offensive in ] with some noteworthy victories, culminating in the reconquest of ]. Kourkouas was especially celebrated for returning to Constantinople the venerated ], a relic purportedly imprinted with a portrait of Christ.<ref name=Browning-1992-108>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=108}}.</ref>


The thematic forces faded into insignificance—the government relying on the ''tagmata'', mercenaries and allies instead—and which led to a neglect in defensive capability.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Treadgold|1997|2pp=737, 794–796, 810}} Mercenary armies further fueled political divisions and civil wars that led to a collapse in the Empire's defence, and resulted in significant losses over territories such as Italy and the Anatolian heartland in the 11th century.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=634|Haldon|2008b|2p=557}} Major military and fiscal reforms under the emperors of the Komnenian dynasty after 1081 re-established a modest-sized, adequately compensated and competent army.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Treadgold|1997|2pp=825–826}} However, the costs were not sustainable and the structural weaknesses of the Komnenian approach—namely, the reliance on fiscal exemptions called ]—unraveled after the end of the reign of Manuel I ({{Reign|1143|1180}}).{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=557|Treadgold|1997|2pp=905–906}}
The soldier-emperors ] (reigned 963–969) and ] (969–976) expanded the empire well into Syria, defeating the emirs of north-west ]. The great city of ] was taken by Nikephoros in 962, and the Arabs were decisively expelled from Crete in 963. The recapture of Crete put an end to Arab raids in the Aegean, allowing mainland Greece to flourish once again. ] was permanently retaken in 965, and the successes of Nikephoros culminated in 969 with the recapture of ], which he incorporated as a province of the Empire.<ref name="Browning-1992-112">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=112}}.</ref> His successor John Tzimiskes recaptured Damascus, ], ], ], ], and ], putting Byzantine armies within striking distance of Jerusalem, although the Muslim power centres in Iraq and Egypt were left untouched.<ref name="Browning-1992-113">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=113}}.</ref> After much campaigning in the north, the last Arab threat to Byzantium, the rich province of Sicily, was targeted in 1025 by ], who died before the expedition could be completed. Nevertheless, by that time the Empire stretched from the straits of ] to the ] and from the Danube to Syria.<ref name="Browning-1992-116">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=116}}.</ref>


=== Navy ===
==== Wars against the Bulgarian Empire ====
{{Main|Byzantine Navy}}
{{details|Byzantine–Bulgarian wars}}
]'' showing the Byzantine fleet repelling the ] on Constantinople in 941.]]
The navy dominated the eastern Mediterranean and were active also on the Black Sea, the Sea of Marmara, and the Aegean.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=562, 656|Pryor|2008|2p=483}} Imperial naval forces were restructured to challenge Arab naval dominance in the 7th century, and later ceded their own maritime dominance to the ] and ] in the 11th century.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=399, 442|Blöndal|1979|2p=29|Haldon|2008b|3p=555}} The navy's patrols, as well as the chains of watchtowers and fire signals that warned inhabitants of threats, created the coastal defense for the Empire and were the responsibility of three themes: ], ], ] and an imperial fleet that consisted of mercenaries like the Norsemen and Russians that later became Varangians.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=502|Blöndal|1979|2pp=16, 29–30|Haldon|2008b|3p=560}}


A new type of war galley, the ], appeared early in the sixth century.{{sfnm|Pryor|2008|1p=487|Pryor|2017|2p=401|Markis|2002a|3p=92}}{{sfn|MacGeorge|2002|p=311}} A multi-purpose variant, the ], appeared during the reign of ] ({{reign|685|711}}) and could be used to transport cavalry.{{sfnm|Pryor|2008|1p=488|Pryor|2017|2p=403|Markis|2002a|3p=93}} The galleys were oar-driven, designed for coastal navigation, and are estimated to be able to operate for up to four days at a time.{{sfn|Pryor|2008|p=489}}{{sfn|Howard-Johnston|2008b|p=240}} They were equipped with apparatus to deliver ] in the 670s, and when ] ({{reign|867|886}}) developed professional marines, this combination kept a check on Muslim raiding through piracy.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=489|Blöndal|1979|2p=29|Treadgold|1995|3p=33|Howard-Johnston|2008|4p=947}} The ''dromon'' was the most advanced galley on the Mediterranean, until the 10th century development of a ''dromon'' called a ''galeai'', which superseded ''dromons'' after the development of a late 11th century Western (Southern Italian) variant.{{sfnm|Pryor|2008|1p=489|Pryor|2017|2pp=404, 408}}
]


=== Late era (1204–1453) ===
The traditional struggle with the ] continued through the Macedonian period, spurred by the question of religious supremacy over the ] state of ].<ref name="Browning-1992-95"/> Ending eighty years of peace between the two states, the powerful Bulgarian tsar ] invaded in 894 but was pushed back by the Byzantines, who used their fleet to sail up the ] to attack the Bulgarian rear, enlisting the support of the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=100}}.</ref> The Byzantines were defeated at the ] in 896, however, and agreed to pay annual subsidies to the Bulgarians.<ref name="B101"/>
{{Main|Byzantine army (Palaiologan era)}}
The rulers of the ] that retook the capital and the ] that ruled until 1453, built on the Komnenian foundation initially with four types of military units—the Thelematarii (volunteer soldiers), ] and the Southern Peloponnese Tzacones/Lakones (marines), and Proselontes/Prosalentai (oarsmen)—but similarly could not sustain funding a standing force, largely relying on mercenaries as soldiers and fiscal exemptions to ]rs who provided a small force of mostly cavalry.{{sfnm|Haldon|2008b|1p=558|Treadgold|1997|2pp=975, 1084}} The Fleet was disbanded in 1284 and attempts were made to build it back later but the ] sabotaged the effort.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=812, 860–861|Treadgold|1997|2pp=989, 1024}} The historian ] claims that over time, the distinction between field troops and garrison units eventually disappeared as resources were strained.{{sfn|Haldon|2008b|p=558}} The frequent civil wars further drained the Empire, now increasingly instigated by foreigners such as the Serbs and Turks to win concessions, and the emperors were dependent on mercenaries to keep control, all the while dealing with the impact of the ].{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=1881|Haldon|2008b|2p=559|Treadgold|1997|3p=1112}} The strategy of employing mercenary Turks to fight civil wars was repeatedly used by emperors and always led to the same outcome: subordination to the Turks.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=896|Haldon|2008b|2pp=558–559}}


== Society ==
Leo the Wise died in 912, and hostilities soon resumed as Simeon marched to Constantinople at the head of a large army.<ref>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=102–103}}.</ref> Though the walls of the city were impregnable, the Byzantine administration was in disarray and Simeon was invited into the city, where he was granted the crown of ''basileus'' (emperor) of Bulgaria and had the young emperor ] marry one of his daughters. When a revolt in Constantinople halted his dynastic project, he again invaded Thrace and conquered ].<ref>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=103–105}}.</ref> The Empire now faced the problem of a powerful Christian state within a few days' marching distance from Constantinople,<ref name="Browning-1992-95"/> as well as having to fight on two fronts.<ref name="B101"/>


=== Demography ===
A great imperial expedition under ] and ] ended with another crushing Byzantine defeat at the ] in 917, and the following year the Bulgarians were free to ravage northern Greece. Adrianople was plundered again in 923, and a Bulgarian army laid siege to Constantinople in 924. Simeon died suddenly in 927, however, and Bulgarian power collapsed with him. Bulgaria and Byzantium entered a long period of peaceful relations, and the Empire was now free to concentrate on the eastern front against the Muslims.<ref>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=106–107}}.</ref> In 968, Bulgaria was overrun by the ] under ], but three years later, John I Tzimiskes ] the Rus' and re-incorporated Eastern Bulgaria into the Byzantine Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=112–113}}.</ref>
{{Main|Population of the Byzantine Empire}}
{{See also|Armenians in the Byzantine Empire}}
As many as 27 million people lived in the Empire at its peak in 540, but fell to as low as 12 million by 800.{{Sfnm|Treadgold|1997|1pp=197, 384–385|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=21–22|Stathakopoulos|2008|3p=310}} Although plague and territorial losses to Arab Muslim invaders weakened the Empire, it eventually recovered and by the near end of the ] in 1025, the population is estimated to have been as high as 18 million.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1p=312|Treadgold|1997|2pp=931–932}} A few decades after the recapture of Constantinople in 1282, the Empire's population was in the range of 3–5 million; by 1312, the number had dropped to 2 million.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1p=313|Treadgold|1997|2p=1112}} By the time the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, there were only 50,000 people in the city, which was one-tenth of its population in its prime.{{Sfnm|Stathakopoulos|2008|1pp=310, 314|Stathakopoulos|2023|2p=31|Kaldellis|2023|3p=21}}


=== Education ===
]]]
{{Further|Byzantine university|Byzantine rhetoric}}
Education was voluntary and required financial means, so the most literate people were often those associated with the church.{{sfnm|Markopoulos|2008|1p=786|Jeffreys|2008|2p=798}} Primary education focused on teaching foundational subjects like reading, writing, and arithmetic whereas Secondary school focused on the ] and ] as their curriculum.{{Sfn|Markopoulos|2008|p=789}} The ] was formed in 425, and refounded in 1046 as a centre for law.{{sfn|Constantelos|1998|p=19|postscript="The fifth century marked a definite turning point in Byzantine higher education. Theodosios ΙΙ founded in 425 a major university with 31 chairs for law, philosophy, medicine, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music, rhetoric and other subjects. Fifteen chairs were assigned to Latin and 16 to Greek. The university was reorganized by Michael III (842–867) and flourished down to the fourteenth century."}}{{sfn|Kazhdan|Wharton|1990|p=122}}{{sfn|Rosser|2011|p=xxx}}


=== Slavery ===
Bulgarian resistance revived under the rule of the ], but the new emperor Basil II (r. 976–1025) made the submission of the Bulgarians his primary goal.<ref name="B115">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=115}}.</ref> Basil's first expedition against Bulgaria, however, resulted in a humiliating defeat at the ]. For the next few years, the emperor would be preoccupied with internal revolts in Anatolia, while the Bulgarians expanded their realm in the Balkans. The war dragged on for nearly twenty years. The Byzantine victories of ] and ] decisively weakened the Bulgarian army, and in annual campaigns, Basil methodically reduced the Bulgarian strongholds.<ref name="B115"/> At the ] in 1014 the Bulgarians were annihilated: their army was captured, and it is said that 99 out of every 100 men were blinded, with the hundredth man left with one eye so he could lead his compatriots home. When Tsar ] saw the broken remains of his once formidable army, he died of shock. By 1018, the last Bulgarian strongholds had surrendered, and the country became part of the Empire.<ref name="B115"/> This victory restored the Danube frontier, which had not been held since the days of the emperor Heraclius.<ref name="Browning-1992-116"/>
{{further||Slavery in the Byzantine Empire}}
During the third century, 10–15% of the population was enslaved (numbering around 3 million in the east).{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40|Rotman|2022|2p=32|Lavan|2016|3pp=16, 19}} Youval Rotman calls the changes to slavery during this period "different degrees of unfreedom".{{sfnm|Rotman|2009|1pp=18, 179|Rotman |2022|2p=59}} Previous roles fulfilled by slaves became high-demand free market professions (like tutors), and the state encouraged the ], tenants bound to the land, as a new legal category between freemen and slaves.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=39|Lenski|2021|2pp=473–474}} From 294, but not completely, the enslavement of children was forbidden; ] ({{reign|393|423}}) began freeing enslaved people who were prisoners of war, and from the 9th century onward, emperors freed the slaves of conquered people.{{sfnm|Rotman|2009|1pp=30–31|Kaldellis|2023|2p=425|Rotman|2022|3p=42|Lenski|2021|4p=470|Rotman|2010}} Christianity as an institution had no direct impact, but by the 6th century it was a bishop's duty to ransom Christians, there were established limits on trading them, and state policies which prohibited the enslavement of Christians shaped Byzantine slave-holding from the 8th century onwards.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=140|Rotman|2009|2loc=Chapter 2|Rotman|2022|3pp=37–38, 53|Lenski|2021|4pp=461–462}} However, slavery persisted due to a steady source of non-Christians, prices thus remained stable until 1300, when prices for adult slaves, particularly females, started rising.{{sfn|Harper|2010|p=237}}{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40|Rotman|2022|2p=53|Lenski|2021|3pp=467–468}}


=== Socio-economic ===
==== Relations with the Kievan Rus' ====
Agriculture was the main basis of taxation and the state sought to bind everyone to land for productivity.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=38|Brandes|2008|2p=563}} Most land holdings were small and medium-sized lots around villages, with family farms serving as the primary source of agriculture.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=39|Harvey|2008|2p=329}} The ''coloni,'' sometimes called proto-serfs, were free citizens, though historians still debate their exact status.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=39|Harvey|2008|2p=331}}
] under the walls of Constantinople (860) ]]


The Ekloge in 741 made marriage a Christian institution and no longer a private contract, where it evolved alongside the increased rights of slaves and the change in power relations.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=444|Rotman|2022|2p=85|Lenski|2021|3pp=464–465}} Marriage was considered an institution to sustain the population, transfer property rights, support the elderly of the family; and the Empress ] had additionally said that it was needed to restrict sexual ].{{sfnm|Talbot|1997|1p=121|Kazhdan|1990a|2p=132}} Women usually married between ages 15 and 20, and the average family had two children.{{sfnm|Rotman|2022|1p=83|Talbot|1997|2p=121|Kaldellis|2023|3p=41|Stathakopoulos|2008|4pp=309, 313}} Divorce could be done by mutual consent but was restricted over time, for example, only being allowed if a married person was joining a convent.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=88, 321, 444, 529, 588, 769|Talbot|1997|2pp=119, 122, 128}}
Between 850 and 1100, the Empire developed a mixed relationship with the new state of the ], which had emerged to the north across the Black Sea.<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115"/> This relationship would have long-lasting repercussions in the history of the ], and the Empire quickly became the main ] and cultural partner for Kiev. The Rus' launched their first attack against Constantinople ], pillaging the suburbs of the city. In 941, ] of the Bosphorus, but this time they were crushed, an indication of the improvements in the Byzantine military position after 907, when ]. Basil II could not ignore the emerging power of the Rus', and, following the example of his predecessors, he used religion as a means for the achievement of political purposes.<ref name="Cameron 2009 77">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=77}}.</ref> Rus'–Byzantine relations became closer following the marriage of ] to ] in 988, and the subsequent ].<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=114–115}}.</ref> Byzantine priests, architects, and artists were invited to work on numerous cathedrals and churches around Rus', expanding Byzantine cultural influence even further, while numerous Rus' served in the Byzantine army as mercenaries, most notably as the famous ].<ref name="Browning-1992-114-115"/>


Inheritance rights were well developed, including for all women.{{sfnm|Harris|2017|1p=13|Kaldellis|2023|2p=41|Garland|2006|3p=xiv}} The historian Anthony Kaldellis claims that these rights may have been what prevented the emergence of large properties and a hereditary nobility capable of intimidating the state.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40}} The prevalence of widows (estimated at 20%) meant that women often controlled family assets as heads of households and businesses, contributing to the rise of some empresses to power.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=40, 592|Stephenson|2010|2p=66}} Women played significant roles as taxpayers, landowners, and petitioners, often seeking to resolve property disputes in court.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=40, 592|Talbot|1997|2p=129|Garland|2006|3p=xvi}}
Even after the Christianisation of the Rus', however, relations were not always friendly. The most serious conflict between the two powers was the war of 968–971 in Bulgaria, but several Rus' raiding expeditions against the Byzantine cities of the Black Sea coast and Constantinople itself are also recorded. Although most were repulsed, they were often followed by treaties that were generally favourable to the Rus', such as the one concluded at the end of ], during which the Rus' gave an indication of their ambitions to compete with the Byzantines as an independent power.<ref name="Cameron 2009 77"/>


==== Apex ==== === Women ===
{{further||Women in the Byzantine Empire}}
]
Although women shared the same socio-economic status as men, they faced legal discrimination and had limitations in economic opportunities and vocations.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40|Talbot|1997|2pp=118–119}} Prohibited from serving as soldiers or holding political office, and restricted from serving as ]es in the Church from the 7th century onwards, women were mostly assigned household responsibilities that were "labour-intensive".{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40|Talbot|1997|2pp=126–127|Karras|2004|3pp=309–314}} They worked in professions, such as in the food and textile industry, as medical staff, in public baths, had a heavy presence in retail, and were practicing members of artisan guilds.{{sfnm|Talbot|1997|1pp=130–131|Harris|2017|2p=133|Garland|2006|3p=xiv|Kaldellis|2023|4pp=40–41}} They also worked in disreputable occupations: entertainers, tavern keepers, and prostitutes; a class where some saints and empresses allegedly originated from.{{sfnm|Talbot|1997|1p=131|Kazhdan|1990a|2p=136}} Prostitution was widespread, and attempts were made to limit it, especially during Justinian's reign under the influence of Theodora.{{sfnm|Grosdidier de Matons|1967|1pp=23–25|Garland|1999|2pp=11–39}} Women participated in public life, engaging in social events and protests.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=40|Karras|2004|2p=310}} Women's rights were not better in comparable societies, Western Europe or America until the 19th century.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=529|Harris|2017|2p=133}}


=== Language ===
By 1025, the date of Basil II's death, the Byzantine Empire stretched from ] in the east to ] in Southern Italy in the west.<ref name="Browning-1992-116"/> Many successes had been achieved, ranging from the conquest of Bulgaria to the annexation of parts of ] and Armenia, and the reconquest of Crete, Cyprus, and the important city of Antioch. These were not temporary tactical gains but long-term reconquests.<ref name="Browning-1992-96"/>
{{further||Languages of the Roman Empire}}
{{Multiple image
| align = right
| image1 = Mudil_Psalter.jpg
| width1 = 140
| alt1 = A photograph of two pages of a book written in a Greek script. The lower portions of both pages are damaged.
| caption1 =
| image2 = Joshua_Roll.jpg
| width2 = 146
| alt2 = A photograph of an illustrated manuscript written in Greek. At the left are two people who are standing talking to a person who is seated, while 5 soldiers listen. At the right are a group of soldiers going somewhere.
| caption2 =
| footer = Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete ] in the Coptic language (], Egypt, ])<br />
Right: The ], a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople (], Rome)
}}


There was never an official language of the Empire, however, Latin and Greek were the main languages.{{sfnm|Rochette|2023|1p=285|Goldhill|2024|2p=850}} During the early years of the Roman Empire, educated nobles often relied on their knowledge of Greek to meet societal expectations, and knowledge of Latin was useful for a career in the military, government, or law.{{sfn|Dickey|2023|p=4}} In the east, Greek was the dominant language, a legacy of the ].{{sfnm|Rochette|2018|1p=108|Millar|2006|2pp=97–98|Treadgold|1997|3p=5–7}} Greek was also the language of the Christian Church and trade.{{sfnm|McDonnell|2006|1p=77|Millar|2006|2pp=97–98|Oikonomides|1999|3pp=12–13}}
Leo VI achieved the complete codification of Byzantine law in Greek. This monumental work of 60 volumes became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law and is still studied today.<ref name="Browning-1992-97-98">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=97–98}}.</ref> Leo also reformed the administration of the Empire, redrawing the borders of the administrative subdivisions (the '']'', or "Themes") and tidying up the system of ranks and privileges, as well as regulating the behaviour of the various trade guilds in Constantinople. Leo's reform did much to reduce the previous fragmentation of the Empire, which henceforth had one center of power, Constantinople.<ref name="Browning-1992-98-99">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=98–99}}.</ref> However, the increasing military success of the Empire greatly enriched and empowered the provincial nobility with respect to the peasantry, who were essentially reduced to a state of serfdom.<ref name="Browning-1992-98-109">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=98–109}}.</ref>


Most early emperors were bilingual but had a preference for Latin in the public sphere for political reasons, a practice that first started during the ].{{sfnm|Rochette|2023|1pp=263, 268|Rochette|2018|2pp=114–115, 118|Wallace-Hadrill|1998|3pp=80–83}} Classical languages expert Bruno Rochette claims Latin had experienced a period of spread from the second century{{Nbsp}}BC onwards, and especially so in the western provinces, but not as much in the eastern provinces with a change due to Diocletian's reforms: there was a decline in the knowledge of Greek in the west, and Latin was asserted as the language of power in the east.{{sfnm|Rochette|2011|1pp=560, 562–563|Rochette|2018|2p=109}}
Under the Macedonian emperors, the city of Constantinople flourished, becoming the largest and wealthiest city in Europe, with a population of approximately 400,000 in the 9th and 10th centuries.<ref>{{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=130–131}}; {{harvnb|Pounds|1979|p=124}}.</ref> During this period, the Byzantine Empire employed a strong civil service staffed by competent aristocrats that oversaw the collection of taxes, domestic administration, and foreign policy. The Macedonian emperors also increased the Empire's wealth by fostering trade with Western Europe, particularly through the sale of silk and metalwork.<ref>{{harvnb|Duiker|Spielvogel|2010|p=317}}.</ref>


] in light grey. ] in orange. ] in green. Green dots indicate Cappadocian Greek-speaking villages in 1910.{{sfn|Dawkins|1916}}|alt=A map showing Pontic Greek dialects in Northern Turkey, Demotic Greek dialects in the west, and Cappadocian Greek dialects in the south.]]
==== Split between Orthodox Christianity and Catholicism (1054) ====
{{Further|East–West Schism}}
], 19th century, ], Bulgaria]]


Despite this, Greek's influence gradually grew in the government, beginning when ] in 397{{Nbsp}}AD allowed judges to issue decisions in Greek, ] in 439 expanded its use in legal procedures, the first law in Greek was issued in 448, and when ] legislated in the language in the 460s.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=191|Rochette|2023|2p=283|Rochette|2011|3p=562|Wickham|2009|4p=90}} ]'s '']'', a compilation of mostly Roman jurists, was written almost entirely in Latin; however, the laws issued after 534, from Justinian's ] onwards, were in both Greek and Latin, which marks the year when the government officially began to use the former language.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=289|Rochette|2011|2p=562|Rochette|2023|3p=283}}
The Macedonian period also included events of momentous religious significance. The conversion of the Bulgarians, Serbs and ] to Orthodox Christianity permanently changed the religious map of Europe and still resonates today. ], two ] brothers from Thessaloniki, contributed significantly to the ] and in the process devised the ], ancestor to the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Timberlake|2004|p=14}}.</ref>


Historian ] states that Greek for a time became ] with the spoken language, known as ] (later, ]), used alongside an older written form (]) until ] won out as the spoken and written standard.{{sfn|Oikonomides|1999|pp=12–13}} Latin fragmented into the incipient ] in the 8th century, following the collapse of the Western Empire after the Muslim invasions broke the connection between speakers.{{sfn|Pei|Gaeng|1976|pages=76–81}}{{sfn|Sedlar|1994|pp=403–440}} During the reign of Justinian ({{Reign| 527|565}}), Latin disappeared in the east, though it may have lingered in the military until ] ({{Reign|610|641}}).{{sfnm|Apostolides|1887|1pp=25–26|Rochette|2023|2p=283|Rance|2010|3pp=63–64}} Historian ] claims contact with Western Europe in the 10th century revived Latin studies, and by the 11th century, knowledge of Latin was no longer unusual in Constantinople.{{sfn|Runciman|1933|page=232}}
In 1054, relations between the Eastern and Western traditions within the Christian Church reached a terminal crisis, known as the ]. Although there was a formal declaration of institutional separation, on July 16, when three papal legates entered the Hagia Sophia during Divine Liturgy on a Saturday afternoon and placed a bull of excommunication on the altar,<ref>{{harvnb|Patterson|1995|p=15}}.</ref> the so-called Great Schism was actually the culmination of centuries of gradual separation.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=83}}.</ref>


Many other languages are attested in the Empire, not just in Constantinople but also at its frontiers.{{sfnm|Oikonomides|1999|1p=20|Harris|2014|2p=12}} They include ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]; these were typically the languages of the lower strata of the population and the illiterate, who were the vast majority.{{sfnm|Beaton|1996|1p=10|Jones|1986|2pp=991–997|Versteegh|1977|3p=1|Harris|2014|4p=12}} The Empire initially was a multi-lingual state, and although Greek bound everyone, there was a decline in the diversity of its peoples' languages over time.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2007|1p=95|Nicol|1993|2pp=1–2}}
=== Crisis and fragmentation ===
The Empire soon fell into a period of difficulties, caused to a large extent by the undermining of the theme system and the neglect of the military. Nikephoros II, John Tzimiskes, and Basil II changed the military divisions ({{lang|grc|τάγματα}}, '']'') from a rapid response, primarily defensive, citizen army into a professional, campaigning army, increasingly manned by ]. Mercenaries were expensive, however, and as the threat of invasion receded in the 10th century, so did the need for maintaining large garrisons and expensive fortifications.<ref>{{harvnb|Treadgold|1997|pp=548–549}}.</ref> Basil II left a burgeoning treasury upon his death, but he neglected to plan for his succession. None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent and the administration of the Empire increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Efforts to revive the Byzantine economy only resulted in ] and a debased gold coinage. The army was now seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. Native troops were therefore cashiered and replaced by foreign mercenaries on specific contract.<ref name="PM">Markham, "".</ref>

At the same time, the Empire was faced with new enemies. Provinces in southern Italy faced the ], who arrived in Italy at the beginning of the 11th century. During a period of strife between Constantinople and Rome culminating in the ] of 1054, the Normans began to advance, slowly but steadily, into Byzantine Italy.<ref>{{harvnb|Vasiliev|1928–1935}}, "".</ref> ], the capital of the ] of Calabria, was captured in 1060 by ], followed by ] in 1068. Bari, the main Byzantine stronghold in Apulia, was besieged in August 1068 and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Hooper|Bennett|1996|p=82}}; {{harvnb|Stephenson|2000|p=157}}.</ref> The Byzantines also lost their influence over the ]n coastal cities to ] (r. 1058–1074/1075) in 1069.<ref>{{harvnb|Šišić|1990}}.</ref>

] (1031) by the Byzantines under ] and the counterattack by the ]]]

The greatest disaster took place in Asia Minor, however, where the ] made their first explorations across the Byzantine frontier into Armenia in 1065 and 1067. The emergency lent weight to the military aristocracy in Anatolia, who in 1068 secured the election of one of their own, ], as emperor. In the summer of 1071, Romanos undertook a massive eastern campaign to draw the Seljuks into a general engagement with the Byzantine army. At the ], Romanos suffered a surprise defeat by ] ], and he was captured. Alp Arslan treated him with respect and imposed no harsh terms on the Byzantines.<ref name="PM"/> In Constantinople, however, a coup put in power ], who soon faced the opposition of ] and ]. By 1081, the Seljuks had expanded their rule over virtually the entire Anatolian plateau from Armenia in the east to ] in the west, and they had founded their capital at ], just {{convert|90|km|0|abbr=off}} from Constantinople.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Byzantine Empire|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica|year=2002}}; Markham, "".</ref>

=== Komnenian dynasty and the crusaders ===
{{See also|Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty|Komnenian restoration}}
], founder of the ]]]

During the Komnenian, or Comnenian, period from about 1081 to about 1185, the five emperors of the ] (Alexios I, John II, Manuel I, Alexios II, and Andronikos I) presided over a sustained, though ultimately incomplete, restoration of the military, territorial, economic, and political position of the Byzantine Empire.<ref name="Browning-1992-190">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=190}}.</ref> Although the Seljuk Turks occupied the heartland of the Empire in Anatolia, most Byzantine military efforts during this period were directed against Western powers, particularly the ].<ref name="Browning-1992-190"/>

The Empire under the Komnenoi played a key role in the history of the Crusades in the Holy Land, which Alexios I had helped bring about, while also exerting enormous cultural and political influence in Europe, the Near East, and the lands around the Mediterranean Sea under John and Manuel. Contact between Byzantium and the "Latin" West, including the Crusader states, increased significantly during the Komnenian period. Venetian and other Italian traders became resident in large numbers in Constantinople and the empire (there were an estimated 60,000 Latins in Constantinople alone, out of a population of three to four hundred thousand), and their presence together with the numerous Latin mercenaries who were employed by Manuel helped to spread Byzantine technology, art, literature and culture throughout the Latin West, while also leading to a flow of Western ideas and customs into the Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2006|pp=46}}.</ref>

In terms of prosperity and cultural life, the Komnenian period was one of the peaks in Byzantine history,<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2006|pp=42}}.</ref> and Constantinople remained the leading city of the Christian world in size, wealth, and culture.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2006|pp=47}}.</ref> There was a renewed interest in ], as well as an increase in literary output in vernacular Greek.<ref name="Browning-1992-190-218">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|pp=198–208}}.</ref> Byzantine art and literature held a pre-eminent place in Europe, and the cultural impact of Byzantine art on the west during this period was enormous and of long lasting significance.<ref name="Browning-1992-218">{{harvnb|Browning|1992|p=218}}.</ref>

==== Alexios I and the First Crusade ====
{{details|Alexios I Komnenos}}
{{See also|First Crusade}}
] before the ]]]

After Manzikert, a partial recovery (referred to as the Komnenian restoration) was made possible by the Komnenian dynasty.<ref name="M124">{{harvnb|Magdalino|2002|p=124}}.</ref> The first Komnenian emperor was ] (1057–1059), after which the ] held power (1059–81). The Komnenoi attained power again under Alexios I in 1081. From the outset of his reign, Alexios faced a formidable attack by the Normans under Robert Guiscard and his son ], who captured ] and ], and laid siege to ] in ]. Robert Guiscard's death in 1085 temporarily eased the Norman problem. The following year, the Seljuq sultan died, and the sultanate was split by internal rivalries. By his own efforts, Alexios defeated the ]; they were caught by surprise and annihilated at the ] on 28 April 1091.<ref name="Br">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Byzantine Empire|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref>

Having achieved stability in the West, Alexios could turn his attention to the severe economic difficulties and the disintegration of the Empire's traditional defences.<ref name=Birkenmeier>{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002}}.</ref> However, he still did not have enough manpower to recover the lost territories in Asia Minor and to advance against the Seljuks. At the ] in 1095, envoys from Alexios spoke to ] about the suffering of the Christians of the East, and underscored that without help from the West they would continue to suffer under Muslim rule.<ref name=Harris>{{harvnb|Harris|2014}}; {{harvnb|Read|2000|p=124}}; {{harvnb|Watson|1993|p=12}}.</ref>

] mint, opened by Alexios in September 1081, on his way to confront the invading Normans under Robert Guiscard]]

Urban saw Alexios's request as a dual opportunity to cement Western Europe and reunite the ] with the ] under his rule.<ref name="Harris"/> On 27 November 1095, Pope Urban II called together the ], and urged all those present to take up arms under the sign of the ] and launch an armed ] to recover Jerusalem and the East from the Muslims. The response in Western Europe was overwhelming.<ref name="Br"/>

Alexios had anticipated help in the form of mercenary forces from the West, but he was totally unprepared for the immense and undisciplined force that soon arrived in Byzantine territory. It was no comfort to Alexios to learn that four of the eight leaders of the main body of the Crusade were Normans, among them Bohemund. Since the crusade had to pass through Constantinople, however, the Emperor had some control over it. He required its leaders to swear to restore to the empire any towns or territories they might reconquer from the Turks on their way to the Holy Land. In return, he gave them guides and a military escort.<ref name=A261>{{harvnb|Komnene|1928|loc=''Alexiad'', }}</ref>

Alexios was able to recover a number of important cities and islands, and in fact much of western Asia Minor. Nevertheless, the Catholic/Latin crusaders believed their oaths were invalidated when Alexios did not help them during the siege of Antioch (he had in fact set out on the road to Antioch but had been persuaded to turn back by ], who assured him that all was lost and that the expedition had already failed).<ref name="A291">{{harvnb|Komnene|1928|loc=''Alexiad'', }}</ref> Bohemund, who had set himself up as ], briefly went to war with the Byzantines, but he agreed to become Alexios' vassal under the ] in 1108, which marked the end of the Norman threat during Alexios' reign.<ref name="A348-358">{{harvnb|Komnene|1928|loc=''Alexiad'', }}; {{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=46}}.</ref>

==== John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade ====
{{Main|John II Komnenos|Manuel I Komnenos}}
] during the First Crusade]]

Alexios's son ] succeeded him in 1118 and ruled until 1143. John was a pious and dedicated Emperor who was determined to undo the damage to the empire suffered at the Battle of Manzikert, half a century earlier.<ref>{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=267}}.</ref> Famed for his piety and his remarkably mild and just reign, John was an exceptional example of a moral ruler at a time when cruelty was the norm.<ref>{{harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|p=377}}.</ref> For this reason, he has been called the Byzantine ].

During his twenty-five year reign, John made alliances with the ] in the West and decisively defeated the ] at the ].<ref name="B90">{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=90}}.</ref> He thwarted Hungarian and Serbian threats during the 1120s, and in 1130 he allied himself with the ] ] against the Norman king ].{{sfn|Cinnamus|1976|pp=74–75}}

In the later part of his reign, John focused his activities on the East, personally leading numerous campaigns against the ] in ]. His campaigns fundamentally altered the balance of power in the East, forcing the Turks onto the defensive, while restoring many towns, fortresses, and cities across the peninsula to the Byzantines. He defeated the ] of ] and reconquered all of ], while forcing ], Prince of Antioch, to recognise Byzantine suzerainty. In an effort to demonstrate the Emperor's role as the leader of the Christian world, John marched into the ] at the head of the combined forces of the Empire and the ]; yet despite his great vigour pressing the campaign, his hopes were disappointed by the treachery of his Crusader allies.<ref>{{harvnb|Harris|2014|p=84}}.</ref> In 1142, John returned to press his claims to Antioch, but he died in the spring of 1143 following a hunting accident. Raymond was emboldened to invade Cilicia, but he was defeated and forced to go to Constantinople to beg mercy from the new Emperor.<ref name="B326">{{harvnb|Brooke|1962|p=326}}.</ref>

]]]

John's chosen heir was his fourth son, ], who campaigned aggressively against his neighbours both in the west and in the east. In Palestine, Manuel allied with the Crusader ] and sent a large fleet to participate in a combined invasion of ]. Manuel reinforced his position as overlord of the Crusader states, with his hegemony over Antioch and Jerusalem secured by agreement with ], Prince of Antioch, and ], King of Jerusalem.<ref name="S">{{harvnb|Magdalino|2002|p=74}}.</ref> In an effort to restore Byzantine control over the ports of southern Italy, he sent an expedition to Italy in 1155, but disputes within the coalition led to the eventual failure of the campaign. Despite this military setback, Manuel's armies successfully invaded the Southern parts of ] in 1167, defeating the Hungarians at the ]. By 1168, nearly the whole of the eastern Adriatic coast lay in Manuel's hands.<ref name="S372">{{harvnb|Sedlar|1994|p=372}}.</ref> Manuel made several alliances with the Pope and Western Christian kingdoms, and he successfully handled the passage of the ] through his empire.<ref name="M67">{{harvnb|Magdalino|2002|p=67}}.</ref>

In the east, however, Manuel suffered a major defeat in 1176 at the ], against the Turks. Yet the losses were quickly recovered, and in the following year Manuel's forces inflicted a defeat upon a force of "picked Turks".<ref name="B129">{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=128}}.</ref> The Byzantine commander John Vatatzes, who destroyed the Turkish invaders at the ], not only brought troops from the capital but also was able to gather an army along the way, a sign that the Byzantine army remained strong and that the defensive program of western Asia Minor was still successful.<ref name="B196">{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=196}}.</ref>

==== 12th-century Renaissance ====
{{details|Byzantine civilisation in the twelfth century}}
{{See also|Komnenian Byzantine army}}
] in Nerezi near Skopje; it is considered a superb example of 12th-century ] art]]

John and Manuel pursued active military policies, and both deployed considerable resources on sieges and on city defences; aggressive fortification policies were at the heart of their imperial military policies.<ref name="B185-186">{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|pp=185–186}}.</ref> Despite the defeat at Myriokephalon, the policies of Alexios, John and Manuel resulted in vast territorial gains, increased frontier stability in Asia Minor, and secured the stabilisation of the Empire's European frontiers. From c. 1081 to c. 1180, the Komnenian army assured the Empire's security, enabling Byzantine civilisation to flourish.<ref name="Br1">{{harvnb|Birkenmeier|2002|p=1}}.</ref>

This allowed the Western provinces to achieve an economic revival that continued until the close of the century. It has been argued that Byzantium under the Komnenian rule was more prosperous than at any time since the Persian invasions of the 7th century. During the 12th century, population levels rose and extensive tracts of new agricultural land were brought into production. Archaeological evidence from both Europe and Asia Minor shows a considerable increase in the size of urban settlements, together with a notable upsurge in new towns. Trade was also flourishing; the Venetians, the ] and others opened up the ports of the Aegean to commerce, shipping goods from the Crusader kingdoms of ] and Fatimid Egypt to the west and trading with the Empire via Constantinople.<ref name="Day">{{harvnb|Day|1977|pp=289–290}}; {{harvnb|Harvey|2003}}.</ref>

In artistic terms, there was a revival in ], and regional schools of architecture began producing many distinctive styles that drew on a range of cultural influences.<ref name=Diehl>{{harvnb|Diehl|1948}}.</ref> During the 12th century, the Byzantines provided their model of early ] as a renaissance of interest in classical authors. In ], Byzantine humanism found its most characteristic expression.<ref name="TM">{{harvnb|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=110}}.</ref> In philosophy, there was resurgence of classical learning not seen since the 7th century, characterised by a significant increase in the publication of commentaries on classical works.<ref name="Browning-1992-190-218"/> In addition, the first transmission of classical Greek knowledge to the West occurred during the Komnenian period.<ref name="Browning-1992-218"/>

=== Decline and disintegration ===
{{Main|Decline of the Byzantine Empire}}

==== Dynasty of the Angeloi ====
{{Main|Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty}}
]
Manuel's death on 24 September 1180 left his 11-year-old son ] on the throne. Alexios was highly incompetent at the office, but it was his mother, ], and her Frankish background that made his regency unpopular.<ref name="Norwich291">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=291}}.</ref> Eventually, ], a grandson of Alexios I, launched a revolt against his younger relative and managed to overthrow him in a violent ''coup d'état''.<ref name="Norwich292">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=292}}.</ref> Utilizing his good looks and his immense popularity with the army, he marched on to Constantinople in August 1182 ].<ref name="Norwich292"/> After eliminating his potential rivals, he had himself crowned as co-emperor in September 1183. He eliminated Alexios II, and took his 12-year-old wife ] for himself.<ref name="Norwich292"/>

Andronikos began his reign well; in particular, the measures he took to reform the government of the Empire have been praised by historians. According to ], Andronikos was determined to root out corruption: Under his rule, the sale of offices ceased; selection was based on merit, rather than favouritism; officials were paid an adequate salary so as to reduce the temptation of bribery. In the provinces, Andronikos's reforms produced a speedy and marked improvement.<ref name="M194"/> The aristocrats were infuriated against him, and to make matters worse, Andronikos seems to have become increasingly unbalanced; executions and violence became increasingly common, and his reign turned into a reign of terror.<ref>{{harvnb|Harris|2014|p=118}}.</ref> Andronikos seemed almost to seek the extermination of the aristocracy as a whole. The struggle against the aristocracy turned into wholesale slaughter, while the Emperor resorted to ever more ruthless measures to shore up his regime.<ref name="M194">{{harvnb|Ostrogorsky|1969|p=397}}.</ref>

Despite his military background, Andronikos failed to deal with ], ] (r. 1172–1196) who reincorporated Croatian territories into Hungary, and ] (r. 1166–1196) who declared his independence from the Byzantine Empire. Yet, none of these troubles would compare to ]'s (r. 1166–1189) invasion force of 300 ships and 80,000 men, arriving in 1185.<ref name="Norwich293">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=293}}.</ref> Andronikos mobilised a small fleet of 100 ships to defend the capital, but other than that he was indifferent to the populace. He was finally overthrown when ], surviving an imperial assassination attempt, seized power with the aid of the people and had Andronikos killed.<ref name="Norwich294-295">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|pp=294–295}}.</ref>

The reign of Isaac II, and more so that of his brother ], saw the collapse of what remained of the centralised machinery of Byzantine government and defence. Although the Normans were driven out of Greece, in 1186 the ] and Bulgars began a rebellion that led to the formation of the ]. The internal policy of the Angeloi was characterised by the squandering of the public treasure and fiscal maladministration. Imperial authority was severely weakened, and the growing power vacuum at the center of the Empire encouraged fragmentation. There is evidence that some Komnenian heirs had set up a semi-independent state in ] before 1204.<ref name="AP">{{harvnb|Angold|1997}}; {{harvnb|Paparrigopoulos|Karolidis|1925|p=216}}</ref> According to ], "the dynasty of the Angeloi, Greek in its origin,&nbsp;... accelerated the ruin of the Empire, already weakened without and disunited within."<ref name="VA">{{harvnb|Vasiliev|1928–1935}}, "".</ref>

==== Fourth Crusade ====
{{details|Fourth Crusade}}

] (1840).]]

In 1198, ] broached the subject of a new crusade through ] and ].<ref name="Norwich299">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=299}}.</ref> The stated intent of the crusade was to conquer ], now the centre of Muslim power in the ]. The crusader army that arrived at ] in the summer of 1202 was somewhat smaller than had been anticipated, and there were not sufficient funds to pay the Venetians, whose fleet was hired by the crusaders to take them to Egypt. Venetian policy under the ageing and blind but still ambitious ] ] was potentially at variance with that of the Pope and the crusaders, because Venice was closely related commercially with Egypt.<ref name="Br4Cr">{{cite encyclopedia|title=The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople|encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref> The crusaders accepted the suggestion that in lieu of payment they assist the Venetians in the capture of the (Christian) port of ] in ] (vassal city of Venice, which had rebelled and placed itself under Hungary's protection in 1186).<ref name="BrC">Britannica Concise, .</ref> The city fell in November 1202 after a brief ].<ref>{{harvnb|Geoffrey of Villehardouin|1963|p=46}}.</ref> Innocent, who was informed of the plan but his veto disregarded, was reluctant to jeopardise the Crusade, and gave conditional absolution to the crusaders—not, however, to the Venetians.<ref name="Br4Cr" />

After the death of ], the leadership of the Crusade passed to ], a friend of the ] ]. Both Boniface and Philip had married into the Byzantine Imperial family. In fact, Philip's brother-in-law, ], son of the deposed and blinded Emperor ], had appeared in Europe seeking aid and had made contacts with the crusaders. Alexios offered to reunite the Byzantine church with Rome, pay the crusaders 200,000 silver marks, join the crusade and provide all the supplies they needed to get to Egypt.<ref name="Norwich301">{{harvnb|Norwich|1998|p=301}}.</ref> Innocent was aware of a plan to divert the Crusade to Constantinople and forbade any attack on the city, but the papal letter arrived after the fleets had left Zara.

==== Crusader sack of Constantinople (1204) ====
{{Further|Siege of Constantinople (1203)|Siege of Constantinople (1204)}}
], c. 1204.]]

The crusaders arrived at Constantinople in the summer of 1203 and quickly attacked, started a major fire that damaged large parts of the city, and briefly seized control. Alexios III fled from the capital, and Alexios Angelos was elevated to the throne as ] along with his blind father Isaac. However, Alexios IV and Isaac II were unable to keep their promises and were deposed by Alexios V. The crusaders again took the city on 13 April 1204, and Constantinople was subjected to pillage and massacre by the rank and file for three days. Many priceless icons, relics, and other objects later turned up in ], a large number in Venice. According to Choniates, a ] was even set up on the Patriarchal throne.<ref name="NC">{{harvnb|Choniates|1912}}, ''''.</ref> When Innocent III heard of the conduct of his crusaders, he castigated them in no uncertain terms. But the situation was beyond his control, especially after his legate, on his own initiative, had absolved the crusaders from their vow to proceed to the Holy Land.<ref name="Br4Cr"/> When order had been restored, the crusaders and the Venetians proceeded to implement their agreement; ] was elected Emperor of a new ], and the Venetian ] was chosen as Patriarch. The lands divided up among the leaders included most of the former Byzantine possessions, though resistance would continue through the Byzantine remnants of the ], ], and ].<ref name="Br4Cr" /> Although Venice was more interested in commerce than conquering territory, it took key areas of Constantinople, and the Doge took the title of "''Lord of a Quarter and Half a Quarter of the Roman Empire''".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Norwich|title=A History of Venice|isbn=978-0-14-101383-1|pages=127–143}}</ref>

=== Fall ===

==== Empire in exile ====
{{details|Latinokratia}}
After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the ], and the ]. A third, the ], was created by ] a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople. Of the three successor states, Epirus and Nicaea stood the best chance of reclaiming Constantinople. The Nicaean Empire struggled to survive the next few decades, however, and by the mid-13th century it had lost much of southern Anatolia.<ref>{{harvnb|Kean|2006}}; {{harvnb|Madden|2005|p=162}}.</ref> The weakening of the ] following the ] allowed many ] and ] to set up their own principalities in Anatolia, weakening the Byzantine hold on Asia Minor.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Origins of the Ottoman Empire|year=1992|author=Mehmet Fuat Köprülü|others=Translated and edited by Gary Leiser|publisher=State University of New York Press|location=Albany|pages=33–41|isbn=0-7914-0819-1}}</ref> In time, one of the Beys, ], created an empire that would eventually conquer Constantinople. However, the Mongol invasion also gave Nicaea a temporary respite from Seljuk attacks, allowing it to concentrate on the Latin Empire to its north.

==== Reconquest of Constantinople ====
{{Main|Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty}}
]

The Empire of Nicaea, founded by the ], managed to ] from the Latins in 1261 and defeat Epirus. This led to a short-lived revival of Byzantine fortunes under ], but the war-ravaged Empire was ill-equipped to deal with the enemies that now surrounded it. To maintain his campaigns against the Latins, Michael pulled troops from Asia Minor and levied crippling taxes on the peasantry, causing much resentment.<ref>{{harvnb|Madden|2005|p=179}}; {{harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=260}}.</ref> Massive construction projects were completed in Constantinople to repair the damage of the Fourth Crusade, but none of these initiatives was of any comfort to the farmers in Asia Minor suffering raids from Muslim ghazis.

Rather than holding on to his possessions in Asia Minor, Michael chose to expand the Empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople.<ref>{{harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=257}}.</ref> The efforts of ] and later his grandson ] marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts in restoring the glory of the Empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II would often backfire, with the ] ravaging the countryside and increasing resentment towards Constantinople.<ref>{{harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=261}}.</ref>

==== Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople ====
{{Main|Byzantine–Ottoman Wars|Fall of Constantinople}}
] in 1453, according to a 15th-century French miniature.]]

The situation became worse for Byzantium during the civil wars after Andronikos III died. A ] devastated the empire, allowing the Serbian ruler ] (r. 1331–1346) to overrun most of the Empire's remaining territory and establish a ]. In 1354, an earthquake at ] devastated the fort, allowing the ] (who were hired as mercenaries during the civil war by ]) to establish themselves in Europe.<ref>{{harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=268}}.</ref> By the time the Byzantine civil wars had ended, the Ottomans had defeated the Serbians and subjugated them as vassals. Following the ], much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.<ref>{{harvnb|Reinert|2002|p=270}}.</ref>

The Byzantine emperors appealed to the West for help, but the Pope would only consider sending aid in return for a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox Church with the ]. Church unity was considered, and occasionally accomplished by imperial decree, but the Orthodox citizenry and clergy intensely resented the authority of Rome and the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=71–72}}.</ref> Some Western troops arrived to bolster the Christian defence of Constantinople, but most Western rulers, distracted by their own affairs, did nothing as the Ottomans picked apart the remaining Byzantine territories.<ref name="R84-85">{{harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=84–85}}.</ref>

Constantinople by this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, ]'s army of 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city.<ref name="R84-86">{{harvnb|Runciman|1990|pp=84–86}}.</ref> Despite a desperate last-ditch defence of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces (c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign),<ref name="R84-85"/> ] to the Ottomans after a two-month siege on 29 May 1453. The last Byzantine emperor, ], was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken.<ref>{{harvnb|Hindley|2004|p=300}}.</ref>

=== Political aftermath ===
]
By the time of the fall of Constantinople, the only remaining territory of the Byzantine Empire was the ] (]), which was ruled by brothers of the last Emperor, ] and ]. The Despotate continued on as an independent state by paying an annual tribute to the Ottomans. Incompetent rule, failure to pay the annual tribute and a revolt against the Ottomans finally led to Mehmed II's invasion of Morea in May 1460. Demetrios asked the Ottomans to invade and drive Thomas out. Thomas fled. The Ottomans moved through the Morea and conquered virtually the entire Despotate by the summer. Demetrios thought the Morea would be restored to him to rule, but it was incorporated into the Ottoman fold.

A few holdouts remained for a time. The island of ] refused to surrender and it was first ruled for a short time by an Aragonese corsair. When the population drove him out they obtained the consent of Thomas to place themselves under the Pope's protection before the end of 1460. The ], on the Morea's south end, resisted under a loose coalition of the local clans and then that area came under Venice's rule. The very last holdout was ], in the Morea's northwest. ] was the military commander there, stationed at ]. While the town eventually surrendered, Graitzas and his garrison and some town residents held out in the castle until July 1461, when they escaped and reached Venetian territory.<ref>{{harvnb|Miller|1907|loc=}}</ref>

] under the Palaiologoi, sporting the ] symbol of the ].]]

The ], which had split away from the Byzantine Empire just weeks before Constantinople was taken by the Crusaders in 1204, became the last remnant and last de facto successor state to the Byzantine Empire. Efforts by the ] to recruit European powers for an anti-Ottoman crusade provoked war between the Ottomans and Trebizond in the summer of 1461. After a month-long siege, David surrendered the city of Trebizond on 14 August 1461. The Empire of Trebizond's Crimean principality, the ] (part of the ]), lasted another 14 years, falling to the Ottomans in 1475.

A nephew of the last Emperor, Constantine XI, ] claimed to have inherited the title of ]. He lived in the Morea until its fall in 1460, then escaped to Rome where he lived under the protection of the ] for the remainder of his life. Since the office of emperor had never been technically hereditary, Andreas' claim would have been without merit under Byzantine law. However, the Empire had vanished, and Western states generally followed the Roman-church-sanctioned principles of hereditary sovereignty. Seeking a life in the west, Andreas styled himself ''Imperator Constantinopolitanus'' ("Emperor of Constantinople"), and sold his succession rights to both ] and the ]. However, no one ever invoked the title after Andreas's death.

] died without producing an heir, and had Constantinople not fallen he might have been succeeded by the sons of his deceased elder brother, who were taken into the palace service of Mehmed II after the fall of Constantinople. The oldest boy, re-christened as Has Murad, became a personal favorite of Mehmed and served as Beylerbey (Governor-General) of the Balkans. The younger son, renamed ], became Admiral of the Ottoman fleet and Sancak Beg (Governor) of the Province of Gallipoli. He eventually served twice as Grand Vizier under Mehmed's son, ].<ref>Lowry, Heath W. (2003). ''The Nature of the Early Ottoman State''. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. p.&nbsp;115–116.</ref>

Mehmed II and his successors continued to consider themselves heirs to the Roman Empire until ] in the early 20th century. They considered that they had simply shifted its religious basis as Constantine had done before, and they continued to refer to their conquered Eastern Roman inhabitants (]) as ]. Meanwhile, the ] (whose rulers also considered themselves the heirs of the Eastern Roman Emperors<ref>{{harvnb|Clark|2000|p=213}}.</ref>) harboured Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles.

At his death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by ], ] of ]. He had married Andreas' sister, ], whose grandson, ], would become the first ] of Russia (''tsar'', or ''czar'', meaning ''caesar'', is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine Emperors). Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the ] as the successive ] was kept alive until its demise with the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Seton-Watson|1967|p=31}}</ref>


== Economy == == Economy ==
{{details|Byzantine economy}} {{main|Byzantine economy}}
{{Byzantine culture}} {{Further|Byzantine silk|Sino-Roman relations}}
The Empire's geographic and maritime advantages reduced the costs of transporting goods and facilitated trade, making it a key driver of economic growth from antiquity and through the post-classical period.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=473|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=13}} Infrastructure, including roads, public buildings, and the legal system, supported trade and other economic activities.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|p=24}} Regions like Asia Minor, the Aegean islands, Egypt, the Levant, and Africa thrived as mature economic centres despite political challenges and military insecurities.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=467|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=246}} From the mid-6th century onward, however, plagues, invasions, and wars caused populations and economies to decline significantly, leading to the collapse of the ancient economy.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=472, 474, 479|Laiou|2002c|2p=698|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=24}} Major cities like Constantinople, Antioch, ], and ] continued to support substantial populations exceeding 100,000, while the countryside transitioned into fortified settlements.{{sfnm|Laiou|2002a|1p=177|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=25-26}} These rural areas developed into hamlets and villages, reflecting an economic shift between historical periods toward more efficient land use.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=465, 471|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=25-26, 232}}
The Byzantine economy was among the most advanced in ] and the ] for many centuries. Europe, in particular, could not match Byzantine economic strength until late in the ]. ] operated as a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of ] and ], in particular as the primary western terminus of the famous ]. Until the first half of the 6th century and in sharp contrast with the decaying West, the Byzantine economy was flourishing and resilient.<ref>{{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=1, 23–38}}.</ref>


Low population density prompted emperors to encourage migration and resettlement, stimulating agriculture and demographic growth.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|pp=44-46}} By the 9th century, the economy began to revive, marked by increased agricultural production and urban expansion.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=473-474|Laiou|2002a|2pp=269-270}} Advances in science, technical knowledge, and literacy gave the Empire a competitive edge over its neighbors.{{sfn|Laiou|Morrisson|2007|pp=19-22, 24}} The 11th and 12th centuries saw the continued rapid population growth, marking the peak of this revival.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=476|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=90-92}} Meanwhile, Italian merchants, particularly the Venetians, Genoese, and Pisans, took control of international trade, thus reducing the influence of native merchants.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1pp=473-476|Laiou|2002a|2pp=25, 402}} The political system grew increasingly extractive and authoritarian, contributing to the Empire's collapse in 1204.{{sfnm|Laiou|2002a|1p=23|Laiou|2002b|2p=1164|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=233}}
The ] and the ] would represent a substantial reversal of fortunes contributing to a period of stagnation and ]. Isaurian reforms and, in particular, ]'s repopulation, public works and tax measures, marked the beginning of a revival that continued until 1204, despite territorial contraction.<ref>{{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=3, 45, 49–50, 231}}; {{harvnb|Magdalino|2002|p=532}}.</ref> From the 10th century until the end of the 12th, the Byzantine Empire projected an image of luxury and travellers were impressed by the wealth accumulated in the capital.<ref name="M532">{{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|pp=90–91, 127, 166–169, 203–204}}; {{harvnb|Magdalino|2002|p=535}}.</ref>


The fall of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204 destroyed its wealth, led to the confiscation of large landholdings and the fragmentation of the Empire into smaller rump states, making governance inefficient and increasing the costs of doing business.{{sfnm|Magdalino|2002b|1p=535|Kaldellis|2023|2p=739|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3pp=167-168}} The state gradually lost its control over trade practices, price regulations, the outflow of precious metals, and possibly even the minting of coins.{{Sfn|Matschke|2002|pp=805–806}} Italian merchants further dominated trade as the events of 1204 opened the Black Sea to Western merchants, permanently altering the Empire's fortunes.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=477|Matschke|2002|2pp=771-772|3a1=Laiou|3a2=Morrisson|3y=2007|3p=203}} Farmers and other economic agents increasingly produced goods for local use and were affected by the insecurity of constant warfare.{{sfnm|Matschke|2002|1p=779|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2p=168}} Despite these challenges, the Empire's mixed economy — characterised by state interventions, public works, and market liberalisation — remained a model of medieval economic adaptability, even as it deteriorated under external pressures.{{sfnm|Whittow|2009|1p=471|2a1=Laiou|2a2=Morrisson|2y=2007|2pp=232-235}}
The ] resulted in the disruption of Byzantine manufacturing and the commercial dominance of the Western Europeans in the ], events that amounted to an economic catastrophe for the Empire.<ref name="M532"/> The ] tried to revive the economy, but the late Byzantine state would not gain full control of either the foreign or domestic economic forces. Gradually, it also lost its influence on the modalities of trade and the price mechanisms, and its control over the outflow of precious metals and, according to some scholars, even over the minting of coins.<ref name="M806">{{harvnb|Matschke|2002|pp=805–806}}.</ref>


==Daily life==
One of the economic foundations of Byzantium was trade, fostered by the maritime character of the Empire. Textiles must have been by far the most important item of export; silks were certainly imported into Egypt, and appeared also in Bulgaria, and the West.<ref name="L723">{{harvnb|Laiou|2002|p=723}}; {{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=13}}.</ref> The state strictly controlled both the internal and the international trade, and retained the monopoly of issuing ], maintaining a durable and flexible monetary system adaptable to trade needs.<ref name="L3-4">
{{harvnb|Laiou|2002|pp=3–4}}; {{harvnb|Laiou|Morisson|2007|p=18}}.
</ref>


=== Clothing ===
The government attempted to exercise formal control over interest rates, and set the parameters for the activity of the ]s and corporations, in which it had a special interest. The emperor and his officials intervened at times of crisis to ensure the provisioning of the capital, and to keep down the price of cereals. Finally, the government often collected part of the surplus through taxation, and put it back into circulation, through redistribution in the form of salaries to state officials, or in the form of investment in public works.<ref name="L3-4"/>
{{Main|Byzantine dress}}
Historical evidence of Byzantine dress is scant. However, it is known that the court had a distinguishable dress, while non-elite men and women observed certain conventions of clothing.{{sfnm|Shepard|2009|1p=69|Ball|2005|2p=4|Dawson|2006|3pp=41,43}} Fashion trends started in the provinces, and not in the capital, which was more conservative.{{sfn|Ball|2005|pp=57, 75-76, 118-119}} The imperial dress was centred around the '']'', '']'' and crown which represented the empire and the court.{{sfn|Ball|2005|pp=35, 177}} The ''loros'' derived from the ], a ceremonial toga worn by consuls. It was more prominent in the early empire, indicating a continuation of the traditions of the Roman Empire.{{sfn|Ball|2005|pp=12, 29}} Historian Jennifer Ball claims that the '']'' cloak was like a modern-day business suit, which originated with the military, and was an evolution of the '']'' cloak worn by aristocratic men including the emperor during the early empire.{{sfnm|Ball|2005|1pp=24, 30, 32, 34|Dawson|2006|2p=43}} In the middle empire, dresses replaced the tunic for women.{{sfn|Ball|2005|p=9}} The late empire saw the larger influence on Byzantine dress of non-Greek cultures like the Italians (Genoese, Venetian), Turks (Ottomans) and Bulgarians.{{sfn|Ball|2005|p=6}}


=== Cuisine ===
== Science, medicine and law ==
{{See also|Byzantine science|Byzantine medicine|Byzantine law}} {{Main|Byzantine cuisine}}
Feasting was a major part of Byzantine culture and included the use of clean tables and forks. Modern Italian standards of gastronomy are likely to have been influenced by this era.{{Sfnm|Ash|1995|1p=244|Bryer|2008|2p=673-675|Decker|2008|3p=496}} Foods which are contemporary in the modern world are, among others, a cured meat called ], ], ] cheese, salt roe similar to the modern ], black sea caviar, fermented ], ], ]des, and the soup '']''.{{Sfnm|Ash|1995|1p=244|Davidson|2014|2p=123|Bryer|2008|3p=671|Faas|2005|4p=184-185|Vryonis|1971|5p=482 |Salaman|1986|6p=184}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=2014-10-17 |website=Internet History Sourcebooks Project, Fordham University |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/liudprand1.asp |page=47 |access-date=2024-12-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141017151834/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/liudprand1.asp |archive-date=17 October 2014 |title=Medieval Sourcebook: Liutprand of Cremona: Report of his Mission to Constantinople}}</ref> Fruits unknown from classical times which were added to Byzantine diets included ] (eggplants) and oranges.{{Sfn|Davidson|2014|p=123}} There were famed medieval sweet wines such as the ] from ], the ], and the eponymous ] that were drunk, as were ] (known as ''boza'') and ].{{Sfnm|Bryer|2008|1pp=672-673|Unwin|2010|2p=185}}
], the patriarchal ] in Constantinople designed 537 CE by ], the first compiler of Archimedes' various works. The influence of Archimedes' principles of solid geometry is evident.]]


] played by the ] emperor ] in 480 and recorded by ] in {{Circa|530}} because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red), as he threw 2, 5 and 6 and was forced to leave eight pieces alone.{{Sfn|Horn|Schädler|2019}}|alt=A visualised depiction of a board game]]
The writings of ] never ceased to be cultivated in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was in every period closely connected with ], and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Anastos|1962|p=409}}.</ref> In the field of engineering ], the Greek mathematician and architect of the ], produced the first compilation of ] works c. 530, and it is through this tradition, kept alive by the school of mathematics and engineering founded c. 850 during the "Byzantine Renaissance" by ] that such works are known today (see ]).<ref>Alexander Jones, American Mathematical Society, May 2005.</ref> Indeed, geometry and its applications (architecture and engineering instruments of war) remained a specialty of the Byzantines.], which shows a set of seven famous physicians]] Though scholarship lagged during the dark years following the Arab conquests, during the so-called ''Byzantine Renaissance'' at the end of the first millennium Byzantine scholars re-asserted themselves becoming experts in the scientific developments of the Arabs and Persians, particularly in ] and ].<ref>{{harvnb|King|1991|pp=116–118}}.</ref> The Byzantines are also credited with ], particularly in architecture (e.g. the pendentive dome) and warfare technology (e.g. ]).


=== Recreation ===
Although at various times the Byzantines made magnificent achievements in the application of the ] (notably in the construction of the ]), and although they preserved much of the ancient knowledge of science and geometry, after the 6th century Byzantine scholars made few novel contributions to science in terms of developing new theories or extending the ideas of classical authors.<ref>{{harvnb|Cohen|1994|p=395}}; Dickson, .</ref>
] were held since the early era till 1204, becoming one of the world's longest continuous sporting events.{{sfnm|Jeffreys|2008a|1pp=681-682|Kaldellis|2023|2p=13, 138}} ], the ] and some wild-animal shows were prominent until the 6th century.{{sfn|Jeffreys|2008a|p=680}} Because Christian bishops and pagan philosophers did not like these activities, the state's funding for them ceased, leading to their decline and a shift to private entertainment and sporting.{{sfnm|Jeffreys|2008a|1pp=678-683|Kaldellis|2023|2p=187, 233}} A Persian version of Polo introduced by the Crusaders called ] was played by the nobility and urban aristocracy in major cities during the middle and late eras, along with the sport of jousting introduced from the West.{{Sfnm|Kazhdan|1991a|1p=2137, "Tzykanisterion" |Kazanaki-Lappa|2002|2p=643|Jeffreys |2008a|3p=683 |Kaldellis|2023|4pp=672, 844}} Over time, ] like ] became increasingly popular.{{Sfn|Jeffreys|2008a|p=683}}

In the final century of the Empire, Byzantine grammarians were those principally responsible for carrying, in person and in writing, ancient Greek grammatical and literary studies to early ].<ref>{{harvnb|Robins|1993|p=8}}.</ref> During this period, ] and other ] were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.<ref name="TM189">{{harvnb|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=189}}.</ref>

In the field of law, ]'s reforms had a clear effect on the evolution of ], and Leo III's ''Ecloga'' influenced the formation of legal institutions in the Slavic world.<ref>{{harvnb|Troianos|Velissaropoulou-Karakosta|1997|p=340}}</ref>
In the 10th century, ] achieved the complete codification of the whole of Byzantine law in Greek, which became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law, generating interest to the present day.<ref name="Browning-1992-97-98"/>


== Religion == == Religion ==
], which was completed in the short period of four and a half years (532–537)]]
{{main|State church of the Roman Empire}}
The Byzantine Empire was a ] ruled by God working through the Emperor. Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst argues, "The Byzantine Empire became a theocracy in the sense that Christian values and ideals were the foundation of the empire's political ideals and heavily entwined with its political goals."<ref>{{cite book|author=Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst|title=The Byzantine Empire|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RyOoBQiCm88C&pg=PA14|year=2012|publisher=Capstone|page=14}}</ref> Steven Runciman says in his book on ''The Byzantine Theocracy'' (2004):
:The constitution of the Byzantine Empire was based on the conviction that it was the earthly copy of the Kingdom of Heaven. Just as God ruled in Heaven, so the Emperor, made in his image, should rule on earth and carry out his commandments&nbsp;... It saw itself as a universal empire. Ideally, it should embrace all the peoples of the Earth who, ideally, should all be members of the one true Christian Church, its own Orthodox Church. Just as man was made in God's image, so man's kingdom on Earth was made in the image of the Kingdom of Heaven."<ref>Steven Runciman, ''The Byzantine Theocracy'' (2004) pp&nbsp;1–2, 162-63.</ref>
The survival of the Empire in the East assured an active role of the Emperor in the affairs of the Church. The Byzantine state inherited from pagan times the administrative, and financial routine of administering religious affairs, and this routine was applied to the ]. Following the pattern set by ], the Byzantines viewed the Emperor as a representative or messenger of ], responsible particularly for the propagation of Christianity among pagans, and for the "externals" of the religion, such as administration and finances. As ] points out, the Byzantine political thinking can be summarised in the motto "One God, one empire, one religion".<ref name="M108">{{harvnb|Mango|2007|p=108}}.</ref>


{{Main|Christianity as the Roman state religion}}
The imperial role in the affairs of the Church never developed into a fixed, legally defined system.<ref name="M14">{{harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=13}}.</ref> With the decline of Rome, and internal dissension in the other Eastern Patriarchates, the Church of Constantinople became, between the 6th and 11th centuries, the richest and most influential center of ].<ref name="M19">{{harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=19}}.</ref> Even when the Empire was reduced to only a shadow of its former self, the Church continued to exercise significant influence both inside and outside of the imperial frontiers. As ] points out:
{{see|History of Christianity|History of the Eastern Orthodox Church#Byzantine period|History of the Jews in the Byzantine Empire}}


The ] to all free Roman men in 212 fostered greater societal uniformity, particularly in religious practices.{{sfnm|Spawforth|1993|1p=254|Kaldellis|2023|2pp=19–20, 60, 71}}{{sfn|Ando|2011|loc=p. 46. Reviewed with commentary in {{harvnb|Kokkinia|2012}}}} Christianity, bolstered by ]'s support, began shaping all aspects of life.{{sfnm|Papaconstantinou|2016|1p=xxxii|Cameron|2016|2p=31|Cameron|2006b|3pp=544-551|Drake|2007|4pp=418, 422|Greatrex|2008|5p=236}} Subsequent emperors encouraged conversion and enacted laws in the late 4th century to restrict pagan activities.{{sfnm|Salzman|1993|1p=364|Drake|2007|2pp=412, 414, 425|Greatrex|2008|3p=236|4a1=Friell|4a2=Williams|4y=2005|4p=121|Kaldellis|2023|5p=178|Treadgold|1997|6pp=72, 94}} In 529, ] enforced conversions, specifically targeting ].{{Sfnm|Greatrex|2008|1p=236|Kaldellis|2023|2p=138|Salzman|1993|3p=364|Drake|2007|4p=425}} The confiscation of pagan treasures, diversion of funds, and legal discrimination led to the decline of paganism, resulting in events like the closure of schools of philosophy and the end of the ].{{efn|The historian Sofie Remijsen says there are several reasons to conclude that the Olympic games continued after Theodosius I, as the traditionally known terminal year of 393{{nbsp}}AD for the games is linked to his anti-pagan constitution. She argues that the games instead came to an end during the reign of Theodosius II, when a fire burned down the ].{{sfn|Remijsen|2015|pp=47–49}} The historian ] says there is a common misconception that the games were banned by an imperial decree. Kaldellis instead argues that the declining interest in chariot games, lack of funding (due to state policies) and hostility from zealots is what led to their end.{{Sfn|Kaldellis|2023|p=138}}}}{{Sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=25, 67–68, 179, 181, 340|Treadgold|1997|2pp=71, 252–253}} Christianity's debates increased the importance of Greek, making the emergent church dependent on branches of ] such as ].{{efn|Greek's importance grew larger, even though Hellenic culture had already influenced Roman identity immensely and the Greek language had been entrenched in the east since the Hellenistic era.{{Sfnm|Wallace-Hadrill|1998|1pp=79–91|Goldhill|2024|2pp=847–848|Rochette|2018 |3p=108|Millar|2006|4pp=97–98|Treadgold|1997|5pp=5–7}}}}{{Sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1pp=111, 180|Jones|1986 |2p=991|Treadgold|1997|3pp=27–28, 175–176}} Despite the transition, the historian Anthony Kaldellis views Christianity as "bringing no economic, social, or political changes to the state other than being more deeply integrated into it".{{sfn|Kaldellis|2023|pp=141, 186, 342}}
<blockquote>The ] remained the center of the Orthodox world, with subordinate ] and archbishoprics in the territory of Asia Minor and the Balkans, now lost to Byzantium, as well as in ], Russia and ]. The Church remained the most stable element in the Byzantine Empire.<ref name="M130">{{harvnb|Meyendorff|1982|p=130}}.</ref></blockquote>


]
The official state Christian doctrine was determined by the ], and it was then the emperor's duty to impose it to his subjects. An imperial decree of 388, which was later incorporated into the ''Codex Justinianus'', orders the population of the Empire "to assume the name of Catholic Christians", and regards all those who will not abide by the law as "mad and foolish persons"; as followers of "heretical dogmas".<ref>; {{harvnb|Blume|2008|loc=Headnote C. 1.1}}; {{harvnb|Mango|2007|p=108}}.</ref>


When the Roman state in the West politically collapsed, cultural differences began to divide the Christian churches of the East and West.{{sfnm|Brown|1976|1p=8|Löhr|2007|2p=9}} Internal disputes within the Eastern churches led to the migration of monastic communities to Rome, exacerbating tensions between Rome and Constantinople.{{sfnm|Kaldellis|2023|1p=390|Cameron|2017|2at=A United Church, chapter 1}} These disputes,{{efn|], one of the first major controversies, shook the Empire until it was addressed by the ].{{sfnm|1a1=Berndt|1a2=Steinacher|1y=2014|1pp=1-2, 8-19|2a1=Löhr|2y=2007|2p=14}} Other controversies persisted, leading to schisms, such as debates on the fundamental definitions of Christ's nature at the ] in 451.{{sfnm|Sabo|2018|1p=vi9|Löhr|2007|2p=14-23}}}} particularly in Egypt and the eastern Mediterranean, eventually split the church into three branches: ], Monophysite (Coptic), and ].{{sfnm|Adams|2021|1pp=366|Micheau|2006|2pp=373, 375}} The Chalcedonian group maintained dominance within the Empire’s territories, while the Monophysite and Nestorian branches largely fell under Muslim rule following the rise of Islam in the 7th century.{{sfn|Micheau|2006|pp=373-374, 376}}
Despite imperial decrees and the stringent stance of the ] itself, which came to be known as the ] or ], the latter never represented all Christians in Byzantium. Mango believes that, in the early stages of the Empire, the "mad and foolish persons", those labelled "]" by the state church, were the majority of the population.<ref name="M109">{{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=108–109}}.</ref> Besides the ], who existed until the end of the 6th century, and the ], there were many followers – sometimes even emperors – of various Christian doctrines, such as ], ], ], and ], whose teachings were in some opposition to the main theological doctrine, as determined by the Ecumenical Councils.<ref>{{harvnb|Blume|2008|loc=Headnote C. 1.1}}; {{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=108–109, 115–125}}.</ref>


Eastern patriarchs frequently sought the Papacy’s mediation in doctrinal and practical matters, but the pope’s authority was not universally acknowledged, even in nearby regions like Northern Italy.{{sfnm|CasidayNorris|2007a|1p=3|Nicholson|1960|2pp=54, 60}} By 600, the Slavic settlement of the Balkans disrupted communication between Rome and Constantinople, further widening the divide.{{Sfnm|Louth|2008|1p=47|Kolbaba|2008|2pp=214-215}} The Arab and Lombard invasions, and the increased ] presence, deepened this estrangement and intensified disputes over jurisdiction and authority between the two spiritual centres.{{Sfn|Kolbaba|2008|pp=213–215, 218-221}} Differences in ritual and theology, such as the use of ] and the ], along with divergences in ecclesiology — ] versus the authority of ] — and issues of mutual respect, contributed to the separation of Western Christianity from Eastern Christianity.{{Sfnm|Meyendorff|1979|1pp=95,97 101|Kolbaba|2008|2p=223}} This separation began as early as 597 and culminated more definitively in 1054 during the ].{{Sfnm|Brown|2008|1p=13|Kolbaba|2008|2p=223}}
Another division among Christians occurred, when Leo III ordered the destruction of icons throughout the Empire. This led to a ], which ended in mid-9th century with the restoration of icons. During the same period, a new wave of pagans emerged in the Balkans, originating mainly from Slavic people. These were gradually ], and by Byzantium's late stages, Eastern Orthodoxy represented most Christians and, in general, most people in what remained of the Empire.<ref name="M115">{{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=115–125}}.</ref>


In 1439, a proposed reunion between the Eastern and Western churches faced Eastern resistance, delaying its official publication in Constantinople until 1452.{{sfn|Dowley|2018|p=342}} This agreement was overturned the following year by the ] to the Ottoman Turks in 1453.{{sfnm|Dowley|2018|1p=342|Kitromilides|2006|2p=187}} The conquest of 1453 marked the destruction of the Church as the central institution of the Christian empire established by Constantine, isolating Greek-speaking Orthodoxy from the West and restricting its influence for nearly 150 years.{{sfnm|Kitromilides|2006|1pp=187, 191|Kenworthy|2008|2p=173}} Despite this, the Church survived in an altered form, and the spiritual and cultural influence of the Eastern Church, Constantinople, and ] the monastic peninsula has endured.{{sfn|Kenworthy|2008|p=173}}
Jews were a significant minority in the Byzantine state throughout its history, and, according to Roman law, they constituted a legally recognised religious group. In the early Byzantine period they were generally tolerated, but then periods of tensions and persecutions ensued. In any case, after the Arab conquests, the majority of Jews found themselves outside the Empire; those left inside the Byzantine borders apparently lived in relative peace from the 10th century onwards.<ref name="M114">{{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=111–114}}.</ref>


== Arts ==
Georgian monasteries first appear in ] and on Mount Olympos in northwestern Asia Minor in the second half of the ninth century, and from then on ] played an increasingly important role in the Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Whittow|1996|p=200}}.</ref>
===Art and architecture===
{{main|Byzantine art|Byzantine architecture}}
{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=340
| image1 = Spas vsederzhitel sinay.jpg
| image2 = Hosios Loukas Katholikon (nave, South-West squinch) - Baptism - detail 02.jpg
| image3 = Meister von Nerezi 001.jpg
| image4 = Ivoire Barberini - Musée du Louvre Objets d'art OA 9063 ; MND 211.jpg
| image5 = Hagia Sophia in Istanbul (focused on the original Roman building).jpg
| footer = Clockwise, from top left:
* ] icon, 6th-century, ]
* ] mosaics, detail, early 11th century
* ], an early 6th-century ivory diptych{{sfn|Cormack|2018|p=39}}
* The ] exterior
* ''Dead Christ and Mourners'', {{circa|1164}}, ]{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}}
}}


Subjects in ] were primarily ] and typically non-naturalistic in their representation.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ paras. 2 and 13}} Emerging from both the ] and ],{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=2|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=11–12}} many early examples were lost amid the ]; the fragmented mosaics of the 3rd-century ] are a unique exception.{{sfn|Rodley|1994|pp=12–14}} Such ], known for their ] style, became a hallmark of the empire, appearing with both secular and sacred themes in diverse places, including churches (]), the circus (]), and the ].{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=34|2a1=James|2y=2003|2loc=§ paras. 3–4}} The early 6th-century reign of Justinian I saw systemic developments: ] came to dominate and once-popular public marble and bronze ] fell out of favor due to ] associations.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=32–33, 56–57|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=14}} Justinian commissioned the monumental ] church, influential elements of which became architectural hallmarks for the empire: the immense size, massive ], innovative use of ]s and highly decorative interior was imitated as far north as the ] in ] and the ] in ].{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 10|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=33–40|3a1=Curl|3a2=Wilson|3y=2021|3loc=§ paras. 3 and 5}} The Hagia Sophia's creators, the engineer-architects ] and ], are uniqely esteemed;{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=67}} most Byzantine artists were unrecorded and typically deemed of little importance.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 7}}
== Art and literature ==
] display the more abstract and symbolic nature of Byzantine art.]]


Smaller-scale art flourished throughout the entire Byzantine period: costly ]s—often as diptychs (]) or triptychs (])—featured imperial commemorations or religious scenes and were particularly esteemed, as were ] and ]s.{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 4|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=39}} Other costly objects included ], which were lavishly illustrated for a wide range of texts, and ]s, often including the prized ], both of which became highly popular in Western Europe.{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ paras. 4–5}} The rise of small, portable ] paintings, used for both public and private religious worship, grew increasingly controversial.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=101–102|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2p=2}} During two periods of ] (726–843), possibly influenced by ],{{sfn|Lowden|1997|pp=147–148}} icons faced severe suppression and enormous amounts of figurative religious art was destroyed.{{sfn|Matthews|Platt|1997|p=185}} ]s condemned their use, likening them to pagan ] and ascribing recent ] as ] for their use, while ] supporters eventually prevailed, maintaining their essential use for ], considered distinct from ], and found precedent in ] references.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1pp=115–116|2a1=Lowden|2y=1997|2pp=147–151}}
{{Main|Byzantine art|Byzantine literature}}
{{See also|Byzantine dress}}


] (867–1056) saw a ], from which an unprecedentedly vast amount of artworks survive.{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=132|2a1=Lowden|2y=1997|2pp=187–188}} Subjects and styles became standardized, particularly ] churches, and already-existing frontality and ] evolved into a dominant artistic aesthetic, observable in the small ] enamel and the large mosaics of ], ], and ] monasteries.{{sfnm|1a1=James|1y=2003|1loc=§ para. 3|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=146–147}} The subsequent Komnenos-Angelos periods (1081–1204) saw increased imperial patronage, alongside figurative artwork of increased emotional expression (''Dead Christ and Mourners'', {{circa|1164}}; see right).{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}} Byzantine artistic influence spread widely to ] (the '']'') and Venice (mosaics of ]).{{sfn|James|2003|loc=§ para. 3}} Serbian churches flourished in particular, as three successive ]—] (1170–1282), ] (1282–1355), and ] (1355–1489)—combined a ] aesthetic with increasingly voluminous decorations and domes.{{sfn|Curl|Wilson|2021|loc=§ para. 7}} As smaller ] (1261–1453) gained ] status in Western Europe—many looted in the 1204 Fourth Crusade—they greatly influenced ] style of ], ], and later ], who is traditionally regarded by art historians as the inaugurator of ].{{sfnm|1a1=Rodley|1y=1994|1p=166|2a1=Cormack|2y=2018|2pp=159, 186|3a1=Andronikou|3y=2022|3pp=2–4}}
Surviving Byzantine art is mostly religious and with exceptions at certain periods is highly conventionalised, following traditional models that translate carefully controlled church theology into artistic terms. Painting in ], ]s and on wood panel and, especially in earlier periods, ] were the main media, and figurative ] very rare except for small ]. Manuscript painting preserved to the end some of the classical realist tradition that was missing in larger works.<ref>{{harvnb|Rice|1968}}; {{harvnb|Weitzmann|1982}}.</ref> Byzantine art was highly prestigious and sought-after in Western Europe, where it maintained a continuous influence on ] until near the end of the period. This was especially so in Italy, where Byzantine styles persisted in modified form through the 12th century, and became formative influences on ] art. But few incoming influences affected Byzantine style. By means of the expansion of the Eastern Orthodox church, Byzantine forms and styles spread to all the Orthodox world and beyond.<ref>{{harvnb|Rice|1968|loc=Chapters 15–17}}; {{harvnb|Weitzmann|1982|loc=Chapters 2–7}}; {{harvnb|Evans|2004|pp=389–555}}.</ref> Influences from Byzantine architecture, particularly in religious buildings, can be found in diverse regions from Egypt and Arabia to Russia and Romania.


=== Literature ===
In Byzantine literature, four different cultural elements are recognised: the ], the Christian, the ], and the Oriental. Byzantine literature is often classified in five groups: historians and annalists, encyclopaedists (Patriarch Photios, ], and ] are regarded as the greatest encyclopaedists of Byzantium) and essayists, and writers of secular poetry. The only genuine heroic epic of the Byzantines is the '']''. The remaining two groups include the new literary species: ecclesiastical and theological literature, and popular poetry.<ref name="Mango275–276">{{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=275–276}}.</ref>
{{main|Byzantine literature}}


] concerns all ] from the ].{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Although the Empire was ], the vast majority of extant texts are in ],{{sfn|Papaioannou|2021a|pp=1–2, 5–7}} albeit in two ] variants: a scholarly form based on ], and a ] based on ].{{sfn|Browning|1991a}} Most contemporary scholars consider all medieval Greek texts to be literature,{{sfn|Papaioannou|2021a|p=10}} but some offer varying constraints.{{sfnm|1a1=Kazhdan|1y=1999|1p=1|2a1=van Dieten|2y=1980|2pp=101–105}} The literature's early period ({{circa|330–650}}) was dominated by the competing cultures of ], ] and ].{{sfnm|1a1=Browning|1y=2022|1loc=§ paras. 1–2|2a1=Kaldellis|2y=2021|2pp=162–163}} The ]—educated in an Ancient Greek ] tradition—sought to synthesize these influences.{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Important early writers include ], ] and ], all of whom aimed to reinvent older forms to fit the empire.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} Theological ] stories were particularly innovative and popular;{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} the '']'' (''Apophthegmata Patrum'') were copied in practically every Byzantine monastery.{{sfn|Martín|2021|p=685}} During the ] ({{circa|650–800}}), production of literature mostly stopped, although some important theologians were active, such as ], ] and ].{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}}
Of the approximately two to three thousand volumes of Byzantine literature that survive, only three hundred and thirty consist of secular poetry, history, science and pseudo-science.<ref name="Mango275–276"/> While the most flourishing period of the secular literature of Byzantium runs from the 9th to the 12th century, its religious literature (]s, ]s and poetry, theology, devotional treatises, etc.) developed much earlier with ] being its most prominent representative.<ref name="CLi">{{cite encyclopedia|title=Byzantine Literature|encyclopedia=Catholic Encyclopedia|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03113a.htm}}</ref>


The subsequent cultural Macedonian Renaissance ({{circa|800–1000}}; the "Encyclopedism period") saw a renewed proliferation of literature and revived the earlier Hellenic-Christian synthesis.{{sfn|Browning|2022|loc=§ para. 1}} Works by ], ] and ] were translated, while ] was heavily reorganized.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} After this early flowering of monastic literature, there was a dearth until ] in the late 10th-century.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} A new generation ({{circa|1000–1250}}), including Symeon, ] and ], rejected the Encyclopedist emphasis on order, and were interested in individual-focused ideals variously concerning ], ], heroism, humor and love.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|pp=1236–1237}} This included the Hellenistic-inspired ] and ] approaches in rhetoric, historiography and the influential epic '']''.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1236}} The empire's final centuries saw a renewal of hagiography and increased Western influence, leading to mass Greek to Latin translations.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1237}} Authors such as ] and ] exemplified a new focus on human ]s alongside the preservation of classical traditions, which greatly influenced the ].{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991b|p=1237}}
== Music ==
{{Main|Byzantine music}}
], from a Byzantine ivory casket (900 – 1100 AD). (''Museo Nazionale, Florence'')]]
], 1st century BC, ], Greece]]


===Music===
The ecclesiastical forms of Byzantine music, composed to Greek texts as ceremonial, festival, or church music,<ref>The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. 2007 - "Byzantine music"</ref> are, today, the most well-known forms. Ecclesiastical chants were a fundamental part of this genre. Greek and foreign historians agree that the ecclesiastical tones and in general the whole system of Byzantine music is closely related to the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ec-patr.net/en/psaltai/index.htm|title=Ecumenical Patriarchate - Byzantine Music|work=ec-patr.net}}</ref> It remains the oldest genre of extant music, of which the manner of performance and (with increasing accuracy from the 5th century onwards) the names of the composers, and sometimes the particulars of each musical work's circumstances, are known.
{{main|Byzantine music}}
{{CSS image crop
|Image = Mosaic of the Female Musicians.jpg
|bSize = 350
|cWidth = 260
|cHeight = 190
|oTop = 25
|oLeft = 45
|Location = right
|alt = A cropped image of a mosaic, which depicts two women playing a church organ like instrument
|Description = Late 4th century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the ], ], and ] from a Byzantine villa in ], Syria.{{sfn|Ring|1994|p=318}}
}}


] is eclectically descended from early ], ], and a variety of ], although its exact connections to ] remain uncertain.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1pp=28–29|2a1=Conomos|2y=1991|2pp=1426}} While it included both ] and ] traditions, the latter is little known, whereas the former remains the central music of ] liturgy into the 21st century.{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1y=1991|1pp=1424–1426|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§ Introduction}} The empire's church music, known as Byzantine ], was exclusively unaccompanied ] vocal music, sung in Greek.{{sfn|Velimirović|1990|pp=26–27, 29}} From the 8th century onwards, chant melodies were governed by the '']'' framework, a set of eight ]—] ({{lang|grc|ἦχος}}; {{lit.|sound}})—each of which provide predetermined ] formulae for composition.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1pp=45–46|2a1=Conomos|2y=1991|2p=1425|3a1=Levy|3a2=Troelsgård|3y=2016|3loc=§5 "System of eight modes ('oktōēchos')", §7 "Formulaic chants"}} These formulae were chosen for proper ] and occasionally for ], then ]ally collated into a variety of ]s or ]s.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|1p=29|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§7 "Formulaic chants"}}
The 9th century ] geographer ] (d. 911); in his lexicographical discussion of instruments cited the lyra (lūrā) as the typical instrument of the Byzantines along with the ''urghun'' (organ), ''shilyani'' (probably a type of ] or ]) and the ''salandj'' (probably a ]).<ref name=Kartomi124>{{citation |last=Kartomi |first=Margaret J. |title=On Concepts and Classifications of Musical Instruments |publisher=] |year=1990 |isbn=0-226-42548-7 |page=124}}</ref> The first of these, the early bowed stringed instrument known as the ], would come to be called the '']'',<ref>{{citation |last=Encyclopædia Britannica |title= lira |url= http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/343204/lira |publisher=] |year=2009}}</ref> in Venice, where it is considered by many to have been the predecessor of the contemporary violin, which later flourished there.<ref name=Arkenberg109>{{citation |last=Arkenberg|first=Rebecca |title=Renaissance Violins |date=October 2002| publisher=] |url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/renv/hd_renv.htm |accessdate=2006-09-22}}</ref> The bowed "lyra" is still played in former Byzantine regions, where it is known as the ] (lit. "lyra of the City" i.e. ]) in Greece, the ] in Southern Italy, and the ] in ]. The second instrument, the organ, originated in the ] world (see ]) and was used in the ] during races.<ref>Journal of Sport History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Winter, 1981) .</ref><ref name=Bush-Kassel-327>Douglas Earl Bush, Richard Kassel editors, ''The Organ: An Encyclopedia'' Routledge. 2006. </ref> A ] with "great leaden pipes" was sent by the emperor ] to ] King of the ] in 757. Pepin's son ] requested a similar organ for his chapel in ] in 812, beginning its establishment in Western church music.<ref name=Bush-Kassel-327/> The final Byzantine instrument, the bagpipes, known as '']'' (from ]: angion (Τὸ ἀγγεῖον) "the container"), had been played even in Roman times. ] wrote in the 1st century of a contemporary sovereign (possibly Nero) who could play a pipe (], Roman reedpipes similar to Greek ]) with his mouth as well as by tucking a bladder beneath his armpit.<ref>{{Citation | title = Discourses by Dio Chrysostom (Or.&nbsp;71.9) | url = http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Dio_Chrysostom/Discourses/71*.html#9 | publisher = ] | work = The Seventy-first Discourse: On the Philosopher (Volume V) | volume = V | page = 173 | date = | accessdate = 2013-01-02}}</ref> The bagpipes continued to be played throughout the empire's former realms through to the present. (See Balkan ], Greek ], ] ], Cretan ], Armenian ], and Romanian ].)


Byzantine chant was central to the ]; however, the earliest music was not ],{{sfn|Velimirović|1990|pp=26–27}} including early mono] short hymns like the ].{{sfn|Levy|Troelsgård|2016|loc=§10 "Syllabic hymn settings"}} While proto-] (9th century onwards) marked simple ] patterns, the ] Palaeo-Byzantine notation system emerged in the 10th century, while the Middle Byzantine "Round Notation" from mid-12th century onwards is the first fully ] scheme.{{sfnm|1a1=Velimirović|1y=1990|pp=48–51|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§3 "Melodic notation"}} Several major forms developed alongside ]: the long ] (5th century onwards), popularised by ]; the also-extensive ] (late 7th century onwards), developed by ]; and the shorter ] (at least 8th century onwards), championed by ].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1y=1991|1p=1425|2a1=Levy|2a2=Troelsgård|2y=2016|2loc=§3 "Melodic notation"|3a1=Mellas|3y=2020|3p=2}} By the Palaiologan period, the dominance of strict compositional rules lessened and ] led a new school which favoured a more ] "kalophonic" style that deeply informed post-empire Neo-Byzantine music.{{sfn|Conomos|1991|pp=1425–1426}}
== Cuisine and recreation ==
{{See also|Byzantine cuisine}}
] played by ] Emperor ] in 480 and recorded by ] in c. 530 because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red), as he threw 2, 5 and 6 and was forced to leave eight pieces alone. See "Zeno's Game of τάβλη".<ref name="austin-zeno">Austin, Roland G. "Zeno's Game of τάβλη", ''The Journal of Hellenic Studies'' 54:2, 1934. pp&nbsp;202–205.</ref>]]


Secular music, often state-sponsored, was ubiquitous in daily life and featured in a variety of ceremonies, festivals, and theatre.{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§ Introduction}} Secular vocal music was rarely notated, and extant manuscripts date much later, suggesting the tradition was passed through ] and likely ].{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§ "Sources"}} Prohibited for liturgical use, a wide variety of Byzantine ]s flourished in secular contexts, although notated instrumental music does not survive.{{sfn|Conomos|Kazhdan|1991|p=1426}} It is uncertain to what extent instrumentalists improvised or if they doubled vocalists monophonically or ].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1a2=Kazhdan|1y=1991|1p=1426|2a1=Touliatos|2y=2001|2loc=§2 "Instruments and performing practice"}} Among the best known instruments are the ], used for both circus and imperial court events; the ]-descended ], a ]; the ], a plucked ]; and mostly popularly, the ].{{sfnm|1a1=Conomos|1a2=Kazhdan|1y=1991|1p=1426|2a1=Touliatos|2y=2001|2loc=§2 "Instruments and performing practice"}} Prominent genres included ] chants of laudation or salutation; the celebratory ]; symposia instrumental ]s, based on ancient ]s; and ].{{sfn|Touliatos|2001|loc=§3 "Genres and composers"}}
The Byzantine culture of recreation and cuisine was, initially, the same as late Roman, but over the following millennium of the empire's existence slowly changed into something more similar to modern Balkan and Anatolian culture.


== Science and medicine ==
The cuisine still relied heavily on the Roman condiment ], but it also contained foods still familiar today, such as the cured meat ] (known as "paston" in Byzantine Greek),<ref>{{cite book|last=Ash|first=John|title=A Byzantine journey|year=2006|publisher=Tauris Parke Paperbacks|location=London|isbn=978-1-84511-307-0|edition=2nd|quote=Having inherited pastirma from the Byzantines, the Turks took it with them when they conquered Hungary and Romania,}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Davidson|first=Alan|title=The Oxford Companion to Food|year=2014|publisher=Oxford University Press|accessdate=21 October 2014|page=123|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA123|quote=This is certainly true of Byzantine cuisine. Dried meat, a forerunner of the ''pastirma'' of modern Turkey, became a delicacy.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Anagnostakis|first=Ilias|title=Flavours and Delights. Tastes and Pleasures of Ancient and Byzantine Cuisine|year=2013|publisher=Armos |quote=''paston'' or ''tarichon''...Cured meats were either eaten raw or cooked in ''pasto-mageireia'' with bulgur and greens, mainly cabbage.|page=81}}</ref> ] (known as ] κοπτοπλακοῦς),<ref>John Ash, ''A Byzantine Journey'', </ref><ref name=faas></ref><ref name="Speros Vryonis 1971, p. 482">Speros Vryonis ''The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor'', 1971, p. 482</ref> ] (known as plakountas tetyromenous or tyritas plakountas),<ref name="Speros Vryonis 1971, p. 482"/><ref name = faas2>{{cite book |last=Faas |first=Patrick |authorlink= |title=Around the Roman Table |year=2005 |publisher=] |quote= | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC&pg=PA186&dq=Placenta+as+food+Italy+bay+leaves&ei=osZPStvpK4PcygS6nvXRAg |isbn=0-226-23347-2 | pages = 184–185 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jYa3J6xrjt4C&pg=PA184|title=Food in Motion the Migration of Foodstuffs and Cookery Techniques from the Oxford Symposium on Food Cookery|work=google.com|author=Rena Salaman|volume=2|page=184}}</ref> and the famed medieval sweet wines (] and the eponymous ]). ], wine flavored with pine resin, was also drunk, as it still is in Greece today, producing similar reactions from unfamiliar visitors; "To add to our calamity the Greek wine, on account of being mixed with pitch, resin, and plaster was to us undrinkable," complained ], who was the ambassador sent to Constantinople in 968 by the German Holy Roman Emperor ].<ref name="fordham.edu">{{cite web|url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/liudprand1.asp|title=Internet History Sourcebooks Project|work=fordham.edu}}</ref> The ] fish sauce condiment was also not much appreciated by the unaccustomed; Liutprand of Cremona described being served food covered in an "exceedingly bad fish liquor."<ref name="fordham.edu"/> The Byzantines also used a soy sauce like condiment, ], a fermented barley sauce, which, like soy sauce, provided ] flavoring to their dishes.<ref name=Jayyusip729>Jayyusi, Salma Khadra; Marín, Manuela (1992), The Legacy of Muslim Spain (2nd, illustrated ed.), BRILL, ISBN 978-90-04-09599-1, p. 729.</ref><ref>{{Citation|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/31/food/fo-63688|title=The Soy Sauce That Wasn't|last=Perry|first=Charles|date=October 31, 2001 |work=Los Angeles Times|accessdate=2009-03-21}}</ref>


===Science===
Byzantines were avid players of ] (]: τάβλη), a game known in English as ], which is still popular in former Byzantine realms, and still known by the name tavli in Greece.<ref name="austin-zeno"/> Byzantine nobles were devoted to horsemanship, particularly ], now known as ]. The game came from Sassanid Persia in the early period and a Tzykanisterion (stadium for playing the game) was built by ] (r. 408–450) inside the ]. Emperor ] (r. 867–886) excelled at it; Emperor ] (r. 912–913) died from exhaustion while playing, Emperor ] (r. 1081–1118) was injured while playing with ], and ] (r. 1235–1238) died from a fatal injury during a game.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Kazhdan|editor-first=Alexander Petrovich|editor-link=Alexander Kazhdan|title=The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium|location=New York, New York and Oxford, United Kingdom|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1991|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q3u5RAAACAAJ|isbn=978-0-19-504652-6|ref=harv}}</ref><ref>],''The Alexiad'', ], translator Elizabeth Dawes</ref> Aside from ] and ], other Byzantine cities also featured ''tzykanisteria'', most notably ], ], and ], an indication of a thriving urban aristocracy.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Laiou|editor-first=Angeliki E.|editor-link=Angeliki Laiou|title=The Economic History of Byzantium from the Seventh through the Fifteenth Century|year=2002|location=Washington, District of Columbia|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|isbn=0-88402-288-9|url=http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/EconHist/EHB29.pdf|ref=harv, p. 643}}.</ref> The game was introduced to the West by crusaders, who developed a taste for it particularly during the pro-Western reign of emperor ].
{{Main|Byzantine science}}
{{See also|List of Byzantine inventions|Byzantine philosophy|List of Byzantine scholars}}


], the patriarchal ] in Constantinople designed 537 by ], who was influenced by ]' principles of solid geometry is evident.|alt=A photograph of the interior of a building built with blue arches and pillars and ornate yellow walls]]
== Government and bureaucracy ==
] played an important and crucial role in the ] to the ] and ].{{sfnm|Saliba|2006|Robins|1993|2p=8|Lazaris|2020|3p=17}} Many distinguished scholars held high offices in the ].{{Sfn|Lazaris|2020|p=194}}{{sfn|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=189}}
{{See also|Byzantine bureaucracy}}


The manuscripts of ] were studied and preserved in Byzantium.{{Sfn|Lazaris|2020|p=3}} Therefore, Byzantine science was, in every era, closely connected to ] and ].{{Sfn|Anastos|1962|p=409}} In the field of engineering, ], the Greek mathematician and architect of the Hagia Sophia, produced the first compilation of ]' works {{Circa|530}}. It is through this manuscript tradition, sustained by the school of mathematics and engineering established {{Circa|850}} during the "Byzantine Renaissance" by ],{{Sfn|Lazaris|2020|p=66}} that such works are known today, primarily through the school's production, the ].{{sfn|Jones|2005}}
In the Byzantine state, the ] was the sole and ], and his power was regarded as having divine origin.<ref>{{harvnb|Mango|2007|pp=259–260}}.</ref> The ] had ceased to have real political and legislative authority but remained as an honorary council with titular members. By the end of the 8th century, a civil administration focused on the court was formed as part of a large-scale consolidation of power in the capital (the rise to pre-eminence of the position of '']'' is related to this change).<ref name="L291">{{harvnb|Louth|2005|p=291}}; {{harvnb|Neville|2004|p=7}}.</ref> The most important administrative reform, which probably started in the mid-7th century, was the creation of ], where civil and military administration was exercised by one person, the '']''.<ref name="M60">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=138–142}}; {{harvnb|Mango|2007|p=60}}.</ref>


Alexandrian philosopher ] was the first to question ]. Unlike Aristotle, who based his physics on verbal arguments, Philoponus relied on observations. Philoponus' criticism of the Aristotelian principles of physics was an inspiration for ]'s refutation of Aristotelian physics during the ] many centuries later, as Galileo cites Philoponus substantially in his works.{{sfnm|Lindberg|1992|1p=162|Wildberg|2018}}
{{multiple image
| footer =
| align = right
| image1 = Byzantine Empire Themata-750-en.svg
| width1 = 210
| alt1 = Map of Byzantine Empire showing the themes in circa 750
| caption1 = The ''themes'', c. 750
| image2 = Byzantine Empire Themata-950-en.svg
| width2 = 210
| alt2 = Map of Byzantine Empire showing the themes in circa 950
| caption2 = The ''themes'', c. 950
}}


], surrounded by ]s, 10th–12th century, ], Athens, Greece|alt=Two pots surrounded by caltrops]] ], an incendiary weapon which could even burn on water, is attributed to the Byzantines. It played a crucial role in the empire's victory over the Umayyad Caliphate during the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Greek Fire &#124; Weaponry |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/Greek-fire |website=Encyclopedia Britannica |access-date=1 March 2018 |archive-date=10 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180310022524/https://www.britannica.com/technology/Greek-fire |url-status=live}}</ref> The discovery is attributed to ], who had fled to the city after the Arab conquest of Syria.{{Sf|Lazaris|2020|p=446}} However, it has also been argued that no single person invented Greek fire, and that it was instead "invented by the chemists in Constantinople who had inherited the discoveries of the Alexandrian chemical school...".{{sfn|Partington|1999|page=13}}
Despite the occasionally derogatory use of the terms "Byzantine" and "]", the ] had a distinct ability for reconstituting itself in accordance with the Empire's situation. The elaborate system of titulature and precedence gave the court prestige and influence. Officials were arranged in strict order around the emperor, and depended upon the imperial will for their ranks. There were also actual administrative jobs, but authority could be vested in individuals rather than offices.<ref name="L34">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=157–158}}; {{harvnb|Neville|2004|p=34}}.</ref>


During the last century of the empire, ] and other ] were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.{{Sfn|Tatakes|Moutafakis|2003|p=189}} The Fall of Constantinople in 1453 fuelled the era later commonly known as the "]". During this period, ] were principally responsible for transmitting ancient Greek grammatical, literary, mathematical, and astronomical works to early Renaissance Italy, whether personally or through their written works.{{Sfn|Robins|1993|p=8}} They also brought classical knowledge and texts on botany, medicine and zoology, as well as the works of ] and John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian physics.{{sfn|Lindberg|1992|p=162}}
In the 8th and 9th centuries, civil service constituted the clearest path to aristocratic status, but, starting in the 9th century, the civil aristocracy was rivalled by an aristocracy of nobility. According to some studies of Byzantine government, 11th-century politics were dominated by competition between the civil and the military aristocracy. During this period, Alexios I undertook important administrative reforms, including the creation of new courtly dignities and offices.<ref name="L13">{{harvnb|Neville|2004|p=13}}.</ref>


=== Diplomacy === ===Medicine===
{{details|Byzantine diplomacy}} {{Main|Byzantine medicine}}
] in 829, between the emperor ] and the Abbasid caliph ] ]]
After the fall of Rome, the key challenge to the Empire was to maintain a set of relations between itself and its neighbours. When these nations set about forging formal political institutions, they often modelled themselves on Constantinople. Byzantine diplomacy soon managed to draw its neighbours into a network of international and inter-state relations.<ref name="N1">{{harvnb|Neumann|2006|pp=869–871}}.</ref> This network revolved around treaty making, and included the welcoming of the new ruler into the family of kings, and the assimilation of Byzantine social attitudes, values and institutions.<ref>{{harvnb|Chrysos|1992|p=35}}.</ref> Whereas classical writers are fond of making ethical and legal distinctions between peace and war, Byzantines regarded diplomacy as a form of war by other means. For example, a Bulgarian threat could be countered by providing money to the ].<ref name="Ant">{{harvnb|Antonucci|1993|pp=11–13}}.</ref>


The Byzantines pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and the possibility of a cure for the patients as a reflection of the ideals of Christian charity, rather than merely being a place to die.{{sfnm|Lindberg|1992|1p=349|Nutton|1984|2p=9|Miller|1997|3pp=ix, 3–4}} The historian David Bennett estimates that there were approximately 115 hospitals in Constantinople during the mid-ninth century.{{sfn|Bennett|2016|p=24}}
Diplomacy in the era was understood to have an intelligence-gathering function on top of its pure political function. The ] in Constantinople handled matters of protocol and record keeping for any issues related to the "]", and thus had, perhaps, a basic intelligence function itself.<ref>{{harvnb|Antonucci|1993|pp=11–13}}; {{harvnb|Seeck|1876|pp=31–33}}</ref> John B. Bury believed that the office exercised supervision over all foreigners visiting Constantinople, and that they were under the supervision of the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bury|Philotheus|1911|p=93}}.</ref> While on the surface a protocol office – its main duty was to ensure foreign envoys were properly cared for and received sufficient state funds for their maintenance, and it kept all the official translators – it probably had a security function as well.<ref>{{harvnb|Dennis|1985|p=125}}.</ref>


== Legacy ==
Byzantines availed themselves of a number of diplomatic practices. For example, embassies to the capital would often stay on for years. A member of other royal houses would routinely be requested to stay on in Constantinople, not only as a potential hostage, but also as a useful pawn in case political conditions where he came from changed. Another key practice was to overwhelm visitors by sumptuous displays.<ref name="N1"/> According to ], the preservation of the ancient civilisation in Europe was due to the skill and resourcefulness of Byzantine diplomacy, which remains one of Byzantium's lasting contributions to the history of Europe.<ref name="O3">{{harvnb|Obolensky|1994|p=3}}.</ref>
{{Main|Legacy of the Roman Empire}}


=== Flags and insignia === === Political aftermath ===
{{Main|Succession to the Byzantine Empire}}
{{main|Byzantine flags and insignia}}


]|alt=A map centered on Greece and Turkey in 1450 AD. The Byzantine Empire holds only Southern Greece and northwestern Turkey]]
For most of its history, the Byzantine Empire did not know or use ] in the West European sense. Various emblems ({{lang-el|σημεία}}, ''sēmeia''; sing. σημείον, ''sēmeion'') were used in official occasions and for military purposes, such as banners or shields displaying various motifs such as the ] or the '']''. The use of the cross, and of images of ], the ] and various saints is also ] of officials, but these were personal rather than family emblems.{{sfn|Kazhdan|1991|pp=472, 999}}
By the time of the fall of Constantinople, the Byzantine Empire, already an empire in name only since the Fourth Crusade, had been reduced to three ]s: the ], the Empire of Trebizond and the ]. The Morea was ruled by the brothers of Constantine XI, ] and ]. The despotate continued as an independent state by paying an annual tribute to the Ottomans. Incompetent rule, failure to pay the annual tribute, and a revolt against the Ottomans finally led to ] in May 1460.{{sfnm|Nicol|1993|1pp=396, 401|Reinert|2002|2p=283}}


A few holdouts remained for some time. In the ], the island of ] came under the protection of ] before the end of 1460.{{sfn|Kalligas|2002|pp=886, 888}} The Empire of Trebizond, which had split away from the Byzantine Empire just weeks before Constantinople was taken by the Crusaders in 1204, became the last remnant of and de facto successor state to the Byzantine Empire. Efforts by Emperor ] to recruit European powers for an anti-Ottoman crusade provoked war between the Ottomans and Trebizond in the summer of 1461. After a ], David surrendered the city of Trebizond on 14 August 1461. Trebizond's Crimean principality, the Principality of Theodoro (part of the ]), lasted another 14 years, falling to the Ottomans in December 1475.{{sfn|Nicol|1993|pages=407–408}}
* ]
* ]


Mehmed II and his successors continued to ] to the Roman Empire. They considered that they had shifted their religious basis as Constantine had done before, and they continued to refer to their conquered Eastern Roman inhabitants (]) as ]. This claim gradually faded away as the Ottoman Empire assumed a more Islamic political identity.{{sfn|Üre|2020|p=46}} Meanwhile, the ], whose rulers also considered themselves the heirs of the Eastern Roman Emperors,{{Sfn|Clark|2000|p=213}} harboured Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles.
== Language ==
{{details|Medieval Greek}}
{{double image|right|Mudil_Psalter.jpg|120|Joshua_Roll.jpg|150|Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete ] in the Coptic language (], Egypt, ]).<br/>
Right: The ], a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript probably made in Constantinople (], Rome).
}}
] in the late Byzantine Empire through to 1923. ] in yellow. ] in orange. ] in green. (Green dots indicate Cappadocian Greek speaking villages in 1910.<ref>] 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A study of dialect of Silly, Cappadocia and Pharasa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</ref>)]]


After Constantine's death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by ], Grand Prince of ]. He had married Andreas' sister, ], whose grandson, ], became the first tsar of Russia (''tsar'', or ''czar'', meaning ''caesar'', is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine emperors). Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the ] as the successive ] was very much alive in Imperial Russia, but it lost state support after the ].{{Sfn|Seton-Watson|1967|p=31}}
Apart from the Imperial court, administration and military, the primary language used in the eastern Roman provinces even before the ] was Greek, having been spoken in the region for centuries before Latin.<ref>{{harvnb|Millar|2006|p=279}}.</ref> Following Rome's conquest of the east its 'Pax Romana', inclusionist political practices and development of public infrastructure, facilitated the further spreading and entrenchment of Greek language in the east. Indeed, early on in the life of the Roman Empire, Greek had become the common language of the Church, the language of scholarship and the arts, and, to a large degree, the '']'' for trade between provinces and with other nations.<ref>{{harvnb|Bryce|1901|p=59}}; {{harvnb|McDonnell|2006|p=77}}; {{harvnb|Millar|2006|pp=97–98}}; {{harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|pp=12–13}}.</ref> Greek for a time became ] with the spoken language, known as ] (eventually evolving into ]), used alongside an older ] until Koine won out as the spoken and written standard.<ref>{{harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|pp=12–13}}.</ref>


=== Cultural aftermath ===
The use of Latin as the language of administration persisted until formally abolished by Heraclius in the 7th century. Scholarly Latin would rapidly fall into disuse among the educated classes although the language would continue to be at least a ceremonial part of the Empire's culture for some time.<ref name="ApWr">{{harvnb|Apostolides|1992|pp=25–26}}; {{harvnb|Wroth|1908|loc=Introduction, Section 6}}</ref> Additionally, ] remained a minority language in the Empire, mainly along the Dalmatian coast (]) and among the Romanian peoples.<ref>{{harvnb|Sedlar|1994|pp=403–440}}.</ref>
{{See also|Succession of the Roman Empire|Greek scholars in the Renaissance}}
], Byzantine missionaries to the Slavs, on ] in the ]|alt=A photograph of statue, which depicts two bearded and hooded men, the one on the left is holding up a cross while the one on the right is holding up a book]]
]|alt=A painting which shows a Christian priest standing on a pier officiating the baptism of multiple people who are standing in a water body while other people watch on]]


The historian ] notes how Byzantium has often been identified with absolutism, orthodox spirituality, orientalism and exoticism, while the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism" have been used as bywords for decadence, complex bureaucracy, and repression. Both Eastern and Western European authors have often perceived Byzantium as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas contrary to those of the West. Even in ], the focus was mainly on the classical past, while Byzantine tradition was associated with negative connotations.{{Sfn|Cameron|2009|pp=277–281}}
Many other languages existed in the multi-ethnic Empire, and some of these were given limited official status in their provinces at various times. Notably, by the beginning of the Middle Ages, ] had become more widely used by the educated classes in the far eastern provinces.<ref name="BJVe">{{harvnb|Beaton|1996|p=10}}; {{harvnb|Jones|1986|p=991}}; {{harvnb|Versteegh|1977|loc=Chapter 1}}.</ref> Similarly ], ], and ] became significant among the educated in their provinces,<ref>{{harvnb|Campbell|2000|p=40}}; {{harvnb|Hacikyan|Basmajian|Franchuk|Ouzounian|2002|loc=Part 1}}</ref> and later foreign contacts made ], ], and ] important in the Empire and its sphere of influence.<ref>{{harvnb|Baynes|1907|p=289}}; {{harvnb|Gutas|1998|loc=Chapter 7, Section 4}}; {{harvnb|Comrie|1987|p=129}}.</ref>


This traditional approach towards Byzantium has been partially or wholly disputed and revised by modern studies, which focus on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy. From the ninth to the twelfth centuries, Byzantine Christianity converted and helped establish multiple nations in what is now Eastern Europe.{{sfn|Shepard|2006|pp=4–5, 7–8}}{{sfn|Harris|2014|p=7}} Cameron regards this as undeniable, and she and Obolensky both recognize the major role of Byzantium in shaping Orthodoxy, which in turn occupies a central position in the history, societies and culture of Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, Serbia and other countries.{{Sfn|Cameron|2009|pp=186–277}}
Aside from these, since Constantinople was a prime trading center in the ] and beyond, virtually every known language of the Middle Ages was spoken in the Empire at some time, even ].<ref>{{harvnb|Beckwith|1993|p=171}}; {{harvnb|Halsall|1998}}; {{harvnb|Oikonomides|1999|p=20}}.</ref> As the Empire entered its final decline, the Empire's citizens became more culturally homogeneous and the Greek language became integral to their identity and religion.<ref>{{harvnb|Kaldellis|2007|loc=Chapter 6}}; {{harvnb|Nicol|1993|loc=Chapter 5}}.</ref>
Its use of vernacular language, and the development of the first Slavic written script, increased education and literacy and influenced the direction of the spiritual, religious, and cultural development of the entire region.{{sfn|Poppe|1991|p=25}}{{sfn|Ivanič|2016|p=127}} The Byzantines also preserved and copied classical manuscripts, and they are thus regarded as transmitters of classical knowledge, as important contributors to modern European civilization, and as precursors of both ] and Slavic-Orthodox culture.{{Sfn|Cameron|2009|p=261}} The Byzantine law codes form the basis of civil law traditions in much of Europe, Latin America, Ethiopia, other countries that follow ], and possibly even Islamic countries.{{sfnm|Stolte|2015|2a1=Merryman|2a2=Pérez-Perdomo|2y=2007|Stein|1999|1pp=10–11|2pp=367–368|3p=36}}{{sfn|Salogubova|Zenkov|2018}}


As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it shielded Western Europe from the Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for some time, the Ottomans. From another perspective, since the 7th century, the evolution and constant reshaping of the Byzantine state was directly corelated to the progress of Islamic conquests.{{Sfn|Cameron|2009|p=261}} Following the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, Sultan Mehmed II took the title "''Kaysar-i Rûm''" (the Ottoman Turkish equivalent of ] of Rome), since he was determined to make the Ottoman Empire the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.{{Sfnm|Béhar|1999|1a1=Bideleux|1a2=Jeffries|1y=1998|1p=71|2p=38}}
== Legacy ==
{{see also|Third Rome|Greek scholars in the Renaissance}}
] in robes of a Byzantine emperor; miniature from the ] ]]

Byzantium has been often identified with absolutism, orthodox spirituality, orientalism and exoticism, while the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism" have been used as bywords for decadence, complex bureaucracy, and repression. In the countries of ] and Southeast Europe that exited the ] in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the assessment of Byzantine civilisation and its legacy was strongly negative due to their connection with an alleged "Eastern authoritarianism and autocracy." Both Eastern and Western European authors have often perceived Byzantium as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas contrary to those of the West. Even in ], the focus was mainly on the classical past, while Byzantine tradition had been associated with negative connotations.<ref name="A1">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=277–281}}.</ref>

This traditional approach towards Byzantium has been partially or wholly disputed and revised by modern studies, which focus on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy. ] regards as undeniable the Byzantine contribution to the formation of the medieval Europe, and both Cameron and Obolensky recognise the major role of Byzantium in shaping Orthodoxy, which in turn occupies a central position in the history and societies of Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, Serbia and other countries.<ref>{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|pp=186–277}}.</ref> The Byzantines also preserved and copied classical manuscripts, and they are thus regarded as transmitters of the classical knowledge, as important contributors to the modern European civilization, and as precursors of both the ] and the Slav Orthodox culture.<ref name="C311"/>

As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it distanced Western Europe from Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for a time, the Ottomans. From a different perspective, since the 7th century, the evolution and constant reshaping of the Byzantine state were directly related to the respective progress of Islam.<ref name="C311">{{harvnb|Cameron|2009|p=261}}.</ref>

Following the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, Sultan ] took the title "''Kaysar-i Rûm''" (the ] equivalent of ] of Rome), since he was determined to make the Ottoman Empire the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Béhar|1999|p=38}}; {{harvnb|Bideleux|Jeffries|1998|p=71}}.</ref> According to Cameron, regarding themselves as "heirs" of Byzantium, the Ottomans preserved important aspects of its tradition, which in turn facilitated an "Orthodox revival" during the ] period of the Eastern European states.<ref name="C311"/>


== See also == == See also ==
* ]

* ]
{{Portal|Byzantine Empire}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


{{clear}}
== Annotations ==
{{Reflist|group="n"}}

== Notes ==
{{Reflist|30em}}


== References == == References ==


=== Primary sources === === Notes ===
{{Refbegin|30em}} {{Notelist}}

* {{cite book|last=Choniates|first=Nicetas|authorlink=Nicetas Choniates|title=Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History by D.C. Munro (Series 1, Vol 3:1)|location=Philadelphia|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|pages=15–16|year=1912|chapter=The Sack of Constantinople (1204)|ref=harv}}
=== Citations ===
* {{cite book|last=Cinnamus|first=Ioannes|authorlink=John Kinnamos|title=Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus|location=New York and West Sussex|publisher=Columbia University Press|year=1976|isbn=0-231-04080-6|ref=harv}}
{{Reflist}}
* {{cite book|author=Eusebius|authorlink=Eusebius of Caesaria|title=Life of Constantine (Book IV)|publisher=]|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iv.vi.i.i.html}}
* {{cite book|author=Geoffrey of Villehardouin|authorlink=Geoffrey of Villehardouin|title= Chronicles of the Crusades (translated by Margaret R. Shaw)|publisher=Penguin Classics|year=1963|isbn=0-14-044124-7|chapter=The Conquest of Constantinople|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Komnene|first=Anna|authorlink=Anna Komnene|title=The Alexiad (translated by Elizabeth A. S. Dawes)|publisher=Internet Medieval Sourcebook|chapter=Books X-XIII |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/annacomnena-alexiad00.html#INTRODUCTION|year=1928|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|editor-last=Seeck|editor-first=Otto|title=Notitia Dignitatum; accedunt Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae Laterculi Prouinciarum|location=Berlin|publisher=Weidmann|year=1876|url=https://archive.org/details/notitiadignitat00silvgoog|ref=harv}}
{{Refend}}


=== Secondary sources === === Sources ===
{{Refbegin|2}} {{Refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* {{cite journal |last=Adams |first=Robert Merrihew |author-link=Robert Merrihew Adams |title=Nestorius and Nestorianism |year=2021 |journal=The Monist |volume=104 |issue=3 |pages=366–375 |doi=10.1093/monist/onab005}}
* {{cite book|first=Agustí|last=Alemany|title=Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation|location=Leiden|publisher=Brill|year=2000|pages=170–243|isbn=90-04-11442-4|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Anastos |first=Milton V. |date=1962 |title=The History of Byzantine Science. Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1961 |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=16 |pages=409–411 |doi=10.2307/1291170 |issn=0070-7546 |jstor=1291170}}
* {{cite book|last=Ahrweiler|first=Hélène|last2=Laiou|first2=Angeliki E.|author1-link=Helene Ahrweiler|author2-link=Angeliki Laiou|title=Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire|chapter=Preface|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|year=1998|isbn=0-88402-247-1|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ando |first=Clifford |title=Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition |date=2011 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-0-8122-4354-3 |series=Empire and After |author-link=Clifford Ando |location=Philadelphia |doi=10.9783/9780812204889}}
* {{cite journal|last=Anastos|first=Milton V.|year=1962|title=The History of Byzantine Science. Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1961|journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers|issn=0070-7546|volume=16|pages=409–411| doi=10.2307/1291170|jstor=1291170|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Angold|first=Michael|title=The Byzantine Empire, 1025–1204: A Political History|location=London|publisher=Longman|year=1997|isbn=978-0-582-29468-4|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Andronikou |first=Anthi |year=2022 |title=Italy, Cyprus, and Artistic Exchange in the Medieval Mediterranean |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-316-51092-6 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=vkeEEAAAQBAJ}} |doi=10.1017/9781009039055}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Angold |editor-first=Michael |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2006 |volume=5 |isbn=9781139054089 |editor-link=Michael Angold |location=Cambridge and New York}}
* {{cite journal|last=Antonucci|first=Michael|year=1993|title=War by Other Means: The Legacy of Byzantium|journal=History Today|volume=43|issue=2|pages=11–13|issn=0018-2753|url=http://www.historytoday.com/michael-antonucci/war-other-means-legacy-byzantium|accessdate=21 May 2007|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Kitromilides |first=Paschalis |c=Orthodoxy and the West: Reformation to Enlightenment |in=Angold |year=2006 |pp=187–209 |author-link=Paschalis Kitromilides}}
* {{cite book|first=Sophocles Evangelinus|last=Apostolides|title=Greek Lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine Periods|location=Hildesheim|publisher=Georg Olms|year=1992|isbn=3-487-05765-4|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Micheau |first=Françoise |c=Eastern Christianities (Eleventh to Fourteenth Century): Copts, Melkites, Nestorians and Jacobites |year=2006 |in=Angold |pp=371–403}}
* {{cite journal|last=Bayless|first=William N.|year=1976|title=The Treaty with the Huns of 443|journal=The American Journal of Philology|volume=97|pages=176–179|jstor=294410|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Shepard |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Shepard |c=The Byzantine Commonwealth 1000–1550 |in=Angold |year=2006 |pp=1–52}}
* {{cite journal|last=Baynes|first=Norman Hepburn|year=1912|title=The Restoration of the Cross at Jerusalem|doi=10.1093/ehr/XXVII.CVI.287|journal=The English Historical Review|volume=27|issue=106|issn=0013-8266|pages=287–299|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Apostolides |first=Evangelinos Sophocles|author-link=Evangelinos Apostolides Sophocles |title=Greek Lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine Periods |publisher=Georg Olms |date=1887 |isbn=978-3-487-05765-1 |location=Hildesheim}}
* {{cite book|editor1-last=Baynes|editor1-first=Norman Hepburn|editor2-last=Moss|editor2-first=Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort|title=Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization|location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1948|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-88402-484-2 |last2=Ransohoff |first2=Jake |last1=Aschenbrenner |first1=Nathanael |location=Washington, DC}}
* {{cite book|last=Baynes|first=Spencer|chapter=Vlachs|title=Encyclopædia Britannica|edition=11th|location=New York|year=1907|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last2=Ransohoff |first2=Jake |pages=1–23 |c=Introduction |last1=Aschenbrenner |first1=Nathanael |in1=Aschenbrenner |in2=Ransohoff |anchor-year=2022a |year=2022}}
* {{cite book|last=Beaton|first=Roderick|title=The Medieval Greek Romance|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|year=1996|isbn=0-415-12032-2|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |pages=349–367 |chapter=From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium" |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis |in1=Aschenbrenner |in2=Ransohoff |year=2022}}
* {{cite book|last=Beckwith|first=John|title=Early Christian and Byzantine Art|location=New Haven|publisher=Yale University Press|origyear=1970|year=1993|isbn=0-300-05296-0|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ash |first=John |author-link=John Ash (writer) |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantinejourney00ashj |title=A Byzantine Journey |publisher=Random House |date=1995 |isbn=978-1-84511-307-0 |location=New York |url-access=registration}}
* {{cite book|last=Béhar|first=Pierre|title=Vestiges d'Empires: La Décomposition de l'Europe Centrale et Balkanique|location=Paris|publisher=Éditions Desjonquères|year=1999|isbn=2-84321-015-1|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ball |first=Jennifer |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/ocm60402087 |title=Byzantine Dress: Representations of Secular Dress in Eighth- to Twelfth-Century Painting |date=2005 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-4039-6700-8 |edition=1st |series=The New Middle Ages |location=New York |oclc=ocm60402087}}
* {{cite book|last=Benz|first=Ernst|title=The Eastern Orthodox Church: Its Thought and Life|year=1963|location=Piscataway|publisher=Aldine Transaction|isbn=978-0-202-36298-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q5Z_evECb1UC|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last1=Bideleux|first1=Robert|last2=Jeffries|first2=Ian|title=A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|year=1998|isbn=0-415-16111-8|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Beaton |first=Roderick |author-link=Roderick Beaton |title=The Medieval Greek Romance |location=London and New York |publisher=Routledge |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-415-12032-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Béhar |first=Pierre |title=Vestiges d'Empires: La Décomposition de l'Europe Centrale et Balkanique |trans-title=Vestiges of Empires: The Decay of Central and Balkan Europe |publisher=Éditions Desjonquères |date=1999 |isbn=978-2-84321-015-0 |location=Paris |lang=fr}}
* {{cite book|last=Birkenmeier|first=John W.|title=The Development of the Komnenian Army: 1081–1180|location=Leiden|publisher=Brill|year=2002|isbn=90-04-11710-5|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=Berndt |first1=Guido M. |author1-link=:de:Guido M. Berndt |last2=Steinacher |first2=Roland |author2-link=Roland Steinacher |year=2014 |title=Arianism: Roman Heresy and Barbarian Creed |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8RsGDAAAQBAJ |location=London & New York |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |isbn=978-1-4094-4659-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Blume|first=Fred H.|editor-last=Kearley|authorlink=Fred H. Blume|editor-first=Timothy|title=Annotated Justinian Code|year=2008|url=http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/index.html|location=Laramie|publisher=University of Wyoming|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Bowersock|first=G.M.|title=Julian the Apostate|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=1997|isbn= 978-0-674-48882-3|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Bennett |first=David |title=Medicine and Pharmacy in Byzantine Hospitals: A Study of the Extant Formularies |isbn=9780367879082 |doi=10.4324/9781315551142 |year=2016 |publisher=Routledge |location=London and New York}}
* {{cite book|last=Bray|first=R. S.|title=Armies of Pestilence: The Impact of Disease on History|publisher=James Clarke|year=2004|isbn=0-227-17240-X|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Blöndal |first=Sigfús |author-link=Sigfús Blöndal |editor-last=Benedikz |editor-first=Benedict |title=The Varangians of Byzantium |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1979 |isbn=9780521035521}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Bideleux |first1=Robert |title=A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change |last2=Jeffries |first2=Ian |publisher=Routledge |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-16111-4 |location=London and New York}}
* {{cite book|last=Browning|first=Robert|chapter=The Continuity of Hellenism in the Byzantine world: Appearance or Reality?|pages=111–128|editor1-last=Winnifrith|editor1-first=Tom|editor2-last=Murray|editor2-first=Penelope|title=Greece Old and New|year=1983|location=New York|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=0-333-27836-4|ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brown |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Brown (historian) |title=Eastern and Western Christendom in Late Antiquity: A Parting of the Way |journal=Studies in Church History |year=1976|volume=13 |pages=1–24 |doi=10.1017/S0424208400006574}}
* {{cite book|last=Browning|first=Robert|title=The Byzantine Empire|location=Washington, DC|publisher=The Catholic University of America Press|year=1992|isbn=0-8132-0754-1|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Browning |first=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantineempire0000brow |title=The Byzantine Empire |publisher=The Catholic University of America Press |date=1992 |isbn=978-0-8132-0754-4 |location=Washington, DC |url-access=registration |author-link=Robert Browning (Byzantinist)}}
* {{cite book|last=Bryce|first=James|title=Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Vol. 1|publisher=H. Frowde|year=1901|isbn=1-4021-9046-8|ref=harv}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Browning |first=Robert |editor-last1=Lucas |editor-first1=Donald William |editor-link1=D. W. Lucas |editor-last2=Mackridge |editor-first2=Peter A. |editor-link2=Peter Mackridge |year=2022 |title=Greek Literature: Byzantine Literature |encyclopedia=] |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |location=Chicago |url=https://www.britannica.com/art/Greek-literature/Byzantine-literature#ref299806 |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last=Brooke|first=Zachary Nugent|title=A History of Europe, from 911 to 1198|location=London|publisher=Methuen|year=1962|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Burns|first=Thomas S.|title=A History of Ostrogoths|location=Bloomington and Indianapolis|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1991|isbn=0-253-20600-6|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |author-link=Averil Cameron |title=Byzantine Christianity: A Very Brief History |publisher=Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge |year=2017|isbn=9780281076147 |location=London}}
* {{cite journal |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title= Late Antiquity and Byzantium: An Identity Problem |journal=Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies |year=2016 |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=27–37 |doi=10.1017/byz.2015.4 |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last=Bury|first=John Bagnall|authorlink=J. B. Bury|title=History of the Later Roman Empire|location=London|publisher=Macmillan|year=1923|url=http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/BURLAT/home.html|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |title= |publisher=Psychogios |date=2009 |isbn=978-960-453-529-3 |location=Athens |language=el |script-title=el:Οι Βυζαντινοί |trans-title=The Byzantines |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last1=Bury|first1=John Bagnall|last2=Philotheus|title=The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century: With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos|year=1911|location=London|publisher=Oxford University Press|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Cameron |first=Averil |author-link=Averil Cameron |date=2002 |chapter=The 'Long' Late Antiquity: A Twentieth-Century Model |title=Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome |editor-last=Wiseman |editor-first=T. P. |editor-link=T. P. Wiseman |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York |pages=165–191 |chapter-url=https://www.academia.edu/11134386 |access-date=12 December 2023 |archive-date=9 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240209191020/https://www.academia.edu/11134386 |url-status=live |isbn=9780197263235 |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last1=Bury|first1=John Bagnall|title=The Early History of the Slavonic Settlements in Dalmatia, Croatia, & Serbia|location=New York|publisher=Macmillan|year=1920|url=https://archive.org/stream/earlyhistoryofsl00consrich|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |year=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=2 |editor1-last=Casiday|editor1-first=Augustine|editor2-last=Norris|editor2-first=Frederick W. |isbn=9781139054133 |location=Cambridge and New York}}
* {{cite journal|last=Cameron|first=Averil|authorlink=Averil Cameron|year=1979|title=Images of Authority: Elites and Icons in Late Sixth-century Byzantium|doi=10.1093/past/84.1.3|journal=Past and Present|volume=84|issue=1|page=3|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Casiday |first=Augustine |last2=Norris |first2=Frederick W. |c=Introduction |year=2007 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |anchor-year=2007a}}
* {{cite book|last=Cameron|first=Averil|title=The Byzantines|year=2006|location=Oxford|publisher=Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-9833-2|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Drake |first=Harold A. |author-link=Harold A. Drake |c=The Church, Society and Political Power |pp=403–428 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |year=2007}}
* {{cite book|last=Cameron|first=Averil|script-title=el:Οι Βυζαντινοί|location=Athens|publisher=Psychogios|year=2009|language=Greek |isbn=978-960-453-529-3|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Löhr |first=Winrich |c=Western Christianities |pp=7–51 |in1=Casiday |in2=Norris |year=2007}}
* {{cite book|last=Campbell|first=George L.|title=Compendium of the World's Languages: Abaza to Kurdish|year=2000|origyear=1991|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-20296-5|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chitwood |first=Zachary |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/byzantine-legal-culture-and-the-roman-legal-tradition-8671056/EDF3AD1A74C4461805235605257DF9D6 |title=Byzantine Legal Culture and the Roman Legal Tradition, 867–1056 |date=2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-18256-1 |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/9781316861547}}
* {{cite book|last=Chapman|first=John H.|title=Studies on the Early Papacy|year=1971|publisher=Kennikat Press, University of Michigan|isbn=0-8046-1139-4|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Clark |first=Victoria |url=https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_o2c0 |title=Why Angels Fall: A Journey through Orthodox Europe from Byzantium to Kosovo |publisher=Macmillan |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-312-23396-9 |location=London}}
* {{cite book|last=Chrysos|first=Evangelos|title=Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990 (Society for the Promotion of Byzant)|year=1992|publisher=Variorum|isbn=0-86078-338-3|editor=Jonathan Shepard, Simon Franklin|chapter=Byzantine Diplomacy, CE 300–800: Means and End|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Constantelos |first=Demetrios |author-link=Demetrios Constantelos |title=Christian Hellenism: Essays and Studies in Continuity and Change |year=1998 |publisher=Aristides D. Caratzas |series=Studies in the Social & Religious History of the Medieval Greek World |volume=3 |location=New Rochelle, New York and Athens |isbn=978-0-89241-588-5 |url=https://archive.org/details/christianhelleni0000cons/mode/2up |url-access=registration}}
* {{cite book|last=Clark|first=Victoria|title=Why Angels Fall: A Journey through Orthodox Europe from Byzantium to Kosovo|location=London|publisher=Macmillan|year=2000|isbn=0-312-23396-5|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Cormack |editor-first1=Robin |year=2008 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies |isbn=978-0-1917-4352-8 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York|editor-link=Robin Cormack |url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxford-handbook-of-byzantine-studies-oxford-handbooks-jeffreys-elizabeth-hal/mode/2up |editor-last2=Haldon |editor-first2=John F. |editor-last3=Jeffreys |editor-first3=Elizabeth |editor-link2=John Haldon |editor-link3=Elizabeth Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Cohen|first=H. Floris|title=The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry|location=Chicago|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=1994|isbn=0-226-11280-2|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Brandes |first=Wolfram |c=Revenues and Expenditure |in1=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=562–570 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Comrie|first=Bernard|chapter=Russian|pages=91–152|editor-last=Shopen|editor-first=Timothy|title=Languages and Their Status|location=Philadelphia|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|year=1987|isbn=0-8122-1249-5|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Bryer |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Bryer |in=Cormack |year=2008 |c=Food, Wine, and Feasting |pages=669–676 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Davies|first=Norman|authorlink=Norman Davies|title=Europe: A History|year=1996|location=Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=0-19-820171-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Decker |first=Michael |in=Cormack |year=2008 |c=Everyday Technologies |pages=492–502 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite journal|last=Day|first=Gerald W.|title=Manuel and the Genoese: A Reappraisal of Byzantine Commercial Policy in the Late Twelfth Century|journal=The Journal of Economic History|volume=37 |issue=2|pages=289–301|doi=10.1017/S0022050700096947|year=1977|jstor=2118759|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Greatrex |first=Geoffrey |c=Political-Historical Survey, c. 250–518 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=233–248 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Dennis|first=George T.|title=Three Byzantine Military Treatises|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|year=1985|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Haldon |first=John F |c=Political-Historical Survey, c. 518–800 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=John Haldon |anchor-year=2008a |pages=249–263 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Diehl|first=Charles|chapter=Byzantine Art|editor1-last=Baynes|editor1-first=Norman Hepburn|editor2-last=Moss|editor2-first=Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort|title=Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization|location=Oxford|publisher=Clarendon|year=1948|oclc=1058121|ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal|last=Drake|first=H. A.|title=Constantine and Consensus|journal=Church History|volume=64|issue=1|year=1995|pages=1–15|jstor=3168653|ref=harv}} ** {{harvc |last=Haldon |first=John F |c=The Army |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=John Haldon |anchor-year=2008b |pages=554–561 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
** {{harvc |last=Harvey |first=Alan |c=The Village |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=328–334 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last1=Duiker|first1=William J.|last2=Spielvogel|first2=Jackson J.|title=The Essential World History|year=2010|location=Boston|publisher=Wadsworth|isbn=978-0-495-90227-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Holmes |first=Catherine |c=Political-Historical Survey, 800–1204 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=264–279 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=El-Cheikh|first=Nadia Maria|title=Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs|publisher=Harvard University Press|location=Cambridge, MA|year=2004|isbn=0-932885-30-6|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Howard-Johnston |first=James F |c=Byzantium and Its Neighbours |in=Cormack |year=2008 |author-link=James Howard-Johnston |pages=939–956 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Esler|first=Philip Francis|title=The Early Christian World|year=2004|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-33312-1|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Jeffreys |first=Elizabeth |in=Cormack |year=2008 |anchor-year=2008a |c=Entertainments, Theatre, And Hippodrome |pages=677–684 |author-link=Elizabeth Jeffreys |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Evans|first=James Allan Stewart|title=The Emperor Justinian and the Byzantine Empire|location=Westport|publisher=Greenwood|year=2005|isbn=0-313-32582-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Jeffreys |first=Michael |c=Literacy |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=796–802 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Evans|first=Helen C.|title=Byzantium, Faith and Power (1261–1557)|year=2004|location=New York, NY|publisher=Metropolitan Museum of Art/Yale University Press|isbn=1-58839-114-0|url=http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/58371/rec/3|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki |author-link=Angeliki Laiou |c=Political-Historical Survey, 1204–1453 |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=280–294 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last=Fine|first=John V.A.|title=The early medieval Balkans|publisher=The University of Michigan Press|year=1983|isbn=0-472-08149-7|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Markopoulos |first=Athanasios |c=Education |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=785–795 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite journal|last=Foss|first=Clive|year=1975|title=The Persians in Asia Minor and the End of Antiquity|journal=The English Historical Review|volume=90|issue=357|pages=721–747|doi=10.1093/ehr/XC.CCCLVII.721|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Pryor |first=John |c=Shipping and Seafaring |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=482–491 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last1=Fossier|first1=Robert|last2=Sondheimer|first2=Janet|title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of the Middle Ages|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1997|isbn=0-521-26644-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Stathakopoulos |first=Dionysios Ch. |c=Population, Demography, and Disease |in=Cormack |year=2008 |pages=309–316 |in2=Haldon |in3=Jeffreys}}
* {{cite book|last1=Fouracre|first1=Paul|last2=Gerberding|first2=Richard A.|title=Late Merovingian France: History and Hagiography, 640–720|location=Manchester|publisher=Manchester University Press|year=1996|isbn=0-7190-4791-9|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Freeman|first=Charles|title=The Greek Achievement The Foundation of the Western World|location=New York|publisher=Penguin|year=1999|isbn=0-670-88515-0|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Cormack |first=Robin |author-link=Robin Cormack |year=2018 |orig-year=2000 |title=Byzantine Art |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0-19-877879-0 |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=JnlQDwAAQBAJ}} }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Curl |first1=James Stevens |author-link1=James Stevens Curl |last2=Wilson |first2=Susan |year=2021 |encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Architecture |title=Byzantine Architecture |edition=3rd Edition Revised<!--Distinct from 3rd Edition not revised--> |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0-19-191874-2 |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191918742.001.0001/acref-9780191918742-e-755 |url-access=subscription}}
* {{cite book|last1=Friell|first1=Gerard|last2=Williams|first2=Stephen|title=Theodosius: The Empire at Bay|publisher=Routledge|year=2005|isbn=978-1-135-78262-7|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Davidson |first=Alan |editor-first1=Tom |editor-last1=Jaine |author-link=Alan Davidson (food writer) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Companion to Food |location=Oxford and New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2014 |isbn=978-0-19-967733-7 |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=14 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160514144822/https://books.google.com/books?id=RL6LAwAAQBAJ |url-status=live |editor1-link=Tom Jaine}}
* {{cite book|last=Gabriel|first=Richard A.|year=2002|title=The Great Armies of Antiquity|location=Westport|publisher=Greenwood|isbn=0-275-97809-5|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |author-link=Richard MacGillivray Dawkins |last=Dawkins |first=R. M. |year=1916 |url=https://archive.org/details/moderngreekinas00hallgoog |title=Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A Study of the Dialects of Siĺli, Cappadocia and Phárasa, with Grammar, Texts, Translations and Glossary |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{cite book|last=Garland|first=Lynda|year=1999|title=Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, CE 527–1204|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-14688-7|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dickey |first=Eleanor |author-link=Eleanor Dickey |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108888387/type/book |title=Latin Loanwords in Ancient Greek: A Lexicon and Analysis |date=2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-88838-7 |edition=1st |location=Cambridge and New York |doi=10.1017/9781108888387 |access-date=21 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240209190604/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/latin-loanwords-in-ancient-greek/F5D4E8C56689A2584BD68753B99CCDE9 |archive-date=9 February 2024 |url-status=live |s2cid=258920619}}
* {{cite book|last=Gibbon|first=Edward|authorlink=Edward Gibbon|title=The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volumes II, III, and IX)|editor=J. B. Bury (with an Introduction by W. E. H. Lecky)|location=New York|publisher=Fred de Fau|year=1906|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite conference |last=Dingledy |first=Frederick |date=2019-05-02 |title=The Corpus Juris Civilis: A Guide to Its History and Use |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/meq6c |access-date=2024-08-26 |doi=10.31228/osf.io/meq6c}}
* {{cite book|last=Grabar|first=André|title=L'iconoclasme Byzantin: le dossier archéologique|publisher=Flammarion|year=1984|isbn=2-08-081634-9|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Dowley|first=Tim|title=A Short Introduction to the History of Christianity |publisher=Fortress Press|year=2018|isbn=978-1-5064-4597-7|location=Minneapolis}}
* {{cite journal|last=Grant|first=Robert M.|jstor=1202069|title=Religion and Politics at the Council at Nicaea|journal=The Journal of Religion|volume=55|issue=1|year=1975|pages=1–12|ref=harv|doi=10.1086/486406}}
* {{Cite book |last=Faas |first=Patrick |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |title=Around the Roman Table: Food and Feasting in Ancient Rome |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-226-23347-5 |orig-date=1994 |access-date=20 June 2015 |archive-date=30 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160730151401/https://books.google.com/books?id=YXGlAr17oekC |url-status=live |location=Chicago}}
* {{cite book|last1=Greatrex|first1=Geoffrey B.|editor-last=Maas|editor-first=Michael|chapter=Byzantium and the East in the Sixth Century|title=The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2005|pages=477–509|isbn=0-521-81746-3|ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Fousek |first1=Jan |last2=Kaše |first2=Vojtěch |last3=Mertel |first3=Adam |last4=Výtvarová |first4=Eva |last5=Chalupa |first5=Aleš |date=26 December 2018 |title=Spatial Constraints on the Diffusion of Religious Innovations: The Case of Early Christianity in the Roman Empire |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=13 |issue=12 |pages=e0208744 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0208744 |pmid=30586375 |pmc=6306252 |bibcode=2018PLoSO..1308744F |ref={{harvid|Fousek et al|2018}} |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book|last1=Greatrex|first1=Geoffrey|last2=Lieu|first2=Samuel N. C.|title=The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars (Part II, 363–630 AD)|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|isbn=0-415-14687-9|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Gregory|first=Timothy E.|title=A History of Byzantium|location=Malden|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|year=2010|isbn=1-4051-8471-X|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last1=Friell |first1=Gerard |title=Theodosius: The Empire at Bay |last2=Williams |first2=Stephen |publisher=Routledge |date=2005 |isbn=978-1-135-78262-7 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |last=Garland |first=Lynda |author-link=Lynda Garland |title=Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, AD 527–1204 |publisher=Routledge |location=London and New York |date=1999 |isbn=978-0-415-14688-3 |access-date=21 June 2022 |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116221034/https://books.google.com/books?id=a5GFAgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Grierson|first=Philip|title=Byzantine Coinage|year=1999|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|url=http://www.doaks.org/byzcoins.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000204/http://www.doaks.org/byzcoins.pdf|archivedate=27 September 2007|deadurl=yes|isbn=0-88402-274-9|format=PDF|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Garland |first=Lynda |title=Byzantine Women: Varieties of Experience, 800–1200 |date=2006 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-0-7546-5737-8 |series=Publications for the Centre for Hellenic Studies, King's College, London |location=Aldershot, Burlington (Vt.)}}
* {{cite book|last=Gross|first=Feliks|title=Citizenship and Ethnicity: The Growth and Development of a Democratic Multiethnic Institution|year=1999|location=Westport|publisher=Greenwood|isbn=0-313-30932-9|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Dawson |first=Timothy |c=Propriety, Practicality, Pleasure: The Parameters of Women's Dress in Byzantium, A.D. 1000-1200 |in=Garland |year=2006 |pages=41–76}}
* {{cite book|last=Gutas|first=Dimitri|title=Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement|year=1998|isbn=0-415-06132-6|location=New York and London|publisher=Routledge|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gregory |first=Timothy E. |title=A History of Byzantium |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |date=2010 |isbn=978-1-4051-8471-7 |location=Malden |author-link=Timothy E. Gregory}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hacikyan|first1=Agop Jack|last2=Basmajian|first2=Gabriel|last3=Franchuk|first3=Edward S.|last4=Ouzounian|first4=Nourhan|title=The Heritage of Armenian Literature: From the Sixth to the Eighteenth Century|location=Detroit|publisher=Wayne State University Press|year=2002|isbn=0-8143-3023-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Haldon|first=John|title=Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1990|isbn=978-0-521-31917-1|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Goldhill |first=Simon |chapter=Latin Literature and Greek |date=2024-01-31 |title=The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature |pages=847–906 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-36330-3 |location=Cambridge and New York |editor1-last=Gibson |editor1-first=Roy |editor1-link=Roy Gibson (classicist) |editor2-last=Whitton |editor2-first=Christopher |author-link=Simon Goldhill}}
* {{cite book |last=Grosdidier de Matons |first=Jean |year=1967 |chapter=La Femme dans l'Empire Byzantin |trans-chapter=Women in the Byzantine Empire |title=Histoire Mondiale de la Femme |trans-title=World History of Women |volume=I |pages=11–43 |language=fr |location=Paris |publisher=Nouvelle librairie de France |oclc=490034792}}
* {{cite book|last=Haldon|first=John|title=The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East VI: Elites Old and New in the Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East|year=2004|publisher=Darwin|editor=John Haldon and Lawrence I. Conrad|chapter=The Fate of the Late Roman Senatorial Elite: Extinction or Transformation?|isbn=0-87850-144-4|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Harper |first=Kyle |date=2010 |title=Slave Prices in Late Antiquity (and in the Very Long Term) |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27809564 |journal=Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte |volume=59 |issue=2 |pages=206–238 |doi=10.25162/historia-2010-0013 |issn=0018-2311 |jstor=27809564 |s2cid=160720781}}
* {{cite web|last=Halsall|first=Paul|title=East Asian History Sourcebook: Chinese Accounts of Rome, Byzantium and the Middle East, c. 91 B.C.E. – 1643 C.E.|url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/eastasia/romchin1.html|location=New York|publisher=Fordham University|year=1998|accessdate=21 April 2012|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Jonathan|year=2014|title=Byzantium and the Crusades|publisher=Bloomsbury|edition=2nd|isbn=978-1-78093-767-0|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Harris |title=Byzantium and the Crusades |publisher=Bloomsbury |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-78093-767-0 |edition=2nd |location=London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney}}
* {{cite book|last=Harvey|first=Alan|title=Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire, 900–1200|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003|isbn=0-521-52190-4|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Jonathan |title=Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium |date=2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4742-5466-3 |edition=Second |location=London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi and Sydney |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last=Haywood|first=John|title=Cassell's Atlas of World History|location=London|publisher=Cassell|year=2001|origyear=1997|isbn=0-304-35757-X|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Hindley |first=Geoffrey |url=https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofcr0000hind |title=A Brief History of the Crusades |publisher=Robinson |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-84119-766-1 |location=London |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite conference |last1=Horn |first1=Fred |title=Foundations of Digital Archæoludology |date=2019-05-31 |arxiv=1905.13516 |access-date=2025-01-10 |last2=Schädler |first2=Ulrich |chapter=3.4 Forensic Game Reconstruction |pages=9–10 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336574703 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Heather|first=Peter|title=The Fall of the Roman Empire|year=2005|location=London|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=978-0-330-49136-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dYR4ngEACAAJ|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Howard-Johnston |first=James |date=2008b |title=John H. Pryor and Elizabeth M. Jeffreys, The Age of the ΔPOMΩN: the Byzantine Navy ca. 500–1204. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006. Pp. lxxvii, 754. |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S030701310000536X/type/journal_article |journal=Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies |language=en |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=239–241 |doi=10.1017/S030701310000536X |issn=0307-0131 |author-link=James Howard-Johnston}}
* {{cite book|last=Hindley|first=Geoffrey|title=A Brief History of the Crusades|year=2004|location=London|publisher=Robinson|isbn=978-1-84119-766-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hooper|first1=Nicholas|last2=Bennett|first2=Matthew|title=The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: The Middle Ages|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1996|isbn=0-521-44049-1|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Howard-Johnston |first=James |title=Byzantium: Economy, Society, Institutions 600–1100 |date=2024 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198897880 |location=Oxford and New York}}
* {{cite journal |last=Ivanič |first=Peter |title=The Origins of Christianity in the Territory of Czech and Slovak Republics Within the Contexts of Written Sources |url=https://www.academia.edu/70908086 |journal=European Journal of Science and Theology |volume=12 |issue=6 |date=2016 |pages=123–130 |access-date=9 June 2023 |archive-date=6 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230606030707/https://www.academia.edu/70908086 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=James|first=Liz|title=A Companion to Byzantium|location=Chichester|publisher=John Wiley|year=2010|isbn=1-4051-2654-X|ref=harv}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=James |first=Liz |author-link=Liz James |editor-last=Brigstocke |editor-first=Hugh |year=2003 |orig-year=2001 |encyclopedia=The Oxford Companion to Western Art |title=Byzantine Art |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0-19-866203-7 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662037.001.0001/acref-9780198662037-e-423}}
* {{cite book|last=Jenkins|first=Romilly James Heald|authorlink=Romilly James Heald Jenkins|title=Byzantium: The Imperial Centuries, CE 610–1071|location=Toronto|publisher=University of Toronto Press|year=1987|isbn=0-8020-6667-4|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Jones|first=Arnold Hugh Martin|title=The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social Economic and Administrative Survey|location=Baltimore|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|year=1986|isbn=0-8018-3353-1|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |editor1-last=Johnson |editor1-first=Scott Fitzgerald |title=The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity |date=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-027753-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KEYSDAAAQBAJ |location=Oxford and New York}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaiser |first=Wolfgang |c=Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis |in=Johnson |year=2015 |pp=119–148}}
* {{cite book|last=Kaegi|first=Walter Emil|title=Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003|isbn=0-521-81459-6|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Stolte |first=Bernard H. |c=The Law of New Rome: Byzantine Law |in=Johnson |year=2015 |pp=355–373}}
* {{cite book|last=Kaldellis|first=Anthony|title=Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition|year=2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|isbn=0-521-87688-5|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=A. H. M. |author-link=A. H. M. Jones |location=Oxford |publisher=Basil Blackwell |url=http://archive.org/details/JonesLaterRomanEmpire02 |title=The Later Roman Empire 284–602 |volume=II |language=English |date=1986}}
* {{cite journal|last=Karlin-Heyer|first=P.|year=1967|title=When Military Affairs Were in Leo's Hands|journal=Tradition|volume=23|pages=15–40|jstor=27830825|ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |first=Alexander |last=Jones |title=The Works of Archimedes: Translation and Commentary. Volume 1: The Two Books On the Sphere and the Cylinder |journal=Notices of the AMS |volume=52 |issue=5 |url=https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302190047/https://www.ams.org/notices/200505/rev-jones.pdf |archive-date=2 March 2022 |year=2005 |pages=520–525}}
* {{cite book|editor-last=Kazhdan|editor-first=Alexander Petrovich|editor-link=Alexander Kazhdan|title=]|location=New York and Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1991|isbn=978-0-19-504652-6|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last1=Kazhdan|first1=Alexander Petrovich|last2=Constable|first2=Giles|title=People and Power in Byzantium: An Introduction to Modern Byzantine Studies|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|year=1982|isbn=0-88402-103-3|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis |title=Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-87688-9 |location=Cambridge and New York}}
* {{cite web |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=Late Antiquity Dissolves |date=18 September 2015 |website=Marginalia: Forum on Late Antiquity and the Humanities |access-date=12 December 2023 |url=https://themarginaliareview.com/late-antiquity-dissolves-by-anthony-kaldellis/ |archive-date=13 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213011114/https://themarginaliareview.com/late-antiquity-dissolves-by-anthony-kaldellis/ |url-status=live |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last1=Kazhdan|first1=Aleksandr Petrovich|last2=Epstein|first2=Ann Wharton|title=Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries|location=Berkeley and Los Angeles|publisher=University of California Press|year=1985|isbn=0-520-05129-7|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=The Oxford World History of Empire: Volume Two: The History of Empires |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2021a |editor-last=Fibiger Bang |editor-first=Peter |editor1-link=Peter Fibiger Bang |chapter=The Byzantine Empire (641–1453 CE) |pages=450–467 |editor-last2=Bayly |editor-first2=C. A. |editor2-link=Christopher Bayly |editor-last3=Scheidel |editor-first3=Walter |editor3-link=Walter Scheidel |isbn=9780197532768 |location=New York |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last=Kean|first=Roger Michael|title=Forgotten Power: Byzantium: Bulwark of Christianity|location=Shropshire|publisher=Thalamus|year=2006|isbn=1-902886-07-0|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |title=The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium |date=2023 |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |author-mask=3 |isbn=978-0197549322}}
* {{cite journal|title=Reviews: ''The Astronomical Works of Gregory Chioniades, Volume I: The Zij al- Ala'i'' by Gregory Chioniades, ]; ''An Eleventh-Century Manual of Arabo-Byzantine Astronomy'' by Alexander Jones|first=David A.|last=King|journal=]|volume=82|issue=1|date=March 1991|pages=116–118|doi=10.1086/355661|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Karras |first=Valerie A. |date=2004 |title=Female Deacons in the Byzantine Church |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4146526 |journal=Church History |volume=73 |issue=2 |pages=272–316 |doi=10.1017/S000964070010928X |jstor=4146526 |s2cid=161817885 |issn=0009-6407 |access-date=2 February 2024 |archive-date=5 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305131943/http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146526 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last=Klein|first=Holgen A.|title=Eastern Objects and Western Desires: Relics and Reliquaries between Byzantium and the West|journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers|volume=58|year=2004|pages=283–314|jstor=3591389|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kazhdan |first1=Alexander Petrovich |author-link=Alexander Kazhdan |title=Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries |last2=Wharton |first2=Annabel Jane |author-link2=Annabel Jane Wharton |publisher=University of California Press |year=1990 |isbn=9780520069626 |series=Transformation of the Classical Heritage |volume=7 |location=Berkeley, Los Angeles and London}}
* {{cite book|last=Kountoura-Galake|first=Eleonora|title=Ο βυζαντινός κλήρος και η κοινωνία των "Σκοτεινών Αἰώνων |year=1996|location=Athens|publisher=Ethniko Idryma Erevnon|isbn=978-960-7094-46-9|language=Greek|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |title=Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1991a |isbn=978-0-19-504652-6 |editor-last=Kazhdan |editor-first=Alexander Petrovich |location=Oxford and New York |volume=2 |url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/mode/2up}}
* {{cite journal|last=Kuhoff|first=Wolfgang|year=2002|title=Die diokletianische Tetrarchie als Epoche einer historischen Wende in antiker und moderner Sicht|doi=10.1007/BF02898434|journal=International Journal of the Classical Tradition|volume=9|issue=2|pages=177–194|jstor=30224306|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Browning |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Browning (Byzantinist) |url-access=subscription |in=Kazhdan |year=1991a |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-3001 |c=Language |pages=1175–1177}}
* {{cite book|last=Laiou|first=Angeliki E.|authorlink=Angeliki Laiou|title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2)|year=2002|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|editor=Angeliki E. Laiou|chapter=Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries|pages=697–708|url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb36-trade|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Conomos |first=Dimitri E. |year=1991a |anchor-year=1991 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1419/mode/2up |pages=1424–1426 |c=Music |in=Kazhdan}}
* {{cite book|last1=Laiou|first1=Angeliki E.|last2=Morisson|first2=Cécile|title=The Byzantine Economy|year=2007|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-84978-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last1=Conomos |first1=Dimitri E. |last2=Kazhdan |first2=Alexander |year=1991a |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1421/mode/2up |pages=1426–1427 |c=Musical Instruments |in=Kazhdan |anchor-year=1991}}
* {{cite book|last=Laiou|first=Angeliki E.|title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 1) |year=2002|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|editor=Angeliki E. Laiou|chapter=Writing the Economic History of Byzantium|pages=3–8|url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/EHB01-Writing%20the%20economic%20history%20of%20Byzantium.pdf|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander Petrovich |year=1991a |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/the-oxfrod-dictionary-of-byzantium-vol.-1-oup-1991/The%20Oxfrod%20Dictionary%20of%20Byzantium_Vol.%202_OUP_1991/page/1228/mode/2up |pages=1234–1237 |c=Literature |in=Kazhdan |anchor-year=1991b}}
* {{cite book|last1=Lapidge|first1=Michael|last2=Blair|first2=John|last3=Keynes|first3=Simon |title=The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England|location=Malden|publisher=Blackwell|year=1998|isbn=0-631-22492-0|ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal|last=Lenski|first=Noel|year=1999|title=Assimilation and Revolt in the Territory of Isauria, From the 1st Century BC to the 6th Century AD |journal=Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient|issn=0022-4995|volume=42|pages=413–465|doi= 10.1163/1568520991201687|jstor=3632602|ref=harv}} * {{Cite journal |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |date=1990a |title=Byzantine Hagiography and Sex in the Fifth to Twelfth Centuries |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1291623 |journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=44 |pages=131–143 |doi=10.2307/1291623 |jstor=1291623 |issn=0070-7546 |access-date=30 January 2024}}
* {{cite book |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |year=1999 |title=A History of Byzantine Literature (650–850) |publisher=Institute for Byzantine Research |location=Athens |url=https://archive.org/details/Kazhdan1999ByzLit01/mode/2up |url-access=registration |isbn=978-960-371-010-3 |author-mask=3}}
* {{cite book|last=Louth|first=Andrew|title=The New Cambridge Medieval History (Volume I)|editor=Paul Fouracre and Rosamond McKitterick|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2005|isbn=0-521-36291-1|chapter=The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Madden|first=Thomas F.|authorlink=Thomas Madden|title=Crusades: The Illustrated History|location=Ann Arbor|publisher=University of Michigan Press|year=2005|isbn=0-472-03127-9|ref=harv}} * {{cite journal |last=Kenworthy |first=Scott M. |title=Beyond Schism: Restoring Eastern Orthodoxy to the History of Christianity |journal=Reviews in Religion and Theology |volume= 15 |issue=2 |year=2008 |pages=171–178 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9418.2007.00377_1.x}}
* {{cite journal |title=Review of: Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition. Empire and After |url=https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2012/2012.06.10/ |journal=Bryn Mawr Classical Review |issn=1055-7660 |date=2012-06-10 |first=Christina |last=Kokkinia}}
* {{cite book|last=Magdalino|first=Paul|title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2)|year=2002|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|editor=Angeliki E. Laiou|chapter=Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development|pages=529–537|url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb20-cp|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Economic History of Byzantium. From the Seventh Through the Fifteenth Century |volume=1 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |year=2002a |editor-last=Laiou |editor-first=Angeliki E. |location=Washington, DC |url=https://archive.org/details/economicbizant/mode/2up |isbn=9780884022886 |editor-link=Angeliki Laiou}}
* {{cite book|last=Magdalino|first=Paul|title=The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2002|isbn=0-521-52653-1|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Markis |first=George |c=Ships |in=Laiou |year=2002a |pages=89–98}}
* {{cite book|last=Mango|first=Cyril A.|authorlink=Cyril Mango|title=Η Αυτοκρατορία της Νέας Ρώμης |location=Athens|publisher=Educational Institution of the National Bank of Greece|year=2007|language=Greek |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Mango|first=Cyril A.|authorlink=Cyril Mango|title=The Oxford History of Byzantium|location=Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2002|isbn=0-19-814098-3|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |title=The Economic History of Byzantium. From the Seventh Through the Fifteenth Century |volume=2 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |year=2002b |editor-first=Angeliki E. |editor-last=Laiou |location=Washington, DC |isbn=978-0884022886}}
** {{harvc |pages=878–897 |last=Kalligas |first=Haris |c=Monemvasia, Seventh–Fifteenth Centuries |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002}}
* {{cite book|last=Matschke|first=Klaus-Peter|title=The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2)|year=2002|location=Washington, DC|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|editor=Angeliki E. Laiou|chapter=Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries|pages=771–806|url=http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb37-trade-late|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |pages=625–632|c=Medieval Athens |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120218231247/http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/EconHist/EHB29.pdf |last=Kazanaki-Lappa |first=Maria |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002}}
* {{cite book|last=McDonnell|first=Myles Anthony|title=Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2006|isbn=978-0-521-82788-1|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Laiou |first=Angeliki E. |c=Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries |pages=681–754 |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002c |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114425/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb36-trade}}
* {{cite journal|last=Meier|first=William N.|year=2003|title=Die Inszenierung einer Katastrophe: Justinian und der Nika-Aufstand|issue=142|pages=273–300|journal=Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik|jstor=20191600|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |pages=519–527 |chapter=Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114407/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb20-cp |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Magdalino |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002b}}
* {{cite book|last1=Merryman|first1=John Henry|last2=Perez-Perdomo|first2=Rogelio|title=The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America|year=2007|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=978-0-8047-5569-6|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |pages=771–806 |chapter=Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries |chapter-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130930114138/http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/doaks-online-publications/byzantine-studies/the-economic-history-of-byzantium/ehb37-trade-late |last=Matschke |first=Klaus-Peter |in=Laiou |year=2002b |anchor-year=2002}}
* {{cite book|last=Meyendorff|first=John|authorlink=John Meyendorff|title=The Byzantine Legacy in the Orthodox Church|year=1982|location=Yonkers|publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press|isbn=0-913836-90-7|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Laiou |first1=Angeliki E. |title=The Byzantine Economy |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/byzantine-economy/59786C4CA132FDEAA9F7F31472FAC2CB |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-521-84978-4 |last2=Morrisson |first2=Cécile}}
* {{cite book|last=Millar|first=Fergus|title=A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450)|location=Berkeley and Los Angeles|publisher=University of California Press|year=2006|isbn=0-520-24703-5|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lavan |first=Myles |date=2016 |title=The Spread of Roman Citizenship, 14–212 ce: Quantification in the Face of High Uncertainty |url=https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/230/1/3/2460651?redirectedFrom=fulltext |journal=Past & Present |issue=230 |pages=3–46 |doi=10.1093/pastj/gtv043 |issn=0031-2746 |hdl=10023/12646 |hdl-access=free}}
* {{cite journal|last=Miller|first=William|title=Monemvasia|journal=The Journal of Hellenic Studies|volume=27|year=1907|url=https://archive.org/stream/journalofhelleni27sociuoft|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Moravcsik|first=Gyula|title=Byzantium and the Magyars|year=1970|location=Amsterdam|publisher=Hakkert|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Lazaris |first=Stavros |title=A Companion to Byzantine Science |series=Brill's Companions to the Byzantine World |volume=6 |publisher=Brill |location=Leiden and Boston |year=2020 |doi=10.1163/9789004414617 |isbn=978-90-04-41461-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lenski |first=Noel |chapter=Slavery in the Byzantine Empire |date=2021-08-12 |title=The Cambridge World History of Slavery |pages=453–481 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-02472-3 |volume=2: AD 500–AD 1420 |location=Cambridge and New York}}
* {{cite journal|last=Neumann|first=Iver B.|year=2006|title=Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary|journal=Millennium: Journal of International Studies |volume=34|issue=3|pages=865–888|issn=1569-2981|ref=harv|doi=10.1177/03058298060340030201}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Levy |first=Kenneth |others=Revised by Christian Troelsgård |editor-first1=Christian |editor-last1=Troelsgård |year=2016 |orig-year=2001 |encyclopedia=] |title=Byzantine Chant |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.04494 |isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000004494 |ref={{sfnRef|Levy|Troelsgård|2016}} |author-link=Kenneth Levy}} {{Grove Music subscription}}
* {{cite book|last=Neville|first=Leonora Alice|title=Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society, 950–1100|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2004|isbn=0-521-83865-7|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Nicol|first=Donald MacGillivray|title=The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1993|isbn=0-521-43991-4|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Lindberg |first=David |author-link=David C. Lindberg |title=The Beginnings of Western Science |title-link=The Beginnings of Western Science |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1992 |isbn=9780226482057 |location=Chicago}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Longchamps de Berier |first=Franciszek |url=https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/55fa5981-b54b-4cd9-8cbb-6568c90f7f0a |title=The Praetor as a Promoter of "Bonum Commune" |date=2014 |isbn=978-88-495-2825-1 |journal=LR Legal Roots |volume=3
* {{cite book|last=Norwich|first=John Julius|title=A Short History of Byzantium|location=Ringwood, Vic.|publisher=Penguin|year=1998|isbn=978-0-14-025960-5|ref=harv}}
|pages=217–231 |issn=2280-4994}}
* {{cite journal|last=Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou|first=Maria|year=1970|title=Συμβολή εις την χρονολόγησιν των Αβαρικών και Σλαβικών επιδρομών επί Μαυρικίου (582–602) (μετ' επιμέτρου περί των Περσικών πολέμων) |language=Greek|url=http://www.byzsym.org/index.php/bz/article/view/649/567|journal=Byzantina Symmeikta|issn=1105-1639 |volume=2 |pages=145–206|accessdate=10 March 2012|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Obolensky|first=Dimitri|authorlink=Dimitri Obolensky|title=Byzantium and the Slavs|year=1994|location=Yonkers|publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press|isbn=0-88141-008-X|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Lowden |first=John |author-link=John Lowden |year=1997 |title=Early Christian & Byzantine Art |publisher=Phaidon Press |location=London |isbn=978-0-7148-3168-8 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_2900714831687}}
* {{cite book |title=New Cambridge Medieval History |volume=1: c. 500 – c. 700 |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |date=2005 |chapter=The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century |pages=289–316 |isbn=9781139053938 |editor1-last=Fouracre |editor1-first=Paul |editor1-link=Paul Fouracre}}
* {{cite journal|last=Oikonomides|first=Nikos|year=1999|title=L᾽"Unilinguisme" Officiel de Constantinople Byzantine|url=http://www.byzsym.org/index.php/bz/article/view/857/753|journal=Byzantina Symmeikta|issn=1105-1639|volume=13|pages=9–22|accessdate=11 March 2012|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Ostrogorsky|first=George|authorlink=George Alexandrovič Ostrogorsky|title=History of the Byzantine State|location=New Brunswick|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=1969|isbn=0-8135-1198-4|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=MacGeorge |first=Penny |title=Late Roman Warlords |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-925244-2 |series=Oxford Classical Monographs |location=Oxford and New York}}
* {{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/ocm50270189 |title=The Oxford History of Byzantium |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-814098-6 |editor-last=Mango |editor-first=Cyril A. |location=Oxford and New York |oclc=ocm50270189 |editor-link=Cyril Mango}}
* {{cite journal|last=Ostrogorsky|first=George|title=The Byzantine Empire in the World of the Seventh Century|journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers|volume=13|pages=1–21|year=1959|jstor=1291126|ref=harv|doi=10.2307/1291127}}
** {{harvc |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |c=The Medieval Empire (780–1204) |in=Mango |year=2002 |author-link=Paul Magdalino |pages=169–213}}
* {{cite book|last1=Paparrigopoulos|first1=Constantine|author1-link=Constantine Paparrigopoulos|last2=Karolidis|first2=Pavlos|author2-link=Pavlos Karolidis|title=Ιστορία του Ελληνικού Έθνους , vol. 4|publisher=Eleftheroudakis|language=Greek|year=1925|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Reinert |first=Stephen W. |c=Fragmentation (1204–1453) |in=Mango |year=2002 |pages=248–283}}
* {{cite book|last=Parry|first=Kenneth|title=Depicting the Word: Byzantine Iconophile Thought of the Eighth and Ninth Centuries|location=Leiden and New York|publisher=Brill |year=1996|isbn=90-04-10502-6|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Sarris |first=Peter |c=The Eastern Roman Empire from Constantine to Heraclius (306–641) |in=Mango |year=2002 |pages=19–70}}
* {{cite book|last=Patterson|first=Gordon M.|title=The Essentials of Medieval History: 500 to 1450 AD, the Middle Ages|location=Piscataway|publisher=Research and Education Association|year=1995|origyear=1990|isbn=978-0-87891-705-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Perrottet|first=Tony|title=The Naked Olympics: The True Story of the Ancient Games|publisher=Random House|year=2004|isbn=978-1-58836-382-4|ref=harv}} ** {{harvc |last=Treadgold |first=Warren |c=The Struggle for Survival (641–780) |in=Mango |year=2002 |author-link=Warren Treadgold |pages=129–152}}
* {{cite book|last1=Postan|first1=Michael Moïssey|last2=Miller|first2=Edward|last3=Postan|first3= Cynthia|title=The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (Volume 2)|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1987|isbn=0-521-08709-0|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last1=Matthews |first1=Roy T. |last2=Platt |first2=F. DeWitt |title=The Western Humanities |date=1997|publisher=Michigan State University|isbn=9781559344333|location=East Lansing}}
* {{cite book|last=Pounds|first=Norman John Greville|title=An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500–1840|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1979|isbn=0-521-22379-2|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=McDonnell |first=Myles Anthony |title=Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-521-82788-1 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{cite book|last=Read|first=Piers Paul|authorlink=Piers Paul Read|title=The Templars: The Dramatic History of the Knights Templar, The Most Powerful Military Order of the Crusades|location=New York|publisher=St. Martin's Press|year=2000|origyear=1999|isbn=0-312-26658-8|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Mellas |first=Andrew |year=2020 |title=Liturgy and the Emotions in Byzantium: Compunction and Hymnody |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-1-108-76736-1 |doi=10.1017/9781108767361 |s2cid=225623021}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Merryman |first1=John Henry |url=https://www.worldcat.org/title/ocm81252739 |title=The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America |last2=Pérez-Perdomo |first2=Rogelio |date=2007 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-5568-9 |edition=3rd |location=Stanford, Calif |oclc=ocm81252739 |author1-link=John Henry Merryman}}
* {{cite book|last=Reinert|first=Stephen W.|editor=Cyril Mango|chapter=Fragmentation (1204–1453)|title=The Oxford History of Byzantium|location=Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2002|pages=248–283|isbn=0-19-814098-3|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Meyendorff |first=John |author-link=:ru:Мейендорф, Иван Феофилович |title=Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes |publisher=Fordham University Press |year=1979 |edition=illustrated, reprint, revised |isbn=978-0-8232-0967-5 |location=New York |url=https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Byzantine-Theology-Historical-Trends-and-Doctrinal-Themes-by-John-Meyendorff-z-lib.org_.epub_.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240823182542/https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Byzantine-Theology-Historical-Trends-and-Doctrinal-Themes-by-John-Meyendorff-z-lib.org_.epub_.pdf |archive-date=23 August 2024 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Rice|first=David Talbot|authorlink=David Talbot Rice|title=Byzantine Art (3rd Edition)|year=1968|location=Harmondsworth|publisher=Penguin Books Limited|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Millar |first=Fergus |author-link=Fergus Millar |url=https://archive.org/details/greekromanempire00ferg |title=A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450) |publisher=University of California Press |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-520-24703-1 |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles}}
* {{cite book|last=Robins|first=Robert Henry|title=The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History|year=1993|location=Berlin and New York|publisher=Mouton de Gruyter|isbn=3-11-013574-4|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Rosser|first=John H.|title=Historical Dictionary of Byzantium|chapter=Introduction|location=Lanham, MA|publisher=Scarecrow|year=2011|isbn=0-8108-7567-5|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |last=Miller |first=Timothy S. |title=The Birth of the Hospital in the Byzantine Empire |isbn=9780801856570 |location=Baltimore and London |doi=10.56021/9780801826764 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |year=1997}}
* {{cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|title=The Fall of Constantinople, 1453|year=1990|isbn=0-521-39832-0|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |editor1-last=Mitchell |editor1-first=Margaret M. |editor1-link=Margaret M. Mitchell |editor2-last=Young |editor2-first=Frances |editor2-link=Frances Young |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |volume=1 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-05483-6 |year=2006 |location=Cambridge}}
** {{harvc |last=Cameron |first=Averil |year=2006 |c=Constantine and the 'Peace of the Church' |anchor-year=2006b |in1=Mitchell |in2=Young |pp=538–551 |author-link=Averil Cameron}}
* {{cite journal|last=Sarantis|first=Alexander|year=2009|title=War and Diplomacy in Pannonia and the Northwest Balkans during the Reign of Justinian: The Gepid Threat and Imperial Responses|journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers|volume=63|pages=15–40|jstor=41219761|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Neumann |first=Iver B. |date=2006 |title=Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary |author-link=Iver B. Neumann |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6cc4/347b1f756fc236a4468b43e1cee5206b54f2.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=Millennium: Journal of International Studies |volume=34 |issue=3 |pages=865–888 |doi=10.1177/03058298060340030201 |issn=1569-2981 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727060750/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6cc4/347b1f756fc236a4468b43e1cee5206b54f2.pdf |archive-date=27 July 2020 |s2cid=144773343}}
* {{cite book|last=Sedlar|first=Jean W.|title=East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500|volume=III|location=Seattle|publisher=University of Washington Press|year=1994|isbn=0-295-97290-4|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Seton-Watson|first=Hugh|title=The Russian Empire, 1801–1917|location=Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1967|isbn=0-19-822152-5|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Neville |first=Leonora Alice |title=Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society, 950–1100 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-521-83865-8 |location=Cambridge}}
* {{cite journal |last=Nicholson |first=Graham |title=The Understanding of Papal Supremacy as Revealed in the Letters of Pope Gregory the Great |journal=Theological Studies |volume=11 |year=1960 |pages=25–51 |url=https://www.medievalists.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Understanding-of-Papal-Supremacy.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107095542/https://www.medievalists.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/Understanding-of-Papal-Supremacy.pdf |archive-date=7 November 2023 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Šišić|first=Ferdo|authorlink=Ferdo Šišić|title=Povijest Hrvata u vrijeme narodnih vladara: sa 280 slika i 3 karte u bojama|location=Zagreb|publisher=Nakladni zavod Matice hrvatske|year=1990|isbn=86-401-0080-2|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nicol |first=Donald M. |title=The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350–c. 1450 |title-link=The Cambridge History of Political Thought |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1988 |isbn=978-0-52-142388-5 |editor-last=Burns |editor-first=J. H. |pages=51–79 |chapter=Byzantine Political Thought |author-link=Donald Nicol |editor-link=J. H. Burns |location=Cambridge |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jEa8Iv5wJ0IC&pg=PA51}}
* {{cite book|last=Sotinel|first=Claire|chapter=Emperors and Popes in the Sixth Century: The Western View|editor-last=Maas|editor-first=Michael|title=The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2005|pages=267–290|isbn=0-521-81746-3|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |first=Donald M. |last=Nicol |author-link=Donald Nicol |title=The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453 |author-mask=3 |edition=2nd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y2d6OHLqwEsC |year=1993 |publisher=Rupert Hart-Davis |location=London |isbn=9780521439916 |access-date=11 December 2023 |archive-date=9 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230709030914/https://books.google.com/books?id=y2d6OHLqwEsC |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal|last=Speck|first=Paul|journal=Poikila Byzantina|volume=4|year=1984|title=Ikonoklasmus und die Anfänge der Makedonischen Renaissance|pages=175–210|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Stephenson|first=Paul|title=Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2000|isbn=0-521-77017-3|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |editor1-last=Noble |editor1-first=Thomas F. X. |editor2-last=Smith |editor2-first=Julia M. H. |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-139-05422-5 |title=The Cambridge History of Christianity |volume=3 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |editor2-link=Julia M. H. Smith |location=Cambridge and New York}}
** {{harvc |last=Brown |first=Peter |author-link=Peter Brown (historian) |year=2008 |c=Introduction: Christendom, c. 600 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |pp=1–18}}
* {{cite book|last1=Tarasov|first1=Oleg|last2=Milner-Gulland|first2=R. R.|title=Icon and Devotion: Sacred Spaces in Imperial Russia|location=London|publisher=Reaktion|year=2004|isbn=1-86189-118-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Kolbaba |first=Tia M. |c=Latin and Greek Christians |pp=213–229 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |year=2008}}
* {{cite book|last1=Tatakes|first1=Vasileios N.|last2=Moutafakis|first2=Nicholas J.|title=]|year=2003|location=Indianapolis|publisher=Hackett|isbn=0-87220-563-0|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=The Emergence of Byzantine Orthodoxy, 600–1095 |in1=Noble |in2=Smith |year=2008 |pp=46–64}}
* {{cite journal|last=Teall|first=John L.|year=1967|title=The Age of Constantine Change and Continuity in Administration and Economy|journal=Dumbarton Oaks Papers|volume=21|pages=11–36|jstor=1291256|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nutton |first=Vivian |author-link=Vivian Nutton |chapter=From Galen to Alexander, Aspects of Medicine and Medical Practice in Late Antiquity |pages=1–14 |editor-last=Scarborough |editor-first=John |title=Symposium on Byzantine Medicine |year=1984 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks |series=Dumbarton Oaks Papers |volume=38 |jstor=1291489 |isbn=9780884021391 |url=https://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/series/dopapers/for-readers/past-issues/volume-38 |location=Washington, D. C. |doi=10.2307/1291489 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/DOP38_02_Nutton/mode/2up}}
* {{cite book|last=Timberlake|first=Alan|title=A Reference Grammar of Russian|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2004|isbn=978-0-521-77292-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Treadgold|first=Warren|title=Byzantium and Its Army, 284–1081|location=Stanford|publisher=Stanford University Press|year=1995|isbn=0-8047-2420-2|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Obolensky |first=Dimitri |title=Byzantium and the Slavs |publisher=St Vladimir's Seminary Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-88141-008-2 |location=Yonkers |author-link=Dimitri Obolensky}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Oikonomides |first=Nikos |date=1999 |title=L᾽"Unilinguisme" Officiel de Constantinople Byzantine |trans-title=The Official Monolingualism of Byzantine Constantinople |journal=Byzantina Symmeikta |volume=13 |pages=9–22 |doi=10.12681/byzsym.857 |issn=1105-1639 |doi-access=free |language=fr |author-link=Nikolaos Oikonomides}}
* {{cite book|last=Treadgold|first=Warren|title=A History of the Byzantine State and Society|location=Stanford|publisher=Stanford University Press|year=1997|isbn=0-8047-2630-2|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Papaconstantinou |first=Arietta |title=Conversion in Late Antiquity: Christianity, Islam, and Beyond |year=2016 |publisher=Routledge |chapter=Introduction |pages=xv–xxxvii |isbn=978-1-4094-5738-1 |location=London |author-link=Arietta Papaconstantinou}}
* {{cite book|last=Troianos|first=Spyros|last2=Velissaropoulou-Karakosta|first2=Julia|title=Ιστορία δικαίου από την αρχαία στην νεώτερη Ελλάδα |location=Athens|publisher=Sakkoulas|year=1997|isbn=960-232-594-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Vasiliev|first=Alexander Alexandrovich|authorlink=Alexander Vasiliev (historian)|title=History of the Byzantine Empire|year=1928–1935|location=Madison|publisher=The University of Wisconsin Press|url=http://www.intratext.com/X/ENG0832.HTM|isbn=0-299-80925-0|ref=harv}} * {{cite book |editor-last=Papaioannou |editor-first=Stratis |year=2021 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Literature |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-935176-3}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaldellis |first=Anthony |year=2021 |chapter=The Reception of Classical Literature and Ancient Myth |in=Papaioannou |pages=162–179 |author-link=Anthony Kaldellis}}
* {{cite book|last=Versteegh|first=Cornelis H. M.|title=Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking|year=1977|isbn=90-04-04855-3|location=Leiden|publisher=Brill|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Martín |first=Inmaculada Pérez |year=2021 |chapter=Modes of Manuscript Transmission (Ninth–Fifteenth Centuries) |in=Papaioannou |pages=682–706}}
* {{cite book|last=Watson|first=Bruce|title=Sieges: A Comparative Study|year=1993|location=Westport|publisher=Praeger|isbn=0-275-94034-9|ref=harv}}
** {{harvc |last=Papaioannou |first=Stratis |year=2021 |anchor-year=2021a |chapter=What Is Byzantine Literature? An Introduction |in=Papaioannou |pages=1–18}}
* {{cite book|last=Weitzmann|first=Kurt|authorlink=Kurt Weitzmann|title=The Icon|year=1982|location=London|publisher=Evans Brothers|isbn=0-237-45645-1|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Wells|first=Herbert George|authorlink=H. G. Wells|title=A Short History of the World|location=New York|publisher=Macmillan|year=1922|isbn=0-06-492674-5|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last=Partington |first=J. R. |author-link=J. R. Partington |title=A History of Greek Fire and Gunpowder |publisher=The Johns Hopkins University Press |year=1999 |isbn=9780801859540 |location=Baltimore and London}}
* {{cite book|last=Whittow|first=Mark|title=The Making of Byzantium, 600–1025|location=Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA|publisher=University of California Press|year=1996|isbn=0-520-20496-4|ref=harv}} * {{Cite book |last1=Pei |first1=Mario |author-link=Mario Pei |title=The Story of Latin and the Romance Languages |last2=Gaeng |first2=Paul A. |date=1976 |publisher=Harper & Row |isbn=978-0-06-013312-2 |location=New York}}
* {{cite journal |last=Poppe |first=Andrzej |year=1991 |title=Christianity and Ideological change in Kievan Rus': The First Hundred Years |journal=Canadian-American Slavic Studies |volume=25 |issue=1–4|pages=3–26|doi=10.1163/221023991X00038}}
* {{cite book|last=Wickham|first=Chris|authorlink=Christopher Wickham|title=The Inheritance of Rome: A History of Europe from 400 to 1000|location=New York|publisher=Viking|year=2009|isbn=0-670-02098-2|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Pryor |first=John H. |chapter=The Dromōn and the Byzantine Navy |title=The Sea in History - The Medieval World |pages=401–411 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781782049104.037 |access-date=2024-08-18 |publisher=Boydell and Brewer |isbn=978-1-78204-910-4 |date=2017 |editor1-last=Buchet |editor1-first=Christian |editor2-last=Balard |editor2-first=Michel |jstor=10.7722/j.ctt1kgqt6m.41 |location=Suffolk and New York |doi=10.1017/9781782049104.037}}
* {{cite journal|last=Wolff|first=Robert Lee|year=1948|title=Romania: The Latin Empire of Constantinople|journal=Speculum|volume=23|issue=1|pages=1–34|jstor=2853672|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Rance |first=Philip |date=2010 |title=The De Militari Scientia or Müller Fragment as a Philological Resource. Latin in the East Roman Army and Two New Loanwords in Greek: Palmarium and *Recala |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41219881 |journal=Glotta |volume=86 |issue=1–4 |pages=63–92 |doi=10.13109/glot.2010.86.14.63 |jstor=41219881 |issn=0017-1298 |access-date=23 December 2023 |archive-date=7 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407213721/https://www.jstor.org/stable/41219881 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Wroth|first=Warwick|title=Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum|year=1908|publisher=British Museum Dept. of Coins and Medals|isbn=1-4021-8954-0|ref=harv}}
* {{Cite book |last=Remijsen |first=Sofie |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107279636 |title=The End of Greek Athletics in Late Antiquity |date=2015 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-27963-6 |doi=10.1017/cbo9781107279636}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ring |first=Trudy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |title=International Dictionary of Historic Places: Middle East and Africa |publisher=Taylor & Francis |date=1994 |isbn=978-1-884964-03-9 |volume=4 |access-date=23 October 2016 |archive-date=9 June 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190609091417/https://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC |url-status=live |location=London and New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Robins |first=Robert Henry |title=The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History |publisher=Mouton de Gruyter |date=1993 |isbn=978-3-11-013574-9 |location=Berlin and New York |author-link=R. H. Robins}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rochette |first=Bruno |date=2011 |chapter=Language Policies in the Roman Republic and Empire |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444343397.ch30 |title=A Companion to the Latin Language |pages=549–563 |doi=10.1002/9781444343397.ch30 |hdl=2268/35932 |isbn=9781405186056 |hdl-access=free |access-date=21 December 2023 |archive-date=9 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240209191514/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444343397.ch30 |url-status=live |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |location=London |editor1-last=Clackson |editor1-first=James |editor1-link=James Clackson}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Rochette |first=Bruno |date=2018 |title=Was There a Roman Linguistic Imperialism During the Republic and the Early Principate? |url=https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1418/90426 |journal=Lingue e Linguaggio |issue=1/2018 |pages=107–128 |doi=10.1418/90426 |issn=1720-9331 |access-date=21 December 2023 |archive-date=4 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231004101938/https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1418/90426 |url-status=live |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rochette |first=Bruno |chapter=The Attitude of the Roman Emperors towards Language Practices |title=Social Factors in the Latinization of the Roman West |year=2023 |location=Oxford and New York |chapter-url=https://academic.oup.com/book/55330/chapter/428805545 |editor1-last=Mullen |editor1-first=Alex |access-date=2023-12-22 |edition=1st |publisher=Oxford University Press |language=en |isbn=978-0-19-888729-4 |author-mask=3 |editor1-link=Alex Mullen (academic) |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/55330}}
* {{cite book |last=Rodley |first=Lyn |year=1994 |title=Byzantine Art and Architecture: An Introduction |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, New York and Melbourne |isbn=978-0-521-35724-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/byzantineartarch0000rodl/page/n3/mode/2up |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rosser |first=John H. |title=Historical Dictionary of Byzantium |date=2011 |publisher=Scarecrow Press |isbn=9780810874770 |location=Lanham, Maryland}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rotman |first=Youval |title=Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World |date=2009 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-03611-6 |location=Cambridge (Mass.)}}
* {{Cite journal |title=Review of: Response: Rotman on Lenski on Youval Rotman, Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World |first=Youval |last=Rotman |url=https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2010/2010.07.02 |journal=Bryn Mawr Classical Review |issn=1055-7660 |access-date=9 January 2024 |archive-date=9 January 2024 |date=2010-07-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240109104527/https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2010/2010.07.02 |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rotman |first=Youval |title=Slaveries of the First Millennium |date=2022 |publisher=Amsterdam University Press |isbn=978-1-64189-172-1 |author-mask=3 |location=Amsterdam |doi=10.2307/j.ctv2175h0p |jstor=j.ctv2175h0p}}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Runciman |url=http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.509885 |title=Byzantine Civilisation |date=1933 |publisher=Methuen |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Runciman |first=Steven |title=The Fall of Constantinople, 1453 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=1990 |isbn=978-0-521-39832-9 |author-link=Steven Runciman |location=Cambridge}}
* {{cite book |last1=Sabo |first1=Theodore |title=From Monophysitism to Nestorianism: AD 431–681 |date=2018 |publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing |isbn=978-1-5275-0959-7|location=Newcastle upon Tyne}}
* {{Cite book |last=Salaman |first=Rena |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rbDzAYGcUa8C/page/184 |title=Oxford Symposium on Food & Cookery 1984 & 1985: Cookery: Science, Lore & Books: Proceedings (Introduction by Alan Davidson) |publisher=Prospect Books |date=1986 |isbn=978-0-907325-16-1 |editor-last=Jaine |editor-first=Tom |location=London |pages= |chapter=The Case of the Missing Fish, or ''Dolmathon'' Prolegomena |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jYa3J6xrjt4C |editor-link=Tom Jaine}}
* {{cite web |author=Saliba |first=George |author-link=George Saliba |date=27 April 2006 |title=Islamic Science and the Making of Renaissance Europe |url=https://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=3883 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060629204411/https://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=3883 |archive-date=29 June 2006 |access-date=1 March 2008 |website=]}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Salogubova |first1=Elena |last2=Zenkov |first2=Alan |date=2018-06-15 |title=Roman Law's Influence on Russian Civil Law and Procedure |journal=Russian Law Journal |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=118–133 |doi=10.17589/2309-8678-2018-6-2-118-133 |doi-broken-date=21 January 2025 |issn=2312-3605 |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234045831.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250110105849/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234045831.pdf |archive-date=10 January 2025 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal |last=Salzman |first=Michele Renee |author-link=Michele R. Salzman |title=The Evidence for the Conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity in Book 16 of the 'Theodosian Code |journal=Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte |volume=42 |issue=3 |year=1993 |pages=362–378 |jstor=4436297}}
* {{Cite book |last=Sedlar |first=Jean W. |title=East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500 |publisher=University of Washington Press |date=1994 |isbn=978-0-295-97290-9 |volume=III |location=Seattle}}
* {{Cite book |last=Seton-Watson |first=Hugh |title=The Russian Empire, 1801–1917 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=1967 |isbn=978-0-1982-2152-4 |author-link=Hugh Seton-Watson |location=London |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/russianempire1800000seto/mode/2up}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Shepard |editor-first=Jonathan |year=1990 |title=Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers of the Twenty-fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies |isbn=9780860783381 |publisher=Variorum |location=Cambridge |editor-link=Jonathan Shepard}}
** {{harvc |last=Kazhdan |first=Alexander |c=1: The Notion of Byzantine Diplomacy |in=Shepard |year=1990 |author-link=Alexander Kazhdan |pages=3–24}}
** {{harvc |last=Chrysos |first=Evangelos |c=2: Byzantine Diplomacy, AD 300–800 |in=Shepard |year=1990 |pages=25–40}}
** {{harvc |last=Shepard |first=Jonathan |c=3: Byzantine Diplomacy, AD 800–1204 |in=Shepard |year=1990 |pages=41–72 |anchor-year=1990a}}
** {{harvc |last=Oikonomides |first=Nikolaos |c=4: Byzantine Diplomacy, AD 1204–1453 |in=Shepard |year=1990 |author-link=Nikolaos Oikonomides |pages=73–90}}
** {{harvc |last=Kennedy |first=Hugh |c=7: Byzantine-Arab Diplomacy in the Near East from the Islamic Conquests to the Mid-Eleventh Century |in=Shepard |year=1990 |author-link=Hugh N. Kennedy |pages=133–144}}
** {{harvc |last=Haldon |first=John |c=18: Blood and Ink: Some Observations on Byzantine Attitudes towards Warfare and Diplomacy |in=Shepard |year=1990 |author-link=John Haldon |pages=281–294}}
* {{Cite book |editor-first1=Jonathan |editor-last1=Shepard |date=2009 |title=] |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=978-0-5117-5670-2}}
** {{harvc |last=Angold |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Angold |c=Belle Époque or Crisis? (1025–1118) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=583–626}}
** {{harvc |last=Angold |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Angold |c=After the Fourth Crusade: the Greek Rump States and the Recovery of Byzantium |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009b |pp=731–758}}
** {{harvc |last=Auzépy |first=Marie-France |c=State of Emergency (700–850) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=251–291}}
** {{harvc |last=Kaegi |first=Walter Emil |author-link=Walter Kaegi |c=Confronting Islam: Emperors Versus Caliphs (641 – c. 850) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=365–394}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=Justinian and his legacy (500–600) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009a |pp=97–129}}
** {{harvc |last=Louth |first=Andrew |author-link=Andrew Louth |c=Byzantium Transforming (600–700) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=221–248 |anchor-year=2009b}}
** {{harvc |last=Magdalino |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Magdalino |c=The Empire of the Komnenoi (1118–1204) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=627–663}}
** {{harvc |last=Moorhead |first=John |author-link=John Moorhead |c=Western Approaches (500–600) |in=Shepard |year=2009}}
** {{harvc |last=Shepard |first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Shepard |c=Equilibrium to Expansion (886–1025) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |anchor-year=2009b |pp=493–536}}
** {{harvc |last=Tougher |first=Shaun |c=After Iconoclasm (850–886) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=292–304}}
** {{harvc |last=Whittow |first=Mark |c=The Middle Byzantine Economy (600–1204) |in=Shepard |year=2009 |pp=465–492 |author-link=Mark Whittow}}
* {{cite journal |last=Sinnigen |first=William G. |date=1963 |title=Barbaricarii, Barbari and the Notitia Dignitatum |journal=Latomus |jstor=41524218 |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=806–815}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Spawforth |first=A. J. S. |date=1993 |title=K. Buraselis, ΘΕΙΑ ΔΩΡΕΑ. ΜΕΛΕΤΕΣ ΠΑΝΩ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΥΝΑΣΤΕΙΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΣΕΒΗΡΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ CONSTITUTIO ANTONINIANA (with English summary) (Academy of Athens monograph 1). Athens, p. 254, 1989 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0075435800057245/type/journal_article |journal=Journal of Roman Studies |language=en |volume=83 |page=224 |doi=10.2307/301038 |jstor=301038 |issn=0075-4358}}
* {{Cite book |last=Stathakopoulos |first=Dionysios Ch. |title=A Short History of the Byzantine Empire |date=2023 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-350-23340-9 |series=Short Histories |location=London and New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Stein |first=Peter |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814723 |title=Roman Law in European History |date=1999 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511814723 |isbn=978-0-521-64372-6 |location=Cambridge |author-link=Peter Stein (legal scholar)}}
* {{Cite book |location=London and New York |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136727870 |title=The Byzantine World |date=2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-72787-0 |editor-last=Stephenson |editor-first=Paul}}
* {{Cite book |last=Stolte |first=Bernard |url=https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27972/chapter/211607076 |title=Byzantine Law |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor-last=Pihlajamäki |editor-first=Heikki |volume=1 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.10 |editor-last2=Dubber |editor-first2=Markus D. |editor-last3=Godfrey |editor-first3=Mark |pages=231–232 |location=Oxford and New York}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Byzantines |date=1997 |last=Talbot |first=Alice-Mary |author-link=Alice-Mary Talbot |chapter=Chapter 5: Women |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-09791-6 |editor-last=Cavallo |editor-first=Guglielmo |editor1-link=Guglielmo Cavallo |location=Chicago |pages=117–143}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Tatakes |first1=Vasileios N. |title=Byzantine Philosophy |last2=Moutafakis |first2=Nicholas J. |publisher=Hackett |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-8722-0563-5 |location=Indianapolis}}
* {{Cite book |last=Treadgold |first=Warren T. |title=Byzantium and its Army: 284–1081 |date=1995 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-3163-8 |location=Stanford |author-link=Warren Treadgold}}
* {{A History of the Byzantine State and Society}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Touliatos |first=Diane |year=2001 |encyclopedia=] |title=Byzantine Secular Music |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |doi=10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.48192 |isbn=978-1-56159-263-0 |url-access=subscription |url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000048192}} {{Grove Music subscription}}
* {{Cite book |last=Unwin |first=P. T. H. |title=Wine and the Vine: An Historical Geography of Viticulture and the Wine Trade |date=2010 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-14416-2 |location=London}}
* {{Cite book |last=Üre |first=Pinar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d7rEDwAAQBAJ |title=Reclaiming Byzantium: Russia, Turkey and the Archaeological Claim to the Middle East in the 19th Century |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-78831-012-3 |location=London and New York}}
* {{cite journal |last=van Dieten |first=Jan Louis |year=1980 |title=Die Byzantinische Literatur – Eine Literatur Ohne Geschichte? |trans-title=Byzantine Literature – A Literature Without History? |language=de |journal=] |volume=231 |issue=H 1 |pages=101–109 |doi=10.1524/hzhz.1980.231.jg.101 |jstor=27621785}}
* {{Cite book |last=Vasiliev |first=Aleksandr Aleksandrovich |author-link=Alexander Vasiliev (historian) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EXiWAwAAQBAJ |title=History of the Byzantine Empire, 324–1453 |date=1964 |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-80925-6 |location=Madison, Wisconsin and London |access-date=19 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210808183933/https://books.google.com/books?id=EXiWAwAAQBAJ |archive-date=8 August 2021 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last=Velimirović |first=Miloš |author-link=Miloš Velimirović |editor-first1=Richard |editor-last1=Crocker |editor-first2=David |editor-last2=Hiley |editor-link2=David Hiley |year=1990 |title=The New Oxford History of Music |volume=II: The Early Middle Ages To 1300 |chapter=Byzantine Chant |pages=26–68 |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford and New York |isbn=978-0-19-316329-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/new-oxford-history-of-music/New%20Oxford%20History%20of%20Music%202a%20The%20Early%20Middle%20Ages%20to%201300%20II/mode/2up}}
* {{Cite book |last=Versteegh |first=Cornelis H. M. |title=Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking |publisher=Brill |date=1977 |isbn=978-9-0040-4855-3 |location=Leiden}}
* {{Cite book |last=Vryonis |first=Speros |author-link=Speros Vryonis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |title=The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century |publisher=University of California Press |date=1971 |isbn=978-0-520-01597-5 |location=Berkeley |access-date=25 June 2016 |archive-date=26 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200626102729/https://books.google.com/books?id=wBpIAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Wallace-Hadrill |first=Andrew |date=1998 |title=To Be Roman, Go Greek Thoughts on Hellenization at Rome |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43767621 |journal=Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement |issue=71 |pages=79–91 |jstor=43767621 |issn=2398-3264 |access-date=1 January 2024 |archive-date=28 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231228235559/https://www.jstor.org/stable/43767621 |url-status=live |author-link=Andrew Wallace-Hadrill}}
* {{Cite book |last=Whitby |first=Michael |chapter=Byzantine Diplomacy: Good Faith, Trust and Co-operation in International Relations in Late Antiquity |date=2008 |title=War and Peace in Ancient and Medieval History |pages=120–140 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511496301.008 |access-date=2024-07-26 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |author-link=Michael Whitby |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511496301.008 |isbn=978-0-521-81703-5 |editor1-last=de Souza |editor1-first=Philip |editor2-last=France |editor2-first=John}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wickham |first=Chris |author-link=Chris Wickham |title=The Inheritance of Rome: A History of Europe from 400 to 1000 |date=2009 |publisher=Viking Penguin |isbn=978-0-670-02098-0 |location=New York}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wildberg |first=Christian |author-link=Christian Wildberg |chapter-url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/philoponus/ |title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-link=Edward N. Zalta |access-date=8 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190822110331/https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/philoponus/ |archive-date=22 August 2019 |url-status=live |chapter=John Philoponus}}
* {{Cite book |last=Zhang |first=Yongjin |chapter=Barbarism and Civilization |date=2023 |title=The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations |pages=218–232 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.013.15 |access-date=2024-07-26 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-887345-7 |location=Oxford and New York|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873457.013.15}}
{{Refend}} {{Refend}}

== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book|last1=Ahrweiler|first1=Hélène|last2=Aymard|first2=Maurice|title=Les Européens|year=2000|location=Paris|publisher=Hermann|isbn=2-7056-6409-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Angelov|first=Dimiter|title=Imperial Ideology and Political Thought in Byzantium (1204–1330)|year=2007|location=Cambridge, United Kingdom|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-85703-1}}
* Baboula, Evanthia, Byzantium, in ''Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God'' (2 vols.), Edited by C. Fitzpatrick and A. Walker, Santa Barbara, ABC-CLIO, 2014. ISBN 1-61069-177-6
* {{cite book | author= Evans, Helen C. & Wixom, William D | url=http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15324coll10/id/188784|title=The glory of Byzantium: art and culture of the Middle Byzantine era, A.D. 843-1261 | location=New York | publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art | year=1997 | isbn=978-0-8109-6507-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Cameron|first=Averil|title=Byzantine Matters|year=2014|location=Princeton NJ|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-1-4008-5009-9}}
* {{cite book|last=Haldon|first=John|title=The Byzantine Wars: Battles and Campaigns of the Byzantine Era|year=2001|location=Stroud, Gloucestershire|publisher=Tempus Publishing|isbn=0-7524-1795-9}}
* {{cite book|last=Haldon|first=John|title=Byzantium: A History|location=Stroud, Gloucestershire|publisher=Tempus Publishing|year=2002|isbn=1-4051-3240-X}}
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Jonathan|title=The Lost World of Byzantium|location=New Haven CT and London|publisher=Yale University Press|year=2015|isbn=978-0-300-17857-9}}
* {{cite book|last=Hussey|first=J. M.|title=The Cambridge Medieval History. Vol.&nbsp;IV: The Byzantine Empire|year=1966|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|authorlink=Steven Runciman|title=Byzantine Civilisation|year=1966|location=London|publisher=] Limited|isbn=1-56619-574-8}}
* {{cite book|last=Runciman|first=Steven|title=The Emperor Romanus Lecapenus and his Reign|origyear=1929|year=1990|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-06164-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Stathakopoulos|first=Dionysios|title=A Short History of the Byzantine Empire|year=2014|location=London|publisher=I.B.Tauris|isbn=978-1-78076-194-7}}
* {{cite book|last=Toynbee|first=Arnold Joseph|title=Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World|location=Oxford|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1972|isbn=0-19-215253-X}}
{{Library resources box|onlinebooks=yes}}
{{refend|2}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{Library resources box |onlinebooks = yes}}
{{Commons}}
{{Wikisource portal}}
{{wiktionary|Byzantine}}

* {{In Our Time|Byzantine Empire|p00547j9|Byzantine_Empire}} * {{In Our Time|Byzantine Empire|p00547j9|Byzantine_Empire}}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160718092221/http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ |date=18 July 2016}} by Lars Brownworth of ]; audio lectures.
* . Scholarly biographies of many Byzantine emperors.
* by Lars Brownworth of ]; audio lectures. .
* (Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime). * (Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime).
*

=== Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography ===
* Fox, Clinton R.
* at ]. Includes links to numerous electronic texts. * at ]. Includes links to numerous electronic texts.
* . Links to various online resources. * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008060507/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/byzantium/ |date=8 October 2014}}. Links to various online resources.
* . Online sourcebook. * . Online sourcebook.
* . Resources for medieval history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars. * . Resources for medieval history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars.
* . Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history. * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140814170022/http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook1c.html |date=14 August 2014}}. Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history.
* . Hosted by the ]; in English. * . Hosted by the ]; in English.
* . Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium. * . Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium.
* . * .
* *


{{Clear}}
{{Byzantine Empire topics|state=collapsed}}
{{Byzantine Empire topics |state = collapsed}}
{{Navboxes
| list =
{{Empires}} {{Empires}}
{{History of Turkey timeline}} {{History of Turkey timeline}}
{{Former monarchies Italian peninsula}}
{{Ancient Syria and Mesopotamia}} {{Ancient Syria and Mesopotamia}}
{{Ancient Rome topics}}

{{Featured article}} {{History of Europe}}
}}
{{Subject bar
| portal1 = Ancient Rome
| portal2 = Byzantine Empire
| portal3 = Christianity
| portal4 = Greece
| portal5 = Middle Ages
| commons = y
| s = y
| wikt = y
| wikt-search = Byzantine
| voy = y
}}


{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 18:12, 21 January 2025

Continuation of the Roman Empire (330–1453) "Byzantine" redirects here. For other uses, see Byzantine (disambiguation).

Byzantine Empire
330–1453
The empire in 555 under Justinian I, its greatest extent since the fall of the Western Roman Empire, with vassals in pinkThe empire in 555 under Justinian I, its greatest extent since the fall of the Western Roman Empire, with vassals in pink
CapitalConstantinople (modern-day Istanbul)
Common languages
Religion Christianity (official)
Demonym(s)
GovernmentAutocracy
Notable emperors 
• 306–337 Constantine I
• 379–395 Theodosius I
• 408–450 Theodosius II
• 527–565 Justinian I
• 610–641 Heraclius
• 717–741 Leo III
• 976–1025 Basil II
• 1081–1118 Alexios I
• 1143–1180 Manuel I
• 1261–1282 Michael VIII
• 1449–1453 Constantine XI
Historical eraLate antiquity to Late Middle Ages
Population
• 457 16,000,000
• 565 26,000,000
• 775 7,000,000
• 1025 12,000,000
• 1320 2,000,000
CurrencySolidus, denarius, and hyperpyron

The Byzantine Empire, also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire, was the continuation of the Roman Empire centred in Constantinople during late antiquity and the Middle Ages. The eastern half of the Empire survived the conditions that caused the fall of the West in the 5th century AD, and continued to exist until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453. During most of its existence, the empire remained the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in the Mediterranean world. The term "Byzantine Empire" was only coined following the empire's demise; its citizens referred to the polity as the "Roman Empire" and to themselves as "Romans". Due to the imperial seat's move from Rome to Byzantium, the adoption of state Christianity, and the predominance of Greek instead of Latin, modern historians continue to make a distinction between the earlier Roman Empire and the later Byzantine Empire.

During the earlier Pax Romana period, the western parts of the empire became increasingly Latinised, while the eastern parts largely retained their preexisting Hellenistic culture. This created a dichotomy between the Greek East and Latin West. These cultural spheres continued to diverge after Constantine I (r. 324–337) moved the capital to Constantinople and legalised Christianity. Under Theodosius I (r. 379–395), Christianity became the state religion, and other religious practices were proscribed. Greek gradually replaced Latin for official use as Latin fell into disuse.

The empire experienced several cycles of decline and recovery throughout its history, reaching its greatest extent after the fall of the west during the reign of Justinian I (r. 527–565), who briefly reconquered much of Italy and the western Mediterranean coast. The appearance of plague and a devastating war with Persia exhausted the empire's resources; the early Muslim conquests that followed saw the loss of the empire's richest provinces—Egypt and Syria—to the Rashidun Caliphate. In 698, Africa was lost to the Umayyad Caliphate, but the empire subsequently stabilised under the Isaurian dynasty. The empire was able to expand once more under the Macedonian dynasty, experiencing a two-century-long renaissance. This growth came to an end in 1071 after the defeat by the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Manzikert. Thereafter, periods of civil war and Seljuk incursion resulted in the loss of most of Asia Minor. The empire recovered during the Komnenian restoration, and Constantinople remained the largest and wealthiest city in Europe until the 13th century.

The empire was largely dismantled in 1204, following the Sack of Constantinople by Latin armies at the end of the Fourth Crusade; its former territories were then divided into competing Greek rump states and Latin realms. Despite the eventual recovery of Constantinople in 1261, the reconstituted empire wielded only regional power during its final two centuries of existence. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in perennial wars fought throughout the 14th and 15th centuries. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 ultimately brought the empire to an end. Many refugees who had fled the city after its capture settled in Italy and throughout Europe, helping to ignite the Renaissance. The fall of Constantinople is sometimes used to mark the dividing line between the Middle Ages and the early modern period.

Nomenclature

See also: Names of the Greeks

The inhabitants of the empire, now generally termed Byzantines, thought of themselves as Romans (Romaioi). Their Islamic neighbours similarly called their empire the "land of the Romans" (Bilād al-Rūm), but the people of medieval Western Europe preferred to call them "Greeks" (Graeci), due to having a contested legacy to Roman identity and to associate negative connotations from ancient Latin literature. The adjective "Byzantine", which derived from Byzantion (Latinised as Byzantium), the name of the Greek settlement Constantinople was established on, was only used to describe the inhabitants of that city; it did not refer to the empire, which they called Romanía—"Romanland".

After the empire's fall, early modern scholars referred to the empire by many names, including the "Empire of Constantinople", the "Empire of the Greeks", the "Eastern Empire", the "Late Empire", the "Low Empire", and the "Roman Empire". The increasing use of "Byzantine" and "Byzantine Empire" likely started with the 15th-century historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles, whose works were widely propagated, notably by Hieronymus Wolf. "Byzantine" was used adjectivally alongside terms such as "Empire of the Greeks" until the 19th century. It is now the primary term, used to refer to all aspects of the empire; however, some modern historians believe that, as an originally prejudicial and inaccurate term, it should not be used.

History

Main article: History of the Byzantine Empire

As the historiographical periodizations of "Roman history", "late antiquity", and "Byzantine history" significantly overlap, there is no consensus on a "foundation date" for the Byzantine Empire, if there was one at all. The growth of the study of "late antiquity" has led to some historians setting a start date in the seventh or eighth centuries. Others believe a "new empire" began during changes in c. 300 AD. Still others hold that these starting points are too early or too late, and instead begin c. 500. Geoffrey Greatrex believes that it is impossible to precisely date the foundation of the Byzantine Empire.

Early history (pre-518)

Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Constantinian and Valentinianic dynasties, Byzantine Empire under the Theodosian dynasty, and Byzantine Empire under the Leonid dynasty
A map showing the division of the Roman empire c. 300
Four-way division of the Roman Empire under the Tetrarchy system established by Diocletian.

In a series of conflicts between the third and first centuries BC, the Roman Republic gradually established hegemony over the eastern Mediterranean, while its government ultimately transformed into the one-person rule of an emperor. The Roman Empire enjoyed a period of relative stability until the third century AD, when a combination of external threats and internal instabilities caused the Roman state to splinter as regional armies acclaimed their generals as "soldier-emperors". One of these, Diocletian (r. 284–305), seeing that the state was too big to be ruled by one man, attempted to fix the problem by instituting a Tetrarchy, or rule of four, and dividing the empire into eastern and western halves. Although the Tetrarchy system quickly failed, the division of the empire proved an enduring concept.

Diocletian's reforms significantly altered governmental structure, reach and taxation, and these reforms also had the effect of downgrading the first capital, Rome. Constantine I (r. 306–337) secured sole power in 324. Over the following six years, he rebuilt the city of Byzantium as a capital city, which was renamed Constantinople. Rome was further from the important eastern provinces and in a less strategically important location; it was not esteemed by the "soldier-emperors" who ruled from the frontiers or by the empire's population who, having been granted citizenship, considered themselves "Roman". Constantine extensively reformed the empire's military and civil administration and instituted the gold solidus as a stable currency. He favoured Christianity, which he had converted to in 312.

Constantine's dynasty fought a lengthy conflict against Sasanid Persia and ended in 363 after the death of his son-in-law Julian. The short Valentinianic dynasty, occupied with wars against barbarians, religious debates, and anti-corruption campaigns, ended in the East after the death of Valens at the Battle of Adrianople in 378.

A map showing the western and eastern Roman empires c. 395, divided in the Balkans and North Africa
Division of the empire after the death of Theodosius I in 395.  The Western Roman Empire   The Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire

Valens's successor, Theodosius I (r. 379–395), restored political stability in the east by allowing the Goths to settle in Roman territory; he also twice intervened in the western half, defeating the usurpers Magnus Maximus and Eugenius in 388 and 394 respectively. He actively condemned paganism, confirmed the primacy of Nicene Christianity over Arianism, and established Christianity as the Roman state religion. He was the last emperor to rule both the western and eastern halves of the empire; after his death, the West was destabilised by a succession of "soldier-emperors", unlike the East, where administrators continued to hold power. Theodosius II (r. 408–450) largely left the rule of the east to officials such as Anthemius, who constructed the Theodosian Walls to defend Constantinople, now firmly entrenched as Rome's capital.

Theodosius' reign was marked by the theological dispute over Nestorianism, which was eventually deemed heretical, and by the formulation of the Codex Theodosianus law code. It also saw the arrival of Attila's Huns, who ravaged the Balkans and exacted a massive tribute from the empire; Attila however switched his attention to the rapidly-deteriorating western empire, and his people fractured after his death in 453. After Leo I (r. 457–474) failed in his 468 attempt to reconquer the west, the warlord Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus in 476, killed his titular successor Julius Nepos in 480, and the office of western emperor was formally abolished.

Through a combination of luck, cultural factors, and political decisions, the Eastern empire never suffered from rebellious barbarian vassals and was never ruled by barbarian warlords—the problems which ensured the downfall of the West. Zeno (r. 474–491) convinced the problematic Ostrogoth king Theodoric to take control of Italy from Odoacer, which he did; dying when the empire was at peace, Zeno was succeeded by Anastasius I (r. 491–518). Although his Monophysitism brought occasional issues, Anastasius was a capable administrator and instituted several successful financial reforms including the abolition of the chrysargyron tax. He was the first emperor, since Diocletian, who did not face any serious problems affecting his empire.

518–717

Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty and Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty A close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden colored background. The person has a dark brown cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, three jewels on his right shoulder, a crown with two pendants each hanging from both ends and an aura like circle around his headA close up photograph of a mosaic of a person painted on a golden colored background. The person has a white cloth covering up his upper body till the neck, an embroidered pattern on his right shoulder, wavy hair, a stubble beard and a moustacheEmperor Justinian (left), and the general Belisarius (right). Mosaics, 6th century, from the Basilica of San Vitale, Ravenna, Italy

The reign of Justinian I was a watershed in Byzantine history. Following his accession in 527, the law-code was rewritten as the influential Corpus Juris Civilis and Justinian produced extensive legislation on provincial administration; he reasserted imperial control over religion and morality through purges of non-Christians and "deviants"; and having ruthlessly subdued the 532 Nika revolt he rebuilt much of Constantinople, including the original Hagia Sophia. Justinian took advantage of political instability in Italy to attempt the reconquest of lost western territories. The Vandal Kingdom in North Africa was subjugated in 534 by the general Belisarius, who then invaded Italy; the Ostrogothic Kingdom was destroyed in 554.

In the 540s, however, Justinian began to suffer reversals on multiple fronts. Taking advantage of Constantinople's preoccupation with the West, Khosrow I of the Sasanian Empire invaded Byzantine territory and sacked Antioch in 540. Meanwhile, the emperor's internal reforms and policies began to falter, not helped by a devastating plague that killed a large proportion of the population and severely weakened the empire's social and financial stability. The most difficult period of the Ostrogothic war, against their king Totila, came during this decade, while divisions among Justinian's advisors undercut the administration's response. He also did not fully heal the divisions in Chalcedonian Christianity, as the Second Council of Constantinople failed to make a real difference. Justinian died in 565; his reign saw more success than that of any other Byzantine emperor, yet he left his empire under massive strain.

Financially and territorially overextended, Justin II (r. 565–578) was soon at war on many fronts. The Lombards, fearing the aggressive Avars, conquered much of northern Italy by 572. The Sasanian wars restarted that year, and continued until the emperor Maurice finally emerged victorious in 591; by that time, the Avars and Slavs had repeatedly invaded the Balkans, causing great instability. Maurice campaigned extensively in the region during the 590s, but although he managed to re-establish Byzantine control up to the Danube, he pushed his troops too far in 602—they mutinied, proclaimed an officer named Phocas as emperor, and executed Maurice. The Sasanians seized their moment and reopened hostilities; Phocas was unable to cope and soon faced a major rebellion led by Heraclius. Phocas lost Constantinople in 610 and was soon executed, but the destructive civil war accelerated the empire's decline.

A map centred on West Asia, with the territories controlled by the Sassanian Empire colored light brown. All of modern day Iran, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Syria, Iraq, Israel, Palestine; southern Yemen, northern Arabia and Egypt along with a bulge through Turkey are colored light brownA photograph of a large double-layered fortification.Top: the Sasanian Empire at its territorial apex under Khosrow II
Bottom: the Theodosian Walls of Constantinople, critically important during the 717–718 siege.

Under Khosrow II, the Sassanids occupied the Levant and Egypt and pushed into Asia Minor, while Byzantine control of Italy slipped and the Avars and Slavs ran riot in the Balkans. Although Heraclius repelled a siege of Constantinople in 626 and defeated the Sassanids in 627, this was a pyrrhic victory. The early Muslim conquests soon saw the conquest of the Levant, Egypt, and the Sassanid Empire by the newly-formed Arabic Rashidun Caliphate. By Heraclius' death in 641, the empire had been severely reduced economically as well as territorially—the loss of the wealthy eastern provinces had deprived Constantinople of three-quarters of its revenue.

The next seventy-five years are poorly documented. Arab raids into Asia Minor began almost immediately, and the Byzantines resorted to holding fortified centres and avoiding battle at all costs; although it was invaded annually, Anatolia avoided permanent Arab occupation. The outbreak of the First Fitna in 656 gave Byzantium breathing space, which it used wisely: some order was restored in the Balkans by Constans II (r. 641–668), who began the administrative reorganisation known as the "theme system", in which troops were allocated to defend specific provinces. With the help of the recently rediscovered Greek fire, Constantine IV (r. 668–685) repelled the Arab efforts to capture Constantinople in the 670s, but suffered a reversal against the Bulgars, who soon established an empire in the northern Balkans. Nevertheless, he and Constans had done enough to secure the empire's position, especially as the Umayyad Caliphate was undergoing another civil war.

Justinian II sought to build on the stability secured by his father Constantine but was overthrown in 695 after attempting to exact too much from his subjects; over the next twenty-two years, six more rebellions followed in an era of political instability. The reconstituted caliphate sought to break Byzantium by taking Constantinople, but the newly crowned Leo III managed to repel the 717–718 siege, the first major setback of the Muslim conquests.

718–867

Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty, Byzantine Empire under the Nikephorian dynasty, and Byzantine Empire under the Amorian dynasty
Two gold coins, each depicting a man
Gold solidus of Leo III (left), and his son and heir, Constantine V (right)

Leo and his son Constantine V (r. 741–775), two of the most capable Byzantine emperors, withstood continued Arab attacks, civil unrest, and natural disasters, and reestablished the state as a major regional power. Leo's reign produced the Ecloga, a new code of law to succeed that of Justinian II, and continued to reform the "theme system" in order to lead offensive campaigns against the Muslims, culminating in a decisive victory in 740. Constantine overcame an early civil war against his brother-in-law Artabasdos, made peace with the new Abbasid Caliphate, campaigned successfully against the Bulgars, and continued to make administrative and military reforms. However, due to both emperors' support for the Byzantine Iconoclasm, which opposed the use of religious icons, they were later vilified by Byzantine historians; Constantine's reign also saw the loss of Ravenna to the Lombards, and the beginning of a split with the Roman papacy.

In 780, Empress Irene assumed power on behalf of her son Constantine VI. Although she was a capable administrator who temporarily resolved the iconoclasm controversy, the empire was destabilized by her feud with her son. The Bulgars and Abbasids meanwhile inflicted numerous defeats on the Byzantine armies, and the papacy crowned Charlemagne as Roman emperor in 800. In 802, the unpopular Irene was overthrown by Nikephoros I; he reformed the empire's administration but died in battle against the Bulgars in 811. Military defeats and societal disorder, especially the resurgence of iconoclasm, characterised the next eighteen years.

Map centred on Western Europe. The territories of the Byzantine Empire are shaded dark green; namely the Italian islands, southern Greece, south-central Bulgaria, southern Crimea and most of Turkey.
The Byzantine Empire c. 814.

Stability was somewhat restored during the reign of Theophilos (r. 829–842), who exploited economic growth to complete construction programs, including rebuilding the sea walls of Constantinople, overhaul provincial governance, and wage inconclusive campaigns against the Abbasids. After his death, his empress Theodora, ruling on behalf of her son Michael III, permanently extinguished the iconoclastic movement; the empire prospered under their sometimes-fraught rule. However, Michael was posthumously vilified by historians loyal to the dynasty of his successor Basil I, who assassinated him in 867 and who was given credit for his predecessor's achievements.

867–1081

Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty and Byzantine Empire under the Doukas dynasty

Basil I (r. 867–886) continued Michael's policies. His armies campaigned with mixed results in Italy but defeated the Paulicians of Tephrike. His successor Leo VI (r. 886–912) compiled and propagated a huge number of written works. These included the Basilika, a Greek translation of Justinian I's law-code which included over 100 new laws created by Leo; the Tactica, a military treatise; and the Book of the Eparch, which codified Constantinople's trading regulations. In non-literary contexts Leo was less successful: the empire lost in Sicily and against the Bulgarians, while he provoked theological scandal by marrying four times in an attempt to father a legitimate heir.

The early reign of that heir, Constantine VII, was tumultuous, as his mother Zoe, his uncle Alexander, the patriarch Nicholas, the powerful Simeon I of Bulgaria, and other influential figures jockeyed for power. In 920, the admiral Romanos I used his fleet to secure power, crowning himself and demoting Constantine to the position of junior co-emperor. His reign, which brought peace with Bulgaria and successes in the east under the general John Kourkouas, was ended in 944 by the machinations of his sons, whom Constantine soon usurped in turn. Constantine's ineffectual sole rule has often been construed as the zenith of Byzantine learning, but while several works were compiled, they were largely intended to legitimise and glorify the emperor's Macedonian dynasty. His son and successor died young; under two soldier-emperors, Nikephoros II (r. 963–969) and John I Tzimiskes (r. 969–976), the Roman army claimed numerous military successes, including the conquest of Cilicia and Antioch, and a sensational victory against Bulgaria and the Kievan Rus' in 971. John in particular was an astute administrator who reformed military structures and implemented effective fiscal policies.

After John's death, Constantine VII's grandsons Basil II and Constantine VIII ruled jointly for half a century, although the latter exercised no real power. Their early reign was occupied by conflicts against two prominent generals, Bardas Skleros and Bardas Phokas, which ended in 989 with the former's death and the latter's submission, and with a power struggle against the eunuch Basileios, who was dismissed in 985. Basil, who for unknown reasons never married or had children, subsequently refused to delegate any authority: he sidelined the military establishment by taking personal command of the army and promoting officers loyal to him. His reign was preoccupied with the decades-long campaign against Bulgaria, which ended in total Byzantine victory at the Battle of Kleidion in 1018. Diplomatic efforts, critical for that success, also contributed to the annexation of several Georgian provinces in the 1020s and coexistence with the new Fatimid Caliphate. When he died in 1025, Basil's empire stretched from the Danube and Sicily in the west to the Euphrates in the east; his swift expansion was, however, unaccompanied by administrative reforms.

Depiction of an army attacking a walled town
The seizure of Edessa (1031) by the Byzantines under George Maniakes and the counterattack by the Seljuk Turks

After Constantine VIII's death in 1028, his daughters, the empresses Zoe (r. 1028–1052) and Theodora (r. 1042–1056), held the keys to power: four emperors (Romanos III, Michael IV, Michael V, and Constantine IX) ruled only because of their connection to Zoe, while Michael VI (r. 1056–1057) was selected by Theodora. This political instability, regular budget deficits, a string of expensive military failures, and other problems connected to over-extension led to substantial issues in the empire; its strategic focus moved from maintaining its hegemony to prioritizing defence.

The empire soon came under sustained assault on three fronts, from the Seljuk Turks in the east, the Pecheneg nomads in the north, and the Normans in the west. The Byzantine army struggled with confronting these enemies, who did not organise themselves as traditional states and were thus untroubled by defeats in set-piece battles. The year 1071 brought two consequential reverses: Bari, the last remaining Byzantine settlement in Italy, was captured by the Normans, while the Seljuks won a decisive victory at the Battle of Manzikert, taking the emperor Romanos IV Diogenes prisoner. The latter event sparked a decade-long civil war, during which the Seljuks took possession of Anatolia up to the Sea of Marmara.

1081–1204

Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty and Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty

One prominent general, Alexios I, usurped the throne in 1081. In contrast to the prior turmoil, the three reigns of Alexios (r. 1081–1118), his son John II (r. 1118–1143), and his grandson Manuel I (r. 1143–1180) lasted a century and restored the empire's regional authority for the final time. Alexios immediately faced the Normans under Robert Guiscard, who were repelled through warfare and diplomacy. He then targeted the Pechenegs, who were decisively defeated in 1091 with help from the Cumans, who were in turn defeated three years later. Finally, looking to recover Asia Minor from the Seljuks, he approached Pope Urban II for help c. 1095. He did not anticipate the scale of western Christendom's response—the First Crusade led to the recapture of western Anatolia, although Alexios soon fell out with its leaders. The rest of his reign was spent dealing with the Normans and Seljuks, establishing a new, loyal aristocracy to ensure stability, and carrying out fiscal and ecclesiastical reforms.

A mosaic depicting a haloed woman holding a baby, flanked by a man and woman, both crowned and haloed
A mosaic from the Hagia Sophia of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary and Jesus, flanked by John II Komnenos (left) and his wife Irene of Hungary (right), 12th century

Alexios' concentration of power in the hands of his Komnenos dynasty meant the most serious political threats came from within the imperial family—before his coronation, John II had to overcome his mother Irene and his sister Anna, and the primary threat during his reign was his brother Isaac. John campaigned annually and extensively—he fought the Pechenegs in 1122, the Hungarians in the late 1120s, and the Seljuks throughout his reign, notably waging large campaigns in Syria in his final years—but did not achieve large territorial gains. In 1138, John raised the imperial standard over the Crusader Principality of Antioch to intimidate the city into allying with the Byzantines, but chose not to attack, fearing that it would provoke western Christendom to respond.

Manuel I utilised his father's overflowing imperial treasury in pursuit of his ambitions and to secure the empire's position in an increasingly multilateral geopolitical landscape. Through a combination of diplomacy and bribery, he cultivated a ring of allies and clients around the empire: the Turks of the Sultanate of Rum, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Cilician Armenians, Balkan princes, Italian and Dalmatian cities, and most importantly Antioch and the Crusader States, marrying one of their princesses in 1161. Manuel averted the threat of war during the tumultuous passage of the Second Crusade through Byzantine territories in 1147, but the campaign's failure was blamed on the Byzantines by western contemporaries. He was less successful militarily: an invasion of Sicily was decisively defeated by King William I in 1156, leading to tensions with Frederick Barbarossa, the Holy Roman Emperor; two decades later, an invasion of Anatolia was resoundingly defeated at the Battle of Myriokephalon.

A painting of an army marching into a city gate with much smoke burning in the background
The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugène Delacroix (1840)

Manuel's death left the empire rudderless and it soon came under intense pressure. His son Alexios II was too young to rule, and his troubled regency was soon overthrown by an uncle, who was himself replaced by Isaac II in 1185. Centrifugal forces swirled at the borders as ambitious rulers seized their chance: Hungary and the Turks captured Byzantine territories, an exiled Komnenian prince seized Cyprus; and most injuriously, a revolt in 1185 caused the foundation of a resurrected Bulgarian state. Relations with the west deteriorated further after Constantinople allied with Saladin, the vanquisher of the Third Crusade, whose leaders also conflicted with Byzantium as they passed through its territory. In 1195, Isaac II was deposed by his brother Alexios III; this particular quarrel proved fatal.

The Fourth Crusade was originally intended to target Egypt, but amid strategic difficulties, Isaac II's son Alexios Angelos convinced the crusaders to restore his father to the throne in exchange for a huge tribute. They attacked Constantinople in 1203, reinstating Isaac II and his son to the throne. The new rulers grew swiftly unpopular and were deposed by Alexios V, which the crusaders used as a pretext to sack the city in April 1204, ransacking the wealth it had accumulated over nine centuries.

1204–1453

A map showing the competing states after the Fourth Crusade.
The partition of the empire following the Fourth Crusade, c. 1204.
Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty

Byzantine territories fragmented into competing political entities. The crusaders crowned Baldwin I as the ruler of a new Latin Empire in Constantinople; it soon suffered a crushing defeat against the Bulgarians in 1205. It also failed to expand west or east, where three Greek successor states had formed: the Empire of Nicaea and the Empire of Trebizond in Asia Minor, and the Despotate of Epirus on the Adriatic. The Venetians acquired many ports and islands, and the Principality of Achaea emerged in southern Greece. Trebizond lost the key port of Sinope in 1214 and thereafter was unable to affect matters away from the southeastern Black Sea. For a time, it seemed like Epirus was the one most likely to reclaim Constantinople from the Latins, and its ruler Theodore Doukas crowned himself emperor, but he suffered a critical defeat in 1230 and Epirote power waned.

Nicaea, ruled by the Laskarid dynasty and composed of a mixture of Byzantine refugees and native Greeks, blocked the Latins and the Seljuks of Rum from expanding east and west respectively. John III (r. 1221–1254) was a very capable emperor. His protectionist economic policies strongly encouraged Nicaean self-sufficiency, while he made many diplomatic treaties, especially after Mongol armies ravaged Bulgaria and defeated Rum between 1237 and 1243. This chaos was an opportunity for John, who fought numerous successful campaigns against the states which bore the brunt of the Mongol invasions. Soon after his death, his grandson was usurped by Michael VIII, founder of the Palaiologos dynasty, who recaptured Constantinople in 1261.

Michael chose to expand the empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople. The efforts of Andronikos II and later his grandson Andronikos III marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts to restore the glory of the empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II often backfired, like the time the Catalan Company ravaged the countryside, which increased public resentment towards Constantinople.

A painting of a siege of a city
The siege of Constantinople in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature

The situation became worse for Byzantium during the civil wars which erupted after Andronikos III died. A six-year-long civil war devastated the empire, allowing the Serbian ruler Stefan Dušan to overrun most of the empire's remaining territory and establish a Serbian Empire. In 1354, an earthquake at Gallipoli devastated the fort, allowing the Ottomans to conquer it and establish themselves in Europe, after originally being hired as mercenaries during the civil war by John VI Kantakouzenos. By the time the Byzantine civil wars ended, the Ottomans had defeated the Serbians and subjugated them as vassals. After the Battle of Kosovo, much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.

Constantinople at this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, Sultan Mehmed's army of 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city. Despite a desperate last-ditch defence of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces (c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign), Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans after a two-month siege on 29 May 1453. The final Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos, was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken.

Government

A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colors in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (green), Anatolic (brown), Bucellarians (orange) and Armeniacs (purple). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Samos, Crete and Cyprus.The themes, c. 750A map centred on Turkey. From west to east and north to south with the corresponding colors in brackets; are the themes of Opsikion (light purple), Samos (dark grey), Thracesians (light grey), Cibyrrhaeots (light green), Optimatoi (dark grey), Anatolic and Seleucia (brown), Bucellarians (orange), Paphlagonia (navy blue), Cappadocia (green), Charsianon (pink), Armeniacs (purple), Lycandus and Mesopotamia (brown), Sebastea (blue), Koloneia (dark green) and Chaldia (light blue). On the map are marked the major rivers; the Aegean, Black and Mediterranean Seas; the cities of Ephesos, Constantinople, Ancyra, Tarsus, Adana, Antioch and Edessa; and the islands of Crete and Cyprus.The themes, c. 950

Governance

See also: Roman emperor, Coronation of the Byzantine emperor, and Byzantine bureaucracy and aristocracy

The patriarch inaugurated emperors from 457 onwards, while the crowds of Constantinople proclaimed their support, thus legitimizing their rule. The senate originally had its own identity but later became a ceremonial extension of the emperor's court. The reign of Phocas (r. 602–610) was the first military coup after the third century, and he was one of 43 emperors violently removed from power. From Heraclius' accession in 610 till 1453, a total of nine dynasties ruled the Empire. During this time, for only 30 of the 843 years were the reigning emperors unrelated by blood or kinship, largely due to the practice of co-emperorship.

Diocletian and Constantine's reforms reorganized the Empire into Praetorian prefectures and separated the army from the civil administration. From the 7th century onward, these prefectures were reorganized into provinces and later divided into districts called themata, governed by military commanders known as strategos, who oversaw both civil and military matters. Before this change, cities were self-governing communities represented by central government and church officials, while emperors focused on defense and foreign relations. However, constant wars and raids by Arab forces drastically changed this structure. City councils declined, as did the local elites who supported them. Through his legal reforms, Leo VI (r. 886–912) centralised power, formally ending city councils' rights and the legislative authority of the senate.

Diplomacy

Main article: Byzantine diplomacy See also: Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire

Diplomacy is often regarded as one of the Empire's lasting contributions to European history, particularly in preserving civilization in Eastern Europe. This reputation stems from its aggressive treaty negotiations, alliances with the enemies of its adversaries, and strategic partnerships. For instance, the Empire supported the Turks against the Persians during the Perso-Turkic War (627–629) and exploited tensions between the Umayyads in Spain and the Aghlabids in Sicily. Diplomacy frequently involved long-term embassies, hosting foreign royals as political pawns, and deliberately displaying wealth and power to ensure such impressions spread widely. Other diplomatic strategies included political marriages, granting titles, bribery, persuasion, and intelligence gathering. Notably, the 'Bureau of Barbarians', established in the 4th century, is considered one of the earliest foreign intelligence agencies.

Manuscript illustration of an embassy travelling between two rulers
The embassy of John the Grammarian in 829, sent by emperor Theophilos to the Abbasid caliph Al-Ma'mun

Diplomacy after the reign of Theodosius I (r. 379–395) shifted significantly from the more conquest-focused policies of the Roman Republic, instead emphasizing peace as a strategic necessity. Even in the 6th century, when the Empire had greater resources and fewer threats, the enormous costs of defense, agricultural self-reliance, and aggressive neighbors made avoiding war a priority. Between the 4th and 8th centuries, diplomats capitalized on the Empire's reputation as the Orbis Romanus and its administrative sophistication to influence new settlements on former Roman territories. Byzantine diplomacy often drew fledgling states into dependency, creating a network of inter-state relations (the oikouménē) dominated by the Empire and leveraging Christianity to strengthen these ties. This network emphasized treaty-making, integrating new rulers into the "family of kings," and assimilating values, institutions, and attitudes. These practices have even been referred to as creating a "Byzantine Caliphate", where religion re-framed the civilised-versus-barbarian dichotomy in classical times. By contrast, diplomatic relations with Muslim states focused primarily on war-related issues, such as negotiating hostages or preventing hostilities.

A pencil sketch of a bearded, crowned horseman
A sketch by the Italian artist Pisanello of Emperor John VIII during his visit to Ferrara and Florence in 1438

Peace and survival, rather than conquest, were central objectives. Historians describe this approach as "defensive imperialism," which evolved between the 9th and 10th centuries to include halting and reversing Muslim advances, cultivating alliances with Armenians and Rus, and subjugating the Bulgarians. Diplomatic relations with Western states became more challenging after 752–753 and particularly during the Crusades, as shifts in the balance of power undermined the Empire's dominance and its use of the Limitrophe system. By the 11th century, the Empire adopted a principle of diplomatic equality, leveraging the emperor's personal presence to negotiate.

After recovering Constantinople in 1261, the Empire maintained its influence as a great power in the 13th and 14th centuries, despite its declining strength. This success is attributed to its efficient statecraft and strategic use of the Constantinople patriarch.

Law

Main article: Byzantine law

Roman law originated with the Twelve Tables and evolved primarily through the annual Praetorian Edict and the opinions of educated specialists known as Jurists. Hadrian (r. 117–138) made the Praetorian Edict permanent and established a rule where a legal point jurists unanimously agreed on became law. Over time, conflicting legal sources caused confusion about what the law should be. Efforts to address this included two private collections of imperial constitutions compiled during Diocletian's reign (284–305), the Gregorianus and the Hermogenianus (r. 284–305).

Theodosius II (r. 402–450) formalized Roman law by appointing five jurists as principal authorities and compiling legislation issued since Constantine’s reign into the Codex Theodosianus. This process culminated in the Corpus Juris Civilis under Justinian I (r. 527–565), who commissioned a complete standardization of imperial decrees since Hadrian’s time and resolved conflicting legal opinions. The result became the definitive legal authority. This body of law covered not only civil matters but also public law, including imperial power and administrative organization. After 534, Justinian issued the Novellae (New Laws) in Greek, which marked a transition from Roman to Byzantine law. Legal historian Bernard Stolte distinguishes Roman law as this because Western Europe inherited law through the Latin texts of the Corpus Juris Civilis only.

Zachary Chitwood argues that the Corpus Juris Civilis was largely inaccessible in Latin, particularly in the provinces. Following the 7th-century Islamic conquests, people began questioning the development and application of law, leading to stronger ties between law and Christianity. This context influenced Leo III (r. 717–741) to develop the Ecloga, which emphasized humanity. The Ecloga inspired practical legal texts like the Farmers' Law, Seamen's Law, and Soldiers' Law, which Chitwood suggests were used daily in the provinces as companions to the Corpus Juris Civilis. During the Macedonian dynasty, efforts to reform law began with the Procheiron and the Eisagoge, which aimed to replace the Ecloga due to its association with iconoclasm and to define the emperor's power under prevailing laws. Leo VI (r. 886–912) completed a complete codification of Roman law in Greek through the Basilika, a monumental work of 60 books that became the foundation of Byzantine law. Later, in 1345, Constantine Harmenopoulos compiled the Hexabiblos, a six-volume law book derived from various Byzantine legal sources.

Military

Army

Main articles: Eastern Roman army and Byzantine army

In the 5th century the East was fielding five armies of ~20,000 each in two army branches: stationary frontier units (limitanei) and mobile forces (comitatenses). The historian Anthony Kaldellis claims that the fiscally stretched Empire could only handle one major enemy at a time in the 6th century. The Islamic conquests between 634 and 642 led to significant changes, transforming the 4th-7th centuries field forces into provincial militia-like units which had a core of professional soldiers. The state shifted the burden of supporting the armies onto local populations and during Leo VI (r. 886–912) wove them into the tax system, where provinces evolved into military regions known as themata. Despite many challenges, the historian Warren Treadgold states that the field forces of the Eastern Empire between 284 and 602 were the best in the western world, while the historian Anthony Kaldellis believes that during the conquest period of the Macedonian dynasty (r. 867–1056), they were the best in the empire's history.

The military structure diversified to incorporate militia-like soldiers tied to regions, professional thematic forces (tourmai), and imperial units mostly based in Constantinople (tagmata). Foreign mercenaries also increasingly became employed, including the better-known tagma regiment, the Varangians, that guarded the emperor. The defence-orientated thematic militias were gradually replaced by more specialised offensive field armies, which could also counter the generals who rebelled against the emperor. When the Empire was expanding, the state began to commute thematic military service for cash payments: in the 10th century, there were 6,000 Varangians, another 3,000 foreign mercenaries and when including paid and unpaid citizen soldiers, the army on paper was 140,000 (an expeditionary force was 15,000 soldiers and field armies seldom were more than 40,000).

The thematic forces faded into insignificance—the government relying on the tagmata, mercenaries and allies instead—and which led to a neglect in defensive capability. Mercenary armies further fueled political divisions and civil wars that led to a collapse in the Empire's defence, and resulted in significant losses over territories such as Italy and the Anatolian heartland in the 11th century. Major military and fiscal reforms under the emperors of the Komnenian dynasty after 1081 re-established a modest-sized, adequately compensated and competent army. However, the costs were not sustainable and the structural weaknesses of the Komnenian approach—namely, the reliance on fiscal exemptions called pronoia—unraveled after the end of the reign of Manuel I (r. 1143–1180).

Navy

Main article: Byzantine Navy
Colour photograph of a manuscript illustration. To its top and bottom are Greek texts. The illustration shows 3 columns and 2 rows of ships attacking and sinking a similarly sized group.
Illustration from the Madrid Skylitzes showing the Byzantine fleet repelling the Rus' attack on Constantinople in 941.

The navy dominated the eastern Mediterranean and were active also on the Black Sea, the Sea of Marmara, and the Aegean. Imperial naval forces were restructured to challenge Arab naval dominance in the 7th century, and later ceded their own maritime dominance to the Venetians and Genoans in the 11th century. The navy's patrols, as well as the chains of watchtowers and fire signals that warned inhabitants of threats, created the coastal defense for the Empire and were the responsibility of three themes: Cibirriote, Aegean Sea, Samos and an imperial fleet that consisted of mercenaries like the Norsemen and Russians that later became Varangians.

A new type of war galley, the dromon, appeared early in the sixth century. A multi-purpose variant, the chelandia, appeared during the reign of Justinian II (r. 685–711) and could be used to transport cavalry. The galleys were oar-driven, designed for coastal navigation, and are estimated to be able to operate for up to four days at a time. They were equipped with apparatus to deliver Greek fire in the 670s, and when Basil I (r. 867–886) developed professional marines, this combination kept a check on Muslim raiding through piracy. The dromon was the most advanced galley on the Mediterranean, until the 10th century development of a dromon called a galeai, which superseded dromons after the development of a late 11th century Western (Southern Italian) variant.

Late era (1204–1453)

Main article: Byzantine army (Palaiologan era)

The rulers of the Empire of Nicaea that retook the capital and the Palaiologos that ruled until 1453, built on the Komnenian foundation initially with four types of military units—the Thelematarii (volunteer soldiers), Gasmouloi and the Southern Peloponnese Tzacones/Lakones (marines), and Proselontes/Prosalentai (oarsmen)—but similarly could not sustain funding a standing force, largely relying on mercenaries as soldiers and fiscal exemptions to pronoiars who provided a small force of mostly cavalry. The Fleet was disbanded in 1284 and attempts were made to build it back later but the Genoese sabotaged the effort. The historian John Haldon claims that over time, the distinction between field troops and garrison units eventually disappeared as resources were strained. The frequent civil wars further drained the Empire, now increasingly instigated by foreigners such as the Serbs and Turks to win concessions, and the emperors were dependent on mercenaries to keep control, all the while dealing with the impact of the Black Death. The strategy of employing mercenary Turks to fight civil wars was repeatedly used by emperors and always led to the same outcome: subordination to the Turks.

Society

Demography

Main article: Population of the Byzantine Empire See also: Armenians in the Byzantine Empire

As many as 27 million people lived in the Empire at its peak in 540, but fell to as low as 12 million by 800. Although plague and territorial losses to Arab Muslim invaders weakened the Empire, it eventually recovered and by the near end of the Macedonian dynasty in 1025, the population is estimated to have been as high as 18 million. A few decades after the recapture of Constantinople in 1282, the Empire's population was in the range of 3–5 million; by 1312, the number had dropped to 2 million. By the time the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, there were only 50,000 people in the city, which was one-tenth of its population in its prime.

Education

Further information: Byzantine university and Byzantine rhetoric

Education was voluntary and required financial means, so the most literate people were often those associated with the church. Primary education focused on teaching foundational subjects like reading, writing, and arithmetic whereas Secondary school focused on the trivium and quadrivium as their curriculum. The Imperial University of Constantinople was formed in 425, and refounded in 1046 as a centre for law.

Slavery

Further information: Slavery in the Byzantine Empire

During the third century, 10–15% of the population was enslaved (numbering around 3 million in the east). Youval Rotman calls the changes to slavery during this period "different degrees of unfreedom". Previous roles fulfilled by slaves became high-demand free market professions (like tutors), and the state encouraged the coloni, tenants bound to the land, as a new legal category between freemen and slaves. From 294, but not completely, the enslavement of children was forbidden; Honorius (r. 393–423) began freeing enslaved people who were prisoners of war, and from the 9th century onward, emperors freed the slaves of conquered people. Christianity as an institution had no direct impact, but by the 6th century it was a bishop's duty to ransom Christians, there were established limits on trading them, and state policies which prohibited the enslavement of Christians shaped Byzantine slave-holding from the 8th century onwards. However, slavery persisted due to a steady source of non-Christians, prices thus remained stable until 1300, when prices for adult slaves, particularly females, started rising.

Socio-economic

Agriculture was the main basis of taxation and the state sought to bind everyone to land for productivity. Most land holdings were small and medium-sized lots around villages, with family farms serving as the primary source of agriculture. The coloni, sometimes called proto-serfs, were free citizens, though historians still debate their exact status.

The Ekloge in 741 made marriage a Christian institution and no longer a private contract, where it evolved alongside the increased rights of slaves and the change in power relations. Marriage was considered an institution to sustain the population, transfer property rights, support the elderly of the family; and the Empress Theodora had additionally said that it was needed to restrict sexual hedonism. Women usually married between ages 15 and 20, and the average family had two children. Divorce could be done by mutual consent but was restricted over time, for example, only being allowed if a married person was joining a convent.

Inheritance rights were well developed, including for all women. The historian Anthony Kaldellis claims that these rights may have been what prevented the emergence of large properties and a hereditary nobility capable of intimidating the state. The prevalence of widows (estimated at 20%) meant that women often controlled family assets as heads of households and businesses, contributing to the rise of some empresses to power. Women played significant roles as taxpayers, landowners, and petitioners, often seeking to resolve property disputes in court.

Women

Further information: Women in the Byzantine Empire

Although women shared the same socio-economic status as men, they faced legal discrimination and had limitations in economic opportunities and vocations. Prohibited from serving as soldiers or holding political office, and restricted from serving as deaconesses in the Church from the 7th century onwards, women were mostly assigned household responsibilities that were "labour-intensive". They worked in professions, such as in the food and textile industry, as medical staff, in public baths, had a heavy presence in retail, and were practicing members of artisan guilds. They also worked in disreputable occupations: entertainers, tavern keepers, and prostitutes; a class where some saints and empresses allegedly originated from. Prostitution was widespread, and attempts were made to limit it, especially during Justinian's reign under the influence of Theodora. Women participated in public life, engaging in social events and protests. Women's rights were not better in comparable societies, Western Europe or America until the 19th century.

Language

Further information: Languages of the Roman Empire A photograph of two pages of a book written in a Greek script. The lower portions of both pages are damaged.A photograph of an illustrated manuscript written in Greek. At the left are two people who are standing talking to a person who is seated, while 5 soldiers listen. At the right are a group of soldiers going somewhere.Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language (Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo)
Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople (Vatican Library, Rome)

There was never an official language of the Empire, however, Latin and Greek were the main languages. During the early years of the Roman Empire, educated nobles often relied on their knowledge of Greek to meet societal expectations, and knowledge of Latin was useful for a career in the military, government, or law. In the east, Greek was the dominant language, a legacy of the Hellenistic period. Greek was also the language of the Christian Church and trade.

Most early emperors were bilingual but had a preference for Latin in the public sphere for political reasons, a practice that first started during the Punic Wars. Classical languages expert Bruno Rochette claims Latin had experienced a period of spread from the second century BC onwards, and especially so in the western provinces, but not as much in the eastern provinces with a change due to Diocletian's reforms: there was a decline in the knowledge of Greek in the west, and Latin was asserted as the language of power in the east.

A map showing Pontic Greek dialects in Northern Turkey, Demotic Greek dialects in the west, and Cappadocian Greek dialects in the south.
Distribution of Greek dialects in Anatolia in the late Byzantine Empire through to 1923. Demotic in light grey. Pontic in orange. Cappadocian in green. Green dots indicate Cappadocian Greek-speaking villages in 1910.

Despite this, Greek's influence gradually grew in the government, beginning when Arcadius in 397 AD allowed judges to issue decisions in Greek, Theodosius II in 439 expanded its use in legal procedures, the first law in Greek was issued in 448, and when Leo I legislated in the language in the 460s. Justinian I's Corpus Juris Civilis, a compilation of mostly Roman jurists, was written almost entirely in Latin; however, the laws issued after 534, from Justinian's Novellae Constitutiones onwards, were in both Greek and Latin, which marks the year when the government officially began to use the former language.

Historian Nikolaos Oikonomides states that Greek for a time became diglossic with the spoken language, known as Koine (later, Demotic Greek), used alongside an older written form (Attic Greek) until Koine won out as the spoken and written standard. Latin fragmented into the incipient Romance languages in the 8th century, following the collapse of the Western Empire after the Muslim invasions broke the connection between speakers. During the reign of Justinian (r. 527–565), Latin disappeared in the east, though it may have lingered in the military until Heraclius (r. 610–641). Historian Steven Runciman claims contact with Western Europe in the 10th century revived Latin studies, and by the 11th century, knowledge of Latin was no longer unusual in Constantinople.

Many other languages are attested in the Empire, not just in Constantinople but also at its frontiers. They include Syriac, Coptic, Slavonic, Armenian, Georgian, Illyrian, Thracian, and Celtic; these were typically the languages of the lower strata of the population and the illiterate, who were the vast majority. The Empire initially was a multi-lingual state, and although Greek bound everyone, there was a decline in the diversity of its peoples' languages over time.

Economy

Main article: Byzantine economy Further information: Byzantine silk and Sino-Roman relations

The Empire's geographic and maritime advantages reduced the costs of transporting goods and facilitated trade, making it a key driver of economic growth from antiquity and through the post-classical period. Infrastructure, including roads, public buildings, and the legal system, supported trade and other economic activities. Regions like Asia Minor, the Aegean islands, Egypt, the Levant, and Africa thrived as mature economic centres despite political challenges and military insecurities. From the mid-6th century onward, however, plagues, invasions, and wars caused populations and economies to decline significantly, leading to the collapse of the ancient economy. Major cities like Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, and Thessaloniki continued to support substantial populations exceeding 100,000, while the countryside transitioned into fortified settlements. These rural areas developed into hamlets and villages, reflecting an economic shift between historical periods toward more efficient land use.

Low population density prompted emperors to encourage migration and resettlement, stimulating agriculture and demographic growth. By the 9th century, the economy began to revive, marked by increased agricultural production and urban expansion. Advances in science, technical knowledge, and literacy gave the Empire a competitive edge over its neighbors. The 11th and 12th centuries saw the continued rapid population growth, marking the peak of this revival. Meanwhile, Italian merchants, particularly the Venetians, Genoese, and Pisans, took control of international trade, thus reducing the influence of native merchants. The political system grew increasingly extractive and authoritarian, contributing to the Empire's collapse in 1204.

The fall of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204 destroyed its wealth, led to the confiscation of large landholdings and the fragmentation of the Empire into smaller rump states, making governance inefficient and increasing the costs of doing business. The state gradually lost its control over trade practices, price regulations, the outflow of precious metals, and possibly even the minting of coins. Italian merchants further dominated trade as the events of 1204 opened the Black Sea to Western merchants, permanently altering the Empire's fortunes. Farmers and other economic agents increasingly produced goods for local use and were affected by the insecurity of constant warfare. Despite these challenges, the Empire's mixed economy — characterised by state interventions, public works, and market liberalisation — remained a model of medieval economic adaptability, even as it deteriorated under external pressures.

Daily life

Clothing

Main article: Byzantine dress

Historical evidence of Byzantine dress is scant. However, it is known that the court had a distinguishable dress, while non-elite men and women observed certain conventions of clothing. Fashion trends started in the provinces, and not in the capital, which was more conservative. The imperial dress was centred around the loros, tzangia and crown which represented the empire and the court. The loros derived from the trabea triumphalis, a ceremonial toga worn by consuls. It was more prominent in the early empire, indicating a continuation of the traditions of the Roman Empire. Historian Jennifer Ball claims that the chlamys cloak was like a modern-day business suit, which originated with the military, and was an evolution of the paludamentum cloak worn by aristocratic men including the emperor during the early empire. In the middle empire, dresses replaced the tunic for women. The late empire saw the larger influence on Byzantine dress of non-Greek cultures like the Italians (Genoese, Venetian), Turks (Ottomans) and Bulgarians.

Cuisine

Main article: Byzantine cuisine

Feasting was a major part of Byzantine culture and included the use of clean tables and forks. Modern Italian standards of gastronomy are likely to have been influenced by this era. Foods which are contemporary in the modern world are, among others, a cured meat called paston, baklava, Feta cheese, salt roe similar to the modern boutargue, black sea caviar, fermented fish sauce, tiropita, dolmades, and the soup trachanas. Fruits unknown from classical times which were added to Byzantine diets included aubergines (eggplants) and oranges. There were famed medieval sweet wines such as the Malvasia from Monemvasia, the Commandaria, and the eponymous Rumney wine that were drunk, as were millet beer (known as boza) and Retsina.

A visualised depiction of a board game
A game of τάβλι (tabula) played by the Byzantine emperor Zeno in 480 and recorded by Agathias in c. 530 because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red), as he threw 2, 5 and 6 and was forced to leave eight pieces alone.

Recreation

Chariot races were held since the early era till 1204, becoming one of the world's longest continuous sporting events. Mimes, the pantomime and some wild-animal shows were prominent until the 6th century. Because Christian bishops and pagan philosophers did not like these activities, the state's funding for them ceased, leading to their decline and a shift to private entertainment and sporting. A Persian version of Polo introduced by the Crusaders called Tzykanion was played by the nobility and urban aristocracy in major cities during the middle and late eras, along with the sport of jousting introduced from the West. Over time, game boards like tavli became increasingly popular.

Religion

Main article: Christianity as the Roman state religion Further information: History of Christianity, History of the Eastern Orthodox Church § Byzantine period, and History of the Jews in the Byzantine Empire

The granting of citizenship to all free Roman men in 212 fostered greater societal uniformity, particularly in religious practices. Christianity, bolstered by Constantine's support, began shaping all aspects of life. Subsequent emperors encouraged conversion and enacted laws in the late 4th century to restrict pagan activities. In 529, Justinian enforced conversions, specifically targeting polytheists. The confiscation of pagan treasures, diversion of funds, and legal discrimination led to the decline of paganism, resulting in events like the closure of schools of philosophy and the end of the Ancient Olympics. Christianity's debates increased the importance of Greek, making the emergent church dependent on branches of Hellenic thought such as Neoplatonism. Despite the transition, the historian Anthony Kaldellis views Christianity as "bringing no economic, social, or political changes to the state other than being more deeply integrated into it".

A map of Europe and North Africa where the maximum extent of the Roman Empire is shaded grey, differently colored dots mark places where Christian congregations were based
Map of the Roman empire with the distribution of the Christian congregations of the first three centuries displayed for each century

When the Roman state in the West politically collapsed, cultural differences began to divide the Christian churches of the East and West. Internal disputes within the Eastern churches led to the migration of monastic communities to Rome, exacerbating tensions between Rome and Constantinople. These disputes, particularly in Egypt and the eastern Mediterranean, eventually split the church into three branches: Chalcedonian, Monophysite (Coptic), and Nestorian. The Chalcedonian group maintained dominance within the Empire’s territories, while the Monophysite and Nestorian branches largely fell under Muslim rule following the rise of Islam in the 7th century.

Eastern patriarchs frequently sought the Papacy’s mediation in doctrinal and practical matters, but the pope’s authority was not universally acknowledged, even in nearby regions like Northern Italy. By 600, the Slavic settlement of the Balkans disrupted communication between Rome and Constantinople, further widening the divide. The Arab and Lombard invasions, and the increased Frankish presence, deepened this estrangement and intensified disputes over jurisdiction and authority between the two spiritual centres. Differences in ritual and theology, such as the use of unleavened bread and the Filioque clause, along with divergences in ecclesiology — plenitudo potestatis versus the authority of Ecumenical Councils — and issues of mutual respect, contributed to the separation of Western Christianity from Eastern Christianity. This separation began as early as 597 and culminated more definitively in 1054 during the East–West Schism.

In 1439, a proposed reunion between the Eastern and Western churches faced Eastern resistance, delaying its official publication in Constantinople until 1452. This agreement was overturned the following year by the Fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. The conquest of 1453 marked the destruction of the Church as the central institution of the Christian empire established by Constantine, isolating Greek-speaking Orthodoxy from the West and restricting its influence for nearly 150 years. Despite this, the Church survived in an altered form, and the spiritual and cultural influence of the Eastern Church, Constantinople, and Mount Athos the monastic peninsula has endured.

Arts

Art and architecture

Main articles: Byzantine art and Byzantine architecture Clockwise, from top left:

Subjects in Byzantine art were primarily Christian and typically non-naturalistic in their representation. Emerging from both the earliest Christian and Late Antique art, many early examples were lost amid the Roman Persecution; the fragmented mosaics of the 3rd-century Dura-Europos church are a unique exception. Such Byzantine mosaics, known for their gold ground style, became a hallmark of the empire, appearing with both secular and sacred themes in diverse places, including churches (Basilica of San Vitale), the circus (Hippodrome of Constantinople), and the Great Palace of Constantinople. The early 6th-century reign of Justinian I saw systemic developments: religious art came to dominate and once-popular public marble and bronze monumental sculpture fell out of favor due to pagan associations. Justinian commissioned the monumental Hagia Sophia church, influential elements of which became architectural hallmarks for the empire: the immense size, massive dome, innovative use of pendentives and highly decorative interior was imitated as far north as the Cathedral of Saint Sophia in Novgorod and the Saint Sophia Cathedral in Kyiv. The Hagia Sophia's creators, the engineer-architects Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles, are uniqely esteemed; most Byzantine artists were unrecorded and typically deemed of little importance.

Smaller-scale art flourished throughout the entire Byzantine period: costly ivory carvings—often as diptychs (Barberini ivory) or triptychs (Harbaville Triptych)—featured imperial commemorations or religious scenes and were particularly esteemed, as were metalwork and enamels. Other costly objects included illuminated manuscripts, which were lavishly illustrated for a wide range of texts, and silks, often including the prized imperial purple, both of which became highly popular in Western Europe. The rise of small, portable icon paintings, used for both public and private religious worship, grew increasingly controversial. During two periods of Byzantine Iconoclasm (726–843), possibly influenced by Islamic prohibitions on religious images, icons faced severe suppression and enormous amounts of figurative religious art was destroyed. Iconoclasts condemned their use, likening them to pagan idolatry and ascribing recent Umayyad defeats as divine retribution for their use, while iconophile supporters eventually prevailed, maintaining their essential use for veneration, considered distinct from worship, and found precedent in Gospel references.

Post-iconoclast Macedonian art (867–1056) saw a cultural Renaissance, from which an unprecedentedly vast amount of artworks survive. Subjects and styles became standardized, particularly cross-in-square churches, and already-existing frontality and symmetry evolved into a dominant artistic aesthetic, observable in the small Pala d'Oro enamel and the large mosaics of Hosios Loukas, Daphni, and Nea Moni monasteries. The subsequent Komnenos-Angelos periods (1081–1204) saw increased imperial patronage, alongside figurative artwork of increased emotional expression (Dead Christ and Mourners, c. 1164; see right). Byzantine artistic influence spread widely to Norman–Sicily (the Madrid Skylitzes) and Venice (mosaics of St Mark's Basilica). Serbian churches flourished in particular, as three successive schools of architectureRaška (1170–1282), Byzantine Serbia (1282–1355), and Morava (1355–1489)—combined a Romanesque aesthetic with increasingly voluminous decorations and domes. As smaller Palaeologan artworks (1261–1453) gained relic status in Western Europe—many looted in the 1204 Fourth Crusade—they greatly influenced Italo-Byzantine style of Cimabue, Duccio, and later Giotto, who is traditionally regarded by art historians as the inaugurator of Italian Renaissance painting.

Literature

Main article: Byzantine literature

Byzantine literature concerns all Greek literature from the Middle Ages. Although the Empire was linguistically diverse, the vast majority of extant texts are in medieval Greek, albeit in two diglossic variants: a scholarly form based on Attic Greek, and a vernacular based on Koine Greek. Most contemporary scholars consider all medieval Greek texts to be literature, but some offer varying constraints. The literature's early period (c. 330–650) was dominated by the competing cultures of Hellenism, Christianity and Paganism. The Greek Church Fathers—educated in an Ancient Greek rhetoric tradition—sought to synthesize these influences. Important early writers include John Chrysostom, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Procopius, all of whom aimed to reinvent older forms to fit the empire. Theological miracle stories were particularly innovative and popular; the Sayings of the Desert Fathers (Apophthegmata Patrum) were copied in practically every Byzantine monastery. During the Byzantine Dark Ages (c. 650–800), production of literature mostly stopped, although some important theologians were active, such as Maximus the Confessor, Germanus I of Constantinople and John of Damascus.

The subsequent cultural Macedonian Renaissance (c. 800–1000; the "Encyclopedism period") saw a renewed proliferation of literature and revived the earlier Hellenic-Christian synthesis. Works by Homer, Ancient Greek philosophers and tragedians were translated, while hagiography was heavily reorganized. After this early flowering of monastic literature, there was a dearth until Symeon the New Theologian in the late 10th-century. A new generation (c. 1000–1250), including Symeon, Michael Psellos and Theodore Prodromos, rejected the Encyclopedist emphasis on order, and were interested in individual-focused ideals variously concerning mysticism, authorial voice, heroism, humor and love. This included the Hellenistic-inspired Byzantine romance and Chivalric approaches in rhetoric, historiography and the influential epic Digenes Akritas. The empire's final centuries saw a renewal of hagiography and increased Western influence, leading to mass Greek to Latin translations. Authors such as Gemistos Plethon and Bessarion exemplified a new focus on human vices alongside the preservation of classical traditions, which greatly influenced the Italian Renaissance.

Music

Main article: Byzantine music Late 4th century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the organ, aulos, and lyre from a Byzantine villa in Maryamin, Syria. Late 4th century "Mosaic of the Musicians" playing the organ, aulos, and lyre from a Byzantine villa in Maryamin, Syria.

Byzantine music is eclectically descended from early Christian plainsong, Jewish music, and a variety of ancient music, although its exact connections to ancient Greek music remain uncertain. While it included both sacred and secular traditions, the latter is little known, whereas the former remains the central music of Eastern Orthodox liturgy into the 21st century. The empire's church music, known as Byzantine chant, was exclusively unaccompanied monodic vocal music, sung in Greek. From the 8th century onwards, chant melodies were governed by the Oktōēchos framework, a set of eight modesechos (ἦχος; lit. 'sound')—each of which provide predetermined motivic formulae for composition. These formulae were chosen for proper text stress and occasionally for text painting, then centonizationally collated into a variety of hymns or psalms.

Byzantine chant was central to the Byzantine Rite; however, the earliest music was not notated, including early monostrophic short hymns like the troparion. While proto-Ekphonetic notation (9th century onwards) marked simple recitation patterns, the neumatic Palaeo-Byzantine notation system emerged in the 10th century, while the Middle Byzantine "Round Notation" from mid-12th century onwards is the first fully diastematic scheme. Several major forms developed alongside well-known composers: the long kontakion (5th century onwards), popularised by Romanos the Melodist; the also-extensive kanōn (late 7th century onwards), developed by Andrew of Crete; and the shorter sticheron (at least 8th century onwards), championed by Kassia. By the Palaiologan period, the dominance of strict compositional rules lessened and John Koukouzeles led a new school which favoured a more ornamental "kalophonic" style that deeply informed post-empire Neo-Byzantine music.

Secular music, often state-sponsored, was ubiquitous in daily life and featured in a variety of ceremonies, festivals, and theatre. Secular vocal music was rarely notated, and extant manuscripts date much later, suggesting the tradition was passed through oral tradition and likely improvised. Prohibited for liturgical use, a wide variety of Byzantine instruments flourished in secular contexts, although notated instrumental music does not survive. It is uncertain to what extent instrumentalists improvised or if they doubled vocalists monophonically or heterphonically. Among the best known instruments are the hydraulic organ, used for both circus and imperial court events; the ancient Greek-descended aulos, a wind instrument; the tambouras, a plucked string instrument; and mostly popularly, the Byzantine lyra. Prominent genres included acclamation chants of laudation or salutation; the celebratory Acritic songs; symposia instrumental banquets, based on ancient symposiums; and dance music.

Science and medicine

Science

Main article: Byzantine science See also: List of Byzantine inventions, Byzantine philosophy, and List of Byzantine scholars
A photograph of the interior of a building built with blue arches and pillars and ornate yellow walls
Interior of the Hagia Sophia, the patriarchal basilica in Constantinople designed 537 by Isidore of Miletus, who was influenced by Archimedes' principles of solid geometry is evident.

Byzantine science played an important and crucial role in the transmission of classical knowledge to the Islamic world and Renaissance Italy. Many distinguished scholars held high offices in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

The manuscripts of classical antiquity were studied and preserved in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was, in every era, closely connected to ancient philosophy and metaphysics. In the field of engineering, Isidore of Miletus, the Greek mathematician and architect of the Hagia Sophia, produced the first compilation of Archimedes' works c. 530. It is through this manuscript tradition, sustained by the school of mathematics and engineering established c. 850 during the "Byzantine Renaissance" by Leo the Mathematician, that such works are known today, primarily through the school's production, the Archimedes Palimpsest.

Alexandrian philosopher John Philoponus was the first to question Aristotelian physics. Unlike Aristotle, who based his physics on verbal arguments, Philoponus relied on observations. Philoponus' criticism of the Aristotelian principles of physics was an inspiration for Galileo Galilei's refutation of Aristotelian physics during the Scientific Revolution many centuries later, as Galileo cites Philoponus substantially in his works.

Two pots surrounded by caltrops
Ceramic grenades that were filled with Greek fire, surrounded by caltrops, 10th–12th century, National Historical Museum, Athens, Greece

Greek fire, an incendiary weapon which could even burn on water, is attributed to the Byzantines. It played a crucial role in the empire's victory over the Umayyad Caliphate during the siege of Constantinople (717–718). The discovery is attributed to Callinicus of Heliopolis, who had fled to the city after the Arab conquest of Syria. However, it has also been argued that no single person invented Greek fire, and that it was instead "invented by the chemists in Constantinople who had inherited the discoveries of the Alexandrian chemical school...".

During the last century of the empire, astronomy and other mathematical sciences were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars. The Fall of Constantinople in 1453 fuelled the era later commonly known as the "Italian Renaissance". During this period, refugee Byzantine scholars were principally responsible for transmitting ancient Greek grammatical, literary, mathematical, and astronomical works to early Renaissance Italy, whether personally or through their written works. They also brought classical knowledge and texts on botany, medicine and zoology, as well as the works of Dioscorides and John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian physics.

Medicine

Main article: Byzantine medicine

The Byzantines pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and the possibility of a cure for the patients as a reflection of the ideals of Christian charity, rather than merely being a place to die. The historian David Bennett estimates that there were approximately 115 hospitals in Constantinople during the mid-ninth century.

Legacy

Main article: Legacy of the Roman Empire

Political aftermath

Main article: Succession to the Byzantine Empire
A map centered on Greece and Turkey in 1450 AD. The Byzantine Empire holds only Southern Greece and northwestern Turkey
The Eastern Mediterranean just before the Fall of Constantinople

By the time of the fall of Constantinople, the Byzantine Empire, already an empire in name only since the Fourth Crusade, had been reduced to three rump states: the Despotate of the Morea, the Empire of Trebizond and the Principality of Theodoro. The Morea was ruled by the brothers of Constantine XI, Thomas Palaiologos and Demetrios Palaiologos. The despotate continued as an independent state by paying an annual tribute to the Ottomans. Incompetent rule, failure to pay the annual tribute, and a revolt against the Ottomans finally led to Mehmed II's invasion of Morea in May 1460.

A few holdouts remained for some time. In the Morea, the island of Monemvasia came under the protection of Pope Pius II before the end of 1460. The Empire of Trebizond, which had split away from the Byzantine Empire just weeks before Constantinople was taken by the Crusaders in 1204, became the last remnant of and de facto successor state to the Byzantine Empire. Efforts by Emperor David to recruit European powers for an anti-Ottoman crusade provoked war between the Ottomans and Trebizond in the summer of 1461. After a month-long siege, David surrendered the city of Trebizond on 14 August 1461. Trebizond's Crimean principality, the Principality of Theodoro (part of the Perateia), lasted another 14 years, falling to the Ottomans in December 1475.

Mehmed II and his successors continued to consider themselves heirs to the Roman Empire. They considered that they had shifted their religious basis as Constantine had done before, and they continued to refer to their conquered Eastern Roman inhabitants (Orthodox Christians) as Rûm. This claim gradually faded away as the Ottoman Empire assumed a more Islamic political identity. Meanwhile, the Danubian Principalities, whose rulers also considered themselves the heirs of the Eastern Roman Emperors, harboured Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles.

After Constantine's death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by Ivan III, Grand Prince of Muscovy. He had married Andreas' sister, Sophia Palaiologina, whose grandson, Ivan IV, became the first tsar of Russia (tsar, or czar, meaning caesar, is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine emperors). Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the Russian Empire as the successive Third Rome was very much alive in Imperial Russia, but it lost state support after the Russian Revolution.

Cultural aftermath

See also: Succession of the Roman Empire and Greek scholars in the Renaissance
A photograph of statue, which depicts two bearded and hooded men, the one on the left is holding up a cross while the one on the right is holding up a book
Monument to St. Cyril and St. Methodius, Byzantine missionaries to the Slavs, on Mt. Radhošť in the Czech Republic
A painting which shows a Christian priest standing on a pier officiating the baptism of multiple people who are standing in a water body while other people watch on
The Baptism of Kievans, by the Russian painter Klavdiy Lebedev

The historian Averil Cameron notes how Byzantium has often been identified with absolutism, orthodox spirituality, orientalism and exoticism, while the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism" have been used as bywords for decadence, complex bureaucracy, and repression. Both Eastern and Western European authors have often perceived Byzantium as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas contrary to those of the West. Even in 19th-century Greece, the focus was mainly on the classical past, while Byzantine tradition was associated with negative connotations.

This traditional approach towards Byzantium has been partially or wholly disputed and revised by modern studies, which focus on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy. From the ninth to the twelfth centuries, Byzantine Christianity converted and helped establish multiple nations in what is now Eastern Europe. Cameron regards this as undeniable, and she and Obolensky both recognize the major role of Byzantium in shaping Orthodoxy, which in turn occupies a central position in the history, societies and culture of Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, Serbia and other countries. Its use of vernacular language, and the development of the first Slavic written script, increased education and literacy and influenced the direction of the spiritual, religious, and cultural development of the entire region. The Byzantines also preserved and copied classical manuscripts, and they are thus regarded as transmitters of classical knowledge, as important contributors to modern European civilization, and as precursors of both Renaissance humanism and Slavic-Orthodox culture. The Byzantine law codes form the basis of civil law traditions in much of Europe, Latin America, Ethiopia, other countries that follow common law, and possibly even Islamic countries.

As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it shielded Western Europe from the Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for some time, the Ottomans. From another perspective, since the 7th century, the evolution and constant reshaping of the Byzantine state was directly corelated to the progress of Islamic conquests. Following the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, Sultan Mehmed II took the title "Kaysar-i Rûm" (the Ottoman Turkish equivalent of Caesar of Rome), since he was determined to make the Ottoman Empire the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Medieval Greek: Ῥωμαῖοι, romanizedRhōmaîoi
  2. Leo VI was officially the son of Basil I, but a persistent rumour alleged that he had been fathered by Michael III, who had previously taken Leo's mother Eudokia Ingerina as his mistress. One of Leo's first acts was to rebury Michael III in Basil's mausoleum in the Church of the Holy Apostles complex, which exacerbated the rumours.
  3. The historian Sofie Remijsen says there are several reasons to conclude that the Olympic games continued after Theodosius I, as the traditionally known terminal year of 393 AD for the games is linked to his anti-pagan constitution. She argues that the games instead came to an end during the reign of Theodosius II, when a fire burned down the Temple of Olympian Zeus in Athens. The historian Anthony Kaldellis says there is a common misconception that the games were banned by an imperial decree. Kaldellis instead argues that the declining interest in chariot games, lack of funding (due to state policies) and hostility from zealots is what led to their end.
  4. Greek's importance grew larger, even though Hellenic culture had already influenced Roman identity immensely and the Greek language had been entrenched in the east since the Hellenistic era.
  5. Arianism, one of the first major controversies, shook the Empire until it was addressed by the Nicene Creed. Other controversies persisted, leading to schisms, such as debates on the fundamental definitions of Christ's nature at the Council of Chalcedon in 451.

Citations

  1. Kaldellis 2023, p. 2; Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, pp. 1–2; Cormack, Haldon & Jeffreys 2008, pp. 8–9.
  2. Kaldellis 2022, pp. 349–351; Cormack, Haldon & Jeffreys 2008, p. 4.
  3. Aschenbrenner & Ransohoff 2022a, p. 2.
  4. Kaldellis 2022, pp. 352–357.
  5. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 2–3; Cormack, Haldon & Jeffreys 2008, p. 4.
  6. Cameron 2002, pp. 190–191; Kaldellis 2015.
  7. Kaldellis 2023, p. 34; Shepard 2009, p. 22.
  8. Shepard 2009, p. 26.
  9. Greatrex 2008, p. 232.
  10. Greatrex 2008, p. 233; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 16–17; Treadgold 1997, pp. 4–7.
  11. Greatrex 2008, pp. 233–235; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 17–18; Treadgold 1997, pp. 14–18.
  12. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 20–21, 34; Treadgold 1997, pp. 39, 45, 85; Rotman 2022, p. 234–235; Greatrex 2008.
  13. Greatrex 2008, p. 335; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 16–20; Treadgold 1997, pp. 39–40.
  14. Greatrex 2008, pp. 335–337; Kaldellis 2023, chapter 2; Treadgold 1997, p. 40.
  15. Greatrex 2008, pp. 336–337; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 81–84; Treadgold 1997, pp. 31–33, 40–47.
  16. Greatrex 2008, pp. 337–338; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 92–99, 106–111; Treadgold 1997, pp. 52–62.
  17. Greatrex 2008, pp. 239–240; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 114–118, 121–123; Treadgold 1997, pp. 63–67.
  18. Greatrex 2008, p. 240; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 128–129; Treadgold 1997, p. 73.
  19. Greatrex 2008, p. 241; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 129–137; Treadgold 1997, pp. 74–75.
  20. Greatrex 2008, pp. 240–241; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 126–128; Treadgold 1997, pp. 71–74.
  21. Kaldellis 2023, p. 136.
  22. Greatrex 2008, p. 242; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 165–167; Treadgold 1997, pp. 87–90.
  23. Greatrex 2008, p. 242; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 172–178; Treadgold 1997, pp. 91–92, 96–99; Shepard 2009, p. 23.
  24. Greatrex 2008, pp. 242–243; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 193–196, 200; Treadgold 1997, pp. 94–95, 98.
  25. Greatrex 2008, pp. 243–244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 209, 214–215; Treadgold 1997, pp. 153, 158–159.
  26. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 243–246.
  27. Greatrex 2008, p. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 220–221; Treadgold 1997, pp. 162–164.
  28. Greatrex 2008, p. 244; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 223–226; Treadgold 1997, pp. 164–173.
  29. Haldon 2008a, p. 250; Louth 2009a, p. 106; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 257–258; Treadgold 1997, p. 174.
  30. Louth 2009a, pp. 108–109; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 269–271; Sarris 2002, p. 45; Treadgold 1997, pp. 178–180.
  31. Sarris 2002, pp. 43–45; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 271–274; Louth 2009a, pp. 114–119.
  32. Louth 2009a, pp. 111–114; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 274–277; Sarris 2002, p. 46.
  33. Sarris 2002, p. 46; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 279–283, 287–288, 305–307; Moorhead 2009, pp. 202–209.
  34. Kaldellis 2023, p. 297; Treadgold 1997, pp. 193–194; Haldon 2008a, pp. 252–253.
  35. Sarris 2002, p. 49; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 298–301.
  36. Treadgold 1997, pp. 196–207; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 298–299, 305–306; Moorhead 2009, pp. 207–208.
  37. Treadgold 1997, pp. 210–211, 214; Louth 2009a, pp. 117–118; Haldon 2008a, p. 253.
  38. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 318–319; Treadgold 1997, p. 217; Sarris 2002, p. 51.
  39. Sarris 2002, p. 51; Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Treadgold 1997, pp. 220–222.
  40. Louth 2009a, pp. 124–127; Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Sarris 2002, p. 51.
  41. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 336–338; Treadgold 1997, pp. 232–235; Haldon 2008a, p. 254.
  42. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 347–350; Haldon 2008a, p. 254; Louth 2009b, pp. 226–227; Treadgold 1997, p. 241.
  43. Haldon 2008a, pp. 254–255; Treadgold 1997, pp. 287–293; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 351–355.
  44. Sarris 2002, pp. 56–58; Haldon 2008a, p. 255; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 364–367, 369, 372; Louth 2009b, pp. 227–229; Treadgold 1997, pp. 397–400.
  45. Kaldellis 2023, p. 375; Haldon 2008a, p. 256; Louth 2009b, pp. 229–230.
  46. Kaldellis 2023, p. 387; Haldon 2008a, p. 256; Treadgold 2002, p. 129.
  47. Kaldellis 2023, p. 387.
  48. Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Kaldellis 2023, p. 387.
  49. Kaldellis 2023, p. 389; Louth 2009b, pp. 230–231.
  50. Treadgold 1997, pp. 315–316; Louth 2009b, pp. 239–240.
  51. Treadgold 1997, pp. 323–327; Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Louth 2009b, pp. 232–233.
  52. Kaldellis 2023, p. 403; Haldon 2008a, pp. 257–258; Treadgold 2002, pp. 134–135.
  53. Kaldellis 2023, p. 403; Treadgold 2002, p. 135.
  54. Treadgold 2002, pp. 136–138; Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 438–440.
  55. Treadgold 2002, pp. 137–138; Haldon 2008a, p. 257; Auzépy 2009, p. 265.
  56. Haldon 2008a, pp. 258–259; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 443, 451–452; Auzépy 2009, pp. 255–260.
  57. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 444–445; Auzépy 2009, pp. 275–276.
  58. Auzépy 2009, pp. 265–273; Kaegi 2009, pp. 385–385; Kaldellis 2023, p. 450.
  59. Haldon 2008a, p. 260; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 450–454; Treadgold 2002, pp. 140–141.
  60. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 443, 447–449, 454–459; Haldon 2008a, pp. 258–261; Auzépy 2009, pp. 253–254.
  61. Treadgold 2002, pp. 140–141; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 459–561; Auzépy 2009, pp. 284–287.
  62. Haldon 2008a, p. 261; Treadgold 2002, pp. 141–142; Magdalino 2002, p. 170.
  63. Haldon 2008a, p. 261; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 464–469.
  64. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 470–473; Magdalino 2002, pp. 169–171; Haldon 2008a, p. 261.
  65. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 473–474, 478–481.
  66. Holmes 2008, p. 265; Auzépy 2009, pp. 257, 259, 289; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 482–483, 485–491.
  67. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 491–495; Holmes 2008, p. 265; Auzépy 2009, pp. 273–274.
  68. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 498–501; Holmes 2008, p. 266.
  69. Holmes 2008, pp. 265–266; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 504–505; Auzépy 2009, p. 254; Tougher 2009, pp. 292–293, 296.
  70. Tougher 2009, pp. 292, 296; Holmes 2008, p. 266.
  71. Holmes 2008, p. 266; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 522–524; Treadgold 1997, pp. 455–458.
  72. Tougher 2009, p. 296; Kaldellis 2023, p. 526.
  73. Shepard 2009b, pp. 493, 496–498; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 429–433; Holmes 2008, p. 267.
  74. Holmes 2008, p. 267; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 534–535.
  75. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 537–539; Holmes 2008, p. 267; Shepard 2009b, p. 503.
  76. Shepard 2009b, p. 505; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 540–543; Holmes 2008, p. 267.
  77. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 543–544; Shepard 2009b, pp. 505–507.
  78. Shepard 2009b, pp. 508–509; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 546–552; Holmes 2008, p. 268.
  79. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 553–555; Holmes 2008, p. 268.
  80. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 563–573; Holmes 2008, p. 268–269; Magdalino 2002, p. 176.
  81. Holmes 2008, pp. 268.
  82. Shepard 2009b, pp. 522–526; Magdalino 2002, p. 202; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 573–578.
  83. Shepard 2009b, pp. 526, 531; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 578–579; Holmes 2008, p. 269.
  84. Holmes 2008, p. 269; Shepard 2009b, pp. 526–29; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 579–582.
  85. Shepard 2009b, p. 529; Holmes 2008, p. 271.
  86. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 584; Holmes 2008, pp. 270–271; Magdalino 2002, p. 180.
  87. Shepard 2009b, pp. 531–536; Holmes 2008, p. 271.
  88. Magdalino 2002, pp. 202–203; Holmes 2008, pp. 271–272; Angold 2009, pp. 587–588; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 588–589.
  89. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 590, 593; Magdalino 2002, pp. 181–182; Angold 2009, pp. 587–598.
  90. Kaldellis 2023, p. 602.
  91. Holmes 2008, pp. 272–273; Magdalino 2002, p. 182; Kaldellis 2023, p. 636.
  92. Holmes 2008, p. 273; Magdalino 2002, pp. 184–185, 189.
  93. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 629–637; Angold 2009, pp. 609–610.
  94. Holmes 2008, pp. 273–274; Angold 2009, p. 611.
  95. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 639–642; Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2002, p. 190.
  96. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 642–644; Holmes 2008, p. 275; Angold 2009, pp. 611–612.
  97. Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2002, p. 190; Angold 2009, p. 621–623.
  98. Holmes 2008, pp. 274–275; Angold 2009, pp. 612–613, 619–621, 623–625; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 645–647, 659–663.
  99. Holmes 2008, p. 274; Magdalino 2009, pp. 629–630.
  100. Holmes 2008, p. 275; Magdalino 2009, pp. 631–633; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 664–670.
  101. Kaldellis 2023, p. 669; Holmes 2008, p. 275.
  102. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 670, 676–677; Magdalino 2009, pp. 644–646.
  103. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 678, 683–688; Holmes 2008, pp. 275–276.
  104. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 679–681; Magdalino 2009, pp. 637–638.
  105. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 682–683; Magdalino 2002, p. 194; Magdalino 2009, pp. 638–641.
  106. Magdalino 2009, pp. 643–644; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 692–693.
  107. Kaldellis 2023, p. 695.
  108. Magdalino 2002, p. 194; Holmes 2008, p. 276.
  109. Holmes 2008, p. 276; Magdalino 2002, pp. 194–195; Magdalino 2009, p. 655.
  110. Magdalino 2002, pp. 195–196; Magdalino 2009, pp. 648–651; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 706–710.
  111. Holmes 2008, p. 276.
  112. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 718–720; Magdalino 2009, pp. 651–652.
  113. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 720–724; Magdalino 2009, pp. 652–653.
  114. ^ Laiou 2008, p. 280; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 733–734; Reinert 2002, pp. 250–253; Angold 2009b, p. 731.
  115. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 755–758; Angold 2009b, p. 737.
  116. Laiou 2008, p. 283; Reinert 2002, p. 254; Angold 2009b, pp. 737–738; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 766–770.
  117. Reinert 2002, p. 253; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 760–762.
  118. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 771; Laiou 2008, pp. 282–283.
  119. Angold 2009b, p. 740; Laiou 2008, pp. 282–283; Kaldellis 2023, p. 772.
  120. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 774–781; Reinert 2002, p. 254.
  121. Laiou 2008, p. 283; Reinert 2002, p. 254.
  122. Reinert 2002, p. 257.
  123. Reinert 2002, p. 261.
  124. Vasiliev 1964, pp. 617–619.
  125. Reinert 2002, p. 268; Vasiliev 1964, p. 622.
  126. Reinert 2002, p. 270.
  127. Runciman 1990, pp. 84–86.
  128. Runciman 1990, pp. 84–85.
  129. Hindley 2004, p. 300.
  130. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 35, 189, 222; Nicol 1988, p. 63; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 8.
  131. Kaldellis 2023, p. 35; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 8; Browning 1992, p. 98.
  132. Kaldellis 2023, p. 338; Treadgold 1997, p. 326; Nicol 1988, p. 64.
  133. Nicol 1988, p. 63.
  134. Louth 2005, pp. 306–308; Treadgold 1997, pp. 82–83.
  135. Louth 2005, p. 303; Treadgold 1997, pp. 430–431; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 418, 421.
  136. Browning 1992, p. 98; Kaldellis 2023, p. 185.
  137. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 397, 407–409, 536; Howard-Johnston 2024, p. 67; Browning 1992, p. 98.
  138. Obolensky 1994, p. 3.
  139. ^ Zhang 2023, p. 221.
  140. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 322–323, 325, 366–367, 511.
  141. Neumann 2006, pp. 4–5; Chrysos 1990, p. 35; Shepard 1990a, pp. 61–66.
  142. Haldon 1990, pp. 281–282; Shepard 1990a, pp. 65–67.
  143. Whitby 2008, pp. 122–123.
  144. Kaldellis 2023, p. 309; Whitby 2008, pp. 122–123, 125; Haldon 1990, p. 282-283.
  145. Chrysos 1990, pp. 25, 36; Haldon 1990, p. 289.
  146. Haldon 1990, p. 289; Chrysos 1990, pp. 25, 33, 35; Neumann 2006, pp. 4–5.
  147. Chrysos 1990, pp. 33, 35; Neumann 2006, pp. 4–5; Kaldellis 2023, p. 338.
  148. Chrysos 1990, pp. 33, 35; Zhang 2023, p. 221.
  149. Kazhdan 1990, p. 4; Kennedy 1990, pp. 134, 137, 143.
  150. Kazhdan 1990, pp. 7, 10; Kennedy 1990, p. 134; Chrysos 1990, pp. 28–29; Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 949; Haldon 1990, pp. 286, 949.
  151. Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 949.
  152. Kazhdan 1990, pp. 5, 11, 13, 20.
  153. Kazhdan 1990, pp. 20–21.
  154. Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 945; Oikonomides 1990, p. 74-77.
  155. Chitwood 2017, p. 16; Stein 1999, pp. 3–4, 8, 16; Longchamps de Berier 2014, pp. 217–218.
  156. Stein 1999, pp. 14, 16.
  157. Gregory 2010, p. 135; Kaldellis 2023, p. 168; Stein 1999, p. 27.
  158. Dingledy 2019, pp. 2–14; Kaiser 2015, p. 120.
  159. Kaldellis 2023, p. 168; Stein 1999, pp. 14, 16, 28; Kaiser 2015, p. 120.
  160. Gregory 2010, p. 135; Stein 1999, pp. 33–35; Dingledy 2019, pp. 2–14; Kaiser 2015, pp. 123–126.
  161. Stein 1999, p. 8; Merryman & Pérez-Perdomo 2007, p. 21.
  162. Stolte 2015, pp. 356, 370; Stolte 2018, pp. 231–232.
  163. Chitwood 2017, p. 23.
  164. Chitwood 2017, p. 185.
  165. Chitwood 2017, p. 185; Nicol 1988, p. 65.
  166. Chitwood 2017, pp. 23, 132, 364.
  167. Browning 1992, p. 97; Kaldellis 2023, p. 529; Chitwood 2017, pp. 25–32, 44.
  168. Browning 1992, pp. 97–98; Chitwood 2017, pp. 32–35; Kaldellis 2023, p. 529.
  169. Stein 1999, p. 35.
  170. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 59, 194; Haldon 2008b, p. 554; Treadgold 1997, p. 50.
  171. Kaldellis 2023, p. 331.
  172. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 454–455; Haldon 2008b, p. 555.
  173. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 421–422, 437; Haldon 2008b, pp. 555–556; Treadgold 1997, pp. 430–431; Neville 2004, p. 7.
  174. Kaldellis 2023, p. 562; Treadgold 1995, p. 206.
  175. Haldon 2008b, p. 555; Treadgold 1997, pp. 281, 432, 489.
  176. Haldon 2008b, p. 556; Blöndal 1979, pp. 17, 20–22, 178–179.
  177. Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463; Haldon 2008b, p. 556; Treadgold 1997, pp. 730–734, 737; Treadgold 1995, p. 29.
  178. Kaldellis 2021a, p. 463; Haldon 2008b, p. 555; Treadgold 1997, pp. 735–736.
  179. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Treadgold 1997, pp. 737, 794–796, 810.
  180. Kaldellis 2023, p. 634; Haldon 2008b, p. 557.
  181. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Treadgold 1997, pp. 825–826.
  182. Haldon 2008b, p. 557; Treadgold 1997, pp. 905–906.
  183. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 562, 656; Pryor 2008, p. 483.
  184. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 399, 442; Blöndal 1979, p. 29; Haldon 2008b, p. 555.
  185. Kaldellis 2023, p. 502; Blöndal 1979, pp. 16, 29–30; Haldon 2008b, p. 560.
  186. Pryor 2008, p. 487; Pryor 2017, p. 401; Markis 2002a, p. 92.
  187. MacGeorge 2002, p. 311.
  188. Pryor 2008, p. 488; Pryor 2017, p. 403; Markis 2002a, p. 93.
  189. Pryor 2008, p. 489.
  190. Howard-Johnston 2008b, p. 240.
  191. Kaldellis 2023, p. 489; Blöndal 1979, p. 29; Treadgold 1995, p. 33; Howard-Johnston 2008, p. 947.
  192. Pryor 2008, p. 489; Pryor 2017, pp. 404, 408.
  193. Haldon 2008b, p. 558; Treadgold 1997, pp. 975, 1084.
  194. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 812, 860–861; Treadgold 1997, pp. 989, 1024.
  195. Haldon 2008b, p. 558.
  196. Kaldellis 2023, p. 1881; Haldon 2008b, p. 559; Treadgold 1997, p. 1112.
  197. Kaldellis 2023, p. 896; Haldon 2008b, pp. 558–559.
  198. Treadgold 1997, pp. 197, 384–385; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 21–22; Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 310.
  199. Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 312; Treadgold 1997, pp. 931–932.
  200. Stathakopoulos 2008, p. 313; Treadgold 1997, p. 1112.
  201. Stathakopoulos 2008, pp. 310, 314; Stathakopoulos 2023, p. 31; Kaldellis 2023, p. 21.
  202. Markopoulos 2008, p. 786; Jeffreys 2008, p. 798.
  203. Markopoulos 2008, p. 789.
  204. Constantelos 1998, p. 19"The fifth century marked a definite turning point in Byzantine higher education. Theodosios ΙΙ founded in 425 a major university with 31 chairs for law, philosophy, medicine, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music, rhetoric and other subjects. Fifteen chairs were assigned to Latin and 16 to Greek. The university was reorganized by Michael III (842–867) and flourished down to the fourteenth century."
  205. Kazhdan & Wharton 1990, p. 122.
  206. Rosser 2011, p. xxx.
  207. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40; Rotman 2022, p. 32; Lavan 2016, pp. 16, 19.
  208. Rotman 2009, pp. 18, 179; Rotman 2022, p. 59.
  209. Kaldellis 2023, p. 39; Lenski 2021, pp. 473–474.
  210. Rotman 2009, pp. 30–31; Kaldellis 2023, p. 425; Rotman 2022, p. 42; Lenski 2021, p. 470; Rotman 2010.
  211. Kaldellis 2023, p. 140; Rotman 2009, Chapter 2; Rotman 2022, pp. 37–38, 53; Lenski 2021, pp. 461–462.
  212. Harper 2010, p. 237.
  213. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40; Rotman 2022, p. 53; Lenski 2021, pp. 467–468.
  214. Kaldellis 2023, p. 38; Brandes 2008, p. 563.
  215. Kaldellis 2023, p. 39; Harvey 2008, p. 329.
  216. Kaldellis 2023, p. 39; Harvey 2008, p. 331.
  217. Kaldellis 2023, p. 444; Rotman 2022, p. 85; Lenski 2021, pp. 464–465.
  218. Talbot 1997, p. 121; Kazhdan 1990a, p. 132.
  219. Rotman 2022, p. 83; Talbot 1997, p. 121; Kaldellis 2023, p. 41; Stathakopoulos 2008, pp. 309, 313.
  220. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 88, 321, 444, 529, 588, 769; Talbot 1997, pp. 119, 122, 128.
  221. Harris 2017, p. 13; Kaldellis 2023, p. 41; Garland 2006, p. xiv.
  222. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40.
  223. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 40, 592; Stephenson 2010, p. 66.
  224. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 40, 592; Talbot 1997, p. 129; Garland 2006, p. xvi.
  225. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40; Talbot 1997, pp. 118–119.
  226. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40; Talbot 1997, pp. 126–127; Karras 2004, pp. 309–314.
  227. Talbot 1997, pp. 130–131; Harris 2017, p. 133; Garland 2006, p. xiv; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 40–41.
  228. Talbot 1997, p. 131; Kazhdan 1990a, p. 136.
  229. Grosdidier de Matons 1967, pp. 23–25; Garland 1999, pp. 11–39.
  230. Kaldellis 2023, p. 40; Karras 2004, p. 310.
  231. Kaldellis 2023, p. 529; Harris 2017, p. 133.
  232. Rochette 2023, p. 285; Goldhill 2024, p. 850.
  233. Dickey 2023, p. 4.
  234. Rochette 2018, p. 108; Millar 2006, pp. 97–98; Treadgold 1997, p. 5–7.
  235. McDonnell 2006, p. 77; Millar 2006, pp. 97–98; Oikonomides 1999, pp. 12–13.
  236. Rochette 2023, pp. 263, 268; Rochette 2018, pp. 114–115, 118; Wallace-Hadrill 1998, pp. 80–83.
  237. Rochette 2011, pp. 560, 562–563; Rochette 2018, p. 109.
  238. Dawkins 1916.
  239. Kaldellis 2023, p. 191; Rochette 2023, p. 283; Rochette 2011, p. 562; Wickham 2009, p. 90.
  240. Kaldellis 2023, p. 289; Rochette 2011, p. 562; Rochette 2023, p. 283.
  241. Oikonomides 1999, pp. 12–13.
  242. Pei & Gaeng 1976, pp. 76–81.
  243. Sedlar 1994, pp. 403–440.
  244. Apostolides 1887, pp. 25–26; Rochette 2023, p. 283; Rance 2010, pp. 63–64.
  245. Runciman 1933, p. 232.
  246. Oikonomides 1999, p. 20; Harris 2014, p. 12.
  247. Beaton 1996, p. 10; Jones 1986, pp. 991–997; Versteegh 1977, p. 1; Harris 2014, p. 12.
  248. Kaldellis 2007, p. 95; Nicol 1993, pp. 1–2.
  249. Whittow 2009, p. 473; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 13.
  250. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 24.
  251. Whittow 2009, p. 467; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 246.
  252. Whittow 2009, pp. 472, 474, 479; Laiou 2002c, p. 698; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 24.
  253. Laiou 2002a, p. 177; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 25–26.
  254. Whittow 2009, p. 465, 471; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 25–26, 232.
  255. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 44–46.
  256. Whittow 2009, pp. 473–474; Laiou 2002a, pp. 269–270.
  257. Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 19–22, 24.
  258. Whittow 2009, p. 476; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 90–92.
  259. Whittow 2009, pp. 473–476; Laiou 2002a, pp. 25, 402.
  260. Laiou 2002a, p. 23; Laiou 2002b, p. 1164; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 233.
  261. Magdalino 2002b, p. 535; Kaldellis 2023, p. 739; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 167–168.
  262. Matschke 2002, pp. 805–806.
  263. Whittow 2009, p. 477; Matschke 2002, pp. 771–772; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 203.
  264. Matschke 2002, p. 779; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, p. 168.
  265. Whittow 2009, p. 471; Laiou & Morrisson 2007, pp. 232–235.
  266. Shepard 2009, p. 69; Ball 2005, p. 4; Dawson 2006, pp. 41, 43.
  267. Ball 2005, pp. 57, 75–76, 118–119.
  268. Ball 2005, pp. 35, 177.
  269. Ball 2005, pp. 12, 29.
  270. Ball 2005, pp. 24, 30, 32, 34; Dawson 2006, p. 43.
  271. Ball 2005, p. 9.
  272. Ball 2005, p. 6.
  273. Ash 1995, p. 244; Bryer 2008, p. 673-675; Decker 2008, p. 496.
  274. Ash 1995, p. 244; Davidson 2014, p. 123; Bryer 2008, p. 671; Faas 2005, p. 184-185; Vryonis 1971, p. 482; Salaman 1986, p. 184.
  275. "Medieval Sourcebook: Liutprand of Cremona: Report of his Mission to Constantinople". Internet History Sourcebooks Project, Fordham University. 17 October 2014. p. 47. Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 2 December 2024.
  276. Davidson 2014, p. 123.
  277. Bryer 2008, pp. 672–673; Unwin 2010, p. 185.
  278. Horn & Schädler 2019.
  279. Jeffreys 2008a, pp. 681–682; Kaldellis 2023, p. 13, 138.
  280. Jeffreys 2008a, p. 680.
  281. Jeffreys 2008a, pp. 678–683; Kaldellis 2023, p. 187, 233.
  282. Kazhdan 1991a, p. 2137, "Tzykanisterion"; Kazanaki-Lappa 2002, p. 643; Jeffreys 2008a, p. 683; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 672, 844.
  283. Jeffreys 2008a, p. 683.
  284. Spawforth 1993, p. 254; Kaldellis 2023, pp. 19–20, 60, 71.
  285. Ando 2011, p. 46. Reviewed with commentary in Kokkinia 2012.
  286. Papaconstantinou 2016, p. xxxii; Cameron 2016, p. 31; Cameron 2006b, pp. 544–551; Drake 2007, pp. 418, 422; Greatrex 2008, p. 236.
  287. Salzman 1993, p. 364; Drake 2007, pp. 412, 414, 425; Greatrex 2008, p. 236; Friell & Williams 2005, p. 121; Kaldellis 2023, p. 178; Treadgold 1997, pp. 72, 94.
  288. Greatrex 2008, p. 236; Kaldellis 2023, p. 138; Salzman 1993, p. 364; Drake 2007, p. 425.
  289. Remijsen 2015, pp. 47–49.
  290. Kaldellis 2023, p. 138.
  291. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 25, 67–68, 179, 181, 340; Treadgold 1997, pp. 71, 252–253.
  292. Wallace-Hadrill 1998, pp. 79–91; Goldhill 2024, pp. 847–848; Rochette 2018, p. 108; Millar 2006, pp. 97–98; Treadgold 1997, pp. 5–7.
  293. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 111, 180; Jones 1986, p. 991; Treadgold 1997, pp. 27–28, 175–176.
  294. Kaldellis 2023, pp. 141, 186, 342.
  295. Fousek et al 2018, p. 3/14, Fig. 1.
  296. Brown 1976, p. 8; Löhr 2007, p. 9.
  297. Kaldellis 2023, p. 390; Cameron 2017, A United Church, chapter 1.
  298. Berndt & Steinacher 2014, pp. 1–2, 8–19; Löhr 2007, p. 14.
  299. Sabo 2018, p. vi9; Löhr 2007, p. 14-23.
  300. Adams 2021, pp. 366; Micheau 2006, pp. 373, 375.
  301. Micheau 2006, pp. 373–374, 376.
  302. CasidayNorris 2007a, p. 3; Nicholson 1960, pp. 54, 60.
  303. Louth 2008, p. 47; Kolbaba 2008, pp. 214–215.
  304. Kolbaba 2008, pp. 213–215, 218–221.
  305. Meyendorff 1979, pp. 95, 97 101; Kolbaba 2008, p. 223.
  306. Brown 2008, p. 13; Kolbaba 2008, p. 223.
  307. Dowley 2018, p. 342.
  308. Dowley 2018, p. 342; Kitromilides 2006, p. 187.
  309. Kitromilides 2006, pp. 187, 191; Kenworthy 2008, p. 173.
  310. Kenworthy 2008, p. 173.
  311. Cormack 2018, p. 39.
  312. ^ James 2003, § para. 3.
  313. James 2003, § paras. 2 and 13.
  314. Rodley 1994, p. 2; Cormack 2018, pp. 11–12.
  315. Rodley 1994, pp. 12–14.
  316. Rodley 1994, p. 34; James 2003, § paras. 3–4.
  317. Rodley 1994, pp. 32–33, 56–57; Cormack 2018, p. 14.
  318. James 2003, § para. 10; Cormack 2018, pp. 33–40; Curl & Wilson 2021, § paras. 3 and 5.
  319. Rodley 1994, p. 67.
  320. James 2003, § para. 7.
  321. James 2003, § para. 4; Cormack 2018, p. 39.
  322. James 2003, § paras. 4–5.
  323. Rodley 1994, pp. 101–102; Cormack 2018, p. 2.
  324. Lowden 1997, pp. 147–148.
  325. Matthews & Platt 1997, p. 185.
  326. Rodley 1994, pp. 115–116; Lowden 1997, pp. 147–151.
  327. Rodley 1994, p. 132; Lowden 1997, pp. 187–188.
  328. James 2003, § para. 3; Cormack 2018, pp. 146–147.
  329. Curl & Wilson 2021, § para. 7.
  330. Rodley 1994, p. 166; Cormack 2018, pp. 159, 186; Andronikou 2022, pp. 2–4.
  331. ^ Browning 2022, § para. 1.
  332. Papaioannou 2021a, pp. 1–2, 5–7.
  333. Browning 1991a.
  334. Papaioannou 2021a, p. 10.
  335. Kazhdan 1999, p. 1; van Dieten 1980, pp. 101–105.
  336. Browning 2022, § paras. 1–2; Kaldellis 2021, pp. 162–163.
  337. ^ Kazhdan 1991b, p. 1236.
  338. Martín 2021, p. 685.
  339. Kazhdan 1991b, pp. 1236–1237.
  340. ^ Kazhdan 1991b, p. 1237.
  341. Ring 1994, p. 318.
  342. Velimirović 1990, pp. 28–29; Conomos 1991, pp. 1426.
  343. Conomos 1991, pp. 1424–1426; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, § Introduction.
  344. Velimirović 1990, pp. 26–27, 29.
  345. Velimirović 1990, pp. 45–46; Conomos 1991, p. 1425; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §5 "System of eight modes ('oktōēchos')", §7 "Formulaic chants".
  346. Velimirović 1990, p. 29; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §7 "Formulaic chants".
  347. Velimirović 1990, pp. 26–27.
  348. Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §10 "Syllabic hymn settings".
  349. Velimirović 1990; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §3 "Melodic notation".
  350. Conomos 1991, p. 1425; Levy & Troelsgård 2016, §3 "Melodic notation"; Mellas 2020, p. 2.
  351. Conomos 1991, pp. 1425–1426.
  352. Touliatos 2001, § Introduction.
  353. Touliatos 2001, § "Sources".
  354. Conomos & Kazhdan 1991, p. 1426.
  355. ^ Conomos & Kazhdan 1991, p. 1426; Touliatos 2001, §2 "Instruments and performing practice".
  356. Touliatos 2001, §3 "Genres and composers".
  357. Saliba 2006; Robins 1993, p. 8; Lazaris 2020, p. 17.
  358. Lazaris 2020, p. 194.
  359. ^ Tatakes & Moutafakis 2003, p. 189.
  360. Lazaris 2020, p. 3.
  361. Anastos 1962, p. 409.
  362. Lazaris 2020, p. 66.
  363. Jones 2005.
  364. Lindberg 1992, p. 162; Wildberg 2018.
  365. "Greek Fire | Weaponry". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 10 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  366. Lazaris 2020, p. 446.
  367. Partington 1999, p. 13.
  368. Robins 1993, p. 8.
  369. Lindberg 1992, p. 162.
  370. Lindberg 1992, p. 349; Nutton 1984, p. 9; Miller 1997, pp. ix, 3–4.
  371. Bennett 2016, p. 24.
  372. Nicol 1993, pp. 396, 401; Reinert 2002, p. 283.
  373. Kalligas 2002, pp. 886, 888.
  374. Nicol 1993, pp. 407–408.
  375. Üre 2020, p. 46.
  376. Clark 2000, p. 213.
  377. Seton-Watson 1967, p. 31.
  378. Cameron 2009, pp. 277–281.
  379. Shepard 2006, pp. 4–5, 7–8.
  380. Harris 2014, p. 7.
  381. Cameron 2009, pp. 186–277.
  382. Poppe 1991, p. 25.
  383. Ivanič 2016, p. 127.
  384. ^ Cameron 2009, p. 261.
  385. Stolte 2015, pp. 10–11; Merryman & Pérez-Perdomo 2007, pp. 367–368; Stein 1999, p. 36.
  386. Salogubova & Zenkov 2018.
  387. Bideleux & Jeffries 1998, p. 71; Béhar 1999, p. 38.

Sources

External links

Library resources about
Byzantine Empire
Byzantine Empire topics
History
Preceding
Early (330–717)
Middle (717–1204)
Late (1204–1453)
By modern region
or territory
Governance
Central
Early
Middle
Late
Provincial
Early
Middle
Late
Foreign relations
Military
Army
Early
Middle
Late
Navy
Religion and law
Religion
Law
Culture and society
Architecture
Constantinople
Thessalonica
Ravenna
Other locations
Art
Economy
Literature
Everyday life
Impact
Links to related articles
Empires
Ancient
(colonies)
Post-classical
Modern
Colonial
Lists
Miscellaneous
History of Anatolia
Modern EuropeEarly Modern EuropeCrusadesIslamic conquestByzantine EmpireAncient RomeHellenistic GreeceBabylonianIron AgeBronze AgeNeo-Hittite periodMiddle AgesTrebizond EmpireLazicaColchisTürkiyeOttoman EmpireEmpire of NicaeaTao-KlarjetiBagrationi dynastyBithyniaUrartuLuviansCiliciaRamadanidsSultanate of RümKingdom of IberiaLydiaMitanniNeo-HittitesAnatolian BeyliksMuslim conquestsGalatiaAssyriaAkkadian EmpireKaramanidsArtuqidsKingdom of PontusCariaKizzuwatnaDulkadiridsEshrefidsAyyubidsInalidsKingdom of CommageneIoniaAssuwaKadi Burhan al-DinEretnidsChobanids (beylik)DanishmendsAlexander the GreatKingdom of PergamonPhrygiaArzawaHattiansKara KoyunluIlkhanateMongolsSassanian EmpireSeleucidsLyciaAk KoyunluArmenian Kingdom of CiliciaBagratid ArmeniaKingdom of Armenia (antiquity)AchaemenidsTroy VIITroyDemocratic Republic of ArmeniaByzantine EmpireAsia ProvinceHellenistic periodMedesTuwanuwaHittite New KingdomHittite Old KingdomArgead dynastyRise of Nationalism under the Ottoman EmpireConstantinopleCimmerianTimuridsBattle of AnkaraBattle of ManzikertBattle of SyllaeumBattle of IssusBattle of PteriaBattle of KadeshFall of ConstantinopleList of archaeological periodsHistory of Anatolia
List of historic states of Italy
Pre-Roman period
Ancient Rome
Medieval
and
Early Modern
states
Barbarian kingdoms
(476–774)
Byzantine Empire (584–751)
Papal States
(754–1870)
Holy Roman Empire
and other
independent
states
Republic of Venice
(697–1797)
Other Republics
(c. 1000–1797)
Southern Italy
(774–1139)
Byzantine
Arab
Lombard
Norman
Sardinia
(from the 9th century)
Kingdom of Sicily
(1130–1816) and
Kingdom of Naples
(1282–1816)
French Revolutionary
and Napoleonic eras
(1792–1815)
Republics
Monarchies
Post-Napoleonic
states
Post-unification
Timeline of Mesopotamia
Northwestern Mesopotamia Northern Mesopotamia Southern Mesopotamia
c. 3500–2350 BCE Late Chalcolithic 4-5 / Early Jezirah 1-3 Uruk period / Jemdet Nasr period / Early Dynastic period
c. 2350–2200 BCE Akkadian Empire
c. 2200–2100 BCE Gutians
c. 2100–2000 BCE Third Dynasty of Ur
c. 2000–1800 BCE Mari and other Amorite city-states Old Assyrian period Isin/Larsa and other Amorite city-states
c. 1800–1600 BCE Old Hittite Kingdom Old Babylonian Empire (Southern Akkadians)
c. 1600–1400 BCE Mitanni (Hurrians) Karduniaš (Kassites)
c. 1400–1200 BCE Middle Hittite Kingdom Middle Assyria
c. 1200–1150 BCE Bronze Age Collapse ("Sea Peoples") Arameans
c. 1150–911 BCE Phoenicia Neo-Hittite
city-states
Aram-
Damascus
Arameans Middle Babylonia Chal-
de-
ans
911–729 BCE Neo-Assyrian Empire
729–609 BCE
626–539 BCE Neo-Babylonian Empire (Chaldeans)
539–331 BCE Achaemenid Empire
336–301 BCE Macedonian Empire (Ancient Greeks and Macedonians)
311–129 BCE Seleucid Empire
129–63 BCE Seleucid Empire Parthian Empire
63 BCE–224 CE Ancient Rome - Byzantine Empire (Syria)
224–mid 7C Sassanid Empire
Ancient Rome topics
History
Empire
Constitution
Law
Government
Magistrates
Ordinary
Extraordinary
Military
Economy
Culture
Society
Technology
Latin
Writers
Latin
Greek
Major cities
Lists and other
topics
History of Europe
Prehistory
Classical antiquity
Middle Ages
Modern period
See also
Portals:Byzantine Empire at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories:
Byzantine Empire: Difference between revisions Add topic