| Revision as of 08:07, 24 February 2010 editMaurreen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,724 edits Living Persons task force← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,312,091 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 41) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} | <!-- {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} --> | ||
| {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | {{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| {| class="{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}} messagebox" | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | {{#if:{{{header|}}}|rowspan="2"}} align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 90 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}} | |||
| <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | |||
| | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | |||
| |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. | ||
| |} | |} --> | ||
| {{bots|deny=SineBot,DPL bot}} | |||
| ] | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 41 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |algo = old(90d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| {{archives | |||
| | collapsed = yes | |||
| | bot = MiszaBot III | |||
| | age = 3 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{search archives | small=yes}} | |||
| == |
== The ICC Barnstar == | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| Howdy. I am curious why ] is tagged with <nowiki>{{blockedsock|Scalabrineformvp}}</nowiki> when ] it said the account was unrelated? I'm not trying to dispute anything, I'm just trying to learn.--] (]) 01:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| :Checkuser is not totally infallible. In this case, the account jumped into a middle of a contested dispute and began reverting. If that wasn't a sock (possible used from a home IP, or ], or something like that), then it certainly was a ], which for our purposes can be treated the same as a sockpuppet. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ::Cool. Thank you for the info.--] (]) 02:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit''' | |||
| Scalabrineformvp is still blocked as sockmaster, but the alleged socks have been unblocked. Are there other socks that account is blocked for? I'm a little confused because trying to get facts rather than opinions out of the related discussions is difficult. -] (]) 22:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| :{{done|Unblocked}} '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 22:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it. | |||
| == like minds on ] == | |||
| |} | |||
| We both ] the article in the same second. Well synchronized agreement, wouldn't you say? —] (]) 05:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Great minds think alike? <tt>;)</tt> | |||
| :Incidentally, are you sure it was in the same second? I've heard people say that before, but I have never figured out how they could get the accuracy down to more than a minute without using some sort of IRC monitoring feed. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 05:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::You actually did: | |||
| *2010-02-19T00:20:07 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs | block) protected 2010 Austin plane crash (indefinite) (Move warring) (hist | change) | |||
| *2010-02-19T00:20:07 EncMstr (talk | contribs | block) protected 2010 Austin plane crash (expires 05:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)) (current article name is descriptive and neutral) (hist | change) | |||
| ::(One of the options under "Preferences" -> "Date and time" enables you to see the seconds.) | |||
| ::But I came here to say thanks for fixing the mess I created by moving the redirect. There were lots of great minds there I think. :) ] 05:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nick Wolven == | |||
| Hi - sorry to bother you. Some time ago you userfied Nick Wolven for me, but it seems to have disappeared. I tried to find it under my contributions but I don't see it under there either - did all the material I added simply go away after a time period was passed? I put in a few more hours of work there and it seems to have just disappeared - is there any way to get it back? Thanks. ] (]) 05:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It still seems to be at ], though it was blanked by ] as you hadn't worked on it in some time. Do feel free to undo his edit, though please remove the AfD tag and any categories on the page. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 05:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually that was just a copy of it that I made when it got deleted. When you userfied it, I made a lot more changes - including his cover story in Asimov magazine in December, and a lot of reviews. I don't know what happened to the userfied version of the page you created - I forget the name, it was something / Nick Wolven. It's disappeared entirely from my contributions without a trace. ] (]) 07:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ah, that would be ]. It's restored now. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 14:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes that's it, thanks for your help. I see what happened now - for some reason someone deleted that page, and I don't think they merged the changes back to the deleted version of the article. I just noticed they notified me about it, so no big deal. Sorry to bother you about it! ] (]) 07:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == On images == | |||
| Hi NuclearWarfare, you were so kind to start an image review in October last year ], and Stifle weighed in, too. Would you please check the images of the present version ]? The last time things stalled over some ambiguity but I believe it's all clear now and won't take up much of your time. Thank you. ] (]) 13:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi NW, if you are too busy to check please tell me also, then I'll perhaps ask Stifle. Thank you. ] (]) 16:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops, sorry for not getting back to you. I am a bit busy at this time; could you please ask Stifle? Thanks. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 16:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Warning about canvassing == | |||
| <small>My original post to Okip's talk page was </small> | |||
| <small>I refactored Okip's topic header. This was the original one: </small> | |||
| <!-- | |||
| A Man In Black lost his adminship because he improperly blocked me for canvassing | |||
| : I believe that is false, so I am removing it for now. Someone who wasn't a party in the case is free to undo me. -- NW | |||
| --> | |||
| We both know the rules. We both know that contacting editors who are involved in an ongoing discussion is not canvassing, and is allowed. | |||
| To paraphrase what Fritzpoll posted on my talk page: | |||
| I believe your accusations against (me) are in violation of our ]. Specifically, the section which defines one form of personal attack as: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki. | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| If you would like, I would happily post the applicable guidelines. | |||
| Don't lecture editors about rules they didn't break. Since I did not break any rules, I would appreciate an apology from you. | |||
| ] 17:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't want to make a big deal about this but Okip and I have had enough conversations about this and many other topics and I would prefer that any posts he makes on my talk page not be used against him. He could have easily emailed me his concern. I appreciate your point of view but I really don't want to be used as evidence, thanks <font face="Century Gothic">](])</font> 17:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Okip, the issue with edits like are that they are not neutral and ask people to focus on one specific section of the RfC. By contacting several editors who you know share a similar point of view as you, you overwhelm a smaller discussion within the larger RfC. If you had asked a few editors "I posted some of my thoughts , would you care to take a look to make sure I didn't misrepresent anything?", that would be fine. But your post was targeted to more than a couple of editors and wasn't exactly neutral. But those are just my thoughts. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Help with verifying free images == | |||
| Hi, I noticed you're an admin on Misplaced Pages Commons and I'm looking for some advice as I've never uploaded images before. I found somebody willing to release his pictures under CC-BY-SA, which he published on an internet forum post (URL: http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-photos-multimedia/23233-go-thunder-go-4.html#post407806). I asked him to add the following text under his pictures: | |||
| :"I am releasing these images under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC-BY-SA)." | |||
| I've uploaded one of them to commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:JF-17_background_Mirage_5_ROSE_foreground.jpg) as a test, adding the above URL as the original source and as proof of permission. Can you see any problems that would cause it to be deleted? | |||
| Thanks for any help you can give. | |||
| --] (]) 17:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :That looks great! Thank you very much for uploading this. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 18:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::No problem, thanks again for checking it out. I'll tell the owner you liked it, he's an ex-Air Force guy who was happy to help me illustrate the ] jet fighter article I've been working on. He's got quite a few more good ones which I'll put up soon.--] (]) 18:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == jeremy irons == | |||
| why did you delete it??? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Thanks for catching this mistake. I was trying to purge an revision from the history, but apparently my script stopped midway and the article stayed deleted. Should be fixed now. Cheers, '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: thanks it was shocking :D (] (]) 21:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Hi NuclearWarfare, thanks for touching base with me. I always wondered if one of my welcomees would make it big. It looks like you've made a big difference here! Regards, ] (]) 04:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == American Enlightenment == | |||
| Thanks for nominating my article. It's the first one I've done. --] (]) 13:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| With pleasure. ] (]) 16:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Exactly why are you allowing the IP editor to effectively remove Baseball Bugs's contribution, as make clear is the intention.? -] (]) 02:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I see you've now corrected the error. Thanks. -] (]) 02:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| === ] === | |||
| You have protected it at the wrong version!! ] (]) 02:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :He did, but has now corrected it so as to revert you. Why do you think you have the right to remove other editor's posts? -] (]) 02:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Could be a first; an SPI of an SPI. ] (]) 02:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::It could be worth looking into. It appears to be the harassing troll(s) I call the "Jersey Boys", as it/they emanate from a New Jersey ISP. It/they turn up now and then when they're bored, and try to hassle me. They had best be careful, or I might have to ask my cousin Vito in Joizy to pay them a visit and "explain" a few things. >:) ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 02:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It wouldn't be the first sock socking on someone else's sock report. Seriously, I think some people are in it for the sheer ] of it all. - ] (]) 03:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: too much alliteration for my tired brain. ] (]) 03:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Filtered == | |||
| I have enabled a filter on your page due to attacks while you were gone. Please feel free to disable it at any time. Have a nice day! --] <small>(])</small> 04:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :And Ed17 has protected your talk page. <font face="Segoe Print">] <small>//</small> ] <small>//</small> ]</span> 04:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :For six hours. I know that NW likes to keep protections short. ;) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">] ] • ]</font> 04:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks very much guys. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Block of ] == | |||
| Hi there. You blocked ]. Is this a mistake? He vandalized once, and I gave him a warning, but don't you usually give about 4 or 5 warnings before blocking? When you blocked him, he wasn't even warned until ''after'' he was blocked. Was this a mistake? --] ] ] ] 01:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :To be honest, if someone is editing in bad faith (not test edits, but something clearly showing that they aren't here to edit productively), then they need to be shown the door immediately. I'm not going to bother wasting the time of volunteers reverting someone over and over again just so we can be ''absolutely sure'' that they aren't going to be productive. If they wish to reform, there is always the unblock template. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::But he wasn't even warned once, that was his first edit. --] ] ] ] 19:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Another SOCK bites the dust? == | |||
| Hi there NUKE, VASCO here, | |||
| I guess that, during your absence, vandals really went head over heels on your talk page and akin...Pityful, thank god you also had good people helping with those lowlifes. Regarding this situation (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Marvingroves/Archive), where you efficiently intervened, i think (i do not want to sound pedantic or anything, but i don't think, i AM SURE) the vandal has come up with another account, now called ] ("contributions" here http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Markvermeulen). | |||
| Why do i say this? Because at ], he inserted (falsely!!) this player has represented the ] internationally, a pattern in the vandal, inserting this kind of lie in footballers' articles. If you take 30 seconds to read this section in this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/Oleguer_Presas#Personal.2Fpolitical_writings), you will see all the more that it has been a vandalic "addition" by this "editor", a player as nationalistic in views (not an insult, just stating the facts) as Oleguer will only play for Catalonia, not Spain. However, if i was to be wrong in this approach, the vandal would still be WRONG, because OLEGUER (and dozens the "editor" has "contributed" in) has not, as of 23-02-2010, played for Spain in any soccer match. | |||
| Do you think something can be done about it? So sick and tired of PARARUBBAS and his siblings... | |||
| Cheers, ty in advance as always, have a great week, | |||
| VASCO - --] (]) 21:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi there Vasco. I wasn't too sure on this one, so I asked a . Hopefully, it shouldn't take too long.<p>And thank you very much for your comments :) '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 02:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Block immunity == | |||
| Thanks, NW, helps a lot] (]) 05:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Unblock request at ] == | |||
| Hi, just thought I would notify you that a user you blocked has filed an unblock request at ]. They were blocked as a sockpuppet after being identified as a potential sleeper account at SPI, but claim they may have been highlighted as this by editing from a company IP address. Thanks, hope this helps, --] (]) 09:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : I don't see any intersect in their editing patterns ... and a completely different style of personal interactions. Your call though NW. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 09:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *I'm not really going to be around till later, so feel free to use your judgment on this one, guys. Thanks, '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 12:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| **I went ahead and unblocked, as their editing pattern suggests they are unrelated, having made gnomish style edits over a long period of time. It seems plausible that as they suggested in their unblock request that they would have been linked in as a sleeper account due to a shared workplace IP. I will keep an eye anyway, I am sure that if there are any future problems they can be handled at the time, for now it seems best to assume good faith. Happy editing, --] (]) 12:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == G10 vs. PROD == | |||
| NW, when you're dealing with unsourced, negative BLPs (like a few I'm in the process of deleting), please either delete the G10-able statements and PROD what's left, or blank the page and use {{tl|csd-g10}} instead. There's no good reason for these correctly-identified BLP assertions to remain in the article for a week. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page if someone else declines a G10 like this and you don't think it's been appropriately handled. ] (]) 19:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey there Jclemens. Normally I'd agree with you, but ]. Perhaps we could continue the discussion on his talk page? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure, that works for me. ] (]) 01:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Wow, that was close! == | |||
| Hi there my friend NUKE, VASCO here, | |||
| This time i thought i was in for a period of detention, when i saw this message (http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:VascoAmaral&diff=cur#Response); were it true, it could only be attributed to my (sometimes) uncivil summaries. | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| But then, i had the idea of checking my talkpage's history and...VOILÁ!! A vandal, using the appropriate template and signing as YOU, did the "funny deed". He has been, with a (seemingly) neverending supply of IP, been on my case, reverting stuff just because, sending me stuff to my user/talk page, vandalizing, ever since (1 year!) i did what? Report him for vandalizing WP!! | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I do not wish (it's in your hands tough) for you to do anything (block, warn, etc), i just wanted to share this funny moment with you. Would not be (THE LEAST!!) surprised if he "visits" me today, especially if/when he sees i sent you this message (no one likes a smart ass, and VASCO AMARAL a smart ass being is...). | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| Take care, cheers, | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| VASCO - --] (]) 22:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == Filter == | |||
| ] | |||
| I have reactivated ] (again) due to attacks on you while you were gone. (I think you're not around, not sure.) Feel free to disable it when you get back. --] <small>(])</small> 22:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| Thanks for the head up, but what notability is claimed? ] (]) 00:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :The production of the ten-part series as well as a 15 year CEO-ship indicates that there ''might'' be some notability. Do you want to follow up on it, or shall I? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| ::His production company and his latest film are listed for deletion. Do you think they're notable, too? Note that the articles are created by a person who works for his production company. ] (]) 00:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| :::I'm not sure; I'm just saying there is a case to be made that they might be notable. Perhaps you could change the speedy deletion tags to ]? And who the article was created by has no merit to whether we should keep it or not in most circumstances. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :The film is an afd, there's no speedy delete criterion for films, but I hate prod with the passion of a million flames, as far as I'm concerned it's totally worthless, so I really don't want to go that way. ] (]) 00:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Sumbuddi == | |||
| == Edit request == | |||
| Hi NuclearWarfare <small>(hmm, didn't you intend to rename your account?)</small>,<br>blocked user Sumbuddi asked that you be made aware of the discussion on ]. Voilà.<br>Cheers, ] 00:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I will! I promise! <small>One day <tt>:(</tt> I feel really bad about it actually; I really should get on that</small> | |||
| :And thanks for the notice. I'll be sure to post there. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: :) ] 00:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/> | |||
| == Living Persons task force == | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code> | |||
| <br/>to<br/> | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code> | |||
| that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, here are a couple of things you or the task force might want to consider. | |||
| :Also, please make two other changes. The {{tag|center|o}} tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed {{tag|center|o}} tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after <code><nowiki>{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}</nowiki></code>, lease remove <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki></center></nowiki></code> and change <code><nowiki>|400px]]</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>|center|400px]]</nowiki></code>. Thank you for your cooperation. —] (]) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| 1. I'm working with a few people to make it easier for BLP subjects and non-editors to correct or otherwise address concerns about material WP publishes about them. Mainly, we want to make it easier for these people to find out who to contact. We're aware of a few related page and are drafting material to streamline one or more of those. | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| One thing we're considering is whether their main recourse (point of interaction) should be e-mailing OTRS, posting their concerns at a special page, or something else. That discussion is ] We invite wider discussion. | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| 2. It would be good to get research on BLPs, such as comparing unsourced with sourced, etc. Let me know if you'd like more thoughts or info. ] (]) 08:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 January 2025
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
The ICC Barnstar
|
The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit | |
| You deserve it. |
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sdkb 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>
that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, please make two other changes. The
<center>tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed<center>tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply<center>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}, lease remove<center>and</center>and change|400px]]to|center|400px]]. Thank you for your cooperation. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)