Misplaced Pages

User talk:NuclearWarfare: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:45, 26 February 2010 editNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 editsm Reverted edits by Boogiwiki (talk) to last version by NuclearWarfare← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,312,095 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 41) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} <!-- {{User:NuclearWarfare/Menu}} -->
{{talk header|noarchive=yes}} {{talk header|noarchive=yes}}
{{archives
{| class="{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}} messagebox"
| collapsed = yes
| {{#if:{{{header|}}}|rowspan="2"}} align="center" style="width:53px;"|]
| bot = MiszaBot III
| age = 90
}}
{{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}}
<!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox"
| align="center" style="width:53px;"|]
|align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why. |align="left"|<big>'''Wait!'''</big> Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why.
|} |} -->
{{bots|deny=SineBot,DPL bot}}
]
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 100K |maxarchivesize = 125K
|counter = 20 |counter = 41
|minthreadsleft = 0
|algo = old(3d)
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{clear}} {{clear}}
{{archives
| collapsed = yes
| bot = MiszaBot III
| age = 3
}}
{{search archives | small=yes}}


== The ICC Barnstar ==
== like minds on ] ==


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
We both ] the article in the same second. Well synchronized agreement, wouldn't you say? —] (]) 05:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
:Great minds think alike? <tt>;)</tt>
|rowspan="2" |
:Incidentally, are you sure it was in the same second? I've heard people say that before, but I have never figured out how they could get the accuracy down to more than a minute without using some sort of IRC monitoring feed. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 05:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit'''
::You actually did:
|-
*2010-02-19T00:20:07 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs | block) protected 2010 Austin plane crash (indefinite) ‎ (Move warring) (hist | change)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it.
*2010-02-19T00:20:07 EncMstr (talk | contribs | block) protected 2010 Austin plane crash (expires 05:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)) ‎ (current article name is descriptive and neutral) (hist | change)
|}
::(One of the options under "Preferences" -> "Date and time" enables you to see the seconds.)
::But I came here to say thanks for fixing the mess I created by moving the redirect. There were lots of great minds there I think. :) ] 05:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

== Filtered ==

I have enabled a filter on your page due to attacks while you were gone. Please feel free to disable it at any time. Have a nice day! --] <small>(])</small> 04:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
:And Ed17 has protected your talk page. <font face="Segoe Print">] <small>//</small> ] <small>//</small> ]</span> 04:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
:For six hours. I know that NW likes to keep protections short. ;) —<font face="Baskerville Old Face">]&nbsp;] • ]</font> 04:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks very much guys. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

== Block of ] ==

Hi there. You blocked ]. Is this a mistake? He vandalized once, and I gave him a warning, but don't you usually give about 4 or 5 warnings before blocking? When you blocked him, he wasn't even warned until ''after'' he was blocked. Was this a mistake? --] ] ] ] 01:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
:To be honest, if someone is editing in bad faith (not test edits, but something clearly showing that they aren't here to edit productively), then they need to be shown the door immediately. I'm not going to bother wasting the time of volunteers reverting someone over and over again just so we can be ''absolutely sure'' that they aren't going to be productive. If they wish to reform, there is always the unblock template. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 01:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
::But he wasn't even warned once, that was his first edit. --] ] ] ] 19:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== Another SOCK bites the dust? ==

Hi there NUKE, VASCO here,

I guess that, during your absence, vandals really went head over heels on your talk page and akin...Pityful, thank god you also had good people helping with those lowlifes. Regarding this situation (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Marvingroves/Archive), where you efficiently intervened, i think (i do not want to sound pedantic or anything, but i don't think, i AM SURE) the vandal has come up with another account, now called ] ("contributions" here http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Markvermeulen).

Why do i say this? Because at ], he inserted (falsely!!) this player has represented the ] internationally, a pattern in the vandal, inserting this kind of lie in footballers' articles. If you take 30 seconds to read this section in this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/Oleguer_Presas#Personal.2Fpolitical_writings), you will see all the more that it has been a vandalic "addition" by this "editor", a player as nationalistic in views (not an insult, just stating the facts) as Oleguer will only play for Catalonia, not Spain. However, if i was to be wrong in this approach, the vandal would still be WRONG, because OLEGUER (and dozens the "editor" has "contributed" in) has not, as of 23-02-2010, played for Spain in any soccer match.

Do you think something can be done about it? So sick and tired of PARARUBBAS and his siblings...

Cheers, ty in advance as always, have a great week,

VASCO - --] (]) 21:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
:Hi there Vasco. I wasn't too sure on this one, so I asked a . Hopefully, it shouldn't take too long.<p>And thank you very much for your comments :) '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 02:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== Block immunity ==

Thanks, NW, helps a lot] (]) 05:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== Unblock request at ] ==

Hi, just thought I would notify you that a user you blocked has filed an unblock request at ]. They were blocked as a sockpuppet after being identified as a potential sleeper account at SPI, but claim they may have been highlighted as this by editing from a company IP address. Thanks, hope this helps, --] (]) 09:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
: I don't see any intersect in their editing patterns ... and a completely different style of personal interactions. Your call though NW. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''</span>]) 09:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

*I'm not really going to be around till later, so feel free to use your judgment on this one, guys. Thanks, '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 12:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
**I went ahead and unblocked, as their editing pattern suggests they are unrelated, having made gnomish style edits over a long period of time. It seems plausible that as they suggested in their unblock request that they would have been linked in as a sleeper account due to a shared workplace IP. I will keep an eye anyway, I am sure that if there are any future problems they can be handled at the time, for now it seems best to assume good faith. Happy editing, --] (]) 12:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== G10 vs. PROD ==

NW, when you're dealing with unsourced, negative BLPs (like a few I'm in the process of deleting), please either delete the G10-able statements and PROD what's left, or blank the page and use {{tl|csd-g10}} instead. There's no good reason for these correctly-identified BLP assertions to remain in the article for a week. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page if someone else declines a G10 like this and you don't think it's been appropriately handled. ] (]) 19:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
:Hey there Jclemens. Normally I'd agree with you, but ]. Perhaps we could continue the discussion on his talk page? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
::Sure, that works for me. ] (]) 01:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== Wow, that was close! ==

Hi there my friend NUKE, VASCO here,

This time i thought i was in for a period of detention, when i saw this message (http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:VascoAmaral&diff=cur#Response); were it true, it could only be attributed to my (sometimes) uncivil summaries.

But then, i had the idea of checking my talkpage's history and...VOILÁ!! A vandal, using the appropriate template and signing as YOU, did the "funny deed". He has been, with a (seemingly) neverending supply of IP, been on my case, reverting stuff just because, sending me stuff to my user/talk page, vandalizing, ever since (1 year!) i did what? Report him for vandalizing WP!!

I do not wish (it's in your hands tough) for you to do anything (block, warn, etc), i just wanted to share this funny moment with you. Would not be (THE LEAST!!) surprised if he "visits" me today, especially if/when he sees i sent you this message (no one likes a smart ass, and VASCO AMARAL a smart ass being is...).

Take care, cheers,

VASCO - --] (]) 22:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== Filter ==

I have reactivated ] (again) due to attacks on you while you were gone. (I think you're not around, not sure.) Feel free to disable it when you get back. --] <small>(])</small> 22:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Thanks for the head up, but what notability is claimed? ] (]) 00:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:The production of the ten-part series as well as a 15 year CEO-ship indicates that there ''might'' be some notability. Do you want to follow up on it, or shall I? '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
::His production company and his latest film are listed for deletion. Do you think they're notable, too? Note that the articles are created by a person who works for his production company. ] (]) 00:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure; I'm just saying there is a case to be made that they might be notable. Perhaps you could change the speedy deletion tags to ]? And who the article was created by has no merit to whether we should keep it or not in most circumstances. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

:The film is an afd, there's no speedy delete criterion for films, but I hate prod with the passion of a million flames, as far as I'm concerned it's totally worthless, so I really don't want to go that way. ] (]) 00:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== Sumbuddi ==

Hi NuclearWarfare <small>(hmm, didn't you intend to rename your account?)</small>,<br>blocked user Sumbuddi asked that you be made aware of the discussion on ]. Voilà.<br>Cheers, ] 00:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:I will! I promise! <small>One day <tt>:(</tt> I feel really bad about it actually; I really should get on that</small>
:And thanks for the notice. I'll be sure to post there. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 00:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:: :) ] 00:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== Living Persons task force ==

Hi, here are a couple of things you or the task force might want to consider.

1. I'm working with a few people to make it easier for BLP subjects and non-editors to correct or otherwise address concerns about material WP publishes about them. Mainly, we want to make it easier for these people to find out who to contact. We're aware of a few related page and are drafting material to streamline one or more of those.

One thing we're considering is whether their main recourse (point of interaction) should be e-mailing OTRS, posting their concerns at a special page, or something else. That discussion is ] We invite wider discussion.

2. It would be good to get research on BLPs, such as comparing unsourced with sourced, etc. Let me know if you'd like more thoughts or info. ] (]) 08:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you very much for these ideas. I'll be sure to look into these in greater detail later today. :) '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 12:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

:Your post on making it easier for subjects to get help is something that seems to be a great idea. Do you happen to have any ] that the task force could use as recommendations?<p>As for statistics: Any would be very well welcomed. You would probably want to talk to ] about that though. I think he's handling the statistics end of things. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== 89.195.18.43 ==

That was funny. You, Nihonjoe and I tripped over each other trying to revert his vandalism. You wanna double check and make sure we didn't overwrite someone's commentary? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 20:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:That was indeed amusing. I ''think'' everything got cleaned up properly; if not, I say we blame Nihonjoe <tt>;)</tt> '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
== Can you relist these debates too ==


Hello,
These need relisting ],],],] and for future reference how do relisting because I can't seem to do step 3 I can never find where to put it. ] (]) 20:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:Someone will get to them eventually. As for relisting AfDs, there is no real reason for you to need to be able to do it. I use a script, but it is something that probably should be left up to the reviewing administrator. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
== BjörnBergman ==


Take the survey ''''''.
Hey there.


Kind Regards,
I understand that you were concerned about how Björn seemed not to understand advice to provide sources for the BLPs he was creating and giving him a serious warning was probably appropriate. However, I'd recommend to go easy on the block threats in cases like this. It was pretty obvious that Björn was a newcomer acting in good faith and he was certainly not adding dangerously speculative, slanderous or damaging information.


]
Björn has had a really bad experience on Swedish Misplaced Pages which was to a large extent caused by his being rather young, inexperienced with these things and not terribly patient. But I'm trying to coach him as best I can. Hopefully he will learn from the advice provided to him and continue to make useful contributions.


] <sup>]</sup> 22:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC) <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
:Thanks for the heads up Peter. I left a note on his talk page. Please let me know if there is anything further I can do to help. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 22:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== A request ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, Nuclear, and thanks for blocking that user. If you could take a look over at ], I would appreciate it - you can find the full story of the account there, which I believe is one of many sockpuppets. - ] (]) 04:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:{{done|Indef blocked them both}}, though you may want to get a checkuser to take a look at who that is. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 04:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks for your quick response. I'll let the matter stay for now - hopefully, whoever is doing this has learned his/her lesson. If it pops back up, should I refer to the list of checkusers? - ] (]) 04:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Yep; that sounds like a plan. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 04:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


== Edit request ==
== ] ==


Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/>
FYI, you contested the PROD on this one and suggested I take it to AfD, and I've finally ]. Regards— ]''' (]) 06:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
<code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code>
<br/>to<br/>
<code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code>


that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] ==


:Also, please make two other changes. The {{tag|center|o}} tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed {{tag|center|o}} tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after <code><nowiki>{{Babel|en-5|es-1}}</nowiki></code>, lease remove <code><nowiki><center></nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki></center></nowiki></code> and change <code><nowiki>|400px]]</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>|center|400px]]</nowiki></code>. Thank you for your cooperation. —] (]) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Just to inform you, I have modified the block setting for ] to indefinate due to additional problems. My rationale can be found here: ]. As a summary, in addition to the impersonation/sock-puppetry you blocked them for, they have engaged in rather troubling personal attacks/attack pages, which has lead me to believe they are not here to help build an encyclopedia. There is a thread at ANI that is also relevant: ].


== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder ==
Hope this helps, just thought I would inform you of the circumstances, feel free to give me a poke if you think indef is too long. --] (]) 14:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;] 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
==User talk:Jéské Couriano==
See the top of the page, "]. --]] 00:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
:never mind, you already reverted yourself, ignore this--]] 00:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 January 2025

This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39
Archive 40Archive 41

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Archiving icon

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41

The ICC Barnstar

The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit
You deserve it.

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sdkb  05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Edit request

Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>

that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Also, please make two other changes. The <center> tag is obsolete HTML, and you have an unclosed <center> tag that actually doesn't do anything, so please remove the 4th line, which is simply <center>. Also, the centering of the image can be simplified and brought up to current standards. In the line right after {{Babel|en-5|es-1}}, lease remove <center> and </center> and change |400px]] to |center|400px]]. Thank you for your cooperation. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

Information iconThis is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

User talk:NuclearWarfare: Difference between revisions Add topic