| Revision as of 02:04, 17 June 2007 editKPH2293 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,051 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 72.191.159.64 to last revision by MartinBot. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:04, 17 June 2007 edit undoTomasBat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,238 edits Reverted vandalism by 72.191.159.64 to version 138672565 by MartinBotNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!! | |||
| {{otheruse|this=the airliner manufacturer|use1=the 1930s aircraft known as the '''Airbus'''|page1=Bellanca Aircruiser}} | |||
| {{Infobox_Company | | |||
| | company_name = Airbus S.A.S. | |||
| | company_logo = ] | |||
| | company_type = ] | |||
| | company_slogan = "Setting the standards" | |||
| | foundation = 1970 (Airbus Industrie) <br> 2001 (Airbus S.A.S.) | |||
| | location_city = Toulouse | |||
| | location_country = France | |||
| | key_people = ], ] <br> ], ] <br>], Sales Director <br> ], COO | |||
| | num_employees = 55,000-57,000 <ref>http://www.airbus.com/en/corporate/ethics/diversity/</ref> | |||
| | industry = ] | |||
| | products = ] (]) | |||
| | revenue = {{profit}} ]23,500 million (2005) | |||
| | net_income = | |||
| | operating_income = | |||
| | parent = ] | |||
| | subsid = | |||
| | alliance = | |||
| | homepage = | |||
| }} | |||
| '''Airbus ]''' is the ] subsidiary of ], a pan-European aerospace concern. Based at ], ] with significant operations in other European states, Airbus produces around half of the world's jet ]s, with most of the rest built by rival ], though the precise share varies on an annual basis. | |||
| ==Overview== | |||
| Airbus was incorporated in 2001 under French law as a simplified joint stock company or ''S.A.S.'' (''Société par Actions Simplifiée''). Airbus was formerly known as ''Airbus Industrie.'' The name is pronounced {{IPA|/ˈɛəbʌs/}} in ], ]] in ], and {{IPA|/ˈɛːɐbʊs/}} in ]. | |||
| Airbus was jointly held by EADS (80%) and ] (20%), Europe's two largest defence contractors. BAE Systems announced its intention to sell its 20% share of Airbus in April 2006 and exercised its ] in June 2006 to force EADS to buy the stake. The put option appointed investment bank ] to establish an independent valuation. Rothschild's valuation, reported in 2006, was £1.9 billion (€2.75 billion), well below the expectations of BAE and EADS. Unhappy with the valuation, BAE appointed independent auditors to investigate the value of its 20% share. <ref> ''""'' CNN.com July 5, 2006 </ref> On 6 September 2006 the BAE board announced it would recommend to shareholders to sell its share for €2.75bn (£1.87bn or $3.53bn). <ref>{{cite news | title = BAE agrees to £1.87bn Airbus sale | publisher = BBC News | date = 2006-09-06 | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5321626.stm | accessdate =2006-09-06}}</ref> | |||
| Airbus employs around 57,000 people at sixteen sites in four European countries: ], ], the ], and ]. Final assembly production occurs at ] (France) and ] (Germany). Airbus also has three subsidiaries in the ], ] and ]. | |||
| ==History== | |||
| ] at ], 2006.]] | |||
| ''Airbus Industrie'' began as a ] of ] aviation firms to compete with ] companies such as ], ], and ]. In the 1960s European aircraft manufacturers competed with each other as much as the American giants. In the mid-1960s tentative negotiations commenced regarding a European collaborative approach. | |||
| In September 1967 the German, French and British governments signed a Memorandum of understanding. In the months following this agreement both the French and British governments expressed doubts about the aircraft. Another problem was the requirement for a new engine (to be developed by ], the RB207). In December 1968 the French and British partner companies, ] and ] proposed a revised configuration, the 250 seat Airbus A250. Renamed the A300B the aircraft would not require new engines, reducing development costs. | |||
| In 1969 the British government shocked its partners by withdrawing from the project. Given the participation by Hawker Siddeley up to that point, France and Germany were reluctant to take over their wing design. Thus the British company was allowed to continue as a major subcontractor. In 1978 Britain rejoined the consortium when ] (the merged Hawker Siddeley and BAC) purchased again a 20% share of the company. | |||
| ===Formation of Airbus=== | |||
| ], the first aircraft model launched by Airbus.]] | |||
| Airbus Industrie was formally set up in 1970 following an agreement between ] (]) and Deutsche Airbus—itself a ] aerospace consortium consisting of ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="flugrevue_airbus_story">"." Burgner, N. '']''. ], ].</ref> The grouping was joined by ] of ] in 1971. Each company would deliver its sections as fully equipped, ready to fly items. The name "Airbus" was taken from a non-proprietary term used by the airline industry in the 1960s to refer to a commercial aircraft of a certain size and range, for this term was acceptable to the French linguistically. | |||
| In 1972 the A300 made its maiden flight and the first production model, the A300B2 entered service in 1974. Initially the success of the consortium was poor but by 1979 there were 81 aircraft in service. It was the launch of the ] in 1981 that guaranteed the status of Airbus as a major player in the aircraft market - the aircraft had over 400 orders before it first flew, compared to 15 for the A300 in 1972. | |||
| It was a fairly loose alliance but that changed shortly after major defence mergers in 2000. ] (successor to Deutsche Airbus), ] (successor to Sud-Aviation) and CASA merged to form ]. In 2001 BAE Systems (formerly British Aerospace) and EADS formed the '''Airbus Integrated Company''' to coincide with the development of the new ] which will seat 845 passengers and be the world's largest commercial passenger jet when it enters service in late 2007 according to the revised schedule announced in October of 2006<ref> - airbus press release</ref>. | |||
| ===BAE sale and A380 controversy=== | |||
| ], the largest passenger jet in the world, is set to enter commercial service in 2007.]] | |||
| On ] ] BBC News reported that BAE Systems was selling again its share, then "conservatively valued" at ]3.5 billion (]$4.17 bn). <ref name="bbc_bae_20060406">"." ]. ] ].</ref> The move was seen by many analysts as a move to make partnerships with U.S. firms more feasible, in both financial and political terms.<ref name="wsj_bae_20060407">"" Michaels, D. '']''. ] ].</ref> BAE originally sought to agree a price with EADS through an informal process. However due to the slow pace of negotiations and disagreements over price, BAE exercised its ] which saw investment bank ] appointed to give an independent valuation. | |||
| In June 2006, Airbus became embroiled in a significant international controversy over its announcement of a further delay in the delivery of its A380. In the wake of the announcement, the value of associated stock plunged by up to a quarter in a matter of days, although it soon recovered somewhat. Allegations of insider trading on the part of ], CEO of EADS, its majority corporate parent, promptly followed. The loss of associated value caused great concern on the part of BAE, '']'' describing a "furious row" between BAE and EADS, with BAE believing the announcement was designed to depress the value of its share. <ref name="row"> ''The Independent''. Retrieved ] ] </ref> A French shareholder group filed a class action lawsuit against EADS in a Dutch court for failing to inform investors of the financial implications of the A380 delays while airlines to which deliveries were promised are expected to demand compensation.<ref name="FT 20060711 frontpage"> {{cite news | last=Hollinger | first=Peggy | coauthors=Done, Kevin | title=Sharp drop in orders at Airbus | pages=1,14 | publisher=Financial Times Daily | language=English | date=] ] }}</ref> As a result, EADS chief ] and Airbus ] ] announced their resignations on ] ].<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/03/business/worldbusiness/03airbus.html</ref> Forgeard's severance package is expected to include three years of salary plus the 2005 bonus; a total of at least €6 million, possibly topping €7 million.<ref name="FT 20060711 frontpage"/> | |||
| On ] ] Rothschild valued BAE's stake at £1.9 billion (€2.75 billion); well below the expectation of BAE, analysts and even EADS. <ref>"" ''The Guardian'' Retrieved 3 July 2006</ref> On 5 July 2006 BAE appointed independent auditors to study why the value of its share of Airbus had fallen from the original estimates to the Rothschild valuation. They pushed back any potential sale until September at the earliest. <ref> ''""'' CNN.com ] ] </ref> On 6 September 2006 BAE agreed to sell its stake in Airbus to EADS for £1.87 billion (€2.75 billion, $3.53 billion), pending BAE shareholder approval. <ref>{{cite news | title = BAE agrees to £1.87bn Airbus sale | publisher = BBC News | date = 2006-09-06 | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5321626.stm | accessdate =2006-09-06}}</ref> On 4 October shareholders voted in favour of the sale. <ref>{{cite news | last = Hotten | first = Russell | title = BAE vote clears sale of Airbus stake | publisher = Daily Telegraph | date = 2006-10-04 | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/10/04/bcnbae04.xml | accessdate =2006-10-05}}</ref> | |||
| On ] ] ], Humbert's successor, resigned due to differences with parent company EADS over the amount of independence he would be granted in implementing his reorganization plan for Airbus. He will be succeeded by EADS co-CEO ]. This brings Airbus under more direct control of its parent company. | |||
| ===2007 restructuring=== | |||
| On 28 February 2007 CEO Louis Gallois announced the company's restructuring plans. Entitled Power<sup>8</sup>, the plan would see 10,000 jobs cut over four years; 4,300 in France, 3,700 in Germany, 1,600 in the UK and 400 in Spain. 5,000 of the 10,000 would be at sub contractors. Plants at ], ] and ] face sell off or closure, while ], ] and ] are "open to investors".<ref>{{cite news |title= Airbus confirms 10,000 job cuts|url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6402859.stm|publisher= BBC|date= 2007-02-28|accessdate= 2007-02-28}}</ref> The announcements have resulted in Airbus unions in France to strike, with German Airbus workers possibly following . | |||
| ==Civilian products== | |||
| The airbus product line started with the ], the world's first twin-aisle, twin-engined aircraft. A shorter, re-winged, re-engined variant of the ] is known as the ]. Building on its success, Airbus launched the ] with its innovative ] control system. The A320 has been, and continues to be, a great commercial success. The A318 and A319 are shorter derivatives with some of the latter under construction for the corporate ''biz-jet'' market (]). A stretched version is known as the A321 and is proving competitive with later models of the Boeing 737. | |||
| The longer range products, the twin-jet ] and the four-engine ], have efficient wings, enhanced by ]. The Airbus has an operating range of 16 700 kilometres (9000 nautical miles), the second longest range of any commercial jet after the Boeing 777-200LR (range of 17 446 km or 9420 nautical miles). The company is particularly proud of its use of ] technologies and the common cockpit and systems in use throughout the aircraft family, which make it much easier to train crew. | |||
| Airbus is studying a replacement for the A320 series, tentatively dubbed ], for "New Short-Range aircraft."<ref name="fi_737rs_nsr">"." '']''. ], ].</ref> | |||
| In March 2006 Airbus announced the closing of the A300/A310 production line, ending over 30 years of production. The last delivery will take place in 2nd quarter 2007. Airbus intends to relocate Toulouse A320 final assembly activity to Hamburg, and A350/A380 production in the opposite direction as part of its ] organization plan begun under ex-CEO ].<ref name="forbes_20070115">"." '']''. ], ].</ref> | |||
| Until its retirement in 2003, Airbus supplied replacement parts and service for the ]. | |||
| {| class="toccolours" align="center" border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2" style="border-collapse: collapse;" | |||
| |+'''Product list and details (date information from Airbus)''' | |||
| |----- bgcolor=#006699 | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Aircraft ''' | |||
| |align=center|'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Description ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Seats ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Max ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Launch date ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> 1st flight ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> 1st delivery ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Production to cease ''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, twin aisle | |||
| |align=center |228-254 | |||
| |align=center |361 | |||
| |May 1969 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |May 1974 | |||
| |July 2007 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, twin aisle, modified A300 | |||
| |align=center |187 | |||
| |align=center |279 | |||
| |July 1978 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Dec 1985 | |||
| |July 2007 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, single aisle, shortened 6.17 m from A320 | |||
| |align=center |107 | |||
| |align=center |117 | |||
| |Apr 1999 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Oct 2003 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, single aisle, shortened 3.77 m from A320 | |||
| |align=center |124 | |||
| |align=center |156 | |||
| |June 1993 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Apr 1996 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, single aisle | |||
| |align=center |150 | |||
| |align=center |180 | |||
| |Mar 1984 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Mar 1988 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, single aisle, lengthened 6.94 m from A320 | |||
| |align=center |185 | |||
| |align=center |220 | |||
| |Nov 1989 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Jan 1994 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, twin aisle. | |||
| |align=center |253-295 | |||
| |align=center |406-440 | |||
| |June 1987 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Dec 1993 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |4 engine, twin aisle | |||
| |align=center |239-380 | |||
| |align=center |420-440 | |||
| |June 1987 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Jan 1993 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |2 engine, twin aisle | |||
| |align=center |270-350 | |||
| |align=center | | |||
| |Dec 2006 | |||
| |2011 | |||
| |mid 2013 | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |4 engine, double deck, quad aisle | |||
| |align=center |555 | |||
| |align=center |853 | |||
| |2002 | |||
| |] ] | |||
| |Oct 2007 | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Military products== | |||
| In January 1999 Airbus established a separate company, ], to undertake development and production of a turboprop powered ] aircraft (the ].) The A400M is being developed by several ] members, ], ], ], ], ], ], and the ], as an alternative to the ]. Expansion in the military aircraft market will reduce, but not negate, Airbus' exposure to the effects of cyclical downturns in civil aviation. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] ''(Multi Role ] Transport)'' | |||
| *] | |||
| ==Airliner deliveries== | |||
| {{main|List of Airbus orders and deliveries}} | |||
| ==Competition with Boeing== | |||
| Airbus is in tight competition with Boeing every year for aircraft orders. Though both manufacturers have a broad product range in various segments from single-aisle to wide-body, both manufacturers' offerings do not always compete head-to-head. Instead they respond with models a bit smaller or a bit bigger than the other in order to plug any holes in demand and achieve a better edge. The A380, for example, is designed to be a bit bigger than the 747. The A350XWB competes with the high end of the 787 and the low end of the 777. The A320 is bigger than the 737-700 but smaller than the 737-800. The A321 is bigger than the 737-900 but smaller than the previous 757-200. Airlines see this as a benefit since they get a more complete product range from 100 seats to 500 seats than if both companies offered identical aircraft. | |||
| In recent years the ] has outsold its Airbus counterparts, which include the A340 family as well as the A330-300. The smaller A330-200 competes with the ], outselling its Boeing counterpart in recent years. The A380 is anticipated to further reduce sales of the Boeing 747, gaining Airbus a share of the market in very large aircraft, though frequent delays in in the A380 program have caused several customers to consider the refreshed ].<ref name="times_delays_20061004">{{cite news|url=http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9077-2387999,00.html|title=Airbus will lose €4.8bn because of A380 delays|first=David|last=Robertson|publisher=The Times Business News|date=], ]}}</ref> Airbus has also proposed the ] to compete with the fast-selling ], after being under great pressure from airlines to produce a competing model. | |||
| There are around 4,463 Airbus ] in service, with Airbus managing to win over 50 per cent of aircraft orders in recent years. Airbus products are still outnumbered 6 to 1 by in-service Boeings (there are over 5,000 Boeing 737s alone in service). This however is indicative of historical success - Airbus made a late entry into the modern jet airliner market (1972 vs. 1958 for Boeing). | |||
| Airbus won a greater share of orders in 2003, 2004. It also delivered more aircraft in 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006. | |||
| In 2005, Airbus made a claim to victory again with 1111 (1055 net)<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://www.airbus.com/en/corporate/orders_and_deliveries/|title=Airbus Orders and Deliveries}}</ref>, compared to 1029 (net of 1002) for Boeing<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://active.boeing.com/commercial/orders/index.cfm?content=displaystandardreport.cfm&optReportType=AnnOrd&pageid=m15521|accessdate=Insert accessdate here|title=Insert title here}}</ref> However, Boeing won 55% of 2005 orders by value, due to that firm winning several important widebody sales at the expense of Airbus. | |||
| In 2006 Boeing won more orders by both measures. | |||
| ===Orders=== | |||
| {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: right; font-size: 95%;" | |||
| |- style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background-color:#007000;" | |||
| | | |||
| | 2006 | |||
| | 2005 | |||
| | 2004 | |||
| | 2003 | |||
| | 2002 | |||
| | 2001 | |||
| | 2000 | |||
| | 1999 | |||
| | 1998 | |||
| | 1997 | |||
| | 1996 | |||
| | 1995 | |||
| | 1994 | |||
| | 1993 | |||
| | 1992 | |||
| | 1991 | |||
| | 1990 | |||
| | 1989 | |||
| |- | |||
| |Airbus | |||
| |791 | |||
| |1055 | |||
| |366 | |||
| |284 | |||
| |300 | |||
| |375 | |||
| |520 | |||
| |476 | |||
| |556 | |||
| |460 | |||
| |326 | |||
| |106 | |||
| |125 | |||
| |38 | |||
| |136 | |||
| |101 | |||
| |404 | |||
| |421 | |||
| |- | |||
| |Boeing | |||
| |1044 | |||
| |1002 | |||
| |272 | |||
| |239 | |||
| |251 | |||
| |314 | |||
| |588 | |||
| |355 | |||
| |606 | |||
| |543 | |||
| |708 | |||
| |441 | |||
| |125 | |||
| |236 | |||
| |266 | |||
| |273 | |||
| |533 | |||
| |716 | |||
| |} | |||
| ===Deliveries=== | |||
| {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: right; font-size: 95%;" | |||
| |- style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background-color:#006699;" | |||
| | | |||
| | 2006 | |||
| | 2005 | |||
| | 2004 | |||
| | 2003 | |||
| | 2002 | |||
| | 2001 | |||
| | 2000 | |||
| | 1999 | |||
| | 1998 | |||
| | 1997 | |||
| | 1996 | |||
| | 1995 | |||
| | 1994 | |||
| | 1993 | |||
| | 1992 | |||
| | 1991 | |||
| | 1990 | |||
| | 1989 | |||
| |- | |||
| |Airbus | |||
| |434 | |||
| |378 | |||
| |320 | |||
| |305 | |||
| |303 | |||
| |325 | |||
| |311 | |||
| |294 | |||
| |229 | |||
| |182 | |||
| |126 | |||
| |124 | |||
| |123 | |||
| |138 | |||
| |157 | |||
| |163 | |||
| |95 | |||
| |105 | |||
| |- | |||
| |Boeing | |||
| |398 | |||
| |290 | |||
| |285 | |||
| |281 | |||
| |381 | |||
| |527 | |||
| |491 | |||
| |620 | |||
| |563 | |||
| |375 | |||
| |271 | |||
| |256 | |||
| |312 | |||
| |409 | |||
| |572 | |||
| |606 | |||
| |527 | |||
| |402 | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- please only update if you have a pair of figures covering the same period --> | |||
| ===Subsidies=== | |||
| Boeing has continually protested over "launch aid" and other forms of government aid to Airbus, while Airbus has argued that Boeing receives illegal subsidies through military and research contracts and tax breaks. | |||
| In July 2004 ] (then-Boeing ]) accused Airbus of abusing a 1992 bilateral EU-US agreement providing for disciplines for large civil aircraft support from governments. Airbus is given reimbursable launch investment (RLI, called "launch aid" by the US) from European governments with the money being paid back with interest, plus indefinite royalties, but only if the aircraft is a commercial success<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2095-1631948,00.html|accessdate=Insert accessdate here|title=Insert title here}}</ref>. Airbus contends that this system is fully compliant with the 1992 agreement and ] rules. The agreement allows up to 33 per cent of the programme cost to be met through government loans which are to be fully repaid within 17 years with interest and royalties. These loans are held at a minimum interest rate equal to the cost of government borrowing plus 0.25%, which would be below market rates available to Airbus without government support<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3722888.stm|accessdate=Insert accessdate here|title=Insert title here}}</ref>. Airbus claims that since the signature of the EU-U.S. Agreement in 1992, it has repaid European governments more than U.S.$6.7 billion and that this is 40% more than it has received.<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre/pressreleases/05_30_05_Boeing.html|accessdate=Insert accessdate here|title=Insert title here}}</ref>. | |||
| Airbus argues that the ] military contracts awarded to Boeing (the second largest U.S. defence contractor) are in effect a form of subsidy (see the Boeing ] military contracting controversy). The significant U.S. government support of technology development via ] also provides significant support to Boeing, as does the large tax breaks offered to Boeing which some claim are in violation of the 1992 agreement and ] rules. In its recent products such as the ], Boeing has also been offered substantial support from local and state governments<ref>http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3793314</ref>. However it has been argued that in U.S. government support of technology development, anyone can benefit from the results; even Airbus can benefit from them. | |||
| In January 2005 the European Union and United States trade representatives, ] and ] (since replaced by ]) respectively, agreed to talks aimed at resolving the increasing tensions. These talks were not successful with the dispute becoming more acrimonious rather than approaching a settlement. | |||
| ===World Trade Organization litigation=== | |||
| On ] ] the ] filed a case against the ] for providing allegedly illegal subsidies to Airbus. Twenty-four hours later the European Union filed a complaint against the United States protesting support for Boeing.<ref name="">{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4594581.stm|accessdate=2005-05-31|title=Flare-up in EU-US air trade row}}</ref> | |||
| Portman (from the USA) and Mandelson (from the EU) issued a joint statement stating: ''"We remain united in our determination that this dispute shall not affect our cooperation on wider bilateral and multilateral trade issues. We have worked together well so far, and intend to continue to do so."'' | |||
| Tensions increased by the support for the Airbus A380 have erupted into a potential trade war due to the upcoming launch of the Airbus A350. Airbus would ideally like the A350 programme to be launched with the help of state loans covering a third of the development costs although it has stated it will launch without these loans if required. The A350 will compete with Boeing's most successful project in recent years, the 787 Dreamliner. | |||
| EU trade officials are questioning the funding provided by NASA, the Department of Defense (in particular in the form of R&D contracts that benefited Boeing) as well as funding from US states (in particular the State of Washington, the State of Kansas and the State of Illinois) for the launch of Boeing aircraft, in particular the ]. | |||
| ==International manufacturing presence== | |||
| ]. ({{coor dms|43|36|44|N|1|21|47|E}})]] | |||
| The three final assembly lines of Airbus are in ] (France) (two assembly lines) and ] (Germany) (one assembly line). A fourth final assembly line, for the ], is under construction in ] (Spain). It is estimated that this new assembly line will be operational by October 2006. | |||
| Airbus, however, has a number of other plants in different European locations, reflecting its foundation as a consortium. An original solution to the problem of moving aircraft parts between the different factories and the assembly plants is the use of "]" specially enlarged jets, capable of carrying entire sections of fuselage of Airbus aircraft. This solution has also been investigated by Boeing, who retrofitted 3 of their 747 aircraft to transport the components of the 787. An exception to this scheme is the A380, whose fuselage and wings are too large for sections to be carried by the ]. Large A380 parts are brought by ship to ], and then transported to the Toulouse assembly plant by a specially enlarged road. | |||
| North America is an important region to Airbus in terms of both aircraft sales and suppliers. 2,000 of the total of approximately 5,300 Airbus jetliners sold by Airbus around the world, representing every aircraft in its product line from the 107-seat A318 to the 565-passenger A380, are ordered by North American customers. According to Airbus, US contractors supporting an estimated 120,000 jobs earned estimated $5.5 billion (2003) worth of business. For example, one version of the A380 has 51% American content in terms of work share value. <!-- Applies to GP7200 version of the A380 only --> | |||
| EADS Airbus will be opening an assembly plant in ], ] for its A320 series airliners, to be operational in ]. ] and ] will be EADS' local partners for the site, to which subassemblies will be sent from plants around the world.<ref name="eads_20061026_pr">"." EADS Airbus official press release. ], ].</ref> | |||
| ===Workforce by countries=== | |||
| {|border=0 cellspacing=1 cellpadding=2 | |||
| |----- bgcolor=#006699 | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Country ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Airbus direct employees ''' | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|19,358 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|18,423 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|8,688 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|2,726 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|405+ | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|100+ | |||
| |----- | |||
| |'''Total''' | |||
| |align=right|49,700+ | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>''(Data as of ], ])''</small> | |||
| ===Workforce by sites=== | |||
| {|border=0 cellspacing=1 cellpadding=2 | |||
| |----- bgcolor=#006699 | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Airbus site ¹ ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Country ''' | |||
| |'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Workforce ''' | |||
| |----- | |||
| |]<br>(], ], ]) | |||
| |]<br><br> | |||
| |align=right|14,133<br><br> | |||
| |----- | |||
| |]<br>(], ], ]) | |||
| |]<br><br> | |||
| |align=right|11,185<br><br> | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (]), ] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|4,379 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |], ], ] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|4,309 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|3,051 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (], ]) | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|2,243 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|2,227 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|2,106 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|1,869 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|1,172 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (]) | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|1,129 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|1,100 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (]) | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|483 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (], ]) | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|165+ | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|200+ | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|100+ | |||
| |----- | |||
| |]<ref name="eads_20061026_pr" /> | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|TBD | |||
| |----- | |||
| |] (]) | |||
| |] | |||
| |align=right|100 | |||
| |----- | |||
| |'''Total''' | |||
| | | |||
| |align=right|49,700+ | |||
| |} | |||
| <small>''(Data as of ], ])''</small> | |||
| <small>¹ Name of the urban/metropolitan area appears first, then in parenthesis are the exact locations of the plants</small> | |||
| ==Airbus Aircraft Numbering System== | |||
| The Airbus numbering system starts with the main aircraft model number (Ammm) followed by a dash and three digits (-sev) following the pattern Ammm-sev. The model number takes the form of the letter "A" followed by three digits (m), e.g. A320. The series number is a single digit (s). Two more digits after the series number represent the engine (e) and a version number (v). To use an A320-200 with IAE V2500-A1 engines as an example, the code is A320-2ev for the model and series number. Adding the engine manufacturer (for codes, see below), this makes the code now A320-23v. The version is 1, taking the code to A320-231. | |||
| An additional letter is sometimes used. These include, 'C' for a combi version (passenger/freighter), 'F' for a freighter model, 'R' for the long range model, and 'X' for the enhanced model. | |||
| === Engine codes === | |||
| {| border="2" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;" | |||
| |----- bgcolor=#006699 | |||
| !'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Code ''' | |||
| !'''<font color=#FFFFFF> Manufacturing Company ''' | |||
| |---- | |||
| |0 | |||
| |] (GE) | |||
| |---- | |||
| |1 | |||
| |] (GE/SNECMA) | |||
| |---- | |||
| |2 | |||
| |] (P&W) | |||
| |---- | |||
| |3 | |||
| |] (R-R, P&W, Kawasaki, Mitsubishi, and Ishikawajima-Harima) | |||
| |---- | |||
| |4 | |||
| |] (R-R) | |||
| |---- | |||
| |6 | |||
| |] (GE and P&W) | |||
| |} | |||
| == References == | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| {{commonscat|Airbus}} | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| ===Key Airbus documents=== | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| <br> | |||
| {{Airbus aircraft}} | |||
| {{airlistbox}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 02:04, 17 June 2007
FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!FUCK THE A350!!! THE 787 IS A LOT BETTER!!!