Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Seven day roguelike (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:22, 11 July 2007 editMinimaki (talk | contribs)174 edits adjusted my previous edit (editing from cellphone..)← Previous edit Revision as of 08:23, 11 July 2007 edit undoA Man In Black (talk | contribs)38,430 edits []: deleteNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven day roguelike}}</ul></div> <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven day roguelike}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Seven day roguelike}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Seven day roguelike}} - <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Still no verification (] of notability (WP:N]], after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). ] 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC) Still no verification (] of notability (], after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). ] 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The nom is a new user, but the reasoning is correct. Nobody has ever seen fit to comment on this particular subject in reliable sources. About three months ago, I tried on the ] to get some sort of insight on what sources might be used to establish the notability of the subject, but the upshot of the discussion was that no such sources exist. Unfortunately, that means that Misplaced Pages shouldn't be the first publication to comment on the subject. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:23, 11 July 2007

Seven day roguelike

AfDs for this article:
Seven day roguelike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Still no verification (WP:V of notability (WP:N, after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). Minimaki 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. The nom is a new user, but the reasoning is correct. Nobody has ever seen fit to comment on this particular subject in reliable sources. About three months ago, I tried on the talk page to get some sort of insight on what sources might be used to establish the notability of the subject, but the upshot of the discussion was that no such sources exist. Unfortunately, that means that Misplaced Pages shouldn't be the first publication to comment on the subject. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Seven day roguelike (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions Add topic