| Revision as of 09:48, 16 July 2007 editOldwindybear (talk | contribs)5,177 edits explanation for block← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:03, 16 July 2007 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,751 edits +Next edit → | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| ==Block== | ==Block== | ||
| I have blocked you for one week for the comments you made about me on TomStar's nomination talk page. You accused me of nominating him for having nominated me. That was provably false. He did not nominate me, Stillstudying did, and he formatted the nomination. Further, the links you placed showed that I never said, as you claimed, that I nominted him in return for nominating me. I blocked you for 24 hours, and lifted it after teling you I would block you again if you continued false statements. I warned you that continued false statements would result in another blocking, and you made additional false statements last night on the RfA talk page. I have blocked you for one week for making false accusations. I will not lift it. Perhaps someone else will, but I would hope they would make a stand for our policies on false accusations and ] which you have grossly violated. ] 09:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | I have blocked you for one week for the comments you made about me on TomStar's nomination talk page. You accused me of nominating him for having nominated me. That was provably false. He did not nominate me, Stillstudying did, and he formatted the nomination. Further, the links you placed showed that I never said, as you claimed, that I nominted him in return for nominating me. I blocked you for 24 hours, and lifted it after teling you I would block you again if you continued false statements. I warned you that continued false statements would result in another blocking, and you made additional false statements last night on the RfA talk page. I have blocked you for one week for making false accusations. I will not lift it. Perhaps someone else will, but I would hope they would make a stand for our policies on false accusations and ] which you have grossly violated. ] 09:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I will unblock you immediately if you wish me to, New England. It is totally inappropriate for an administrator to block someone they are clearly in a dispute with. ''']''' 10:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:03, 16 July 2007
| This is New England's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, Black Harry, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
By the way, I truly hope that you change your mind and return. Don't let disagreements bring you down, we all have them on Misplaced Pages. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 21:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks in part to your support, I am Misplaced Pages's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC) P.S. I hope you reconsider and come back to the project. If not, good luck in your endeavors.
Welcome back!
Welcome back, BH! I'm glad that you decide to return!! Клоун 14:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm glad too; welcome back! Acalamari 23:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Block
I have blocked you for one week for the comments you made about me on TomStar's nomination talk page. You accused me of nominating him for having nominated me. That was provably false. He did not nominate me, Stillstudying did, and he formatted the nomination. Further, the links you placed showed that I never said, as you claimed, that I nominted him in return for nominating me. I blocked you for 24 hours, and lifted it after teling you I would block you again if you continued false statements. I warned you that continued false statements would result in another blocking, and you made additional false statements last night on the RfA talk page. I have blocked you for one week for making false accusations. I will not lift it. Perhaps someone else will, but I would hope they would make a stand for our policies on false accusations and wikipedia assume good faith which you have grossly violated. old windy bear 09:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- I will unblock you immediately if you wish me to, New England. It is totally inappropriate for an administrator to block someone they are clearly in a dispute with. Daniel 10:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)