Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:00, 3 August 2007 editDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits Template_talk:Party shading#Rfc for republican shading← Previous edit Revision as of 18:53, 3 August 2007 edit undoTHF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,107 edits -3 controversies resolved; + Talk:Sicko_(film)#Continued_WP:LEAD_violationsNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{RFCheader|Politics}} {{RFCheader|Politics}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*]. ] requires the lead of an article to describe notable controversies. Does the lead of this article "describe" notable controversies? 18:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
*] an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --] 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC) *] an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --] 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
*] -- dispute about whether the use of ] is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. ], specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) *] -- dispute about whether the use of ] is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. ], specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
*] and ] dispute over capitalization of the word ''realm'' in ''Commonwealth R/realm''. Needs input from people with knowledge of Misplaced Pages style and insight into the nature of the term ''Commonwealth R/realm''. 00:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC) *] and ] dispute over capitalization of the word ''realm'' in ''Commonwealth R/realm''. Needs input from people with knowledge of Misplaced Pages style and insight into the nature of the term ''Commonwealth R/realm''. 00:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
*] -- NPOV check. Does ] require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC) *] -- NPOV check. Does ] require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
*] - dispute over inclusion in ] of fact that Moore was on CNN for 3 hours and 10 minutes in response to Moore's claim that CNN was biased against him. 23:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
*] - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --] 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC) *] - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --] 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
*] - Requesting a review of the biography of Eliot Spitzer. The ongoing controversy has been tagged with NPOV. I've tried to edit it as neutrally as possible. There is no explination for why it was tagged, and I am hoping for some input as to how I could make it more neutral. Thank you. 23:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC) *] - Requesting a review of the biography of Eliot Spitzer. The ongoing controversy has been tagged with NPOV. I've tried to edit it as neutrally as possible. There is no explination for why it was tagged, and I am hoping for some input as to how I could make it more neutral. Thank you. 23:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Line 16: Line 16:
*] Editors disagree strongly on whether waterboarding is torture, and what constitutes a source in this case, we would greatly welcome outside views, and of course contributors. 23:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC) *] Editors disagree strongly on whether waterboarding is torture, and what constitutes a source in this case, we would greatly welcome outside views, and of course contributors. 23:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
*] Is it a problem under ] and ] that the majority of the article consists of Michale Moore's attack on Gupta with no recounting of Gupta's self-defense? Is it appropriate for an anonymous editor to remove the NPOV tag because he disagrees with the multiple editors who find a NPOV violation? 13:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC) *] Is it a problem under ] and ] that the majority of the article consists of Michale Moore's attack on Gupta with no recounting of Gupta's self-defense? Is it appropriate for an anonymous editor to remove the NPOV tag because he disagrees with the multiple editors who find a NPOV violation? 13:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
*] - Does ] apply to non-fiction films? Is a 15K recounting of the plot, including extensive quotes from dialogue and the closing credits, appropriate for Misplaced Pages? 11:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*] Title change to a neutral title which will drastically reduce edit warring. When the ] page when the name was changed to ] the edit warring was reduced dramatically. 11:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC) *] Title change to a neutral title which will drastically reduce edit warring. When the ] page when the name was changed to ] the edit warring was reduced dramatically. 11:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*] There is a dispute about whether to include examples of use of flying checkpoints by Israel, the U.S., and Lebanese militias or to rely only on a general overview of checkpoints.03:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC) *] There is a dispute about whether to include examples of use of flying checkpoints by Israel, the U.S., and Lebanese militias or to rely only on a general overview of checkpoints.03:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*] ] requires mention of significant controversies in the lead paragraphs; ] requires fair presentation of significant points of view. Does it violate ] when there is no mention of right-wing criticism of the movie in the article at all? Should the NPOV tag be removed when there is a significant debate about the neutrality and factual accuracy of the article on the talk page? 19:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


*] Does the lead of this article sattisfy ]? 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC) *] Does the lead of this article sattisfy ]? 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:53, 3 August 2007

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Ethnic minorities in Iran Dispute about use of quotes - whether too extensive or not, whether we should weed out "American sponsored" quotes and sources or not etc and what exactly constities NPOV 00:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law: Difference between revisions Add topic