Misplaced Pages

User talk:RichardWeiss/Archivehistory: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:RichardWeiss Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:42, 31 August 2007 editRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 edits Quick comment: r← Previous edit Revision as of 17:44, 31 August 2007 edit undoBravedog (talk | contribs)247 edits How?Next edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


:We cant be wasting our time with silly nominations of articles that clearly wont be deleted. Please dont waste other editors' time. Thanks, ] 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC) :We cant be wasting our time with silly nominations of articles that clearly wont be deleted. Please dont waste other editors' time. Thanks, ] 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
::How do you know it won't be deleted? PRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRICCCCCCCCCCCK! ] 17:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:44, 31 August 2007

If you want to find some historical talk please go here and use Ctrl F but be warned its a huge archive page and may mess with your web browser.

This user is not an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)





Quick comment

Hey SB. No no no, I'm not here to complain about your edits. Well maybe a little bit, but that's not my main point. I'm just here to ask you to keep cool when arguing against MoritzB: he has been involved in a number of edit wars and I don't think raising the tone will do much good. He's already recruiting ammunition for these disputes and you can do more interesting things than falling into that trap. Best, Pascal.Tesson 03:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, SqueakBox 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Review

Well I was reading the[REDACTED] review topic and I waltzed on up to a person who can communicate for me. I can't register an account because I don't have the time or money to go and get a paid e-mail account. If I e-mailed a response to all readers could you post it for me? It is completely understandable if you couldn't, but I would really appreciate it. Not being able to tell your side of the story is incredibly frustrating. If you agree to, please send an e-mail response. Yours, Saturday 07:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles opened

Hello. The above named arbitration case, in which you were named as a party, has opened. Please submit your evidence directly on the case page, or, if needed, submit it via email to an arbitrator or an arbitration clerk.

For the Arbitration clerk committee,
- Penwhale | 11:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

How?

How is nomming an article for deletion trolling? Bravedog 17:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

We cant be wasting our time with silly nominations of articles that clearly wont be deleted. Please dont waste other editors' time. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
How do you know it won't be deleted? PRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRICCCCCCCCCCCK! Bravedog 17:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
User talk:RichardWeiss/Archivehistory: Difference between revisions Add topic