User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:00, 31 August 2007 editQuackGuru (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:32, 1 September 2007 edit undoRisker (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators28,363 editsm Essjay controversy edit warring againNext edit →
Line 66:		Line 66:
	\|}		\|}
	\|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->		\|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->

			== ] edit warring again ==

			Quack, the recommendation to remove the quotes came from a featured article review, and was not done unilaterally. So what if they are verifiable? They add nothing to the article, and in fact detract from it. Your POV warring is not doing your reputation any good. Please stop. ] 19:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:32, 1 September 2007

Welcome!

Hello QuackGuru! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cool Cosmos 20:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Getting started
Misplaced Pages tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Essjay controversy edit warring again

Quack, the recommendation to remove the quotes came from a featured article review, and was not done unilaterally. So what if they are verifiable? They add nothing to the article, and in fact detract from it. Your POV warring is not doing your reputation any good. Please stop. Risker 19:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)