| Revision as of 18:51, 3 September 2007 editAtabəy (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers7,348 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:31, 3 September 2007 edit undoVartanM (talk | contribs)6,453 edits →Mat HilakariNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| :Speedied again. Did you read any of what I put on your talk page? The article still fails ], miserably.--] - ] 07:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | :Speedied again. Did you read any of what I put on your talk page? The article still fails ], miserably.--] - ] 07:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Atabek== | |||
| I can understand the reasons for your warning, however, if I may ask, why was the image removed from the page ]? ] 18:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | I can understand the reasons for your warning, however, if I may ask, why was the image removed from the page ]? ] 18:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
| No warning has been placed on my page prior to ban, while the warning was placed for similar violation on ] talk page. Can you explain the reasons for such dual treatment? ] 18:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | No warning has been placed on my page prior to ban, while the warning was placed for similar violation on ] talk page. Can you explain the reasons for such dual treatment? ] 18:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Hello Chaser, please note that Atabek violated your ban by revering then self reverting on two Iran-Azerbaijan related articles. Please also note that the user created "Controversies and Consistencies" on his userpage to incite other users and is clearly making this an ethnic/national issue comparing another event to something completely unrelated (Armenian Genocide). | |||
| :Also the link I removed was authored by and I quote "Created by Adil Baguirov and the team" I don't know if Atabek considers himself part of that "team" but both of them shared similar views when both were active. If indeed Atabek considers himself part of Adil Baguirov's team its just another reason to remove it. ] 20:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:31, 3 September 2007
- Keeping dialog readable: If you post here, I'll reply here. If I posted somewhere else, please reply there instead of on my talk page. Thank you.
 Archives |
|---|
| 2006: Mar—Jun 19 | Jun 20—Jul | Aug—Sep | Oct—Dec 17 | Dec 17—31 2007:
Jan | Feb—May |
Jun | Jul |
Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
Attempt at AfD participation
Dear Chaser, I have attempted to discuss the following AfD: Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Dawn_of_the_Dead_in_popular_culture. Please let me know if this is better or if you have additional advice and tips. Thanks again for all of your help! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 00:25, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Roi, I'm a bit disappointed. As someone who's been blocked for sockpuppetry, you should know how serious such a charge is. Collusion is a very different thing. If you're going to accuse someone of something, at the very least don't insinuate that the accusation is about something far worse.--Chaser - T 05:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hello! I stated in big letters that I did not suspect sockpuppetry on any of their accounts. Rob's ANI thread on me that followed Eyrian's AN thread I suppose just had me at my wits end with people levelling inaccurate and hostile allegations at me that it seem appropriate to finally get out my own suspicions and to do so without actually bringing anyone to AN, ANI, check user, RfA, or elsewhere, i.e. to NOT put them in any kind of serious "danger." I saw double-standards in some of the criticisms levelled at me as numerous editors posted "per X" messages without being taken to task or that outright copied and pasted arguments from one AfD to the next without criticism. I understand that I had been blocked previously, but still. And after seeing Otto's hostile reply to DGG, I felt rather enraged. Anyway, maybe we should focus my efforts elsewhere? I've done a lot of welcoming and general article improvement and tried a small amount of "vandal fighting" as well. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 05:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- "I strongly believe that we should not jump to the sockpuppetry conclusion, but..." It doesn't matter what comes after "but", because at that point people are already on edge.--Chaser - T 05:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I see your point. How do you recommend I deal with stuff like what Eyrian did or Rob? I believe I can offer a lot to this site and spent a good deal of time welcoming new users and going through the grammar in articles today. I am working on a dissertation and so my volunteer time on something that I have found useful and I know my students use is time that I would like to spend without people who just disagree with me out of principal looking for ways to attack me and report erroneously on my edits. I want to help improve an online encyclopedia, not contend with random people harassing or stalking me or not assuming good faith for me. Also, I apologize for taking up so much of your time with this stuff tonight. I read that you're working on a law degree and so probably have limited time to spare as well for a volunteer project. I really do appreciate your help and I hope that you have an enjoyable labor day weekend. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 05:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- "I strongly believe that we should not jump to the sockpuppetry conclusion, but..." It doesn't matter what comes after "but", because at that point people are already on edge.--Chaser - T 05:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hello! I stated in big letters that I did not suspect sockpuppetry on any of their accounts. Rob's ANI thread on me that followed Eyrian's AN thread I suppose just had me at my wits end with people levelling inaccurate and hostile allegations at me that it seem appropriate to finally get out my own suspicions and to do so without actually bringing anyone to AN, ANI, check user, RfA, or elsewhere, i.e. to NOT put them in any kind of serious "danger." I saw double-standards in some of the criticisms levelled at me as numerous editors posted "per X" messages without being taken to task or that outright copied and pasted arguments from one AfD to the next without criticism. I understand that I had been blocked previously, but still. And after seeing Otto's hostile reply to DGG, I felt rather enraged. Anyway, maybe we should focus my efforts elsewhere? I've done a lot of welcoming and general article improvement and tried a small amount of "vandal fighting" as well. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 05:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Chaser, I am sending you an email in a moment. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 06:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
PbNation
i just made my first[REDACTED] page entitled "PbNation" and much to my surprise you deleted it. i was wondering what i did wrong, and if you could possibly help me do a new one, or possibly fix the one you just deleted. it's one of the largest forum sites on the web, i'm sorry but i fail to see how it is not "noteable" —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatsWhatSheSaid12 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- There's a message about this on your user talk page linking to Misplaced Pages:Notability (web), the relevant guideline.--Chaser - T 21:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Resp
Thanks for telling me, sorry for the slow response and fix, my internet has been giving me hell all morning. Cheers! Dfrg.msc 03:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Supreme Court case lists
Hey, thanks for the explanation, Chaser...I've been on Misplaced Pages for more than a year and the syntax tags still confuse me a bit. Kind of makes me happy I went to law school instead of becoming a programmer. :-) --Eastlaw 07:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
List of notable United States Supreme Court cases
I've updated the code used on List of notable United States Supreme Court cases to no longer require redirects from the Template namespace, and then I subsequently deleted the unused template redirects. Great work on the SCOTUS up-keep. The lists look very professional and well done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 21:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks and thanks. You do great work, MZM.--Chaser - T 21:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Mat Hilakari
You will find he is very notable student politician in Australia. Please leave the article alone. Monashblues 04:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I have reinstated the article, it is not complete. Don't you dare speedy delete it again. Thanks. Monashblues 04:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedied again. Did you read any of what I put on your talk page? The article still fails WP:BIO, miserably.--Chaser - T 07:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Atabek
I can understand the reasons for your warning, however, if I may ask, why was the image removed from the page Khojaly Massacre? Atabek 18:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
And this as well: , how do you find a comment "Adil Baguirov and the team..." to be an assumption of good faith? Atabek 18:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
No warning has been placed on my page prior to ban, while the warning was placed for similar violation on User:VartanM talk page. Can you explain the reasons for such dual treatment? Atabek 18:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Chaser, please note that Atabek violated your ban by revering then self reverting on two Iran-Azerbaijan related articles. Please also note that the user created "Controversies and Consistencies" on his userpage to incite other users and is clearly making this an ethnic/national issue comparing another event to something completely unrelated (Armenian Genocide).
- Also the link I removed was authored by and I quote "Created by Adil Baguirov and the team" I don't know if Atabek considers himself part of that "team" but both of them shared similar views when both were active. If indeed Atabek considers himself part of Adil Baguirov's team its just another reason to remove it. VartanM 20:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)