Revision as of 23:40, 18 September 2007 editILike2BeAnonymous (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,861 edits →nickname← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:42, 18 September 2007 edit undoILike2BeAnonymous (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,861 edits →Rift: replyNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Rift== | ==Rift== | ||
Please stop replacing San Andreas Rift with San Andreas Fault. Your arguement that rift is a redlink is illogical, X creek could be a redlink that doesnt mean it should be changed to X gorge because that related feature indeed has an article. IL2BA statement's declaring that the USGS maps do not say rift are misinformed or an outright lie, they do, I insist you take a look again. Remove it and i will replace it, accuse me of 3RR violation i will report you for vandalism. Please do not disreagrd the facts. You recently stated I had an obsession with feces, I personally would rather have an obsession with feces than with "shit" since you seem to use that term and its derivatives very often when speaking of me. Please let's keep this about the article and not be ad hominem as you like to link to. Also I reinserted without the redlink, not that theres anything wrong with them, but i feel this may help to diffuse the situation for the time being.'''Cholga'''<sup>'']''</sup> 23:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | Please stop replacing San Andreas Rift with San Andreas Fault. Your arguement that rift is a redlink is illogical, X creek could be a redlink that doesnt mean it should be changed to X gorge because that related feature indeed has an article. IL2BA statement's declaring that the USGS maps do not say rift are misinformed or an outright lie, they do, I insist you take a look again. Remove it and i will replace it, accuse me of 3RR violation i will report you for vandalism. Please do not disreagrd the facts. You recently stated I had an obsession with feces, I personally would rather have an obsession with feces than with "shit" since you seem to use that term and its derivatives very often when speaking of me. Please let's keep this about the article and not be ad hominem as you like to link to. Also I reinserted without the redlink, not that theres anything wrong with them, but i feel this may help to diffuse the situation for the time being.'''Cholga'''<sup>'']''</sup> 23:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:You show your ignorance once again. A "rift zone" is a place, such as a valley, that an '''earthquake fault''' runs throught. The fault is still called just that: a '''fault''' (e.g., the San Andreas fault). Not rift. That's just incorrect. +] 23:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:42, 18 September 2007
California Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
nickname
there's no reason to disinclude the nickname "The Dogtown" from the nickname parameter from the infobox. I think this is just vindictiveness by IL2BA regarding the debate on the Oakland, California article.Cholga 23:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, it's this conclusion any reasonable person would come to, that a so-called nickname, "The Dogtown", for a place whose name is "Dogtown", isn't worth wasting even one byte over. Besides, it's historical and no longer in use. +ILike2BeAnonymous 23:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, there is no reason to keep any unused parameters. Chris! my talk 23:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Rift
Please stop replacing San Andreas Rift with San Andreas Fault. Your arguement that rift is a redlink is illogical, X creek could be a redlink that doesnt mean it should be changed to X gorge because that related feature indeed has an article. IL2BA statement's declaring that the USGS maps do not say rift are misinformed or an outright lie, they do, I insist you take a look again. Remove it and i will replace it, accuse me of 3RR violation i will report you for vandalism. Please do not disreagrd the facts. You recently stated I had an obsession with feces, I personally would rather have an obsession with feces than with "shit" since you seem to use that term and its derivatives very often when speaking of me. Please let's keep this about the article and not be ad hominem as you like to link to. Also I reinserted without the redlink, not that theres anything wrong with them, but i feel this may help to diffuse the situation for the time being.Cholga 23:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- You show your ignorance once again. A "rift zone" is a place, such as a valley, that an earthquake fault runs throught. The fault is still called just that: a fault (e.g., the San Andreas fault). Not rift. That's just incorrect. +ILike2BeAnonymous 23:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)