| Revision as of 00:34, 20 September 2007 editBuffs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,547 edits no?← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:40, 20 September 2007 edit undoThreeE (talk | contribs)1,000 edits gig emNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :I'll be back -- don't worry. I do appreciate you taking up the cause though! ] 17:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | :I'll be back -- don't worry. I do appreciate you taking up the cause though! ] 17:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Happy yet? :) I can't believe the conflict of interest on the reference for the FTAB article isn't obvious to even the most die-hard aggie. ] 20:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | ::Happy yet? :) I can't believe the conflict of interest on the reference for the FTAB article isn't obvious to even the most die-hard aggie. ] 20:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Stop...just stop== | |||
| ] <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :BQ, no one else is interested in creating yet another page to repeat your (and mine for that matter) points. The article's talk page is more than enough. Feel free to continue to invite everyone you have ever run across on Misplaced Pages to join the discussion there. ] 00:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I can take that as a no? <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 00:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:40, 20 September 2007
FTAB/Peace
Hi ThreeE. My biggest problem with the Powell reference is that I haven't seen the book and it would take me a few weeks to get it on interlibrary loan, so I am not sure of its exact wording. I'll wait until tomorrow and ask BQ if he would help me write something from that perspective. I'm sorry this got so out of hand; I think we've all done stupid stuff and hope we can put it behind us. Karanacs 01:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the branch! I return the sentiment. Perhaps BQ can answer our question. ThreeE 01:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- (edit conflict x2)AAAAAAAAAAARGH! I've been trying to answer!!! :-)
- I don't believe in karma or smoking. How about a beer :-) ? So, your offer is accepted. We will leave things as-is...for the most part. I think we can both agree to no substantive changes to the article (I think updating references/fixing typos/adding references), and it would be acceptable. Do you concur? — BQZip01 — 01:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Let's leave edits to the article itself to others for now to avoid any misunderstanding. In addition, I will stay off the talk page for a week. I'm agnostic towards karma and anything religious. Smoking is best left to the dead. Beer, however, is a welcome nectar. ThreeE 01:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Dude, don't pull me in and then bail-out! ;-) If you wish to keep to your agreements above and not edit the article, I understand, but please continue in the discussion.Thedukeofno 15:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll be back -- don't worry. I do appreciate you taking up the cause though! ThreeE 17:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Happy yet? :) I can't believe the conflict of interest on the reference for the FTAB article isn't obvious to even the most die-hard aggie. ThreeE 20:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)