| Revision as of 05:17, 24 September 2007 editHal Cross (talk | contribs)1,042 edits Constructive discussion please← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:36, 24 September 2007 edit undoChristopher Mann McKay (talk | contribs)6,690 edits Removed commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| |}</center></center></small> | |}</center></center></small> | ||
| <!-- DO NOT TYPE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS TEXT --> | <!-- DO NOT TYPE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS TEXT --> | ||
| == AFA issues == | |||
| Hello CMMK. Further to my prior message here about AFA issues, politics, and the homosexual agenda: I made a reply to you on the AFA talkpage specifically about your objections towards the sourced AFA issues material , and I made some suggestions. I have more information about pedophilia to add to that information so I would like some feedback on my talkpage discussion before I add it into the article. ] 13:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Email == | |||
| Send me an email - orpheus.wikipedia@gmail.com (that's not obfuscated, by the way). I've got a question for you. ] 12:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Constructive discussion please== | |||
| CMMK, you made these deletions of sourced views again on the AFA article: . They are sourced views which present published research showing the link between pedophilia and homosexuality, and how they relate to the homosexual agenda. You have removed similarly sourced views for the past weeks. | |||
| You have also just removed a large section from the article . That includes the views and explanations for why those particular elements have been boycotted. In doing so, you are suppressing the views of the AFA. | |||
| You also added this rather poorly sourced and unbalanced paragraph to the article . | |||
| I am being inclusive in my edits and comments on the talkpage so that we can make the article more comprehensive in information. You have as yet not presented any WP reasons or policy for removing the stated views of the AFA or AFA members. You have failed to give any satisfactory reasons for repeatedly removing views on homosexual agenda and pedophilia. You offered this rather unhelpful comment on the talkpage . Your reasoning is totally unsatisfactory. If you do not give satisfactory reasoning then the facts will quite legitimately be restored together with the reliable sources that support them. ] 05:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:36, 24 September 2007
|
Christopher Mann McKay's Talk Page http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Christopher_Mann_McKay |
I will respond to your comment on my talk page, unless you request otherwise. |