Misplaced Pages

User talk:DX927: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:27, 9 November 2007 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Re: Thanks (Wrestlecrap): new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:40, 14 November 2007 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Re: Thanks (Wrestlecrap): ReplyNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:


Re : No problem. =) Upon review of the edit history for WrestleCrap‎, I decided to set the page-protection for that article to be the same as RD Reynolds. That should help a little, though it appears the vandals are now using sleeper accounts. -- ] 00:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Re : No problem. =) Upon review of the edit history for WrestleCrap‎, I decided to set the page-protection for that article to be the same as RD Reynolds. That should help a little, though it appears the vandals are now using sleeper accounts. -- ] 00:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

:Re : I'm not sure I want to know how Fruity Pebbles is related to WrestleCrap. Very strange. So far the vandalism seems fairly light on the article, so it does not require protection at this time. -- ] 21:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:40, 14 November 2007

Welcome!

Hi DX927! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Phgao 22:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Warped Tour 2007:

Your recent edit to Warped Tour 2007 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 18:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:User: Randy Baer

I was only reverting edit by an IP address which I thought to be vandalism. I would never intentionly vandalize someone else's userpage. Sometimes I've made some revertions without looking at them, I just saw an IP editing a userpage and was a tad bit hasty. I have reverted it back now and deleted the clearly wrong warning I gave to the IP. Anyway I'll put the articles on my watchlist and if there's any other way I can help, let me know. AngelOfSadness talk 15:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

AngelOfSadness talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Looks like only admins can edit RD Reynolds. So that article is not a problem considering the vandals will not be able to become admins overnight(thank god). AngelOfSadness talk 16:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
If the guy who has just re-registered is a vandal, you could make a sockpuppet report on him as he created another account to evade the block given to him on his other account. AngelOfSadness talk 20:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you so much, DX927! I guess I was in "robot-mode" for a while, and I'm really sorry. Again, thanks; and I'll be on the lookout. :) *Cremepuff222* 02:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

User:RD Reynolds

Another clone of the Randy Baer/Blade Braxton vandal, by the looks of things. I've even noticed him accusing anonymous users of 'vandalising' pages, when they're only cleaning up his mess (User talk:144.32.130.132#Vandal. I've left a message on his talk page, but you might want to step in, as you've had more experience of dealing with this guy. Elcondor 18:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I've become a bit of a 'Crapper' myself after seeing the wiki.

On another note, the RD Reynolds page has been nominated for AfD again, you may wish to contribute to the discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcondor (talkcontribs) 19:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out, would you know why there isn't a page on Blade Braxton (or Troy Ferguson, as his real name appears on the ECW press site for the new book. ) Elcondor 19:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Now Samueld4bombay is vandalizing the talk page to remove your ban threat. Still, the undo button isn't too hard to hit. Elcondor 19:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

W.Crap

No problems there! I just read some of the above comments, yes sometimes we can get a little hasty, but more often than not, we don't get it wrong. Hope you enjoy wikipedia. Phgao 22:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

That's good to know! You can report them on http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism if they vandalise more than 4 times, and have been warned. Phgao 23:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks (Wrestlecrap)

Re your message: No problem. =) Upon review of the edit history for WrestleCrap‎, I decided to set the page-protection for that article to be the same as RD Reynolds. That should help a little, though it appears the vandals are now using sleeper accounts. -- Gogo Dodo 00:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: I'm not sure I want to know how Fruity Pebbles is related to WrestleCrap. Very strange. So far the vandalism seems fairly light on the article, so it does not require protection at this time. -- Gogo Dodo 21:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
User talk:DX927: Difference between revisions Add topic